Color Settings issues in Lightroom.

I'm new to Lightroom, and I have been using it for sometime with no issues, until recently. 
I normally shoot with a Nikon D800, and haven't had any issues with it, importing, and reading colors.  Recently I rented a Fujix100 for a job, and used lightroom as well to process all those images, but I feel like it may have changed a preference setting in lightroom because now when I import from my Nikon, where there should be a subtle gradation, I get magenta banding.
Strange thing is, this only happens in the Lightroom workspace.  When I export the image, I don't see the banding, and even on a friends monitor, they don't notice the banding.
Im getting my Nikon checked out as we speak to make sure its not my sensor, but my question is, is there anyway to reset the color settings on Lightroom just to be on default?
And is that information then attached to my different catalogs, or just the application?
Thanks.
-J.
Edit-  I should also add taht I had to replace the monitor on my computer be cause of yellowing, so I know that my monitor is new (unless they replaced it with a faulty monitor, but then I would see banding everywhere.)

I think the problem is with the new monitor, not with the cameras.  Shooting with a different brand or model shouldn't have any impact on another model.  If you are talking about resetting default cameras settings, yes you can do that.  But using the Fuji should not have impacted the Nikon at all.  You either need to calibrate that new monitor, or exchange it for another if you have that option.

Similar Messages

  • Color Settings issue in Photoshop CS6

    We are currently using G7 Workflow for our profile. I have a couple of questions concerning the color settings.
    1.We are also not able to hold these settings even once we leave it as "Custom". It defaults back to U.S. Sheetfed Coated Profile.
    2. When trying to set color setting with our profile, it says it is not supported by this version of Photoshop (CS6). It will set this to "Custom" instead of G7 Workflow. What can we do to fix this issue? Please see below for the screen captures.
    Please help! Thanks in advance!

    Where did you get that color settings file?  How was it created?

  • Color  settings issue

    I am using CS3 under Vista Ultimate.
    I'd be grateful for help with a couple of problems:
    1. When I customise my color settings the customisarion is not sticking - that is, when I save the customisation, close the settings box and reopen it - the settings have returned to North America General Purpose 2. Similarly, if I load a customised setting it has always reverted to North American General Purpose 2 when I next look at the color settings.
    2. For reasons I don't understand, recent photos have started to look over saturated with a blue shift when I Save (them) For The Web. My work is all for the internet and my workflow is all sRGB. That's why I am surprised by the colour problem. It's definitely something to do with the colour profile of the photo I am working on - when I take photos I have worked on a few weeks ago there is no colour shift when I Save for Web. I have converted the problem photo to sRGB but that has not solved the problem. I know I'm doing something dumb but I can't work out what it is or how to rescue the photo I have been working on.
    Thanks for any help.
    David

    I spoke too soon.
    The impermanent color settings have returned.
    The reinstall did not solve the problem. Whenever I open the Colour Settings box the settings are all back to the North America General Purpose 2 profile.
    I have contacted Adobe tech support who replied that it was not a technical problem but a usage problem (pilot error). At my request they had another look at the issue and have replied:
    "Try to resett the preferences as you can see in the following doc.
    http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb400950
    if preferences did not solver your issue, create a new admin account and try to recreate the problem in the new admin account."
    I have tried resetting the preferences a number of times and that did not work. I will create a new admin account as suggested but I am not hopeful that this will solve the problem.

  • Can one set up Lightroom to allow use of manufacturer's printer profiles and Advanced Color Settings

    I like the effects that I can apply to my B&W images using Advanced Color Settings, but understand that I get best print quality using the manufacturer's paper profiles. However, I get locked out of Advanced Color Settings unless I choose "Managed by Printer". Can I do both - select a specific paper profile and use Advanced Color Settings? Thanks

    I don't know what printer you are using. But if you want to use all of the controls in the Lightroom print module you need to let Lightroom manage the color. For my printer, this requires making that choice in Lightroom and then disabling color management in the printer driver. Then, using Lightroom, I am able to use all of those settings and choose the appropriate profile provided by the paper manufacturer.
    With my printer, if I choose to let the printer manage the color, I can make all of those choices in the printer driver. But you cannot split your management between Lightroom and your printer.  You have to go one way or the other.

  • Color Management Issues Solved in LR 1.1?

