Creation of multiple connectors if we have backend systems with multiple

Hi All,
If I have 5 backend systems with 2 clients each.
Do I need to create UWL connector for each client.
Regards
Suneel

Hi,
You have to create a connector for each system alias. So if you have a backend with 2 clients and you want to retrieve work items from both clients you will have to create 2 systems (and 2 aliases) and 2 UWL connectors.
Regards,
Pierre

Similar Messages

Connect to a backend system with the BI connector via Visual Composer

Hi all,
I set up a system landscape on my notebook with the NW2004s ABAP as NSP and with the NW2004s JAVA SP7 as J2E. Both systems are integrated in the SLD, this is set up. Furthermore I installed a BI system alias as NSP_XMLA in the portal with the URL for the backend system: http://localhost:8000/sap/bw/xml/soap/xmla.
I have the same user on portal and backend system NSP. Both have admin previleges.
When I try to logon to the backend system with this URL I get this error:
"No switch to HTTPS occurred, so it is not secure to send a password"
" Choose "Logon" to continue A dialog box appears in which you can enter your user and password"
Then I can logon to the server and get a lot of XML.
But I have to manually logon to the system.
From the portal I cannot logon to the backend system with the test function. I get the error:
Alias is found, but connection failed.
I guess there must be an automatic logon preconfigured.
How can I do this?
Is SSO necessary?
thanks for any help

Hi Gregor,
thanks for your answer, which was intersting but could not solve the problem. In the meantime I discoverd the reason for it.
You have to insert the connection URL to the BW system at 2 points in the system.
1. You have to configure the XMLA connector with the Visual Administrator.
2. You must implement a system in the portal where you configure all necessary information, also the URL to the BW system.
This seems somewhat strange to me because you will then not be able to connect with two or more BW systems to the portal and VC what is centainly necessary in a real world scenario. Anyway I can now see all Infoproviders of the BW system in the VC, and SSO isn't necessary because you configure the information to login to the BW system directly in the configuration of the XMLA connector in Visual Administrator.

Backend System with Release 701 are not supported

SRM 5.0
Extended Classic Scenario
CCM 2.0
When updating the vendors in SRM system using TC - BBPUPDVD getting the below error message :-
Backend System with Release 701 are not supported
Have checked in table - BBP_BACKEND_DEST, the backend entry is properly maintained.
Can any one advice.
Regards,
Jayoti
Edited by: SAP jayoti on Dec 7, 2010 1:11 PM

The problem is resolved for vendor relication after applying the below notes 1313972 and 1372175.
ECC sandbox seems to be in 701 release. When the backend system ECC is in release 701, vendor replication fails with the error message that 'Backend system release 701 not supported'. We need to apply notes 1313972 and 1372175 to fix this issue. I have applied them in Sandbox and the issue is resolved now.

BBPGETVD - error:backend systems with release 700 are not supported

Hi,
When I am trying to replicate vendor data from EEC to crm 4.0 via BBPGETVD.
I get the error message"backend systems with release 700 are not supported"
Is anyone have Idea what is wrong? and how can fix it?
Thanks,
Rachel

Yossi,
I believe that standard transaction does not work with ECC 6.0. The standard response would be to upgrade your CRM system to 5.0 so that you can download vendors from ECC 6.0.
Bascially the vendor replication programs in CRM below 5.0 aren't really that reliable for delta downloads(one error will cause an entire load to fail). So you probably at best should copy the SAP standards to generate custom load programs as a starting point.
It is not too difficult and overcomes some of the restrictions that SAP puts in place(i.e. you can only use one number range for vendors downloaded, etc.). This is definitely one of the weak points of CRM 4.0 that was fixed in CRM 5.0.
If you have more questions on this let me know.
Take care,
Stephen

