Date Issue

Hello,
I am a little stuck on a date issue. I need to calculate something like this for a selection criteria formula:
I need to return this:
Today is CurrentDate (11/8/2011) - therefore I want to return or calculate next Sunday 11/13/2011 then add 6 days to
11/13/2011 - 11/19/2011
So, in English I'd need
> 11/8/2011 (CurrentDate), find Next Sunday's date (11/13/2011) add 6 days to next Sunday's date (11/13/2011) to get 11/19/2011

dayofweek(currentdate)
will give the the day number of the date (1 is Sunday)
You can use this to generate the dates you need.
For instance,
if dayofweek(currentdate)=2 then currentdate + 6
will give you the next Sunday's date
Debi
Edited by: Debi Herbert on Nov 8, 2011 11:44 AM:
Sorry Ian, I guess was working on this the same time you were. I was just a little slower than you (I had to look it up in my master report of formulas)

Similar Messages

  • Data Issue

    Hi All ..
               We are facing one data issue DSO.  One record is worngly loaded with some project iD ( Ex record is having ID GE1234 insted of having LE4423) remaining details are same . we are loading the data furtherly to master data table from the DSO. if i try  for reporting for project id LE4423 ,information not avilable because it is heaving wrong ID,it is key also.But in the Source system (CFG) side Data is correct with ID LE4423.
             In update rule we are following one to one mapping for all infoobjects.My requirement is i need to have in my DSo LE4423 . I need to overwrite the record id GE1234 with LE4423 without affecting other fields in the record.
            Shall i load till PSA with the ID LE4423 ..then if load this single record to DSO will overwrite the GE1234 by choosing other field as key field.  but we are following one to one mapping in update rule.
    Please help me on this. i need to hev a correct id for record.
    Thanks ,
    Prem.

    You can use selective deletion to delete the record with Project ID = GE1234
    Load the data till PSA
    Load the data to DSO using selection Project ID = LE4423 in DTP from PSA.
    check in further data targets also for mismatch of data
    Hope it helps,
    Naveen Vytla
    Edited by: Naveen Vytla on Nov 18, 2008 10:49 AM

  • Custom report -Mb51 -EBELN,AUFNR,KDAUF & KUNNR -Data issues

    Hi,
    This custom report is related to material document list (MB51).
    I was trying to retrieve Purchase Order(EBELN),Order number(AUFNR),Sales order(KDAUF) & Ship-to-party( KUNNR) from MSEG & MKPF.
    Unfortunately
    It looks like for Sales Orders, it picks up the Customer Number but no Order Number. For STO’s, it looks like it picks up the STO # but no Customer #.
    How to over come this?
    FYI..I also tried adding fields to standard report(MB51) and it is also doing the same manner .
    Am I pulling it from Wrong tables? or is it related to DATA issues?
    Regards
    Praveen
    Message was edited by:
            PRAVEEN s

    Hi,
    This custom report is related to material document list (MB51).
    I was trying to retrieve Purchase Order(EBELN),Order number(AUFNR),Sales order(KDAUF) & Ship-to-party( KUNNR) from MSEG & MKPF.
    Unfortunately
    It looks like for Sales Orders, it picks up the Customer Number but no Order Number. For STO’s, it looks like it picks up the STO # but no Customer #.
    How to over come this?
    FYI..I also tried adding fields to standard report(MB51) and it is also doing the same manner .
    Am I pulling it from Wrong tables? or is it related to DATA issues?
    Regards
    Praveen
    Message was edited by:
            PRAVEEN s

