Cluster Apex MS's across multiple nodes for load balancing?

Can Cluster Apex MS's across multiple nodes for load balancing? If Yes/No, any supportive doc's will be much appreciated.
Here is what I did ..........
I tried multiple MS's on different nodes for Apex Domain (clustered)
Deployed apex.war, i.war with targets pointing to cluster.
Apex listener techstack is shared filesystem $HOME/apex, where apex-config.xml and bdb are available
Anyone of the MS's whichever started up first is locking up bdb and 500 server shows up when internal workspace is being launched with host specific url, where as it works fine for the host which actually locked up bdb (first MS that was started)
2nd MS shows errors as below in log files ..
Caused By: com.sleepycat.je.EnvironmentLockedException: (JE 4.0.103)$HOME/apex/bdb The environment cannot be locked for single writer access. ENV_LOCKED: The je.lck file could not be locked. Environment is invalid and must be closed.
Its expected behavior until here .....
++++ I tried something to get it working ++++
Whilst both MS's are up and running, delete $HOME/apex/bdb but let apex-config,xml be as it is...now the internal workspace urls for both hosts work fine. I logged into host specific urls and navigated, created/edited users.,etc and it is all looking good but it did not create new bdb directory under $HOME/apex ...!!
Having said its working fine, the same issue repeats after the MS's bounce. So I did put a command line to delete bdb dir once the MS comes up to avoid the issue but really not sure if this is the right way at all?
Geek's ...awaiting your advice!!

Hey there,
I managed to fulfill my requirement..
If its a cluster on same machine or across machines, this should work
1. Login to machine, cd $DOMAIN_HOME
2. mkdir -p Apex_lsn_config/AdminServer Apex_lsn_config/<MS1> Apex_lsn_config/<MS2> # MS1 and MS2 are the Managed Server names as appropriate
#If you are planning for cluster spawning MS's across machines, make sure you create the dir's on step 2 for each machine respectively. (in my case $DOMAIN_HOME is not shared)
3. Copy apex-config.xml from the /tmp/apex or whatever location you have it currently to Apex_lsn_config/<MS1> Apex_lsn_config/<MS2>
4. cd $DOMAIN_HOME/bin; cp -p SetDomainEnv.sh SetDomainEnv.sh.orig #Backup the file
5. Append -Djava.io.tmpdir in SetDomainEnv.sh as below for JAVA_OPTIONS # Do it on both machine if you are not sharing DOMAIN_HOME and planning cluster across machines
-Djava.io.tmpdir=$DOMAIN_HOME/APEX_CONFIG/${SERVER_NAME}
Hint: Search for "iterativeDev" and append the same line with -Djava.jo.tmpdir
6. Modify "java.io.tmpdir" from the web.xml file of apex.war as below and re-deploy the war
<context-param>
     <param-name>config.dir</param-name>
     <param-value>${java.io.tmpdir}</param-value>
</context-param>
7. Bounce Weblogic Admin and Manged Servers. Make sure to tail the Managed Server log to see apex-config.xml is picked from the new location.
8. Brew a Coffee for yourself :)
- You find the instructions on creating a cluster from weblogic documentation, the steps mentioned above are only to overcome the bdb locking issue whilst creating a cluster.
Did it help?
Edited by: Oratime on Mar 25, 2013 2:44 AM

Similar Messages

  • SSP5: Using multiple JVM for load balance performance?

