Daisy chain two MI424WR routers?

I've been googling but have been unsuccesful and my friendly automated Verizon CR pop up box has no clue what I'm asking him :-)
Given the configuration in our house, we can only hardwire into the FIOS Internet in one location (with a MI424WR router), and I need a hard connection at a 2nd location to activate my slingbox.
I have a 2nd MI424WR that I'd like to daisy chain to the 1st one, at the secondary location where I have the slingbox.  Once I have internet access at the 2nd location, I assume I can then get the slingbox working off of that internet signal at the 2nd router.
So....can anyone explain simply, step by step, how I can daisy chain the routers such that the 2nd router can piggyback on the 1st router's internet access?
Thanks so much - and the simpler and more straightforward the instructions, the better - I'm not the strongest techie in the world!

wOw! how confusing.   
Actually, Your 2nd Verizon Router can be turned into just a basic switch, so no need to go purchase anything. - To make it act like just a switch instead of a router, You need to access that router's configuration page and turn off the 'DHCP Server' function.
to do that you need to connect a computer to that 2nd router via an ethernet cable (Plug the power cord in for that router, but do NOT connect that router to the internet)  plug the cable from your computer into one of the 4 LAN ports on that router (not the WAN port)
open your internet browzer on the computer connected to that router and type in 192.168.1.1 in the address bar <- that should connect you to the page to enter the configuration pages of that router.
NOTE:  If you hold in the reset button on the back of that router for 15 seconds, then let it go and wait about 2 minutes before you try the above process,  you will have reset the default access codes on that router to make it easiest to gain access to....  the default login name = admin, and the default login password = password (or password1)    You may be directed to change the password the first time you access the router, but that is up to you if you want to change it.
Any way, log into the router    choose 'advanced' at the top, choose 'yes' you want to proceed, then look for 'IP Address Distribution' in the main part of the screen, open that,   you should see something like 'Network (Home\Office)' and on that same line out to the right you see a box labled 'Action'  - click on that 'Action' box and another box opens.  AT the top of that new box you see a listing for 'Services' and under that the only service listed should be 'IP Address Distribution'  with a drop down menu to the right.  By default it should say "DHCP Server".   Click on the drop down menu and choose 'disable'.   Then click on 'APPLY' at the bottom, then choose "logout" on the left.    
NOTE:   If you ever need to reset that router, it goes back to the default settings, which makes it a DHCP server again.  (There is a way to 'save' your current configuration to the computer the Router is attached to, so that you can 'restore' the current settings in the future without needing to go through all the steps here.) 
after you have completed this, you need to connect the ethernet cable coming FROM your 1st router (which is the one assigning IP addresses) [plugged into one of the 4 LAN ports on the first router]  to the second router by plugging that into the WAN port of the second router.    Then connect an ethernet cable from one of the LAN ports on the 2nd router to your device.
Your device will then receive an IP address.
NOTE:    The easiest, fastest way to have all this 'just work', will be to turn off the first router BEFORE you connect the second router to it.    Turn off all devices connected to the first router.   Have your 2nd router turned off as well as whatever you are going to be connecting to the 2nd router.   TURN everything off.    Then make all the connections.  Then FIRST turn on the first (main) router.   wait until you have the internet light is green on that first router before you turn anything else on.  SECOND, turn on the second router and wait until the internet light on it is green on it before you turn on anything else.    Then turn on whatever devices.   It should all just work.
cjacobs001

Similar Messages

  • How do I daisy chain two wireless routers?

    I have recently got a new wireless router from O2- Thomson router, "G"
    This is set up at main BT socket as primary wi-fi router.
    I wish to add two of my old routers as a daisy chain just to extend the range to those rooms where reception is poor.
    One is a Thomson speedtouch 576, other is a Sagem provided by Sky. Both are "G".
    help me with step by step instructions if you can please?
    Thanks in anticipation.
    Regards

    Welcome to the discussion area!
    Are you planning to connect all of your routers using ethernet cables? If yes, then you need to place the Thompson and Sagem devices into "bridge" mode. If no, then you need to contact support for Thompson and Sagem regarding your products.
    Since this is the discussion area for the AirPort Express, AirPort Extreme and Time Capsule, we will not able to provide you with any details about the configuration of Thompson or Sagem products.

