Customer/Vendor Reconcilliation

Please suggest how to do Customer/ Vendor Reconciliation ?
Moderator: Please, avoid asking basic questions

But can F.13 clear open customer created as above in one company code with open vendor in the other company code.
currently the open items stands as
IC1010 (inter company customer) DR 100$ 1000 (Company)
IV1000 (Inter company vendor) CR 100$ 1010 (Company).
How will these be cleared. From where can we get the clearing GL to automatically clear this.

Similar Messages

Query on Grouping Tax Base Balances for Italian Report Customer/Vendor List

Hello Experts,
We are implementing the new italian report for customer/vendor List as per Note : 1090857 - Customer/Vendor List for Italy:New Legal Requirement (2007)
This requires a customizing in Table/View V_T007K(Group Tax Base Balances) where we need to group the tax codes.
Based on what logic is this table required to be maintained and what considerations need to be taken care of when mainting the tax codes for each column.
Anyone who has maintained this table or who is ware of the procedure and logic of maintainance , could kindly advise on the same.
Points would be awarded for any helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajeshwari

Hello,
Thanks for your answer,
On what basis should the grouping be done.
Is it only based on the tax codes types?
or is there any specific rule.
has anyone maintained this grouping for a Italian company code before?
Points would be awarded immediately for any help in this.
Thanks & Warm Regards,
Rajeshwari

Aging Report with Customer/Vendor Ref. No. should allow backdate

Aging Reports for Suppliers and Customers.
The current printing of the aging reports using Sales Document tab or the Purchase Document tab does not tie with the GL balances when the dates are backdated. It is important that the detail aging report to show the customer/ vendor ref. no.
There are times when urgent outgoing/ incoming payment are entered into the system for the current period when the vendor detail aging reports or the customer statement with the customer/ vendor ref. no is not ready to be printed for the previous period.
By allow backdating, it gives the users much needed flexibility in creating the transactions into SAP Business One without having to wait till all the previous month financial reporting is finalized. This is especially important during the financial year end.
Current Workaround: None.

Hello,
Thank you for your input. The limitation is solved in 2007 A / 2007 B version as a part of new Internal Reconciliation concept.
Regards,
Peter Dominik
Solution Manager
B1 Product Definition Team

Customized Vendor Aging Report

Dear Experts,
We had developed a customized Vendor Aging Crystal Report as on Date for one of our customer which is similar to SAP's Vendor Liabilities Aging, just a minor change we have been done in our report for calculating the due date of AP Invoice only for the document type as Item, from AP Invoice document date to GRPO's posting date.
So to build this report we had consider following transactions AP Invoice, AP Credit Memo, AP Down Payment Invoice, Outgoing Payment, Incoming Payment & Journal Entry and also we had concluded following scenario's:-
AP Invoice based on GRPO
Standalone AP Invoice's Item / Service.
AP Invoice adjusted against AP Credit Memo.
AP Invoice knocked off against Reconciliation.
AP Credit Memo based on AP Invoice
AP Credit Memo standalone Item /Service
AP Credit Memo adjusted against Outgoing Payment
AP Credit Memo knocked off against Reconciliation
AP Down Payment Invoice - Open.
Outgoing Payment - On Account
Outgoing Payment - Against Transaction.
Outgoing Payment - Direct Knocked off in Reconciliation.
Incoming Payment - On Account
Incoming Payment - Direct Knocked off in Reconciliation.
Journal Entry - Adjusted and Unadjusted
After considering all the possible scenario which do have impact with Vendor has been covered but still our report gets failed to tally with SAP Vendor Liabilities Aging Report on back dated date specially with reco happened transaction which get failed on comparison with Input parameter date against transaction date and reconciled date.
Please refer the attachment contains Store Procedure of this report. We would highly appreciate and thankful if some one could help us in optimizing our store procedure which could get tallied with SAP Vendor Liabilities Aging Report.
Many Thanks in Advance......
Regards
Krishna Kumar

Hi,
Not able to open attached file. Please check these threads:
Vendor Aging Report SAP B1
Customer Receivables Aging - Query
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Customer / Vendor Aging Report

Hi,
It´s important to consider the next filter or selection criteria for the reports:
-. Customer and Vendor Aging Reports
Filters:
-. by Sales Employee (Customer Aging)
-. by Buyer (Vendor Aging)
regards