  • Consistent Data Issues Even After Replacement

    I don't know whether to blame the phone or the ice cream sandwich update for all the problems I have been having with my RAZR. When I first got it six months ago it was great and I loved it now after the ice cream sandwich update I dont really like it anymore. I never had any sort of issues while using it on gingerbread. Today, I have seen my phone switch constantly between 3g and 4g more times than I can count over the course of half an hour. I couldn't even get a consistent signal to watch a 3 minute youtube clip.
    First off, I updated it to ICS but first wiped the phone clean including cache, etc. So it would have basically been a clean install. Now, I have certain issues. The 4g and 3g switch is terrible. On the street and in my own house I have had the same thing happen. In my house I get anywhere from 3-5 bars of 4g but it still switches over to 4 bars of 3g. I have even seen it switch from 4g to 3g when I had full bars. I have already replaced the sim cards, but I am still having these issues. It's actually happening on all 4 of my RAZRs on my family plan. I have gone through the network resets where I pull out the sim card and for 30 seconds, insert it, power on the phone, etc. I went through all 4 of them with the Rep over the phone. I have also had several instances where I did not have data but signal bars and then I didn't have absolutely anything at all. I live in a "major" city metro area, Boston, and I can't believe I am having these problems.
    At first I would have gone off and blamed Verizon, but it is definitely not Verizon, it is our phones that are terrible. I can confirm this because my brother uses an ipad (4g Verizon) on a separate account and he consistently maintains 4g even though I have seen it go as low as two bars. Yes, I understand the ipad is a different device and may have a different radio, but that is exactly how our phones used to work on gingerbread. I received a replacement device and I am still having the same issues. Also, the headset speaker, not the speaker on the back, or receiver is really tinny during phone calls even with the in call volume down half way. It is really annoying and the little tone that plays after hanging up makes the speaker sound like its about to blow out. I don't know what to do if the RAZR will keep having data issues because this is absolutely ridiculous. I know i'm not entitled to anything but for $310 a month I mean come on, I just want my phone to work properly. As I am typing this now, I have witnessed my phone switch between 4g, 3g, and no signal at least 5 times and of course my brother's iPad on Verizon has kept its 4g signal.

    Thanks for all the suggestions, but they just don't work at all guys. I've even tried that restore connectivity app from Motorola, but of course it didn't work. I don't like that I keep having constant switches between 3g,4g, and no signal bars. It's awful thats just what it is. I feel like I got gipped with this update promising better user experience. If the darned thing can't connect to their network, then what is Verizon doing to address these issues? Every time I try to do something "data intensive" (i.e. youtube, facebook, twitter, etc) the data signal just drops and I'm either left with gray bars and no data or no signal bars whatsoever. Also one thing that annoys me to death with this phone is that I have it sitting in my pocket after I lock the screen and I go to pull it out of my otherwise empty pocket. The screen is turned on by itself (I have the clear silicon case on it so the power button shouldn't be pressed by itself and no I don't wear skinny jeans), its got 3g and no bars, and its piping hot.
    WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PHONE VERIZON???!!!

  • Master data Issue  ---   materials have unassigned or # values ...!!

    Hello Experts,
    I am facing an issue that the Customer Data is missing in a BEx Report.
    Data Flow is   2LIS_13_VDITM  --> DSO1 --> Merging DSO -->  Cube --> Multiprovider --> Bex Report.
    Exact issue is Customers in the Bex Report  has unassigned to Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District.
    The only reason a customer should show up under u201Cunassignedu201D or u201C#u201D is if itu2019s improperly set up in the system.
    customers are assigned with two values. one which has data and the other which has unassigned value.
    I wanted to know, how do i check if the matierials are valid to have unassigned Values ?
    Checked the Merging DSO and saw that there are actually values assigned values for the affected matierials.
    After that checked the Cube data values are displayed except the Master Data values.
    I guess..its completely related to Master data. I would like to know how can i resolve this issue.
    Please reply me if you face this kind of master data issue in your expeiriance.
    Thanks,
    SN.

    Hi,
    Are Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District are attributes of Customer?
    In case they are, then the customers will be unassigned to Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District in case the data for these attributes is loaded to the customer attributes.
    and also check if the customer characteristic is properly assigned in the multiprovider.
    Check if it helps.
    Regards,
    Joe

  • OBIEE 11g .0d date issue

    Hi,
    I create an initialization block to populate a couple of repository variables.
    After saving the RDP the value for the default initializer changes from 2011 to 2011.0d
    I have been using several workaround. But I need some permanent fix in rpd itself. Can anyone point to some Oracle Document? Is this issue been resolved in latest release of OBIEE. I am using 11.1.1.6.6.
    Workaround Ref : The .0d date issue
    Re: OBIEE 11.1.1.6.2 BP1 Repository Variable data type

    Have you gone through my suggestions at the below links?
    The .0d date issue
    Re: OBIEE 11.1.1.6.2 BP1 Repository Variable data type
    You have to do it where ever you are using that rep. variable not in the init block.

  • Verizon mades changes in the coding and now Windows Phone 7 is having data issues!!!