"Backend systems with Release 701 are not supported " - ECC 6.0 to SRM 5.0

Hi ,
I have 2 doubts .
1. We are getting Error "Backend systems with Release 701 are not supported " while replicating vendors from ECC 6.0 backend system to SRM 5.0 system.
There are some notes on simillar topic but are not for SRM 5.0 ,suggested on SDN. an anyone please suggest what need to be done for the same.
2. Can we replicate Vendor Master Data with Contact Person from SRM to ECC system ? if yes, How ?
Regards
Narendra

answer 1:-
Note 1372175 - BBP_VENDOR_GET_DATA_JOB "Back-End Systems Not Supported"
On recent upgrade of the ECC back-end system to release '701' the program BBP_VENDOR_GET_DATA_JOB is getting errored out. If you are using SRM 5.0 , SRM_SERVER 550 with ECC backend Release 701 you encounter the above reported problem
Other terms
Vendor Replication Job, Release 701, Backend not supported, BBP_VENDOR_GET_DATA_JOB
Reason and Prerequisites
The program does not consider the release 701
remote_release EQ '700' OR remote_release EQ '701'.
OR
bbp_vendor_get_data - DEBUG what ois the remote_release 700 or 701?
Muhtu

BBPGETVD throwing an error -Backend system with release 701 are not support

Experts,
After changing the Backend connection from R3 4.6c to ECC6 sysem in our BBPCRM4.0,
the transaction "BBPGETVD" is not working, which is throwing an error as
"Backend system with release 701 are not supported".
Already we have applied some of the notes (822883 &862290)
Thanks
Ahamed

Are you able to replicate other data like plants, product categories from the same backend system or are you facing the same error?
Also please check the logical system and see if they are assigned to the client correctly. (in SPRO settings)
Thanks,
Prashanth

'Backend systems with Release 701 are not supported'

while BBPGETVD transaction is run below error is seen,
'Backend systems with Release 701 are not supported'
Please help to resolve it.

Hi
What is your backend system ECC version?
What is the configuaration in Define back end system?
Note 1313972 - BBPGETVD: Backend system latest release not supported
br
muthu