Hello Humberto,
New selection criteria of Sales Employee/Buyer is part of enhancements of Aging Reports in SAP Business One 8.8 release.
When you generate the aging report in v8.8:
u2022 You can group the report by customer or sales employee in the customer receivables aging report, and by vendor or buyer in the vendor liabilities aging report.
u2022 You can specify more flexible time interval. For the time interval Days, 4 new fields are added for you to specify the duration.
u2022 You can hide the Future Remit column on the report by choosing Ignore Future Remit.
u2022 When the aging report has been generated, you can view multicustomer/multivendor detailed information in the aging report window. There is no need to double-click each customer/vendor row to view the details.
Peter Dominik
B1 Solution Management

FI Archiving - System error: Customer/vendor line item not on OI basis

While archiving FI Documetns using object FI_Documnt, I am getting message System error: Customer/vendor line item not on OI basis for few non archivable documents. Is it like these also open items and can not be able to archive them. Or what is the root cause of these error message.
Regards,
Shailesh

Hi Adisha,
This error pertains to the accounting fundamentals and SAP does not have anything to do with this....you ask yourself that if you were not using SAP and simlar problem came your way what would you have done...this has no solution...
Either you wait for the next invoice with big amount but which seems bit impractical..
In this we really need to consult the Accounting Standards to see what it could allow.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Customer & vendor invoices

Hi gurus & experts,Here i got an issue regarding customer & vendor invoices.
I tried to post an entry using t-code f-22(customer invoice)/f-43vendor invoice, able to post but unable to view the document no. and then system shows the following error message. Express Document' updates terminated' by author.
Here i found that when we post the document directly its shows error message and the document is going directly to business workplace (t-code SBWP). Just see in that inbox, And see in t-code(ST22) ,userid : jyothin, SYNTAX_ERROR there you find some run time error problem.
Regards,
I will Assign Max points.

Hi,
Check whether any workflow is attached.
Thanks,
Sridevi
<i>* Pls. assign points if useful</i>

Intercompany FI customer/vendor invoice clearing F-32

Hello,
In ECC 6.0, we created Customer (DR) and Vendor (KR) invoices using FI transaction. When we clear Customer/Vendor using F-32, the invoices get cleared, but the process produces intercompany document (AB) as a open item on both Customer and Vendor accounts. The companies have different currencies, but no exchange rate differences. OBYA has customer / vendor account numbers as clearing accounts. Can some one tell me why the intercompany clearing document is created as an open item and what need to be done to avoid this.
Thanks in advance.
Raj Vellore

Hi sagar,
two causes it will appear
1) if u r clear partial payment that time it will come open items.
2) if u r useing Document splitting in New G/L concept ECC 5.0 OR ECC 6.0, this will come because of Document Splitting.
in which version u r using.
regards
gvr

NEW GL: Customer/Vendor Line items cannot be displayed per business area

Hello ECC 6.0 Masters!
We have implemented Standard Document Splitting by Business area(BUSA). See below scenario..
ENTRY VIEW
PK     Account          Segment          Amount
01     Customer               100
50     Expense          BUSA1          60-
50     Expense          BUSA2          40-
GL VIEW
PK     Account               Segment          Amount
01     CustomerReconAcct     BUSA1          60
01     CustomerReconAcct     BUSA1          40
50     Expense               BUSA1          60-
50     Expense               BUSA2          40-
However after implementation we discovered that because the Customer/Vendor BUSA is blank in entry view, we now cannot derive reports that are normally based on the BUSA of Customer/Vendor line item, which we used to be able to do prior to implementing NEW GL.
Some of them are below:
1. Debtor Ageing Analysis (Standard)
2. Customer/Vendor line items per BUSA (Standard)
3. Several other Sublegder based custom reports we have that neeed to be categorized by BUSA
My question now is..Is there a way to derive these Business Area information under Vendor and Customer account to produce our reports? Especially for the Ageing which is key to the business process of my client.
I hope somebody there has experienced this before. thanks!
Andrew

Hi
You will not get ageing reports based on BA after new gl migration. You need to bring the info from the new gl tables. one of the easiest ways is to get the info from the table FAGL_SPLINFO by passign BSEG-BELNR. For defining ageing reports in new gl use t code FKI3 and FDI3 for Vendors and Customers respectively.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Error while uploading .xml file for Customer/Vendor List for Italy

Hi All,
We are facing problem while uploading the .xml file in DMEE transaction for the new Customer/Vendor List for Italy.
We have followed the entire process given in the OSS Note(1090857).
We have SAP 4.6c and followed the below steps:
1. Created ID-FI-IT Development class
2. Added domains
3. Added Data elements
4. Tried to upload the given .xml file and got any error saying ".xml file could not be interpreted".
Also there is a .SAR file mentioned to upload if we receive any errors while uploading .xml file.
Tried uploading the .SAR file also. STill we are recieving the same Error.
Can any one of you help us out.
Thanks in Advance.
Ramesh

