Create query in Oracle 11g

Dear All,
i have a below create statement query in my Oracle Database - sql developer, when i tried this getting with the exception " 00907. 00000 - "missing right parenthesis"
CREATE TABLE FQ01_AA_FUTURE_INSTALLMENTS_M1 ( RECORD_ID VARCHAR (35),
mv_seq INT (4),
sv_seq INT (4),
PAY_TYPE VARCHAR (30),
PAY_PROP VARCHAR (30),
PAY_PROP_AMT FLOAT (30),
PAY_METHOD VARCHAR (30),
PAY_AMT FLOAT (30),
JB_DATE_IMPORT TIMESTAMP)
Is there any mistake on the above query, please update me....
Thanks
karthi

hi,
you can't determine digit for int
and I think you should replace float with number and varchar with varchar2
CREATE TABLE FQ01_AA_FUTURE_INSTALLMENTS_M1 ( RECORD_ID VARCHAR (35),
mv_seq number (4),
sv_seq number (4),
PAY_TYPE VARCHAR (30),
PAY_PROP VARCHAR (30),
PAY_PROP_AMT FLOAT (30),
PAY_METHOD VARCHAR (30),
PAY_AMT FLOAT (30),
JB_DATE_IMPORT TIMESTAMP)
Regards

Similar Messages

Create workspace in Oracle 11g + APEX 2.2 fails

Anybody come across this one?
I have Oracle 11g database installed where I have removed APEX 3.0 and downgraded to APEX 2.2 (due to my clients not having upgraded yet).
I'm using the embedded PL/SQL gateway in the Oracle XML DB HTTP server.
Navigating to APEX login page and logging in as ADMIN is OK but when I want to create a new workspace (based on existing schema) it returns following error:-
ORA-20001: Request 824807541251920 could not be processed. -20001 ORA-20001: Unable to grant initial privs. ORA-20001: Error with: GRANT CREATE JOB TO "IPP" ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
I followed the post-installation steps that came with the installation guide of 11g but they really apply to APEX 3.0. Should I not have done that and instead followed the APEX 2.2 post-installation steps? Those are not clear however on configuring the embedded HTTP server.

SOLVED.
All I needed to do was log in as system and:-
GRANT CREATE JOB TO FLOWS_020200 WITH ADMIN OPTION
Not sure why it was missing though.

Parallel query in Oracle 11g

We use Oracle 11g DB on windows2008R2.
We wrote very long and heavy SELECT SQL query usign several table join and sub-queries and it take very long time to get result.
We did SQL statement tuning as much as we can do so far. ( I will get the Execution Plan and ADDM, etc access right)
I today notice about Parallel query function.
Where could I write parallel hint phrases in very long SELECT SQL query ?
In each selected tables like below ?
/sample in Oracle Doc/
SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(employees 4) PARALLEL(departments 4)
USE_HASH(employees) ORDERED */ MAX(salary), AVG(salary)
FROM employees, departments
WHERE employees.department_id = departments.department_id
GROUP BY employees.department_id;

You need to be careful with some of the examples in the docs. The example you quote includes an unnecessary join. Before considering parallel query, it should have been re-written to this:
SELECT MAX(salary), AVG(salary)
FROM employees
WHERE department_id is not null
GROUP BYdepartment_id;
Later versions of the CBO may do this re-write for you, but it is important to understand why the SQL is inefficient before throwing parallel servers at it. Are you sure that all your joins are actually necessary? (I know you are just going to say "yes", but you might want to think about it first.)

Create tablespace in Oracle 11g

Windows 2008 R2 (64-bit OS)
Oracle 11g R2 Standard Edition ONE(64-bit database)
I use the following Oracle command to create tablespace in 11g.
CREATE TABLESPACE TEST_TBS
DATAFILE
'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\TEST_TBS01.DBF' SIZE 5M
AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 5M
MAXSIZE 50000M;
- The above command works fine.
Is there any better commands i need to be using in creating a tablespace w.r.t. performance and management.

TSharma wrote:
it is recommended to have small sized blocks for OLTP, and big sized for DSS. The reasons:
You can try different block sizes in tablespaces...
On OLTP, a smaller block size reduces contention:
1. Reduces the possibility of concurrent transaction and locks on the same block.
2. Provides a better locking mechanism
3. Less transacction locks possibilities at the block header.
DSS benefit from big blocks mainly because of IO:
1. Retrieves in less IO operations more data, which is critical for FTS and index scans.
2. A higher row density means less IO
3. Indexes retrieve information on a block per block basis, with big blocks indexes are retrieved with less IO
4. Reduces the chances of chained rows.
Check the following link for examples and details information.If johnpau needs a 50G file he has no choice: 16K blocks is the only option.
But that advice about different blocksizes is very twentieth century. Nowadays, it doesn't matter.