    Sun 12 MAY 2002
    Apps 11.0.3
    SSP5 patchset I
    HP UX 11.0
    db 8.1.7.2 (64-bit)
    Load 60 concurrent sessions, each spawning 2.5 - 3 http connections.
    CPU 3:750Mhz
    RAM 8G
    Is anybody using multiple JVM for load balance?
    What is your ratio of JVM to concurrent iP sessions?
    Are you running Apache/Jserv on a server with any other applications, or is Apache by itself?
    If you are not using JVM, how many httpd processes do you get before Apache implodes? We stopped in the water at 90 httpd processes, but performance degraded starting at 70 sessions.
    Thx - Don

    Using Web Cache to load balance servlet-based Forms (6i and 9i) is unofficially supported. I say "unofficially" because we have actual customers doing it and getting support, but the 2 development teams (Forms and Web Cache) haven't actually done any integration testing of this sort of configuration yet. For your case, please contact your Support rep and ask what was done to use Web Cache as a load balancer for Forms6i at METRO in Germany. The Forms product managemment team is writing up a white paper to describe how to do it, but until then, you'll need to go through Support. Please contact me if you want more information.

  • Skip lot across multiple batches for same material

    Hi,
    I am looking for a way to control skip lots across multiple batches for the same material.
    We need to do a quality check in production after a certain quantity produced (on a machine, for a material). My idea was to do skip lots (for GR)  until we reach a threshold (say 10.000 pcs) and then do an inspection for the next GR for that material.
    Any ideas how to set that up?
    Thanks for any hint
    Andreas

    Hi mergler,
    Ref to your query pls check this link Stock Posting for Skip Lots
    Thanks in advance

  • CF8/JRun4 Cluster for Load Balancing

    Does anyone have an example of how to set up a CF8/JRun4
    cluster for load balancing?
    I have three servers:
    x004 - Linux - Apache2 (10.0.0.54,10.1.0.54)
    x020 - Linux - JRun4/CF8 (10.0.0.70,10.1.0.70)
    x021 - Linux - JRun4/CF8 (10.0.0.71,10.1.0.71)
    Every server in our network has two network cards. One
    network card is attached to 10.0.x.x which has a gateway to the
    internet and runs at 100Mbps and is firewalled, and the other is
    attached to 10.1.x.x which runs at 1Gbps and is internal with no
    gateway. I'm trying to set it up so web traffic arrives on
    10.0.0.54 into Apache and mod_jrun20 bootstraps a cluster named
    STST using 10.1.0.54 which consists of STST_x020 coldfusion server
    running on x020 and STST_x021 running on x021. I want the
    communications between JRun4 on x020 and x021 to occur on the
    10.1.x.x network and eventhough JRun and ColdFusion will only use
    the 10.1.x.x network I still need the 10.0.x.x network card
    attached for other purposes which require a gateway. I have
    installed JRun4/CF8 about 10 times already and it seems I have no
    control over what network JRun4 clusters on... sometimes it will
    communicate on one, sometimes the other and without being able to
    set which network is being used there always seems to be "network
    error" on at least one of the two CF8 servers. I was able to get
    everything working fine by disabling the network cards on the
    10.0.x.x network and re-installing everything... but as soon as I
    added the network cards back the whole thing was broken again.
    How is this supposed to work? Most of the examples are either
    no clustering or clustering on the same machine with Apache running
    on the same box... I don't see any clustering across machines
    examples.
    How do I install a connector on a web server which doesn't
    have JRun on it and get wsconfig to connect to a multi-machine
    cluster when wsconfig only accepts a single IP address as a host
    and the cluster is not listed?
    How do I get JRun to bind to a specific network card?
    Does this work if I choose a J2EE server other than JRun?
    Any help anyone can provide is greatly appreciated. I'm
    getting close to giving up which means staying on the non-clustered
    environment and figuring out how we can deal with scalability by
    switching to something else.

