Clearing amount is more than tax base in Invoice

Hi Friends,
I am facing one issue at the time of Clearing through t.code F-54. I have made payment 10000/- and deduct TDS 1% on Base amount 5000/-. We have booked vendor invoice with same amount 10000/- and deduct TDS 1% on base amount 50000/-. Now we are doing clearing F-54 and simulate the document then it is showing error message " Clearing Amount is more than tax base in Invoice" Message no Message no. 8I000.
Please give your valuable suggestion on it.
Thanks & Regards,
Pankaj

Hi Pankaj,
There is problem while clearing throgh F-54 is just because of imbalce between the Down payment and the invoice amount.
In down Payment for deduction of tds calculation base is 5,000 and in invoice the calculation base is 50,000.
F-54 is to clear the vendor invoice with same amount.
Please check .
Hope this will help you,
Thanks,
Deepa

Similar Messages

ORA-01776: cannot modify more than one base table through a join view

I have created EO based on a database view than consists of two tables, and only one is updateable.
When I try to update a row using EO, I got a following message: "ORA-01776-cannot modify more than one base table through a join view"
In Forms, this issue is resolved by setting "Query Only" property of non-updateable items to "True".
Is it possible to do something like that in ADF BC?
Thanks

Thanks for answer.
When I set "updateable" property to "Never", that attribute is protected from any change.
I'm sorry for incomplete usecase.
I have set up a list of value on that attribute, because it is a lookup field for another table and I need to get an ID from that table.
Basically, I need that attribute to be updateble for BC, but not for database.
Edited by: MarioK on Oct 13, 2011 9:28 AM

Cannot modify more than one base table through a join view

hi guys, my current problem is that i have a datablock based on a view, now all the fields bar 1 are updateable, but this one field that is obtained through a join is displayed, the user can enter data in this field which then pupulates other fields which are required, but this specific field should not be updated. Is there an option to state this as i keep getting the error:
cannot modify more than one base table through a join view
Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks.

the user can enter data in this field which then pupulates other fields So, using the value of "this field" you then query the rest of the fields? Can you show us the code you use to populate the rest of the fields?
but this specific field should not be updatedHave you tried setting the "Query Only" property of the field to "Yes" and the other DML properties (Ins, Upd, Del) to No?
Also, what is your Forms version?
Thanks,
Craig B-)
If someone's response is helpful or correct, please mark it accordingly.

Payment amount is more than Purchase Order Amount

Dear FI Expert,
We are getting the error "Payment amount is more than Purchase Order
Amount" w hen a single payment through one check is being made against 2
purchase orders.
System is considering only the 1st purchase order and disallowing
payment.
For e.g. 2 Purchase Orders are created w ith 100% DP condition: First
one
for USD 200000 and second one for USD 100000.
2 Dow n Payment requests are created through ME2DP against these 2
Purchase Orders.
At the time of making payment through F-48 by selecting both open items
it takes the reference of only one Purchase Order and generates the
error
"Payment amount is more than Purchase Order Amount."
Please suggest how entry w ill be made in such cases.
Thanks
Kamlesh Jangir

Hi kamlesh,
You are using EHP 4 or higher package. in this case you can use FPDP_CREATE instead of ME2DP.
You can go through Business function LOG_MMFI_P2P
https://websmp109.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=00200682500000002672&_EVENT=DISPLAY&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000122&_HIER_…
Down Payment and Down Payment Request - Purchasing (MM-PUR) - SAP Library
I hope this will be help full
Regards
Raheem

While clearing document has more than 999 line items system not allowing

Hi,
We have an issue with FI-Customer Clearing. While clearing the error is appearing as document has more than 999 line items. after the detailed checking we found that there are lots of line items posted to Real Exchange Rate diff that to COPA.
To reduce the maximum line items SAP is suggesting to deactivate the Real exchange rate diff.postings to COPA.
Regards,
R.Kumar.

Hi,
Please check SAP Note 1353125
Thanks

Amount booking more than budget value in project

Hi,
I had maintained the budget for 10000k.Project is allowing more than 10000k to post.please can you tell where should i set the control.
Thanks
Cra

Dear Cra,
Enter OPS9 transaction for Budget Profile.In that ensure,
Activation Type must be "1" Automatic activation during budget allocation
Overall & Releases check boxes must be Ticked.
If you are doing Overall & Annual budgeting then, Total Values & Annual Values check boxes must be Ticked.
Then, Define 3 Tolerance Limits
Click on New Entries,
Select Controlling Area, Budget Profile, Tr. Grp "++" All activity groups, Action 1Warning / 2Warning with MAIL to person responsible / 3 Error message with Usage 80%, 90% & 100%.
In this step you enter the tolerance limits for availability control.
Availability control can identify budget overruns in a project at an early stage and initiates various actions.
You activate availability control for a certain budget profile. You can specify one or more tolerance limits for each activity group for a budget profile.
Selected actions (warning, warning with mail to person responsible for project, error message) are triggered when these limits are reached.
If you do above settings then system will not allow you to spend more than your Budgeted Figures.
Regards,
Sandeep

More than one PO for Invoice

Can we have more than one PO posted in for an Invoice. Means Invoice having multiple PO's
Thanks

Yes, it is possible.
In MIRO, click on "More Allocation Criteria" button besides Purchase Order field
here go to search help of PO in the Pop-up screen and enter the vendor code and company code and execute
Now select the POs and click on "Copy" button and now click on "Adopt" button in the pop-up screen
It will copy all the POs and then follow the normal procedure of LIV.
Also refer following link for this;
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/a8/b99f58452b11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm

More than 5 base stations...?