How to create user in Oracle 11g Console Administration through browser

Hi
I installed Oracle 11g on my Windows XP system
then i opened the console through IE 8.0 using the address "https://serversys:1158/em"
then i logged into this console by the username SYS/SYS@orcl as SYSDBA
then i opened the SCHEMA tab
but here i didn't found any link like "USERS" to create/manage users
How can i create the users..?
thanks in advance
jk

user10922309 wrote:
Yes, Hans i am planning to become a DBA from India.Good. If you ever move to North America to become a DBA, let us know. >:)
With the help of your link "admqs_administer_users.htm"
i found that bold "Users" link in "Server" tab bold
but right now i am getting the error "ora-01301: insufficient privilages"
then i granted the 'create user' privilege to SYS
error is coming..If you have properly logged on as SYS, as shown by the 'Logged in as SYS' note in the upper right corner, you should not be getting the 1301. Try logging out and following the steps in the document I gave you starting at chapter 1.

Query tuning - oracle 11g

Hi all,
Query executes for more 1.5 hours. fetches the data from a remote database. more than million records.
any suggestions to tune the query?
Explain Plan
CREATE TABLE STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 3,777 Bytes: 1,161,660 Cardinality: 15,285
     5 LOAD AS SELECT hcl_delta_TMP_2
          4 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 3,768 Bytes: 1,161,660 Cardinality: 15,285
               2 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 1 Bytes: 693 Cardinality: 99
                    1 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) DELTA_REASON_CODES_PK Cost: 1 Bytes: 693 Cardinality: 99
               3 REMOTE REMOTE SERIAL_FROM_REMOTE PSM_LIB_LOG_R RMDB Cost: 74 Bytes: 10,626 Cardinality: 154
Query:
CREATE TABLE hcl_delta_tmp_2 AS
SELECT
'hcl' AS heritage,
load_dt,
process_dt,
update_status_cd,
loan_number,
lib_date,
lib_time,
lib_code,
lib_user_id,
lib_log_key_date_time
FROM psm_lib_log_r@RMDB a
WHERE a.process_dt >= TO_DATE('01/01/2010','MM/DD/YYYY') AND
a.update_status_cd NOT IN( 'P' ) AND
a.lib_code IN
SELECT TRIM(delta_code) AS delta_code
FROM delta_reason_codes
Delta code column is a primary key in table delta_reason_codes: DELTA_REASON_CODES_PKVersion : Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
thanks.

I think I am getting conflicting information about how many rows are in the remote table.
First we read that the remote table has more than 10 million records and then we read that applying this where clause WHERE a.process_dt >= TO_DATE('01/01/2010','MM/DD/YYYY')
AND a.update_status_cd NOT IN ('P') Results in that will be too many records, more than 10 millions.What are the total number of rows in the remote table?
How many rows match the date condition by itself?
How many match the status code condition by itself?
How many match the lib_code condition by itself?
How many rows match all conditions (the number returned by the query)?
Sorry, but I am just trying clear up any confusion here.

Tune this "contains" query in Oracle 11g EE 11.2.0.3.0

I have a query like below. It runs for ever. The size of this table is not very big, it has around 30 millions rows. The owner column is very selective, and I've added "owner' column in the "filter by" clause of the domain index against description. Do you have any recommendation how I can tune this query? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
select count(*) from items s where contains(s.description, '%111%' ) > 0 and s.owner = 1234;
Thanks.

