Condition record not pulled for all material

Hi,
I have three materials in sales order. now, for each material , I am maintaining some condition record in VK11. the problem i face is, if in case I don't maintain condition recrod for condtion ZCD1 for the first material A in sales order, the condtion records that I have maintain for the same condtion ZCD1 for the following materials are also not getting pulled. that's true for all conditiond in my pricing procedure. only those conditions for which system could find records for the first material, it pulls it for all other materials that follow material A in sales order. otherwise, system gives the messgae " condition record has been found but not set "
what could be the reason? this is certainly not the standard behavior.
Thanks,
Binita

I have checked this with creating new records for all material for all condtions. but, it is possible that a particular price condtion may not be maintained for the first material and which can very well be maintained for the folllowing materials. in that case, they are not pulled. the records are there for sure for other materials as 1) i could see them in VK13 and 2) the condition analysis tells me that condtion record is found but not set. no clue what it has got anything to do with first material..as soon as i maintain that condtion for first material (even zero value in Vk11), they start appearing for other materials as they are maintained.
Thanks,
Binita

Similar Messages

Condition record not found for service net price

Hi Experts,
I have seen other posts related to this topic but didnt solve my issue. Issue is: in one system when trying to create PO for requisition, it says please enter a price for service item since "condition record not found" (because package number is wrongly taken as '00000000'. i dont know why).
In another system, again the condition record was not found but its taking some non-zero value for ESLL-NETWR and successfully creating PO.
In both the systems, coding is the same. No extra coding in user-exists. I think package is not properly determined. But in tables ESLH/ESLL, i see the values are stored in exactly the same manner as in the other system. I literally see no difference.
What could be the problem?

Solved myself.
The difference was in the purchase organization data. Depending on this field there was some check: 'Ignore requisition price in PO'. This was checked in one system for a purch org due to which it was not picking the price from PR data.

Info Record Not Appearing for all materials in classic scenario.

HI ALL,
 I am working on Classic Scenario and all the follow-on documents are getting created properly. But the problem is With SOS. Currently i am able to view the info record for only one of my material, I am also referring backend contracts through vendor list. The contracts are visible in SOS.
 Can somebody pls put a light as to why for other materials the info records is not displayed in SOS, is there a report which has to be run to get the info record into SRM from ECC. If not then how does the system bring these contracts and info record from ECC to SRM.
 I am working on SRM 5.0 and ECC 5.0.
THANKS AND REGARDS
Debu

Hi
Please read this as well.
You have created sources of supply. These could be:
-> Contract items in Enterprise Buyer
-> Vendor-specific prices
For this, you have created Product Linkages in the SRM System with vendor-specific prices via the SAP Menu Master Data -> Products -> Process Products.
-> Entries in the vendor list of Enterprise Buyer
In Customizing you have assigned product categories to which the system is to automatically group requirements and you have scheduled report BP_SC_TRANSFER_GROUPED to run periodically.
For more information, see the Supplier Relationship Management Implementation Guide (IMG): SRM Server -> Sourcing -> Define Interactive Sourcing for Product Categories.
Sourcing is completely integrated with the global availability check in SAP APO and executes a vendor search. You can activate third-party order processing in the check instructions by choosing how you want the system to start sourcing and which sourcing method you want to use for it. There are two different options here:
○ If you want the products to be delivered exclusively by external vendors, the system performs sourcing directly at the external vendors without evaluating internal locations. For this, SAP APO requires corresponding purchasing records, delivery plans and contracts that are transferred from SAP ECC.
○ If you only want to have products delivered by external vendors occasionally, that is to say, if you are unable to deliver the product from your own warehouse stock, choose an ATP profile in which both internal and external vendors are evaluated. In this case, the external vendor is treated like an internal location in SAP APO, and is integrated into location determination in the rule-based availability check.
You can also choose the vendor manually. If you have already specified a vendor as the source of supply in SAP CRM, SAP SCM does not carry out any further sourcing. In this case, SAP SCM merely checks the validity of this vendor and confirms the requirement in its full amount if the vendor is valid.
For more information, see SAP Library for SAP SCM at SAP Advanced Planning and Optimization (SAP APO) -> Global Available-to-Promise (Global ATP) -> Advanced Availability Check Methods -> Third-Party Order Processing in the Global ATP -> Sourcing in Third-Party Order Processing.
Refer these links for more details ->
Assignment of Existing Sources of Supply
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/25/40f23a53cd0e04e10000000a11402f/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/55/4af548688211d4977e0004ac962ee6/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/fa/84944279c0c66ae10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/18/db183d30805c59e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/63/36f2323326da4da25d9d0a06f550a0/frameset.htm
Processing Contracts
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/43/0f234a9e242a8be10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/5a/4cc5376848616ae10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
See alsoSAP Note 519794 EBP: Replication of Materials exclusively for Purchasing
SAP Note 505030 (Restrictions for the integration of external requirements).
Regards
- Atul