    The article at
    http://www.adobe.com/go/1e8e9170
    is specific to configuring two or more cluster nodes that reside on
    separate networks, e.g. 10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.2.0/24. (The article
    doesn't state it, but you can only use unicast peers if your
    cluster nodes host a single instance of JRun or multiple instances
    of JRun in the same cluster domain. When performing unicast
    discovery, JRun looks for all Jini groups and not just the cluster
    group.)
    Anyhow, that's not your problem. The simplest solution is you
    haven't enabled the jrun.servlet.jrpp.JRunProxyService service. I'm
    most familiar with the Windows version of JRun, but I'm assuming
    the directory structure is similar across platforms. In
    <jrun_root>/servers/<name>/SERVER-INF/jrun.xml, set the
    deactivated attribute of the jrun.servlet.jrpp.JRunProxyService
    service to false and restart JRun. You should now see JRun
    listening on the appropriate port. (The default for the first
    manually created instance is 51000.) You can limit the proxy
    service to a single interface using the interface attribute.
    If you have enabled the proxy service, verify your security
    settings in <jrun_root>/lib/security.properties. It's usually
    best to limit access to specific hosts. Comment out the
    jrun.subnet.restriction parameter and set the jrun.trusted.hosts to
    the IP address of your web server, e.g. 10.1.0.54.
    Forcing all JRun processes/services to listen on a single
    interface isn't difficult, but it does require modifying quite a
    few configuration files by hand. If you need assistance with that,
    I can elaborate.
    Configuring the JRun module under Apache is pretty
    straightforward. If you're not using virtual hosts, it's very
    simple. If you are using virtual hosts, it's still simple, but your
    JRun configuration can be virtual host-specific.
    On your Apache server, you'll want to create a directory
    structure for the JRun module. I'll assume
    /opt/jrun/lib/wsconfig/1, but you can use anything you want. Once
    the directory structure is created, extract the appropriate JRun
    module from wsconfig.jar to the new directory. You're most likely
    interested in the Apache 2.0 module,
    wsconfig.jar/connectors/apache/intel-linux/prebuilt/mod_jrun20.so.
    Let's assume you've extracted the module to
    /opt/jrun/lib/wsconfig/1/mod_jrun20.so. Your Apache service account
    should have read, write, and execute permissions on the
    /opt/jrun/lib/wsconfig/1 directory.
    The JRun module configuration is normally appended to your
    current httpd.conf file by wsconfig. Here's a sample configuration:
    LoadModule jrun_module
    "/opt/jrun/lib/wsconfig/1/mod_jrun20.so"
    <IfModule mod_jrun20.c>
    JRunConfig Verbose false
    JRunConfig Apialloc false
    JRunConfig Ssl false
    JRunConfig Ignoresuffixmap false
    JRunConfig Serverstore
    "/opt/jrun/lib/wsconfig/1/jrunserver.store"
    JRunConfig Bootstrap 10.1.0.70:51000
    #JRunConfig Errorurl <optionally redirect to this URL on
    errors>
    #JRunConfig ProxyRetryInterval 600
    #JRunConfig ConnectTimeout 30
    #JRunConfig RecvTimeout 30
    #JRunConfig SendTimeout 30
    AddHandler jrun-handler .jsp .jws .cfm .cfml .cfc .cfr
    .cfswf
    </IfModule>
    You may also want to update your DirectoryIndex directive
    with an appropriate index page, e.g. index.cfm.
    After the first request to a page handled by the JRun module
    is received, the module will query the boostrap server,
    10.1.0.70:51000, for a list of cluster peers. If you've configured
    your cluster correctly, a line similar to following will be written
    to /opt/jrun/lib/wsconfig/1/jrunserver.store:
    proxyservers=10.1.0.70:51000;10.1.0.71:51000
    You can create/edit this file manually as well.
    Unfortunately, the bootstrap option only accepts one server. If
    your bootstrap server is down, the JRun module will use the values
    in jrunserver.store directly, if the file exists.
    Here's a complete list of JRun module options:
    metrics *
    debugger *
    ssl *
    verbose
    traceflags
    serverstore
    bootstrap
    errorurl
    apialloc
    ignoresuffixmap
    proxyretryinterval
    connecttimeout
    recvtimeout
    sendtimeout
    sslcalist
    Options flagged with an asterisk can only be configured at
    the Apache server level. All other options can be configured at the
    server level and/or the virtual host level. The usage of these
    options is in the JRun documentation, and the JRun module source
    code is included in wsconfig.jar. Keep in mind that versions of the
    JRun module shipped prior to ColdFusion 8 were coded to assign the
    connecttimeout and sendtimeout options to the socket connection
    timeout. Whichever option appeared last in your configuration ended
    up as the final value. This has been fixed in ColdFusion 8 and
    presumably the next release of the JRun updater.
    I think that's a good start. If you need more information or
    can't find what you need in the JRun or ColdFusion documentation,
    let me know.
    If you're looking for resiliency, I highly recommend
    expanding your configuration to include a second web server and a
    hardware load-balancer (preferably one that supports redudancy via
    multiple paths and devices, e.g. devices from Cisco, F5, or Foundry
    Networks). Often, however, running Apache on the ColdFusion
    server(s) provides adequate performance, and round-robin DNS
    records coupled with the ability to update DNS quickly in the event
    of a failure may be all you need for load-balancing and
    failover.

