CoProducts Settlement rule Deletion

Which Bussiness Transaction can set the SETC Status of Process order with settlement rule for co-product to inactive?

Hi
To inactive settlement rule for Co-Products delete the structure assigned in the Joint Production tab of MRP-II view and save. Now if u create a Process order then system will ask u for the settlement rule to enter manually. The system status at that point show
SETC Settlement rule created
SETM Settlemt rule created manaully
Regards
Brahmaji

Similar Messages

Mass deletion of settlement rules for few WBS- Codes

HI All,
I just want to know that is there any possible way to delete settlement rule in mass.
We use to upload the settlement rule data through LSMW program for all the project codes.By mistake the user has excuted twicw the LSMW program and now instead od having one settlement rule now they have two settlement rule assigned to the project code. thats is the second rule is duplicated.
now the user wnats to delete those second settlement rule which got duplicated for all the WBS codes. nearly there will be 6000 records are there which got affected by this.
No entries has been posted to those WBS codes till now.
Kindly any one suugest me how to proceed further to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Joby

Hi,
In customization, use the strategy with "No Receiver" and then use transaction CJB1/ CJB2 to automatically generate the revise settlement rules without receiver.
Regards,
Gaurav

Delet the settlement rule

hi
How to delet the settlement rule , after realease project.
if i check in settlement rule for Activity it will show all option in disply mode .
thanks
sunil

Has settlement from the Network Activity already ran?
On the settlement rule line ....check the values in the First Used & Last Used fields
If both of these are not blank, then settlement has already ran.
To delete you would need to undo each run of settlement to remove the date.
If in Production this is probably not an option. Therefore you will need to end the existing settlement rule with an end date in end period & year.
Then create new settlement rule.
If both First Used and Last used are blank then I would try entering /SU53 into the command field to check for missing authorisations.
I am automatically generating settlement rules from Activity to parent WBS and have no problem changing or deleting the settlement rule prior to settlement running.
Steve

AUC and settlement rule mismatch.

Hi,
We have created many AUCs while uploading initial data at the time of go-live by posting JVs on WBSE and then performing the settlement. Now due to some currency issues we have reversed all settlements, and then Asset accounting person has resetted the asset register.
now when I am trying to create AUC from CJ20N, system creates AUC and provides the number. but this newly generated AUC number is not matching with the AUC in settlement rule. I can't delete the old settlement rule as the settlement performed on that. as well as I am not able to add new AUC in settlement rule.
Please let me know if there is any program / tcode which can remove this inconsistency. or is there any other procedure to make it streamline.
Please help.
Regards,
Nilesh.

Hi,
There is no error message in this case.
The scenario is like:
I have one WBSE and AUC is created for this WBS. for example AUC number is 1. the WBSE is released and some cost has incurred on it. during periodic settlement the cost is settled on the AUC.
Now the Client FICO team observed that the asset accounting is wrong due to currency conversion problem, so FICO team decided to reset the asset register and upload the entire master with new corrections. this will reset the AUCs as well.
so i reversed the settlement done on AUC and got the cost back on WBSE.
FICO team has resetted the asset register and all AUCs got deleted.
Now the issue is: WBSE is having AUC #1 in settlement rule which can not be deleted as settlement is carried out on this rule.
But when I create new AUC for WBS it is being created as some different number, (lets say #7) so even if now I run settlement the settlement will be done on AUC #1 insted of #7 even though #1 belongs to some other WBSE now in new scenario.
I hope I have clearly mentioned the issue.
Regards,
Nilesh

Error during automatic settlement rule creation

Hi Gurus,
For the investment project, I maintained as follows, first level WBSE - Only planning element - no settlement. 2nd level WBSE - settled to AuCs. For level three & below settled to Superior WBSE. I had created the Settlement type with '5'. When I am executing CJB2 to create the Settlement rules automatically, I am getting the following error message for level 3 & below WBSE.
Enter a valid value for the settlement type :
Message no. KD199
Diagnosis
The system found a settlement type settlement type in the settlement rule which either does not exist or is unsuitable for the sender.
Procedure
If possible, enter a suitable settlement rule. Remember that the rules for preliminary settlement ("PRE") of capital investment measures are different from those for period settlement ("PER") of other settlement senders. Periodic settlement only makes sense for capital investment measures. They must not have any "PER" rules.
To enter an investment profile (in the control data for an order or WBS element) or to remove it. However, first delete the PER or PRE rules (in the settlement rule) and er zu in internal orders, you can first change the investment profile and then adapt the rules before you save.
Error(s) during creation of settlement rule :
Message no. ORB509
Diagnosis
Errors occurred during the check on settlement receivers.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Check whether the:
Specific receiver Account assignment e actually exists
Settlement profile Z7 permits account assignment to the specified receiver
can anyone help me where I am making mistake or what is the procedure to be adopted for such scenario.
somebody else also had discussed the same issue in this forum but there is no answer for this.
thanks in advance
Vinodh

hi Sreenivas,
Thanks for your reply,
I tried this, system is giving the following error now
Could not find a superior WBS element for WBS element
Message no. CJ115
Diagnosis
The system could not find a superior element for a WBS element while it was executing the function 'Derive structure'
System Response
Processing stopped.
What could be the reason ?
thanks in advance,
Vinodh

