CS6 Sv from Raw to psd gives uppercase extension

Using CS6 from cloud on win7 64 bit (i7 with 8gb ram)
Adding just a note about searching... I used the search bar to search for these:
Uppercase
Lowercase
save Uppercase
I got no good hits (Judging by mostly the subjects and reading a few)
==================================================================
Saving an image from sony A65 raw (*.arw) files using the lower left [Save Image] button on the raw window produces a file with an uppercase PSD extension.
Looking in preferences/file handling, I see it is set to save in lowercase.
How can I make ps actually follow that setting and save with lowercase extension?

I hope I am still not missing the point here. Bear with me, Don. Doesn't this procedure also require that if we already have these duplicte files in the same folder originally that we have to first separate them into separate folders based on extensions, then import them, and then move them all back to a single folder.
If so, that just adds another step and increases the work involved, or have I missed something?
I think the best solution is for Adobe to get out a 1.01 upgrade fixing this and several other very basic but now obvious design flaws before the trials and reduced price expire, or at least annonce that these will be fixed within by a given date--after all, they did set a date for this release and met it, and they have had .01 quick upgrades before.

Similar Messages

  • I just began month trial of cs6 & cannot open raw files from nikon 600?

    I just began month trial of cs6 & cannot open raw files from nikon 600?

    Have you updated your Photoshop to get the latest Camera Raw update patch?  If not go to:
    Help >> Updates
    This should get you the necessary updates for your camera assuming it is not "too recent".
    Good luck and post back.

  • I can't open Sony NEX-5 raw files with PS-CS6 and latest raw converter plug-in 7.1.

    When I try to open raw files from Sony NEX-5 instead of going to PhotoShop like all my NEF files, they go to another software suite that I have (On-One).  I am running MAC OS 10.7.5 with latest PS-CS6 and latest raw converter plug-in 7.1.  On-One seems to hi-jack these Sony raw files and won't give me the opportunity for the adjustments that I get with the Adobe Raw File converter.  Any help??

    Great news!
    Since you have the solution, you might want to see this article: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1058744?tstart=0
    Marking your thread as Answered will be helpful to many.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • Can't import RAW and psd file with same name different extension

    Trying to import a folder of images from desktop that I have been working with in Bridge CS3.
    LR won't import a RAW file that has a PSD file by the same name. Tried renaming the PSD and deleting the one with the same name, but says it is still there and won't import the RAW file - What is the correct workaround on this? Why can't it import same name files with different extensions?

    A forum search for 'RAW + JPEG' will give you more posts on this than you care to read. This will change. For now, import the RAW and PSD's from separate folders and then move them together for within LR.
    LR is seeing the RAW as a sidecar to the PSD. It is an unforseen effect of the RAW + JPEG thing where they decided to not import the JPEG, seeing it as basically a preview image for the RAW.
    LOL
    Don
    Don Ricklin, MacBook 1.83Ghz Duo 2 Core running 10.4.9 & Win XP, Pentax *ist D
    http://donricklin.blogspot.com/

  • I am unable to create an Action to Export from .ai to .psd. The OPEN and EXPORT steps in the Action

    I am unable to create an Action to Export from .ai to .psd.
    The steps in the Action such as Open and Export seem inextricably linked to the file from which the original Action was recorded.
    The steps in the Action do not seem to be generalized commands that I can apply to any folder of .ai files.

    I'd recommend to exactly describe what you're doing. How did you set up your action? Which settings did you choose in the Batch Process dialog? What exactly went wrong? What did you expect instead?
    Whatever issues you're suffering from, there is no way to provide a hasty answer and no way to give an elaborate answer without knowing the details.

  • CS6 Bridge Camera RAW help!!

