COMMPR01 Condition Rate vs ERP Moving Average Price

Hi,
Can someone please explain how the COMMPR01 product u2018condition rateu2019 is maintained in SRM?
The reason Iu2019m asking is that the ERP moving average for the same material is different from the SRM COMMPR01 u2018condition rateu2019 value.
This causes a problem because we source our MDM catalog data from ERP instead of SRM. If a shopper shops via the SRM internal catalog for a material that also resides in MDM, the shopping cart will show two different prices. The
Is this a bug or are we doing something wrong?
Thanks,
Jerry

Hi,
You cannot maintain the condition rate in SRM for the materials which are replicated from backend, it will be applicabel only for the locally maintained materials.
Regards
Jagadheesh

Similar Messages

  • Increase moving average price in a STO process

    Dear all,
    I have a STO (MM/SD) and I need to increase my moving average price in 10 %.
    So, I added a new condition ZTPC in a standard price procedure RM2000 as attached.
    My problem is I can only account this condition and increase my moving average price if the accruals is checked.
    Does anybody could help me?

    Hi,
    If i understood you requirement correctly.
    You are looking an new condition in existing STO standard pricing procedure;
    RM2000
    Stock Transfer Document
    This new condition should add to existing MAP price in pricing procedure when ever it is manually updated.
    You very well insert a new condition in the existing STO pricing procedure similar as A001 condition type with accruals tick.
    You need to maintain an account key in your pricing procedure against new condition type with manual entry option.
    You can create a new transaction event Key also follow the below path
    OLME-->Conditions-->Define Price Determination Process-->Define Transaction/Event Keys
    Goto OBYC and maintain the G/L accounts against your defined accruals and account keys.
    After each goods receipt and accruals will get off set against the G/L account maintained in OBYC.
    Rgds,

  • How to distribute exchange rate difference to material with moving average price?

    Hi community,
    Exchange rate differences are not distributed into the items based on the shipment (per article/material). Is there a workaround available based on the GR/IR exchange rate difference and the material that was purchased?
    Thank you and best regards,
    Barbara Dörr

    Hi Lokesh,
    thanks a lot for the quick answer, but I
    had read this documentation and only found this documentation of exchange rate
    difference posting:
    GR/IR clearing uses the exchange rate of
    the goods receipt. The GR/IR clearing run completely clears Unbilled Payables
    and Purchases in Transit. The run calculates price differences of EUR 155 and exchange rate differences of EUR
    135. The price differences are posted to the price difference account and the
    exchange rate differences to the exchange rate difference account.
    Therefore I guessed that the exchange
    rate differences are NOT distributed to the material with moving average price.
    Best Regards,
    Barbara

  • Moving Average Price---Intercompany sales process

    Hi,
    I have a special requirement in Intercompany process..
    I want the Ordering company to be charged  with Moving Average Price of the Material instead of the Normal Price.
    Can some on help me out with this?
    Thanks,
    Challa.

    Hi,
    In general i hope, system will not copy the moving average price from the material master through VPRS Condition.  In case its not copied then you need to write the logic in alternative condition coloum to copy the moving averate price.
    Please confirm whether VPRS is working for moving average price, if not then develop the logic as below -
    based on Material and plant, go to table MBEW with selection as MATNR and WERKS bring the value from the field VERPR where VPRSV=V.
    Plese confirm for my knowledge also
    Regards
    Goutham

  • PROBLEM WITH MOVING AVERAGE PRICE

    Hi,
    Correct me if I’m wrong, but from what I know the moving average price should only change or be recalculated when purchases or goods_recipts are made, otherwise items should be consumed at a FIXED moving average price (cost). 
    I´ve noticed when looking into the Inventory Audit Report that the moving average price is changing in my installations and I see that SAP BO recalculates it every time an issue is made. This last thing only happens when the total amount of the transaction is rounded or left with 0 decimals and the other types such as prices, rates, quantities, percent, etc. are left with 2 or 3 decimals.
    Because of my country settings, the total amount has to have 0 decimals (I live in Chile and we don’t have cents in our currency) and the moving average price of an Item should not change when an issue is made, can you help me with this?
    Thanks and best regards to you all.
    Fernando