  • Recommended configuration for load balanced Portal with load balancer, multiple gateways and multiple servers.

    Does anyone have a recommended network, hardware and software configuration guide for a Portal installation running with multiple gateways load balanced (ie one URL) that talk to multiple servers?

    David,
    We've used Resonate (software) to load balance the gateways. It allows
    you to group all the gateways under 1 virtual URL and load balance the
    incoming connections over each gateway depending on the rules that you
    define in Resonate. Look in the SUN portal whitepapers there is one that
    talks about it specifically.
    As far as load balancing the calls to the portals, the gateways will
    automatically load balance across all the portals that they know about
    using a simple round-robin rotation. You may be able to use Resonate in
    front of the portals but you may need to activate persistance within
    Resonate to ensure that the user always ends up on the portal that he
    established his initial connection on (if you want that), check with Sun
    on this one.
    David Broeren wrote:
    Recommended configuration for load balanced Portal with load balancer,
    multiple gateways and multiple servers.
    Does anyone have a recommended network, hardware and software
    configuration guide for a Portal installation running with multiple
    gateways load balanced (ie one URL) that talk to multiple servers?
    Try our New Web Based Forum at http://softwareforum.sun.com
    Includes Access to our Product Knowledge Base!

  • Query - Business Objects- CMS Cluster internals for load balancing/ sharing

    Hi,
    We are implementing CMS Cluster solution between two BOE server on Windows 2003 OS. As per documentation, One CMS server is primary, which coordinates with secory CMS server within same cluster. Does both server share equal load without external load balancer, by BOE cluster functionality? What are the tuning parameters for Load balancing between 2 CMS servers?
    Thanks for your help!!
    Regards,
    G

    If you somehow needed to accomplish load balancing between the 2 machines which wasn't 50/50 you could possibly try dns aliasing and have more copies of one machine than the other.  I'm not recommending this, just thinking out loud here.

  • How to setup Adobe Media Server Professional x 2 run as cluster for load balance?

    How to setup Adobe Media Server Professional x 2 run as cluster for load balance?

    Hi,
    Welcome to adobe forums,
    Please refer to these help files in order to setup AMS as a cluster : https://helpx.adobe.com/adobe-media-server/config-admin/load-balancing.html
                                                                                                                https://helpx.adobe.com/adobe-media-server/tech-overview/scaling-server.html
    Let me know if you need any help.
    Regards,
    Puspendra

  • Round robin DNS for load balancing between multiple network adapters (Xserve)

