CO-PA FB60 vs MIRO

Hi guys, we are posting third party invoices through FB60 and MIRO. We need to make sure cost should flow to CO-PA. Can some one explain advantages and disadvantages using FB60 or MIRO. Is there white paper or documentation I can go and study so that we can submit our recommendations to customer. Please help.

HI
Double invoice check for a vendor is possible for:
1. Company Code
2. Invoice Date
3. Referece document
If in config all of these are selected, and if you enter 2 invoices with all same values for above parameters, then system will throw an error.
Amount is not checked for this and can you verify may be Reference given differently
Thanks
Vishnu

Similar Messages

Reporting country on FB60 and MIRO for EU countries

Hi,
I am trying to post an Incoming Invoice using FB60 or MIRO.
Since the company code is defined as a EU country(Netherlands), the Reporting country and VAT registration number fields apear on the 'DETAILS' Tab on both MIRO and FB60.
Once reporting country is entered, the VAT number gets selected from the Vendor Master.
I have the following questions for which I need help:
1. Is there a way to configure MIRO and FB60 so that the 'reporting country' is automatically selected and defaulted once I enter the Vendor Number? (similar to how the Payment terms gets defaulted from Vendor master).
Currently, I have to enter the reporting country each time I enter an Invoice.
2.If the Invoice is saved without entering the 'Reporting country', if I try to change the Invoice document, this field is not available for edit and so I cannot fill the Rptg country later. (The field appears in Document Header).
Is there a way to handle this in FB60 and MIRO configuration so that the field 'reporting country' is available for change when we change document using Fb02? is there a seperate setting for this?
Thanks,
Uma Toraskar

Hi Uma,
did you find some solutions for your questions?
Greetings, Vanessa

FB60 / MIGO / MIRO

What is the main purpose of each of these transactions as it relates to AP? What are the primary differences between these transactions?

hi Hari
Good question
first os all understand the process of Account payable
there are two scenario
Local purchase
Import purchase
when u purchase a material from vendor, there are flow how to receive material and post the invocie
in local case- u create Purchase requisation - PO -
then u receive a material u capture Excise
J1IEX - Capture excise
then u post good receipt Through MIGO Transaction
MIGO Means - Good receipt whichever u receipt
here fi entry genrated
Stock a./c dr
GR/IR A/c
then u post the excise through J1IEX
then u post vendor invocie through MIRO T.Code
here fi entry
Vendor Cr
GR/IR Dr
Excise Dr
cess on excise Dr
Secess Dr
u use FB60 and MIRO for Vendor invoice
then u make a payment through
F-53 - Mannual
F110 -- Automatic
If any query revert back
Regards
Roobal

FB60 vs MIRO

Hi All
I am using "Instruction Keys" for entering some data for the bank. When posting via FB60 there is no problem - these fields are nicely on "Payment" tab. When using MIRO I can't see them!!!! I do not understand it - the field status is the same, the posting key is the same.... I do not know any other parameters resonsible for those instruction keys field(s).
Anyone will help please!!!!
Regards
R.

Hello Robert
As per my information unfortunately, MIRO does not support these fields DTWS1-DTWS4.
This functionality is not implemented for MM invoice verification and therefore the screens of the MM invoice verification do not contain these fields.
Regards
Javier Reviriego

T-code:FB60 and MIRO business place validation Section Code mandatory

Hi,
My requirement is to make mandatory in MIRO and FB60 field: BUPLA-business place and field:SECCO-Section Code.
I have done validation through GGB0 . i am facing problem
prerequisite: syst-tcode = 'FB60'
check bseg-bupla   <>   ' ' and bseg-secco <> ' '
message 'Enter business place and business section.
This is working fine when bseg-bupla and bseg-secco is not entered .
but when user enter value in both fields bseg-bupla and bseg-secco .
in table bseg-bupla and bseg-secco both become blank.
Is ther any other method to achieve this
regads,
K.Shobha.