I have 3 systems with the same issue (BSDOD) Event ID 41

I have 3 systems with the same issue that 1 to 4 times a day it crashes. This is on a VM complex running Win2K8 SR2.
I say many Symbol search path issues and fixed that on the system that can see internet (others are behind BSO Firewall)
Now I am down to the last issue with this first server W2K8.
If anyone cal help me it would really make my day...............
************* Symbol Path validation summary **************
Response                         Time (ms)     Location
OK
C:\Windows\Minidump
0: kd> !analyze -v
*                        Bugcheck Analysis
DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (d1)
An attempt was made to access a pageable (or completely invalid) address at an
interrupt request level (IRQL) that is too high. This is usually
caused by drivers using improper addresses.
If kernel debugger is available get stack backtrace.
Arguments:
Arg1: fffffa7f0ee7a410, memory referenced
Arg2: 0000000000000002, IRQL
Arg3: 0000000000000000, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation
Arg4: fffff88000e0b9ec, address which referenced memory
Debugging Details:
READ_ADDRESS: fffffa7f0ee7a410
CURRENT_IRQL: 2
FAULTING_IP:
NETIO!FreeMatchBufListInternal+1c
fffff880`00e0b9ec 488b5910        mov     rbx,qword ptr [rcx+10h]
DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: WIN7_DRIVER_FAULT
BUGCHECK_STR: 0xD1
PROCESS_NAME: System
ANALYSIS_VERSION: 6.3.9600.17237 (debuggers(dbg).140716-0327) amd64fre
TRAP_FRAME: fffff880021d8990 -- (.trap 0xfffff880021d8990)
NOTE: The trap frame does not contain all registers.
Some register values may be zeroed or incorrect.
rax=0000000000000000 rbx=0000000000000000 rcx=fffffa7f0ee7a400
rdx=0000000000000002 rsi=0000000000000000 rdi=0000000000000000
rip=fffff88000e0b9ec rsp=fffff880021d8b20 rbp=fffffa800cd199b8
r8=00000000000017e8 r9=00000000000000d0 r10=fffff80001603000
r11=0000000000000099 r12=0000000000000000 r13=0000000000000000
r14=0000000000000000 r15=0000000000000000
iopl=0         nv up ei ng nz na po nc
NETIO!FreeMatchBufListInternal+0x1c:
fffff880`00e0b9ec 488b5910        mov     rbx,qword ptr [rcx+10h] ds:fffffa7f`0ee7a410=????????????????
Resetting default scope
LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff80001678169 to fffff80001678bc0
STACK_TEXT:
fffff880`021d8848 fffff800`01678169 : 00000000`0000000a fffffa7f`0ee7a410 00000000`00000002 00000000`00000000 : nt!KeBugCheckEx
fffff880`021d8850 fffff800`01676de0 : fffffa80`0d6cdc50 fffff880`010d8ba0 00000000`00000000 fffffa80`0ec7a170 : nt!KiBugCheckDispatch+0x69
fffff880`021d8990 fffff880`00e0b9ec : fffffa80`0f173cf0 fffffa80`0cd199b8 00000000`48706657 fffffa80`0cd199b8 : nt!KiPageFault+0x260
fffff880`021d8b20 fffff880`00e150f3 : fffffa80`0ec7a170 fffffa80`0cd199b8 00000000`00000011 fffffa80`0cd199b8 : NETIO!FreeMatchBufListInternal+0x1c
fffff880`021d8b50 fffff880`00e13f9d : fffffa80`0ec7a190 00000000`00000000 fffff880`021d8c30 fffff880`00e9273f : NETIO!FreeCacheEntry+0xa3
fffff880`021d8b90 fffff880`00e15176 : fffff880`021d8c30 00000000`00000000 fffffa80`0cd82660 fffffa80`0cd199b8 : NETIO!FreeSomeCacheBucketEntries+0x6d
fffff880`021d8be0 fffff880`00e1e221 : 00000000`0000000c fffffa80`0cd82660 fffffa80`0c020004 fffffa80`0cd82660 : NETIO!FreeSomeCacheEntries+0x36
fffff880`021d8c10 fffff880`00e073de : fffffa80`0f000003 fffffa80`0f173cf0 fffffa80`0cd82660 fffffa80`0f173cf0 : NETIO! ?? ::FNODOBFM::`string'+0x7a46
fffff880`021d8c50 fffff800`0196fc93 : 00000000`00000001 00000000`00000001 fffffa80`0f173cf0 fffffa80`0cd82660 : NETIO!TickWorker+0xe
fffff880`021d8c80 fffff800`01682261 : fffff800`0181e200 fffff800`0196fc01 fffffa80`0cd82600 fffff800`0181e2d8 : nt!IopProcessWorkItem+0x23
fffff880`021d8cb0 fffff800`0191473a : 498b4809`75c43b41 fffffa80`0cd82660 00000000`00000080 fffffa80`0cd78740 : nt!ExpWorkerThread+0x111
fffff880`021d8d40 fffff800`016698e6 : fffff880`0205d180 fffffa80`0cd82660 fffffa80`0cd83660 ffffff33`e9ed75cd : nt!PspSystemThreadStartup+0x5a
fffff880`021d8d80 00000000`00000000 : fffff880`021d9000 fffff880`021d3000 fffff880`021d89e0 00000000`00000000 : nt!KxStartSystemThread+0x16
STACK_COMMAND: kb
FOLLOWUP_IP:
NETIO!FreeMatchBufListInternal+1c
fffff880`00e0b9ec 488b5910        mov     rbx,qword ptr [rcx+10h]
SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 3
SYMBOL_NAME: NETIO!FreeMatchBufListInternal+1c
FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner
MODULE_NAME: NETIO
IMAGE_NAME: NETIO.SYS
DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 5294760d
FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: X64_0xD1_NETIO!FreeMatchBufListInternal+1c
BUCKET_ID: X64_0xD1_NETIO!FreeMatchBufListInternal+1c
ANALYSIS_SOURCE: KM
FAILURE_ID_HASH_STRING: km:x64_0xd1_netio!freematchbuflistinternal+1c
FAILURE_ID_HASH: {4f4b2cba-a197-a425-b97a-8f7cbfbac87f}
Followup: MachineOwner

