Customer & Vendor not transported via Plant tCodes WB01/2 or WB07/8
Hello,
We have change control enabled in our Dev, instance/clients SAP 4.7 IS-Retail , Basis 6.2
Looking for help in understanding the necessary steps to transport the Plant Vendor and Customer records.
The transport includes Plant records, but in the destination client the Customer and Vendor records that
are automatically created via WB01/02 are not being included in the transports?
Would appreciate any advice on how we transport the Vendor and Customer records that automatically
get created via WB01/2 in the source client to the destination client.
If we try to use XD01, XK01 the system enforces the Customer/Vendor records can only be maintained
via the WB## transaction codes for IS-Retail.
Have tried using WB07/08 and included in a transport, but still the Customer & Vendor master records
are not being included in the transport.
Any ideas?
Regards, Ron.
WB02 can not be used if the Customer and Vendor are not created implicitly via WB01, this
is why the transport methodology is failing, See below. We were able to use WB01 on an existing
Plant that had been transported, to maintain/create the Customer and Vendor relationship,
but this produced inconsistent CO relationships that caused ME59 to fail.
Note, you can not use XD01/XK01 for Customer/Vendor maintenance as it would pertain
to Plant Customer Vendor relationships, this must be done via WB## t-codes.
What we have found is that exporting and importing plants includes the Customer & Vendor
coupled to the Plant. However the export and import WBTE,WBTI capability is not working
properly as is similar to the transport capability.
So, we have reverted to manually creating the Plant in each Instance Dev "IMG Gold Client",
Test, Pro to complete this requirement. This has proven to work, but transports and or
export/import have proven to not work as expected. Probably specific issue with SAP
IS-Retail.
Similar Messages
-
Message: Vendor not assigned to Plant
Hi All,
I am creating a standard PO for raw material. While creating I am getting a message : Vendor not assigned to Plant.
This message should not come as my PO is not a inter-company PO.
Can someone help me.
Thanks,
Vengal Rao.Hi
Sandra is right (and Paulo). This message is once hardcoded in all system (function module AIP01_PLANT_DETERMINE):
call function 'AIP01_T001W_EXT_READ'
exporting
i_lifnr = i_lifnr
importing
es_t001w_ext = es_t001w_ext
exceptions
plant_not_found = 1
others = 2.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
message e002 with i_lifnr raising vendor_not_found.
endif.
Regards
Eduardo
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Oct 27, 2011 4:54 PM
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Oct 27, 2011 4:55 PM -
Need to pick customs vendor automatically.
Hi All,
I am maitaining the condition for customs through MEK2 and the same value is apperaring in the PO. But i need to make the system to pick the cusotms vendor automatically, for this what settings i need to do or where should i need to maintain it.
Please note I have 2 customs vendor based on the plant i may take the respective vendor. please guide.
Rgds
SriniHI,
Option one.-Create Infor record first
Enter the cond type in MEK2 choose ur key combination(For eg Material info record) enter the values and select the line and click on lens icon and enter the vendor at the bottom.Then create PO ur custom vendor will come automatically in PO.To view this select the condition type & click on lens icon u can see the vendor entered in MEK2.
Option 2
Create Info record and in that enter the condition type select ur condition type and go to the lens icon in the bottom u can enter the customs vendor and save.When u create the PO the vendor will come automatically ib the PO .To see this vendor select the cond type & click the lens icon u can see the vendor entered in IR.
Note-All the import condition should be created as planned delivery cost in condition type.In the condition type give the condition category as B.
Note-Only u make one vendor default in PO u have change if u want to enter the alternate vendor
MURUGAN
Edited by: Murugan mgl on Jul 20, 2009 9:18 AM
Edited by: Murugan mgl on Jul 20, 2009 9:41 AM -
HI Experts,
i am stuck in one issue like below scenario
i have created total 10 plants from Reference plant (EC02) TR(Transport number) also created .. but some configuration part was missing so Created one separate TR for all 10 plants(transportation zone assignment ) . later 5 plants TR has been Marker for do not transport & 5 plants TR has been moved to quality server along with that separate TR. . So in quality server all 10 plants are visible(t001w) but 5 plants are well configured & reaming 5 plants has missing entries. it is happened due to that separate TR for all 10 plants.
now please suggest how to delete these remaining 5 entries from Quality. what are the effects we have to take care now?
Regards
Raj
Sbuject was edited by: Jürgen LHi,
If there is no transaction data and other dependent configuration in dev and quality for these plants, you may delete the plant from dev and move the TR to Quality. The same changes will be affected there. If you have documents in the plants to be deleted, I would suggest to archive these docs and then delete the plant.
