Classic Scenario : Purchase Order failing to get created

Hi,
We are using SRM 5.0 classic scenario. We are only using SRM for classic scenario only. while trying to create the backend purchase order i get the following error "       Interval of number range object REQREQ does not exist: SC no. PO "
I have defined the number ranges for PO
Define Number Ranges for Shopping Carts and Follow-on Document
EC     3000000000     3009999999     3000000019   internal
Define transaction type : BUS2201 doc type ECPO
Description          Purchase Order
Int. Number Range         EC
Ext. Number Range         02
Status Profile
BTrans.Category      BUS2201
Description          Purchase Order
Partner Determ.Proc.
Text Schema          PO
Event Schema
In R/3
I copied NB transaction type into ECPO
Defined external number ranges
Thanks
Lebo

Hi
As Jagadish said,
1. In SPRO what is the number range you defined for PO in "Define Num range per Backend System for Follow-on doc".
bp - 10000 19999
lp - 20000 29999
for eg bp -is backend purchase order no ranage
         lp - is local purchase order no ranage
2. Then make sure above number range is maintained in "Define Num range per Shopping Cart and Follow-on doc" and it should be Internal num range.
            bacclnt100(backend logical syatem)    bp pr rs
              bp -backend po no range
              pr - purchase requst
              rs -reservation
3. this for r/3 classic po i.e bp
Description Purchase Order
Int. Number Range : BP
Ext. Number Range
Status Profile
BTrans.Category BUS2201
Description Purchase Order
Partner Determ.Proc.
Text Schema PO
Event Schema
4. define number range for local purchase orders
Description Purchase Order
Int. Number Range LP
Ext. Number Range 03
Status Profile
BTrans.Category BUS2201
Description Purchase Order
Partner Determ.Proc.
Text Schema PO
Event Schema
adding to Jagadish
since you are in classic scenario
a) one po number ranage for backend PO
b) another po number ranage for local PO - Why this is required means if it is ordered a direct local PO will be created SRM rather than R/3 system. this PO document type also must be mapped in r/3.
c) backend PO number ranage configuaration you can map in backend as external.
regards
muthu
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Jun 4, 2009 10:33 AM

Similar Messages

Purchase Requisition Is Being Getting Created In APO But not being publishe

On doing, SNP Location Heuristics on one of our item, purchase requisition is being getting created in APO (We are able to see the same in RRP3) but the same is not being getting published in ECC. On doing CCR of the said location - product combination, it is showing Error u201C182u201D. We have checked the following parameters :-
Item is an APO Item i.e. X0.
It is having a proper Purchasing Group.
As This be a purchase item. So, it is having a valid single Purchase Info Record.
Item Has Not Been Blocked At Any Level.
Vendor From Whom This Item is being getting procured is also open (Not Blocked).
Please suggest what else to be checked and what else can be the reason for non-flowing of purchase requisition from APO to ECC.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Sanjeev Chugh

Hi Sanjeev,
Please check change pointers if any and send them to ECC. Check the order in the planning book whether it has picked the same source for which there is a Purchase info record. If these all are fine then You send them to ECC from the CCR then check the log in ECC through CFG1 tcode.
Regards,
Kishore k Reddy

Purchase order no not getting displayed in FBL3N for doucment type RE

Dear all,
We have done a settings in FBL3N t.code. We have added BSEG-EBELN in the special fields and saved the layout. The purpose is to make the purchase order number to display when we are executing line item display for GR/IR clearing and Cenvat clearing gl account. Purchase order number is correctly getting displayed in Gr/ir clearing account. But in cenvat clearing gl account the transactions that are related to doucment type SA(that is J1IEX transaction), the purchase order number is getting displayed, but in the transactions that are related to document type RE(MIRO transactions), the purcahse order number is not getting displayed.
We have checked the BSEG table for the gl account. The purchase order number is not getting updated for the MIRO transactions in the cenvat clearing gl account.
Please suggest us so that the above issue can be solved.
Thanks & Regards,
Anand

Hi,
Could you please add field BSEG-EBELN as a special field in FBL3N (from menu path Settings -> Special fields). Then, select the Purchase order field again from "Change Layout" (Ctrl+F8). Now this field is available for display variants, it has the technical name 1-U_EBELN and the description 'Purchase Document'. The other field has the same description but as technical name
'1-EBELN'. When you create a display variant be aware that you select 1-U_EBELN and not 1-EBELN.
Please also refer to note 215798.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

Import Purchase orders failing with numeric/value error issue

Import Purchase orders failing with numeric/value error issue

Hi All,
Import Purchase Orders program is failing with PL/SQL Numeric or Value Error.
DECLARE
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error
ORA-06512: at line 55
Kindly help me to get the issue fixed

REP-52284: Failed to get create resource URL from OiD.