Ok, we upload .SAR file in this way:
1. unpack .SAR file with SAPCAR.EXE program. Yuo obtain 2 files
R492445.P9C and K492445.P9C
2. put K492445.P9C in directory \SAPMNT\TRANS\COFILES and put R492445.P9C in directory \SAPMNT\TRANS\DATA of your system (DEV, TST or PRD)
3. Use Tx STMS. If You want create DMEE tree in DEV system, go to DEV import queue. Choose menu Extras | Other requests | Add. Insert P9CK492445 in Transp. request field.
4. Import the request. This creates the DMEE tree. You don't need ti upload XML file after. You can see the DMEE tree created with Tx DMEE and inserting
Tree type UMS1
Format tree IT_CUST_VEN_LIST
5. after continue follow the note
I hope this help you
Roberto

Custom vendor,freight vendor in case of import purchase order

Hi all,
I make the purchase order for imported goods and provide the insurance vendor,custom vendor & clearing charges vendor in PO itself. But when i was go for MIRO for planned delivery cose system show me message as:
Different invoicing party 1000055 planned for del. costs item in PO
4500000280
    Message no. M8287
Diagnosis
    You entered an invoice for delivery costs.
    In a delivery costs item for purchase order 4500000280, the invoicing
    party is 1000055. You are now posting the invoice to 1000040. This can
    be for one of two reasons:
    o   You entered 4500000280 in the field Purchase order, and 1000040 in
        the field Invoicing party.
    o   You entered a multiple allocation. The first item refers to a
        purchase order with invoicing party 1000040. Another item refers to
        purchase order 4500000280. The system copies the invoicing party
        from the first delivery costs item to all items, in this case
Note:
The category of this message can be changed in Customizing for Invoice
Verification. This means that you can receive a message as an error
message even though it is defined as a warning message in the standard
system.
The following documentation deals with the case applicable to the
standard system only.
cedure
Check your entries and make any necessary corrections.
If you want to allow delivery costs with different invoicing parties to
be selected, change the system message to W in Customizing. To do this,
you work through the step Define Attributes of System Messages in the
Implementation Guide for Invoice Verification.
The message is set as an error message in the standard system. In this
case, the delivery costs are not selected.
regards,
dinesh

Import Vendor return is like re export from business point of view.
You can follow export sales process in sap.
What i suggest is for example if it is raw material you can create a bom with parent material as X-01,child material as Y what
you are returning to vendor.
Note: Create parent material as HALB with sales view & accounting view with valuation of raw material.
Do production goods receipt,it willl bring stock to parent material.
Create customer for vendor.
Adopt export sales process,create a sales order,delivery,billing,invoice,excise invoice,ARE1.
Note : Discuss with FI consultant/core team take care of accounting effects in billing.
Clear balances for customer or vendor using F-53 or F-58.
Note : You need to tell excise/submit documents telling it is not actual export.
or
If you opt for purchasing route,then there is lot of customs formalities to be completed & also need to pay duties taken credit,depends on value of goods if it is high, you can opt for import vendor returns or ask vendor for debit memo which will be adjusted with future purchases against same vendor
I also asked same question in forum, refer link for solution [ Import material - Vendor returned(Indian scenario) |Import material - Vendor returned(Indian scenario);

Customer/vendor could not be determined for intermediate document

does any one know how to solve this problem, i got this error for an inbound idoc 820 (remmitance advice).

Hi rob,
Message no. FD017
This is the following message:
Customer/vendor could not be determined for intermediate document 0000000000047039
Message no. FD017
Diagnosis
Several procedures are defined for determining the partner (customer or vendor):
1. The customer/vendor can send his/her account number (the account
   number in our system) in the address segment.
2. The customer/vendor can send his/her account number (our number at
   the customer or vendor) in the address segment.
3. Only the name in the address segment clearly identifies the
   customer/vendor. In this case you can create an allocation within
   intermediate document customizing (IDoc base -> Control -> Forward
   inbound).
4. The customer/vendor is determined using his/her bank details (only
   for the "INVOIC01" intermediate document type).
5. The customer/vendor is taken from the control record of the
   intermediate document.
For 1.-3.: One of the address segments with the partner functions
           "II", "RS", "SU", 'SE' ("INV_ID01"), or "RS" or
           "LF" ("INVOIC01") is used for determining the
           customer/vendor.
Procedure
Create the customer or vendor within Financial Accounting or maintain his/her bank details.
Create customer         - Proceed
Customer bank details   - Proceed
Create vendor           - Proceed
Vendor bank details     - Proceed
If the customer/vendor can only be determined using his/her name, create a record within intermediate document customizing with
logical address = name, application = "FI" or "MM" and physical target in the SAP system = customer number/vendor number.
Proceed