    Long tempted to switch from Elements 5.0 to LR (or to integrate the two), I have held off because I've read on this forum dozens, probably hundreds, of complaints about LR 1.0 and color management. Some of these questions were clearly from ignorance, I know (such as not understanding the difference between the color space used by monitors and that used by printers). But many other were from sophisticated users all of whom began their comments or questions with "Works perfectly in Photoshop, but in LR ..." See, for example, http://adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bc41850/39 , which describes difficulty in getting LR to produce acceptable prints. To my mind, LR 1.0 had color management problems even if the highest end users managed to work around them. I don't want to buy into problems, not being a sophisticated user yet myself. So here is my queston: Does LR 1.1 solve these problems? That is, does LR 1.1 work as easily, or almost as easily, as Photoshop (say with the HP b9180, which has a PS plugin)? Thanks in advance.

    The problem is that lightroom is somehow throwing the default profile that is set in colorsync into the mix. Which is something that Photoshop is not doing. So any printer profiles built by printing a target with PS is not going to be accurate when printed through Lightroom unless the default profile for you printer is Generic RGB Profile or something close.
    Here is what I have posted elsewhere about my discovery of this issue.
    I discovered something today that just might be the answer to the color printing problems from Lightroom.
    First of all, all prints from PS and Lightroom was done with the same color management workflow with the profiles set in the application and color management turned off in the printer driver. This was to a Canon iPF9000.
    Started when I tried to print from a new MacPro with Lightroom. Colors were not right.
    Went to the G5 and printed from lightroom same file same settings same profile, color was correct.
    Printed same file same setting same profile from PS on the MacPro. Color was correct.
    So started printing and saving as PDF from the print dialog. Open the PDF files in Acrobat and checking embedded profile with Pitstop.
    Here are the results.
    Lightroom on Macpro: iPF9000 Paper profile. This was much darker with way to much yellow.
    Photoshop of Macpro: Generic RGB
    Lightroom on G5: sRGB v1.20 (Canon)
    I had uninstall the sRGB v1.20 (Canon) profile from the colorsync folder on the MacPro. Added sRGB v1.20 (Canon) back in and guess what. sRGB v1.20 (Canon) in the PDF now generated from Lightroom. Print to the printer from Lightroom on the MacPro and it now printed correct.
    Now got to thinking were does Lightroom get this (sRGB v1.20 (Canon) profile from. So checked in the Colorsync utility to see what the default profile for the iPF9000 is and sure enough it was sRGB v1.20 (Canon). Ok so what happens if I change the default profile in the Colorsync utility to Adobe RGB. Now guess what the Lightroom generated PDF now shows Adobe RGB as the embedded profile.
    PS printed to PDF showed Generic RGB profile no matter what I set as the default profile in the Colorsync Utility.
    Clearly Lightroom behaves differently when printing when a different default profile is selected for a printer. On Windows this could be the same as one can set in the printer properties (at least for the iPF9000) the default profile to automatic or set a different default profile manually.
    This raises an interesting question as to what is really going on with print files set to a printer. Especially printers with much larger gamuts than sRGB.
    Could this be the source of the strange Lightroom printing problems?
    I do know when I have tried to make a profile from a printed target in LR I could not get accurate color. But the profile generated for a target printed in PS works fine in LR.

  • Photoshop not seeing export color space setting in Lightroom 4

    MY LR or PS programs are not acting as expected.
    When my Lightroom 4 is set to export to Photoshop in either the sRGB color space or the AdobeRGB color space, and Photoshop is set for the sRGB space, Photoshop gives a color mismatch error in both cases, saying the image is an AdobeRGB embedded image.  However, if the color space in PS is set for AdobeRGB, even if the export setting in Lightroom is sRGB, there is no mismatch error. 
    Apparently, PS sees every image as embedded with AdobeRGB.
    I have a Sony NEX6 camera.  I have taken pictures in the camera sRGB color space and the AdobeRGB space, which I used for this test. Since I shoot in RAW, this should not matter, so I don’t think it is the issue, and, in fact, I get the same result no matter which color space the camera is in.
    If LR export and PS color space are the same, why should there be a mismatch, and why is PS not seeing the sRGB space?  Might there be a setting in Lightroom or Photoshop that I am missing?