    Starting about 3 weeks ago, I stopped receiving text messages and even worse stopped receiving calls yet alone my voicemails.  I have changed not one thing to my phone, everything is exactly the way it was before the issues arised.  Now I have to trick my phone to receive my data by dialing into my voicemail...  And then what do you know, 30 text mesages, 12 voicemails!!!
    The voicemails wont even tell you the date or time stamp (the time the voicemail was received).  After numerous *228 and talking with level 2 over the holidays, I see a huge article on multiple news sites stating Verizon is having data issues...  Dropped calls, loss of data, no signal while all our phone keep showing full bars and 3g.  Verizon stated its only happening on there 4gLTE system and not 3G but thats a load of crap.
    All one has to do is a google search of loss of text messages or voicemails on Verizon and you will see 100's up to 1000's of users like you and me all experiencing the same issues.  And not just with Windows Phone 7, but with there baby Driod and iPhone as well.
    What really ****** me off is that Verizon loves to play the blame game or pass the buck game.  Hard Reset your phone and that will solve the problem...  Yeah Right.  If this was our OS and we updated a driver that changed the OS in the background I can see that being the solution.  But for the 100's or 1000's of users that go to work daily, check there emails and text daily, and haven't changed one thing on the phone... THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE!!!
    Now I read an articile for someone extermely close to Microsoft stating that Verizon turned down Nokia's new 4GLTE phone because they have no faith in the operating system and I have to think that maybe behind the scenes Verizon is trying to force us off Windows Phone 7 platform with data issue behind the scene and try to get us all into the Droid Platform which they make 50% of the cash off the phone just like the iPhone...
    This is a joke, and I am really starting to think about going to ATT and getting the HTC Titan or the new Nokia 900.  I have already research a 3 party app that will allow you to backup and restore your phone.  And just read that Microsoft just put out an ad for backup, restore and cloud backup programmers for this latest feature.
    Verizon the games need to stop, Verizon you need to stand behind this Platform, Verizon you need to provide better service for all us 3G users!!!
    TheJester77

    Starting about 3 weeks ago, I stopped receiving text messages and even worse stopped receiving calls yet alone my voicemails.  I have changed not one thing to my phone, everything is exactly the way it was before the issues arised.  Now I have to trick my phone to receive my data by dialing into my voicemail...  And then what do you know, 30 text mesages, 12 voicemails!!!
    The voicemails wont even tell you the date or time stamp (the time the voicemail was received).  After numerous *228 and talking with level 2 over the holidays, I see a huge article on multiple news sites stating Verizon is having data issues...  Dropped calls, loss of data, no signal while all our phone keep showing full bars and 3g.  Verizon stated its only happening on there 4gLTE system and not 3G but thats a load of crap.
    All one has to do is a google search of loss of text messages or voicemails on Verizon and you will see 100's up to 1000's of users like you and me all experiencing the same issues.  And not just with Windows Phone 7, but with there baby Driod and iPhone as well.
    What really ****** me off is that Verizon loves to play the blame game or pass the buck game.  Hard Reset your phone and that will solve the problem...  Yeah Right.  If this was our OS and we updated a driver that changed the OS in the background I can see that being the solution.  But for the 100's or 1000's of users that go to work daily, check there emails and text daily, and haven't changed one thing on the phone... THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE!!!
    Now I read an articile for someone extermely close to Microsoft stating that Verizon turned down Nokia's new 4GLTE phone because they have no faith in the operating system and I have to think that maybe behind the scenes Verizon is trying to force us off Windows Phone 7 platform with data issue behind the scene and try to get us all into the Droid Platform which they make 50% of the cash off the phone just like the iPhone...
    This is a joke, and I am really starting to think about going to ATT and getting the HTC Titan or the new Nokia 900.  I have already research a 3 party app that will allow you to backup and restore your phone.  And just read that Microsoft just put out an ad for backup, restore and cloud backup programmers for this latest feature.
    Verizon the games need to stop, Verizon you need to stand behind this Platform, Verizon you need to provide better service for all us 3G users!!!
    TheJester77

  • Data issue in IDOC

    Hi Experts,
    I do the following steps to generate IDOC for Passing over payroll data to ADP.
    I run the payroll and Run the coombined Payroll export and go to WE05 to chk for idoc.
    I have some data issue here. I need the IDOC to Pick 0167 infotype information. For few employees if does generate but for few it does not generate the info in IDOC. Please help me as to how to navigate this problem as iam very new to payroll and as weel as IDOc's.
    Thanks
    Chowdary

    Hello,
    Please try your luck with this.
    Go to BD87 see the error message why this idoc is not moved. some time retrying will you success.
    else also you find the problem in the error message.
    thanks

  • Date issue in processing billing documents that shipped in a prior period

    Date issue in processing billing documents that shipped in a prior period that is now closed:
    SAP values those deliveries with the current document date in A/R when it should be the original delivery date.  Baseline date needs to stay the delivery date, but is getting copied from the billing date in the new period.  A user exit exists (& needs to be applied) to manipulate the baseline date when the accounting document is being created.
    Any input is appreciated.