GWD
This does not surprise me at all. These were/are related to your Symantec. IMHO it is bloatware and after doing 10,000+ BSODS I have seem it more than any other malware app I would remove it and use MSE in its place
Symantec is a frequent cause of BSOD's.
I would remove and replace it with Microsoft Security Essentials AT LEAST TO TEST
http://us.norton.com/support/kb/web_view.jsp?wv_type=public_web&docurl=20080710133834EN
http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/
For Norton 360 use this http://symantec.pcperformancetools.com/norton-360-how-to-uninstall.html
Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 6.3.9600.17237 AMD64
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Loading Dump File [C:\Users\Ken\Desktop\Minidump\102714-47923-01.dmp]
Mini Kernel Dump File: Only registers and stack trace are available
************* Symbol Path validation summary **************
Response Time (ms) Location
Deferred SRV*D:\symbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols
Symbol search path is: SRV*D:\symbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols
Executable search path is:
Windows 7 Kernel Version 7601 (Service Pack 1) MP (4 procs) Free x64
Product: Server, suite: Enterprise TerminalServer SingleUserTS
Built by: 7601.18526.amd64fre.win7sp1_gdr.140706-1506
Machine Name:
Kernel base = 0xfffff800`0165e000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0xfffff800`018a1890
Debug session time: Mon Oct 27 05:05:39.635 2014 (UTC - 4:00)
System Uptime: 1 days 4:50:11.507
Loading Kernel Symbols
Loading User Symbols
Loading unloaded module list
* Bugcheck Analysis *
Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information.
BugCheck C5, {8, 2, 1, fffff80001808147}
*** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for SYMEFA64.SYS
*** ERROR: Module load completed but symbols could not be loaded for SYMEFA64.SYS
Probably caused by : SYMEFA64.SYS ( SYMEFA64+27c5 )
Followup: MachineOwner
0: kd> !analyze -v
* Bugcheck Analysis *
DRIVER_CORRUPTED_EXPOOL (c5)
An attempt was made to access a pageable (or completely invalid) address at an
interrupt request level (IRQL) that is too high. This is
caused by drivers that have corrupted the system pool. Run the driver
verifier against any new (or suspect) drivers, and if that doesn't turn up
the culprit, then use gflags to enable special pool.
Arguments:
Arg1: 0000000000000008, memory referenced
Arg2: 0000000000000002, IRQL
Arg3: 0000000000000001, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation
Arg4: fffff80001808147, address which referenced memory
Debugging Details:
BUGCHECK_STR: 0xC5_2
CURRENT_IRQL: 2
FAULTING_IP:
nt!ExAllocatePoolWithTag+537
fffff800`01808147 48895808 mov qword ptr [rax+8],rbx
CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1
DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: WIN7_DRIVER_FAULT_SERVER
PROCESS_NAME: ccSvcHst.exe
ANALYSIS_VERSION: 6.3.9600.17237 (debuggers(dbg).140716-0327) amd64fre
TRAP_FRAME: fffff880069f9580 -- (.trap 0xfffff880069f9580)
NOTE: The trap frame does not contain all registers.
Some register values may be zeroed or incorrect.
rax=0000000000000000 rbx=0000000000000000 rcx=fffffa800f880f60
rdx=0000000000000000 rsi=0000000000000000 rdi=0000000000000000
rip=fffff80001808147 rsp=fffff880069f9710 rbp=0000000000001000
r8=0000000000000000 r9=fffff80001863770 r10=fffff80001863588
r11=0000000000000000 r12=0000000000000000 r13=0000000000000000
r14=0000000000000000 r15=0000000000000000
iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na po nc
nt!ExAllocatePoolWithTag+0x537:
fffff800`01808147 48895808 mov qword ptr [rax+8],rbx ds:00000000`00000008=????????????????
Resetting default scope
LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff800016d3169 to fffff800016d3bc0
STACK_TEXT:
fffff880`069f9438 fffff800`016d3169 : 00000000`0000000a 00000000`00000008 00000000`00000002 00000000`00000001 : nt!KeBugCheckEx
fffff880`069f9440 fffff800`016d1de0 : fffff880`069f9690 fffffa80`0d157d80 fffff880`069f9500 fffff800`01863770 : nt!KiBugCheckDispatch+0x69
fffff880`069f9580 fffff800`01808147 : fffff8a0`078d3140 00000000`00000702 fffffa80`0f95c800 fffff8a0`078d33a8 : nt!KiPageFault+0x260
fffff880`069f9710 fffff880`016bf7c5 : fffff880`00000000 00000000`00000000 fffffa80`0ddc6530 fffff880`00000000 : nt!ExAllocatePoolWithTag+0x537
fffff880`069f9800 fffff880`00000000 : 00000000`00000000 fffffa80`0ddc6530 fffff880`00000000 00000000`00000000 : SYMEFA64+0x27c5
fffff880`069f9808 00000000`00000000 : fffffa80`0ddc6530 fffff880`00000000 00000000`00000000 fffff880`016bf514 : 0xfffff880`00000000
STACK_COMMAND: kb
FOLLOWUP_IP:
SYMEFA64+27c5
fffff880`016bf7c5 ?? ???
SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 4
SYMBOL_NAME: SYMEFA64+27c5
FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner
MODULE_NAME: SYMEFA64
IMAGE_NAME: SYMEFA64.SYS
DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 530fcaf7
FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: X64_0xC5_2_SYMEFA64+27c5
BUCKET_ID: X64_0xC5_2_SYMEFA64+27c5
ANALYSIS_SOURCE: KM
FAILURE_ID_HASH_STRING: km:x64_0xc5_2_symefa64+27c5
FAILURE_ID_HASH: {c40fe135-4c88-ce5c-c7b0-361d3927c5c6}
Followup: MachineOwner
Wanikiya and Dyami--Team Zigzag

