Config - Line Item Sequence

As parts are automatically added using config (guided selling) when the user makes guided selling selections, can we control the sequence of the parts being added? We would like the more important parts to be listed first. And unfortunately, the more important parts are not always the most expensive which rules out the option to sort the parts to price.

Hi ,
Please check the copy control setting from sales order to Billing in the transaction VTFA.
In the there is one option / check box copy item number.
The functionality of it is , it will copy the item number from the source document to the target document.
Hope this clears.
santosh

Similar Messages

Goa line item sequencing issue

Hello experts,
I am facing a problem in GOA line item sequencing in SRM 4.0.
I create a GOA with lets say 3 line items and distribute it successfully to the backend.
Now if I want to add extra items using option 'Add Calaog items' from R/3 material and service catalog. The new items that I select and tranfer to SRM are created under line item 53 54 and so on..
Why is this gap in the line items and why I can't I get the new line items in proper sequence?
Please help.
Thanks and regards,
CM

Hello CM,
Have you received any repsonse on this? we are facing same issue.

Line Item Sequence

Hi Gurus,
When I create a F2 or F5 invoice, the line item sequence copied is different to the sequence in the sales order. Could you tell me how I can overcome this?
Many Thanks
Kumar

Hi ,
Please check the copy control setting from sales order to Billing in the transaction VTFA.
In the there is one option / check box copy item number.
The functionality of it is , it will copy the item number from the source document to the target document.
Hope this clears.
santosh

Config line item layouts for Clear transaction

hi all,
can anyone tell me how I can config these codes
Current line item layouts for Clear transaction F-32, menu Settings/ line layout:
A1     Allocation / document number
K1     Document number
K2     Reference no.
K3     Account number
K4     Account number / company code
K5     Company code
K6     Payment order
K7     Bill of exchange payment request
SA     Order
SB     Purchasing document
SP     Project
T1     Original document number
Z01     Account / Allocation
Z02     A/P - Open invoices
Z03     WBS Element
Z04     Network
ZK2     Ref. / Alloc. / Document / Reason C
thanks alot!
Tram Nguyen

Hi,
In IMG (transaction SPRO) under
Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Business Transactions -> Incoming Payments -> Manual Incoming Payments -> Make Settings for Processing Open Items -> Define Line Layout
Here you determine which information is to be made available on the screen when processing line items (for example, document type, document number, account number, company code).
Regards,
Srilatha.

How to trigger Condition Access sequence multiple times for one line item?

Hi,
We have a situation that, User will enter a Promo code (custom Field) in Sales order Header Additional data B tab to apply discount for line items.
Logic goes like this:
1. For each Promo code .. there may be multiple sale deals (Max 3 at this point).
2. For each line item (refering to tkomp table) we have to apply the sale deals (found above) the Condition access sequence will pick the right sale deal to apply the line item.
3.we have enhanced the tkomp structure to hold the sale deal.
Challenge:
As we have the standard logic to trigger the condition access sequence once for each line item, how we can apply 3 sale deals for single line item. Is there any logic or way to trigger the condition access sequence multiple times for single line item with diffrent sale deals. ~ There may be one valid sale deal for one line.
Functional team maintained diffrent access tables in the access sequence!!!
Fnds, please help me to get some clue
Thanks,
Sunil Y

Hi Eduardo , Thanks for the response.
I am trying to explain again, this is the requirment given by the functional guys.
we have Promo code in Hearder Addtional data B tab --> Have to retrieve Sale Deals -->
At this point of time we may have at max 3 Sale Deals. we don't know which sale deal is vallied for which item we have in TKOMP. We have enhanced the TKOMP structure to hold one sale deal only (ZZPROMO).
We have enhanced USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP in RV60AFZZ to populate the value in TKOMP. Then it will go for diffrent access sequence to find the proper condition.
Our challenge is that, for each line item we have 3 sale deals, we don't know which one is valid for which line. but we have to apply the vallied sale Deal to the line items. Line item 10 may have Sale Deal 2 , item 20 may have Sale Deal3 and 30 may have sale deal 1.
We may have solution, by fixing some thing in the code or through config. But i am confused that is it a valid requirment?
Please help me ...
Thanks,
Sunil Y

