Creation of one inspection lot for more than 1physical sample

hello SAP,
we have one common question.I have created 3 physical sample 20000006,2000007,2000008 and now i want to create one inspection lot for these 3 physical sample through QPR5 Transaction but system is generating each inspection lot for each physical sample which is wrong process. this is common scenario for most of the industry.SO please clarify and provide the solution

Hi,
I hope this solution gives some way out for you to solve your problem . I assume the sample is for  the same material , phy. sample type and category
Create a new physical-sample drawing with refernce to :
Using this function, you can create a new physical-sample drawing (with one or more physical samples) that references:
An inspection lot
A production order or process order
A production version
You use this function to create physical samples that have not been planned in a sample-drawing procedure and which you can draw from a production process according to your specific needs. In an inspection during production, for example, you can draw physical samples from the process on the basis of time or quantity (for example, a physical sample every three hours or for every 1000 liters of material produced). You can freely specify the inspection-relevant operations in which you want to inspect the physical samples for the new physical-sample drawing.
please do let us know wether you were able to create one inspection lot .Or else please ellaborate the question step wise t-code and functions Will try to find a solution .
cheers
kp
source of information : SAP

Similar Messages

  • One inspection lot for multiple materials of purchase order line items

    Hi All,
    My client requirement is one inspection lot for multiple materials of purchase order line items.
    Please share your thoughts.
    Thanks in advance for early reply.
    Regards,
    Jishu

    I totally agree with Amol.
    I don't think I would touch that development nor would I ever tell a client it could reliably be done through development.
    Knowing what I know about the table structures, I don't think you could create any development for this that could use a significant amount of the existing tables and functionality.  I think you'd have to create all your own Z tables and basically rebuild the functionality.  Tying it back in with SAP data will be difficult.
    You're even looking at all custom screens for your results recording and UD as well.  And if you have follow-on functions like batch classification requirements, batch determination, COA publication, results copy functions, use of DMR and sampling procedures, physical samples, quality notifications, etc. etc.. you could be looking a whole lot of development.
    Craig

  • GRN With 2line items(material,batch same)one inspection lot for 2line items

    Dear Experts
    As and when we make a GRN with 2 line items and same batch number we enter no. of containers differently but only the number from the first line item is flowing into the Inspection lot origin.We are creating only one inspection lot for 2 line items as the batch number is same for the items.
    1. In material master i have given 01 inspection type ( with control inslot.. Each material document,batch, storage location) :---
    this is the reason system is creating only one inspection lot.
    i am entering manually same batch number for 2line items...
    Here my problem is ... while giving UD... SYSTEM IS PICKING ONLY FIRST LINE ITEM NO.OF CONTAINER... IT HAS TO BE BOTH LINE ITEMS CONTAINERS.... IT IS PICKING BOTH LINE ITEMS QUANTITY... NO.CONTAINER ONLY IT IS NOT PICKING....
    Waitting for  experts reply

    Hi,
    As per your query if you put in MM forums then you will get the reply immly.
    Anil

  • Enhancement-One inspection lot for early lot and serial profile

    Hi,
    I have a requirement shown below.
    Can anyone guide me to proceed this Enhancement from the start?
    Inspection lot for production order is created at production order release, when the finished good has a serialnumber profile assigned in the materials master and the serialnumbers are captured in the handling unit assigned to the production order, the system will create another inspection lot.
    <i>Required system enhancement:</i>
    Only 1 inspection lot per production order should be generated.
    <b>NB.</b> Without this enhancement both inspection lots created for the production order have to be closed to be able to close the production order.

    Please try with sub-routine: userexit_move_field_to_lips or userexit_save_document of include: MV50AFZ1.
    I guess clearing LIPS-QPLOS for specific conditions would do the trick for you..
    <b>Reward points</b>
    Regards

  • Inspection results for more than one lot

    How do i see inspection results for different lots of the same material together in a single screen. Is there any standard report or query available in SAP?
    Prahlad

    Dear Prahlad
    You can see it in ways
    1) Go to QS28. Input the plant and the mic and execute. You will get MIC details. Choose the MIC and click on Result history. A pop will appear Result history Limit Selection. In the Time Tab you can see inspection lot selection date From and To. Execute you will get the entire list of lots
    3) Go to QA33 > result> Select the Mic> go Result historyhistory >In the Time Tab you can see inspection lot selection date From and To. Execute you will get the entire list of lots with all values and charts
    4) standard reports such MCXD,QGP1 can be used
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    gajesh

  • One BIA- Box for more than one BI system ?

