Compatibility PLSSS READ!!!

heloo, i have the mobo msi 880gm-e41 and the processor AMD phenom II x4 965 which have 125w and the mobo supports only 95w . is there any update for bios or could i put the proc on the mobo even though the TDP is with 30w higher. will the mobo see my proc or can i do something to see it??
i can't return it to the shop and i don't know what to do!!! PLS HELP
anyone who made this, had worked?

No, if you put the CPU in you will burn the board.
Go back to the shop, else sell the CPU and buy a 95W CPU.

Similar Messages

Acrobat 8.1 SDK Compatibility with Reader 9?

I have a Visual Basic application that displays PDF files using the AxAcroPDF object. This application was developed using documentation/examples from the Adobe Acrobat 8.1 Software Development Kit. The application contains references to the Adobe Acrobat 8.0 Browser Control Type Library 1.0 and the Adobe Acrobat 8.0 Type Library.
Currently, PC's running this application have Adobe Reader 8.1 installed. Can I install and run this application (without compatibility errors) on a PC that has Adobe Reader 9 installed? Or, will I first have to incorporate Adobe Acrobat 9 SDK?
Is there any documentation which addresses capatibility issues between Adobe Acrobat SDK and Adobe Reader versions?
Thanks for any help you may provide.

I did find some compatibility documentation at:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/reader/articles/reader_compatibility.html
None of the items in this documentation appeared to relate to the type of PDF viewing I have incorporated into my Visual Basic Application.
I also did not see anything about having to change references to type libraries when moving to Adobe Reader 9. It would be great if my application was compatible with both Reader 8 and Reader 9.
Again, any insight on this subject would be appreciated.

Form compatability with Reader

I've created a dynamic XML form (*.PDF) and set the default compatability to Acrobat/Reader 8.0 in LiveCycle ES (v 8.2.1.3144.1....) and when I go to open it on a computer with 9.2 reader, I get a message indicating that it requires the Traditional Chinese Language Support package. When I try to open it in 8.2 Reader, it just gives the standard message that I need a later version of the PDF viewer (note that this same message appears behind the Traditional Chinese Language Support Package dialog box when opening in 9.2).
I have gone through the document and don't see anything referring to fonts or anything else Chinese related. My form properties indicate the form locate as English (USA).
Any ideas?

Thank you for going through all of that. I had done the same thing over the weekend and found the same thing. Just for anyone running into this problem down the road, here is what I did:
- Instead of directly importing the Word document into LiveCycle (that generated a master page for every page in the document which was undesireable although I'm not sure why) I used the Adobe PDF/Convert to Acrobat PDF option that gets added to Word when you install Acrobat Pro. In that I had selected the option to embed the fonts and used the 6.0 compatibility option.
- When that was opened with the LiveCycle, the way I found the discrepency was by noticing that the font that was showing for each of the controls was "TimesNewRoman" (no spaces between the words) and any new controls that I put on the form where I wanted that same font showed as "Times New Roman" (spaces between words).
Again, many thanks for wading through that whole thing. There are many things about the conversion which were undesireable, namely that any paragraph of static text got broken into the separate Text areas for each line, and where a given line had an embedded word or words that were bolded/italicized/underlined, the conversion turned that single Text area into 3 different ones...the first for the text leading up to the bold/italicized/underlined word(s), a second for the those word(s) and a third for the remaining text. That is quite messy, however I'm not sure that creating a document of the length I had (12 pages) would any easier to create from scratch in LiveCycle.
Don't get me wrong...this is a really powerful tool, but it is a bit klugey to use for developing documents from scratch.

ADOBE ACROBAT 8 PRO. COMPATIBILITY WITH READER 8

I have been creating forms successfully with them being edited by people with any version of Acrobat Reader. All of a sudden, certain version of Reader can not save my interactive forms and can only print hard copies - is this the result of a recent software update? Or is there a tick box I need to reset?
Any help greatly appreciated as always

Thanks - I got there in the end, I was looking for the ability to change the settings in Livecycle Designer and didn't realise you had to open re-open the doc in Acrobat to enable user rights.

