Cost Code problem in Contract Manager 12.0

Has anyone encountered problem creating a Cost Code? When
we tried to create one with the "Planned to Commit" value
greater than 999, it simply refuse to work.
It
states that the field would not accept comma, but Contract
Manager automatically puts a comma in there when the value
is greater than 999.
It essentially makes
Contract Manager 12.0 useless to us. I am wondering if
Contract Manager 12.0 is a Beta release.

This was a bug in v12. Fixed in v12 SP2.

Similar Messages

Problem with running contract manager under WLS as windows service

I am having a problem running Contract Manager V13 as a windows service. I am using weblogic 10gR3 app server running under Windows 2008 sp2 (32 bit). The system functions just fine if run as an application from the command line. When I use the Oracle install contract manager as admin server (using jrockit) script from Oracle support, the service installs OK, but when starting I get:
+"The contract-mgr-svc-jrockit service on Local Computer started and then stopped. Some services stop automatically if they are not in use by other services or programs."+
Has anyone run into this problem of windows services not working? If so how did you fix it?
How are others starting contract manager automatically under Weblogic server, without having to do a manual startup?
I am dealing with this disclaimer from Oracle:
Disclaimer: Contract Management has not been officially tested with WebLogic as a Windows service. If experiencing a problem under this configuration that cannot be reproduced, while running as an application, the solution be to run Contract Management as an application.
and have been working with Oracle support for 2-3 weeks now on this problem without any luck.
Is the situation with using Windows services better if I use JBoss application server? Does Oracle officially support Windows service running with JBoss?
Thanks in advance...

What account is the service running under? It may be that the service does not have access to the folders it needs, or does not have the right java CLASSPATH set.
Can you try running the service under the exact same account that successfully runs via the command line?
Cheers,
Daniel

Contract Manager v 11 problems

Our company purchased Primavera Contract Manager 11.0 a few years ago and never really used it.
If possible I'm trying to get this running as a test server to make sure we can use it for our projects before upgrading to the current version.
I'm installing on Windows XP SP3 and I'm getting a lot of errors.
During installation I received this error.
The populateGroups utility failed.
Rerun this utility after this setup is finished.
I can get to the local login web page but after entering the login info this comes up:
The application's digital signature has an error. Do you want to run the application?
I hit OK.
The application requires and earlier version of Java. Do you want to continue?
DetectPluginApplet
I hit OK.
But it never logs in. It just stays on this login page.
When trying to use database wizard to update databases or creat new one I get the error:
Database Server Error: Named Pipes Provider: Could not oepn a connection to SQL Server [53].
So is there any hope of getting this running or do we have to spend $1K to be able to use this? The boss already spent $2500 so we would like to use
Thank you for any advice.
budgen

Thank you very much.
First off the maintenance support was let go in 2008. We'll have to purchase all those years and 2011 which cost about $1K which we'll do. I just want to get logged into the Application and show the boss what's possible first. I hope v.13 isnt' this difficult but I know I'm learning.
Yes the populategroups utility now works without error.
That EXPADMIN takes me a step further but after trying that login the message below shows up on the login page.
"Cannot open database(s) EXPADMIN, CMDEMO, EXPADMIN, because it was created with a previous release. Please convert the database(s) to version 11.1 or contact your Contract Manager administrator."
I thought I did that already but apparantly not.
Updating the databases to 11.1 isn't very straight forward. Using the CA.exe is rather difficult. I get the error : "Database Server Error: Named Pipes PRovider: Could not open a connection to SQL server [53]."
The CM service is stopped.
Where do I get the Instance Name of the EXPADMIN? It's not in the InstallParameters.log as the others are.
Here's the installParameters.log if that helps:
Contract Manager Database Server:
Database Vendor          - Microsoft SQL Server
Group database name     - cmdemo
Computer Name          - BARRY
Port Number          - Will be obtained during the install
Instance Name          - PRIMAVERA
Username          - exp
Password          - sql
Primavera schedule database Server:
Database Vendor     - Microsoft SQL Server
Computer Name     - Barry
Database Name     - dps_db
Username     - privuser
Password     - privuser
URL          - http://192.168.0.195/myprimavera/comp/ShowProject
Thanks again!