    Hello,
    Do you have any experience or detailed documentation about BIA Landscape ?
    My question is
    Must be a 1:1 relationship between the BI system and the BI Accelerator?
    Is it possible connect more than one test systems (non-productive) to one BIA- Box.
    I need some detailed documentation.
    Thanks a lot.

    Hi Devrim,
    Must there be a 1:1 relationship between the BI instance and the BI Accelerator?
    The only supported configuration for productive systems is a 1:1 connection between the BI instance and the BI accelerator. The reason for this is the interdependency between BIA and BI is primarily guaranteeing best performance. In addition, this 1:1 assignment keeps interdependencies (such as synchronized patching, backups etc.) at a minimum.
    For any non-productive systems (less requirements towards high performance and disaster tolerance), you can also connect one BIA box with several BI instances. Note that reorganization or restart of one BIA instance affects the others.
    Regards,
    Anil

  • Using ONE Microsoft account for more than 100 Windows devices

    I developed an application for company customers and it is listed on the windows store now. I need to use only ONE Microsoft e-mail for so many devices for my users. How to log in on all the devices with the same e-mail instead of creating one for each
    user and for each new user?
    Ahmed Abd El-Karim

    When talking about the phone the maximum number of devices on a single account is 5. When it comes to Windows 8.1 on PCs and Tablets it's 88 but you can not use it on more than that.
    If this is intended for company deployment you can do that using sideloading by either getting a sideloading key or joining the devices to a domain or using a company certificate for Windows Phones.
    Deploying it via the Store is not a viable option there.

  • One inspection lot for all GR per day.

    Hi,
    Presently when I am doing GR for a material system generates a inspection lot per GR.But when I am doing GR for same material several times per day system should generate inspect lot once only.or if material belongs to same supplier also it should generate one lot for that day .how to do with dynamic modification rule?  
    manoj

    hi
    1. if same material per day-one lot
    Create a DMR with Reset period 1 day.
    Two stage DMR with First stage : Inspection 1
                                      Second stage: 99 skip reset 1 day.
    Now apply this DMR in task list Header.
    Go to QA16 and set auto UD after Every 30 mins for 01 inspection type.
    Also QCC0->Basic setting>plant level>Insp lot completion>Auto UD-->
    maintain 30 mins here for skip & auto ud
    this will create first lot every day & will come to inspection.
    from second lot all lots will come to QI but stock posting will be done by system.
    2.if same vendor material -one lot
    in QP01>material Assignment>enter vendor material combination  here.
    rest of the things will remain same.
    Regards
    Sujit

  • One Line Item for More than one Ship to Party

    Dear Friends
    In one sales order which has only one Line Items for example P-101 qty-40 pcs. That 40pcs should shipt to my 4 ship-to-party. How I end user to do it. in one Line item in One Sales Order.
    Kindly Regards
    Arun

    Hi Arun,
    First create four ship to party master data which will be having different address.
    Then assign those ship to party in your sold to party master data in the partner tab.
    If you want sent material P-101 to different persons then you have to divide the quantities in the line item like this
    P-101          10
    p-101          10
    p-101          10
    p-101          10
    Now select one line item and click on detail screen.
    After that go to the Partner Tab and change the Ship to Party for that particular item.
    Do this same procedure for other three line item also.
    Try this method it might work.
    Suneet Prakash

  • One inspection lot

    Hi Guru,
    How to create one inspection lot for one production order.
    regards,
    Rakesh Patel

    Hello Rakesh,
    Explore 'early lot creation' option in material master inspection type setting . But will you have single batch per inspection lot ?
    Cheers
    Kaushik

  • Single inspection lot for multiple operation

    Hi
    I am creating a process order having 10 operation. the 3,5 and 8 are quality inspection (inprocess inspection) & last is PP operation that is for final confirmation.
    The control key in quality operations are pi02 and for production operation are pi03.
    i am using insp type 03 in material master
    Curently only one inspection lot is trigerring for all operations hence while RR, all operation are appearing (Quality & production).
    User needs diffirent inspection lots for different quality operation.
    How can i triggere lots per QC operation??
    I would be vary thankful if i get it.
    AYK

