Consignment settlement - payment terms

Hello,
I had a vendor that use to buy consignment and non-consignment part. Both consignment and non-consignment they have different payment terms. I found out that when we do consignment settlement the payment term is retrieved from vendor master. i try not to set payment terms manually everytime create a PO for non-consignment part. Is there any methods that we can use?
Thanks.

Dear Janice,
Maybe you can try to activate " Sub range" function in vendor master, with this sub range you can specify various Purchasing data for various plant.
Activate the sub range funtion in Tcode OMSG
Regards,
w1n

Similar Messages

Consignment and payment terms

All,
I understand that during MRKO (the consignment settlement) the payment terms is pulled from the vendor master at the company code level. This is SAP standard.
Is anyone aware of anything in SAP that could change that default? For example during the MRKO settlement the payment terms would be pulled from the vendor master purchasing org level OR from the info record?
Regards,
Sandra

Hi
we can maintain payment terms in Inforecord in condition tab.
Raju

Vendor payment terms & consignment

I have a question on how we can handle differet default payment terms for vendor consignment vs. other purchasing.
For example, we might pay our vendor at Net 60 for all normal purchasing but Net 10 for consignment. The vendor master payment terms (LFM1-ZTERM) are therefore Net 60. We have a PA with this vendor for the consignment goods which indicates Net 10, but since goods are moved from consignment to unrestricted (MB1B - 411K) against the vendor only and not the PA, it uses the Net 60 terms for the line items. AP is forced to manually change the terms on all line items. I do not want to change the default terms in the vendor master to Net 10; they need to remain as Net 60.
Any suggestions on this?

Hi,
Check on it:-
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=323186
consignment and payment terms
pherasath

Payment Term/BP on the level of Charge type in FWO

According to business process I have 2 variants of payment term for transportation with payer:
1)      Prepaid (paid by Agency1(Payer1) in POL port of Loading)
2)      Collect (paid by Agency2(Payer2) in POD port of discharge)
3)      Today customer has a requirement to issue several settlements from one FWO to different business partners on the level of charge type.
Example:
BP Role: Payer
BP : Payer 1
Payment term: will pay with term prepaid:
Charge type1 - NTFR (Net Ocean Freight)
Charge type2 - BAF (Bunker Adjustment Factor)
BP Role: Payer
BP : Payer 2
Payment term: will pay with term collect:
Charge type3 - DTHC
The problem is how to combine several terms(prepaid/collect/direct) with several BP Roles(Payer)/BP(Payer1/Payer2)on the level of charge type(service) in FWO.
From the fisrt sight this case could be some way covered by standard on 9.1 functionality of «Charge type activation based on incoterm».
But at the same time we some issues with this standard solution, because we need to split payer and term not only for the whole stage, but also for different charges in one stage. An example of this could be port to port transportation without any pre-carriage or on-carriage, but with OTHC/DTHC that could be paid in any term(P/C) separately by the appropriate agent in POL or POD. At the same time all the transportation costs will be associated only with one stage of transportation.
Do anybody has an idea how to split payment term deeper than level of stage?

Hi,
You can use the "Flexible Settlement" function in TM9.1.
Assign the charge types to settlement group.
Assign the settlement group to settlement rule.
Assign the settlement rule to settlement profile.
Best Regards
Clark Huang

Payment terms in Rebates

Hi
Can any body tell what is the use of the Payment tems in Rebates partial settlement screen?
I have a requirement, to pay the customers Cash discount (quantity base) based on the payment terms.
Ex. If customer buys 100 Qty @ Rs 100 his total invoice amount will be 10,000.
my requirement is if he pays 10000 with in 15 days ill give Rs 2 per qty = Rs. 200
If he pays between 16 to 30 days discount will be Re. 1 per qty = Rs. 100
Note that we cant maintain quantity base in FI payment terms, there only possible to maintain days and percentage.