CProjects to Internal Order - settlement rule

Hi,
Having created an IO from cProjects, I get to see accouting error. Control Cockpit shows "No settlement rule exists for the Order ...".
Going further, this error is coming in the way of the planned costs getting to IO, and subsequently the IO costs coming up in Fin Planning, in RPM.
Please advise on the steps to correct the settlement rule issue. Resolving one issue is likely to solve many of my issues!
Thanks.

Yes. You cannot delete.
If you want to use this new distribution rule from here onwards (means from this period ..) it is possible.
Do the following
1. For old distribution rule (i.e. for old cost center ) change the "valid to period" last month. You can directly change this by clicking the settlement rule in the order master data.
2. For new distribution rule give "valid from period" whatever you want (future periods).
So that you need not delete the old distribution rule.. and from this month onwards your new distribution rule will work.
Radha

Settlement rules not getting created

Hi,
During period end, all 2nd level WBS elements are generally settked to AuCs. I had maintained the settlement strategy in such a way that all the WBS elements below 2nd level are settled to its Superior. When i tested this in one of the Client, it worked fine whereas in the new client, when I execute CJB2, system gives the message "processed with no errors", however when I check the WBS element, settlement rules are not created. What could be the problem ?
thanks in advance.

Hi
A copy of text ( donot know anymore, where I got it):
Only the wbs element with investition profile, which has the 'manage
Auc' (technical field INVMA ), will be excluded. In this situation
the automatisch generation of settlement rules is not useful.
In other case, that the wbs element has a investition profile, but
the investition profile do not has the flag 'manage Auc' ticked, is not
considered as a accompanying measure. In this situation, a autom.
settlment rule generation can be useful, that why the program do not
exclude such wbs elementen.
Please notice, in this issue, only the customizing setting of investiti-
on profile is involved, not the settlement rules.
you can take a small modification, which remove the check of the
'invma' of inves. profile, which is programed purposefully.
include LKSRGF01    form process_block
      general checks
        if not lt_prps-imprf is initial.
          call function 'IM_TAPRF_READ'
               exporting
                    i_ivpro = lt_prps-imprf
               importing
                    e_taprf = ls_taprf.
          if not ls_taprf-invma is initial. "invest object      " delete
            add 1 to stats-sal_0.      "couldn't be handled
            perform wla_confirm_proc_status
                      using p_rsthie_block-name(22)
                            kpepw_objstat-not_relevant
                            space
                            check_messages-off.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo
Edited by: Zhenbo Wang on Jul 13, 2009 5:27 PM

VA02 - maintain settlement rules

Hi folks,
I am trying to maintain a settlement rule within the Sales Order without the user going to the Item Level.
I want to inherit the WBS element from the Header VBAK and on the save of the document automatically create the settlement rule.
I have tried K_SETTLEMENT_RULES* functions and cant seem to get them to work.
Anyone got any ideas or any advice on this ?
Regards
Gary