You need to use SDATA to access the owner column through the index. You may also get better performance on your wildcard searches by using a wordlist with attributes as shown below. Please see the demonstration below.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> create table items as
2 select object_id as owner, object_name as description
3 from   all_objects
4 /
Table created.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> insert into items values (1234, 'A111B')
2 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> select count(*) from items
2 /
COUNT(*)
     75048
1 row selected.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> begin
2    ctx_ddl.create_preference('mywordlist', 'BASIC_WORDLIST');
3    ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_INDEX','TRUE');
4    ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_MIN_LENGTH', 1);
5    ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','SUBSTRING_INDEX', 'YES');
6    ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist', 'wildcard_maxterms', 50000) ;
7 end;
8 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> create index items_idx
2 on items (description)
3 indextype is ctxsys.context
4 filter by owner
5 parameters ('wordlist mywordlist')
6 /
Index created.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> set autotrace on explain
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> select count(*) from items
2 where contains (description, '%111% and (sdata (owner = 1234))') > 0
3 /
COUNT(*)
         1
1 row selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1238254566
| Id | Operation        | Name      | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1 |    29 |    12   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE |           |     1 |    29 |            |          |
|* 2 |   DOMAIN INDEX   | ITEMS_IDX |    39 | 1131 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("CTXSYS"."CONTAINS"("DESCRIPTION",'%111% and (sdata
              (owner = 1234))')>0)
Note
   - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2>

How to tune self join query in Oracle 11g

Oracle & SQL new to me,and I'm still in learning phase.
Could you please help me to tune below oracle query?? This table contains ~95 lac records and it takes 1 hour to retrieve data using this query.
Your suggestions/comments/help will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
SELECT A.CNO AS CNO, A.FNO AS FNO, A.CID AS CID, A.IID AS IID
FROM CAC_LKP A, (SELECT C_DATE, CNO, FNO
FROM (SELECT MAX(CAC_LKP.C_DATE) AS C_DATE, CAC_LKP.CNO AS CNO, CAC_LKP.FNO AS FNO
FROM CAC_LKP
WHERE ACTIVE = 'Y' GROUP BY CNO, FNO)) B
WHERE A.C_DATE = B.C_DATE
AND A.CNO = B.CNO
AND A.FNO = B.FNO
AND A.ACTIVE = 'Y'
Primary key is defied over combination of c_date,iid,active.
Edited by: 1009236 on Jun 1, 2013 12:52 AM

>
SELECT A.CNO AS CNO,
        A.FNO AS FNO,
        A.CID AS CID,
        A.IID AS IID
FROM    CAC_LKP A,
                        SELECT C_DATE,
                                CNO,
                                FNO
                        FROM
                            SELECT MAX(CAC_LKP.C_DATE) AS C_DATE,
                                    CAC_LKP.CNO AS CNO,
                                    CAC_LKP.FNO AS FNO
                            FROM CAC_LKP
                            WHERE ACTIVE = 'Y'
                            GROUP BY CNO, FNO
                    ) B
WHERE   A.C_DATE = B.C_DATE     AND
        A.CNO = B.CNO           AND
        A.FNO = B.FNO           AND
        A.ACTIVE = 'Y';Hi,
Before even starting to see why there is a performance problem, I think you should consider the fact that there is logical problem in your WHERE clause. According to what you mentioned the primary key is composed of *(c_date, iid, active)* yet iid is absent in both the global query's WHERE clause and also that of the subquery.
Consequently the (aggregate) rows in the subquery will not be linked based on a correct logic to the external query.
Regards,
Dariyoosh

Oracle 10g vs Oracle 11g query performance

Hi everyone,
We are moving from Oracle 10g to Oracle 11g database.
I have a query which in Oracle 1g takes 85 seconds to run, but when I run the same query in Oracle 11g database, it takes 635 seconds.
I have confirmed that all indexes on tables involved are enabled.
Does anyone have any pointers, what should I look into. I have compared explain plans and clearly they are different. Oracle 11g is taking a different approach than Oracle 1g.
Thanks

Pl post details of OS versions, exact database versions (to 4 digits) and init.ora parameters of the 10g and 11g databases. Have statistics been gathered after the upgrade ?
For posting tuning requests, pl see these threads
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
When your query takes too long ...
Pl see if the SQL Performance Analyzer can help - MOS Doc 562899.1 (TESTING SQL PERFORMANCE IMPACT OF AN ORACLE 9i TO ORACLE DATABASE 10g RELEASE 2 UPGRADE WITH SQL PERFORMANCE ANALYZER)
HTH
Srini