SRM 7.0 / ERP 6.04: Config. of Central Contract Management

Hello,
I want to configure the newly introduced integrated Procure-to-Pay Scenario Central Contract Management.
I found SAP Note number 1268821 where all tasks are described in order to implement the previous scenario.
For correct implementation, business function "Purchasing - SAP SRM Integration" (LOG_MM_P2PSE_1) activation is required in the ERP Systems.
When I run SFW5 t-code in order to activate the previous business function, SAP system gives an alert message.
What are the consequences of this business function activation ??
Thank you
Michele

Hi Michele,
I don't think there will be any consequences, we had certain warning messages aswell when we activated the business functions in ECC 6. Reading the warning messages we could conclude it wasn't any serious problem.
Details on functionalities included in a business function can be viewed here: [http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04_sp/helpdata/en/42/fbded750e61febe10000000a422035/frameset.htm] -> Business Functions (SAP Enhancement Package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0) -> Business Functions in SAP ERP -> Logistics -> Materials Management -> Procurement - SRM Integration
Kind regards,
Tim

Copy Material Codes, Costs, and Cost Code Distribution

Has any one come up with way to copy material codes with their unit prices and cost code distributions from one project(or template) to another? When a user has a large inventory of material codes, it would be helpful to be able to copy, or import these to a new project.
Thanks for any help.

Forgot to mention that CMPlus will copy Materials from one project to another with the unit pricing of the current project HOWEVER, the cost distribution is tied to the contract that the material is associated with. If you are using materials with Daily Reports to track material not related to a contract then this will be all you need. IF you are using Materials in association with line items on a contract/PO then it will populate the selection list but you will need to perform more data entry to properly link to the contract.
By performing this copy from one project to the other the capability to "Generate" materials from a contract or PO is no longer functional because the Material already exists as far a Contract Manager is concerned
One more item to think about - materials can only be associated with one contract - that does not mean that a material can not be used on more than one contract.
I am assuming that since you are asking this question that you have been using materials on your projects and understand the nuances and issues with the way CM handles Materials.

Getting Started with the Contract Manager API

I am looking for a quick way to move invoices that are assigned to the wrong contract or purchase order. (Right now we're deleting the current invoice and creating a new invoice on the correct contract, before re-entering all of the invoice information).
It seems that this might be as simple as changing a key on one (or more?) invoice tables to link it to the correct contract or purchase order, and that the API might be the way to do it.
So, if I wanted to investigate the API, where should I get started? I've read through most of what can be found by searching for "contract manager api" - and most of it seems to be this (http://www.oracle.com/us/products/applications/042740.pdf) or consulting companies. I'd like to see if there's somewhere with examples or a tutorial so that I can determine if this is something I can do.
Thanks!

The only documentation I have seen has come from Oracle Primavera. The documentation on the API is a little week and takes some time to get your head around. On how to make the move of existing invopices to another contract. In my experience it has been best to recreate ratehr than reassign. Of course this can cause much rework and can have ramifications.
Option 1 - Do it by hand. Best way to make sure all of the needed data and business process are followed.Keeps the summary fields calulating properely etc..
Option 2 - Use the API. Sounds eaisier than it is. Really need to be experienced at this otherwise you might as well do it by hand, in fact using the API is JUST LIKE doing it by hand since you must follow the business process in place. In cases where the data entry is so huge I'd pick this route, but we have several years of expereince leveraging the API at this point, so we can get it done. I don't know how you are loading so my exact wording might not match your tables. My approach is to untagle the existing invoices first by removing approvals (if any, certainly applies if doing pay apps). Then starting with the first one, I would load each in the order they need to entered. Several tables may need to be updated/added to: Some of these might be Master Table, SOV, Cost Detail and Attachments at the Master or SOV level. Just from my horrible exapalnation you can see there are some hairs on this.
Option 3 - Change the keys and reference numbers from the back end of the database. Normally NOT RECOMMENDED and onyly should be used in extreme cases where needed. My approach here is to contact Oracle support, discuss issue, get theri recommendation, document it then move forward if needed. Down side of this, especially in the requisition area, is that we have seen the summary information getting thrown off and not calculating properly afterwards. I have seen this more with API than with changing keys, but assume that the same issues would apply since editing from the backend would not trigger code in the applciation to update? If you go this route use Oracle as a resource and do your research to make sure you do not orphan any records in the tables. The Contract Master Key is used in several forms and sometimes the Document NUmber is used as well and both need to be updated when appropriate.