Any one using SSO and Reports ever get this error message? I cannot find any relavant information on this error in the documentation ...
Any assistance appreciated

I'm getting the same error:
REP-52284: Failed to get create resource URL from OiD.
running the URL:
http://host:7778/reports/rwservlet?server=rep_new&report=test.rdf&destype=cache&desformat=html&ssoconn=rep
using several different oracle accounts. It seems like it just started happening. Like you, I haven't found any details on OTN or Metalink.
Doug

VMI scenario: purchase order number created by supplier

Hi,
in a VMI scenario is there a way to let the supplier create the purchase order number which is then sent in the ORDRSP IDoc to the customer? And in the customer system the purchase order number from the ORDRSP is used when the purchase order is created from the ORDRSP IDoc.
Is this possible? What needs to be done for it? Any ideas?
Regards,
Robert

Hi Anand,
I'm sorry but I didn't understand it.
The vendor creates a sales order in his system and sends the order rensponse (IDoc ORDRSP) to the customer system. There a purchase order will be created out of the ORDRSP. That's the standard process. But as far as I know in the purchase order there will be no external purchase order number used from the vendor system but a purchase order number from the customer system instead. This purchase order number from the customer system could be sent to the vendor system in an ORDCHG IDoc if needed. I want to know whether or not it's possible to send an external purchase order number from the vendor system to the customer system and create a purchase order with this external purchase order number.
Regards,
Robert

Price during creating of Draft/Purchase Order fails in SP01 PL04

Hi,
we try to port an add-on of us to B1 2005 SP01 PL04. The Add-On create a Draft/Purchase Order by DI Api. Doing so works fine in 2005A SP00 PL08 and PL11.
Now we try to run it at SP01 and we got wrong prices in the DB.
Here some sample code in C#:
SAPbobsCOM.Documents document;
if(createAsDraftDocument == true)
document = (SAPbobsCOM.Documents)MainClass.Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oDrafts));
else
document = (SAPbobsCOM.Documents)(MainClass.Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oPurchaseOrders));
document.DocObjectCode = SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oPurchaseOrders;
filling the documents head data
// adding a document line
document.Lines.Add();
// filling line
document.Lines.ItemCode = 1;
document.Lines.SupplierCatNum = otherValue;
document.Lines.Quantity = 1;
document.Lines.Price = 1;
// adding the document
if(document.Add() != 0)
throw(new DocumentCreationException(MainClass.Company.GetLastErrorDescription());
// everything OK now
// fetch last docentry as docentry and save as xml
SAPbobsCOM.Documents d = (SAPbobsCOM.Documents)(MainClass.Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oDrafts));
d.GetByKey(Convert.ToInt32(docEntry));
string fn = @"E:\draft.xml";
d.SaveXML(ref fn);
In the XML I found:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
<BOM>
     <BO>
          <AdmInfo>
               <Object>112</Object>
          </AdmInfo>
          <ODRF>
               <row>
                    <DocEntry>6</DocEntry>
                    <DocNum>4</DocNum>
                    <DocType>I</DocType>
                    <CANCELED>N</CANCELED>
                    <Handwrtten>N</Handwrtten>
                    <Printed>N</Printed>
                    <DocStatus>O</DocStatus>
                    <InvntSttus>O</InvntSttus>
                    <Transfered>N</Transfered>
                    <ObjType>22</ObjType>
                    <DocDate>20060615</DocDate>
          <DRF1>
               <row>
                    <DocEntry>6</DocEntry>
                    <LineNum>0</LineNum>
                    <TargetType>-1</TargetType>
                    <TrgetEntry>0</TrgetEntry>
                    <BaseRef/>
          <TaxOnExpFc>0.000000</TaxOnExpFc>
                    <TaxOnExpSc>0.000000</TaxOnExpSc>
                              <DRF1>
               <row>
                    <DocEntry>6</DocEntry>
                    <LineNum>0</LineNum>
                    <TargetType>-1</TargetType>
                    <TrgetEntry>0</TrgetEntry>
                    <BaseRef/>
          <TaxOnExpFc>0.000000</TaxOnExpFc>
                    <TaxOnExpSc>0.000000</TaxOnExpSc>
                    <TaxOnExAp>0.000000</TaxOnExAp>
                    <TaxOnExApF>0.000000</TaxOnExApF>
                    <TaxOnExApS>0.000000</TaxOnExApS>
                    <LastPmnTyp/>
                    <LndCstNum>0</LndCstNum>
                    <UseCorrVat>N</UseCorrVat>
                    <BaseType>-1</BaseType>
                    <BaseEntry>0</BaseEntry>
                    <BaseLine>0</BaseLine>
                    <LineStatus>O</LineStatus>
                    <ItemCode>1</ItemCode>
                    <Dscription>1</Dscription>
                    <Quantity>1.000000</Quantity>
                    <ShipDate>20060615</ShipDate>
                    <OpenQty>1.000000</OpenQty>
                    <Price>5.000000</Price>
                    <TaxOnExAp>0.000000</TaxOnExAp>
                    <TaxOnExApF>0.000000</TaxOnExApF>
                    <TaxOnExApS>0.000000</TaxOnExApS>
                    <LastPmnTyp/>
                    <LndCstNum>0</LndCstNum>
                    <UseCorrVat>N</UseCorrVat>
                    <BaseType>-1</BaseType>
                    <BaseEntry>0</BaseEntry>
                    <BaseLine>0</BaseLine>
                    <LineStatus>O</LineStatus>
                    <ItemCode>1</ItemCode>
                    <Dscription>1</Dscription>
                    <Quantity>1.000000</Quantity>
                    <ShipDate>20060615</ShipDate>
                    <OpenQty>1.000000</OpenQty>
                    <Price>5.000000</Price>
which isn't as we expected and as it worked on PL00.
This is the same the draft-form of the last draft we created shows:
Price is 5 instead of the expected price of 1 we assigned through the DI-Api.
Note: The Article-price in the item master data is set to 5.00.
Is anyone out there who could help us as our add-on didn#t work any more on the new SP.
Thanks
Gerd