    I have just installed CS6 direct from the Adobe website on to my MAC as an upgrade to CS5 and it is all fully updated, I have shot some test RAW images on my Canon 1DX and tried to open them in Bridge, it says that the file cannot be opened and that the program needs updating via Help>Updates, this is confusing as it says it is fully updated, I have also checked the file association in CS6 and Canon CR2 is supported. I have not yet un-installed CS5 from my MAC, is it interfering with CS6?.....CR2 files open perfectly in CS5 so I can't see what is causing Bridge in CS6 not to recognise RAW CR2 files and allow me to open them in Camera RAW. Any help really appreciated!

    That camera model has been supported since ACR 8.3 and it is most certainly supported by ACR 8.6 and ACR 8.7 (beta).
    Either you have damaged, corrupt image files, or a faulty Photoshop and/or ACR installation.
    If there are no privacy issues, you can post one of your files to the FTP service of your choice (such as Dropbox or yousendit.com), post the link to it, and someone here can take a look at it for you.

  • Bridge CS6 and Camera Raw

    I am unable to open jpegs into camera raw through Bridge CS6. Camera Raw preferences are unavailable. I am using OS 10.9.2.

    Did you recently update to camera raw 8.4?
    If so, you need to replace the existing camera raw 8.4 plugin with the one from this link:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/bridge/kb/acr-84-bridge-cs6-metadata.html

  • Aperture Exporting JPEG's from RAW: file size and quality questions?

    Hey Everyone,
    So, I'm using Aperture 2 and I've got some questions about exporting from RAW to JPEG. I shoot with a Nikon D70 so original RAW files are 5-6mb in size. After doing some basic post processing when I export the pics at "full size" with picture quality of 11 out of 12 then the resulting JPEG is about half the file size of the original RAW file. For example a 5.6mb RAW becomes a 2.6mb JPEG. The resolution in pixels per inch and and the overall image size remain unchanged. Have I lost picture quality due to the exporting JPEG being smaller in file size?
    My friend who works with me prefers to edit in Photoshop and when he follows the same workflow his saved JPEG from the identical RAW file in Photoshop is minimally smaller in file size, say 5.6mb to 5.3mb. He's telling me that my Aperture edited photos are losing quality and resolution.
    Is he right, are my pics of lesser quality due to being a smaller file size? I've always been told that the quality of a picture is not in the mbs, but the pixel density.
    I've bee told that Aperture has a better compression engine and that the resulting files are of the exact same quality because the PPI and image size are the same. Is that what explains the much smaller file sizes in Aperture?
    I tried changing the picture quality in the export menu to 12 out of 12, but the resulting JPEG then becomes larger than the original RAW at over 7mbs.
    Can someone please help me understand this better? I don't want to lose picture quality if that is indeed what is happening.
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    mscriv wrote:
    So, I'm using Aperture 2 and I've got some questions about exporting from RAW to JPEG. I shoot with a Nikon D70 so original RAW files are 5-6mb in size. After doing some basic post processing when I export the pics at "full size" with picture quality of 11 out of 12 then the resulting JPEG is about half the file size of the original RAW file. For example a 5.6mb RAW becomes a 2.6mb JPEG. The resolution in pixels per inch and and the overall image size remain unchanged. Have I lost picture quality due to the exporting JPEG being smaller in file size?
    JPEG is a "lossy" file compression algorithm. Whether Aperture or PS, *every time a JPEG is saved some loss occurs*, albeit minimal at the 11 or 12 level of save, huge losses at low save levels. Some images (sky, straight diagonal lines, etc.) are more vulnerable to showing visible jpeg artifacts.
    My friend who works with me prefers to edit in Photoshop and when he follows the same workflow his saved JPEG from the identical RAW file in Photoshop is minimally smaller in file size, say 5.6mb to 5.3mb. He's telling me that my Aperture edited photos are losing quality and resolution.
    *Both of you are losing image data when you save to jpeg.* IMO the differences between the apps is probably just how the apps work rather than actually losing significantly more data. The real image data loss is in using JPEG at all!
    Is he right, are my pics of lesser quality due to being a smaller file size?
    I doubt it.
    I've always been told that the quality of a picture is not in the mbs, but the pixel density.
    The issue here is not how many pixels (because you are not varying that) but how much data each pixel contains. In this case once you avoid lossy JPEG the quality mostly has to do with different RAW conversion algorithms. Apple and Adobe both guess what Nikon is up to with the proprietary RAW NEF files and the results are different from ACR to Apple to Nikon. For my D2x pix I like Nikon's conversions the best (but Nikon software is hard to use), Aperture second and Adobe ACR (what Photoshop/Bridge uses) third. I 98% use Aperture.
    I tried changing the picture quality in the export menu to 12 out of 12, but the resulting JPEG then becomes larger than the original RAW at over 7mbs. Can someone please help me understand this better? I don't want to lose picture quality if that is indeed what is happening.
    JPEG is a useful format but lossy. Only use it as a _last step_ when you must save files size for some reason and are willing to accept the by-definition loss of image data to obtain smaller files (such as for web work or other on-screen viewing). Otherwise (especially for printing) save as TIFF or PSD which are non-lossy file types, but larger.
    As to the Aperture vs. ACR argument, RAW-convert the same original both ways, save as TIFF and see if your eyes/brain significantly prefer one over the other. Nikon, Canon etc. keep proprietary original image capture data algorithms secret and each individual camera's RAW conversion is different.
    HTH
    -Allen

