Cleared Invoice should not allow to cancel.

Dear All
I have posted one invoice with reference to sales order. My finance team also cleared that invoice. Now System is allowing me to cancel the invoice document.But i dont want to allow people to cancel cleared invoice.
How to achieve this. Kindly suggest me.
Shobana

Hi lakshmi
I have done as per your suggestion.It is working fine for fully cleared invoice. But i want the same restricition to partially cleared sales invoice also. Is there any provision is available.
Kindly guide me.
Thanks
Shobana

Similar Messages

  • Once payment received  for bill system should not allow to cancel

    Hi  Experts ,
    we have created  commercial  invoice  and posted to fi document and    payment  received  from party.but when  we  try to  cancel  the same billing document system allowing  to  cancel the document.So Client  requirement  is once  payment received from party system it  should not  allow to cancel the billing document.
    Please  give  your  valuable suggestions on the same ...
    regards...
    MM

    Hello,
    In the Tx VOFA for the billing type to be cancelled(Ex F2), please
    fill the field Copying Requirements(V_TVFK-GRBED_S) with '29'.
    This routine prevents the cancellation of the billing documents which
    have been cleared.
    Regards,
    Raghavendra YN

  • Invoice cancellation should not allow for closed periods

    Dear All,
    We will be closing the posting period for each quarter,and declare the sales figure.,what ever the invoices we have made should not be cancelled in that quarter.,i want the a check in the system that if any cancellation during this quarter which is closed ,should not allow to cancel the invoice.ofcourse the accounting document will not be generated as the posting period is closed but still the invoice is generated and blocked for accounting.i want the creation of billing document should be blocked.
    i Know this can be achieved By defining new routine in VOFA and assign it in VTFL., but is there any standerd routine there which will solve my purpose or i hae to go for new routine.
    REgards
    Shakthi

    Hello Shakthi,
    In standard, there is note 180756.
    Unfortunately the note 180756 just helps for billing creation, it is not useful for
    billing cancellation.
    The note 180756 suggests to develop a copy requirement routine checking
    the periods.
    But in VF11 copy requirement routine are not performed.
    Unfortunately there is not a ready-to-use workaround.
    In transaction VOFA is possible to define a "copy requirement" routine,
    which is performed when the invoice is cancelled.
    You could create a routine doing the necessary check, and put
    it here.
    Regards,
    Alex

  • Residual payment should not allow more than Vendor Invoice

    Hi,
    Eg: Vendor has booked invoice 5000 INR, when user make payment through F-53 or F-58 through "Residual" payment user can pay more than invoice 5002 INR and below accounting entry is posting.
    Bank Cr 5002 INR
            To  Vendor Dr 5000 INR (Invoice amount)
            To  Vendor Dr 02    INR  Excess than invoice 
    Business requirement is system should not allow pay more than invoice amount. How to control suggestion would be appreciated.
    I have done below settings for your understanding here system configuration.
    1. OBA3: Under "Permitted Payment difference" zero for Gain , Loss , Amount, Percent & Adjust Discount By  However "Permitted Payment Differences for Automatic write-Off(Function code AD)" zero.
    2. OBA4: Cash discount per line item: Zero and Under "Permitted Payment difference" Revenues, Expense, Percent & Cash discount  put Zero.
    Regards,
    Babu.

    Hi Prashant,
    I have restricted many fields to use through screen variant now user can not pay more than Invoice amount except through Residual payment process.
    Client side management strongly says that they want to use Partial and Residual payment process options but user should not allow pay more than invoice amount.
    If any solution please guide me.
    Regards,
    Babu.

  • Delivery is invoiced fully so system should not allow to create 2nd invoic

    hi Expert,
    my issue is, once invoice is created for delivery.
    system should not allow user to create
    second invoice for same delivery number.
    where to check the confiurtion to stop such
    behaviour
    waiting for your reply
    thanks
    Alicia

    Hi Alicia
    In the copy control from delivery to invoice - T code VTFL
    you can maintain the copy routines. try maintaining routine
    3-- which is delivery reatled header
    4-- which is delivery related item
    also at item level copy control you may add the check in billign quantites
    this would stop formc reating another invocie
    Hope this helps
    Thanks
    Akasha

  • System should not allow to delete PO line Item after GR/IR

    Hi,
    I am working on a SAP Retail Implementation project.
    Currently the system is allowing us to delete the PO line items after doing GR or IR against that PO line item. But the clients requirement is that the system should not allow to delete PO line item after doing GR/IR.
    We are using Account Assignment Category-N, Item Category-S.
    Please let me know if you have the solution for this requirement.
    Thanks in advance
    Thanks & Regards,
    Suresh