I could use some advicce in setting up what has become a rather complex airport network...
Due to the floorplan of our apartment, it's extremely thick (1 meter, stone) walls, the limited location of available sockets and cables (DSL and ethernet) and other various user needs, we need 7 base stations to make our wireless network fit our needs and desires. We need 5 AEBS (n-type, square) plus 2 Airport Express Base Stations for music.
One AEBS will be wired via ethernet to another AEBS (to extend the reach to a far corner).
Ideally, the network should look something like this...
AEBS - 1 (main) --> wireless iMac user
|
wds
|
AEBS - 2 (to extend reach to 3 & 4)
| |
wds wds
| |
AEBS-3 & AEBS-4 --> (wireless MacBook user and USB printer)
| |
ethernet wds
cable |
| AirPort Express 1-->(iTunes with Apple HiFi)
|
AEBS 5 --> Apple TV, MacBook User
|
wds
|
Airport Express 2 --> iTunes to stereo
questions:
How can I set this up?
or specifically:
Do I set up 1 Main station and 6 Remotes (there seems to be a limit of 4 remotes?)
Do I set up AEBS 2 & 3 as Relay Stations or do Relay stations need to be wired to the main via ethernet (i.e., not wireless)?
What is the difference between "Participate in a Network" and "Extend a Network" when do I use one over the other?
any help appreciated, thanks... I agree this may be a job for a paid consultant, but I live overseas where there are none available, otherwise I would be willing to pay for some help...
kind regards,

