Clear Accounting doc

Dear all,
Document flow:
_Invoice 9800000653 - Completed
            Accounting document 0090000344  - Not cleared
_Intercom. Billing 3800000690 - Completed
            Accounting document 0090000394 - Not cleared
Pls advice me How to clear the inter company billing ?
Thanks & Best regards.
Bishnu
14/05

Dear Ravi,
Thanks your reply. Actually I do not see any document using VFX3.
My request is intercom billing #38-690 can't find out in Company:9000 (FLB1N).
Normally the process is :
1) Billing #98-653 (USD64,173.35) - DR. A/R CR. SALES in 9000 (I can see in "FLB5N")
2) Intercom billing #38-690 -DR. Cost of sales  CR. A/P #3000 in 9000 (Now, I can't find out it "FLB1N")
3) CR. SALES#38-690 DR. A/R # 9000 (It can see in "FLB5N" in 3000)
Needed your kind advice for next process.
Thanks & B.Rgds
Bishnu
14/05

Similar Messages

  • Cancel billing doc with Accounting doc clearing

    Dear gurus ,
    the scenario is that  we have a billing doc with wrong pricing and the relative accounting doc has cleared status,then we use VF11 to cancel the billing doc , the system give the information  "Document #### saved (no automatic clearing)" .Message no VF216 .
    My question is,  based on the new cancellation function module AC_DOCUMENT_REVERSE, as note 1259505 description (The most evident effect of the new cancellation procedure is the automatic clearing of the accounting documents.), is that legal or illegal ,the system cancel the billing doc without checking the status of the related accounting doc ?
    IF that is the standard reaction ,how can I make some change or config to make sure that ,the billing doc with cleared  accounting doc can't not be cancelled without reseting the status of accounting doc to "not cleared"?
    Thanks in advance ,
    Ryan
    Edited by: deyi chen on Jun 8, 2011 5:03 AM

    Hi,
    In my scenario system still cancel the invoice which is cleared but should not any accounting impact of canceled invoice
    Even if you try to release manually by VF02 the massage will appear
    Automatic clearing of billing document 12345
    and canc. doc. 17777 not poss.
    If don't want to allow creation of cancel invoice if origin invoice is cleared then do some enhancement.
    Kapil

  • GR/IR Clearing-Goods Receipt Accounting Doc - No cost center or IO

    Hi All,
    For the GR/IR Clearing Account, users did the Goods Receipt. GR document post to FI and created Accounting Document. When we look at GL line item display of GR/IR clearing account (FBL3N), we cannot see the cost center or internal order on Goods Receipt doucment ( document type WE).
    When we look at Invoice ( document type RE), we can see cost center or internal order on invoice accounting document.
    Anyone know how to capture cost center / internal order from Goods Receipt to FI accounting document during GR time ?
    Thank You
    Alex Lee

    Hi
    Thank your for reply. We don't have invenntory.
    GR:
               Dr. Expense ( cost center )
                      Cr. GR/IR Clearing Account
    IR :
                Dr. GR/IR Clearing Account 
                      Cr. Vendor
    In the FBL3N , GL line itme display for GR/IR Clearing Account, it shows cost center on  invoice document (doc tyep : RE) , but we cannot see cost center on goods receipt document (doc type : WE) .

  • Accounting Doc. not cleared...

    dear all,
    Once invoice has been done and released to accounting, we can see the status of INVOICE as completed in DOC. FLOW. After that iam getting the Accounting doc. as "not cleared" in the document flow. What it is actually referring about....as we have not maintained any Blocks.
    Why this acoounting doc. has not been cleared....help me out. what could be the possibilities.
    Rewarded if helpful
    thnax
    Krishna chaitanya

    Krishna after the FI transaction F-28 payments get cleared from finance department.
    then again go to document flow of invoice and see you will now see that yopur document is showing no error message.
    please check and reward point if the problem got solved.
    Regards,
    sameer.

  • GR/IR clearing account not having cleared document

    Hi Friends,
    In FBL3N, Against GR/IR (160224) clearing account, is it mandatory to have clearing document against each line items.
    MIGO and MIRO done.
    client is asking for some line items it's showing cleared doc, for some line items's it's not updated clearing document.
    Regards,
    suresh

    If an item is "Open", it implies that some attention or some action from business is pending. If you are not clearing any items then how can you analyse the GR/IR account ?
    Over a period of time line items for Gr/IR gets accumulated and business cannot go and review all items which may run into thousands. If you are doing clearing regularly, User can review only open items and take appropriate action.

