Confirmation is not happening for PO

hi,
we are using extended classic scenario.
when i am trying to perform confirmation for PO.it is showing the same screen and i am unable to perform it.Invoice is already done for It.
kindly guide me in this
regards
subhash

Hi
Pl. check if there is any confirmation already against the PO. Also, execute report CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and again try creating confirmation.
Regards,
Sanjeev

Similar Messages

  • Some times firefox does not opens facebook and google pages and this does not happen for other sites. Iam Currently using windows xp and using 3.6.3 Firefox version.Please help.

    Some times the fire fox does not open google and facebook pages but it does not happen for other sites. Iam currently using Windows xp and iam using Mozilla Fire fox 3.6.3 .Please help
    == URL of affected sites ==
    http://www.facebook.com,www.google.com

    You can try a direct connection and select No Proxy in the connection settings.
    You can find the connection settings in "Tools > Options > Advanced : Network : Connection"
    Also do a malware check with a few malware scan programs.<br />
    You need to use all programs because each detects different malware.<br />
    Make sure that you update each program to get the latest version of the database before doing a scan.
    * http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php - Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware
    * http://www.superantispyware.com/ - SuperAntispyware
    * http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html - Spybot Search & Destroy
    * http://www.lavasoft.com/products/ad_aware_free.php - Ad-Aware Free
    * http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/defender/default.mspx - Windows Defender: Home Page
    See also "Spyware on Windows": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Popups_not_blocked and [[Searches are redirected to another site]]

  • Automatic Batch Determination is not happening for New Sales Order Type

    Dear Experts,
      I have created a new sales order type ZBPY - For Free Sales, but automatic batch detrmination and batch pick up is not happening for new sales order type,  but it is activated for all the other sales order types in Production Server, can any body let me know the steps how to map this new order type to batch management and let it behave like other order types.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Saravanan(EKS).

    Hi Saravanan,
    Kindly check the following steps for automatic batch determination.
    1. First check the material is maintained with batch in the warehouse management.
    2. Maintain new entry for search procedure for batch determination with the new created doc type.
    3. Maintain new entry for automatic batch determination for sales order or automatic batch determination for delivery ( This depends on the business process of our client, whether they want to determine the batch with sales order or at the delivery level. check this and make new entry)
    4. Create Batch using T.code MSC1N with proper date of manuf. and SLED.
    5. Create Batch Search Strategy using T.code VCH1 with proper strategy type.
    6. Maintain stock with active batch. check this with t.code LS26 or LS24.
    regards
    Ravishankar M

  • Confirmed qty not displaying for main Item.

    Dear Gurus
    We have an Issue with Confirmed quantity for parent material
    Material Determination is active- The Alternative material is confirmed in 2 different schedules and got delivered accordingly (228units and 204units).
    Here we could find the same is not reflected for parent item- We find only one Confirmed quantity gets displayed. Only First confirmed schedule qty is shown in schedule line.
    Could you please suggest why is it so and method to reftify it.
    Regards
    Kiran

    Hi
    This happens whenever there is a delivery block set in the sales order due to credit limit check and the customer fails the credit check (excedes the credit limit set in FD31).
    However, this can be removed by going to OVZ7 and removing the tick against 'conf block' set for delv block - 01.
    Regards
    Madhu

  • Balance carry forward not happening for new entity

    Hello Gurus,
    We added mid 2009 a new entity to be consolidated.
    The balance carry forward assigns the last year results to retained earnings, this is the same accross all entities.
    When executing the task in the monitor, there is no error message but it does no work, results end-up on a difference elimination item.
    For all other entities, it works fine.
    I wonder if there is a configuration that I overlooked.
    Many thanks for you inpput.
    Alex-