  • Can I daisy chain two Thunderbolt displays to the new MacBook Airs (July 2011)?

    I have last year's MacBook Air -- probably the best Mac I've ever had and I've had a few. I looked at using multiple displays last year, but the reviews for the major 3rd-party solutions really demonstrate how little is possible.
    I see Apple says you can double up on displays for the MacBook Pro (I have a pre-Thunderbolt one unfortunately), what about the new (July 2011) MacBook Airs?
    Anyone tried? Anyone know?
    (I have a 30" Dell display, but it is, and always has been, very flakey when it comes to connecting to a Mac laptop).

    You can thank Intel for that.
    The sandy bridge chips all have integrated graphics, and before they were released -- they took nvidia to court claiming they didn't have a "license" to make GPU chipsets for the sandy bridge line.  Intel won, and consumers lost.
    The solution most manufacturers are using for notebooks is graphics switching (nvidia optimus like technology) -- which basically uses a discreet GPU along side the intel integrated GPU, and switches between the two instantaenously based on the workload and \ or battery life -- this is how the macbook pro's with the ATI gpus work.
    Since there isn't enough space physically inside a macbook air for a discreet GPU, and since no company in the world is allowed to make a shared GPU for intel's sandy bridge chipsets -- the only solution is to use the integrated graphics that is in the processors -- Intel HD 3000.  Intel basically has the monopoly here...there is no legal solution in the world another company can provide thanks to our wonderful court system
    Wanna know the really sad part about the Intel HD 3000 GPU?  The Nvidia 320M (the GPU used in the previous model 2010 macbook air -- chip was released to the market in April of last year) actually out performs it in some benchmarks -- that's right, a 1+ year old shared gpu from nvidia outperforms Intel's 2011 integrated graphics.
    Intel ***** at graphics, period.
    The only other solution I can think of is for you to get the "Echo Express" product from Sonnet:
    http://www.sonnettech.com/product/thunderbolt/index.html
    It's basically an external bay that will allow you to put a PCIe GPU inside it, and it would then connect via thunderbolt to the macbook air.
    You would then use the minidisplayport connectors on the PCIe GPU to connect to the apple displays -- I believe any modern ATI or Nvidia GPU can support up to 3 or 4 external displays.
    Unfortunately, sonnet's bay is not released yet, and you'd also have to make sure the PCIe GPU you get supports both thunderbolt AND os x....so yeah, kind of slim pickens right now
    EDIT:
    So apparently the macbook pros can daisy chain two thunderbolt displays -- Apple has a picture of it on their site:
    http://storeimages.apple.com/1867/as-images.apple.com/is/image/AppleInc/MC914_AV 7?wid=1200&hei=1200&fmt=jpeg&qlt=95&op_sharpen=0&resMode=bicub&op_usm=0.5,0.5,0, 0&iccEmbed=0&layer=comp
    I just bought a new mac air too...I was gonna get a mbpro but they are just too expensive -- the one I configured was at around 3000$
    Wanna know what's lame about using the thunderbolt display with the mac air?  So the new mac air has the magsafe connector on one side and the thunderbolt connector on the other -- they're not on the same side like the macbook pro is (see picture) -- so basically the cable is going to have to slack around the back of the macbook air -- who designed that?  Must have been smoking some good meth ;p
    Message was edited by: NiqueXyZ

  • Daisy chain two display port monitors (Dell U2913WM) to new Mac mini Thunderbolt?