Hi all,
we found the problem our self. It seems that the handling of 'Price' and 'UnitPrice' differs a little bit between SP00 and SP01.
Setting the 'UnitPrice' in the document lines instead of of the 'Price' solves the problem.
A little bit ugly that the functionallity changes and there is no documentation found.
Greetings
Gerd

Restrict Product Allocation if Planned order is not getting created

Hello All,
We have a scenario that when ever a Sales Order is getting created, Product allocation assignment will be done automatically and planned orders will be created for that requirement in APO.
There are some cases where in because of wrong Variant Configuration, Planned orders wont be created. Our requirement is to delete the Product Allocation automatically or to stop the product allocation assignment if the planned orders are not created.
Do we have any standard setting for doing so or Kindly suggest me some BADI's which can be used for it.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Srinivas.D

Srinivas,
A rather odd requirement.
Have you tried in SCM APO 'Maintain check instructions' to perform the product check first, then allocation? I would think that if the product check failed, then allocation would not be consulted, and no allocation therefore assigned.
IMG > APO > GATP > General Settings > Maintain check instructions
Best Regards,
DB49

SRM Classic Scenario - What decides if shopping cart creates a PO or PR

Hi,
In the classic implementation of self-service, how is it decided if the document created in ECC (after shopping cart approval) is a Purchase Order or a Purchase Requisition?
Is this through a technical solution ie., the PR or PO decision is based on the call to the BAPI that creates a PR or a PO?
If not then where in config is this aspect decided?

hi
if you have assigned FIXED source of supply - PO will be created
if you dont assign any vendor / prefered vendor - PR will be created ( if no specific sourcing configured)
as masa said you can control the follow on documents in the define backend Objects.....

Extended classic delete purchase order line items

We have a problem with the backend purchase order updating with changes made to the local (SRM) PO. A purchase order was cut with six line items and replicated to R/3 as expected. The line items contained materials. A couple of days later the requestor decided this order was not needed so the buyer went into the local PO and deleted the line items. The local PO looks fine but the backend PO has not been updated. I am recieving an alert message that states the following: "The material 0 does not exist or is not activated. BP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC". We do not have a material 0.
I've done an OSS search and came across note 918450. It mentions some issues with account assignment indexes for the extended classic scenerio. I've implemented the note and ran the program BBP_EXT_PO_ACC_INDEX, however nothing has changed with the backend PO. Also the note doesn't give much information on what should be done once the code changes are made.
Can anyone give me some insight on how I might find out what the problem is?
Best regards,
Shawn O'Connor

Hi Shawn,
We had a similar problem before - we didn't get the alert message though. We implemented note 601073 in R/3 and the R/3 PO is updating fine now.
Regards,
Paula.