    So you are saying that for all other consolidation units, the Balance CarryForward (BCF) was successful?
    but for only one unit is was not successful?
    - I suggest to you that one of the following has occurred;
    1. there is no data against the balance sheet items for that unit (go to totals records to confirm YTD balance last year for all Balance Sheet items for that cons unit)
    2. there is only data against a specific item that has been set to carryforward to the "elimination" item that you mentioned (check the BCF items to be carried forward confgiuration)
    3. there is only data against Balance Sheet items that have been configured NOT to be carried forward (check the BCF config)
    4. you have configured some items incorrectly as Item Type; Income Statement or Statistical instead of Balance Sheet.
    5. You have missed the consolidation unit from the hierarchy for p1, 2010 (please also check the combinations if it is a matrix consolidation unit) so the BCF is not running for that unit at all
    Checking these 5 should get you closer to the answer

  • Exchange Rate calculation not happening for Special GL in FAGL FC_VAL

    HI ,
    Exhcange rate calculation for all reconciliation accoout going on but for specilal gl not happens.
    Could you please tell  me whether system calculates or not for special gl or calculates only reconciliation account in FAGL_FC_VAL

    Its going well

  • AD SSO not happening for Remote Users

    Dear Members
    I am having an issue with the NAC Deployment for Remote users (Users behind WAN Router)
    Windows AD SSO (2008) is happening for LAN users successfullly, however remote users
    are not able to do AD SSO.
    it is ensured that remote users even in unauthenticated state can reach Active directory. there is no filtering
    on any of the device across the path, for this communication.
    When i use Kerbtray on the remote PC, i found no tickets at all.(i am logged in thru Domain)
    what could be going wrong, is it delay (as they are wan user) which might attribute this issue, and if so, where are the needed parameters that can be tuned for AD SSO to happen.
    Any help will ne highly appreciated.
    thanks
    Ahad

    Hi Ahad,
    As long as ALL the policies in Table 8-1 are configured for the Unauthenticated Role
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/nac/appliance/configuration_guide/48/cas/s_adsso.html#wp1174219
    the CAS should be out of the picture for what concerns the communication between the PC and Kerberos.
    If the Kerbtray.exe output for a failing user is empty, it means that the unsuccessful users do not have any Service Ticket (ST) at all.
    This points to an issue with AD (considering the fact that the CAS is already allowing all the traffic to/from AD).
    The failing users are either unable to send the Ticket-Granting Ticket (TGT) to AD, or they are unable to obtain the Service Ticket (ST) from AD.
    The CAS during this phase is neither performing any actions nor blocking any traffic, since all the communications to/from AD are already fully open in the unauthenticated role.
    Regards,
    Fede
    If  this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as  "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.

  • Archive is not happening for Sales Order

    Hello Friends,
    I want to archive sales order but it is not happening.
    Following is scenario.
    I have completed sales order cycle till amount posting
    va01-vl01n-PGI-vf01-f-28
    and document flow has shown it is done but still when i am running report S3VBAKPTS it shows document can not be archived billing document is not complete.
    Help me for the same
    Regards
    BHavesh

    Hi,
    once the subsequenat document created for a sales order, you cannot archive that sales order.
    reagrds,
    Sumith

  • Reg:Confirmation should not happen without issuing goods.

    Hi Friends.
    We have an issue regarding goods movement.
    I need to know, is there any setting can be made for the below issue.
    1. how to make settings that confirmation of production order or any goods movement( Of finished good) , should not be done untill and unless goods issue has been done for the order,.
    EX: After releasing the order , we have to issue goods for productionn. then only we can do confirmation.
    But we are facing the issue that without issuing the goods also, we are able to confirm. so i need to stop the confirmation or any goods movement which will happen without issuing the goods,,
    Waiting for your positive answers,,thank u in advace.

    Dear
    You can try the following user exit in your case : Enhancement - MBCF0002 /FM - EXIT_SAPMM07M_001/Include - ZXMBCU02
    Or T.code OPK4. Set termination of Order confirmation in case of wrong Goods movement.
    - Use User Status .T.code is BS02.
    Refer : GR restrict before Confirmation & Confirmation restrict before GI
    Regards
    JH