Excise Invoice should not get created without J1ID data for all material

Dear All,
We have a requirement that excise invoice should not get generated unless chapter ID data is maintained for all the materials in the invoice.( when there is more than one item and chapter id is not maintained for all the items)
At present excise invoice is getting generated for single item which has chapter ID maintained and the items without chapter ID data are left out from the excise invoice. This results in an incorrect invoice.
We want to ensure that excise invoice is not created, unless all the items in the billing document have chapter ID maintained.
Kindly advise as to how this can be done.
Regards,
T Saravanan

Dear Muralidhar, Lakshmipathi,
Thanks for the solution.
I have been able to solve the problem using the user exit mentioned by you.
Regards,
T Saravanan

SD: Condition record not getting automatically determined

Hi,
Condition record not getting automatically determined for a condition type for which following access is maintained.
The access has table containing following fields:
Sales Organisation
Distribution Channel
Division
Sales Document type
Sales Document No.
Material no.
Following is the scenario:
A sales order is created for Project Systems attach a WBS element to the line item .
With respect to the above created sales order a Billing request ( a sales doc. type which is different than the above sales order). When the billing request is created materials appearing in the line item will be different.Different materials will appear in the billing request because of the DIP profile maintained.
The prerequisite is that before creating billing request the sales employee has to maintain condition master record with above access.The condition record will combine sales organisation, distribution channel, division, sales document type ,
sales document number ( the 1st refered sales order)
and the material are different
than the ones maintained in the 1st sales order.
This will enable in getting billing request generated without manual intervention in pricing for other materials for which condition records have been maintained as stated above.
Following is the error message we get
===================================
" Inactive X Inactive via formulae of incorrect "
Thanks
Aby
Message was edited by: Aby Jacob Emmanuel

As I know, thats just a warning message(if its a std one).
Ignore it and save.
Check your pricing date of the document. For execution it should be similar or after valid-from date maintain in condition record.
But, you need not create a condition record. Simply change the existing one combination of your desire. But, this warning will come there also for your combination.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Assessable value not maintained for the material X

Dear all,
i have maintained material chapter ID,Plant and materialchapter id combination ,assessable value , cenvat determination, and vendor excise details in the transaction J1ID .
Even after maintaining all these conditions , i am not able to save the po,while saving the po i got a error message that assessable value not maintained for the material X..
Points will be rewarded for useful suggestions.
Thanks in Advance.
velu+91-9789991357

Hi,
Search using approriate keywords in SDN, u get most of the details, i have now done the same searched and have pasted below .
Try ME2N.
Click on the "dynamic selections" icon and add the release indicator as an additional selection. Enter the release indicators that you class as "awaiting approval" and you will then have your list.
The ME2* series of transactions are not that much use prior to 4.7, the layout is poor. But if you have 4.7 or later you can get the screen to use the ALV format and this transforms the ME2* (i.e. ME2L, ME2M, ME2N etc.) transactions into VERY useful reports.

PS: WBS is not flowing for a Material, while creating delivery from Project

Hi,
While creating delivery from Project thro CNS0, WBS is not flowing for a Material in delivery, in turn WBS is not flowing in Billing document for same material, in turn not allowing to Post the Billing document to Accounting.
Error while releasing Billing to the Accounting: Accounting Entry is not generated. Error Message:Assign Condition type
YMRG in COPA.
Pls let me know, what can be the reason ?
Thanks.
Amit.

Hi Kuldeep,
Check this note,
Note 159387 - Message BP603: incorrect line item is displayed
Its valid only till 4.6. Might give you some idea but.
Regards,
Gokul

Licence is not included for the material - J1IH

Hi All
We are working on ECC 6.0.
While doing J1IH ( Additional Excise) with Subtransaction Type 01, we are getting a warning message as -
Licence is not included for the material
Message no. 8I993
However if we process without any Subtransaction Type, no warning is flashed.
Please let me know the reason for the same and what could be done so that system doesnt prompt it?
Regards
Kapil

Hi
Check SAP note 1223591
Regards
Antony

Hide views in MM01 for all material type in one time

Hi,
I have a requirement to hide the views for all material type at at time.
i tried with OMS2 , it is allowing me to do for one matrial type.
could any one tell me how to hide the views for all material type in one short.
Thanks in adv..