Oracle 11G - Update is very slow on View

I have big trouble with some Update query on Oracle 11G.
I have a set of tables (5) of identical structures and a view that consists in an UNION ALL of the 5 tables.
None of this table contains more than 20 000 rows.
Let's call the view V_INTE_NE. Each of the basic table has a PRIMARY KEY defined on 3 NUMBERS(10,0) -> INTE_REF / NE_REF / INSTANCE.
Now, I get 6 rows in another table and I want to update my view from the data of this small table (let's call it SMALL). This table has the 3 columns INTE_REF / NE_REF / INSTANCE.
When I try to join the two tables :
SELECT * FROM T_INTE_NE T2
WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM SMALL T1 WHERE T2.INTE_REF = T1.INTEREF AND T2.NE_REF = T1.NEREF AND T2.INTE_INST = T1.INSTANCE )
I get the 6 lines in 0.037 seconds
When I try to update the view (I have an INSTEAD OF trigger that does nothing (just return for testing even without modifying anything), I execute the following query :
UPDATE T_INTE_NE T2
SET INTE_STATE = -11 WHERE
EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM SMALL T1 WHERE T2.INTE_REF = T1.INTEREF AND T2.NE_REF = T1.NEREF AND T2.INTE_INST = T1.INSTANCE )
The 6 rows are updated (at least TRIGGER is called) in 20 seconds.
However, in the execution plan, I can't see where Oracle takes time to achieve the query :
Plan hash value: 907176690
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 6 | 36870 | 153 (1)| 00:00:02 |
| 1 | UPDATE | T_INTE_NE | | | | |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN RIGHT SEMI | | 6 | 36870 | 153 (1)| 00:00:02 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SMALL | 6 | 234 | 9 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | VIEW | T_INTE_NE | 6 | 36636 | 143 (0)| 00:00:02 |
| 5 | VIEW | X_V_T_INTE_NE | 6 | 18636 | 143 (0)| 00:00:02 |
| 6 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SECNODE1_T_INTE_NE | 1 | 3106 | 60 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SECNODE2_T_INTE_NE | 1 | 3106 | 60 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SECNODE3_T_INTE_NE | 1 | 3106 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SECNODE4_T_INTE_NE | 1 | 3106 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SECNODE5_T_INTE_NE | 1 | 3106 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SYS_T_INTE_NE | 1 | 3106 | 17 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("T2"."INTE_REF"="T1"."INTEREF" AND "T2"."NE_REF"="T1"."NEREF" AND
"T2"."INTE_INST"="T1"."INSTANCE")
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
Statistics
3 user calls
0 physical read total bytes
0 physical write total bytes
0 spare statistic 3
0 commit cleanout failures: cannot pin
0 TBS Extension: bytes extended
0 total number of times SMON posted
0 SMON posted for undo segment recovery
0 SMON posted for dropping temp segment
0 segment prealloc tasks
What could explain the difference ?
I get exactly the same execution plan (when autotrace is ON).
Furthermore, if I try to do the same update on each of the basic tables, I get the rows updated instantaneously.
Is there any reason for avoiding this kind of query ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated :-)
Regards,
Patrick