Hi
Have you tried it with customizing tools? I understand that you can achieve it. I think that you want to populate these fields if you have a field status group for this account (check it in FS00). You can create a field status group for this account and do mandatory this fields. If you have doubts, search the help of a FI consultant.
If you see the help for this field:
Field status group
    Determines the screen layout for document entry.
    Fields can have the following statuses:
    o   Optional entry - you can enter data in the field
    o   Mandatory entry - you must enter data in the field
    o   Suppressed - the field does not appear on the screen
You can mantain it with tcode OBC4.
I hope this helps you.
Regards
Eduardo

Document clearing required in vendor invoice in FB60 and MIRO

Hello Experts,
I am posting one vendor invoice. I want to distribute one vendor invoice between two profit centers. Now SAP is posting following entries:
Expense A/c... Dr (Cost Center: 100001 / Profit Center: 1000) - Rs.5000
Tax Receivable A/c... Dr (Profit Center: 1100) - Rs.400 (Default profit center for this GL is pulled from FAGL3KEH)
    To Vendor A/c (Profit Center 1000) - Rs.5000
    To Vendor A/c (Profit Center 1100) - Rs.400
In above entry, vendor line item is getting divided into two profit center. But my requirement is that, system should not vendor line item in two. It should post using document balance clearing A/c. Desired entry is:
Expense A/c... Dr (Cost Center: 100001 / Profit Center: 1000) - Rs.5000
Tax Receivable A/c... Dr (Profit Center: 1100) - Rs.400 (Default profit center for this GL is pulled from FAGL3KEH)
Document Splitting clearing A/c... Dr (Profit Center 1000) - Rs.400
    To Vendor A/c (Profit Center 1000) - Rs.5400
    To Document Splitting clearing A/c (Profit Center 1100) - Rs.400
Please help me in achieving the above set of entries. Following and attached are the settings done for document splitting:
1. Vendor GL account is marked as 03000 (Vendor) without overridden tick.
2. Tax GL account is marked as 05100 (Tax on Sales / Purchase) without overridden tick.
3. Expense GL account is marked as 20000 (Expense) without over ridden tick.
Please look into it and provide with your inputs

Hi Deepak,
check document splitting for gl a/c give vendor recon a/c gl and give item category as vendor.
also check doucment type which you are using it should be vendor only.
when ever you use document splitting don't use standard one copy it do the modifications.
Regards,
Raman

Vendor Name not defaulted in FB60 & MIRO

Dear Experts,
When I enter vendor code in invoice posint T codes FB60 or MIRO, vendor details (name, address) is not shown. I have to explicitely click on the DISPLAY VENDOR button to see the vendor details.
Can anyone help me with this problem?
Thanks
Amarendra

Dear Alex,
Thanks for quick reply. Can you give me more details about upgrading the GUI? Do i need to get it done from Basis?
Thanks
Amarendra

Invoice receipt date in FB60 & MIRO

In FB60 & MIRO, invoice date and posting date are showing up in the basic tab. In addition to invoice date, would like to see invoice receipt date. What needs to be done so that this shows up in FB60 and MIRO for data entry?

Hi
You need to capture it in Header text or Reference field
there is no separate field for it
Regards
Ajay M

Display Payment Terms in MIRO and FB60

FI Gurus,
How can I restrict A/P clerks to only view payment terms when entering an invoice thru FB60 or MIRO.
Thank You for your help,

HI,
You can build a transaction and screen variant using SHD0 and assign it to a user.
Refer to the link below for more info:
[Transaction Variant|http://www.mortenhjorthnielsen.dk/Security/transactionvariants.htm]
Cheers.

PDF Attachment while posting thru MIRO / FB60

Dear Friends,
I need your help on the following scenario.
Requirement:
we are going to build an interface for invioce postings in SAP using Tcode FB60(Invioce with out PO) and MIRO(with PO).
Data has to be picked up by the interface from a staging server where each invoice data is available in .dat format.
Data for posting is from the .dat file. We are going to store that in Z tables and will use for posting.
But our additional requirement is each invoice will have a PDF document(supporting document for that invoice), it is not the invoice as such, but an additional document.
While doing the posting in SAP thru FB60/MIRO transaction, the PDF file corresponding to this invoice has to be attached with this posting.
Problem Areas:
We know that an attachment can be uploaded thru transaction in FB03 after the posting is done using Object Services.
1. But our concern is how can they be attached programatically?
2. Can't we attach the file while doing Posting either thru FB60 or MIRO?
3. How to extract those PDF files placed in another server and attach during the background job?
Any help/inputs on this is highly appreciated.
SAP Version: 4.7 Enterprise edition
Note: Content of the PDF attachment is not the data for invoice posting, no need to read its contents, it only has to be attached with the posting.
Regards,
Simha

Change in requirement..
Hence i am closing this thread.
Regards,
Simha

FB60/MIRO company code popup

Hi,
I have a workflow workitem which tries to call transactions FB60 and MIRO depending on whether the invoice is based on a non-PO or not. When the transaction is called, the company code screen pops up; I managed to suppress this for MIRO by explicitly specifying company code value in screen 1000 for FM DOCHEADER_COMP_CODE_WITH_POPUP - basically I did a BDC. But the same thing for some reason does not work for FB60. Does anybody have any idea why this happens or any other way in which I can suppress the company code popup?
Thanks in advance.
Nanditha