Regards,
AKPT -
Supplying Plant field is not appearing in vendor creation of receving plant
Dear Friends,
Iam configuring Cross Company Scenario to my client for the version SAP 4.6C as they implemented a new company code and want to transport the material from one company code to another company code.
I made all the required customizations in the system
while creation a vendor code in the reciving plant in Pur.Org.Data screen->Extras--> Add.Pur.data i am unbale to view plant field where we maintail supplying plant
In OMSG at purchasing data at add purchasing data PLANT, vsr relevacne & plant relevance made optiional
but while creation of vedor code the other two VSR relevance and Plant relevance indicators are populating but the PLANT field is not appearing.
without this assignment while creating a STO, shipping data tab is not appearing
Please Provide me input in solving this error.
Thanks inadvance
Regards
SriniDear Srini Behara
The field selection is controled at Vendor accounting group.
For Vendor account group (std 0001) , the field Plant in additional Pur data is supressed whereas for accounting group 0007 this field is activated.
Please rfer the following path to activate the field
SPRO--> Financial accounting --> Account receible and Payable --> vendor accounts --> Master data --> Prepataions for creating vendor master data --> Define account groups with screen layout
Select the Vendor account group and go to Purchase org data and change the Plant filed option.
Or create teh Vendor under accounting group Plant (0007 std)
warm regards
Ramakrishna -
How to load R/3 Plant, Customer, Vendor, all linked in T001W
Hi,
In R/3 we have a Plant PL01. In the initial load of object DNL_PLANT this creates CRM BP #101 with role BBP003.
In R/3 we have a Customer CPL01 (linked to Plant PL01 in R/3 customizing table T001W). In the initial load of object BUPA_MAIN this creates CRM BP #102 CRM000.
In R/3 we have a Vendor VPL01 (linked to Plant PL01 in R/3 customizing table T001W). In the initial load of object VENDOR_MAIN this creates CRM BP #103 with role BBP000.
Question 1: How can we create the R/3 Plant PL01 in CRM as BP #PL01 (i.e. using an external number range)?
Question 2: How can we create the Plant, Customer & Vendor as a single CRM BP #?
Points will be rewarded.
Thanks,
JJim,
The problem you face is that CRM is going to download those as three separate partners.
Note 865321 gives a solution on how to load plants into CRM in an external range that you would specify. This is however for DNL_PLANT.
Your next issue is unless your plant as customer and your plant as a vendor are in separate account groups for each, you won't be able to map these into a single business partner in CRM, unless you do some manipulation.
I guess what you could do on an initial load for those objects is the following:
1. If the customer or vendor is a plant:
- Remanipulate the BDOC so that it becomes the single "plant business partner", on the ERP side.
2. For delta's you will need to also do this remanipulation.
3. If you plan on sending delta changes from CRM back to R/3 then on the CRM side you will need to decide how to distribute the changes from the single business partner back to the customer and vendor partners.
This is definitely possible, but it is going to take some effort and you will need a very seasoned middleware developer to make it happen. I am guessing a couple of weeks for a experienced middleware guru to complete this.
Good luck,
Stephen -
STO for a customer/vendor of another plant
Is it possible to transfer a stock from a plant warehouse to a customer or vendor of another plant? What is the procedure?
Thanks. Yes, all our SC vendors are assigned to Plant. Based on Sub con PO created, the vendor stock gets created.
My concern: I want to transfer a stock (as such removal) from one plant say P1 to a customer/vendor of another plant P2. This SC vendor will supply FG to P2 as the Subcon PO is created so. Logically, via ME2O, P2 should provide the component to that vendor. But In real time, physically components are being supplied from P1.
How can I send a stock from one plant to a customer of another plant? This can be done 541 Transfer posting.. From: IG10 Dest: IG14 and with the SC vendor.
But before I do this 541 Transfer posting I need a base order ( I thought STO is the way) from which I should do OBD and then I should go for that 541 transfer posting..
from P1 to SC vendor via P2..
Am I clear? Is it possible?
Edited by: Allenborn on Jun 11, 2011 1:43 AM -
CRM 5.0 Vendor Location determination in Order, Item not exist in Plant
CRM 5.0 I have read and implemented oss note 493497. We use ECC ATP not APO.
If I create an order in CRM I find a vendor and the partner is added at the header and item.
If plant A is found and the materials exist in plant A then all works well and replicates to ECC.
But in cases where some line items do not exist in plant A, they exist only in plant B the order fails to replicate accross. I have to manually change the item vendor to plant B then it passes to ECC.