I managed to work this one out myself, but just in case someone else has to do it. here is how I acheived it.
Firstly set up all fields on COBRA and COBRB, then call FM
             CALL FUNCTION 'K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_FILL'
               TABLES
                 I_COBRA       = lt_cobra
                 I_COBRB       = lt_cobrb.
Next
           For some reason the internal system ALWAYS sets the table
           up as the update status, this causes problems on creation,
           so we have to change to Insert status.
             Assign (c_GT_cobrb) to <fs_cobrb>.
             if <fs_cobrb> is assigned.
               LT_COBRB_BT[] = <fs_cobrb>.
               loop at lt_cobrb_bt.
             Somehow the previous records are being kept in so have to
             delete them or else prog falls over.
               if lt_cobrb_bt-objnr <> lv_objnr.
                 delete lt_cobrb_bt.
               endif.
               check to see if record exists.
                 select count(*)
                 from cobrb
                 where objnr = lt_cobrb_bt-objnr
                 and   bureg = lt_cobrb_bt-bureg
                 and   lfdnr = lt_cobrb_bt-lfdnr.
                 if sy-subrc <> 0.
                 Set the flag to be insert instead of U
                   lt_cobrb_bt-uflag = 'I'.
                   modify lt_cobrb_bt.
                 else.
                 If settlement exists then exit.
                   lv_settl_exist = 1.
                   exit.
                 endif.
               endloop.
              If settlement exists then exit.
                if lv_settl_exist = 1.
                  exit.
                endif.
                <fs_cobrb> = LT_COBRB_BT[] .
             endif.
           For some rreason the internal system ALWAYS sets the table
           up as the update status, this causes problems on creation,
           so we have to change to Insert status.
             Assign (c_GT_cobra) to <fs_cobra>.
             if <fs_cobra> is assigned.
               LT_COBRa_BT[] = <fs_cobra>.
               loop at lt_cobra_bt.
             Somehow the previous records are being kept in so have to
             delete them or else prog falls over.
               if lt_cobra_bt-objnr <> lv_objnr.
                 delete lt_cobra_bt.
               endif.
               check to see if record exists.
                 select count(*)
                 from cobra
                 where objnr = lt_cobra_bt-objnr.
                 if sy-subrc <> 0.
                 Set the flag to be insert instead of U
                   lt_cobra_bt-uflag = 'I'.
                   modify lt_cobra_bt.
                 else.
                 If settlement exists then exit.
                   lv_settl_exist = 1.
                   exit.
                 endif.
               If settlement exists then exit.
                 if lv_settl_exist = 1.
                   exit.
                 endif.
               endloop.
                <fs_cobra> = LT_COBRa_BT[] .
             endif.
Then when the tables have had their update status amended then call FM
             CALL FUNCTION 'K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_SAVE'
               EXPORTING
               DIALOG                  = ' '
                 OBJNR                   = lv_objnr
                I_STATUS_UPDATE         = ' '
              EXCEPTIONS
                NO_RULE_FOR_OBJNR       = 1
                OTHERS                  = 2.

CJ20n (settlement rule)

Dear Experts,
Can any one plz provide solution,
CJ20n (settlement rule)
1 Can we delete all settlement rules in single shot at WBS Element Overview.
Actually by mistake user has marked all billing items, generated settlement rule (CJB2) to all
WBS, now I have to remove for three project many WBS.
I have checked in MASS changesu2026.but I have option for Billingu2026.. no option for remove
settlement rule.
This is my second doubt:
2 How many ways are there to remove BILLING ELEMENT after becoming gray.
Long back i have faced same problem......i have removed manually,its painfull job.
Regards&Thanks
Chandra

Dear Experts,
Thanx for valuables inputs.
Virendra sir,
2 - for billing element - has revenue been posted? else you can delink the sales order run CJEN and then it open again then tick the correct WBS for billing and relink the sales order
DELINK...........It means i have to make partner tab blank...then cjen....is it correct.
I have to remove wbs in saleorder also?
(plz correct me if im wrong)
Thanx Nitin....
Previously i ahve done manually.but its painfull.
I have rewarded points for both
Regards
Chandra

BAPI or FM for settlement rule

Has anybody an idea how to cretate/update/delete the settlement rules of a production order via BAPI or FM?
Thanks
Raadha

Hello Raadha,
You can use the following FM's:-
SETTLEMENT_RULE_CREATE_OPR
CO_SD_SETTLEMENT_RULES_UPDATE
CK02_CO_PROD_GEN_SETTLE_RULE
Hope thsi answers your question.
Thanks,
Greetson

Settlement rule copied from reference internal order

Hi
How to manage that no settlemnt rule will be copied from reference order into the new internal order I´m creating in transaction KO01? Is it a configuration issue?
Please advise.
Anna

HI,
the reason for creating an internal order "with reference" is to transfer all infos to the new order (even the settlement rule). So after "creation with reference" the settlement rule is copied. If its not the one you need:
1: take a reference order that fits your requirement.
2: for order creation without reference use a "model" order, this "model" order can be assigned to the order type in T-code KOT2_OPA and works similar as a reference, but if the model order does not contain a settlement rule, the created order also does not).
3: change/delete the created settlement rule from the new order.
Best regards, Christian

BAPI for settlement rules in WBS Elements

Hi,
Is there any standard bapi, method, or whatever... to create / modify settlement rules for WBS Elements?.
Rgds,
Jose

Look at BAPI/FM of FG CJ2054
BAPI_BUS2054_CHANGE_MULTI     Change WBS Elements by BAPI
BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI     Create WBS Elements by BAPI
BAPI_BUS2054_DELETE_MULTI     Delete WBS Elements by BAPI
BAPI_BUS2054_GET_GUID_FROM_KEY     Read the GUIDs Using the WBS Keys
BAPI_BUS2054_GET_KEY_FROM_GUID     Read the WBS Keys Using the GUIDs
CJ2054_CHANGE
CJ2054_CREATE
CJ2054_DELETE
CJ2054_WBSELEMENT_CHANGE_STRU
MAP2I_BAPI_BUS2054_CHG_TO_PRPS
MAP2I_BAPI_BUS2054_NEW_TO_PRPS
MAP2I_BAPI_BUS2054_UPD_TO_PRPS
Regards

Automate settlement rule

How to configure the settlement rules to be automatically created when a new project is saved such as for the AUC settlement or Requesting Cost Center?