  • CS6 gone from Creative Cloud, i need it

    I am about to roll out half my users to the creative cloud and wanted to have them all on CS6 because the other half are on the 'disk' version of CS6 already. (want them all on same version).
    I have just gone to create a 'Creative Cloud Package' and the applications i need are now are all CC (i need illustrator, photoshop and indesign), is there anywhere on 'the cloud' where i can download CS6 versions because going to the individual products pages doesnt even seem to give me an option of CS6 anymore.
    Creating a 'Creative Cloud Package' would be the ideal route too as I'd also prefer to not download all 3 of the applications 11 times.

    They can still have CS6 application as a part of their download.
    on download page www.creative.adobe.com they need to select CS6 application from drop down.
    For information on how to install the CS6 version of the software please see Download previous versions of Adobe Creative applications -http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/download-previous-versions-cr eative-applications.html

  • Photoshop CS6 missing from launchpad

    OK, this has been making me crazy for quite a while now.....
    System Info:
    MacBook Air
    13-inch, Mid 2012
    Processor  2 GHz Intel Core i7
    Memory  8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
    Graphics  Intel HD Graphics 4000
    Serial Number  irrelevant
    Software  OS X 10.9.4 (13E28) (I am not into beta-testing operating systems, so I am waiting for the official release of Yosemite before upgrading from Mavericks)
    I upgraded my complete Creative Suite installation a while back from CS5 to the CS6 1-year subscription. During all that time, I was able to find both versions of Photoshop (CS5 and CS6) in my launchpad. But once I followed Adobe's directions and updated to Creative Cloud, I can no longer find Photoshop CS6 there. I can locate it in the Applications folder in the Finder and run it from there, but it is not anywhere in Launchpad. All of my Adobe graphics and design apps are grouped together there, and CC simply replaced CS6 in that group, and it appears to have deleted all CS6 icons from Launchpad...... something which seriously ticks me off because it makes me feel like Adobe has hijacked my control over MY computer.
    There is absolutely NO NEED for Adobe to do this, and there are still times I would prefer to use one version over the other. I paid for the CS6 upgrade..... where did it go...... and how to I get it back to my Launchpad so that I can use it more easily? BETTER YET.... since a quick Google search will turn up any number of similar complaints, why doesn't Adobe just right their wrong in the next update? But absent that, can anybody give me a simple set of directions to follow to make my CS6 applications reappear in Launchpad?
    Sorry for sounding so grumpy about it, but this was just wrong of them to do this.