    howdego wrote:
    I am, however, trying to decide on the right color space to use, which is how I noticed this problem. I rarely make prints of my photos.  I make bluray movies using Proshow Producer.  I recently got a new monitor and Samsung LED HDTV, and found that my photo videos did not display right and I am trying to find out why.  I found the normal viewing settings of the TV have too much color and sharpness, so I established another group of settings for photos, which helped.  However, I am still not satisfied.
    These are two separate but related issues.
    1) It's almost impossible to get accurate Color and Luminance level rendering inside LR if you don't use a hardware monitor calibrator to adjust your computer monitor.
    2) LCD TV's use settings to "enhance" color, brightness, and contrast that is usually very, very inacuuarte. But this is what most non-photography people seem to like so TV manufacturers crank up the "default settings." I also have an older 52" Samsung TV (LN-T5265F) that I've manually adjusted for more accurate color. Try using the 'Movie' mode, which is the most accurate mode and turn the Backlight setting down. Here are the settings I use with my Samsung TV. I assume your Samsung TV's controls are similar:
    Setup Screens
    HDMI 1 (Cable Box) & Coax (Cable)
    HDMI 2 (Panasonic Blu-Ray Player)
    PICTURE - 1
    Movie
    Standard
    Dynamic
    Movie
    Standard
    Dynamic
    Contrast
    82
    82
    82
    82
    82
    82
    Brightness
    43
    45
    45
    43
    45
    45
    Sharpness
    25
    25
    35
    15
    15
    25
    Color
    42
    45
    45
    44
    45
    45
    Tint
    77 R
    77 R
    84 R
    77 R
    77 R
    84 R
    Backlight
    5
    6
    7
    5
    5
    6
    PICTURE - 2
    Color Tone
    Normal
    Normal
    Normal
    Normal
    Normal
    Normal
    Detailed Settings
    Black Adjust
    Off
    NA
    NA
    Off
    NA
    NA
    Dynamic Contrast
    Low
    NA
    NA
    Low
    NA
    NA
    Gamma
    -1
    NA
    NA
    -1
    NA
    NA
    Color Space
    Auto
    NA
    NA
    Auto
    NA
    NA
    White Balance
    R-Offset
    13
    NA
    NA
    13
    NA
    NA
    G-Offset
    15
    NA
    NA
    15
    NA
    NA
    B-Offset
    17
    NA
    NA
    17
    NA
    NA
    R-Gain
    15
    NA
    NA
    15
    NA
    NA
    G-Gain
    12
    NA
    NA
    12
    NA
    NA
    B-Gain
    17
    NA
    NA
    17
    NA
    NA
    My Color Control
    Pink
    15
    NA
    NA
    15
    NA
    NA
    Green
    15
    NA
    NA
    15
    NA
    NA
    Blue
    15
    NA
    NA
    15
    NA
    NA
    White
    15
    NA
    NA
    15
    NA
    NA
    Edge Ehnacement
    On
    NA
    NA
    On
    NA
    NA
    xvYCC
    Off
    NA
    NA
    Off
    NA
    NA
    Digital NR
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Active Color
    Off(NA)
    Off(NA)
    Off
    Off(NA)
    Off(NA)
    Off
    Dnie
    Off(NA)
    Off
    Off
    Off(NA)
    Off
    Off
    SETUP - Screen 2
    Energy Saving
    Off
    Off
    Off
    Off
    Off
    Off
    SETUP - Screen 3
    HDMI Black Level
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Film Mode
    Off(NA)
    Off(NA)
    Off(NA)
    Off(NA)
    Off(NA)
    Off(NA)
    howdego wrote:
    So it occurred to me that some colors might be wrong, or too saturated, because I am not seeing them on my monitor as they will appear on the HDTV.  I am thinking that since sRGB is my final color space, I would try to do everything in the sRGB space, including setting my monitor to sRGB (I have a Dell 2413 which supports adobeRGB too).  I was inn the process of trying this when I found the issue at hand.  Might you have any thoughts about this color space choice
    If you have a wide-gamut monitor you are better off using it in Adobe RGB mode with a monitor calibrator. But then the monitor will not look correct in non-color managed applications:
    http://www.gballard.net/photoshop/srgb_wide_gamut.html
    You can circumvent this issue by using your monitor in sRGB mode, but I'd still suggest you use a hardware monitor calibrator. Either way it is imortatnt that you have a proper monitor profile assigned in Windows or OS X Color Management. The monitor manufacturer provides these, but they don't always work well with LR for numerous reasons.
    To insure the best image quality you should do all of your editing in PS using 16 bit TIFF with ProPhoto RGB profile format until you are ready to Export. For use with ProShow you can use TIFFs or JPEGs, but use sRGB color profile to avoid any color management issue. JPEGs are fine and a LR Quality higher than 80 (10 in PS) is a waste of disk space for slideshow images.
    In short you've got a lot of "variables" between the uncalibrated monitor and out-of-the-box non-adjusted TV. The former requires a good hardware calibrator aad the latter a good "eye" to adjust it.