    I'm attempting to use 'round robin' DNS to load balance between the two ethernet adapters of an Xserve.
    Both ethernet adapters are connected to the same LAN and have static IP addresses of 192.168.2.250 and 192.168.2.251.
    The DNS zone for the server's local domain/host (macserver.private) has a machine record with both IP addresses (set up in the Lion Server UI).
    Having read up on round robin DNS, I would have expected DNS requests for 'macserver.private' to be answered with the two IP addresses ordered at random, achiving my aim of requests being served at random via each ethernet adapter.
    However this doesn't seem to be the case. Doing a 'nslookup' from any of the network clients results in the two IP addresses being listed in the same order everytime. And pinging 'macserver.private' only ever results in a response from the same address.
    Does anyone know why this is the case? Does Lion Server use a non-standard DNS configuration? Are there any additional settings I need to configure in Lion's DNS server to make adopt a round robin approach to responding to requests?
    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Be careful what you wish for
    Round Robin DNS is rarely the best option for 'load balancing'. At the very least it's subject to caching at various point on the network - even at the client side, once the client looks up the address it will cache that response - this means that subsequent lookups may be served from the client's cache and not refer back to the server. Therfore any given client will always see the same address until the cache expires.
    I suspect this is what you're seeing.
    You can minimize this by setting a lower TTL on the records. This should result in the response being cached for a shorter period, meaning the client will make more requests to the server, with a higher change of using the 'other' address.
    However, you're also going to run into issues with the server having two interfaces/addresses in the same LAN. This isn't recommended.
    As Jonathon mentioned, you may be better off just bonding the two interfaces. This will provide an automatic level of dynamic load balancing without the latency of DNS caches, as well as automatic failover should one link fail (as opposed to round robin DNS which will cause 50% of requests to fail until the client cache expires and a new lookup is performed (and, even then, there's still a chance the client will try to use the failed link).

  • Some confusion about Web Cache clustering for load balancing

    I have 4 Windows 2003 identical machines having OAS 10g installed with Web Cache (Same Passwords and Oracle Home) . I want to utilize them for load-balancing using Microsoft Network Load-balancing. I followed the Note: 259208.1 till step#10. Now we have virtual machine "IASPROD" for all other nodes {IASPROD1,IASPROD2,IASPROD3,IASPROD4 } I am able to logon to Web Cache manager from all nodes separately.
    On Node-1 I added all nodes entries in " Origin Server " having routed "Enabled " for all of them. Same I did added in Site-Definitions and gave alias hostname as "IASPROD" which is virtual server.
    Priority =1
    Site Hostname =iasprod1.domain Port = 80
    Policy = Unrestricted
    Origin Server Hostnames , port,proxy
    iasprod1.domain 7778 No
    iasprod2.domain 7778 No
    iasprod3.domain 7778 No
    iasprod4.domain 7778 No
    I have couple of questions might be very basic but as I am configuring very first time.
    1. How do I access all the machines through virtual name as stated above ? I tried but not working.
    2. This cluster setup should be repeated for all Nodes or for only node-1.
    3. If for only Node-1 than what will heppen in case of Node-1 goes down.
    4. How can I verify Load-balancing is working ?
    If you guyz can guide me than I'll be very greatful.

    One more addition Database is on AIX (9.2.0.4)

  • Mod_oc4j for load-balancing

    Guys,
    Looking for some feedback on DMSMetricCollector when using "metric" as the selectmethod for load-balancing. What i want to know is that whether the DMSMetricCollector can be configured to use multiple metrics such jvm-heapsiize, servlet-processRequestTime etc, Connection-pools FreePoolSize.value etc ? the documentation doesn't explicitly mention that if its possible, apparently it doesn't but want to check from the experts here, Steve you might have something on this...
    Or if there is any other implementation available which supports load-balancing based on multiple performance metrics
    Thanks and Regards

    can i use this loadbalancer.jar or not?
    how to mod_oc4j in standalone app server

  • Windows Event Collector - Built-in options for load balancing and high availability ?

    Hello,
    I have a working collector. config is source initiated, and pushed by GPO.
    I would like to deploy a second collector for high availability and load balancing. What are the available options ? I have not found any guidance on TechNet articles.
    As a low cost option, is it fine to simply start using DNS round-robin with a common alias for both servers pushed as a collector name through GPO ?
    In my GPO Policy, if I individually declare both servers, events are forwarded twice, once for each server. Indeed it does cover high availability, but not really optimized.
    Thanks for your help.