    Everything I read said that I could hook up a display port monitor to a Thunderbolt port on the mac mini.  I purchased two display port monitors (Dell U2913WM) that can be daisy chained, and hooked them up.  All I get is mirroring.  Does anyone know how to turn off mirroring with this setup?  I did not get the "uncheck mirroring" option in preferences until I hooked up the second via the HDMI port instead of a daisy chain.  The problem with that is, I cannot take advantage of the full resolution through the HDMI.  It seems I have wasted my money on two monitors.
    Looking for advice on:
    1) How to daisy chain these two Dell monitors to the mac mini and turn off mirroring and use an extended desktop, or
    2) How to take advantage of the full resolution through HDMI port?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks!

    So re-reading this thread, I now realize you did exactly what I wanted to do but your issue was having a cloned vs. extended desktop. Oops!
    I believe your "nothing plugged in" issue is the cable. I'm not sure that TB cables are backwards compatible with DP - I think it's only the ports. Do you see multiple monitors in "System Preferences > Displays" if you hook the monitors up like you described in your OP?
    My Dell U2713H arrived today and it works like a charm with the supplied Mini-DP to DP cable. The built-in display on my 13" mid 2009 MBP still works if not in clamshell mode, although I will mostly use mine in my HengeDock. In the OSD of the monitor, you can access "Display Settings > Display Info" and it will show you the DP capability. Mine is only DP 1.1a and I believe to run 2 of these at full resolution you will need the bandwidth in DP 1.2 which includes MST (daisy-chaining). This could be your problem.
    Can you access the same menu in your OSD and report back what your DP compatability is?
    Thanks!
    mgb

  • Daisy chain two external drives via Firewire, then connect one via USB to the TC?

    Hi,
    I have two external drives that have both Firewire and USB ports. My 1st generation 500 gb Time Capsule (maybe all of them?) only has USB ports so up til now, I have connected one or the other drive via USB. (I've tried to connect both to a powered USB hub but one drive has problems showing up. At this point I only use the one drive that shows up and connect it directly with no hub to the Time Capsue.)
    My question is: Can I daisy chain the two drives via Firewire and then connect one of them (probably the one that has no problems connecting with USB) to the Time Capsule via USB?
    Second, somewhat-related problem...
    I don't know why one drive isn't connecting very well when directly connected to the Time Capsule. Both are Fantom drives. One is a 1TB, the one that has prblems connecting is a 250GB. I've tried connecting directly or through a powered hub. The 1B has no problems, the 250 gb won't show up most of the time and disconnects itself fairly quickly if it does connect. I've switched cables; that hasn't helped. The 1TB stays connected most of the time but sometimes it disconnects too. I suspect the Time Capsule just isn't able to deal with external drives so I don't puch it. It would be nice to be able to have both drives accessable through the TC though.
    Thanks for any help.
    Cheers,
    John

    Doing some experimentation, connecting the drives directly to the MBP:
    - Neither of the two drives Firewire daisy-chained and going through the powered USB hub connected to the MBP mount. I was using old aliases on desktop.*They don't show up on network otherwise. (Each drive self-mounts with both Firewire and USB direct connections.)
    *Even after making new aliases, neither drive will mount using their new aliases when directly connected (not through hub) with USB or Firewire (and Thunderbolt adapter.) That's weird.
    - Both the 240 gb and the 1TB drives going through powered hub connected to MBP mount by themselves.
    - Two drives daisy-chained via Firewire and one drive connected to the MBP via Firewire (and Thunderbolt adapter) self-mount. No surprise there but that doesn't help me as I want to have the drives further away from the MBP and connected to the Time Capsule, which doesn't have a Firewire port anyway...
    - All of the USB and the Firewire cables work as does the Thunderbolt adapter. I tested them.
    I wonder.... I have a Firewire to what appears to be an Ethernet connector. I wonder if that would be any good. I'm afraid to try it though...