Designer 8.0 Form compatibility with Reader 6.0 - error message

I created a form in Designer 8.0. I saved it to be compatible with 7.0, but for the most part need for it to be compatible with Reader 6.0, which is not an available option. This form actually works fine in Adobe Reader 6.0 but whenever a user initially opens the form, a message pops up advising the user that all features may not work and recommending that the user upgrade. Clicking on OK then produces a new message advising the user that they must upgrade and providing the link. Notwithstanding that message, if the user clicks Cancel the form opens and can be used as intended, with a few nonfunctioning features (like the Print button on the form). Most of the intended users are running Adobe Reader 6.0, so any help on preventing one or both of messages would be very much appreciated. (Note: This same issue was posted on March 2, 2006 related to Designer 7.0, but no answer was supplied. Im hoping there is an answer to this issue for Designer 8.0).

I created a form in Designer 8.0. I saved it to be compatible with 7.0, but for the most part need for it to be compatible with Reader 6.0, which is not an available option. This form actually works fine in Adobe Reader 6.0 but whenever a user initially opens the form, a message pops up advising the user that all features may not work and recommending that the user upgrade. Clicking on OK then produces a new message advising the user that they must upgrade and providing the link. Notwithstanding that message, if the user clicks Cancel the form opens and can be used as intended, with a few nonfunctioning features (like the Print button on the form). Most of the intended users are running Adobe Reader 6.0, so any help on preventing one or both of messages would be very much appreciated. (Note: This same issue was posted on March 2, 2006 related to Designer 7.0, but no answer was supplied. Im hoping there is an answer to this issue for Designer 8.0).

Harddrive Upgrade Compatability (Please read....)

PLEASE HELP!!! I have a HP dv8305us laptop and my harddrive failed. I was looking at the Western Digital 320 gb/5400 rpm/8 mb cache harddrive. Is this compatible for my laptop? Also the transfer rate is 3 gb/s max. Would this work normal if i install it on my laptop?
I know my laptop currently came with 80 gb/5400 rpm/100 mb/s.
So can it support 320 gb/5400 rpm/3 gb/s???
If not, what's the maximum specs it can support? Please help, i dont want to buy the wrong harddrive.
Thanks!

The picture in the Manual definitely shows a PATA/IDE hard drive (dual rows of pins) and the table at page 173 clearly says ATA (IDE) 5 or 6....in other words NOT SATA. I have worked on dv8000s and the older ones are PATA drives and then at some point in the series they became SATA. Exactly where I am not sure but I looked on 2 or 3 parts websites and they were selling PATA/IDE drives as replacements for your exact model. I am possibly mistaken, though and your drive could well be a SATA. You can resolve the issue yourself. Pull the old drive and see what it is. It will take 5 minutes.

Backward compatibility problem...acrobat 8.0 vs reader 6.0

Not sure if this is the right forum, but will start here & move if necessary.
We have been using Acrobat 8.0 for 2-3 years & have never had a problem 'til now. We will be creating a series of documents 1-10 pages long, with sound clips in them & anticipate that some of the systems viewing the documents may be as dated as W98, so we set the PDF configuration to be backward compatible to reader 6.0.
Earlier today I downloaded a copy of reader 6.0, just to make sure all worked...it didn't. Instead, I get "this file appears to use a new format that this version of acrobat does not support."
The document I used to test was, again, creadted w/acrobat 8.0, set for backward compatibility to reader 6.0. The document was 4 pages long with 4 color photographs & 2 .mp3 sound clips embedded.
Anybody have any ideas where the problem is? The test file reads OK on current version readers, so does Acrobat 8.0 not really generate backward compatible documents?

Follow Bernd's suggestion. You probably added something to the file after creation (like the sound clips) and the method you used is not AA6 compatible. Saving the file (or save as) does not preserve the version compatibility, but changes it to AA8. To maintain backward compatibile versions, you have to be sure you do not add AA8 only features and use Reduce File Size or PDF Optimize to save the file as an AA6 compatibile file.
Typically AA6 will open an AA8 file, but will ignore any new feature. You may have added something it can not handle. I don't recall if AA6 could handle embedded mp3 files.

I have a MacBook Pro (15-inch, Late 2008) and am currently running Snow Leopard 10.6.8. I would like to know which is the most stable upgrade for my model. I have read some reviews of Maverick and Yosemite making the older macs slower. Is this true?