    Hi,
    >>As a low cost option, is it fine to simply start using DNS round-robin with a common alias for both servers pushed as a collector name through GPO ?
    Based on the description, we can utilize DNS round robin to distribute workloads and increase fault tolerance. By default, DNS uses round robin to rotate the order of RR data returned in query answers where multiple RRs of the same type exist for a queried
    DNS domain name. This feature provides a simple method for load balancing client use of Web servers and other frequently queried multihomed computers. Besides, by default, DNS will perform round-robin rotation for all RR types.
    Regarding DNS round robin, the following article can be referred to for more information.
    Configuring round robin
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc787484(v=ws.10).aspx
    TechNet Subscriber Support
    If you are TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback here.
    Best regards,
    Frank Shen

  • Clustering for load balancing only

    I wish to set up 2 WLS 8.1 machines to run an application independently to
              share load (no replication of sessions, beans etc).
              Can I create a cluster for the two servers and not turn on any session or
              bean replication, then configure the IIS or Apache plug-in to use the
              cluster and therefore create some load balancing?
              Chris
              

    Chris,
              Yes you can certainly use a Cluster simply for load balancing. There is no
              mandate that you have to take advantage of session state replication in the
              cluster.
              ~Ryan Upton
              "Chris Steains" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:[email protected]..
              > I wish to set up 2 WLS 8.1 machines to run an application independently to
              > share load (no replication of sessions, beans etc).
              >
              > Can I create a cluster for the two servers and not turn on any session or
              > bean replication, then configure the IIS or Apache plug-in to use the
              > cluster and therefore create some load balancing?
              >
              >
              > Chris
              >
              >
              

  • Best practice for load balancing on SA540

    Are there some 'best practice' guide to configure out load balancing on SA540 .?
    I've got 2 ADSL lines and would like device to auto manage outgoing traffic .. Any idea ?
    Regards

    Hi,
    SA500 today implements flow based round robin load balancing scheme.
    In the case of two WAN link (over ADSL), by default, the traffic should be "roughly" equally distributed.
    So in general, users should have no need to configure anything further for load balancing.
    The SA500 also supports protocol binding (~PBR) over WAN links. This mechanism offers more control on how traffic can flow.
    For example, if you have 1 ADSL with higher throughput than the other ADSL link offers, you can consider to bind bandwidth-hungry app on the WAN link connecting to the higher ADSL link and the less bandwidth-hungary app on the other one. The other traffic can continue to do round robin.  This way you won't saturate the low bandwidth link and give users better application experiences.
    Regards,
    Richard

  • Multiple dgraph clustering (load balancing) OOTB available?