Sorry for this, I lost myself in conjonctures and I didn't think I would have to explain the whole case.
So, I wrote a small piece of PL/SQL that reproduces the same issue.
It seems that my issue is not due to the UPDATE but to the use of the IN predicate.
As you can see at the end of the script, I try to join the 2 tables using different technics.
The first query is very fast, the second is very slow.
I need the second one if I want to do any update.
DROP TABLE Part1;
DROP TABLE Part2;
DROP TABLE Part3;
DROP TABLE Part4;
CREATE TABLE Part1 ( Key1 NUMBER(10, 0), Key2 NUMBER(10, 0), Key3 NUMBER(10, 0), PartId NUMBER(10, 0) DEFAULT( 1 ) NOT NULL, Data1 VARCHAR2(1000), X_Data2 VARCHAR2(2000) NULL, X_Data3 VARCHAR2(2000) NULL, CONSTRAINT PK_Part1 PRIMARY KEY( Key1, Key2, Key3 ) );
CREATE TABLE Part2 ( Key1 NUMBER(10, 0), Key2 NUMBER(10, 0), Key3 NUMBER(10, 0), PartId NUMBER(10, 0) DEFAULT( 2 ) NOT NULL, Data1 VARCHAR2(1000), X_Data2 VARCHAR2(2000) NULL, X_Data3 VARCHAR2(2000) NULL, CONSTRAINT PK_Part2 PRIMARY KEY( Key1, Key2, Key3 ) );
CREATE TABLE Part3 ( Key1 NUMBER(10, 0), Key2 NUMBER(10, 0), Key3 NUMBER(10, 0), PartId NUMBER(10, 0) DEFAULT( 3 ) NOT NULL, Data1 VARCHAR2(1000), X_Data2 VARCHAR2(2000) NULL, X_Data3 VARCHAR2(2000) NULL, CONSTRAINT PK_Part3 PRIMARY KEY( Key1, Key2, Key3 ) );
CREATE TABLE Part4 ( Key1 NUMBER(10, 0), Key2 NUMBER(10, 0), Key3 NUMBER(10, 0), PartId NUMBER(10, 0) DEFAULT( 4 ) NOT NULL, Data1 VARCHAR2(1000), X_Data2 VARCHAR2(2000) NULL, X_Data3 VARCHAR2(2000) NULL, CONSTRAINT PK_Part4 PRIMARY KEY( Key1, Key2, Key3 ) );
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION Decrypt
x_in IN VARCHAR2
) RETURN VARCHAR2
AS
x_out VARCHAR2(2000);
BEGIN
SELECT REVERSE( x_in ) INTO x_out FROM DUAL;
RETURN ( x_out );
END;
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW AllParts AS
SELECT Key1, Key2, Key3, PartId, Data1, Decrypt( X_Data2 ) AS Data2, Decrypt( X_Data3 ) AS Data3 FROM Part1
UNION ALL
SELECT Key1, Key2, Key3, PartId, Data1, Decrypt( X_Data2 ) AS Data2, Decrypt( X_Data3 ) AS Data3 FROM Part2
UNION ALL
SELECT Key1, Key2, Key3, PartId, Data1, Decrypt( X_Data2 ) AS Data2, Decrypt( X_Data3 ) AS Data3 FROM Part3
UNION ALL
SELECT Key1, Key2, Key3, PartId, Data1, Decrypt( X_Data2 ) AS Data2, Decrypt( X_Data3 ) AS Data3 FROM Part4;
DROP TABLE Small;
CREATE TABLE Small ( Key1 NUMBER(10, 0), Key2 NUMBER(10, 0), Key3 NUMBER(10, 0), Data1 VARCHAR2(1000) );
BEGIN
DECLARE
n_Key NUMBER(10, 0 ) := 0;
BEGIN
WHILE ( n_Key < 50000 )
LOOP
INSERT INTO Part1( Key1, Key2, Key3 )
VALUES( n_Key, FLOOR( n_Key / 10 ), FLOOR( n_Key / 100 ) );
INSERT INTO Part2( Key1, Key2, Key3 )
VALUES( n_Key, FLOOR( n_Key / 10 ), FLOOR( n_Key / 100 ) );
INSERT INTO Part3( Key1, Key2, Key3 )
VALUES( n_Key, FLOOR( n_Key / 10 ), FLOOR( n_Key / 100 ) );
INSERT INTO Part4( Key1, Key2, Key3 )
VALUES( n_Key, FLOOR( n_Key / 10 ), FLOOR( n_Key / 100 ) );
n_Key := n_Key + 1;
END LOOP;
INSERT INTO Small( Key1, Key2, Key3, Data1 ) VALUES ( 1000, 100, 10, 'Test 1000' );
INSERT INTO Small( Key1, Key2, Key3, Data1 ) VALUES ( 3000, 300, 30, 'Test 3000' );
INSERT INTO Small( Key1, Key2, Key3, Data1 ) VALUES ( 5000, 500, 50, 'Test 5000' );
COMMIT;
END;
END;
SELECT T2.*
FROM Small T1, AllParts T2
WHERE T2.Key1 = T1.Key1 AND T2.Key2 = T1.Key2 AND T2.Key3 = T1.Key3;
SELECT T1.*
FROM AllParts T1
WHERE ( T1.Key1, T1.Key2, T1.Key3 ) IN ( SELECT T2.Key1, T2.Key2, T2.Key3 FROM Small T2 );

Oracle 11g bug for column ambigously defined error

I have below format query running on Oracle 10g without any issues
select col1
from (select col1
from (select 'A' col1
from dual)
) v1
inner join (select col1 as col2
from (select 'A' col1
from dual)
) v2
on (v1.col1=v2.col2);
When I run the exact same query on Oracle 11g I get column ambiguously defined error. But when I change the query to as below it works fine on 11g
select v1.col1
from (select col1
from (select 'A' col1
from dual)
) v1
inner join (select col1 as col2
from (select 'A' col1
from dual)
) v2
on (v1.col1=v2.col2);
Is it because 11g ignores column alias in my inner queries.

