Customized RF transaction for Confirmation of Transfer Order for WM

Hello everyone !
I need to develop a customized RF transaction for tcode LM05 and LT11. where i need to call custome screens for
1. Select transfer order - ( which will fetched from any handheld device like BARCODE scanner )
2. Navigate to screen SOURCE INFORMATION - Multiple Materials on pressing on NEXT button the control goes to
3. Destination Information - Multiple Materials and on ENTER pushbutton the TO gets confirmed.
Basically i need to create ZLM05 and do the above.
Please can any one provide the steps to achieve the above funcitonality ,
Thanks & Regards,

Solved

Similar Messages

Confirming a Transfer Order for RF

I am trying to find a BAPI or function module that will confirm a transfer order for use with a RF device. We have tried using a BDC, but it is too unreliable because of the limit on the number of handling units that it can do at 1 time from the same bin. If you have a way of confirming 30 or more handling units using transaction LT12 in a BDC, I will try that as well.
Thanks.
Edited by: Paul Sullivan on Jun 3, 2008 5:36 PM

Hello ,
you could try with BAPI_SHIPMENT_CHANGE,
but it's released and not documented. So, it's at own risk.
Regards Wolfgang

Auto Confirmation of transfer order - 999 mvt from storage type W01 to S01

Hi,
I am trying to automate the confirmation of transfer orders between storage type W01 and S01 using a 999 movement type. The 999 movement type appears to work perfectly when doing a bin to bin movement within the W01 storage type (for example move batch abc from bin 01 to bin 02) no confirmations are required. However if I transfer from a bin in W01 storage type to the S01 storage type (which only has a single bin to represent a staging area) a manual confirmation of the transfer order is required via lt24 or lt12. It appears therefore that the issue is with the storage type S01 for this particular Warehouse. The setting to confirm the TO immediately is already activated for movt 999 in customizing, is there a setting for the storage type that must be defined.
Regards,

F1 help for field V_T333-SQUIT:
Means that the transfer order item can be confirmed immediately during the creation procedure.
SAP online help:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
To set the confirmation requirement for foreground processing, select the indicator for TO item can be confirmed immediately.
As per my understanding the immediate confirmation indicator does not mean that the transfer order will be confirmed immediately. It makes possible that during the creation of transfer order you CAN put a flag in the confirmation checkbox.
If you use it together with "propose confirmation" flag (setting for WM movement type; V_T333-VQUIT), the falg in confirmation check box will be populated automatically during TO creation.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 10, 2011 11:22 AM

Error in confirmation of Transfer orders at Header level (TC LRF2)

Hello All,
A transfer order has single item. It has got confirmed at the item level for the full quantity. The confirmation switchbox at item level is checked in by the system automatically. But in header level the switch box is not checked in.
While trying to confirm the Transfer order at header level, the error message shows that the Transfer order is already confirmed. But the Transfer order still exists in LRF2.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Sasi.

Hi Marcos
Note 566995 is an old correction note, which is probably already implemented on your system but it describes the standard system design regarding confirmations posted in mass processing transactions:
When you enter an operation confirmation via the order info system or the mass processing the system now sets the confirmation type to 'Automatic final confirmation' as well as the indicator 'Post open reservations'. Thus the system automatically generates a final confirmation when you confirm the whole planned quantity and the operation receives status CNF (finally confirmed) instead of PCNF (partially confirmed).
System is designed that way because a mass processing transaction will be generally executed in background mode and a huge number of confirmations can be posted at the same time. Therefore, user will not be able to enter any value to the confirmation.
If you don't want this behaviour you could use the BAPI
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR to develop your own mass processing transaction to post confirmations.
BR
Caetano