  • Aperture/Photoshop Color Control Issues

    I am photographer that has been doing the unthinkable for the past four years – I use the Finder to scroll through pictures I’ve taken and load them one-by-one into Photoshop CS4 for editing. I know this is dumb, and I really want to change my workflow. I’ve really like Aperture, but it has one fatal flaw (and one minor flaw) that is preventing me from using it. I desperately need help, as I estimate I need to review and edit 50,000+ images this year!
    I’ll give you as best of a description of each problem and everything I can remember that I’ve tried. Note, that these issues replicate on three different Mac (all also clean installs), Mac OS 10.5 and 10.6, a PC, and the issue is the same with Lightroom 2 and 3 Beta, as well as Aperture 2 and 3. I must be doing something really dumb!
    The Major Problem:
    So I start off with a picture like this in Aperture (it may be useful to open images in multiple tabs):
    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/5585/28037816.png
    So, I go to work making my adjustments to the RAW file (a NEF, since I shoot Nikon) and end up with something like this:
    http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/3703/43700549.png
    Now I right click on the picture and go to edit it in Photoshop CS4. I have my format set to work in 8-bit PSD files at 300 dpi(Aperture>Preferences>Export), and am using the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color profile embedded in the picture. My proofing profile in Aperture is also set to this same profile (View>Proofing Profile), as well as the working profile in Photoshop CS4 (Edit>Color Settings). And this is what I get:
    http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9311/35278285.png
    Note that I haven’t made a single adjustment in Photoshop! It just opens that way!
    Let’s say I go a step further and try to recover my desaturated image. I’ll apply a series of filters here that I normally wouldn’t for this image, but will do here to further illustrate my point. Here’s what I produce:
    http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/6954/97748984.png
    And now for the fun part. I save (File>Save) the image in Photoshop making sure to Maximize compatibility (since Aperture can’t seem to read it if I don’t select this) and Aperture faithfully works to update the preview of the image. Unfortanately, the image now looks like this:
    http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/9811/77252849.png
    So basically, I have no color management occurring from program to program. I know photographers use both of these programs successfully, but I just can’t make them preserve color faithfully! It happens with TIFF files, it occurs no matter if I use a PC, or either version of Aperture or Lightroom! I’ve tried multiple Macs and multiple OS versions, and am clearly missing something.
    Help me!
    (The minor issue I described above may be corrected if we can get this fixed, so I’ll follow-up if needed.)

    Lets see if we can figure this out.
    I personally use a calibrated Apple Cinema Display to start with so maybe that makes a difference.
    So, in Aperture do this
    1) edit the image of choice
    2) if you like go ahead and set the onscreen proofing profile -let's use sRGB 2.1 in this example
    — View>Proofing Profile then select sRGB on the top
    3) Then select the "Onscreen Proofing" so it is checked also under the View menu
    4) Go to your Aperture Export presets
    — Aperture>Presets>Image Export
    5) The very top preset usually is "JPEG - Original Size"
    — make sure the color profile is "sRGB IEC61966-2.1"
    — make sure "Black Point Compensation" is NOT checked
    Now, the image you just edited go ahead and "export Version" and save it to the desktop
    When done open it in Photoshop.
    Make sure that your color settings in Photoshop is set to sRGB
    HOWEVER, if it isn't, you may get a message that the "embedded profile does not match your working space in photoshop"
    NOTE: if Photoshop is set to Adobe RGB , that too is ok and that's when you will get the "mismatch profile message"
    So, IF you DO get that message, the rule is ALWAYS Honor the embedded profile of the image/photo
    If your Photoshop is set to sRGB too, then you won't need to worry about this.
    If your image still looks washed out at this point let us know.
    In my case what I export from Aperture 3 looks the same in Photoshop CS4
    Message was edited by: Falcon01

  • Color Management With CS2 & Lightroom

    I think I have finally figured out how to sync all my color management settings with CS2, Lightroom, my Nikon300, and my jpg viewing software. All are set to color profile sRGB and a picture looks almost exactly the same in every program.
    My main use with these programs and the desire for good color is shooting a ton of basketball game pictures and color correcting and painting them in Photoshop.
    My question: Is sRGB the best choice color profile, or does anyone have an opinion on an alternative profile.
    Thanks for your opinions.

    Okay, that's what I'm looking for is an opinion or two. I take these "Photoshopped" files and print 8x10's on my Epson R800 and I'm still fighting a little with what's on my screen versus what prints. I know that's another whole issue, but I just wanted to feel I was at least on the right track with the color management and color profile choices.