Problem installing SOLUTION MANAGER in db2

Dear consultans;
I have a problem installing solution manager in db2.
In phase 'Import ABAP' the sapinst shows the following message:
Execution of the command "/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load -testconnect" finished with return code 2. Output:
sapparam: sapargv( argc, argv) has not been called.
sapparam(1c): No Profile used.
sapparam: SAPSYSTEMNAME neither in Profile nor in Commandline
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load: START OF LOG: 20080826111928
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load: sccsid @(#) $Id: //bas/700_REL/src/R3ld/R3load/R3ldmain.c#16 $ SAP
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load: version R7.00/V1.4 [UNICODE]
Compiled May 5 2008 21:32:44
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load -testconnect
DbSl Trace: DbSlConnect to 'SOL' as 'sapsol' failed
(DB) ERROR: db_connect rc = 256
DbSl Trace: DbSlConnect to 'SOL' as 'sapsol' failed
(DB) ERROR: DbSlErrorMsg rc = 29
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load: job finished with 1 error(s)
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load: END OF LOG: 20080826111930
ERROR      2008-08-26 11:19:30.422
           CJSlibModule::writeError_impl()
CJS-30023 Process call '/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load -testconnect' exits with error code 2. For details see log file(s) R3load.e
xe.log.
ERROR      2008-08-26 11:19:30.748 [sixxcstepexecute.cpp:951]
FCO-00011 The step testDatabaseConnection with step key |NW_Onehost|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|NW_Onehost_System|ind|ind|ind|ind|2|0|NW_Cr
eateDBandLoad|ind|ind|ind|ind|10|0|NW_ABAP_Import_Dialog|ind|ind|ind|ind|5|0|NW_ABAP_Import|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|testDatabaseConnecti
on was executed with status ERROR ( Last error reported by the step :Process call '/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load -testconnect' exi
ts with error code 2. For details see log file(s) R3load.exe.log.).
The file R3load.exe.log show the following..
(root)sidtsmp:/install/instalacion> more R3load.exe.log
sapparam: sapargv( argc, argv) has not been called.
sapparam(1c): No Profile used.
sapparam: SAPSYSTEMNAME neither in Profile nor in Commandline
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load: START OF LOG: 20080826111928
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load: sccsid @(#) $Id: //bas/700_REL/src/R3ld/R3load/R3ldmain.c#16 $ SAP
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load: version R7.00/V1.4 [UNICODE]
Compiled May 5 2008 21:32:44
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load -testconnect
DbSl Trace: DbSlConnect to 'SOL' as 'sapsol' failed
(DB) ERROR: db_connect rc = 256
DbSl Trace: DbSlConnect to 'SOL' as 'sapsol' failed
(DB) ERROR: DbSlErrorMsg rc = 29
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load: job finished with 1 error(s)
/usr/sap/SOL/SYS/exe/run/R3load: END OF LOG: 20080826111930
And if I do the following sentence it's finished ok
sidtsmp:db2sol 6> db2 connect to SOL
   Database Connection Information
Database server        = DB2/AIX64 9.1.4
SQL authorization ID   = DB2SOL
Local database alias   = SOL
(root)sidtsmp:/sapmnt/SOL/exe> su - db2sol
sidtsmp:db2sol 1> db2 connect to SOL user sapsol
Enter current password for sapsol:
   Database Connection Information
Database server        = DB2/AIX64 9.1.4
SQL authorization ID   = SAPSOL
Local database alias   = SOL
I reboot the server and now the sentence finished wrong.
sidtsmp:db2sol 8> db2 connect to SOL user sapsol
Enter current password for sapsol:
SQL30082N Security processing failed with reason "15" ("PROCESSING FAILURE").
SQLSTATE=08001
sidtsmp:db2sol 9>
Any suggestion?
Best regards,
Julene

Hi Julene.
Just one suggestion really,....
post the question on the Solution Manager forum
Chrs, M

Condition records in contract management

We are using contract management linked to our internal catalog.
When we create the contract we have found that where the contract has multiple lines only the first 8 records get conditions associated with them.
This is causing us an issue as when we download them to update them the task becomes very slow and it is better to manually update. This is not viable for a contract that has 10000 items.
I have checked SAP notes and there do not appear to be any shown on this problem.
Nick J

Dear Poster
Your thread has had no response since it's creation over
1 year ago, therefore, I am closing the thread.
Should the issue still be outstanding please create a new thread in the relevent forum.
Thank you for your compliance in this regard.
Jason Boggans
SAP SRM SDN Moderator

As of Contract Management 13, serial numbers are no longer used.