    Hi
    Std will create one inspection lot for 1 process order
    and RR will show all operations which is related to inspection
    ask PP guy that cotrol indicator Pi03 - insp. char to be uncheck
    then it will not show those operations not relevant for inspection
    is't fullfill your requirement
    why your business needs individual inspection lot for each operation?
    give info
    Thanks
    Sami

  • I am trying to copy more or less 30G from my MacbookPro to an external hard drive and it is stuck in the "preparing to copy" step. But that for more than one hour. What should I do to make it faster? Thanks a lot in advance!

    I am trying to copy more or less 30G from my MacbookPro to an external hard drive and it is stuck in the "preparing to copy" step. But that for more than one hour. What should I do to make it faster? Thanks a lot in advance!

    Thanks Shootist007, by blockd files I mean files that I have changed to blocked and when I tried to move then for the first time, I had to unblock again. I am trying to backup my pictures, my songs and other files like word documents and excel tables. First I put all of them as blocked, what caused the first problems on trying to move them. Then, I've unchecked the block option and if I try to move one by one, there is no problem. The issue is to move all together, because it gets stuck in the preparing to copy files step. Anyway, if I cannot do all by once, I'll do it one by one, event though that was not suposed to happen if we are talking about technology, right? Anyway, I thank you again for trying to help me!

  • Perform VENDOR EVALUATION for MORE THAN ONE VENDORS at a time

    Hello all,
    Please guide for any process where i can perform Vendor Evaluation for MORE THAN ONE vendors AT A TIME.
    At my location there are around thousand vendors, which are to be evaluated, and difficult to perform the evaluation process one-by-one.
    (ME61/ME62/ME63)
    Detailed replies with various possibilities would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Joy Ghosh

    The vendor evaluation for some thousand vendors at the same time has already been in SAP long before they developed LSMW. The purpose of LSMW is to load data from a legacy system, of course you can (mis-)use it for a lot other things.
    But you should not always use LSMW if you are to lazy to go thru the SAP standard menu to find a transaction like ME6G
    There you define a job that runs RM06LBAT report.
    You first have to define a selection variant for this report. this can be done in SE38 by entering the report name, select variant, clicking display, then entering a name for the variant and clicking Create.

  • [Fwd: Client accessing MBeanHome for more than one domain receives SecurityException]