I have a MacBook Pro (15-inch, Late 2008), Intel Core 2 Duo 2.53 GHz, 4GB Memory. and am currently running Snow Leopard 10.6.8.
I would like to know which is the most stable upgrade for my model? Mountain Lion, Mavericks or Yosemite?
When I had gone to the apple care centre in India a few months ago to upgrade my OSX to Mountain Lion, I was told that considering my macbook pro's specs, upgrading it would just make it less efficient, and that I should stick to Snow Leopard unless I consider buying a newer mac that would benefit from it. Is this true? I find it a bit hard to believe. Which update is most recommended?
I also notice that my mac has gotten considerably slower. While using chrome, it buffers and struggles with even just 5 tabs open. Could this have something to do with my current ios? As a precaution, I have always been making sure I have enough free space on disk i.e around 70 - 100 free out of 250GB.
Any advice is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

Mavericks is no longer available from the App Store, so your choice is Yosemite. One option is to create a new partition (~30- 50 GB), install the new OS, and ‘test drive’ it. If you like/don’t like it it, you can then remove the partition. Do a backup before you do anything. By doing this, if you don’t like it you won't have to go though the revert process.
Check to make sure your applications are compatible.
Application Compatibility
Applications Compatibility (2)

How to use time stamps en how to make time stamps in Adobe Reader

How to use time stamps en how to make time stamps in Adobe Reader

Did you find a solution? I am having the same problem.
PDF compatibility level is too high. Supported PDF versions are PDF 1.3 and PDF 1.4 (Acrobat 4, 5 and 6). If you are using Acrobat 7 or higher you will need to save your file at a lower PDF compatibility level.

Internal error occured...Reader XI

I’ve been getting the message “an internal error occurred” the last few times I’ve tried using Reader XI on my Windows 8.1 laptop. I’ve even gone as far as using Revo Uninstaller AND the tool at http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/acrobatcleaner.html with no luck. It's obvious that the Acrobat cleaner doesn't work.
Even if I press okay to clear the message, the program closes down.
This is very frustrating as most State Employment Applications are in PDF format and I’ve used Adobe for years. What is the problem with Reader XI and Windows 8.1…and reformatting my machine is NOT a good answer since every other program works??
TIA

Pat,
I went back and uninstalled Reader X as somethings were working for it and then ran Revo and the Adobe tool.
I downloaded XI, disabled AVG and let it install, rebooted and and ran the program, only to get the same error message "an internal error occured". The only thing I haven't done was uninstall the app "Reader" I downloaded from the Windows store that would also allow pdf viewing.
I've switched back to Adobe Reader X and allowed it to update to 10.1.10 but it seems to run sluggish on Win8.1 even with using the Win7 compatibility mode.

After updating firefox the first window after opening first time "checking compatibility of add-ons" window is froze won't progress pas 1/3 of completion

I updated my fire fox on my MAC OS X to 3.6.6 version of firefox, everything went smooth till I open FireFox then the window firefox update opens up and about 1/3 through the process it gets stuck on Checking Compatibility of Add-ons and doesn't go any further. I have hit cancel and firefox opens but it doesn't open any web sites. I have removed firefox and re-installed and it is still doing the same thing. I have also let it run over night thinking it may just take a while and it never progresses, please advise, I am new to MAC but FireFox is the only browser on my mac that will open one of my business pages, known issue with mac for this company.
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== trying to upgrade firefox ==
== User Agent ==
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_4; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/533.16

Try "Reset all user preferences to Firefox defaults" on the [[Safe mode]] start window - See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Resetting_preferences
Delete the files extensions.* (extensions.rdf, extensions.cache, extensions.ini) and compatibility.ini in the Firefox [[Profiles|profile folder]] to reset the extensions registry.
See "Corrupt extension files": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Unable_to_install_themes_or_extensions
If you see disabled extensions that are not compatible on the next start in "Tools > Add-ons > Extensions" then click the "Find Updates" button to do a compatibility check.

PDF file compatibility

What will be compatibility for reading a old version of PDF files (say Ver. 4, 5, 6) with latest version of Adobe Reader or writer (Say ver. 9, 10, etc.).

PDF files have a version number which is not the same as the software version.
Example
PDF 1.0 - relates to Acrobat 1.0
PDF 1.5 - relates to Acrobat 6.0
PDF 1.7 - latest version (but there are later extensions with no number)
If a PDF was correctly made, all versions of Acrobat later than the introduction of the new features will work.
Later extensions include portfolios, and kinds of security.
There are many limitations on the tablet (e.g. iPad) versions of software.