  • Proper stock transfering not happening for intercompany

    Hi Friends,
    When I executed the scenario of procure to pay using replenishment for intercompany am getting the proper result step by step in IDES for standard document type (NB for PO).
    Now I have created my own document type for PO and have assigned it to sites and sales area.
    With standard document type (NB PO)
    After executing replenishmenmt run I am getting standard PO type (NB) say xxxxxxxxx.
    Now I created outbound delivery-->then picking and PGI. Now my stock is got reduced from supplying DC (say by 5 nos) and this stock is now under transit (can check thru MB5T). and total stock is also decreased by 5 nos.
    Now to move this stock to receiving store I did GR against delivery and now after this stock in store is increased by 5 nos and hence total stock is also increased by 5 nos.
    Now after checking MB5T i found there is no stock in transit.
    Now I have tested this scenario for my own document type (say std PO type A)
    Now std PO type A is successfully generated after executing replenishment run thru WRP1.
    Now I created delivery then picking then PGI. Now I checked and found that stock from supplying DC is decreased by (say 5 nos) and stock in receiving store is increased by 5 nos in one shot  and I could not find any stock in transit since its happening in one shot .
    Now I need ur inputs if i am missing something becoz it shud happen in two parts first after doing PGI stock shud decrease from supplying DC (say for 5 nos)and that  stock shud come under stock under transit (can check in MB5t) and that stock from transit shud go to receiving store once i will do GR against delivery.
    Any pointers.
    Regards
    Ashutosh

    Hi,
    It seems that for your Site for the stock transfer order the "One-step Stock transfer" is ACTIVE. kindly remove the same and u will have the desired result.
    Jonk

  • PO Partial confirmation Quantity not updated for non-catalog items in SRM

    Hi Experts,
    Partial Confirmation plus Partial Rejection from Ariba(Suppliers network) could not be processed.
    Steps to Reproduce:
    1) Create a purchase order.
    2) Confirm some part of the quauntity and reject the balance part in Ariba.
    3) Open the link in SRM and click Copy push button.
    4) Click on Process PO and check PO, the PO is not updated with the changes done in Ariba
    Expected Result:
    PO should update the changes done in Ariba.
    Here when part quantity is confirmed and part is rejected at Ariba, its sending a POR but SRM is not updating anything for non-catalog items when POR is copied onto PO.But where as  in the Catalog items partially confirmed POR is copied onto PO.
    kindly give your valuable inputs to poceed furthur.
    Regards,
    Chandu

    Hi,
    I'm not clear you issue. Is it SC -> PR(backend) -> PO(backend) classic scenario ? or You just created a PO in backend system?
    BBP_GET_STATUS_2 will update SC follow-on doc information from backend.
    Regards,
    Masa

  • Confirmation is not happening

    Hello Guru's,
    The problem is like this.
    1) i have created the production order through co01.
    2)done the goods issue through mb1a.
    3)While confirmation it is showing a error that Goods movement not possible with mvmt type 261.
    Pls sort it out.
    vish

    Hi
    1. do you have a backflush indicator for the components?
    or
    2. the goods movment  - all components tick in confirmation parameters opk4 is ticked.
    any one might be the reason for the above mentioned error
    Regards
    Chandra

  • Collection not happening for "missed cycles"

    I'd seen a post back in Jan 5, 2008 by "WoofaJB" regarind the collection
    cycle.
    To quote: "When the Client connects to its assigned Collection Server
    (set in a reg entry) it checks in. The server then works out if the
    machine has completed a scan during that collection cycle (made up of
    start date/time and duration) and if not then the server queues it up
    for a scan. If the server is bus it may not send a scan command for a
    while."
    Well, that doesn't seem to be happening.
    Collection is set By Week
    Start Time of 1/1/2000 (currently end date shows 8/28/08)
    Every 1 week on Thursday
    Duration:
    Scan for 1 Days
    machine was last scanned on 7/18/08
    But it's been powered on many times since then, just not on Thursdays.