    Hi Nagesh,
    Thank you for your quick response.
    I understand what you say, but moving average price should not change when an issue is made and that´s what is bothering us.
    The difference between what it shoud be and what SAP BO is calculating is our concern, ie: let´s say the number of transactions is 100, would that difference be negligible?
    Here is an example:
    Goods issue:
    SO 8     11     -10,49     166,67     -1.748     99,35     16.559
    SO 9     11     -10,49     166,673     -1.748     88,86     14.811
    SO 10     11     -10,49     166,678     -1.748     78,37     13.063
    SO 11     11     -10,48     166,684     -1.747     67,89     11.316
    SO 12     11     -10,56     166,681     -1.760     57,33     9.556
    Note that coma (,) is decimal separation and period (.) is the mile separator.
    Where the 3rd line is the quantity of the goods issue, the 4th is the moving average, and the 5th is the total quantity of the issue.
    So you see 10,49 x 1748 = 1748,39977= 1748(SAP) and then SAP BO recalculates the AVG. Price.
    The problem I was talking about was the difference of the stock AVG Price with one hundred transactions or so... now the difference seems negligible (166,7 - 166,681 = 0,011).
    Can you see it changes?, is that a bug?
    Thank you
    Fernando

  • With Moving Average Price"V" ,in import Process

    Hi
    All
    With Moving Average Price"V" , I want to post the Exchange Rate Difference Between GRN And MIRO to seperate G/L Acc. not for Stock Acc. in Import Process.
    Presently it is posting to Stock Acc.
    Can any one tell me
    Regards
    Manju

    Hi
    In SPRO - SAP IMG- Material Management - Logistics invoice verification - Income invoice- Activate direct posting to G/L accounts and Material accounts
    Then do the MIRO
    And try it out.
    REgards,
    Raman

  • Affect of discount on COGS and moving average prices

    Hi experts,
    I want your suggestion to build following scenario in SAP;
    Case: During purchase order, vendor has given special discount for a material when purchased for a specific customer.
    Requirement: I need to know following;
    1. How are those specific prices could be reflected in COGS?
    2. How do those specific prices affect the moving average price? is there any way to avoid this effect in the COGS?
    Thanks

    Hi Pirzada
    Considering that you are working with material ledger system will calculate moving average price doesn´t matter the discounts conditions you had during month.
    System will revaluate all consumption considering this moving average price.
    Maybe you could think about Splliting Valuation feature ou  Make to Sales Order scenario.
    These are ways to have a specific cost using the same part number.
    Regards
    Fred

  • How to view materials with selected moving average price

    Dear Gurus,
    How to view materials with moving average price greater than some selected value?  ie..Is there any report which takes moving average price as input?
    Thanks in advance,
    Sastry

    HI
    While checking any table or report u cannot give conditions (more than this value).
    If it mabe the case, down load the data from table MBEW - Field Name VERPR  to excel file. then u apply conditions, like greater than this value.
    U'll get the desired out put.
    Thanks
    Raman

  • Intercompany Sales Processing- Moving Average Price

    Hi,
    I have a special requirement in Intercompany process..
    I want the Ordering company to be charged  with Moving Average Price of the Material instead of the Normal Price.
    Can some on help me out with this?
    Thanks,
    Challa.

    Hello,
    You can control it using formulas via VOFM ,for the conditions IV01, PI01 (statistical) but I would suggest a more standard solution using VPRS condition.
    Condition Type VPRS in the intercompany-billing document indicates cost to the supplying company code and it's used to retrieve the cost of the material accessing the valuation segment of the material master for getting the standard cost or the moving average cost. Condition category G accesses the standard cost  and condition category T always accesses the moving average price.
    The use of two different condition types in Intercompany billing is necessary to ensure that data is transmitted correctly to the financial statement (Component CO-PA).
    Having VPRS condition correctly determined You can use a formula to make Your PI01 condition equal to the VPRS.
    Tell me if it helped you !
    Thanks,
    Alcides Fialho

