Cost of Goods Sold not flowing to CO-PA

Dear Experts,
I have assigned VPRS (statistical condition type) to CO-PA value field in KE4I,but when I create billing document,the COGS value is not flowing to COPA.
Can anybody help me as WHAT is missing in configuration for not flowing COGS to CO-PA?
Treat it very...... .
Regards
Su

Hi,
Can anybody explian the logic behind the documents triggered by the system in the following scenarios?
At the time of PGI:
COGS A/c Dr to FG Stock A/c (Accounting Document)
COGS A/c (CO Document and No COPA Document)
At the time of Billing
Customer A/c Dr to Sales A/c (FI Document)
Sales A/c-PSG for Sales A/cs (CO Document)
All the line items relating to Sales Revenue (CO-PA Document)
So finally in FI under P&L,COGS A/c in Debit side and Sales in Credit side appears as Customer and FG Stock comes under Balance sheet.
The above said entries are correct and Standard SAP behaves the same.
Regards
Su

Similar Messages

OM:Cost of Goods sold work flow customization to take it from concerned off

OM:Cost of Goods sold work flow customization to take it from concerned office in the place of inventory org

Yes FOX can be difficult to achieve things that are simpler than simple
The way you described, it will only search fo a standard price on the same currency.
Try to set the currency as changeable characteristic and then search prices for each possible currency.
standard price value = {standard price, currency1} + {standard price, currency2} etc..
The possible currencies could also be filled in a variable which is read at runtime.
Don't know an easier way!
Regards,
Beat

Cost of good sold account not updated

Hi all,
Could you please advise me on the below issue
Through sales process billing was completed on fin year 2007.
In the material master standard price maintained u201C 0u201D because of this reason cost of good sold account did not updated in FI.
But the billing document was generated as per billing conditions.
Physically the inventory has been reduced from the warehouse stock and valued appropriately.
The financial year already closed, please advise how should rectify this.
KSR

Hi all,
Please advise how to coreect this in finacial year 2008.
KSR

Ke24 cost of goods sold field reporting future price not actual cost.

Hi Guru's
KE24 line item report is showing a future price in the costs of goods sold field. Can this report be configured to show the actual costs of goods sold from the relevant accounting document.
thanks

Thanks Mr Ajay for understanding my question.
As I told mentioned in my initial question that I have created the GL:500000 (COGS) when CRM/SD issues the stock for delivery.
What my FI done is that the same GL (500000) is assigned both in GBB-VAX and GBB-VAY as per the client requirement.
Now suggest me as how to come out from this situation?
If I need to do Validation ,request you to give your guidance as how to do it as I never done.
Thnaks in advance.
Su

How to add inventory when inbound individual purchasing, not Cost of goods sold?

Hi, Experts,
I'd like to add inventory when inbound individual purchasing for sales order.
Usually it adds cost of goods sold, but for client requirement, i hope i can change it to inventory instead.
I've seen some description how to do it before, but i can't find it now...
Could you help me or tell me where the description is?
Thanks in advance.

are you eventually looking for this one: Valuated Sales Order Stock Configuration - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki

Wanted flow of this OM: Generate Cost of Goods Sold Account (OECOGS)"–

Hi All
I want to customize standard Workflow "OM: Generate Cost of Goods Sold Account (OECOGS)"– generates COGS account when interfacing invoices to AR. Scenario is like this
Standard Oracle Entries generated at sales
COGS Dr 110.00
To Inventory A/c Cr 110.00
Based on some %age we need to break the entries as below.
Customization required:
Materials Dr 50.00
Labour Dr 40.00
Over Head Dr 20.00
to Inventory A/c Cr. 110.00
Is this Possible in Customization? If possible can you give the idea.
This workflow will run when interfacing invoices to AR, I want to know name of pl/sql procedure which is transfering the date form OM to AR Interface table???
Please look into this

Hi;
Please check below which could be helpful for your issue:
COGS WORKFLOW FAILING DURING INTERFACE TRIP STOP - 'OECOGS/#SYNCH' [ID 1072959.1]
Common Errors and Solutions when Using Workflow in Order Management [ID 429462.1]
Also see:
Workflow customization
Re: Workflow Customization
Regard
Helios

Cost of goods sold for trading goods

In my company Cost based copa is configured.
We do manufacture and sale the goods, also we do trading to goods. for manufacturing goods the standard cost estimation is released but for trading we are not doing std cost estimation. In SD pricing procedure VPRS condition is incorporated to get cost of good manufactured. Now i want the cost of goods sold for Trading material to flow to co-pa.
How do i do it?
Do i need to create and release the std cost estimate for trading material? or there is any way i can manage the cogs to flow to co-pa actual cost.
Regards
Sanjay Petkar

One way is certainly to create standard cost estimates for the purchased products. Depending on your costing view qty structure and MRP view procurement settings you can use either CK40N or costing without qty stucture.
If you want moving average, then you need to exclude the purrchased material type from looking for a cost estimate in COPA, and then you need to link VPRS to your cost of sales key figure in PA.