  • Dual monitor color settings seems to be messed up cs4

    Hi
    My daughter has this setup
    AMD 9550 quad 2.2mhz machine, Windows 7 ultimate. latest updates
    ATI Radeon HD 5700 gpu card (latest driver)
    Two LCD monitors
              1. LG 2361V HDMI (main)
              2. Cintiq 21UX (Extended)
    Both monitors are calibrated, and have the latest driver updates. It does not matter which monitor is the main one.
    PS cs4 also has the
    1. If i load a photo in fireworks and drag the application back and forth accross the two monitors, the image looks virtually identical.
    2. If i load the same photo in PS (cs4 11.0.1) and do the same, the image looks perfect in the LG but immediately darkens when on the Cintiq.
              a. The darkening is not instantanious. It looks good for about one second before it changes.
              b. If I hover the image between the two monitors, then the darkening only is applied to half of the image.
    3. If i change the preferences to not "color match" (in the performance->open GL) then the image does not darken and it remains loyal to the color profile in place. But!!!! the navigator and color selection tools remain darkened while on the Cintiq. So if she chooses a color from the tool, it paints a different color on the canvas.
              a. If I modify the color settings, then the modification affects both monitors display and the difference issue does not go away.
    Ideally we want to be able to select a color from the palette and have that color be what is painted onto the canvas. We also want the image to appear as similar as they do in fireworks.
    While Color Matching is checked:
    On the cheaper monitor, the image and the navigation pane always has the same color appearance. when i change the color profile, the change is reflected in both the canvas and the navigation pane.
    The same is true on the Centiq, but the image and navigation pane is always darker than on the other monitor.
    While Color Matching is UNchecked:
    The color selection tool and the navigation panel are affected but the canvas is not. But the two monitors canvases match.
    So. in order for the navigation and color selction tool to match the canvas, the color matching needs to be checked.
    But this creates the darkening on the cintiq. No matter what profile i choose, the cintiq is too dark. and photoshop is doing it because fireworks does not do this.
    How can i set it up so that all the colors are true to the profile, and match the nav and color tools?
    Thank you
    Any ideas will be appreciated.
    Jerry C

    Thanks
    @Noel
    It sounds as if the monitors are using two quite different profiles, which may indicate the calibration is off a good bit on one of them and the profile was generated to compensate.  The clue here is that you see a change when you move a document from one to the other, and that temporarily (while an image crosses both monitors) you see quite a difference in it.
    If you drag an image in a non-color-managed application across both monitors, so that specifically part of it is shown on one and part on the other, how different do they look?
    Using fireworks or MSpaint or IExplore, an image looks pretty much exactly the same on either monitor as well as when spanning accross both.
    The two monitors are clibrated so that all colors match on both monitors.
    http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/
    The Cintiq has a better contrast ratio so the whites are slightly brighter.
    But!!!  If the moitors were not calibrated, then a fireworks image would look different on each screen. In fact they look exactly the same on both.
    Even when the image spans accross the two screens.
    It is only Photoshop that darkens the part of the image that hangs onto the Cintiq. And it is very dark.
    Even in the famed "Monitor mode", the image is much darker than is is in IIE or MSPaint or Fireworks.
    I dont want to disable the color profiling, as it is important to see what the target will look like.
    But i do want to see what the target will look like! right now it is way to dark. No matter what profile i choose.
    Also my examples are more to demonstrate the comparrison between the two monitors, but the goal is to get PS CS4 to work on the centiq. It would be nice to have the navigator and some panels on the other monitor and have the colors match, but more important is to have the colors on the cintiq look normal at all!
    Thanks so far. but we are still messed up.
    Jerry C

  • Looking for a better solution to the "Save for web" color shift issue

    Ok, everyone who has fussed much with photoshop and "Save For Web" knows about the color shift issue. If you want your colors to look right after you "save for web", you have to work in the sRGB colorspace, and have Proof Colors checked (soft proofing on) and the proof color setup set to Monitor RGB, otherwise what you get looks terrible when displayed in a browser.
    But of course if you are editing for print, this is exactly what you DON'T want to do. Well, I work in both. In fact, often the same images, and I want them to appear as close as reasonably possible in both print and web formats, and without a lot of fussing on my part. And I'm pickiest about the print mode, since I have the most control there, so that's the way I want to edit by default.
    Nothing new here.
    Now comes the interesting part (in my mind, anyway). Obviously there is a known remapping -- because PhotoShop DOES it when you select Proof Colors. So the inverse mapping must also be known (with some gamut issues, but I'm not concerned with those, because, after all, I'm VIEWING it on a monitor anyway!). What I want is a plug-in that automatically applies that inverse mapping so that, when I do a Save For Web, I end up with the colors I've been viewing all the time when setting the shot up in print mode. Then, too, I don't have to worry about what mode I'm in when I'm editing -- it just fixes it when doing a save-for-web.
    Again, I want to edit in my normal print mode (typically ProPhoto colorspace, and with soft-proofing off or set to the printer/medium combination I expect to use), then do a single operation (might be a multi-step action) to "screw up" my colors so that when I then do a "Save-For-Web", the resulting image, when viewed on the average color-stupid browser, looks like the image I've been seeing in Photoshop.
    Anyone know of such a beast?   I would gladly pay for a plug-in that really works and fixes the problem.
    And if you have other solutions, I'm interested, but the absolute requirement is that it I do one single edit pass for my colors for both print and web use, and I get what I see on the screen in PS on both the prints and on the web display (i.e., working in sRGB/Monitor RGB mode all the time won't cut it). And PREFERABLY, let me do all my editing work in the ProPhoto (or at least AdobeRGB) colorspace so I have a gamut closer to what the printer can do.
    Anyone got a decent solution for this?