  • REM wip and moving average price

    Hi,
    I am working in REM scenario. my fert item is having moving average price say Rs 2.Currently zero stock of finished item. I am having a planned orderA quantity 10  from Oct 1st to nov 30th. when i do backflush at nov 30 , i do assembly backflush and post auto GR of 10 quantity. after doing settlement, i got my moving average price as Rs12.
    I have another planned order B for quantity 20, same finished item from oct 15th to dec15th. On nov 30th when i am doing component backflush or activity backflush of second planned order( i am not doing assembly backflush on nov 30 because this order is not yet completed, it will complete on 15th December), system is posting all cost on my existing stock of finished item and increasing the moving average price of finished item from Rs 12 to Rs 17.
    But this is wrong because cost should not exceed for existing stock, cost should be posted for WIP..
    Please tell me how to correct this?
    how to calculate WIP in REM? is it mandatory to go for reporting backflush? i have only one operation in my rate routing i.e labor hours is my only operation  in 0010.
    Regards.

    Hi,
    Thanks for ur help.
    But my doubt is something different!
    If i have a planned order' A'( qty 10)which is completed in Novemeber month and another planned order 'B' ( qty 20) which is still in WIP on November end, and at this stage if I do backflush for planned order A, cost flows properly and finished item is put in stock with some moving average price.But when i book labor hours again for planned order B, it books cost. But this time i do not do assembly backflush because production is not yet finsihed.so stock quantity is still the old one i.e 10 qty.So second cost booking goes to the stock item of 10 qty and increases the moving average price. system dfoesnt understand that second labor hours is booked for second planned order . this is happening because both planned orders are of same finished item.
    please reply.
    please tell me what is the way to do reporting backflush. what settign we need to do? can it solve my issue?? because my target is to book cost in case of second planned order as WIP and do NOT effect the moving average price of existing stock.
    Regards.

  • Updating the Moving Average Price

    We want to adjust the price of a material to account for storage overhead by adding 10% to the price. We have found procedures to modify the price if the price control is standard, but none for moving average prices.
         As I understand it, the moving average price is re-calculated for a material every time stock is received and the new value is stored in table MBEW (VERPR). We’ve pretty well determined that we don’t want this to change. Rather, it seems best to simply add 10% at goods issue time (and do a split valuation for the account assignment).
         I’ve examined transaction MIGO for user exits and found a couple that look promising: EXIT_SAPM07DR_001 (Customer Function Exit: Material Document Item for GR/GI Doc) and EXIT_SAPM07DR_002 (Customer Function Exit: Acct Assgmt for Multiple Acct Assgmt). I didn’t find any BADIs.
         Has anybody used these exits for this purpose? Are there other exits or BADIs that would be more appropriate? Does it make sense to change the price this way at all?
    Thanks
    Rob
    Well, I got about the response I expected. I'll close it in a couple of days if no one has any ideas.
    Message was edited by: Rob Burbank

    Hi Rob!
    I found this thread again and started reading a little bit.
    I can't follow your problem.
    When you have PO and vendor invoice, then we should talk about goods <b>receipt</b>. Then it's quite usual to add additional values (like freight costs, taxes, customs...), which are not part of vendor invoice, but can be part of goods receipt value (depends on statistic flag).
    When you have goods <b>issue</b>, then you have internal movement (to a different company code) or sales process. Then you should not increase goods value above moving average price - otherwise goods receipt of 100 PC and goods issue of same 100 PC won't end up with 0 value. Your revenue (for storage costs, handling fees, packing material...) can be added in an invoice for the sold goods - but that's not part of VPRS (stock value).
    The question, if you display something in an outgoing invoice is just related to printing - internal documents can be larger.
    Also selling based on saved conditions (not based on VPRS + surcharge) is an option -> free defined surcharge, no possibility for outsiders (personal in warehouse) to follow up the mark-up.
    But I guess, your thinking about extension of an existing process: you might have already an unusual starting point for process design.
    Work-around? Yes, I've heard of customers, where end-of-year balance is 'tuned' in excel before presentation to officials. There are many ways to solve a problem
    Regards,
    Christian