User exits for delivery picking confirmation and transfer order creation

Hi
We have a scenario for which we need help.
This is to do with replenishment from plant to plant.
We have sales sets.
The sales sets needs to be replenished from one plant to another. We want the componenets of the sales sets to picked from the issuing plant. For this we need a transfer order. this needs tobe confirmed and then the goods issue should take place from the issuing plant. Its a two step process.
we are doing Sales sets in STO. The explosion takes place in STO. However when we create deliveries for this. Only the sales set header item without its components are flowing into the delivery.
The Tranfer order does not contain the components either.
However post the goods issue we can create a TO with reference to the TR. This is is not acceptable because we want the picking and confirmation to occur before PGI from the issuing plant.
Could anybody help: We want the TO to be created with the components even though in the delivery only the Sales set header appears. Can u suggest a user exit in which when we create the TR from the delivery the components of the set.
After confirmation of the TO then we want the picking status to be put as C.
Supreeth

Hi,
Check the following users exits.
MWMRFSSG            user exit for sorting TOs in RF system-guided transaction
MWMRFUP             Customer defined general purpose pushbutton called from scr.
MWMRP001            Cust. Exit for Fixed Bin Replenish.: Delivery Item Selection
MWMRP002            Cust. Exit for Fixed Bin Replenishment: TR Quantity Distr.
MWMRP003            Customer Exit for Replenishment using RLLNACH1
MWMRP004            User Exit for Replenishment using RLLNACH4
MWMTO001            Enhancements for end of transfer order generation
MWMTO010            Exit: Calculation of Total Planned TO Processing Time
MWMTO011            Correction of Planned Processing Time for TO Item
MWMTO012            Correction of Sorting and Split Transfer Order
MWMTO013            Stock Removal for Sev. Storage Types as in Stringent FIFO
MWMTOAU3            Separate selection of posting changes for autom.TO creation
MWMTR001            Exits at the end of transfer rqmnt creation (IM,PP interf.)
MWMD0001            Transfer order print via RLVSDR40
MWMD0002            Transfer order print as multiple process with RLKOMM40
MWMIDI07            Enhancement for Output WMPIHU (Create Pick-HU) Inbound
MWMIDO11            Enhancement for message WMTORD: TO with several items
MWMIDO12            Enhancement for Output WMPIHU (Pick-HUs) Outbound
MWMIDO13            Extension for WMMBXY (subsequent tasks after goods movement)
MWMPP001            Enhancement WM/PP Interface (automatic TR generation)
Regards,
Murali

Order Confirmation (PM) & Transfer Order (WM)

Hi all,
following this path
SPRO > Logistics Execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces Inventory > Management > Activate Automatic TO Creation
we have activated the automatic TO creation.
We have maintained the value "X" in the column "Indicator: Create transfer order immediately" for all the Movement types. Indeed, creating a good issue (from MIGO transaction) the system offers the OT screen.
But creating a good issue from the IW41 transaction (Create PM Order Confirmation) the system behaves differently.
How I can align the two behaviors? I don't want to retain the MM stock misaligned compared to the WM stock.
Thanks,
Marco.
Edited by: Marco Cariello on Jul 14, 2009 12:36 PM

How I can align the two behaviors? I don't want to retain the MM stock misaligned compared to the WM stock.
Generally, you cannot cause inconsistency between IM and WM stock via simple GI posting. If you detach your WH from an operating IM SLoc, you can cause...(just one example)
Is WM/PP interface switched on?
If yes, no TO is generated at the time of GI - SAP directly consumes it from the interim storage type 100. Reason is that TO creation is before GI in this case: TR is generated (e.g.) at the release of PrdOrd and processing that TR from LB10, you get the TO.
SPRO > LE > WM > Interfaces > Define Prdouction
I'm not sure but it can be a possible cause of the behaviour of the system you face...
Regards,
Csaba

Unwanted automatic confirmation of transfer order

Hi,
I am kind of out of good ideas. The problem is following:
I pick for production orders to fixed bins using several different WM movement types. When I am low on stock the production orders then cannibalizes on each other when picking in background. I dont have "propose confirmation" set in any of the WM movement types concerned.
Ex.
2 pcs are in interim storage type 914, then I generate a transfer order for interim storage type 924 (copy of 914), which picks from 914 and confirms automatically.
thanks for any ideas of what else to check.