I have read this SAP help but I am a bit confused why my test fails.
SAP Help > Location Determination in the Sales Order
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/5d/40053b1b3ecc35e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Since we are using ECC ATP what do I need to correct?
OSS Note 513884 - CRM 3.0: Automatic Vendor determination in sales order looks like a good note but says it applies only for CRM 3.0. Is it valid for 5.0?
What access sequence do you use for Vendor in partner determination?
Will give points, thanks.Hello Sharad,
I gave you 6 pts, we have plants in the east, west, and central part of the country.
The East & West carry most products but only specialty or low volume products are stocked in the central. If I change the access sequence to the material (central) then customers on the east & west will get stocked from the wrong location as all lines will pull the central location.
Is almost like the ECC scenario where you want to ship from closest location to customer but if product does not exist at that location then look at material master setting. Yes, this scenario could cause an order to get shipped from 2 plants based on which products are ordered. -
Transport tequest not getting deactivated for tcode ksu1 & ksv1 in sandbox
Hi,
my requirement is to deactivate transport request for tcode ksu1 & ksv1 in sandbox. i applied SAP NOTE 326080 in sandbox. but still getting transport request for the tcode ksu1 & ksv1.
please tell me how to resolve this issue.
Thanks.
RohitasyaSeems like the note you implemented activated the checkbox "Current Setting" in Transaction Code SOBJ for object such as CPC1 I would suggest you to go verify that (if the check box is active) if you look in the field 'Transport' above it, it says "Automatic Transport" and that check box means
Flag: Object belongs to current settings
Indicates that the current settings in the production system could entail changes
for the object involved.
Use
SAP determines the number of client-specific Customizing objects that belong
to the current settings.
Dependencies
The flag is only relevant in a production client ("productive" role in the client table).
Even if changes to client-specific objects are not allowed, the current setting can
be changed in a production client without being recorded automatically.
Since the very purpose of the note you implemented is to test KSU1 to able to run (for a non-modifiable system which is production type system) you have to make your sand box behave like production. So, my suggestion would be go to SCC4 and change the Client role to "Production" don't do any other changes, then ask your Costing consultant to test KSU1 and KSV1 transactions and as soon as he tests if it's working fine, revert the Client role to whatever it was.
You may look at the following post also
Distribution and Assessment Cycle
Edited by: Jeevan Sagar on Sep 13, 2011 6:44 AM -
FI Archiving - System error: Customer/vendor line item not on OI basis
While archiving FI Documetns using object FI_Documnt, I am getting message System error: Customer/vendor line item not on OI basis for few non archivable documents. Is it like these also open items and can not be able to archive them. Or what is the root cause of these error message.
Regards,
ShaileshHi Adisha,
This error pertains to the accounting fundamentals and SAP does not have anything to do with this....you ask yourself that if you were not using SAP and simlar problem came your way what would you have done...this has no solution...
Either you wait for the next invoice with big amount but which seems bit impractical..
In this we really need to consult the Accounting Standards to see what it could allow.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi -
Customer/vendor could not be determined for intermediate document
does any one know how to solve this problem, i got this error for an inbound idoc 820 (remmitance advice).
Hi rob,
Message no. FD017
This is the following message:
Customer/vendor could not be determined for intermediate document 0000000000047039
Message no. FD017
Diagnosis
Several procedures are defined for determining the partner (customer or vendor):
1. The customer/vendor can send his/her account number (the account
number in our system) in the address segment.
2. The customer/vendor can send his/her account number (our number at
the customer or vendor) in the address segment.
3. Only the name in the address segment clearly identifies the
customer/vendor. In this case you can create an allocation within
intermediate document customizing (IDoc base -> Control -> Forward
inbound).
4. The customer/vendor is determined using his/her bank details (only
for the "INVOIC01" intermediate document type).
5. The customer/vendor is taken from the control record of the
intermediate document.
For 1.-3.: One of the address segments with the partner functions
"II", "RS", "SU", 'SE' ("INV_ID01"), or "RS" or
"LF" ("INVOIC01") is used for determining the
customer/vendor.
Procedure
Create the customer or vendor within Financial Accounting or maintain his/her bank details.
Create customer - Proceed
Customer bank details - Proceed
Create vendor - Proceed
Vendor bank details - Proceed
If the customer/vendor can only be determined using his/her name, create a record within intermediate document customizing with
logical address = name, application = "FI" or "MM" and physical target in the SAP system = customer number/vendor number.