Automatic settlement rule work for the projects where object class is other than INVESTMENT.
You have to configure in SPRO IMG->>>PS->>>Costs->>>Automatic and Periodic Allocations->>> Settlement->>> Settlement Rule for WBSE ->>> Determine Strategy for Settlement Rule.
Here you can mention your default settlement receiver as requesting cost center / responsible cost center or you can enter a settlement rule for level 1 WBS element and then copy this to all lower levels.
Assign this to Project profile in OPSA transaction under the controlling area tab Settmt rule strat. field.
Then you have to execute the transaction CJB1 / CJB2 for generating the settlement rule automatically to all the WBS elements.
You can search the forum, <link removed>
you can also refer to the online help. <link removed>
Incase of INVESTMENT object class projects, the settlement rule is automatically created by the system when you execute the settlement for project first time, the receiver will be the respective AUC.
Praveen
Edited by: b praveen savan on Sep 14, 2010 6:27 PM
Edited by: Virendra Pal on Sep 15, 2010 4:56 PM
This time I am not deleting the post and do not bank on second chances.

User Exit for the Settle rule of a Production Order

Hello all
i got a requirement to change the settlement rule of a production order to multiple receivers.
suppose i have the following rule
Categeory | Settlement Reciever | Receiver Short text |   %   | Settlement Type | No | Source Assignment
    MAT             ZMDT89                   ZMDT88              100        FUL                 1            left as blank
now my requirement is that i have to default the source assignment as 200 (Materials) so as to allow the other reciever entered with the same settlement type as FUL and also the No should be 2
i.e. my req is like this
Categeory | Settlement Reciever | Receiver Short text |   %   | Settlement Type | No | Source Assignment
    MAT             ZMDT89                   ZMDT88              100        FUL                 1            200
    G/L             G/L A/C no                G/L shor text       100        FUL                 2            100
the bold one is i have to ADD
the T-Code is CO02.
your help is highly appreciated...
thanks in advance

hi,
check these exits in co02.
Transaction Code - CO02                     Change Production Order
Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
PPCO0010                                Enhancement in make-to-order production - Unit of measure
PPCO0012                                Production Order: Display/Change Order Header Data
PPCO0013                                Change priorities of selection crit. for batch determination
PPCO0015                                Additional check for document links from BOMs
PPCO0016                                Additional check for document links from master data
PPCO0017                                Additional check for online processing of document links
PPCO0018                                Check for changes to production order header
PPCO0019                                Checks for changes to order operations
PPCO0021                                Release Control for Automatic Batch Determination
PPCO0022                                Determination of Production Memo
PPCO0023                                Checks Changes to Order Components
STATTEXT                                Modification exit for formatting status text lines
PPCO0009                                Enhancement in goods movements for prod. process order
CCOWB001                                Customer exit for modifying menu entries
COIB0001                                Customer Exit for As-Built Assignment Tool
COZF0001                                Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
COZF0002                                Change purchase req. for externally procured component
PPCO0001                                Application development: PP orders
PPCO0002                                Check exit for setting delete mark / deletion indicator
PPCO0003                                Check exit for order changes from sales order
PPCO0004                                Sort and processing exit: Mass processing orders
PPCO0005                                Storage location/backflushing when order is created
PPCO0006                                Enhancement to specify defaults for fields in order header
PPCO0007                                Exit when saving production order
PPCO0008                                Enhancement in the adding and changing of components
reward points if hlpful.

CJ01 - Old Settlement Rules are Copied

Hi SAP PS Experts,
We have a query When trying to create a project by copying with some other project,
it will copy even the settlement rules which are maintained for final asset.
We know that it can be deleted manually but is there a possibility that it should only copy the Project & WBS
but not settlement rules.
Let me know in case of any further questions.
Regards,
Vikram

Hi Vikram
maybe you will find the CJ20N - copy WBS without settlement rule interesting since it addresses the same problem as you did...
Hope it helps
Panagiotis

CoProducts Settlement rule Deletion

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for