I'd tend to agree that this seems to be a bug in 11.1.0.7 (at least, that's the version I'm running it in)
It's not even that Oracle doesn't know about the column aliases, you can remove the aliases in the ON without a problem, i.e.
SELECT v1.col1
   FROM
(SELECT col1 FROM
    (SELECT 'A' col1 FROM dual
) v1
INNER JOIN
(SELECT col1 AS col2 FROM
    (SELECT 'A' col1 FROM dual
) v2
     ON (col1=col2);works fine. Using the old join syntax also seems to work fine
SELECT col1
   FROM
(SELECT col1 FROM
    (SELECT 'A' col1 FROM dual
) v1,
(SELECT col1 AS col2 FROM
    (SELECT 'A' col1 FROM dual
) v2
WHERE (col1=col2);So it appears that something in the SQL 99 parser is broken. Have you logged a bug in Metalink?
Justin

Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3

Hi All,
I have a query regarding Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3.
Does the Oracle 11g R1/R2 Active Data guard feature supported with SAP R3?
I appreciate your help to provide any link or document for the same.
Thanks,
Vihang

I have a query regarding Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3.
Does the Oracle 11g R1/R2 Active Data guard feature supported with SAP R3?
I appreciate your help to provide any link or document for the same.
Oracle database 11g functionality certified by SAP, check below link
http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/sap/oradb11g-article-upd-1-323074.pdf
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/osb-11gr1certmatrix.xls

SQL performance slow -- oracle 10g to oracle 11g

Hi,
We are have two development server, here we can call server10 and server11.
Server’s having same hardware and OS, but different oracle version, server 10 and server 11 having oracle 10g and oracle 11g respectively.
Problem, when you run sql query in oracle 11g it’s very slow compare to oracle 10g server.
Here I have checked
1)     sga size – comparatively 11g size is big
2)     no full table scan
OS – SUN
DB: 11.1.0.7.0, 10.2.0.4.0

mmee wrote:
Hi,
We are have two development server, here we can call server10 and server11.
Server’s having same hardware and OS, but different oracle version, server 10 and server 11 having oracle 10g and oracle 11g respectively.
Problem, when you run sql query in oracle 11g it’s very slow compare to oracle 10g server.
Here I have checked
1)     sga size – comparatively 11g size is big
2)     no full table scan
OS – SUN
DB: 11.1.0.7.0, 10.2.0.4.0If the query is running slow, the sga size should not be the first thing to check. PLease post the execution plans of the queries from both the servers. Please try to post the tkprof output of the trace of both. The reason for this that explain plan may lie to us about what has happened but trace would be the real picture only.
HTH
Aman....
PS: Don't forget to use the code tag and using the Preview tab to see how the code looks. A better formatted post would most likely get better attention and response.

Oracle 11g Logical Standby not Replicating Security?

Hello,
I found that our Oracle 11g logical standby database stopped replicating security commands anymore since it was created as a Oracle 11g database. The security commands are related to users, roles and profiles such as create/alter/drop user, etc. The 11g logical standby database has no problem replicating other commands. Is this normal change with Oracle 11g logical standby? I know Oracle 10g logical standby can replicate those commands. The Oracle 11g logical standby was created the same way as Oracle 10g logical standby. We don't skip security commands on purpose. Anyone who got Oracle 11g logical standby has the same issue? We would like logical standby database to be able to replicate security. If it is normal for Oracle 11g logical standby to stop replicating security, is there a way to make Oracle 11g logical standby still replicates security?
Thanks!

had you started apply using this syntax
real time apply
alter database start logical standby apply immediate;
check lag:
alter session set nls_date_format='dd/mm hh24:mi';
select newest_time || chr(22)|| newest_scn||chr(10)||applied_time||chr(22)||applied_scn||chr(13)||chr(16)||(newest_scn-applied_scn) lag from dba_logstdby_progress
/

Oracle 11g native web services

Is there any formal explanation about how to configure and create Oracle 11g native web services and how to correctly secure these services? Since Oracle APEX now supports consumption of SOAP and REST web services, it makes sense to have more explanation about creating and securing web services. As many PL/SQL programmers know, it is always not an easy job to develop web services in jDeveloper to work with databases - with all those add-on technologies like jPublisher/Toplink to get tiny things work. It is not easy to find the "how-to" guide about creating and securing Oracle 11g native web services.
Thanks.
Andy

Thanks for the link Tim...it is very useful. I was told that, in APEX 4.2, it will become able to create RESTful web services through APEX - if you run APEX through APEX Listener - by using resource templates in APEX Listener. I will wait for more information about this feature to come out.
Thanks.
Andy

Create query in Oracle 11g

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for