Hi Sridhar,
it would be helpful if you could share with us as how you did?.
Regards,
Siva

Payment terms for Advances in Sales & Distribution

Hi friends !!
1)You may know that we have payment terms like eg: 30% advance and remaining payment after delivery.
In such scenario, while doing sales order itself the customer need to pay the advance. Then he needs acknowledgement or bill for that amount. How and where we will configure that???
2)If the advance amount recieved at sales order level do we need to issue the invoice for the full amount or for the balance amount??
Please any one help me to understand the logic !!
Thanks & Regards,
Sreedhar.
Email: [email protected]

hi,
If it is real-estate based one plz follow the following procedurs:
You have to define conditions for sales-based rent in order to be able to post sales-based rent. Also, if advance payments were made for sales-based rent or a minimum sales-based rent is defined, conditions allow you to offset these against the sales-based rent to be paid.
Prerequisites
You defined the necessary condition types in Customizing and assigned them attributes for sales-based rent. In Customizing choose:
SAP Customizing Implementation Guide - Flexible Real Estate Management - Conditions and Flows - Condition Types
You set the Relevant to Sales indicator on the General Data tab page in the real estate contract.
Procedure
       1.      On the Conditions tab page, assign the necessary conditions to the contract. The following condition types are relevant for sales-based rent settlement:
·        Advance Payment for Sales-Based Rent
One-time or recurring condition for sales-based rent; requires actual rent as condition purpose. Advance payments made by the tenant are offset against the sales-based rent resulting from the sales-based rent agreement.
·        Minimum Rent
Minimum amount of sales-based rent to be paid. This is usually a condition with the condition purpose actual rent, but can also be used as a statistical condition.
·        Maximum Rent
Maximum amount of sales-based rent to be paid (cap). Maximum rent is usually represented by one or more statistical conditions. The maximum amount is the sum of the conditions, limited to the given settlement period.
·        Sales-Based Rent (Required for Every Sales Rule)
This condition defines how the receivable or credit memo is posted. It is not possible to assign a unit price to this condition, since the posting amount is determined by the sales-based rent settlement. The calculation formula always has to be sales-based rent (see: Customizing settings). The system generates a cash flow item for the posting that reflects the posting period and settlement period. For this reason, you do not enter a frequency for this condition. Instead, it is defined as a one-time condition.
The Sales-Based Rent condition is also used to specify which objects of the sales-based rent agreement form the basis for sales-based rent. This makes it possible to determine sales-based rent using measurements as a basis (for example, per square foot of retail space). If the condition has a distribution rule, then sales are distributed to the objects using this rule.
Note that the system uses only the last distribution formula in the settlement period. The system does not distribute proportionally within the settlement period if there is a change to the distribution formula.
       2.      On the Terms subtab, assign the same sales rule to all advance payment conditions for sales-based rent, to all minimum sales-based rent conditions, and to just one Sales-Based Rent condition.
You have to assign a single Sales-Based Rent condition to each sales rule.
If a contract contains more than one sales rule, you have to assign that number of Sales-Based Rent conditions in order to be able to perform settlement. You cannot use advance payments or minimum sales-based rent conditions for settlement. You can assign a sales rule to from zero to any number of advance payments and to from zero to any number of minimum sales-based rent conditions.
regards,
Siddharh.

Issue related to Payment Terms.

Dear Gurus,
The requirement is: We use payment terms as 3% discount if the customer pays the due in 7 days.
How can system calculates the 3% discount If the customer pays the due within 7 days. Because in the conditions the price is credit price. So how the discount 3% will be caculated in the system.
Thanks & Regards,
Sreehari
Edited by: Sreehari Kondapalli on Feb 10, 2008 11:07 AM

you do assign payment terms in customer master and it automatically copied in to sales order. After billing if the customer paid the amount with in 7 days then it automatically calculates the discount while entering the incoming payments of customer in F-28 fi people get the information and they settle the account according to payment terms
While defining payment terms u give the date should be document data or posting date etc according to that system will pick the discount to be given and calculates the date
reward points if it helps

Payment Terms no working

Hi Friends
I have a vendor 5025786 for co.code 1200, who has consignment documents as well as IR's posted through MIRO. The payment terms on the master record is NT30, but when the consignment documents get posted to the vendor's account it does not have the payment terms, instead it just shows 0 days eg. document 3700102698, 3700099858 co.code 1200. Well those posted through MIRO have the 30 days payment terms. I would like to know as to why the payment term field on the consignment IR's is blank instead of 30 days. As a result now the consignment documents for this vendors get paid immediately
Thanks in Advance

Dear ,
please check the Master data u maintain the Payment terms in both places 1) Fi co code data
2) purchase org. data. if the entry is coming from MM system is picking the payment terms from purchase org. and if u r entery is related to financial system is picking the payment terms from co. code data.
Regards
radha