Hallo, i have a problem with the intallation about after effects. I have a mac 10.6.8 and they told me I can't installete it because i don't have a system with 64 bit. how can i do? someone told me i can .. but i don't know how. thank you

hallo, i have a problem with the intallation about after effects. I have a mac 10.6.8 and they told me I can't installete it because i don't have a system with 64 bit. how can i do? someone told me i can .. but i don't know how. thank you

You cannot. If someone else told you there is a way then they will need to show you. After Effects requires a 64-bit system and the latest release requires Mac OS X v10.8 or v10.9 minimum

Am getting message saying something is trying to upload unsecure update for Firefox. Have scanned system with Avast but no reported problems

During a browsing session looking for spares for garden machinery I got a message saying something was trying to upload an unsecure update to Firefox. Have scanned system with Avast and a couple of other malware programs but have no reported threats. As far as I am aware my browser is fully up to date.

This issue can be caused by the presence of leftover files in the Firefox program folder (defaults\pref) like a file firefox.js that overrides the update URL with a wrong link.<br />
Do a clean reinstall and be sure to remove the Firefox program folder.<br />
See also:
* [/questions/826858]
Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 5.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
* Uninstall your current Firefox version.
* Do not remove personal data when you uninstall the current version.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
* It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Firefox Profile Folder] and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.

User cannot connect to backend system with user J2EE_ADMIN.

I am using Rapid Installer to initiate the second part of the installtion "ERP 6.0 EhP 3 Self-Service Scenarios and Automatic Roles". When I get to the J2EE User section to enter the parameters, the user is defaulted to "Administrator" and I enter my password. I click next and get this message "User cannot connect to backend system with user J2EE_ADMIN." Any ideas?

If this is a double stack installation, you need to enter J2EE_ADMIN as user, NOT administrator.
Markus

How to set up backend system with Service Group

Where can I set up the backend system configuration for a Service Group in the Services Registry?
Or does it have to be done in the NWA? If so, where in the NWA?
Regards,
Puja

Hi,
you can configure this in the NWA using the SOA Management workset. Have a look at the following [page|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce711/helpdata/en/a1/9e09c81efa4b2ba92de3f465e305f3/frameset.htm] in the pre-release documentation for more information.
Hope that helps!

Connecting to backend system with parameters

Hi,
i am able to get connected to bakend system with sytem number, portno, sid, host or ip... and can get transcation ivews with that...
ex: i am able to see perticular SAP R3 Transactional iview with these parameters
Then what is the purpose of creating RFC destinations, go.bat configuration, certificate creation and all those things.....
Thanks
Kumar.