Hello Primavera users,
We are currently using Contract Manager v12 on a major program here in the UAE and looking to upgrade soon to v13.
Regarding this knowledge base posting (below), does v13 still support concurrent user licenses, and if so what are Oracle's plans moving forward in terms of Contract Manager?
I would love to hear the views of the Primavera community, especially in relation to these changes with serial numbers etc...
Thanks & Regards,
John
Solution ID: prim83632
How To: Adding (new) serial numbers in Contract Management 13
Status: Reviewed
Version(s): 13.0
Problem:     How To: Adding (new) serial numbers in Contract Management 13
Problem:     Where do I add new serial numbers in Contract Management 13?
Problem:     Where are serial numbers stored?
Fix:     As of Contract Management 13, serial numbers are no longer used.

Well, it's just a simple pipe afterall, a tool to give you brief information upon which you decide what to do. Also, there's a minor annoyance, it should go like this:
stat -c '%x %n' /usr/bin/* | sort
I mixed long and short options for a moment there, that gets rid of the '=' in front of every line.

IE or Contract Management v13 thinks my DOCX file is a zip

When trying to open an attachment IE or Contract Management v13 thinks my DOCX file is a zip. This started last Thursday. Outta the blue. We’ve been searching for a days now for a solution. Nothing has helped. I have a few hundred users all with various combinations of applications on their boxes. XP PRO, Windows 7, Office; 2007, 2010, WordPerfect 5.1 files work just fine. :)

We are having the same problem and are wondering whether you found a solution. A workaround is to disable MIME handling in IE (this is what Oracle support will suggest), but this is far from ideal as it does compromise security slightly.
The problem arises when WebLogic (or JBoss, WebSphere....) sends the file to your browser. It marks the file as Content type "application/octet-stream" instead of identifying it as a MS Word 2010 document. This causes IE to try to identify the type itself. First it checks the extension of the file and looks in the registry to see what's there. If it finds an entry, it then reads the first part of the file to see if the content matches what the registry says. Something appears to be broken in the way IE identifies Word 2007+ files, causing it to identify them as .zip files. Users are then prompted to save the file to their desktop.
Word 2007+ files actually ARE zip files under the hood, but until recently we had no problem with them. There appear to be three possible routes to resolve this issue.
One, take Oracle's "pass the buck" advice and disable MIME handling in IE so that IE no longer tries to identify the file (registry hack set HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_MIME_HANDLING\iexplore.exe to 0). This bypasses the problem and introduces security holes to your workstation configuration.
Two, configure your Java application server to send the files with the correct content-type header. I can't find a way to do this in WebLogic so far as you have to modify the web.xml file, which is created by the application installation/deployment. Oracle Primavera CM support has yet to respond to my request on this other than to say "consult WebLogic support". Oracle WebLogic's support will (as they have in the past) tell me it's application specific and to consult Oracle CM support. Neither support group seems to be able to support Oracle's products. (Dear Oracle, please get your act together. You own both products and should be embarrassed by the lack of customer service here.)
Three, figure out why IE is failing to match up the 2007+ file types with the file content. We're assuming a recent patch did this, but haven't identified which one. In any event, we will probably not be allowed to roll back a security patch to fix this.
Anyway, I hope this helps you. I have a case open currently, as well as another post in the forums.
Lowell

Customizing Master Contract Management - SAP Banking 6.0

Hello,
i am customizing the Master Contract Management in Banking 6.0 - especially the Effective Cash Pooling Feature.
On defining the restriction rules i have a problem:
How do i define the methods and the rule-id's for Cash Pooling.
Where is the connection between the methods and the rule-id's ?
The SAP documentation is very unclear in this special topic.
Tnx
Sebastian