Customer/vendor could not be determined for IDOC

Hi all,
Am trying to post incoming payments through EDI ..
IDOC Information
IDOC type: PEXR2002
Message type: REMADV
Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_REMADV
Process code: REMA
Am getting these 2 errors :
Customer/vendor could not be determined for intermediate document
Company code could not be determined for intermediate document
Has anyone encountered this problem, if yes can anyone suggest the solutions, any help regarding this is highly appreciated.
Thanks.

Hi,
Currently I am facing with the same type error when trying to post incoming payments through EDI.
IDOC Information
IDOC type: PEXR2002
Message type: REMADV
Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_REMADV
Process code: REMA
I am getting the below error:
1. Company code could not be determined for intermediate document
I have maintained record records for partner type and partner number in OBCA.
Please advice what are the other configuration changes do I need to maintain.
Your assistance would be highly appreciated.
Thanks.
Edited by: Victor Collins on Feb 27, 2009 9:31 PM

How to load R/3 Plant, Customer, Vendor, all linked in T001W

Hi,
In R/3 we have a Plant PL01. In the initial load of object DNL_PLANT this creates CRM BP #101 with role BBP003.
In R/3 we have a Customer CPL01 (linked to Plant PL01 in R/3 customizing table T001W). In the initial load of object BUPA_MAIN this creates CRM BP #102 CRM000.
In R/3 we have a Vendor VPL01 (linked to Plant PL01 in R/3 customizing table T001W). In the initial load of object VENDOR_MAIN this creates CRM BP #103 with role BBP000.
Question 1: How can we create the R/3 Plant PL01 in CRM as BP #PL01 (i.e. using an external number range)?
Question 2: How can we create the Plant, Customer & Vendor as a single CRM BP #?
Points will be rewarded.
Thanks,
J

Jim,
The problem you face is that CRM is going to download those as three separate partners.
Note 865321 gives a solution on how to load plants into CRM in an external range that you would specify. This is however for DNL_PLANT.
Your next issue is unless your plant as customer and your plant as a vendor are in separate account groups for each, you won't be able to map these into a single business partner in CRM, unless you do some manipulation.
I guess what you could do on an initial load for those objects is the following:
1. If the customer or vendor is a plant:
- Remanipulate the BDOC so that it becomes the single "plant business partner", on the ERP side.
2. For delta's you will need to also do this remanipulation.
3. If you plan on sending delta changes from CRM back to R/3 then on the CRM side you will need to decide how to distribute the changes from the single business partner back to the customer and vendor partners.
This is definitely possible, but it is going to take some effort and you will need a very seasoned middleware developer to make it happen. I am guessing a couple of weeks for a experienced middleware guru to complete this.
Good luck,
Stephen

Address Change in Customer/Vendor Master upon creation or change Master

Hi Expert,
We need to change some Address fields( *ADR6-SMTP_ADDR , ADRC-DEFLT_COMM, KNA1-TELTX, KNA1-TELX1*) in Customer Master based on some condition while creation/change the Master Data. I need to do same fields in Vendor Master as well.
I tried all the Possible exit Here.
If you know a Proper exit /BADI or one possible solution to solve my problem?
If anyone can provide any BAPI name which is used to Modify any customer/Vendor address will be very much helpful as well.
Thanks in Advance for your help.
Suman Adhikari

Hi Kesav,
For customer BAPI_"CUSTOMER_CHANGEFROMDATA" and "BAPI_CUSTOMER_CHANGEFROMDATA1" both Sales Organization is a required filed. Here we need to change some fileds(standard communication filed , Customer Email address, and Telex No) based on telex filed of customer for Customer irrespective of Sales Organization or any other constraints. The same requirement is for Vendor as well. If there is any proper exit/badi where KNA1 and address structure ADRC,ADR6 etc are available that will we good.
I just need to modify some address fields for customer as well as vendor. If there is any BAPI for change address(customer/Vendor) then that will also be helpful.
Suman Adhikari

Customer/Vendor Reconcilliation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for