Substituting Cost of Goods Sold Account Profit Center

Hi
I am using Sales Order substitution to change the Profit Center according to Sales Org + Product Hierarchy + Customer Group + Acct Asst Grp. This perfectly replace the Profit Center in Sales Order. The Profit Center from Sales Order is perfectly flowing to Outbound Delivery.
While doing PGI, in accounting document, Cost of Goods Sold line item is not getting the profit center from outbound delivery. It post COGS line item with Material Master profit center. We want profit center of Cost of Goods Sold line item is same as Sales order / Outbound Delivery.
I checked SCN, everyone provided the solution of using FI Substitution to change the Profit Center of COGS line item.
Is it any other way it can be achieved? if FI Substitution is only the way, can anyone provide the sample code, so that it can be developed fast.
Thanks
Venkat Ramachandran

For those who may need an answer to this, our solution was the following:
1)       Created new types for SO, SO Item, Sched. Line, Delivery, Delivery Item, Billing type
2)       Created new Pricing procedure
3)       Created new movement type Y61/Y62 modeled after 601/602
4)       Mapped Y61/Y62 to account modifier ZAX.
5)       Mapped GBB/ZAX to the new account.
Benefits, they now have better view of the orders going inter-company. It is flexible enough to adjusting prices for intercompany separate from standard orders, even though for now it is a straight copy of cost. They are able to remove the sales/use tax, from the calculations. They are able to plan with these orders separated out. Plus, this will standardize their process for inter-company.
Hope this helps someone.
Cheers!
Rick

Posting of Commission Exp to calculate the Cost of Goods Sold

Hi Team,
I do work in an automobile manufacturing organization and is new to SAP FI module. I have a business requirement which I need to fulfill; I would appreciate if all you gurus help me with finding the solution.
Business Scenario: at present, we are posting the following entries to record the commission we paid to dealers for selling vehicles.
Commission Exp (DR)
Customer (CR)
Customer (DR)
Dealer (CR)
With these entries we are not been able to track the commission based on vehicle variants i.e. Toyota GLI, XLI etc.
New Requirement:
To calculate the Cost of Goods Sold for a variant, I need to track the commission expense based on vehicleu2019s variants. Please help me in finding the solution.
Thanks

Thanks for quick response.
Let me give little more details of type of commission entries we have
1) Normal Commission - Fixed commission variant wise and is derived from SD.
2) Additional Commission - No predefined formula, this is totally based on top management discretion. Management decides how much would be paid to a particular dealer.
3) Sliding Commission deduction - Deduction of certain amount from commission on late payments.
4) Additional Sliding Commission - Payment of additional commission based on early payment terms.
Currently, FI department is calculating all these figures on Excel sheets and then post a JV for each type of above mentioned commission.
How can I configure the system to calculate these amounts automatically without involving Excel Sheet help?
and how to post these amounts variant wise along with dealers and customers.

Cost of Goods sold in cross company sales

Hi ,
We have a situation where we need to transfer goods from one company code and site ( Company A ) to another company code and site ( Company B )at the cost price of company A. We are creating a purchase order for this goods from Company B to Comapny A and in turn a sales order is issued for this from Company A.We pick up purchase price in PO from as the Per unit cost of comapny A.
The issue arises here about in the delivery from company A where the cost of goods sold in delivery is done based on the total stock value divided by the quantity sold as this is SAP method of calculation and this does not always match with the per unit cost. Currently we are passing this difference as discounts.
This is the best we could achieve where by we have been able to satisfy the business need of having no difference on the purchanse price of company B and sales price of company A.
My question is : Whether is there any more effecient method of achieving the desired result without having the difference which we are currently passing on as discounts ???
Would really appreciate any help.
Thanks and Regards,
Kartik Shah