Payment terms & Down payments

Hi all SAP experts,
In my company the requirement is as follows:
1. When the order confirmation is done (sales order created), 50% of the order value is to be billed to the customer as first down payment.
2. After the delivery of the items is done, 40% of the order value is to be billed to the customer.
3. After the installation & commissioning is done, the remaining 10% of the value is to be billed to the customer.
Requirements:
1. How do I map this scenario in standard SAP?
2. Can I use the payment terms to control the part payments to be received.
3. My client wants to know at any stage, the amount received from the customer for the sales order & the remaining amount to be received from the customer.
Please help me to map this scenario.
With best regards,
Niyaz.

hello, niyaz.
i was able to test your requirements on 11 oct 2008. here were my findings:
1. your requirement for 50%, 40% and 10% payments can be satisfied by using BILLING PLAN and using MILESTONE BILLING, which you must activate on sales doc header and item levels. you can specify that the first payment is a down-payment (which is not included in the 100% collectible, and you must settle the downpayment... more on this later).
the 40% after delivery is also confirmed in the sales order (billing by default will be order related as SAP standard). the 10% will follow the same logic.
2. you can use different payment terms for each of the payments (50%, 40% and 10%). but these will be at header level, as the payment terms at item level are not modifiable (unless someone can find out how). i tried deactivating 'business item' at VOV7 but you cannot do this if you are using billing plans.
3. your client's remaining requirements can be tracked by the document flow at header level, and by using the reports in FI and Credit Management.
hope these helped you.
regards.
Edited by: jonathan yap on Oct 11, 2008 12:51 PM

MRKO Consignment settlement against a PI partner

Hi
I have a problem with the vendor the MRKO settles against. The scenario is that I want to settle the against a PI maintained in the vendor master (in the partner function) which is different to the VN that the MRKO run settles against because this is the vendor the info record is created for and the PO was created against.
Please help
Shashi

Check the OSS note 451370
The consignment settlement does not take partner function 'Invoice presented by' possibly stored in the vendor master into account but instead always creates the consignment invoice with reference to the vendor of the consignment goods.This vendor must be created in the relevant company code and purchasing organization.
Other terms
RMVKON00
Reason and Prerequisites
For the following reasons, the consignment settlement is unable to take partner role 'Invoicing party presented by' stored in the vendor master into account and can only create the invoice for the goods supplier:
1. Normally, the consignment liability account is managed as a current account.The posting period and the vendor number are usually the sort and assignment criterion of the items on the account.Only by using this sort/assignment criteria can you determine from an FI point of view which consignment liabilities are created in a certain posting period for a certain vendor, and to what extent these were cleared by an invoice.
2. The inventory management of the consignment stock is always executed for the goods supplier and the goods movements are always executed with reference to this vendor accordingly.The resulting posting of the consignment liability is therefore executed with the number of this vendor as part of the sort/assignment criterion.
3. If the settlement of the consignment withdrawals does not then work with this vendor but instead works with the invoicing party assigned to this vendor, this would cause the posting on the consignment liability account to contain the vendor number of the invoicing party as a sort and assignment criterion, as the document only contains this vendor. Therefore, the postings could no longer be cleared and the documents could no longer be archived.It would also no longer be possible to execute evaluations via the consignment liability account for the determination of open items.
For the above reasons, in consignment processing, you can only work with the goods supplier which must be created in the corresponding company code and the corresponding purchasing organization.

Blocking a Sales order with Payment Terms

Hi all
We have a payment terms : Advanced Payment required .
I want to block all Sales Order created with this Payment to immediately be blocked and
will require a CRedit Block release to proceed to creating delivery.
Please can you advise which options in CRedit Management will be suitable to enable this.
Thanks in Advance will reward points.
Regards
KC