  • GR/IR clearing Account Issue

    Hi everyone
      I want to clear my GR/IR clearing Account. As a result I have to run F.13, but after that when I am taking report from FBL3N, its showing some Doc. still open. Can you please help me out how I clear my GR/IR clearing account?

    hI,
    Use T code MR11 to settle the GR/IR Balances as a month end or year end process or even to know the GR/IR Balances. From there you can post the differences.You can select the below option.
    Surplus type.
    Delivery Surplus:Indicator used to select purchase orders with a delivered quantity that exceeds the invoiced quantity.
    Invoice surplus:Selection of all purchase orders with an invoiced quantity which is larger than the quantity delivered.
    Clear
    GR/IR Clearing Account Clearing
    Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)
    Clearing of Delivery Cost Accounts
    Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs
    Hope this helps you
    Edited by: Sudhir Tiwari on Jan 19, 2011 8:18 AM

  • GR/IR clearing account not getting cleard

    HI Experts,
    When I am trying to clear the GR/IR clearing account it is giving the message as Difference is too large for clearing.
    Actually here the balance is less 1 Rs. For purpose I have defined the clearing differences upto 10 Rs in Transaction code OBA0.
    Here I have mentioned the tolerance group and the same is assigned in the GR/IR clearing account.
    Secondly I have defined the clearing rules as clearing based on purchsing doc (EBELN) and item (EBELP).
    Even though I am getting the same error as Difference is too large.
    Can any one please guide the right process
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ram

    Hi,
    Tolerance Group is defined at different levels.. 1) For the GL 2) At the employees level.. Therefore, no matter what you maintain at the GL level.. if the tolerance at the Employees level is less than what you have maintained at the GL level.. the Employees level will take precedence. So check the tolerance limit at the Employees level and probably you will get answer for the error.
    Regards,
    SAPFICO

  • Difference in GR/IR freight clearing account

    Hello Experts,
    I am facing a problem, wherein i am doing multiple Goods receipt on a different dates for a scheduling agreement. Freight rate maintained in Scheduling agreement is Rs 2.50 per 1 kg, so when doing goods receipt ie DCGR, freight clearing account ie GR/IR freight account gets posted with different values, for eg 1st DCGR doc gets posted at Rs 2.50 per kg, while sometime other DCGR document gets posted at Rs 0.50 per kg.
    I wanted to know why there is difference in rates in GR/IR freight clearing account in every DCGR document, secondly what freight rate is taken in posting & how its gets updated?
    Pls provide solution ASAP.
    Thanks in Advance

    Dear
    Below links will help you to solve the issue.
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=226575
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/91sapr3acct93-freight-grir-clearing-account-407688
    GR/IR Freight Clearing Account - GR & Invoice Verification
    Regards
    Aamir

  • GR/IR Freight Clearing Account - GR & Invoice Verification

    Dear Gurus,
    I have made a PO for 1200 pcs unit price 69.20$.  (GR based IV).   (Valuation - Moving average price)
    Delivery costs - Freight (FRB1) - 1200$
    I have splitted the PO quantity in to 3 different Inbound deliveries
    Inbound 1 - 400 pcs
    Inbound 2 - 400 pcs
    Inbound 3 - 400 pcs
    I have made the Goods receipt for the 1st Inbound - 400 pcs.
    Goods Receipt 1 - 400 pcs.  The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c credited by 400$
    Invoice Verification1 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice verification is 1000$.
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c debited by 1000$
    Goods Receipt2 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 400$
    Invoice Verification2 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 2000$
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 200$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1800$
    Goods Receipt3 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 200$
    Invoice Verification3 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 1500$
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 133.33$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1366.67$
    I don't understand how the logic works for seggreating the amount to GR/IR freight clearing account and GR/IR account.
    For the first 2 GR and IV I could understand that there is a  balance in the PO condition but for the Invoice verification 3. The value debited to GR/IR freight account is 133.33$. Can anyone help me how the calculation is taking place and how the system has arrived to figure 133.33$ in the Invoice verification for GR/IR freight clearing a/c
    Strangely when I have cancelled the Invoice Verification document 3.
    The value Credited to GR/IR freight clearing account is 333.33$ instead of 133.33$
    Can somebody help me to figure out the calucation for IR after the GR for planned delivery costs.
    If any SAP notes or help files can be provided then it would be really helpful.
    Regards
    Fazal.