    Chris
    I spent all day Googling and doing side by side comparisons of my old and new systems.
    My display is a Dell U2410. It has several presets, including sRGB and Adobe RGB. I've been using sRGB.
    On my OLD system, (Win XP, PsCS2, DwCS4) there seems to be no distinction between color managed and non color managed apps, even on this wide gamut display. I could capture (digital camera) in Adobe RGB, open and edit in PsCS2, save as .psd, convert to CMYK for print, or convert to sRGB for SFW. All images looked identical and they printed and displayed perfectly. I thought this was normal, and seemed logical. This also seems to be the source of my incorrect assumptions. I was trying to get my new machine to behave like my old one.
    So I get this new machine (Windows 7, PsCS5, DwCS5) and now (still in sRGB display mode) all color managed apps appear de-saturated. Non color managed apps are OK. If I switch the display to Adobe RGB, color managed apps are OK, but non color managed apps are way too saturated. From my investigation, I believe this is normal behavior on a wide gamut display. I've tried changing the Control Panel > Display > Screen Resolution > Advanced settings > Color Management options, but to no avail. Either I'm missing something, or Windows 7 is doing color management differently.
    It seems my only option now is to use Adobe RGB display setting for Ps, etc. and switch to sRGB for Dw and non color managed apps. Or, have 2 separate files for print and web. I've Googled 'til my eyes are numb and still not sure I'm getting this. Any enlightenment would be greatly appreciated.
    Finally, I don't see an edit function here, so I can't remove my previous incorrect reply. Moderator, please feel free to do so.
    Thanks

  • Color management issue from Photoshop Acrobat

    I'm having an issue that I believe has been isolated to Acrobat X related to Color Management, but was referred to this Photoshop forum because more experts in color management tend to read here. My thread in the Acrobat forum with several updates on tests is here: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4646650#4646650
    The short version is that any RGB image I create in any app (including Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign, a non-Adobe app with Word, and Acrobat's own PDF from Screen Capture feature) displays in both Acrobat X and Adobe Reader with dull colors, very similar (if not identical) to how an RGB file with full intensity colors (i.e. R255 or G255) looks when converted to CMYK.
    I've tried numerous settings in the Color Management system, and have Synchronized my Color Settings via Bridge across all Adobe CS6 apps. I've tried synchronizing to both the default North American General Purpose 2, and the (sometimes suggested) Monitor Color, using a calibrated profile for my Dell display from OS X's built-in tool. Have also tried various settings of Preserving Embedded Profiles, ignoring them, Assigning a new Color Profile to a document, turning off color management completely, etc. No change in result.
    I have a multi-monitor setup (3 external Dell displays connected to a Macbook Pro, 2 of them via USB video devices), but I've also tried making each display (including the laptop's built-in display) my Primary monitor and can see the color shift on each one, so it doesn't appear to be a calibration issue.
    This issue is on my Mac at the office. I have a similar setup at home (albeit a MacPro 1,1 vs. a laptop) but with the same Dell monitors and CS6 software installation, and I can take the same document (whether it's InDesign, Illustrator, or Photoshop), make a PDF of it, and it displays with 100% accurate colors when viewed in Acrobat X.
    In addition to the tests mentioned in my original thread, I've also tried uninstalling and reinstalling both Acrobat X and Adobe Reader.
    I believe the issue is related to Acrobat, as I can repeat the issue with no other apps than Acrobat in the workflow: if I display a full-intensity RGB image on screen, then use Acrobat X to create a PDF from Screen Capture, the resulting PDF immediately shifts to the dull colors.
    Have also thoroughly checked through Acrobat's preferences, as it seems almost as if there's a setting somewhere along the lines of "View all PDFs in CMYK color gamut", but no such setting exists. I did a complete uninstall of Acrobat X as well, which I imagine would also dump its Preferences, so it would be a clean reinstall.
    Another interesting note: Apple's Preview app seems to display the PDF with accurate RGB colors, so I know the PDF actually has the correct color definitions intact. But the same PDF opened in Acrobat X or Reader side-by-side displays the dull colors.
    Any thoughts?
    -R

    i wasn't able to follow your lengthy post, and the color management chain is too complicated (for me) to address here other to say Acrobat reads tagged elements and converts their colors to Monitor RGB (so you must have stripped the profiles in the PDF, and the Acrobat CMS is applying or passing through the wrong profile)
    further, if you don't want to rely on profiles, your safest bet (for screen viewing) is to CONVERT everything to sRGB (but i would still include the profile in case someone wants to display or print the document 'accurately'
    Here is a look at a several critical color setting in Export to Acrobat that control: Downsampling, Compression, Color Conversions, Destination, and Tagging (click on image for blowup):
    PS:
    these panels were grabbed from an InDesign Export PDF process, but Photoshop should have similar options somewhere