    Same thing is happening with me, I have certain CC programs installed for school, but I want to have the CS6 versions installed as well.  Spent the better part of this afternoon refreshing/restarting the Launchpad in the hopes of all my Adobe apps being visible.  I hope this issue is fixed soon.

  • How do I remove CS6 product from CC 'umbrella'?

    I'll try restating my problem for what is at least the fifth time. I am licensed user of Creative Suite CS6. I also subscribe to Creative Cloud. I need to run both versions of Photoshop, CC because of its enhanced features and CS6 because it doesn't break any plugins. (Believe me CC does!) Since subscribing to CC, my CS6 updates are badly (mis)managed by CC. I can't update PS CS6, although I never had a problem before. Now update fails. One common Adobe suggestion is to uninstall and reinstall to restore the useless (to me) language files. However, the Adobe experts are waffling a bit, so the problem may lie elsewhere. Someone replied to my last mention of this issue by suggesting that I run the CS6 clean-up tool after uninstalling. Ridiculous! This clean-up utility might well be as flawed as the updater?
    CS6 Creative Suite isn't granular. My installation DVD offers no single file operations that would include the shotgun approach of uninstalling (and probably breaking) any single app. Nobody at Adobe has published any useful information on how much reconfiguration might be required.
    The forums provide convincing testament to the hard fact that CC activation and updating are works in progress that have wasted countless user hours, including many of mine. If Adobe can't provide working updates, the very least they could do would be offering fully updated installers for the products CC won't update. Even when Adobe support was good (pre-CS4), this degree of user accomodation was rare, so I'm not holding my breath.
    The ultimate slap in the face was when I discovered that my retail copy of CS6 now demands routine reactivation as part of the CC license. Adobe, your activation servers are slow, sometimes behaving like they were overloaded or under attack. Yeah, I accepted the CC package because [you] offer no alternatives, and the updates justified the commitment. Nowhere was it made clear that [you] would be essentially crippling a perpetually licensed CS6 product by requiring reactivation on top of updates that don't work.
    I'm asking someone at Adobe to restore my Creative Suite CS6 to its original, fully unencumbereded condition. The groundswell of unhappy CC users is growing. If this request goes unanswered, or if I get another idiotic suggestion to atone for the defects of the CC updater by doing a lot of possibly pointless grunt work myself, I may have to consider measures to consolidate unhappy users and use group momentum to expedite resolution as [we] deem fit.

    Hi, if this is right this is an extremely annoying bug. The idea of installing CS6 again from scratch "just in case perhaps it might work is no fix for me" There are a number of updates that would need to be applied before I got anywhere near the installation I have at the moment that works just perfectly "CS Version at least".
    I've got too much work to do to spend time doing stuff like re-installing all my CS Apps just in case, better things to do.
    I'll have to hope adobe fix this bug or lets call it a missing feature of the installer "button that says stop trying to update me" for each app, or a setting in it's preference".
    Annoying as it is I'd just put up with this Red warning symbol in the updater in the menu and them populating the drop down menu in bright red for ever more or at least until I get another computer, that's easier and I'll go back to my old faulty setup on my iMac if I have to, after all if I do that I'd have to un-install CC on that computer anyway.
    Maybe it's time to get that MacPro and clean install, then at least I'd have a worth while reason.
    Then possibly at last Adobe Illustrator would run faster.

  • How do I process multiple files and turn them from raw to jpeg

    How do I process multiple files and turn them from raw to jpeg. Ive tried and it seems to go through the files but doesnt seem to process them or store them in the selected folder

    Yes that was the first thing I did. Then I used the process multiple files and selected a new folder to put them in and selected use open files and selected to turn them into jpeg. The images flash on the screen like they are being processed, but the folder never appears in library. Is it possible because there are a couple 16 bit files open that this corrupts the task. Do I need to create the folder first. Will elements not create the folder on its own.
    Thanks Vince

  • Is there a PS setting where it can read my Canon Mark 3 5D's monochrome setting so that the files will also appear in monochrome instead of colour? Or do I have to change from RAW each time to Monochrome within PS (even if I have set up for Monochrome in