Hi Raj/ Mahendro,
Thank you for sending me the reply. I will briefly explain you the our process. The purchase from external vendor is done in warehouse belonging to one company code. The purchase is done at Moving average price but normally for an article there are no price variations. Goods receipt in warehouse is done after adding freight and insurance onto the cost of article.This is the value at which we want to transfer to another site in anotehr company code.
Now the replneshiment requirement from the other site which belongs to different company code raises a PO on to the warehouse. This PO picks up the article price (KOMV-KBETR) as the MAP from the warehouse (MBEW-VERPR). However the field MBEW-SALK3 for the warehouse is not exactly the quantity multiplied by MAP.It is actually the VERPR field which has the value based on the field SALK3 divided by the stock quantity and rounded off to the two decimal places. There is slight variation here itself due to the rounding of the total stock value and then again rounding at the per unit price.( Both the above fields of MBEW)
What we are doing on the sales order is to pass the MBEW-VERPR as EDI1 and the sotck value for the quantity ordered ( ZDEI a new condition) by the site as MBEW-SALK3 divided by the total stock at that point and multiply by the quantity ordered. So due to rounding differences there is difference in the value of EDI1 and ZEDI . Again during the billing from warehouse this condition ZEDI picks up the stock value based on the quantity delivered.
Since there are minor differences due to the rounding of values between per unit price and the actual stock value this are being passed off as discount and the payables by the ordering site and receivables from the warehouse are the same. Cost of goods sold from warehouse is the actual stock value being sold which is the revenue for the warehouse.
Even if we use the standard SAP stock transport order with billing how could we ensure that we do not have even this minor differences.
Doing away with another document is not the requirement since we already have automated the process of sales order creation from the pruchase orders.
Do you think we can achieve our requirement using SAP standard process? Except for this rounding differences we are fine with the current process as well.
Do Look forward to your answer.
Warm Regards,
Kartik Shah

Cost of Goods Sold - Cost Element asking Cost Object

Dear All,
We have defined a G/L account :500000 (Cost of Goods Sold - Field Status Group:G030).
Normally we should not create it as a cost element,but when CRM consultant does a transaction ,system asks that GL account :500000 not created as a cost element,Hence that time I have created as a cost element.
Now every time ,system is asking for cost object for this cost element.
As you all know that ,we can maintain in OKB9,but in our scenario,we have more than 3500 Cost Centers,which is not possible.
Can anybody share as how to resolve this issue?
Regards
Subbu

Thanks Mr Ajay for understanding my question.
As I told mentioned in my initial question that I have created the GL:500000 (COGS) when CRM/SD issues the stock for delivery.
What my FI done is that the same GL (500000) is assigned both in GBB-VAX and GBB-VAY as per the client requirement.
Now suggest me as how to come out from this situation?
If I need to do Validation ,request you to give your guidance as how to do it as I never done.
Thnaks in advance.
Su

Cost of Goods sold value problem

Dear all,
In a Make To Stock, material use "Moving average" case.
For example
1-Sep: Moving avg = $30
15-Sep: Sales & PGI (A)
30-Sep: Moving avg = $70
30-Sep: Sales & PGI (B)
First of all, I expect the Cost of goods sold for Sales & PGI (A) should be $30, and $70 for (B).
Is that correct?
However, now I have all the Sales & PGI entries created on 30-Sep,
And the posting date is controlled by the Actual GI Date in the Delivery.
And I found that both PGI value became $70!!!
Could anyone explain that to me??? Or could anyone provide me a solution to this?
Many Thanks!
Best regards,
Chris