    Hi,
    Standard SAP will not allowed the PO to be deleted once it was GR done. The controlled is on the attributes of message to set as "E"
    Message no. 06115
    But if invoiced takes place, the is the point that PO can be deleted.
    You have to do have a Enhancement using MM06E005, insert you logic here to check PO history tables like EKBE, then check if invoice " Q" (BEWTP) exist, the PO cannot be deleted once the user delete the PO line and SAVE it. Ask you developer to help you on the following coding.
    Use MM06E005 and EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
    IF SY-TCODE = 'ME22N'.
    IF sy-ucomm = 'MESAVE' OR SY-UCOMM = 'YES'..
    LOOP AT TEKPO.
    IF TEKPO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
    SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR1 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'E'.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR2 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'Q'.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    Regards,

  • Restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO

    Hi
    how to restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO
    if the material Excisable user can bale to select the No Excise entry tab in MIGO . my requirement .... if the Pop come Please enter Excise Invoice number and Excise Invoice Date user should not change the No Excise how to restrict pls advise me
    @sakhi

    These are the options provided by SAP keeping in mind Indian Scenario. Sometimes, vendor forget to send excise invoice copy with the material, in such case, you can select 'Only Part I'.
    Even if you have maintain vendor excise details & material excise details (By mistake) in J1ID, system will throw an error message, excise invoice value is zero. In such case, we can select option 'No excise entry'.
    Your requirement can't be fulfilled in standard way. Even if you go for any Z- developement, you will lose the option.

  • Solution for Bug 13412084: RESTRICT PAYMENT: IT SHOULD NOT ALLOW PAYMENT BE

    http://attiqahmed.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/solution-for-bug-13412084-restrict-payment-it-should-not-allow-payment-before-invoice-accrual/

    hello sir Octavio
    Im sorry.. I failed to tell you that our encoder of invoices is separate from the one who entry for payments.
    Therefore, the encoder uses the invoices batches[(N) Invoices>Entry>Invoice Batches] whereas the Paymaster(the one who entered payments?) uses the Payments [Payments>Entry>Payments]
    By the way your suggestion did work to disable the Pay in Full checkbox.. but i decided to get rid of the actions button for the encoder.. and another person will be handling the validation and create accounting having such access.
    So what i wanted is that the paymaster wouldn't be able see among the LOV of invoices at the Payments Form if its not created accounting.
    I wanna make sure that all invoices are created accounting.
    thank you so much for the understanding..:-)
    Emgee

  • If there is no accounting document; SAP should not allow users to print

    Dear Gurus,
    Is there a standard way that,
    --if there is no accounting document; SAP should not allow users to print invoice?
    How can I do it?
    Regards,

    You can either use Tcode NACE for output procedure pr follow following path in SPRO:
    IMG - SD - Basic Functions - Output control - Output Determination - Maintain Output Determination for Billing Documents - Maintain Output Determination Procedure
    There for your output procedure used for the desired output type maintain requirement routine as 62 : Billing doc released to acctng.
    This requirement is met if the billing document is complete checking the header, pricing, and all items and has already been passed to financial accounting. The requirement also checks that the document is not relevant for an invoice list. This requirement can be assigned to billing document output condition types that should only be processed when the billing document is complete and forwarded to accounting. This requirement can only be used with billing documents.
    Regards
    JP

  • ]The requirement is  that users should not allow  them to save if the indic

    hi guys
    when  u are doing GR in  the excise tab page  if u find an <b>icon (yellow one</b>) called <b>more data</b>  if  u click that one  u  go  to other screen where u will find a <b>tab page </b> named <b>miscellaneous</b> ther u can see <b>MRP indicator</b> check.
    <b>The requirement is  that users should not allow  them to save if the indicator is not ticked</b>.
    help me  guys
    kiran

    You can either use Tcode NACE for output procedure pr follow following path in SPRO:
    IMG - SD - Basic Functions - Output control - Output Determination - Maintain Output Determination for Billing Documents - Maintain Output Determination Procedure
    There for your output procedure used for the desired output type maintain requirement routine as 62 : Billing doc released to acctng.
    This requirement is met if the billing document is complete checking the header, pricing, and all items and has already been passed to financial accounting. The requirement also checks that the document is not relevant for an invoice list. This requirement can be assigned to billing document output condition types that should only be processed when the billing document is complete and forwarded to accounting. This requirement can only be used with billing documents.
    Regards
    JP

  • Price Increase - not allowed to cancel COMPLAINT

    I am currently speaking to Nidhi who told me that I wasn't allowed to cancel my services due to the price increase (my notice was part of my online bill - and I couldn't read it as it was the Welsh version!!)
    After telling her that it quite clearly states on the website that I CAN she tells me I've misunderstood the wording and I'm in a contract which I can't cancel!!
    After stating that I will stay on the phone to 9pm to speak to her supervisor to clarify the situation if that's what it takes, as either the website or herself is lying.
    After a quick 'confer' with a colleague I've been put through to the team to cancel my services.
    Is this customer service acceptable? Bullying your customers into staying with you?
    I already have a hefty complaint going to BT regarding my excessive and unexplained broadband usage for September. This will be getting added to it.