  • Mac Mini 2009 - Can't daisy chain two FW800 drives

    I have two FW800 enclosures with 3.5-inch drives and external power.
    Each one mounts individually when connected to the Mini FW800 port but when I daisy-chain them the second one in the chain doesn't mount and is not seen by disk utility.
    Those enclosures use an Oxford UF934DSB chipset.
    What's ironic that I had a FW400 enclosure daisy chained to one FW800 enclosure until this afternoon and that daisy-chain worked fine.
    Somewhere on the net there was an article that the daisy-chaining had to be done in a certain sequence, ie Mac FW to top FW port on first external, then from bottom of first FW enclosure to top of second and so forth.
    I always though the FW ports were just wired in parallel.
    Well, this is interesting - since these new FW800 enclosures also have one FW400 port as well, I just connected the second one using the FW400 ports and now they both mount.
    But now the whole chain only runs at FW400 speeds.
    Anyone else come across this problem or better yet, what is the solution to get both daisy-chained FW800 drives to mount.
    The enclosures are Rosewell, the drive in each a 1.5 TB WD green.

    I don't think it has anything to do with the power supply.
    The two enclosures are identical and react (work or not) exactly the same when I interchange them or the FW cable.
    They also work flawlessly if I connect the second one using FW400 instead of FW800. Would just trying to get the enclosure to mount with FW800 draw more current than when mounting with FW400 to put the power brick over the edge? I doubt it.
    A few other things I'm going to try - I do this when I have a few extra minutes since I can't afford to spend my time on this continuously.
    1. See if there is a F'W update for the enclosure and/or the Oxford chip.
    2. Talk to the Oxford and enclosure support people
    3. Update to 10.6.4, I'm on 10.6.2 right now
    4. Do a bit more digging on the net to see how others got the FW800 daisy-chaining working.
    The two enclosures react the same when I try each one separately and also when I switch them around. Whatever the problem is, it affects both equally so it's not some defect on one of them.
    With the rest of the testing I have done, I'm now pretty sure it's a Mac software problem.
    Although I would have thought someone else would have this problem as well but I can't even find any discussion on daisy-chaining with this chipset when running OS 10.6.
    There is a 15-digit number in disk utility called connection ID.
    I assume that is the Firewire ID number that some threads I read refer to.
    That ID is the same for the two FW800 ports and the FW400 port on each enclosure but it's different for the two enclosures, so some conflict there is definitely not the issue.
    So far I couldn't find what the latest issue of firmware is for the Oxford chip set, but I copied all the information that comes up with the firewire hardware listing so when I find the information I can check it against the firmware issue on my two units.
    Now, another interesting tidbit - some people say they had to power up the enclosure a few times occasionally to get a single drive to mount.
    I never had that problem, a single FW800 drive always mounted right away, but I decided to try that with the daisy-chained drive.
    So I turned the power switch on that second drive off and then on again...and lo and behold - doesn't it mount now........
    But that is not the interesting tidbit........the tidbit is when I check back in the Mini Firewire hardware listing.
    Whereas before it showed all the expected detail with either drive when connected individually via FW800, now with both FW800 drives connected I get this:
    *FireWire Bus:*
    *Warning: Unable to list FireWire devices.*
    *Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec*
    ....and oooops - both FW800 drives just disconnected by themselves.
    Sure seems to point to a Mac software issue.
    And if you google for "Warning: Unable to list FireWire devices." you get pages of hits - many on Leopard but also a fair share on SL.
    I updated the software to 10.6.4 - still the same problem.
    Daisy-chain with FW400 is fine, with FW800 the second drive in the chain - doesn't matter which one it is, won't mount.

  • Can I use two MI424WR routers in one house?