PLease check this SAP note. I think this will solve your problem
The following example should demonstrate how such prices can come about. The main cause of the steep rise in the price is that a posting, the value of which is externally predefined, results in a stock quantity which is close to zero. Furthermore, goods receipts exist which are valuated with the current moving average price since no external amount is specified.
Example:
Overview:
                                  Quantity        Value    MAP
(1) Initial stock:                0 items        0.00 $   200.00 $
(2) GR for 1st purchase order: +1500 items +300,000.00 $
    Stock after (2)            1500 items 300,000.00 $   200.00 $
(3) GR for 2nd purchase order: +1500 items +330,000.00 $
    Stock after (3)            3000 items 630,000.00 $   210.00 $
(4) GI for the delivery:       -2849 items -598,290.00 $
    Stock after (4)              151 items   31,710.00 $   210.00 $
(5) Reversl of 150 itms from (1)-150 items -30,000.00 $
    Stock after (5)                1 item    1,710.00 $1,710.00 $
(6) Inventory difference        +150 items +256,500.00 $
    Stock after (6)              151 items +258,210.00 $ 1,710.00 $
(7) Reversl of 150 itms from (1)-150 items -30,000.00 $
    Stock after (7)                1 item +228,210.00 $ 228,210.00 $
Detail:
1. In the following, say for material X price control 'V', the moving average price is 200.00 $ and the current entire valuated stock is 0 items.
Assume you have a purchase order of 1500 items at 200.00 $ each. Moreover, 10 partial goods receipts are now posted for each of 150 items for this purchase order, so that material X then has a total stock of 1500 items with a value of 300,000.00 $.
2. Another purchase order now exists of 1500 items at 220.00 $ each. Here also, 10 partial goods receipts are posted for each of 150 items goods receipt. As a consequence, material X now has a total stock of 3000 items with a value of 630,000.00 $. The moving average price is thus 210.00 $.
3. Now let's look at a delivery of 2849 items. This is valuated as follows using the logic of the quantity to be posted * total value / total stock. This leads to a total stock of 150 items with a value of 31,710.00 $. This does not affect the moving average price, and thus remains 210.00 $ also after the posting.
Now consider the following postings:
4. You reverse the first goods receipt under 1. This reversal would valuate the goods receipt of 150 items with a value of 30,000.00 $. As a result Material X after posting has a total stock of 1 item with a value of 1,710.00 $. The moving average price would thus already be 1,710.00 $.
5. There is now an inventory difference of 150 items without entering an external amount. This posting is valuated with the moving average price and leads to a stock quantity of 151 items with a stock value of 258,210.00 $.
6. You now enter another reversal for one of the partial goods receipts cited under 1. This then is valuated again with a price of 200.00 $. This results in the material having a stock of 1 item with a value of 228,210.00 $.
If you now repeat transactions/events 6 and 7, you can imagine that the moving average price grows rather quickly.
Solution
This effect is both from a business and accounting point of view the logical result if there are a lot of goods receipts which have to be valuated with the moving average price and goods issues which in contrast to this are posted with an externally predefined amount.
You can determine tolerance limits for the moving average price variances in Customizing (Transaction: OMC0). Further information can also be found in the R3 guide: MM - Invoice verification and material valuation.

Cost of Goods Sold and Inventory Value

Hi
I am looking to setup KPI for Inventory Turns in BI. This needs "Cost of Goods Sold" and "Inventory Value" for Orders for a Plant.
I wanted to know if this information is directly available in any standard extract or do I need to write a Custom Extract for this. I did try searching for this but not able to find this information directly. Do I need to derive the information from some other Key Figures?
TIA
Abhishek

COGS Value we are getting for the COGS GL Account from FIGL. We are using the extract 0FI_GL_4 and then from the DSO 0FIGL_O02
Inventory value we are taking from the Cube 0IC_C03. Please note that the Transformations to the DataSource 2LIS_03_BX, 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_UM are available in the latest Patch 11 for BI Content 703 and should be used instead of the old Transfer Rule/Update Rule.
Regrads
Abhishek

Cost of Goods Sold Accounts by Region

Hi Friends,
While doiing the GL settings base on Item Groups, there is an option to set the Revenue Account based on Domestic.EU.Foreign.
Bu why is there no Cost of Goods of Sold accounts based on that.
Is Cost of Goods Sold account use for calculating gross profit. If so it makes sense to have a single Cost of Goods Sold.
Can anyone correct me if ia m wrong and please explain to me why Cost of Goods Sold account is not divided in to Domestic, EU, Foreign.
Further what is the Expenses Account, in GL settings according to Item Groups, mean.
Thanks & Regards
Shiva

Hey Julie,
We also need to use a different GL account for inter-company and I am wondering where do you setup GL account by warehouse?
Can you please provide the menu path or transaction code?
Thanks,
Kundan

Cost of price difference and cost of goods sold

Dear All,
I got the explanation from forum :
The price variance differences are posted per purchased item which are used in making the material to be sold. this difference rolls to the COS line, but not the COGS account.
May I know what is the difference of cost of goods sold and cost of sales. Both also cost, cost of goods sold is inventory turned to cost upon goods sold whereas cost of sales, to me, can be indirect cost.
Any help to further explain of COS in relation to price variance?
Thanks

Hi
In SAP there is a concept of COGS, but there is no concept of COS.. COS is more of a accounting terminology,... There are different schools of thought on COS/... Some companies treat COS = COGS + Selling overhead...
With Material Ledger, the variances of components purchased can be rolled up to the Header Material which consumes them.... If this header mat is consumed in further processes, the consumption can also be revaluated.... Going So on and so forth, you can also revaluate the COGS of the final material....
Simply said, when variances are rolled up, you can revaluate the inventory... If the inventory is consumed before revaluation, then you can revaluate Consumption / COGS....
Hope this helps
Regards
Ajay M

Cost of Goods Sold not flowing to CO-PA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for