Sequence of material line items in Project

Hi all,
I have transfered the BOM using CN33 in the project, the systems is configured such a way that after BOM upload the system creates PR automatically but, when the PR is created in the system the sequence of the line item material is not same as that of in BOM. How this has to be solved?
Best Regards,
Nitesh H Panchal

Hi,
I am aslo using BAPI for uploading material component. What it is doing , it is creating the line item number in the sequence I am planning . Like if I planned material A first then it is creating line item number for that irrespective of its activity and WBS number.
Regards
Keshav

Line Item numbers out of sequence in C_T_DATA

We are using several different data sources within include ZXRSAU01.
For one of them, we have assigned a custom structure ZOXNRD0112 to C_T_DATA which contains two different fields for Line Item number. One of these fields is based on FAGLFLEXA-DOCLN and the other is based on BSEG-BUZEI.
The values in these two fields should agree on each record contained within C_T_DATA, but occasionally we get a situation where they do not. BUZEI is always correct when compared to the Billing Document, but DOCLN will be out of sequence.
For example:
DOCLN BUZEI
000001 001
000003 002
000002 003
DOCLN & BUZEI both arrive already populated in the C_T_DATA table.
We simply use the values as keys to read FAGLFLEXA and BSEG, the values in DOCLN & BUZEI themselves are not derived.
They are there when entering the user exit ZXRSAU01, and they are still there when processing leaves ZXRSAU01.
I donu2019t have a lot of experience in BI, and am not familiar with how C_T_DATA receives itu2019s data.
Iu2019m trying to look back further in the processing to find where C_T_DATA is populated and draw some conclusions from that. I have asked a couple of our FI people to examine the documents involved to see what could be going on there.
We are on ECC 6.0, and BI version 7.0.
Has anyone out there run into this kind of problem before?

Hello Dan,
Welcome to SDN!
The program ZXRSAU01 is an exit program for transactional DataSource extraction. Whenever the DataSource pulls data from ECC, it usually divides the data into several data packages, and for every package it will comes to that program. The internal table C_T_DATA contains all records of the data package.
We don't use sequence to link data together, but use fields mappings. For example, I want to read FAGLFLEXA-DOCLN, I first need to find a key field say XXXX which exist both in C_T_DATA and FAGLFLEXA. Then use below statement to read FAGLFLEXA:
loop at c_t_table into ls_structurename.
select single DOCLN
from FAGLFLEXA
into ls_structurename-docln
where XXXX = ls_structurename-XXXX.
modify c_t_table from ls_structurename.
endloop.
With the code we don't need to worry about sequence. And it works for either full loading or delta loading.
Please let us know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Frank

Itunes - how do i select multiple line items not in sequence ?

itunes - how do i select multiple line items not in sequence ?

Hold down the Command key and click each in succession.
To extend the selection across items that ARE contiguous, use the Shift key.

Generate sequence nuumber for line items.

Hi,
Am using jdeveloper 11.1.1.6.0
I have generated a form using master detail. po_header as master and po_line as child in po_line i need to generate the sequence number.
The problem am facing is
If i generate using create sequence in my DB. Its working fine.
consider
I have po_number 1234 for this po_line while i click the add button the sequence number is added. for eg: form 1 to 10 i have the po_line against po_number.
If am created another po_number 12345 for this while i click the add button the sequence number starts from 11...., But it need to be started from 1 since its a different po.
Could anyone help me how to acheive this?
Regards,
Prasad K T,

Hi,
in addition, have a look how you would model the line items in a database schema. Here you would have purchase orders and line items in separate tables that are linked with a foreign key. To uniquely address line items you would have a unique sequence in the line items table. What you are looking for is a combined key (purchase order AND line item ID) to have line items numbered 1 .. 10 (this however, from a database design aspect makes no sense).
Frank

Query to derive number of children "folders/nodes" and children "line items" from a numbering sequence

I am writing a query to determine some information from a work breakdown numbering structure (single column) and it is simple enough to describe, just not sure how to do it in code. I am trying to determine for the parent items, how many children items
that parent has and how many children folders are under that parent (think of something like a folder/file structure). The numbering structure looks like this:
1
1.1
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.3.1
1.2.3.2
1.2.3.3
1.2.4
1.2.5
1.2.5.1
1.2.5.2
1.3
I would like my query to return this information:
WBS ChildFolders ChildLineItems
1.1 0 0
1.2 2 8
1.3 0 0
Hope that makes sense!