    Fwd'ing to security newsgroup
    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: Client accessing MBeanHome for more than one domain receives
    SecurityException
    Date: 4 Mar 2004 07:27:33 -0800
    From: Dinesh Bhat <[email protected]>
    Reply-To: Dinesh Bhat <[email protected]>
    Organization: BEA NEWS SITE
    Newsgroups: weblogic.developer.interest.management
    Hi,
    When a client accesses MBeans of more than one domains (Weblogic 8.1)
    that have
    different passwords, it receives a SecurityException. This occurs when
    the MBeanHome
    for each domain is looked up at initialization and reused for each
    request ( to
    access MBeans ). The security exception does not occur if the MBeanHome
    for each
    domain is looked up for each request. On initial review, this behavoir
    seems inconsistent.
    Looking up the MBeanHome for each request may introduce a significant
    overhead.
    I am not sure if concurrent lookups would also cause the same problem.
    I have read on another post that we can work around this problem by
    establishing
    a trust relationship between the servers, but this may not be feasible
    when one
    is monitoring a lot of servers and the overhead of configuration may be
    an issue.
    I have attached code that can reproduce the problem.
    Please advise on the correct approach.
    Thanks
    Dinesh Bhat
    Panacya Inc.
    import java.util.ArrayList;
    import java.util.Set;
    import java.util.HashMap;
    import java.util.Iterator;
    import java.util.Hashtable;
    import javax.management.MBeanServer;
    import javax.naming.Context;
    import weblogic.jndi.Environment;
    import weblogic.management.MBeanHome;
    * This class reproduces the Security Exception that is caused when a client tries to access
    * MBeans of more than one domain with different weblogic passwords. Here is the stacktrace of the
    * exception
    * java.lang.SecurityException: [Security:090398]Invalid Subject: principals=[weblogic, Administrators]
         at weblogic.rjvm.BasicOutboundRequest.sendReceive(BasicOutboundRequest.java:108)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicRemoteRef.invoke(BasicRemoteRef.java:138)
         at weblogic.management.internal.AdminMBeanHomeImpl_811_WLStub.getDomainName(Unknown Source)
         at WLSecurityTest.getWeblogicInfo(WLSecurityTest.java:140)
         at WLSecurityTest.runTest(WLSecurityTest.java:75)
         at WLSecurityTest.<init>(WLSecurityTest.java:66)
         at WLSecurityTest.main(WLSecurityTest.java:51)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
         at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(Unknown Source)
    Caused by: java.lang.SecurityException: [Security:090398]Invalid Subject: principals=[weblogic, Administrators]
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityServiceManager.seal(SecurityServiceManager.java:682)
         at weblogic.rjvm.MsgAbbrevInputStream.getSubject(MsgAbbrevInputStream.java:181)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.acceptRequest(BasicServerRef.java:814)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.dispatch(BasicServerRef.java:299)
         at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatchRequest(RJVMImpl.java:920)
         at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatch(RJVMImpl.java:841)
         at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManagerServer.handleRJVM(ConnectionManagerServer.java:222)
         at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManager.dispatch(ConnectionManager.java:794)
         at weblogic.rjvm.t3.T3JVMConnection.dispatch(T3JVMConnection.java:570)
         at weblogic.socket.NTSocketMuxer.processSockets(NTSocketMuxer.java:105)
         at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:32)
         at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:197)
         at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:170)
    * Note: the exception is caused only when the MBeanHome for each domain is cached and used for subsequent
    * transactions. The exception does not occur if the MBeanHome for each domain is looked up for each transaction. This
    * would significant overhead in practice. Also the transactions across the various domains occurs serially, hence
    * the effect of concurrent lookups has to be tested.
    * Usage:
    * This class has been tested with weblogic 8.1
    * The class needs weblogic.jar in its classpath
    * One can specify the weblogic details as System properties. The properties need to be specified in
    * the following format:
    * wls.host.n, wls.userId.n, wls.password.n where n is the weblogix instance number. Also specify
    * the boolean system property reconnect.each.iteration to toggle between reconnecting or not reconnecting
    * for each iteration. When not reconnecting for each iteration, the MBeanHome is reused and the Security Exception
    * occurs.
    * Following is the example of system properties
    * -Dwls.host.0=localhost:7001 -Dwls.userId.0=weblogic -Dwls.password.0=weblogic
    * -Dwls.host.1=localhost:7011 -Dwls.userId.1=weblogic -Dwls.password.1=weblogic1
    * -Dwls.host.2=localhost:7021 -Dwls.userId.2=weblogic -Dwls.password.2=weblogic2
    * -Dreconnect.each.iteration=false
    public class WLSecurityTest
    ArrayList wlsDetailsList = new ArrayList();
    HashMap connectionMap = new HashMap();
    public static void main(String[] args)
    try
    WLSecurityTest wlSecurityTest = new WLSecurityTest();
    catch (Exception e)
    e.printStackTrace();
    * Constructor
    * @throws Exception
    public WLSecurityTest() throws Exception
    int noOfTries = 10;
    getWLSDetails();
    for( int i=0; i <= noOfTries; i++)
    runTest();
    * Runs the test
    private void runTest()
    for (int i = 0; i < wlsDetailsList.size(); i++)
    WLSDetails wlsDetails = (WLSDetails) wlsDetailsList.get(i);
    getWeblogicInfo(wlsDetails);
    * Get Weblogic details from System properties
    * @throws Exception
    private void getWLSDetails() throws Exception
    wlsDetailsList = new ArrayList();
    String hostKeyTmpl = "wls.host";
    String userIdKeyTmpl = "wls.userId";
    String passwordKeyTmpl = "wls.password";
    boolean done = false;
    for (int i = 0; !done; i++)
    WLSDetails wlsDetails = new WLSDetails();
    String hostKey = hostKeyTmpl + "." + Integer.toString(i);
    String userIdKey = userIdKeyTmpl + "." + Integer.toString(i);
    String passwordKey = passwordKeyTmpl + "." + Integer.toString(i);
    wlsDetails.hostName = System.getProperty(hostKey);
    done = (wlsDetails.hostName == null) || (wlsDetails.hostName.length() == 0);
    if (!done)
    wlsDetails.userId = System.getProperty(userIdKey);
    wlsDetails.password = System.getProperty(passwordKey);
    connect(wlsDetails);
    wlsDetailsList.add(wlsDetails);
    * Lookup the MBeanHome for the specified weblogic server
    * @param wlsDetails
    * @throws Exception
    public synchronized void connect(WLSecurityTest.WLSDetails wlsDetails) throws Exception
    Context ctx = null;
    MBeanHome mbHomeLocal = null;
    try
    Environment env = new Environment();
    env.setProviderUrl("t3://" + wlsDetails.hostName);
    env.setSecurityPrincipal(wlsDetails.userId);
    env.setSecurityCredentials(wlsDetails.password);
    Hashtable hashtable = env.getProperties();
    System.out.println(hashtable.toString());
    ctx = env.getInitialContext();
    wlsDetails._mBeanHome = (MBeanHome) ctx.lookup(MBeanHome.ADMIN_JNDI_NAME);
    catch (Exception e)
    e.printStackTrace();
    * Gets weblogic information using MBeans
    * @param wlsDetails
    public synchronized void getWeblogicInfo(WLSDetails wlsDetails)
    try
    boolean reconnectEachIteration =
    Boolean.getBoolean("reconnect.each.iteration");
    if( (reconnectEachIteration) || ((wlsDetails._mBeanHome == null) && (!reconnectEachIteration) ))
    connect(wlsDetails);
    MBeanHome mbHomeLocal = wlsDetails._mBeanHome;
    String domainName = mbHomeLocal.getDomainName();
    Set allMBeans = mbHomeLocal.getAllMBeans();
    System.out.println("Size: " + allMBeans.size());
    Set clusterMBeans = mbHomeLocal.getMBeansByType("Cluster", domainName);
    System.out.println(clusterMBeans);
    MBeanServer mBeanServer = mbHomeLocal.getMBeanServer();
    catch (Exception ex)
    ex.printStackTrace();
    * Class that holds weblogic server details
    class WLSDetails
    String hostName = "";
    String userId = "";
    String password = "";
    MBeanHome _mBeanHome = null;