Duane,
sorry my scematic got messed up by the formatting...
I'll try it a different way...
--> means wds
~~~ means ethernet cable
* means user (iMac, MacBook, Apple TV)
.... means ignore (no tab allowed)
AEBS 1 (*)--> AEBS 2} --> AEBS 3 ~~~ AEBS 5 (*) --> Airport Express-iTunes
.................................}--> AEBS 4 (*)--> Airport Express-iTunes
does this help explain? yes, I know I'll loose some speed, but haven't many choices here in Italy
The reason I think there is a limit of four remotes off of a main base station is that after entering 4 remotes on the WDS page, the add goes grey and won't let more remotes be added...
thank you...

Splitting the amount to more than one vendor in PO

Hi experts,
I am into a scenario in which a PO will be issued to a party (which is having tie up with some other party) and will produce a single bill in which a portion of total amount is to be paid to the party having tie up with mian PO vendor.
Apart from that on few heads CST is to be charged and for other heads service tax in a single PO. we are using TAXINJ procedure
please suggest if there is any standard procedure to cater my requirement
Regards,
PAwan Khurana

Hi,
You can change the Vendor for making payment in MIRO --> Details tab --> Inv party field, irrespective of maintained in PO
Regards,
Vikas

Information message "Down Payment more than invoice amount"

Hi Experts,
After creating down payment request while making down payment,one information message shows in status bar "Down Payment amount is more than invoice amount"
can anyone tell me why that message popup everytime?
Thanks in advance
Sanjay

Dear,
Ideally this message should appear at the time F-54 transaction when down payment is greater or lesser than invoice amount.
But as you said it is appearing at time of F-48 so please check purchase order is entered and invoice has been done for that invoice with variances.
If query does not belong to any of above, please elaborate the scenario and also provide message number.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Report - shares of more than one landlord

Dear experts,
I have got a requirement for a report from RE-FX that would give me information about shares (in % or in absolute amount) when more than one landlord, but when we do pay only to one of the owners(landlords). We need such a report, because some of the owners are eligible to Witholding taxes and my company should produce a report for the paid WH tax and present it in the tax authorities. We are renting business centres, that are created first as rental units and then assigned to a contract. The contract is signed with all the owners of the property, but we do technically pay to only one account (one of the owners). Therefore, i cant assign all of the owners as BP and assign flow types to each of them in my contract, because i dont want to produce postings.
As a possible solution, i ve been thinking of doing this in the rental unit and lock the data for postings there. Do you think it would work? Have you got any other ideas of how this could be fulfilled within RE-FX.
Many thanks in advance.

Why not create a condition with statistical for the BP which do not pay?

AirTunes with more than 5 Express

Has anyone tried to manage AirTunes with more than 5 Airport Express Base stations at the same time?
Apple says that not more than 5 bases are supported but I need to use at least 8 bases for a job.
Thanks for the answers!
Mac Pro, PBook G4 15", iBook G4 12" Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Hi PopKorn,
I would suggest that Apple has said 5 for a good reason. Since the music is not distributed by multicast, it has to send out 5 streams of high fidelity music over a transmission medium that will do 54Mbps at most, and over longer distances, bandwidth decreases.
Your project sounds interesting, but I'm not sure the Airport Express will be able to do exactly what you want.

Submit submit a large number of task to a thread pool (more than 10,000)

i want to submit a large number of task to a thread pool (more than 10,000).
Since a thread pool take runnable as input i have to create as many objects of Runnable as the number of task, but since the number of task is very large it causes the memory overflow and my application crashes.
Can you suggest me some way to overcome this problem?

Ravi_Gupta wrote:
I have to serve them infinitely depending upon the choice of the user.
Take a look at my code (code of MyCustomRunnable is already posted)
public void start(Vector<String> addresses)
searching = true;What is this for? Is it a kind of comment?
>
Vector<MyCustomRunnable> runnables = new Vector<MyCustomRunnable>(1,1);
for (String address : addresses)
try
runnables.addElement(new MyCustomRunnable(address));
catch (IOException ex)
ex.printStackTrace();
}Why does MyCustomRunnable throw an IOException? Why is using up resources when it hasn't started. Why build this vector at all?
>
//ThreadPoolExecutor pool = new ThreadPoolExecutor(100,100,50000L,TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS,new LinkedBlockingQueue());
ExecutorService pool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(100);You have 100 CPUs wow! I can only assume your operations are blocking on a Socket connection most of the time.
>
boolean interrupted = false;
Vector<Future<String>> futures = new Vector<Future<String>>(1,1);You don't save much by reusing your vector here.
for(int i=1; !interrupted; i++)You are looping here until the thread is interrupted, why are you doing this? Are you trying to generate loading on a remote server?
System.out.println("Cycle: " + i);
for(MyCustomRunnable runnable : runnables)Change the name of you Runnable as it clearly does much more than that. Typically a Runnable is executed once and does not create resources in its constructor nor have a cleanup method.
futures.addElement((Future<String>) pool.submit(runnable));Again, it unclear why you would use a vector rather than a list here.
>
for(Future<String> future : futures)
try
future.get();
catch (InterruptedException ex)
interrupted = true;If you want this to break the loop put the try/catch outside the loop.
ex.printStackTrace();
catch (ExecutionException ex)
ex.printStackTrace();If you are generating a load test you may want to record this kind of failure. e.g. count them.
futures.clear();
try
Thread.sleep(60000);Why do you sleep even if you have been interrupted? For better timing, you should sleep, before check if you futures have finished.
catch(InterruptedException e)
searching = false;again does nothing.
System.out.println("Thread pool terminated..................");
//return;remove this comment. its dangerous.
break;why do you have two way of breaking the loop. why not interrupted = true here.
searching = false;
System.out.println("Shut downing pool");
pool.shutdownNow();
try
for(MyCustomRunnable runnable : runnables)
runnable.close(); //release resources associated with it.
catch(IOException e)put the try/catch inside the loop. You may want to ignore the exception but if one fails, the rest of the resources won't get cleaned up.
The above code serve the task infinitely untill it is terminated by user.
i had created a large number of runnables and future objects and they remain in memory until
user terminates the operation might be the cause of the memory overflow.It could be the size of the resources each runnable holds. Have you tried increasing your maximum memory? e.g. -Xmx512m

How to all customer who are having total sales value more than 10000 usd??

Dear all,
How can we see all customers that are having total sales value is more than a specific amount (Ex: more than 10000 USD)
How to list all customers who's total sales value is more than 10, 000 USD.
Please help me to find the right solution for this problem.
Your help will be highly appreciated.
Best wishes,
Raghu ram

Dear Raghu ram
Go to VF05N, give just Sales Organization, distribution channel and execute. You will get the entire sales details including currency. Sort in descending order by selecting the value column.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Mail saved on my Mac more than 3 months old? Poof, gone!

I switched to Leopard Mail several months ago, love it, sync it with AOL IMAP, works across the board on all my devices. Then today I noticed that any mail saved before mid-December had mysteriously evaporated from the "On My Mac" folders. Is there some sort of option that clears out anything more than 90 days old? How can I make it stop?

Check the "Mail" preferences and account settings. In there you have the option to remove deleted mail after a given time (1 week is default, I think) and the same goes for junk mail. I dont think there's a specific option for inbox mail, but check your "rules" to see if there's anything there that's deleting your mail. Do you have any smart mailboxes that contain old email? Perhaps you inadvertently used something like that and deleted the email. By itself, Mail should keep downloaded messages for as long as you want. If they're still in your inbox, however, and they're deleted from the server, then they'll disappear from your inbox. I've found it best to have a separate, local inbox I call "Old" and everything older than 1 month gets tossed in that folder. I've set that up as a rule, and periodically run the rule on all messages so they get put there.

Clearing amount is more than tax base in Invoice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for