Proceed -
Customer/vendor could not be determined for IDOC
Hi all,
Am trying to post incoming payments through EDI ..
IDOC Information
IDOC type: PEXR2002
Message type: REMADV
Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_REMADV
Process code: REMA
Am getting these 2 errors :
Customer/vendor could not be determined for intermediate document
Company code could not be determined for intermediate document
Has anyone encountered this problem, if yes can anyone suggest the solutions, any help regarding this is highly appreciated.
Thanks.Hi,
Currently I am facing with the same type error when trying to post incoming payments through EDI.
IDOC Information
IDOC type: PEXR2002
Message type: REMADV
Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_REMADV
Process code: REMA
I am getting the below error:
1. Company code could not be determined for intermediate document
I have maintained record records for partner type and partner number in OBCA.
Please advice what are the other configuration changes do I need to maintain.
Your assistance would be highly appreciated.
Thanks.
Edited by: Victor Collins on Feb 27, 2009 9:31 PM -
Customer , vendor 0000049256 not known (EDI process)
We are trying to send an IDoc type INVOIC from one SAP R/3 system to
another using the SAP XI/PI.
Right now we are experience an error Customer , vendor 0000049256 not
known, after have check all ALE/EDI configuration between the source
system (SAP R/3 4.6B), the middleware (SAP XI/PI 7.0) and the receiver
system (SAP R/3 4.6B with IS-OIL) we still dont find the solution.
We applied the note 117814, with the following code (file attach).
Source (SD module sends an IDoc type INVOIC) SAP R/3 4.6B
BASIS 53
ABAP 53
APPL 53
Middleware (SAP XI/PI 7.0)
BASIS 12
ABAP 12
Target (MM module receives an IDoc type INVOIC) SAP R/3 4.6B
BASIS 38
ABAP 38
APPL 37
IS-OIL 37
Can someone help us?
Thanks in advance
Un Saludo/Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüssen,
João Paulo Reis
Accenture SI SAP - Technology
Edificio Accenture
C/Ramírez de Arellano, 35
Madrid - Spain 28043
T: +34 915966000
F: +34 91 596 6695
Mobile : + 34 606432447Hello Joao,
Check your logical system which represent the R/3 did you Configured the Customer Distribution Model correctly?Do an initial check for ports,partner profile and inbound/outbound parameters.
Regards,
jafer -
Error " M7 185 " consignment stock does not exists with Customer/vendor
Dear SDN Team,
The system is throwing the error "Special stock at customer/vendor 3000000001 does not exist (Notification E M7 185) .
The consignment Process has been sucessfully maintained correctly with the customer/vendor in ECC system ,but the CRM system is but not able to recognize that the stock is available and throwing the error "Special stock at customer/vendor 3000000001 does not exist (Notification E M7 185).
kindly suggest.
Regards
M.R.ReddyHi Mirja,
have you gaines any solution for this issue. I am currently facing the same problem and have no idea how to solve it
Thanks
Matthias -
I need to be change plant customer and Vendor address as per plant setup.
Hi
I need to be change plant customer and Vendor address as per plant setup.
Pls tell me the t-codes and process configuration to setup these changes.
I have already change Plan & shipping point address in configuration.
Regard
vickyHi Vicky ,
Use OX10 for Changing Plant Address.
For Customer - XD02
For Vendor Add : XK02.
Regards
Ramesh Ch
Maybe you are looking for
-
My iPod is disabled and I do not have internet access it says I have to connect to i tunes but how ? I do not have internet. Is there another way I can reset my iPod ? BTW I'm only 13
-
My 30 pin cable is stuck in my usb extender i got with my mac
I got a usb extension cable with my mac, that is supposed to be used with your keyboard. But i plugged my iphone cable in it, and now it is stuck. My previous mac also got this cable with it, and the hole in the new usb extender seems narrower than t
-
Change default language of login in database
Hi, Working on SQL Azure. I'm running queries that are date dependent and so I need to set the default language of the user to be British (to get dd/mm/yyyy format). How can I do this in Azure. Create Login and Alter Login are restricted and when I q
-
Issue bringing up ADF form in IE8
When I try to bring up an ADF form using IE8, I'm getting thousands of messages like the one shown below in the access.log file and the form never appears. When I use Firefox, the form comes up correctly and none of these messages appear. 10.83.30.11
-
New Update 10.3.1 has messed up My Blackberry Z10
hi, im trying to find a way to fix my Z10, i just updated to the new OS yesterday and I am so frustrated I'm about to just give up on smartphones, i really dont need it anymore and Blackberry is so far behind it is unreal! so since the update when i