Hi kasavan
As you need advance payments , if you do the given configuration your sales order gets blocked at billing (VF01 )for different dates created in sales order.
say for example you have given 3 dates at item level and all 3dates gets blocked at the time of billing.you need to release then create billing for that particular dates.
make the following necessary configurations
item category group - 0005
item category - TAO
for this TAO item category a billing plan 01 (milestone billing plan -01) will be assigned and its billing relevance should be I which is order related billing .
billing doc type - FAZ
cancellation billing doc type - FAS
maintain a condition type AZWR which is down payment settlement , it has requirement as 2 and Alt calc type as 48 acct key as ERL
Now when you enter a material in line item 10 and go to item data , you can see the billing plan tab.
now go to billing plan tab and enter the start date and enter the dates on which billing has to be done and then in billing request enter 0009 which is for down payment.once u press enter automatically it all the dates get blocked and billing request by default you get as 1 , that you change it to 4 or 5 . 4 is for down payment at value basis and 5 is for down payment at percentage basis. and beside that there will be a billing type .assign billing doc type as FAZ. to all dates
check the copying requirements are there at VTFA as 20 and for item category TAO copying requirements 23 is maintained or not
now do the cycle OR - LF - FAZ (billing doc type)
Reward if useful
Regards
Srinath

Payment Terms configuration

Dear Friends,
I have 2 queries -
1. Can we configured the Payment Terms which will enable while invoicing to create the multiple line item while Invoice Posting ( accounting entry ) say, while doing MIRO / FB60 transaction. And one of those would go to Special GL. e.g. we have to deduct the Retention Money @ 5% from Invoice Amount and we are using one of Special GL for Retention money so can i configure the Payment Term as -
1. 95% -
60 Days
2. 5% -
365 Days
So here 2 ( 5% ) will be posted as Special GL item while Invoice Entry.
( Currently we are transferring those entries to special gl manually using T code - F-02 from Vendor Open items )
2. We have configured the number of Payment Terms but sometimes negotiated Terms does fall into the category of existing Payment Terms and it is not possible to create the Payment Terms for such requirement. So can we configure one Payment Term which will be editable while Purchase ORder Creation or Invoicing ( like payment term with "OTHERS" would be created and initially it would be configured for 0 Days and those would be edited while making Purchase Order as per requirement.
Since this is affecting our Ageing Analysis and Payment Due Report as both are based on Payment Terms in PO.
If anyone has solution pls suggest the way to do it . will assign full marks if gets solution.
Thanks in advance.
PS

Hi
I think we can't maintain cash discounts more than two %.
Goto OBB8, choose account type customer/vendor.
goto payment terms segment. 1) 3% days 0 2) 2% days 15.
3) we can enter %, only days. it means no cash discount.
Regards,
Chandra

Getting split payment terms in case of customer credit memo(Doc type DG)

Hi Guys,
Is there any FM available for getting split payment terms in case of customer credit memo(Document type DG). There will be no invoice/billing doc for this document type and will be created from FB75 transaction. For billing document i am using FM SD_PRINT_TERMS_OF_PAYMENT_SPLI. Please let me know if there is any FM for accounting document also.
Thanks,
Vinod.

Hi,
Try this bapi
BAPI_AR_ACC_GETSTATEMENT

The payment terms are not getting reflected in PO

Hi,
We are in SRM5.0 Extended Classic scenario.
We have created new payment term in ECC and transferred to SRM using BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS and after tranferring it to SRM I am able to see the new payment term in table BBP_PAYTERM and BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT in SRM system.
But non of the payment terms are not reflecting into PO. We are not getting any errors while processing the PO.
Could you please suggest what may be the issue here.
Best Regards,
Siddappa

Hello Siddappa,
I am a little confused here with the scenario.
I understand that the payment terms are recenly created and replicated. So naturally they would have been updated in the relevant vendor master as well. Now has the vendor master been replicated to SRM from ECC once the payment terms were updated.
So from what you have mentioned "When we check the BBP_PD, the payment term is reflecting for the POs created after shopping cart approval."
So does this mean once the SC is approved then the PO is created and then the Terms of Payment are seen in the PO.
However "If the PO created through describe requirement, the Vendor will not assigned the PO created will go to Held status and buyer will process the order."
So does this mean since the Vendor is not mentioned the Terms of Payment is not being reflected and will happen only once the same is specified in the PO.
I have a question on whether after replicating the Payment Terms, has it been seen in any of the PO's created so far or it is always blank.
Regards
Pramod

How to get vendor payment terms

Hi all,
I am creating a report. I need to get vendor payment terms. There are invoices without PO, how can I retrieve the payment terms for those cases.
Thanks.

Hi nene
in case of invoice without PO, The payment term will be selected from the vendor master data (in View : payment terms transaction in XK03).
Check payment term in master data is exist or not.
the data is in the table LFB1 : Field ZTERM
Regards
Wiboon

Consignment settlement - payment terms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for