    If collection is done weekly, on Thursdays, and the duration is set to one day max, and if that workstation isn't powered up on Thursdays, then it will not be scanned. The workstation must connect to, and register with, a Collection Server during the scan duration to be queued for a scan. The Collection Server doesn't track down each workstation to see how long it's been since the last scan; it trusts that you're serious about the scan duration and won't perform scheduled scans outside that duration "slot".
    To get that workstation to scan, you'll need to either ensure that it's connected on Thursdays or broaden the scan duration to include a time when that workstation actually is powered up.
    -- Tim --
    Originally Posted by KittyNoLegs
    I'd seen a post back in Jan 5, 2008 by "WoofaJB" regarind the collection
    cycle.
    To quote: "When the Client connects to its assigned Collection Server
    (set in a reg entry) it checks in. The server then works out if the
    machine has completed a scan during that collection cycle (made up of
    start date/time and duration) and if not then the server queues it up
    for a scan. If the server is bus it may not send a scan command for a
    while."
    Well, that doesn't seem to be happening.
    Collection is set By Week
    Start Time of 1/1/2000 (currently end date shows 8/28/08)
    Every 1 week on Thursday
    Duration:
    Scan for 1 Days
    machine was last scanned on 7/18/08
    But it's been powered on many times since then, just not on Thursdays.

  • Challan mapping not happening for employees belonging to certain per. area

    Hi,
    we are facing a problem with challan mapping for employees belonging to certain personnel areas.
    For other it is happening correctly.
    Any suggestion for the above issue?
    thanks,
    Ayyaps

    Hi,
    Check the feature 40ECC for the Personnel Areas for which challan mapping is not being done. The TAN returned through this feature should be same as the one used in the second screen of challan mapping. If both the TAN matches, then only you will be able to map challan with the employees.
    VK

  • BP replication not happening for a particular sales area.

    The BP's created for one particular sales area are not getting replicated into CRM, though before sometime it was happening.
    The BP with the "general data", and "role of sold to party" only flows but not with the sales area. There is no BDoc error in the SMW01 either. While displaying BP for the role of sold to party, it shows "Sold-to-party(maintained)" but the sales area entries though maintained for this sales area in the ECC, do not flow to the CRM.
    However for other sales areas it flows.
    Where should I look to resolve this situation. All entries in PPOMA etc are rightly made and untouched.
    Thanks and regards,
    Tariq

    Hi
    The BP's created for one particular sales area are not getting replicated into CRM, though before sometime it was happening.
    DJ>>  Hope the required sales area is available in CRM.
    The BP with the "general data", and "role of sold to party" only flows but not with the sales area. There is no BDoc error in the SMW01 either. While displaying BP for the role of sold to party, it shows "Sold-to-party(maintained)" but the sales area entries though maintained for this sales area in the ECC, do not flow to the CRM.
    DJ>> Please check the following -
    1. Create a BP in CRM (with the sold-to party role) with the required Sales area and see if this customer when replicated to ECC has the relevant Sales Area.  Ideally it should get replicated if all you middleware settings are fine.
    2. See you have not set a filter for a specific Sales Area and becuase of that BP is getting replicate but not the sales area.
    Hope this will help
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for

  • IPod Mini Freezes Up

    I have the 1st generation mini and on a couple of occasions it will freeze up..it's usually on a song, or in the "Play list", etc. when it happens. In the past I have had to wait until it went dead, then when I plugged it into either the computer or

  • Warning messages are not displayed in confirmation

    Hi, We are working with SRM 5.0 classic scenario. Our issue is warning messages are not displayed whenever we press the CONFIRM or DELETE button in the confirmation, however warning messages are displayed if we press CHECK button in the confirmation.

  • Trying to upload pictures from and iPad on to a pdf form (Adobe FormsCentral)

    Im trying to upload pics from my iPad onto an pdf form also on my iPad. Is there a special code that I need?

  • OCCURS clause

    WE know that the OCCURS clause in the internal table statement  creates the internal <b>table object</b> In the following statement is this possible:- TYPES <mt> TYPE| LIKE <linetype> OCCURS<n> . If not what else?

  • Installing Oracle Developer Suite Error

    HI I am a first time user of Oracle, I have installed the Oracle Database Server and Client 9.2.0.1.0 and now i am trying to install Oracle Developer Suite but I get an error saying Oracel9iAS cannot be installed into an existing Oracle9i 9.2.0.1.0 o