    Hello, I currently have one Fios provided router in my home but I need to move it so that the wireless signal reaches my master bedroom, which right now it doesn't, but if I were to move my router to another room I would be forced to move my computer desk and unfortunately I can't do that right now.  My question is can I acquire a second MI424WR router in which I can attach via coax cable and use it as a nonwireless router, by turning off the wireless, so I can use for internet access for my home PC that is connected via ethernet cable?  Thanks for any help.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    myikul wrote:
    I found this online after some research:
    Verizon Coaxial Network Adapter
    Model #: ECB2200V
    I understand that I can use this adapter to get my signal to the computer but is it possible to use another router instead?  I ask because this network adapter has only one Ethernet jack and costs almost $80.  The MI424WR routers are like $30 on ebay and have 4 ethernet ports.  The ethernet ports are important to me because I have two computers at my desk and sometimes link a third.
    Yes if you only plan on using it as a MOCA bridge and switch. I would say the ones on Ebay are older and perhaps Rev, A-D and are not very good as a router with the newer speeds. Even as a WiFi access point for a second location, it might not work as well as the latest Rev. I.
    Just be sure you set the DHCP to off, do not use the WAN port, and be sure to set the LAN port to a different address other that the default 192.168.1.1, which would cause conflicts with your existing router. Use a decent bi-directional splitter at the new location to split the coax.
    This site may help. http://www.dslreports.com/faq/16077

  • Daisy chaining two Lacie Firewire 800 drives on a G%

    I've had one external drive working perfectly for months. Tried to daisy chain a second drive and can't get the second drive to register on my desktop. Support said to reboot. My system freezes upon shutting down. If I restart with the two connected, neither drives shows and my Eye TV shuts down. As soon as I disconnect the second drive, Eye TV works and the one drive appears. Any suggestions? Apple Care had none except purchasing a port that would handle firewire 800. How trustworthy would that be?

    I've tried daisychaining a new d2 Big Disk Extreme FW800 and a d2 FW800 drive on my G5's FW 800 bus. I can't copy files from one drive to the other without an Error -36 code. I CAN copy to and from the drives to the Mac at nice fast speeds with no errors. Both LaCie drives are updated to their latest firmware, respectively.
    The few times that I was able to copy a small folder from the d2 to the Big Disk, it took forever.
    As a result of this thread, I'm now awaiting the delivery of a Belkin FW800 3 port hub. I hope this will clear up this issue, as I need to be able to move data between the two drives (both of which passed their tests via Disk Utility, Drive Genius, and DiskWarrior in flying colors).
    I have noticed the older d2 FW800 has a lower firmware number than the Big Disk, however, the LaCie Update Tool reports that each drive is at its current appropriate firmware number. And yes, I ran the Update Tool independently on each drive, while the other was unmounted and unplugged.
    Any advice?

  • Daisy chaining two TCs?

    I have an older 500GB TC and a new 500GB one. If I turn off the router part of the old one can I daisy chain it with the new one and have 1 TB of wireless Time Machine backup capability?

    Unfortunately, there is not a "seamless" or "automatic" way to do this.
    But yes, you can use one computer on the two Time Capsules, but you will have to manually tell your computer which device to use. Make sure that each Time Capsule has a different name.
    Let the current backups continue until TC#1 is close to full.
    Then, click System Preferences on the dock and choose Time Machine
    Click Change Disk
    Click TC#2 to highlight it
    Click Use for backups
    The downside here is that TC#2 will see your computer as a "new" device and it will do a complete backup of the computer and then incremental Time Machine backups after that.
    If you want to go back in time on TC#1, you will need to do the same reset mentioned above and select TC#1.
    Be sure to reset to TC#2 after you are done with TC#1.

  • Can you daisy chain two Compact DAQ systems together?

    Greetings everyone,
    I have a signal conditioning application and I have been looking at the Compact DAQ Platform as a solution.
    I have a total of 16 TC's channels, a few DIO and a few Analog Out requirements.
    I can basicly meet these needs with a single cDAQ system but I would like to have room to expand more in the future.
    Does anyone know if it is possible daisy chain more than one cDAQ system together or if it woudl be very difficult to program and run two seperate DAQ systems from my computer.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Thomas

    alkaline3mc wrote:
    NI, the home of dead links.... 
    You probably noticed that these posts were written 9 years ago...
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • Daisy chain two La Cie hard drives through time capsule usb

    my time capsule runs oNe la cie 350GB through the usb great
    can i daisy chain (firewire a 1 TB d2 la cie through the 350) and still see both and access from network in finder???

    can i daisy chain (firewire a 1 TB d2 la cie through the 350) and still see both and access from network in finder???
    Sorry, but I really don't think this is something that the TC's USB port & File Sharing function would be able to support.
    Have you tried this combination connected directly to your computer? ... and did it work?