Hi,
the thing I need to understand is:
1. why does the transfer order pick from another interim storage type in background.
2. why does this type of movement between interims auto-confirm
thanks

Warehouse management - how to de-confirm a transfer order item

This is probably not the best forum for the question, but you guys are the best so here goes:
In our warehouse we create transfer orders for picking. We can confirm them via LT12 to confirm the entire Transfer order, or use LT11 to confirm each item of the transfer order one at a time. Is there any way to de-confirm (IE cancel the confirmation that was previously done) for an item of the transfer order. It looks like our only option is to cancel the entire transfer order. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

HI
To confirm Transfer Order--LT12
Regards
Srinivas

Custom ITS transaction for Confirm goods/services in SRM

Hi Experts
i need to create a custom transaction same as standard one for confirm goods/servics in SRM portal.
In sap GUI, the transaction is BBPCF03
Can you please suggest any good sources where i can learn to Custome Tcodes for my requirement
Thanks in advance

Hi,
We can learn it from SAP standard cording. Go to SE80, Internet Service, BBPCF01.
Regards,
Masa

Two-step confirmation of Transfer order in WM

Hi
We are confirguring 2 step confirmation.
We have activated 2step conf, for the warehouse & marked corfirmation mandatory for the storage types,
However we are not able to perform confirmation for Pick & Transfer step.
Please let us know on how to configure two step confirmation.
Thanks,

Hello Abhay Desai,
Please kindly refer to SAP Library which has provided the following documentation on 2-step picking:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
I would suggest you to go through the prerequisites and steps in 2-steps pikcing in the given documentation. You should also be able to access to above with the following path:
http://help.sap.com >> SAP Library
--> SAP ERP Central Component
       --> Logistics
            --> Logistic Execution
                 --> Warehouse Management System
                      --> Goods Issue
                           --> Two Step Picking.
Hope the above helps. If question answered, please close and reward points. Otherwise feel free to get back.

Termination error while confirming the transfer order

Hi Csaba/Frenchy,
I am getting termination error while confirming or deleting the TO (TO is created out of a posting change notice). Upon confirmation, the system is giving a message that the TO is confirmed but when I try to go out of the TO confirmation screen (LT12), I get the update termination error resulting in TO not getting confirmed.
Could you pls advise how to go about resolving this issue. Matter urgent please.
regards,

One more idea: recreate the PCN (same number, ect) and set the fields via SE16N + &sap_edit as they are in the archived PCN. Else contact SAP AG how to solve.
(I do not know what is the standard solution for this - maybe before archiving belonging data such as open TOs should have been checked...)
Maybe other solution might be if you debug transaction LT12 and when it wants to refresh the PCN you eliminate this with the help of your ABAPer.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jul 29, 2008 7:43 PM

Automatic Confirmation of Transfer Order

Hello,
I have the following Scenario.
I have 3 Warehouses defined, 1 for Reception material, 2 for finished goods. And it supoused to have the same configuration parameters.
WH number 100 (Reception material area) when I do a movement with MB1A mvt type 201 or 261, and generate the TO via LT06, the TO is not confirmed.
But with the WH numbers 200 and 300 (finished goods area) doing the same example, Txn MB1A mov types 201 or 261, and generate the TO via LT06, the TO is automatically confirmed.
I just check the Automatic COnfirmation section and for the 3 Warehouse have same parameters.
What could be affecting? Will exist a user exit to control this?