Reader X - Floating Toolbar in Browser not functional

Using Reader X in "recent" Firefox version and IE 9 with Windows 7. When viewing a PDF in either browser, none of the icons in the floating toolbar respond. The cursor arrow changes shape during the rollover of the icons, but clicking on them (print, save, page up/down, etc) yields no response whatsoever. Any ideas? Behavior is with 2 of 2 browsers and all websites tested. Isolated to a single user. Thanks!

This worked:
Jun 8, 2012 7:36 AM in reply to ct-apa
Report
I read the very long thread at http://forums.adobe.com/message/3295855#3295855 discussing the exact problem with Reader X and an older version of Firefox. Although several comments mentioned changing the zoom level to 100% from something greater, I initially thought they were referring to the zoom within the Reader window. When I finally realized that they were referring to the display properties, I changed that back to 100% and the controls now work.
Although this problem has been happening to me on a custom-built rig, my display is a Dell U2412M. I think at least one other commenter in the other thread mentioned Dell, so perhaps the problem is with the Dell display driver -- where increasing the magnification causes Adobe to "see" mouse presence someplace other than where it actually is. Strage -- and this behavior doesn't appear to affect other apps..
The solution in comment 116 by solution_finder_123 works!!!. Right-click on the shortcut to Reader in the Win 7 Start Menu and select "Disable display scaling on high DPS settings" on Compatibility tab.

Output Designer 5.5 and 5.6 Compatibility

Hi,
I want to purchase the Output designer Software, just wanted to confirm few question:
1. Files(IFD) created in Older Version like 5.2 can be opened without any problem in latest Version?
2.Can the files created in Output Designer 5.6 can be opened in Output Designer 5.5?
3.What all other software is required to create a Form based application through Output Designer(like Output Server)?
4.Is there any relation of Output Server and Output Designer Version Compatibility.What I know Output Server run the compiled file which are created by Output Designer.Does the Software version of Output Designer and Output Server should be same.
Your help will be very much appreciated.
Regards,
Tarun

Older files can be opened in the latest version. If the ifd is older than 5.3 and has the "Filler" aspects included, these Filler features will be removed.
I would not expect 5.5 to open a 5.6 ifd.
Output server includes printing, faxing, email, pdf, data transformation and along with the design tool is all you need to create a document generation application assuming the data is available. Output server uses a watched folder approach and will not go and get the data from a legacy application, the data must be pushed to Output Server.
Output Server will happily process forms from older versions of Output Design. They do not need to be the same version but I would not trust a 5.6 design to a 5.5 server. Upwards compatibility yes, downwards compatibility no.

Samsung T609 Compatibility

Has anyone got the GSM Samsung SGH-T609 to work with iSync, either through the USB cable or Bluetooth?
It works fine through Bluetooth File Exchange, and iSync sees the phone, but says "iSync cannot connect to this device". Also, Address Book will let me send vCards to the phone just fine, and it says it's connected via Bluetooth, but the Call Info Display (where it tells me who's calling when my phone rings) doesn't pop up when I receive a call, even when I'm well within Bluetooth range of the computer.
I wonder how long it's gonna be before Apple adds T609 support to iSync... but until then, has anyone found a way to make it work with iSync and any Address Book features other than sending vCards? And maybe for apps like BluePhoneElite to recognize it?
Thanks,
-Aran

Unfortunately, as stated in list, no Samsung phones are iSync compatible.
I believe that this is because Samsung chose to use their own proprietary syncing protocol rather than the industry standard SyncML, or in phones that do support SyncML, their version of it is quite rubbish.
From what I read, it is very unlikely that Apple will be able to support proprietary syncing methods, so unless Samsung aligns itself with the rest of the industry, you're going to be out of luck for iSync.
Some of these links may help, however:
http://fusion94.org/blog/2006/04/22/howto-sync-a-samsung-a920-with-mac-osx/
http://www.onmadesoft.com/pgs/mobiles_samsung.html
http://www.vincenzoazzone.com/en/megacell/megacell.html
You'd have to contact the authors of the last two to ask about your phone specifically.
As this is such a common question here, I just wonder why so many people choose and buy a mobile phone, before researching its Mac-compatibility?

Compatibility PLSSS READ!!!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for