    Is there a PS setting where it can read my Canon Mark 3 5D's monochrome setting so that the files will also appear in the same monochrome structure (instead of appearing in colour as it is now when i open in PS, not even monochrome)? Or do I have to change from RAW each time to Monochrome within PS (even if I have set up for Monochrome in my 5D)?
    1. Basically I am taking photos with a monochrome setting with my 5D and the screen shows monochrome.
    2. when i import this onto my computer and open with PS, it opens in colour.
    3. when I change this to Monochrome in PS. (It cannot read my monochrome setting with my preference of the greyscale mix when I viewed it on my 5D)
    4. my question is: is there a way so that PS can read the monochrome setting from my 5D and display the same monochrome setting as my 5D instead of a different one from PS.
    Lily

    you need camera raw 6.7 or better.
    i don't know what version of ps you have so i can't say if it can be updated to use that, but update anyway.
    pre cc updates:  http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/
    cc updates:  http://prodesigntools.com/adobe-cc-updates-direct-links-windows.html
    cc 2104 updates:  http://prodesigntools.com/adobe-cc-2014-updates-links-windows.html
    if you can't update your cr sufficiently, use the dng converter. DNG Converters:
    Win
    Mac

  • How to Create a OLAP Cube in DEV using SSAS from Raw file system backup from Production?

    How to Create a OLAP Cube in DEV using SSAS from Raw file system backup from Production? I dont have a .abf file available. Two paritions in production are missing data. We were able to get back file system backup which contains the files for these two paritions.
    How do I create a cube in Dev using this file system backup.
    we are on SQL Server 2008R2.
    Thanks,

    How to Create a OLAP Cube in DEV using SSAS from Raw file system backup from Production? I dont have a .abf file available. Two paritions in production are missing data. We were able to get back file system backup which contains the files for these two paritions.
    How do I create a cube in Dev using this file system backup.
    we are on SQL Server 2008R2.
    Thanks,

  • "Error while relocating" after deleting RAW from RAW+JPEG pairs (Important FYI)

    This is not a question, but something I recently discovered that I think will be important for the Aperture community.
    Not too long ago, I asked a question about how to remove the RAW files from RAW+JPEG pairs. The concensus was that it couldn't be done through Aperture, but that one could delete them through the Finder. The answer I got (and that has popped up in other threads on similar topics) was "it's probably not wise, but as far as I know, it won't have an adverse effect." I don't think any response along these lines has been able to point to a specific problem that can arise from such a "hack." Well, I found one today...
    It appears that if a user uses Finder to "break" RAW+JPEG pairs by deleting the RAW file and leaving the JPEG (and I assume this goes for deleting the reverse), Aperture will NOT be able to "Relocate Originals..." Instead, "Aperture will return the error: Error while relocating (File not Found): "(null)". I ran into this error the other day while trying to change my file structure by relocating all files. I regularly ran into this error, and it was only after some extensive that I was able to narrow it down 100% of the time to the RAW+JPEG pairs I had "broken." I haven't encounterd any other adverse behavior from "breaking" these file pairings, but this one, at least, could be serious.
    So, for future reference, I think the response by the Aperture community when someone asks "How do I delete the RAW file from RAW+JPEG" pairs, should be "Use Finder if you must, but please note Aperture will not be able to 'Relocate Originals..
    PS This should NOT be understood as a criticism of those who have responded to this question in the past. There's obviously no way to know about these little quirks until one of us stumbles across them. I hope this information will be helpful going forward, both as a caution when deleting one of the pair, and as a possible answer for the "Error while relocating" message.
    PPS I don't think I ran across an explanation for this when I originally searched for the error message bolded above.
    If someone has already provided this information, my apologies.