  • Color Management issues with Illustrator

    Can someone help me figure out the color management issues I'm getting when printing on an Epson 3880 from Illustrator?
    The image comes out severely red as evident on the face. I'm not getting the same problem when printing from Photoshop, even though I set same paper profile in printing dialog box.
    I attached two printed picture (one from Photoshop CC, and one from Illustrator CC) that I took with my iphone so that you can see the printed result.  Even when I try to simulate same thing using illustrator soft proofing process, the soft proof does not show me anything close to how it gets printed out. And I tried all device simulations to see if any would match it. Im using  CMYK SWOP v2 for Color space in both programs.

    Dougfly,
    Only an hour wasted? Lucky you. Color is an incredibly complex subject. First, forget matching anything to the small LCD on the back of your camera. That's there as a basic guide and is affected by the internal jpg algorithm of your camera.
    2nd, you're not really takeing a color photo with your digital camera, but three separate B&W images in a mosaic pattern, exposed thru separate red, green and blue filters. Actual color doesn't happen until that matrix is demosaiced in either your raw converter, or the in-camera processor (which relies heavily on camera settings, saturation, contrast, mode, etc.)
    Having said the above, you can still get very good, predictable results in your workflow. I have a few color management articles on my website that you might find very helpful. Check out the Introduction to Color Management and Monitor and Printer Profiling. In my opinion, a monitor calibration device is the minimum entry fee if you want decent color.
    http://www.dinagraphics.com/color_management.php
    Lou

  • Excel 2010 ignores print server's default color settings.

    Excel 2010 ignores print server's default color settings.
    Our Setup:
    Printers are hosted on Server 2008 R2 Print Server. 
    Two local printers are created on the print server for each Xerox MFP that we have.   Example: Xerox MFP (B&W) - Default settings are set to print black and white only.    Xerox MFP
    (Color) - Default settings are set to print color.     So for every MFP we have two printers are created.
    Both variations of the network printers are deployed to the users with the Black and White version being the default.    If a user needs to print something in color, they select the Color version of the MFP printer.   This
    helps us save on color toner costs. 
    This works great for web applications, Microsoft Word, Adobe Reader, and other applications.   But, it doesn't seem to work in Microsoft Excel 2007 or 2010.   Whatever the default printer is of the two versions that are deployed,
    excel seems to hold onto those printer settings.
    Example: If your default printer is Xerox MFP (B&W), when you select Xerox MFP (Color), it still retains the Black and White selection in the printer properties.  However, if you select a completely different model printer such
    as Fax, and then go to  Xerox MFP (Color), it will pick up the necessary default color settings.
    If I install the printers locally on the user's PC/Computer, it works perfectly.   However, it doesn't work when they are utilizing the print server's printers.
    Things that I have tried:
    Different drivers for Xerox.  Global, PS, PCL.
    Different brands of printers.   Still experience the same issue.
    Different port names.  
    Different protocols, raw versus LPR.
    Different versions of excel, 2007 and 2010.
    Looked through group policy to see if I could force it. 
    Checked the excel sheet settings, black and white only was not selected.
    Tried most of the printer properties settings. 
    Created a Server 2012 print server and experienced the same result. 
    Xerox's custom configuration file editor.
    *Something to note, if I have the black and white version utilize PostScript Drivers and the color version utilize PCL driver, it correctly loads the color settings.   However, if you utilize Postscript for both versions, it doesn't. 
    I have to vary the print drivers.  Ideally, I don't want to have to do this because I want consistency between prints.