I almost have this working in the following query in at least I figure out a way to tell how which ones were the folders and which were the line items with this query (sorry I have different WBS numbers than my example above:
declare @wbs table (wbs varchar(max))
insert @wbs select
'1.1' as wbs union all select
'1.2' union all select
'1.2.1' union all select
'1.2.2' union all select
'1.2.3' union all select
'1.3' union all select
'1.4' union all select
'1.4.1' union all select
'1.4.1.1' union all select
'1.4.1.2' union all select
'1.4.2' union all select
'1.5.1'
select
x.wbs
, CASE count(x.wbs) WHEN 1 THEN 'LineItem' ELSE 'Folder/Has Children' END as Description
from
@wbs x
,(select
from @wbs w) as data
where
data.wbs like x.wbs + '%'
group by
x.wbs
This give me these results:
WBS Description
1.1 LineItem
1.2 Folder/Has Children
1.2.1 LineItem
1.2.2 LineItem
1.2.3 LineItem
1.3 LineItem
1.4 Folder/Has Children
1.4.1 Folder/Has Children
1.4.1.1 LineItem
1.4.1.2 LineItem
1.4.2 LineItem
1.5.1 LineItem
I would just like to add the columns with the counts of ChildFolders and ChildLineItems like my example above.
For example the results for 1.4 would look like this:
WBS Description
ChildFolders ChildLineItems
1.4 Folder/Has Children
1 3

Profir Center Update for Vendor Line Item

Hi,
While entering an inter company document, cost center is required field for the expense line item. The system is picking up the profit center based on the cost center. However, while saving the document I am getting a error message that you can not post to profit center XX in company code 2. The profit center is only assigned to company code 1 (KE52) and it is not to be assigned to company code 2. Ideally the vendor line item should be assigned to dummy profit center maintained in config but system is picking the profit center assigned to expense line item. The following entery is being passed and the document type is AB. Document Splitting is active.
Expenses A/c. Dr - company code 1 - PC - XX
To Vendor            - company code 2
can anyone help me with the same?

Hi,
Validations are in 3 steps (Mostly Inter-company transaction fetch this validation in sequence)
1) Derivation Rule
2) Default
3) Dummy
Option 1:
T-code: 3KEI
setup default profit centre by company code and GL Account
if above does not resolve your issue then also setup option 2
Option 2:
Create substitution rule on document completion level
If G/L account is (B/S) XXXXXX u2013 XXXXXX and company code is 2
   then PC = 2
End if
try first in test system
regards,
Prashant Rane

Copying text from CMIR (KNMT) to the Sales Order Line Item

We need to copy text from the CMIR (KNMT) to the Sales Order Line Item with two steps in the access sequence. First to look up by the Ship to Partner Function. If doesn't exist, then look up by Sold to Partner Function. Have setup a new text id (ZPRN), a new access seq (9011). The access seq has one seq =5 for KNMT, ZPRN, all languages and that saves fine. When I set the Partner Function to be SH. I get the following error msg:
"The Language does not come from the partner function AG for MVKE".
Any ideas? This access seq does not reference MVKE. It only references KNMT.
Thanks!

Hi Lisa,
Just stumbled on this post, as I am searching for something similar.
What you are attempting to do isn't possible in config.
This is because as standard Customer Material Info Records are not even considered for ship-to party in the sales order.
They work for sold-to only.
Therefore, this funny error message is SAP's way of saying, "Why are you trying to enter a partner here, because the data is determined for sold to only?"
You can change this with development for other fields (ie, to determine delivery plant, tolerances etc at ship-to) by using
the exit MV45AFZB with the USEREXIT_CUST_MATERIAL_READ form.
However, even if you do this, Text Determination is still sold-to only and still doesn't behave.
I am currently looking myself for a solution for this problem and I will let you know what I find.
Cheers
Chris

Indicator 'M" in the Confirmations Tab of the PO Line item level

Hello
I just wanted to know the relevance of the Indicator " M" available in the confirmations tab of the Purchase Order line item level after the Inbound delivery is posted in the system?
Whats the impact of this indicator ?
How is it set auto ?
Whats the relevance config to set this or not to set this indicator on ?
How does it Determines whether or not the information from this confirmation category is to be taken into account by materials planning and control. ?