    Frank Caggiano wrote:
    Interesting the last post before this one you posted was back in May 2011 Removing RAW, keeping JPG?
    Thanks for that thread. That helps jog ye olde memory. As such, I would edit my original thread to read "The concensus I gathered from researching multiple responses to questions similar to mine was that it couldn't be done through Aperture*, but that it was possible from Finder though highly inadvisable." I won't bother recreating my research at the time (not even sure I could, since it was more than two years ago), but suffice it to say that the thread you've linked was not my sole encounter with this problem. I do appreciate that you've reminded me that this was not something I had done solely through numerous posts on Apple Discussions. I imagine I likely spent time reading multiple posts here and elsewhere, uncovering the concensus (which i think is still a fair term) that it could not be done through Aperture*, could be through Finder, but was inadvisable.
    *This is still accurate, afaik. You cannot delete the pair from a RAW+JPEG pair in Aperture. Exporting, then deleting in Finder, then reimporting is still not something "done in [entirely] Aperture."
    Frank Caggiano wrote:
    No one actually told you to delete anyting in in the Finder you came up with this yourself as your own solution
    This comes from the critical mistake on my part of not making clear that I was paraphrasing multiple responses rather than saying "Bob told on a Monday that i should..." That is one huge mea culpa and I'd edit it if I could. To be clear, my comment that "it's probably not wise, but as far as I know, it won't have an adverse effect" is a paraphrase of multiple answers to the broad question dealing with how Aperture handles files that have been deleted in Finder. At the time, it was known that you could delete a file in Finder, that Aperture could be made to accept that, that it might cause issues further down the road, but that those issues were unkown. I paraphrased that but failed to make it clear that's what I was doing. Again, my apologies.
    Frank Caggiano wrote:
    So I'm not really sure what it is you are coming back here now to say? There was no 'consensus' to do this, it was your own 'solution'
    In this respect, I think you've misunderstood me. At the time I made this post, I still was not seeing a direct connection between deleting files in Finder and adverse consequences in Aperture (or perhaps I should say my searches did not turn up such a connection). As such, I made this post to provide the community with clear evidence of why one should not delete one-of-a-pair files in Finder. Again, I may have simply missed the thread that detailed that to do so would result in a null error when relocating Masters. That said, in July 2013 I had been pulling my hair out trying to figure out why I was getting the null error and I did not see a thread that asked "have you deleted files in Finder" as a way to troubleshoot.
    Hopefully, I've cleared up any confusion now. To bring this all back around to my original point for the thread, I intended it to (1) offer a more direct way to troubleshoot the null error on relocating Masters, and (2) to offer a cautionary tale for those who choose to delete one of the RAW+JPEG pair in Finder. There are better (though more time- and space-consuming) ways to get it done, and my original post should help demonstrate why.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I copy and paste from internet I could do this on internet explorer

    I need to be able to copy from the internet and paste in my reports. I can't do that on Foxfire! Help

  • Drop ship warehouse shows in stock quantities for some items

    We have a customer using SBO 2007 A SP 01 PL 08. The inventory posting report shows the drop ship warehouse with onhand balances. We have tried to create reversing entries to remove these quantities and the system ignores the transaction as it should

  • Migrating Hyperion Reports to OBIEE.

    Hi, I'm OBIEE analyst and I don't know so much about "Hyperion World". So, we need to migrate some Hyperion Reports (Web Analysis, Financial Reporting and Interative Reporting - modules) to OBIEE. I've been studing about the subject and I discovered

  • RE:  case  283334456

    The support "help" system seems to be circular without resolution.  How do I ask a question related to an existing case?  I was sent an e-mail requesting fedback, but the system will not accept my reponse.  I was asked to fill out a pdf form, which I

  • Xerox Phaser 6350DP - Connected and Ready but will NOT PRINT!! Help.

    'm using OS 10.4.11 to connect to a printer on a Windows server using LDP. I can add the printer, the PPD works, and when I print, the job shows up in the queue, then moves to the "Completed" section. But it never prints. I can even go to "Supply Lev