    Hi
    Try with Invoice Correction Request concept
    Sale document Type: RK
    Reference Document Type : Billing Number
    for Understanding the Invoice Correction request check below link
    [Creating Invoice Correction Requests|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/dd/55feeb545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm]
    Regards,
    Prasanna

  • Overlap date Issue 0hrposition_attr

    Hi
    I'm facing one records overlap date Issue with 0hrposition_attr.Out of 4  records one records i'm getting as start date as future date and end date as past date.I checked in the source i did not see such records.Due to this issue the records are not updated in the target.But i did not notice such issue with 0hrposition_Text  and 0HRPOSITION_CCTR_ATTR load went fine with out any over lap.
    Eg:
    POSITION          VALID FROM          VALID TO
    12345678            04/01/2014            04/20/2014
    12345678            04/21/2014            04/24/2014
    12345678            04/25/2014            04/24/2014
    12345678            04/25/2014            12/31/9999
    I debug  but i did not see any issue,So there any way that  i can delete that particular  records at PSA level so that loads went successful.I attacdshed the document for better idea.
    Regards
    Raj

    Hi,
    only these record is getting the problem and all records.
    check the one record at RSA3 for testing purpose same record check in BW side.
    if you getting like this not problem you can check the only latest record
    12345678       
    04/25/2014       
    12/31/9999
    put the filter at VALID TO data 12/31/9999 and form date 04/25/2014.
    you want lookup the code just add the one more point.
    WHERE POSITION = RESULT_PACKAGE- 0POSITION
         and DATETO = '99991231'.
    it will pick the only latest record.
    Thanks,
    Phani.

  • VPD date issue between 10.1 and 10.2 databases

    I have uncovered an issue today with VPD against date fields. The issue came up at a client site on a 10.2 database. When I got back to the hotel and tried this on my own database, which is 10.1, I got no issue and everything worked ok.
    Therefore, I am asking if anyone is able to try out the following for me on different Oracle databases and platforms and let me know whether it worked for you or not. I'd like to compile a list of database versions and platforms on which the issue occurs.
    Step 1: create this table as a user
    CREATE TABLE TST_DATE AS (
    SELECT 1 PERSON_UID,
    Trunc(SYSDATE) BIRTH_DATE,
    To_Char(Trunc(SYSDATE), 'DD-MON-YYYY') CHAR_DATE,
    123456 TAX_ID,
    'Smith, Michael B.' FULL_NAME FROM dual);
    Step 2: grant select rights on the table
    GRANT SELECT ON TST_DATE TO PUBLIC;
    Step 3: switch your login to SYS and run this script:
    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION F_CHECK_ITEM_TST(p_object_schema in varchar2, p_object_name varchar2)
    RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
    V_PREDICATE VARCHAR2(2000) := '1 = 2';
    BEGIN
    RETURN(V_PREDICATE);
    END F_CHECK_ITEM_TST;
    Step 4: As SYS, run this to grant access rights over the function
    GRANT EXECUTE ON F_CHECK_ITEM_TST TO PUBLIC;
    Step 5: As SYS, run this to enable the policy
    BEGIN DBMS_RLS.ADD_POLICY(
    OBJECT_SCHEMA => 'DRAKE',
    OBJECT_NAME => 'TST_DATE',
    POLICY_NAME => 'SecByTST',
    FUNCTION_SCHEMA => 'SYS',
    POLICY_FUNCTION => 'F_CHECK_ITEM_TST',
    STATEMENT_TYPES => 'SELECT',
    POLICY_TYPE => DBMS_RLS.DYNAMIC,
    SEC_RELEVANT_COLS => 'BIRTH_DATE',
    SEC_RELEVANT_COLS_OPT => DBMS_RLS.ALL_ROWS);
    END;
    Note: in the above policy change the OBJECT_SCHEMA name to be the name of the user who owns the table you created in Step 1
    Step 6: Go into Discoverer Admin and import the table as a new folder.
    Be sure to uncheck the "Date hierarchies" box and set "Default aggregate on data points" to detail. Grant access to any user.
    Step 7: Using Desktop or Plus, log in as that user then try to query the folder with the date not included, there should be no problem.
    Step 8: Now try to query with the date included
    On my 10.2 database I get ORA-24334: no descriptor for this position. This happens when logged into Discoverer as the table owner, EUL owner or any other user. However, when logged into Discoverer as SYS which is exempt from all VPD policies, there is no error when the date is included.
    We tried this in Discoverer Desktop, Plus and Viewer with the same results in all three. We can successfully query the table from SQL*Plus, SQL Developer and TOAD.
    There also seems to be no issue at all with the 10.1 database so there seems to be an issue between Discoverer and the 10.2 database.
    What do you think?
    P.S. to cancel the policy use this script when logged in as SYS:
    EXEC DBMS_RLS.drop_policy(
    OBJECT_SCHEMA => 'DRAKE',
    OBJECT_NAME => 'TST_DATE',
    POLICY_NAME => 'SecByTST');
    This same information is available on my blog in a more readable format here:
    http://learndiscoverer.blogspot.com/2006/12/vpd-date-issue-between-101-and-102.html