  • Daisy-chaining two G5's

    Hi,
    I seem to remember hearing that you can daisy-chain multipe G5's to create a system, utilixing all the components of al the machines. Is this a fact and how can I do it?
    Thanks

    Cool.
    I am still a bit confused though. IS Xgrid a separate program or is it integrated in leopard? If I get itgoing, will it be useful to me, I am an audio engineer, and I was hoping it could boost my processing power and available ram to make mixing tasks faster and more efficient, enabling me to use more and more powerful plug-in effects. Will connecting my other G5 through Xgrid accomplish this seeing as I would only be using one program? It seemed like the function of Xgrid was to spread different tasks across the different computers in the cluster, does an audio program (f.ex. Pro Tools) apply as a single or multiple tasks?
    Sorry for the questions, it just seems almost to good to be true :P I am new to the wonders of Apple.
    Thanks,

  • Daisy-chaining two WRT54G's

    Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible for me to use two WRT54G routers in line in a certain set up.
    The first WRT54G is currently on the first floor connected to the cable modem and this what is now used for my home wireless network... and with this I would like it to remain operating in that capacity.
    I have a second WRT54G that I would like to put on the second floor (hardwired to the first one with a single 100' ethernet cable) to be used as a "switch" that I could hardwire two gaming PC's to. I don't really have any concerns about the second unit providing any sort of wireless network support. as the first unit can reach every device in my home with full signal.
    I was told that this is entirely possible to do. But I just have no idea how to go about setting it up. Is it as easy as just wiring it all together and powering up? Or will the second router require some modification to make it operate correctly?
    I sketched up a (crude) diagram to show what I'm looking for
    Message Edited by HiFiSi on 10-22-2009 02:47 PM
    Message Edited by HiFiSi on 10-22-2009 02:48 PM
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Follow instructions here
    CLICK THIS
    "Sometimes your knight in shining armor is just a retard in tin foil.."-ARCHANGEL_06

  • If I daisy chain two Thunderbolt Displays to a 2011 iMac 27" can I connect a Wacom Cintiq HD to the other Thunderbolt port?

    In one Thunderbolt port are the two Thunderbolt displays, in another Thunderbolt port is the Cintiq HD. Would this work on an iMac 27".

    Looks like 2 external displays are the max, even for the 2-port (TB) iMac.  So if the Cintiq shows up in ASP and is considered by the computer as a display, then NO, you won't be able to use the Wacom Cintiq in 'addition' to (2) TB displays.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4885

  • Can I daisy chain two mac pros so that I'm using one monitor and keyboard

    Can I use two mac pro's with one monitor, keyboard & mouse? The two different machines have two different operating systems (Snow Leopard / Lion). One machine is brand new and the other is 5 or 6 years old.
    I want to use both machines in tandem so that I can leave something to render while I work on something else.

    KVM is an answer -- maybe.  I use one for two machines to share one of my monitors (a VGA) and my keyboard (the second older machine seems to have sleep problems if I share a usb mouse on the kvm however).
    The trickiest part of choosing a kvm is trying to find one that can handle the video; one that can handle the required bandwidth, and the connections.  If one computer uses, say DVI, and the other mini-displayport, then you need to figure out which kvm can handle that with one (or both) of the machines using adapter(s). 
    You said one of the machines is brand new.  Then it probably has thunderbolt.  So you would need a mini-displayport, dvi, or vga adapter depending on the monitor.  That means the older machine will need a similar connection since whatever kvm you get will have the same kind of ports for both inputs and its output.
    A wild card here (at least in my mind) is if the newer machine has thunderbolt.  While a mini-displayport display can be plugged into a TB connection, it is not clear that such a thing will work through a kvm.  That is unknown territory I think at this point.

Maybe you are looking for