    Hello,
    We have 2 dgraphs running in parallel having the same data to share the load of the clients.
    I would like to know if there is any OOTB solution provided by Endeca where in these two dgraphs can share the load. OR I need to use an external load balancer for the same?
    If there is any document that explains the configuration for OOTB Endeca solution, please let me know
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    yes I know...
    i tried to check if they were still available...but found none,
    that's why I said if you want me to send them email me ...(I downloaded them from Eden ) and the files aren't too big
    regards
    Saleh
    29/11/12 : copy of the document called Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server (Endeca)
    Endeca Solution Article Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
    Endeca Solution Article
    Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
    By Robert Dennis
    Last Updated: December 2010
    Endeca Product Versions: 5.0+
    This document describes how to set up a simple load balancing and failover solution using Apache HTTP server. This provides a cost effective mechanism leveraging widely available open source technologies to address simple infrastructure needs. This document includes the following sections:
     Introduction
     Configuration Steps
     References
    Endeca Solution Article Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
    Endeca Confidential 2 of 5
    Introduction
    Load balancers are the preferred solution for providing scalability, redundancy, and fail-over for MDEX Engine queries. Typically, load balancing and failover are accomplished with the use of dedicated load balancing hardware. For some Endeca implementations, however, a robust mechanism for load balancing may not be available or required by the customer. For more information on the basics of load balancing an Endeca application, see the “Endeca Load Balancing Best Practices” Solution Article available on EDeN.
    This document describes the configuration steps involved in leveraging Apache’s default load balancing mechanisms to provide a simple load balancing solution for an Endeca application. In this scenario, Apache will sit between the Endeca presentation API housed in a web application and redundant MDEX engines. Apache performs the duties of a simple load balancer and failover broker, managing query requests from the application tier to specific MDEX engines.
    Configuration Steps
    The described configuration leverages Apache 2.2 HTTP Server as the load balancing mechanism between two identical MDEX engines all residing on a single server. The sample configuration expects the Apache HTTP server to be listening on port 5555 and the MDEX engines to be listening on ports 8000 and 8001. These can be changed as appropriate for a given environment.
    1. In the Apache httpd.conf, enable the server for listening on port 5555.
    Endeca Solution Article Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
    Endeca Confidential 3 of 5
    2. Enable the following modules by un-commenting the appropriate loadmodule statements in the httpd.conf file. These modules include: mod_proxy, mod_proxy_balancer, mod_proxy_connect, mod_proxy_http, mod_negotiation.
    3. Include the httpd-vhosts.conf file by un-commenting the appropriate line in the httpd.conf file.
    4. Save the httpd.conf file and open the httpd-vhosts.conf file. Append the below information and save the file.
    Endeca Solution Article Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
    Endeca Confidential 4 of 5
    NameVirtualHost *:5555 <VirtualHost *:5555> ServerName localhost ProxyPass / balancer://dgraphs/ ProxyPassReverse / balancer://dgraphs/ <Proxy balancer://dgraphs> BalancerMember http://localhost:8000 loadfactor=1 retry=0 BalancerMember http://localhost:8001 loadfactor=1 retry=0 </Proxy> </VirtualHost> <Location /balancer-manager> SetHandler balancer-manager </Location>
    The “retry” parameter associated with Balance Members disables the period of inactivity for a particular worker after Apache determines it is offline. The default is 60 seconds. It is recommended that this is set to a low number such as 0.
    In environments where particular MDEX engines are targeted for additional load, the “loadfactor” parameter associated with Balance Members can be adjusted. Higher values ensure that the load balancing algorithm that is used will route the traffic load accordingly to specific Balance Members.
    5. Restart Apache.
    6. Within the UI application, configure the host and port of the HttpENEConnection to the host and port of the load balancer (e.g. localhost:5555).
    Endeca Solution Article Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
    Endeca Confidential 5 of 5
    Apache HTTP Server is now properly configured to serve as a load balancer for the MDEX Engines.
    References
    “Endeca Load Balancing Best Practices” Solution Article (EDeN)
    Apache Module mod_proxy
    Apache Module mod_proxy_balancer
    Apache Module mod_proxy_connect
    Apache Module mod_proxy_http
    Apache Module mod_negotiation
    Edited by: sabdelhalim on Nov 28, 2012 5:46 PM

  • New CAS for Load Balancing Exchange 2007

    I want to add a new CAS to an existing Exchange 2007 environment (there is already one CAS and it functions properly) to allow for load balancing. After adding the new server I wanted to do some testing (before I actually set it up for load balancing).
    If I try to log in to a mailbox using OWA I get an error stating that "Exception type: Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Storage.ConnectionFailedTransient ExceptionException message: Cannot open mailbox". I am sure I am missing something simple, but cannot
    figure it out. Could someone point me in the right direction?

    Is your new CAS in the same Windows site as the rest of your Exchange servers?  In Exchange 2007 and 2010, the CAS needs to be in the same Windows site as the mailbox it is servicing (unless you are accessing from the Internet and the other site has
    no externally accessible CAS).

Maybe you are looking for