Hi Kumar,
This things are needed when you want to access any service from R3 to Portal or vice versa. Like <b>Adobe Document Service (ADS)...</b>It should be installed in Portal server..and if you want to use ADS for displaying/printing R3 form in pdf format then you need to access ADS from Portal. For this type of case you need only the creation of RFC destination, go.bat configuration for HTTP destination, certificate..etc..
Thanks,
Sekhar

Install GRC AC 5.3 RTAl in a backend system. (VIRSA) up on VIRSA 400_700

Hi Supports,
I want to install GRC AC 5.3 RTAl in a backend system. (VIRSA)
Where we have below setups already. We have a NW 2004 server with GRC 5.3 Installed and SLD is configured. Now we need to install GRC AC 5.3 RTA in Backend systems, so that we connect the backend system with the GRC server (NW 2004).
The backend system has ECC6.0 + Oralce 10g in AIX 5.3. This system is upgraded from 4.6c to ECC 6.0 recently.
We have already VIRSA 400_700 release in this system. Now we need to install GRC AC 5.3 RTA upon this for configure newer version of VIRSA (GRC).
Now here my quaries ??
1) When we install GRC 5.3 RTA in this system then it over write the existing VIRSA 400_700 release or installed in separate ??
2) We plan to take hole system backup before the installation. Including this we need to take backup of the existing VIRSA 400_700 release. Then what are the things i need to take backup and how ?? (tables of VIRSA backup only how ??)
3)Any one have the RTA installation procedure please forward it ??
4) After installation how can i sure that install is success or not ?? how can i check ??
5) What are configuration settings for NW 2004 server and Backend system after installation require(Procedure) ??
And i request to the guys to post the procedures/process is best way to share knowledge global.
Advance thanks for your replies,
Thanks & Regards,
Jagadish

Hi
> 1) When we install GRC 5.3 RTA in this system then it over write the existing VIRSA 400_700 release or installed in separate ??
> 2) We plan to take hole system backup before the installation. Including this we need to take backup of the existing VIRSA 400_700 release. Then what are the things i need to take backup and how ?? (tables of VIRSA backup only how ??)
> 3)Any one have the RTA installation procedure please forward it ??
> 4) After installation how can i sure that install is success or not ?? how can i check ??
> 5) What are configuration settings for NW 2004 server and Backend system after installation require(Procedure) ??
For GRC 5.3 check below SAP note
1250521 GRC/Virsa Add-On Upgrade Best Practice
SAP Note 1006083 - Virsa Access Control Suite- STMS to SAINT Migration
Also check GRC upgrade guide.
Thanks
Sunny

How to install ABAP as a backend system in my EHP1

I have successfully installed EHP1 composition enviornment from SDN , now i m able to work on
NWDS for JAVA and Enterprise portal . it contains java application server .
but in order to get data from ABAP Backend system from NWDS(JAVA) , I don't have ABAP Backend sysytem , how to install abap backend system with abap application server in my system ????
there is one link to install Netwaever ABAP 7.1 trial version( webdynpro abap and abap application server ) in sdn but in system requirement it clearly mentioned that " make sure that there is no SAP sysytem installed in ur system " .
I need webdynpro java ,webdynpro abap and enterprise portal together but i have only webdynpro java and EP , so how to install abap as a backend system in my EHP1 ?
or any other download link which contain all three ??
please help me ?

Hi,
CE is indeed not double stack. However, it is possible to install both an ABAP and a CE on the same host provided they have different system ids and instance numbers. This works for the current SDN download versions: CE 7.1 and CE 7.1.1 (system id CE1, system number 00) and AS ABAP 7.01 (system id NSP, system number 02).
Needless to say, it is perfectly possible to configure and establish all kinds of connections between the two:
JCo/RFC calls in both directions
Web Service calls in both directions
AS ABAP as a portal backend
publishing system information in SLD
accessing an ESR
accessing a Service Registry (publish + query)
using AS ABAP as user database for the CE
Single Sign-On
Best regards,
Thorsten

Creation of multiple connectors if we have backend systems with multiple

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for