  • Moving average price for article is negative

    Hi gurus,
    We are facing this error during invoice verification,
    Moving average price for article/material  is negative : article/material  155521 4001
    I have searched the forum and got the transaction S_P00_07000139 to track how it went to negative,
    but i am having difficulty to identify which column i have to look into to see what caused the negative price.
    If i am in a wrong direction, please advise me gurus how to get rid of this error and measures to avoid in future.
    Thanks in advance,
    Kind regards,
    Gopio.
    Edited by: Naga Gopathi on Nov 27, 2009 12:59 AM

    guys i am facing exactly the same issue..........
    moving average price is negative for the material X.....plant Y and its happening in case of return PO
    please suggest the solution
    I have also checked the change log and unfortunately there are no changes done  in the price for the line item
    Price in PO 10 INR
    GR movement type 161 10 INR
    Rebate at GR 1 INR but this is a statistical condition type and document type is NBR
    Edited by: Sap: IN on Apr 27, 2010 9:29 PM

  • Moving average price based on valuation type for material

    Gurus help needed.
    we want to maintain the moving average price of the material in the pricing, and this depends on the Valuation Type. We have 3 valuation types.
    If valuation type is blank then one MAP(Moving average price) value will come and if nn one map will come and for nn one map will come.
    We have copied VPRS conditon type to YVRP and changed conditon category as T( Moving cost).
    But in pricing the YVRP price is not picking from valuation type which is blank.
    Where can  i make the settings to tell the system to pick the moving average price from the material master where the valution type is blank always based on the condition.
    Do we need to creat a routine? If so is there any standard routine which we can use or make minor changes to it?
    If it is a new routine please tell me how to start with VOFM?
    Note : We need the value to come automatically from material master same as VPRS.

    Hi
    The first method is not to set the pricing condition VPRS as statistical.
    Simply remove PR00 and it will work fine if you always use VPRS as your pricing base inside the pricing procedure.
    VPRS will reads both prices based on the price control in the material master. 
    Price control S for standard price. 
    Price control T for moving average price. 
    It is this simple if you do not have any other "Prices" in the price procedure. 
    However, if you are using one pricing procedure where for some items you price using VPRS and some others using PR00, then you should use requirement routines to enable the correct price condition type at the right time. 
    The second method involves more work as you need to write a formula (VOFM) to get that information. 
    This is how it goes :- 
    1. Set VPRS to be the first step in the pricing procedure and to be subtotal B (as standard). 
    2. Set PR00 with alt. calc. type formula, which sets the value of PR00 to be equal to the subtotal B.
    Step 1 VPRS statistical, subtotal B, reqt 4 
    Step 2 PR00 Altcty 600 
    With regards
    baalakrushnan.da

  • Moving average price  based on date range, site and article.

    Hi ABAPers,
    I am working on SKU wise sales report. Based on user input of date range ,site and article I fetch data from VBRP table i.e., (billing data from stores) . I have searched a lot to find MAP but dint get convincing solution.
    I tried to get data from MBEW-VERPR but that doesnot give MAP for a given date. I also tried with condition record table and KONP table but not helpful.
    I also got to know about s031 and LIS configuration I am not sure whether functional consultant should do the changes.
    Kindly help me in obtaining the MAP for particular bill date, article and site(store).
    Regards,
    Dep

    You can found the moving average price in MBEW (current) and MBEWH (history table)
    The first goods movement after the period closing program updates the period in MBEW and writes the data of the previous period to table MBEWH
    - If you actually need map on a daily (or less) basis, you will have to calculate it from MBEW, MBEWH, MSEG and BSIM (...)
    - You could also look for the actual cost in MSEG related to records of VBRP.
    Regards,
    Raymond

  • Return Delivery to Vendor vs Moving Average Price

    Hi All!
    Scenario:
    1 - Imagine a PO with freight conditions. (Ex: Qty=10; Unit Price=10; Freight (Value)=10 from another vendor)
    2 - Do the GR normally. (if it´s a new material should have a moving average price of 11)
    3 - Return delivery to vendor of Qty=1 >> in the FI document it makes a movement of 10 (material cost)+1(related freight)
    When I make the return the movement take into acount the related freight value (=1) . Is it possible to do the return of Qty=1 but the freight value increasing the moving average price?
    Best regards,
    Joã

    HI ,
    In this case , you can do Retunr PO with reference original PO and change the Price from Rs.100 to Rs150.
    Then , Make GRN for the same and do the Credit Memo in MIRO transaction.
    If any doubt  , let me know.
    With Regards
    S.Siva

Maybe you are looking for