    jipjon wrote:
    Hello,
    This is just happeneing to me too. 20GB average for 18months then I renew my contract for another 12months on 8th September and surpirse suprise 50GB used in September and already 7GB in first two days of October means I'm heading for over 100GB this month! Wow. If it is not a scam of sorts they are not taking responsibility for any problem. 
    I'll keep asking the questions of them and showing them the evidence my end but unless they look at their end what can we do? Like others I've just renewed so feel trapped with this for year. Vert stressful and a shame as had great experience for my intial 18 month contract. 
    But has nothing to do with a price increase;
    Re: Price Increase - not allowed to cancel COMPLAINT
    toekneem
    http://www.no2nuisancecalls.net
    (EASBF)

  • Excise invoice should not get created without PGI

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where the billing document is being generated by the customer without PGI after creation of outbound delivery for exports. (This is as per customer's requirement - Copy control maintained in VTFL for the same - copying requirements 11 )
    This creates a situation - excise invoice can be created without PGI - which creates problems for customer. This should not happen.
    Customer wants a check during the excise invoice creation - excise invoice should not get created if PGI has not been done.
    Kindly advise as to how this can be done.
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

    Dear Saravanan
    Two options are there
    -  in your existing routine itself, you can specify the control in such a way that unless the preceding document is PGId
    -  apply excise user exits like J_1I7_USEREXIT_EXCISE_BEF_SAVE to achieve the requirement.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Excise Invoice should not get created without J1ID data for all material

    Dear All,
    We  have a requirement that excise invoice should not get generated unless chapter ID data is maintained for all the materials in the invoice.( when there is more than one item and chapter id is not maintained for all the items)
    At present excise invoice is getting generated for single item which has chapter ID maintained and  the items without chapter ID data are left out from the excise invoice. This results in an incorrect invoice.
    We want to ensure that excise invoice is not created, unless all the items in the billing document have chapter ID maintained.
    Kindly advise as to how this can be done.
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

    Dear Muralidhar, Lakshmipathi,
    Thanks for the solution.
    I have been able to solve the problem using the user exit mentioned by you.
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

  • After creation of PO system should not allow to change the price in PO

    Hi There,
    In my scenario once PO is created then after send to vendor PO print document,Users are changing the price in PO.so system should not allow to change the price in PO once PO got saved.
    So please advice.

    Hi,
    you could set in customizing for field selection keys the net price      
    to display for ME22N so that changes can not be made         
    (transaction OLME -> purchase order -> Define Screen Layout at Document Level).
    Please check that you have set all the relevant field selection      
    groups to display: AKTV, ME22, ME22N... (read and apply note 30316)                                                                               
    Other workaround is try to do by yourself with the badi                      
    ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST and send your own error message.    
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order

    Our clients need is that without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order.
    We are using CORK,cor6 and MB31 My need is to apply user exit in all cases.
    I got input from sdn User exit:-PPCO0006 Function module Exit_SAPLCOZF_003
    INCLUDE ZXCO1U06
    I need to activate this only during confirmation.ie confirmation to be avoided if cost is not released.
    Regards,
    Pert

    Hi,
    You are right. For preventing confirmation in case std cost estimate release is not available you need to do enhancement. You can check for following exit along with exit which you mentioned in your post :
    Enhancement     CONFPI05
    EXIT_SAPLCORF_405 - Process Ord. Conf.: Cust.-Specific Enhancements when Saving
    INCLUDE ZXCOFU10
    Check either of the enhancements which may fulfill your business requirement.
    Regards,
    Tejas

Maybe you are looking for

  • File adapter : Do not poll if directory does not exist

    Hi people ! I have a BPEL process that takes files as Input messages. I use a file adapter to do that. It works well but I would like to avoid polling the directory if it does not exist, do you know how to control if the directory actually exists ? H

  • Page flow scope questions

    Hi guys, I'm continuing my investigation of ADF Faces 11 and have a few questions about pageFlowScope: 1. When are objects removed from pageFlowScope, aside from a session ending? Do they need to be removed manually or are they removed when they are

  • MULTIPLE USB SOUND BLASTER in ONE SYS

    Hi there I have a project that I should use 2 till 4 USB sound blaster for input data and store it . I have bought 4 Audigy USB , for this Sound blaster Windows can not load driver for more than card and for the rest make an error and makes them disa

  • Alternate to 'IN' ?????

    I have the query SELECT PLL_PACKET_STR FROM PIB_PACKETS_LOG WHERE PLL_SEQ_NO > '1' AND PLL_CLIENT_ID IN(SELECT PAA_CLIENT_ID FROM PIB_ADMINCLIENT_ACTIVE WHERE PAA_ADMIN_ID = '1') ORDER BY PLL_SEQ_NO which is having high cost is there any better alter

  • JDialog position

    Hello, I wonder how the position of a JDialog is decided. In the following code it is positioned below the parent frame. But when using the commented line with setLocationRelativeTo(DialogTest.this), the dialog is nicely placed in the parent's center