Hi,
Indicator: Confirmation is relevant to materials planning: - Determines whether or not the information from this confirmation category is to be taken into account by materials planning and control.
Examples: - If you mark inbound deliveries as MRP-relevant, but not loading confirmations, quantities and dates from the former will be taken into account in the materials planning process, whereas the latter will only serve as information for the purchasing department.
In Short, you can see the Inbound Delivery No in MD04 screen if it is marked as MRP relevant.
This can be configured in SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Confirmations > Set Up Confirmation Control, here select the confirmation control key and double click on "Confirmation sequence" in dialog structure and activate indicator "MRP-relevant"

Line item Ship-to Info is not the same in Header Ship-to Party During Sales Order Creation via IDOC

We have observed that during creation of sales order using idoc, the line item ship-to party is not the same with header ship-to. The ship-to party info in line item is equivalent to the header's sold to party. To give you a quick background, Sold to party info is given in idoc and ship to party is being determined using table EDPAR. In this specific scenario, sold to customer is not the same with ship to customer.
Initial checking on the code leads us in function module VIEW_KUAGV. This FM populates partner details of sales order header and line item in program LVEDAF1Z
Below is the code for Sales order Header. Notice that WE_INPUT parameter which contains Ship to party is passed as exporting parameter in FM VIEW_KUAGV. This is the reason why Ship to Party is populated correctly in sales order header but not in sales order item.
Initially, it first set to Sold-To Party. However, if WE_INPUT is given or provided, partner details is set to Ship-To Party.
Please advise on how we can make the ship to party info in header and line item be consistent. This is SAP Standard program which why we are hesitant to make change on the program. If there is a configuration to make this happen, kindly advise.
Regards,
Rommel

Hi Jayesh,
If I understand you correctly, you want that when creating SO from Quoatation
the Ship to Party also follow/copy Ship to Party from Quotation, right?
Just to confirm with you, when you creating SO reference from Quotation, you
use copy/follow-up function, am I right?
You can do this by setting in configuration of Copy Control (like mentioned by Hui).
Step as follow :
1. Go to IMG->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for
    Business Transactions
2. Create your BAdi (Business Add-In for Copying Control), such as get Ship to
    Party value from source document and use it in current document
3. Use this Rule you have created in BAdi (no. 2), in copy control transaction type
    IMG->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for
    Business Transactions-> Define Copying Control for Transaction Types
4. Here you set Copying Routine for your transaction types (put name of your Badi
    created in step no. 2)
Or alternatively, you can set it on access sequence in Partner Function
Ship to Party in configuration. You can define access sequence the Ship
to Party is taken from Preceeding Document -> Ship To Party
1. Go to Partner Function access sequence :
    IMG->CRM->Basic Functions->Partner Processing->Define Access Sequence
2. Create new access sequence with following entry :
    - Source COM_PARTNER_A (PrecedingPartner)
    - Check Mapping for Partner Being search
    - Partner Function in Source = Ship To Party
3. Assign this Access Sequence in you Partner Function used in Sales Order Transaction
   Type.
Tell me if this is what you looking for
Gun.

In vendor line item not showing withholding tax amount and withholding base

Hi Gurus,
When i am using T,code FBL1n for details clear item,in line item doesn't showing withholding tax amount and withholding base amount for some vendors when i am using FB03 there showing tax amount and base amount,in option is there.plz help me,its very urgent.
Thanks & regards,
Dharma.

Im not sure but may be its because in the config. of 1099 Withholding tax we usually say that the with holding is to be posted only after payment of the open items.
So, lets try this. Look at if the documents which are showing withhld tax in FBL1N if they are paid or not.
this would give us some help or hopefully the answer..
regards

Config - Line Item Sequence

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for