Hi Marco,
Please check SAP online help how confirmation is controlled:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Please also check help in IMG:
SPRO > LE > WM > Activities > Confirmation
You will see that confirmation is coontrolled trough:
- warehouse ID (whether 2-step confirmation is allowed)
- storage type
- movement type
If your settings at movement type are the same and you experience different behaviour in your WHs, please check your settings of storage types.
SPRO > LE > WM > Activities > Confirmation - Storage type
You have to check settings of destinaton storage types (910; 914) in WH 100, 200, 300 as well as settings of source storage types.
If there's no difference please check transacton LT06 itself - if you execute it in foreground mode it is possible to put a flag in confirmation checkbox.
Please also check user exits in SE38. Here you can find list of possible user exits:
SPRO > LE > WM > Tools > Develop User Exits for WM
...or please switch to debug mode and check from where confirmation req. comes...
Regards,
Csaba

Nested Handling Units and Confirmation of Transfer Order - Pick HU

Friends & Gurus,
I have nested (low level) handling units and when confirming I would like one of the nested HU to become the pick-HU. So far I haven't been able. The pick-HU is always generated with a new number and if I try to assign manually one of the nested HU the systems says that the HU is not assigned to the TO.
Any comments or ideas will be appreciated.

I fully agree and thanks for coming back.
I can unpack the nested HU and then create a TO and select the unpacked HU (now a SU) as a full HU removal. I believe this is not operative, the idea is the operator gets to the big box, chooses (scans) one of the small box (nested) and confirms the TO. If somebody back at the office has first to unpack one of the nested HU (how could he know which one if there are 30 of them? Which one is on the top?) it makes it unviable.
Are we on sync?

Change in Transfer Order for Storage Type & bin

Hi,
I want to change destination bin change during TO Creation. Steps are given below.
a) SPRO : Storage type setting: Two options are t there in stock placement section
                 Storage bin cannot be changed during confirmation
1     Storage bin can be changed during confirmation
I set it to 1.
b) LT06 : TO Created.
c) LT12: TO Confirmation: TO lines are coming grayed out. We can not change Destination storage bin, storage type , and section.
Could you please advice me how to change TO Bins change during confirmation.
Clients requirement: System will pick bin automatically. Print will be taken for this. Once placement is done & some of material are not kept as per TO Bin number. its a different bin,. Now User want to change bin number during TO Confirmation.
Thanks ,
Gupta

Hi Gupta,
In WM customizing - master data - storage type - in the detail data of
the relevant destination storage type you set the flag
'Dst bin ch. during confirm.' from space to 1. Then the destination
storage bin "in general" can be changed at confirmation time.
Additionally you need to setup for the movement types that you are using
that you work with the new confirmation list, see detail of the movement
types, box screen control. (Try changing this setting to '1').
Please also read in the R/3 library - logistics - logistics execution -
warehouse management - warehouse movements - transfer orders - transfer
order confirmation - confirming transfer orders.
Here it is described when the destination bin can't be changed even
with the correct customizing settings.
If you set the indicator for Destination bin change during confirmation
for the desired storage type in Customizing for Warehouse Management
under Logistics Execution -> Warehouse Management -> Master Data ->
Define Storage Type, you will be able to change the destination bin when
confirming a transfer order if, for example, the destination bin
proposed by the system is damaged.
NO destination bin can be entered during confirmation for:
- dynamic coordinates
- return items
- Lean WM (if the destination bin is defined in the movement type)
- posting change TOs
- inventory based on putaway
- additions to existing stock in storage units
- transaction Confirm single item
Please check if your TO is related to one of these cases !!!
Regards,
Mauro

HU Identification error at the time of confirming Transfer order

Hi Guys
While confirming the Transfer order with respect to Outbound delivery
We are getting this error
Source storage unit we have provided is as per our naming convention : sea07+701
But it is giving this error :Enter a storage unit
HU identification field it is pointiong the cursor
CAn any body solve and suggest a solution?????????
Message no. L3216

Hi,
You need to enter the destination SU number as well. There is customizing in the storage type as well as the mvt to decide how the destination SU / HU needs to be determined (either copy source or take pick HU as destination HU for example).
MZ

Customized RF transaction for Confirmation of Transfer Order for WM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for