Hi Rakesh,
Up to my knowledge it is not possible to do view setting for all material type in one shot simply because it is material type dependent.
If trying to change fields in material master then use OMS9. This also material type linked to field reference group. And we can change the setting of field selection group in one shot. This will affect the material types linked to it.
Hope it helps
sBk

Licence is not included for the material

Hi,
I have maintained account ddetermination for DIEX ETT for sub transaction type 22. When I am doing Additional Excise in J1IH system is giving the warning message as "Licence is not included for the material" and it is not picking any G/L accounts. Where as without subtransaction , it is picking concerned G/L accounts. Please suggest, what I have to do?
Regards,

Hi
Check SAP note 1223591
Regards
Antony

Auto To working for one material and not working for other material

Hi,
Hope everybody is doing fine.
I have configured the auto TO. Its working fine for one material and not working for the other material. I checked the material master and wm 1,2 views have the same fileds / values. What could be wrong?
I didn't setup the back ground processing job. Is that is affecting it?
thanks for any help.
regrads,
KHAN

Thnaks,
You are right but then what could be wrong? Its working for one material and not working for otehr material? Any clue?
Appreciate your time charlie

WL6.1 : Get '404 : File not found' for all WARs

I had some web applications deployed which were running perfectly. Now suddenly
, I get '404 - File not found' for any URL - including the server root, i.e. http://localhost/
I was able to access admin console using http://localhost/console. I checked the
config of each application & couldn't find anything wrong.
Finally I had to re-deploy the WARs to get some applications running.
However, I am still unable to get the Default Web App running - the one handling
server root path.. (I've checked the server config & it shows DefaultWebApp as
the default application).
Any pointers on what could be wrong / correction needed ?
TIA,
Subodh

Create a subdirectory called 'classes' and copy your servlet class file
 to the 'classes' dir.
 mydomain/applications/
 DefaultWebApp/
 WEB-INF/classes.
 Modify the web.xml file located in the mydomain/applications/
 DefaultWebApp/
 WEB-INF/ directory
 <web-app>
 <servlet>
 <servlet-name>
 myServlet
 </servlet-name>
 <servlet-class>
 package.name.myServlet
 </servlet-class>
 </servlet>
 <servlet-mapping>
 <servlet-name>
 myServlet
 </servlet-name>
 <url-pattern>
 servlet-url-pattern
 </url-pattern>
 </servlet-mapping>
 </web-app>
 Start the default WebLogic Server.
 Call your servlet from a Web browser with the following URL:
 http://localhost:port/servlet-url-pattern
 servlet-url-pattern is the value of the <url-pattern> element that you
 defined in the web.xml file.
 prakash wrote:
 > Hi everybody ,I have this web app on weblogic 7 .The application
 > works file with Tomcat 4.0 but on WebLogic server 7,I am getting
 > 404 not found for all the servlets ,although weblogic is serving
 > the html files without any problems

Excise is not captured for all or Second line item.

Dear Experts,
Excise is not updating for all the line items in while making Goods Receipt.
while making goods receipt excise is not capturing for all the line items.
but excise is captured at header level,its presumed that all the line items
are capturing excise,please suggest me,what might be the reason.
Thanks in advance.
Varun

Hello,
As i think, you are creating Goods receipt With Excise option "Only Part1" in MIGO, then system will update only J_1ipart1 table with qty and without internal document number, after J1IEX only system will Update J_1IEXCDTL table with all value and qty and internal document number.
Suppose you have done the GR -Option' 'No excise entry" then system will not generate any Excise realted tables. Then you should Capture Part1 entry with help of J1I5 t code, then system will update qty field , here also system will not update internal doc number.
Write a Updation program for J_1IPART1 table for qty field
Mahesh Naik

Key focus is not visible for all objects when tabbing

I'm using LabView 5.1.
The key focus is not visible for all objects when tabbing through a "disabled and grayed-out" object.
For example, let's say I create a panel with 3 buttons. If I create a "disabled" attribute for button 2 and assign the value "2" (disabled and grayed-out) to it. When I will run this VI, the key navigation will go through button 1 and button 3 (skipping button 2 as expected) but the key focus on button 3 will not be visible.
Is this a bug with LabView or am I doing something wrong ?

Hi Ben,
Don't worry, time is not an issue... I'm posting an example of a VI with the problem I described. I noticed that the problem occurs only with "dialog buttons".
When you have time, let me know if you see the same behavior. If you do, I will report the problem to National Instrument.
Thanks for your time !
BigBen
Attachments:
3buttons.vi ‏22 KB

CsrAttachmentUploadDiv part attachment is not rendered SP 2013(Attach file in not working for all the list forms)?

csrAttachmentUploadDiv partattachment is not rendered SP 2013(Attach file in not working for all the list forms)?
Ravi
function ShowPartAttachment() {
ULSopi:
    if (document.getElementById("part1") == null || typeof document.getElementById("part1") == "undefined") {
        alert(Strings.STS.L_FormMissingPart1_Text);
        return;
    (document.getElementById("part1")).style.display = "none";
    (document.getElementById("partAttachment")).style.display = "block"; //problem here

Am also facing the similar problem....any iputs are highly appriciated.
Issue..
1) Defined the attachment type in IMG.
2) Added the attachment type "SFREEATTM" by selecting other attributes---> Attachment Types.
3) Attached the excel file in the design.
See the screen shot below:
The Issue is when testing through tcode nwbc in the inbox the attachment tab is not visible after selecting the particular form.
Please see the screen shot below:
Did i miss any Configuration?? Please suggest...
Regards,
Naveen

Condition record not pulled for all material

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for