    Refer this note 311496 & 460244, 129066
    Symptom
    Delivery costs were planned for a purchase order item.
    A goods-receipt-based invoice verification is set.
    Several goods receipts are posted. For invoice entry, both in conventional invoice verification (transaction MR01/MRHR) and in logistics invoice verification (transaction MR1M/MIRO), the delivery costs for each purchase order item are displayed in total.
      This is the same as when, for example, only one of several GR documents/delivery notes is selected.
    Example of a purchase order history:
    Cat. Doc. no.    Itm    MvT Pstg.dt.            Qty.in BUoM       Value in local curr
    GR   5200002605 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5  PC         50,00 DEM
    GR   5200002606 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5  PC         50,00 DEM
    Sum of goods receipts                      10  PC        100,00 DEM
    DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           3,33 DEM
    DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           5.00 DEM
    DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           3,33 DEM
    DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           5.00 DEM
    Total delivery cost GR                                                 16,66 DEM
    If you only select the first GR document in the selection, you get
    the following default values for the delivery costs:
    Amount    Quantity  BUoM Itm  Decription              Vendor
    6,67         10      PC  10    Freight value        VEND01
    10,00        10      PC  10    Freight/quantity     VEND01
    (and not, as sometimes expected: -  3,33 DEM    5 PC
                                        -  5,00 DEM    5 PC)
    Other terms
    WEBRE, delivery costs, planned delivery costs, goods-receipt-based invoice verification, invoice verification
    Reason and Prerequisites
    A function such as the goods-receipt-based invoice verification is not available for delivery costs.
    Solution
    This is not an error; this is a consulting note.

  • Problem in clearing GR/IR clearing account thru' F.13 (automatic clearing)

    Hello,
    While clearing the GR/IR clearing account thru' F.13 (automatic clearing), the system is not giving any error in the test run.But, at the time of Production run following error is given " Account blocked - no clearing  XXXX (GR/IR clearing a/c) XXXXXX(doc no)...No clearing procedure carried out"
    The doc no which is coming in the error is the MIGO accounting doc no.
    We have defined the automatic clearing rule on Purchasing doc & Item no.
    Both MIGO & MIRO are correctly done
    Kindly help.
    Regards,
    WNR

    Hi,
    You need to define the automatic clearing rule on Purchasing doc & amount combination and try once.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sarma Bhamidipati

  • F.13 Automatic Clearing for cenavt clearing account

    I want to do automatic clearing (f.13) for Cenvat Clearing Account
    I have maintained EBELN as a criteria in OB74 & for Cenvat clearing G.L.Account Sort key as 14 (Purchase Order)
    If I dsiplay Cenvat Clearing Acct, for Document Type ED system display's the P.O. Number as Purchasing Doc; But for RE document system does not display P.O. Number & Auto clearing does not happen
    Can you any one guide how to clear this cenvat clearing account automatically
    Regards
    Sandeep

    Hi,
    is your GL account defined as 'Automatic postings' by FS00? Please, check and remake your process.
    Regards

  • Vendor number in FBL3N and FAGLb03 - GRIR clearing account

    Hi,
    I have added a special field BSEG-LIFNR and when i run above reports, it is showing vendor number only against doc type WE and not against any other document types.
    I wanted this facility to be available primarily to track GRIR account postings.
    Can any one help me on this why only a particular document type shows vendor number and not the others.
    Regards,
    Rajanikanth

    If your Purchase Orders are set up to be a 3way match then it is at the time of the Goods Receipt (WE) that the items are expensed.  So if you are looking up the expense GL account then you will only see the vendor field populated on those line items where there was a GR done.  If you are looking up GR/IR clearing account GL Accounts (usually a liability account) then the vendor field is populated for both the GR and IR transactions on those GL Accounts.  That is at least my understanding of how that field populates.  I'm not sure if there are any user exits that would allow us to change that or not.
    Cindy

  • Accounting Doc is created and it is in RSA3, but not loaded into BW side ?

    Hi all,
        One Accounting Document (of Credit Memo type) has been created with Tcode VF01 and this document exists in Extractor Checker (RSA3) and BSEG & BKPF tables and it has the corresponding Billing Document (VBELN) details in those tables. The Document with VA03 the Status for Sales Doc & Billing Doc is Cleared, but for the Accounting Doc is 'Not Cleared'. We have loaded the delta with 0FI_GL_4 Extractor in to an ODS, but this record is not coming into BW. Why it is missing ? Is it sitting somewhere and waiting for some other process, PLEASE ???
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Venkat.