    Hi Rod
    Well don't you just love Oracle. Obviously, whatever tests were done for certifying Discoverer against the 10.2 database did not include checking VPD policies. This merits a blog entry from me.
    Your workaround for V_PREDICATE VARCHAR2(2000) := 'BIRTH_DATE=TO_DATE(''01-JAN-0001'')'; works. However, I had to write a new function to do this because my real function was trapping about a dozen items at the same time, some dates, some numbers and some varchars - exactly the way that the Oracle example code shows it in the 10.2 database manual.
    So what I did was to create a new function that only handles dates and added a dedicated policy that works with only that function. Unfortuately, because I have many dates to manage, I was unabe to hard code the BIRTH_DATE so here is what I did:
    V_PREDICATE VARCHAR2(2000) := 'SYSDATE = TO_DATE(''01-JAN-0001'')';
    This works perfectly and Discoverer stopped complaining. It just has two policies on the same table for different data items. Isn't VPD cool? I'm hooked.
    I really appreciate your time and effort on this. Now, let's see what Oracle support make of the issue because I raised a service request last night. No reply yet I'm afraid.
    Best wishes
    Michael

  • IOS 8.3 data issues

    There is no doubt in my mind that there is a data issue with iOS 8.3 and Verizon.  Since I installed the update a week ago, my phone has gone through over 4.6 gb of data (prior to installing the update, I had used .7 gb for the prior 3 weeks before that).  I have never gone over 2 gb of data on my phone for any period before that for years.  This was verified by downloading the daily data usage from the Verizon website.
    I suspect that this is whenever I leave my home.  I left the house for 10 minutes today and went through approximately 100mb of data (i had reset the cellular data usage before I left the house).  I have access through an exchange server through my work but this is so beyond excessive at this point.  I have already doubled my data usage for this month and increased my plan to minimize overages and i've already maxed that out.  I'm so beyond frustrated at this point and would love to get back to the prior version but i'm weary of bricking my phone that I use for work.  I've tried rebooting several times, reseting from an older backup, etc.

    I had a similar problem over a year ago- blowing through cellular data (even in middle of night).
    The only fix was to backup the phone (iTunes or icloud) and then do a full reset/erase all content and data - basically a factory reset
    Then restore the backup.
    Nothing else worked for me.

  • What is the SAFEST SEQUENCE to convert from a Outlook/iPad/iPhone synced with MobileMe to syncing with iCloud (I have 10 years of calendar diary events and 3000 contacts) - I am worried about the data issues that have been posted about iCloud.

    What is the SAFEST SEQUENCE to convert from a Outlook/iPad/iPhone synced with MobileMe to syncing with iCloud (I have 10 years of calendar diary events and 3000 contacts) - I am worried about the data issues that have been posted about iCloud.
    This has worked fine with MobileMe with only a couple of minor glitches in the past.
    Any experience doing this the "right" way?

    The warranty entitles you to complimentary phone support for the first 90 days of ownership.

  • Oracle 11g - Date Issue?