Francesco Martire wrote:
> - install EHP4 without installing any Java stack
Yes, it is, as informed above;
> - activate (for example) HCM_TMC_CI_1, HCM_TM_ANALYTICS_1, HCM_OSA_CI_1 and CA_HAP_CI_1
They're ABAP, right? So, YES, you can activate them;
> - customizing Performance Management though its transactions
This is mostly an application question, so you need to refer to their documentation or on their forum;
> - use BAPIs and BADIs from custom presentation logic
Same as above;
> ...or is some business logic affected by not installing Java and EP?
From a technical point of view, there's no interdependency between ABAP <-> Java regarding the functionality of the system. This means in you can install/uninstall (or have/don't have) them apart that each components/transactions will work w/o problems. However, you should check with Application about potentially limitations/problems on this matter.
I hope this information clarifies.
Best regards,
Tomas Black

Question on Contract Manager Adminstrator roles

I have a question on IT roles around contract manager. What do people typically see as far as contract manager IT administrator roles ?
We are deploying contract manager to a user base of about 500 users and perhaps 100 concurrent users (eventually). Right now we have a small production deployment for 3-4 construction projects.
We are trying to figure out how to structure the contract manager admin role. One idea we have is to establish a 1st level of support, provisioning users and possibly setting up new projects. I could be involved in a 2nd level of support, dealing with more infrastructure problems, such as defining new security templates, configuring document attachment storage, troubleshooting problems with the server or with letters. We’d structure it this way so that the day-to-day work of dealing with users would fall to the 1st level of support and the more backend problems would fall to me. I have some other projects I’m involved in so the day-to-day dealing with CM users would not be as much of a burden on me.
My boss is concerned about clear cut roles. If his group is responsible for an enterprise system (contract manager) then only members of his team (me) have the power to do things like modify the configuration of CM, start/stop the server, reboot the machine. Other IT team members, not a member of his team (1st level support person) could have admin privileges to deal with user/project provisioning only. 1st level support person wouldn’t have full administrator privileges. Is this technically possible? Does the security model of CM support such a division of labor?
What else have people seen that works as far as roles? Is having just one person take on both user/project provisioning and the rest of the admin tasks doable? If a single person is managing contract manager, is this a part-time load or a full-time load? Recall that I’m slated to be involved in other projects such as UCM in general, I/PM (Oracle Imaging and Process Management), possibly some integration projects too.
Are there any guidelines for best practices around admin roles?
If anyone has any experience/opinions on Primavera P6 roles I’d like to hear about them also.

Yes, the arrangement you describe with you being the 2nd level support (server level functions) and another person being 1st level (user admin, etc) is certainly technically possible. You would have full admin rights to the server on which CM resides, and the 1st level person would only require access to the CM Admin web-based interface through an ID and password. From what you describe, that person would not need physical access to the server at all in order to handle the user account management.
Now, based on the number of users which you descibe, it really sounds like a full time job for at least two people. These numbers will vary based on how much the CM app will be customized and integrated with other systems. Beyond the IT support you describe, there will be a need to have "super-user" level users that can handle the application level requests such as how do I add a new contact, what value do I put in that field, etc.
Although it's becoming more common, 500 users is still a large implementation in the PCM world. I've seen organizations with up to 10 IT type people involved with implementations of that scale, but maybe not all full time.
Rick

Central Contract Management

Dear SAP Experts,
I have a few questions regarding our implementation of SRM and ECC.
FYI, we are planning to use SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.05 as backend.
We’re planning to utilize Central Contract Management functionality in SRM, where we negotiate the price in SRM then we distribute the contract to ECC. In ECC we create PR, which have reference to this contract (contract number in SRM is different with ECC). So this PR will have assigned source of supply, is it possible for us then to create PO automatically from tcode ME59? The reason we ask this because we see in documentation that every PO in ECC created with reference to contact in SRM, ECC will need to check first the current price in the SRM contract, so we would like to confirm whether it is working if we use ME59 (we plan to use ME59 as background job and unfortunately we don’t have the testing system yet to verify this).
We’re planning to have PR created in ECC. However we would like to utilize MDM catalog as well. Is it possible that during PR creation we can select items from the catalog?
We’re planning to have implement SRM 7.01 in 2 waves. In first wave we will only use Self Service Procurement and Strategic Sourcing (using classic deployment where the leading PO is in ECC). However in the second wave, we’re planning to implement SUS (Supplier Collaboration). In SUS, we would like to activate the business function, so the vendor will response RFx and participate in auction from SUS itself. The question is…is it possible for us to have it planned like this? For example, in first wave, the RFx and auction will use SRM server itself, however in the second wave, we will switch it to SUS. Our concern is that the switch will happen to the productive server already. Is this okay?
Thanks
Varian