    Hi Sam,
       There are no Selections in the InfoPackage.
       As you said, as default this extractor pulls records a day old. This record was created yesterday and it should be available today in RSA7, isn't it? But, it is NOT in RSA7. I thought that if it is in RSA7 then I could load the Delta again to get the records that were created yesterday. Does it require any other process to move them into RSA7, PLEASE?
    Thanks,
    Venkat.

  • Doc reversed, Clear FI doc manually_MR8M

    Dear All,
    I have posted the invoice to diff vendor, So i cancelled the inv in mr8m & when i saved the doc its giving the mas as ** doc reversed,clear FI doc manually** What exactly it means ? Now again i need to post the invoice to diff vendor, Pls let me know before posting the inv again, what i need to do ?
    regds,
    CB

    Hi
    When you have posted a document accounting document would have got created and when you cancelled the document reversal entry would have got created. Although the vendor balance will be zero there will be two line items in the vendor account one debit and one credit. You need to select both the items and clear through transaction code F-44. It will not stop you from proceeding with posting of another invoice document.
    Regards,
    Lakshmanan Krishnan

  • Differ in Exch appears while clearing account 1212 where no forecurren used

    Hi All,
    Please help me on this issue,
    Difference in Exchange appears while clearing account 1212000 where no foreign currency is used.
    Problem description: as one of my activities is clearing of account 1212000. On this account loan interests and its payment are recorded. All amounts are posted in EUR. No DIE should be recognized and while clearing this account there should be no impact on P&L:
    However while clearing (doc no 20000503801 Difference in exchange in amount of 13.567,40 EUR (equal to 18.336,73 USD) were posted automatically on account 5432100.
    As I have noticed while August closing this Diference in exchange will be automatically reversed late evening while valuation report is running:
    I have two questions regarding this issue:
    What is the reason that Difference in exchange  appears for transactions performed in one currency. Is it designed on purpose or is it a spin-off effect of performed upgrade? Before upgrade there was not such an issue. 
    1.In case if these Difference in exchange remains will it be always reversed automatically while valuation?
    Thanks in advance
    Nandha
    Edited by: nandhasapfi on Sep 28, 2011 7:11 AM

    Hi Raghavendra,
    Yes, the SAP note is very helpful and it is indeed due to the one of the tax condition being processed and therefore its tax code flow down to the other non tax items.
    I have tried to shift up the conditon type before the tax condition in the procedure, but i realised that it generate billing errors.
    Initially, the sequence in my PP is
    270     0     ZGX1     GST Pseudo 1
    280     0     ZGSX     GST Exclusive
    290     0     ZGXA     GST Absorb
    300     0     ZGX2     GST Pseudo 2
    310     0     ZGX3     GST Pseudo Diff.
    The tax code comes from ZGSX, which is created as a tax condition type using ZGST as reference.
    I tried to shift ZGX2 to step 275 below ZGX1 so that it will not inherit the tax code from ZGSX, but it gives billing error.
    I tried moving ZGX1 down to step 295, but it also give billing errors.
    When I removed the reference to ZGST for ZGX1, and change the calculation type to formula, it removes the billing errors. But I got zero values for both ZGX1 and ZGX2, even if i read table with key KSCHL = 'ZGSX'. I tried 'ZGST' with no success also. Good news is, the tax code in ZGX2 is gone.
    Strangely, if i change the condition type of ZGX2 to reference to ZGST, and use the same formula as ZGX1, it does not gives billing error. But ZGX1 continue to be empty.
    Can someone help me on this?
    Thank you!
    Albert Lee

Maybe you are looking for

  • Creation of Secondary Index

    Hi... Scenario: I have loaded BX and BF as per practice. However, i am not getting current stock values for materials which had 0 opening stock when BX was pulled (I did not select checkbox 'Zero stock to be transferred'). Note 823951 suggests execut

  • 7.0 to 8.1 migration

    Has anybody migrated webflows from 7.0 to 8.1. What is the servlet to be used instead of PortalWebflowServlet? how to substitute AbstractPortalProcessor, InputprocessorSupport and com.bea.p13n.appflow.exception.ProcessingException. thanks..

  • How to add link to flash file (using AS 3)?

    Hi all, I have created a Flash banner ad for our company that is to be hosted on another website. This banner ad needs to have a link added to it, within the Flash file. This link will take users straight to our website but is also for the purpose of

  • Need help recreating this in Oracle (Temporary Table and a Cursor)

    Hey all, My client has asked me to see if it's possible to move his SQL Queries into Oracle, and then move EVERYTHING off of MSSQL into this new oracle environment. The problem is, I wrote the entire MSSQL system, and i know nothing about Oracle. Bas

  • ACE MAXCONNS issue

    /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in