    If Server version is 61.
    Make user "system" password of all weblogic servers same.
    If Server version above 61(70,81)
    In the Security Advanced Settings un check generated credential and specify a common credentail for all the weblogic servers(domains).

  • How do people register for more than one person on a form?

    We had a lot of complaints last year from organizations who sent several employees to our training.  It took a long time for them to process these one at a time.  How do people register for more than one person on a form?

    Hi thearcca,
    This entirely depends on the form you create, you can add multiple choice button and ask for the no. of employees the organization wants to register.
    Also, you can add corresponding text field for the names.
    Thanks,
    Vikrantt Singh

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to install java on Mac OSX Lion.

    When getting promted with a "you must download java runtime"-dialogue box, it says I'm not connected to an internet connection when I most certainly are. I've tried every known method for installing java on this OS, all of them prompts me with the sa

  • EXTRACT function and Chinese data

    Hi ! I'm working with PL/SQL web applications, and I'm having trouble viewing it on a webpage when I use EXTRACT function for Chinese data. <abccompany> <department> 凯伦·威廉斯是一家小型社区制药厂的所有者,她正考虑开始提供药方递送的服务,同时也已经就此事征求了保险专家鲍勃·布朗的意见。凯伦询问鲍勃,需要购买哪些保险、</depar

  • No Mp3 Disk on Source List

    I am having trouble with mp3 disk playback. I only found one topic related which was not answered. when I insert a mp3 disk, iTunes doesn't seem to detect it. while it is available as a disk in the Finder, I don't see any reaction from iTunes. obviou

  • How to upgrade to firefox 4

    I am not very computer literate with technical issues. This is Windows XP. I keep getting a message almost daily, to upgrade to Firefox 4. I click on "Download now to upgrade", I then get a box that says "Do you want to save this file or cancel?" I c

  • Classified/Real Estate/Jobs Software

    We developed our own real estate and job listing content management system a long time ago, but now it's really out-of-date and we are looking to buy software for CF that has some bells and whistles included... RSS, mobile, SEO optimized, etc.. Whene