Purchase Order Response to being created automatically in SRM

We have a scenario where we trigger,from portal, in R/3 to send Orders02 to XI,XI maps Orders02 to Purchase Order to XML, and sends to a SRM system. We see a Purchase Order being created in SRM system, and ALE AUDIT Idoc is sent to the sender R/3 system sucessfully. Now, when we "confirm" the purchase order in the SRM system, this should automatically trigger a Purchase Order Response from SRM to XI and then from XI to the R/3. This part isn't working for us. Are we missing some configurations the SRM side?
Does anyone know how to fix this problem?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.
Karma

Hello Jay
Are you running Rescheduling job - T code V_V2- to confirm the back ordered items?
Are there any status (incompletion/credit) issues or blocks for these items?

Purchase order history not getting updated for Delivery Costs invoice

Hi
Please let me know the reason why delivery costs invoice entry details are not updated in Purchase order history. As it is observed in another client.
Thanks and advance.
Regards
Mohan

Hi
Following Stpes are executiong...
1. PO
2. MIRO for Custom duties
3. MIGO (PO History getting updated after GR for both delivery costs and GR 101)
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Mohan

Need to change delivery date in purchase order when it is created by ME59

Hi Gurus,
Purchase orders are created using Transaction ME59 where we give the Purchase Requistion. The delivery date in the PO will be same as the delivery date of PR. According to my requirement i need to change the date of PO while the time of its creation. could you please suggest me all the user exits to do this...

Check with badi ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST method PROCESS_HEADER - method SET_DATA

We need to use u0080 sign in purchase order text, but get # instead

When the sign is entered into the text of a purchase order we get the message The input field contains prohibited characters and it replaces it with a #.
Can anyone tell me how to fix this problem?
We are using SAP version 4.6c. I think that this was working before we installed some hotpatches?
Many thanks
Karen

Hello Karen and Carlos,
I have found the note 447596 (Euro sign/Trademark sign: processing) which might be of help for you.
It seems that the problem is that the Euro character is not part of the ISO 8859-1 norm which is used by many operating systems. So the Euro character could not be included into the R/3 system character set 1100 and R/3 cannot recognize it.
The only possibility to use the Euro character in the SAPscript editor is to enter <156> in the old editor or to press 'Insert command' and insert SAP character 156 in the new PC editor (this is described in the note 129581). This is the only possibility to use the Euro character.
I hope this helps,
Esther.

Event when Purchase order or contract is created/changed

Hello all,
I need to update a specific table while a purchase order or a contract is created/updated.
I think that it is possible to do so by an event triggered on object class EINKBELEG.
Do you have any document describing how to develp that step by step.
Thanks for your help,
Bertrand

Hello beber17,
Verify if the enhancement CMOD bellow can help you:
AMPL0001   User subscreen for additional data on AMPL
LMEDR001   Enhancements to print program
LMELA002   Adopt batch no. from shipping notification when po
LMELA010   Inbound shipping notification: Transfer item data
LMEQR001   User exit for source determination
LMEXF001   Conditions in Purchasing Documents Without Invoice
LWSUS001   Customer-Specific Source Determination in Retail
M06B0001   Role determination for purchase requisition releas
M06B0002   Changes to comm. structure for purchase requisitio
M06B0003   Number range and document number
M06B0004   Number range and document number
M06B0005   Changes to comm. structure for overall release of
M06E0004   Changes to communication structure for release pur
M06E0005   Role determination for release of purchasing docum
ME590001   Grouping of requsitions for PO split in ME59
MEETA001   Define schedule line type (backlog, immed. req., p
MEFLD004   Determine earliest delivery date f. check w. GR (o
MELAB001   Gen. forecast delivery schedules: Transfer schedul
MEQUERY1   Enhancement to Document Overview ME21N/ME51N
MEVME001   WE default quantity calc. and over/ underdelivery
MM06E001   User exits for EDI inbound and outbound purchasing
MM06E003   Number range and document number
MM06E004   Control import data screens in purchase order
MM06E005   Customer fields in purchasing document
MM06E007   Change document for requisitions upon conversion i
MM06E008   Monitoring of contr. target value in case of relea
MM06E009   Relevant texts for "Texts exist" indicator
MM06E010   Field selection for vendor address
MMAL0001   ALE source list distribution: Outbound processing
MMAL0002   ALE source list distribution: Inbound processing
MMAL0003   ALE purcasing info record distribution: Outbound p
MMAL0004   ALE purchasing info record distribution: Inbound p
MMDA0001   Default delivery addresses
MMAL0002   ALE source list distribution: Inbound processing
MMAL0003   ALE purcasing info record distribution: Outbound p
MMAL0004   ALE purchasing info record distribution: Inbound p
MMDA0001   Default delivery addresses
MMFAB001   User exit for generation of release order
MRFLB001   Control Items for Contract Release Order
Best Regards.
Welinton Rocha

Classic Scenario : Purchase Order failing to get created

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for