Hi Nanditha,
Have had the same problem with FB50 from workflow, and had to solve it by doing as below. The problem appears when using 'enjoy' transactions.
The code to solve ít look like this:
SET PARAMETER ID 'BUK' FIELD E_BKPF-BUKRS.
    PERFORM bdc_dynpro       using 'SAPLACHD' '1000'.
    PERFORM bdc_field        using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                   '=ENTR'.
    PERFORM bdc_field        using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                                   'BKPF-BUKRS'.
    PERFORM bdc_field        using 'BKPF-BUKRS'
                                    e_bkpf-bukrs.
Hope this will help you too!
Regards Benita Östman

PAN Number Display in MIRO/FB60

Hi Expert
My Client wants PAN Number to be appear at the time of FB60 and MIRO transaction, Please guide how it can be done ?
Regards,
GK

Dear Kumar,
To bring PAN no. while doing miro or fb60 ABAPer can do with program modification,
I have done for my client one procedure with out changing any program, take the dump of vendor master where they are maintained PAN no. list out which vendor not having the PAN no. block those vendors, when users going to raise any transaction with those vendor it will give the error message then users will communicate with the vendors to get the PAN no. once update release those vendor codes.
If your comfortable with this solution implement -
Regards
Chandu

Reference filed length in MIRO and FB60 should be increased.

Hi ,
I have a problem with the reference filed in the transaction MIRO and FB60, needs to increase the field length from 16 to 19.
Is it possible ? if so how we can we do that?
We have got one idea to use existing Header text field for the reference field, then how to map the Header text field to reference field in the General Ledger?
can you pls look into this and do the the needfull.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Phani.

Hi,
I think you can change field length for reference field. Goto domain XBLNR1 and change the length of the field.
Or
There is another common field (assignment field) in both the transactions FB60 and MIRO.
This is field also additional information field for item. this field length is 18. You can use this field instead of changing length of reference field.
You can see this field in FBL1N also.
Regards,
Chandra

Validations for FB70, FB75 and FB60, MIRO without Tax Codes

Hi,
can u help on the below issue.
I want to restrict the users while posting(FB70, FB75 and FB60, MIRO) without tax codes, please provide Validations for the same.
Block AR/AP for postings without tax code - AR is FB70 and FB75 - AP is FB 60 and MIRO
Thanks&regards,
Rajesh

Hi,
Please check below validations for FB60 AND MIRO ,FB70 AND FB75
Prerequisite
BKPF-BUKRS = 'xxxx' AND SYST-TCODE = 'FB60'
OR SYST-TCODE = 'FB75' OR SYST-TCODE = 'FB70'
OR SYST-TCODE = 'MIRO'
Check
BSEG-MWSKZ
Please check ,
NARESH

Screen Layout with MIRO, FB50, FB60, FB65, FB70, FB75 ETC.

Hi,
Can anybody let me know how the screen layout of TCode= MIRO, FB50, FB60, FB70, FB65, FB75 etc. is changed?
I want to add the column "COMMITMENT ITEM" during posting with the above Transaction Code.
Please help.
Regards
Rahkes

Hi Amanullah,
Thanks for your response.
For Commitment Item - I have created one DUMMY Commitment Item with Financial Transaction = 50 (Clearing). (TCode-FMCIA)
I like to assign this DUMMY Commitment Item where I don't require the Fund Management Activities like Budget. I am doing this b'cos commitment item is mandagory in Fund Management.
I have assigned Commitment Item = DUMMY to all remaining GL Account in FS00.
When I am posting transaction with FB01 then it has no problem b'cos the field Commitment Item is visible and optional and "DUMMY" is automatically assign to the commitment item. But in case of FB50, FB60, FB70, MIRO etc where the Commitment Item field is not visible I am getting the error "No Commitment Item entered".
To avoid this error, to me there are two options
1. I can assign the "DUMMY" commitment item to each GL Account under FMDERIVE
2. To assign to "DUMMY" commitment item to each GL Account in FS00 and make the commitment item visible and optional in all T-Code like FB50, FB60, FB70, MIRO etc. But in this case I am not able to make the commitment item visible and optional during posting of the transactions.
Could you please help with your expereise?
Which option is more logical in this case?
Regards
Rahkes

CO-PA FB60 vs MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for