Hi,
When you distribute the central contract to ECC system, it creates a new contract in ECC system.
When you create PR, you can assign this contract as source of supply.
Then automatic PO creation if your settings for automatic PO is maintained.
In ECC 6.04 also catalog integration is possible. So for your version 6.05 there is absolutely no problem. The same OCI interface parameters have to be maintained in MM system for catalog.
Your two stage implementation is absolutely possible.
With Regards,
Malay

ERP release for Central Contract Management with SRM 7.0 EhP 1

Hi all,
i would like to have clarification with ERP and SRM release combinations regarding SRM 7.0 EhP1.
Indeed, the "Software Component Matrix for SAP SRM 7.0 EHP1", for Operational Contract Management, tells 'EHP 5 for SAP ERP 6.0 required'.
Moreover, in RKT dealing with SRM EhP1 delta overview, ERP 6.0 with EhP5 is mandatory for an upgrade to SRM7.01.
Nevertheless, i would like to have confirmation regarding this point.
We do not want to use PI to execute the Enterprise Services for CCM. So, we intend to switch BF SRM_WSRM_1 on.
But on the ERP side (EhP5), the only BF dealing with Contract Management is LOG_MM_P2PSE_2 which description is about Service Procurement (and more exactly for item hierarchies).
Does it mean we can use SRM 7.01 with ERP 6.0 EhP4 and without PI but only if we do not use Central Contracts with service hierarchies ?
Thank you for your help.
Regards.
Laurent.

Hi Laurent,
Yes.
When Central contract was designed in SRM 7.0 with ERP EhP4, it was designed with no service hierarchy. But in SRM 7.01 Central contral was enhanced to handle service hierarchy and it works with ERP EhP5. The problem is when we have SRM 7.01 and ERP EhP4. To handle this complication SRM 7.01 was designed to send flat service lines to EhP4 and lower release even though Central contract in SRM has service hierarchy. So while transfering to ERP EhP4 system in standard, all outlines are not consider for transfer and only service lines (Functional items) are transferred to ERP. To do so user needs to maintain the backend destination information of the connected backend system in table BBP_BACKEND_DEST via SM30 transaction with correct system type (for EhP4 system it will be ERP_4.0 and for EhP5 ERP_5.0). SAP Standard program checks this while XML generation for transfer and if system type is ERP_4.0 system it removes all outlines from temp table before generating the XML data. When it is done, ERP has only service lines in its XML and it does the manupulation to create the replication of central contract.
Master Guide (Including Upgrade Information) - SAP SRM 7.01 states:
"The use of SAP NetWeaver PI is optional but it is required for outbound XML-based messaging or for connecting non-SAP planning or execution systems."
So service hierarchy is possible in SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.04 but only with PI. For other CCM functionalities, SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.04 without PI works fine.
Best regards,
Christian Zeuch

Error Code U44M1P210 Adobe Application Manager?

After installing the trial for Adobe Premiere Elements 11, I get error messages whenever I run updates on my existing (installed) CS5 software.
The main error code is: Adobe Application Manager - There was an error installing this update. Please quit and try again later. Error Code: U44M1P210. None of the CS5 products were able to be updated including Camera Raw.
Any help/feedback would be awesome.
Thanks!

Hey Maria,
I think finally have a solution to your problem without a peek into your system
It took me a little while to confirm if the following links to the updates could be shared:
win: http://swupdl.adobe.com/updates/oobe/aam20/win/PhotoshopCameraRaw7-7.0/7.2.82/Setup.zip
mac: http://swupdl.adobe.com/updates/oobe/aam20/mac/PhotoshopCameraRaw7-7.0/7.2.82/Setup.dmg
Please download & install updates from one of the links above. I hope this resolves your update problem.
Please refer to the below mentioned link for more details around the links:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4751351
Thanks.
~ Shefali

Cost Code problem in Contract Manager 12.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for