    Hi,
    Make sure you have the latest printer drivers - go to the manufacture's website, download and install if necessary.
    Jaynet Zhang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Help with Color Settings/Profiles...White's look 'yellow' when exported to PowerPoint as a .png

    I am running into this odd occurence and can't seem to figure it out.
    First - I am not an expert in the Color settings/Profiles topic but I am thinking there is an issue here.
    When I look at this image "McCroreyDigitalLogo.png" in Photoshop the 'whites' appear right.
    Then when I import it into ms PowerPoint, the whites look yellowish.
    I have done a series of 'tests' and it seems to be that the color profile out of photoshop and the one in PowerPoint are not compatible.
    I have reset my Photoshop preferences with no luck/change to the results.
    Finally, I did a screen shot out of photoshop and pasted that into Power point.  The white appeared correct.
    Could use some guidance on how to fix this one. Basically any files I run through PS, when they are imported into PowerPoint, the whites turn yellow.
    Thanks in advance

    PowerPoint is not a color managed program and can display the color values only in the color space of your monitor without any correction.
    Color managed programs like Photoshop correct the color values when displaying them in order to simulate within the color space of your monitor other color spaces, for example sRGB, AdobeRGB, the color spaces of various printers, and etc. For this reason you can not match the color in non-color managed programs to the color of color managed programs but you can do the opposite match the color in Photoshop to PowerPoint.
    There is two ways to do this:
    One way is if you want the color values in Photoshop to remain the same but be displayed in the color space of your monitor which PowerPoint is using, you can either color proof with or assign your monitor profile to the document.
    To color proof choose View > Proof Setup > Monitor RGB.
    To assign, choose Edit > Assign Profile, select Profile and from the menu choose the color profile of your monitor. If you are not sure what's the name of the color profile of your monitor, go to the Color Settings, in the Working Spaces section use the RGB menu, scroll up and check what it says after Monitor RGB-
    Both proof and assign will give the same result on your monitor but the difference is - the proof is temporary and will last only for the session and the profile, if embedded when saving the file, will stay and when open in other color managed programs including those on other users' computers the color space of your monitor will be simulated and for those users who don't use color managed programs the colors could be way off than if saved with a profile of a more common color space like sRGB.
    The other way is If you want the appearance in Photoshop to remain but the color values converted to the color space of your monitor, choose Edit > Convert to Profile, and from the RGB menu choose the color profile of your monitor. This will preserve the appearance and also match the colors in PowerPoint but like proofing and assigning you are not seeing what other users may see on their computers.
    It is not possible to see the same colors in color managed and non-color managed programs and at the same time simulate how others using different computers may see the colors because different monitors display color values differently. Color managed programs can simulate a common standard color space like sRGB while non-color managed programs can not.
    Edit: Have in mind all this will work properly if you have a color profile that describes correctly how your monitor displays colors. What you did as described in your post #6 is assign a color space that may be different than the color space of your monitor. The result is when working in sRGB color space your color managed programs will match the non color managed programs on your monitor but that doesn't mean that the actual sRGB space is displayed and any other color space simulation could be based on a wrong monitor profile.

  • Missing print settings tab in lightroom

    Anyone know how to get the print settings tab in lightroom?  I have the page setup tab--but not the print settings tab.

    I was watching Julianne Koss on AdobeTV talking about printing in Lightroom 5.  The left bottom part of her screen has two “tabs”—one says “page set up” and one says print settings.  On my screen I only have “page setup”.  A great deal of her talk is about Print Settings—this is where you choose the printer, the presets, the copies, the pages, the print settings, media type, color, color settings, print quality---pretty much everything having to do with printing.   I don’t have that tab…VERY  frustrating!
    Hers looks like the first attached photo  (see tabs that say page setup and print settings)
    Mine looks like the second attached photo  (see only page setup tab)
    Thank you for your help.
    Take care,
    Maren Aberle
    <http://www.firsttracksphotography.com/> www.firsttracksphotography.com
                               logo capture 2

Maybe you are looking for

  • Timing of Report (function body returning sql) w/ pagination

    Hey - Wondered if someone can provide some insight here... I have a report that is dynamically created by calling a function that returns sql. Since it may return a few hundred results I have pagination turned on allowing the user to choose rows per

  • Re: error code

    can anyone help me and explain this message im getting from fcp while editing. AN UNEXPECTED ERROR OCCURRED (error code -600) im running FCP Studio pro on powerbook 17" g4. thanks

  • Reading .txt file on Windows Server 2008

    I have a Java 7 application that we distribute, and it reads configurations from a .txt file distributed with it, in the same directory as the .jar file. On Windows 7, windows XP, Windows 8, this works fine, but on our server, running Windows Server

  • Java loop question - I think!

    Hello, I currently have the below code which opens a file, reads all the contents and prints it. I would like to modify it such that it the searches the file for a particular word e.g. "from" and when it reaches it, it inserts something after it e.g.

  • Windows 7 64-bit and Quicktime - stamp sized image of player

    I have Windows 7 64-bit and downloaded the latest iTunes/Quicktime program.  iTunes works fine.  When I open Quicktime, the logo appears in the tray, indicating it is open.  However, nothing opens up on the screen.  When my mouse hovers above the "Q"