    Oracle 11g - Date Issue?
    =====================
    I hope this is the right forum for this issue, if not let me, where to go.
    We are using Oracle 11g (11.2.0.1.0) on (Platform : solaris[tm] oe (64-bit)), Sql Developer 3.0.04.
    Our NLS_DATE_FORMAT = 'DD-MON-RR'
    Using 'RR' in the format forces two-digit years less than or equal to 49 to be interpreted as years in the 21st century (2000–2049), and years 50 and over, as years in the 20th century (1950–1999). Setting the RR format as the default for all two-digit year entries allows you to become year-2000 compliant. For example:
    We have a date '01-JUN-31' in our source system. It treat this date as 01-JUN-2031' instead of '01-JUN-1931'. One century forward.
    Do we able to resolve using NLS_DATE_FORMAT change?
    How do we resolve this issue?
    Thanks in helping.

    qwe16235 wrote:
    Our source is Oracle data base, where S_date is defined as DATE. Why did you say STRING , when it defined as DATE data type?I doubt you source is an Oracle database. You may have it stored in an Oracle database, but it cam form somewhere else, and was very likely inserted into the table as a string, wherever it came from. Given a string that resembles a date, Oracle will try to convert it to a date using the nls_date_format parameter for the session (which can either be set in the session or inherited form the database). Perhaps this will help explain:
    SQL> create table t (conv_type varchar2(10), dt date);
    Table created.
    SQL> alter session set nls_date_format = 'dd-mon-rr';
    Session altered.
    SQL> insert into t values ('Implicit', '01-jun-31');
    1 row created.
    SQL> insert into t values ('Explicit', to_date('01-jun-1931', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
    1 row created.
    SQL> commit;
    Commit complete.
    SQL> select conv_type, to_char(dt, 'dd-mon-yyyy') dt
      2  from t;
    CONV_TYPE  DT
    Implicit   01-jun-2031
    Explicit   01-jun-1931So, unless you are really inserting dates, not strings that look like dates, you are going to have problems.
    John

  • 0IC_C03 Inventory Control Data Issue

    Dear Gurus,
    We have implemented BI 7.0 with the latest support package as of 1st May 2011. Issues are coming relavent to 0IC_C03 infocube for inventory control. I have followed the how to guideline but issues are there.
    I have done the following settings:
    1:To fill up the extractor for 2LIS_3_BX i have used the Transaction MCNB (All Stock Including non-valuated).
    2: To fill up the extractor for 2LIS_3_BF i have used the Transaction OLI1BW (Posting Date till 2999).
    3: To fill up the extractor for 2LIS_3_UM i have used the Transaction OLIZBW (Posting Date till 2999).
    4: To generate the IP for 2LIS_3_BX for the opening stock balances the update mode CREATE OPENING BALANCE is not showing so i have used the update mode Generate Initial Status.
    5: After running the IP for 2LIS_3_BX i run the DTP with extraction Mode "Initialize non commulative".
    6: In the infocube Manage for 0IC_C03 i go in the collapse tab and enter the 2LIS_3_BX Request ID and uncheck the "NON Marker Update" to compress the request.
    7: I generate the IP & DTP for both 2LIS_3_BF & Then 2LIS_3_UM and compress both the requests in the cube by the checking the "NON MArker Update"
    8: When i run the query the data is not coming out right. Some records have negative values and some have wrong values.
    Kindly tell me what to do.
    Also, ive seen people using 2LIS_3_BF & UM only but not BX. How will this solution be implemented?
    Regards,
    Shahzad Khero

    Dear Guru,
    As off now here are the issues:
    Quantity Total Stock is matching the stock in ECC 6.0 in transaction MB5B. The issue lies with the Issue Quantity Total Stock
    & Receipt Quantity Total Stock. The values are not showing accurately but the new balance per posting date are showing accurately.
    For e.g. Cube: 0IC_C03
    Calendar Day     Issue Quantity Total Stock           Receipt Quantity Total Stock                          Quantity Total Stock
    03/31/2010                           0.000  MT                                 63.000  MT                                                63.000  MT
    04/1/2010                           78.940  MT                                 91.410  MT                                                75.470  MT
    04/2/2010                           18.000  MT                                 0.000  MT                                                57.470  MT
    MB51
    Posting Date       Issue Quantity Total Stock           Receipt Quantity Total Stock                          Quantity Total Stock
    03/31/2010                           0.000  MT                                 63.000  MT                                                63.000  MT
    04/1/2010                           68.940  MT                                 81.410  MT                                                75.470  MT
    04/2/2010                           18.000  MT                                 0.000  MT                                                57.470  MT
    As you can see the issue & reciept docs are different but the impact on quantity total stock is fine. On top of that the material documents showing in PSA are slightly more than actual showing in MB5B & MB51. Some material documents are showing as a debit entry as well as credit entry in PSA but in reality they have a debit entry or a credit one. Kindly give me a feedback.
    Regards,
    shahzad

Maybe you are looking for