DDIC Entry problem

Dear All,
In customer table I need to enter records, but I am not able to enter more than one record it showing 'A data record with the specified key already exists'. Please suggest me how can I enter the records.
Thanks and regards,
Krish....

Dear Suhas Saha ,
1.Why SAP did not create a maintenance generator for this table ?
Ans: It is not standard table it is customer specific table we have no authorization to change it. while created table they may not create the TMG(Table maintenance generator).
2. Did you check if there are any maintenance views for this table ?
Ans: There is no Views for this table.
3. Is this table maintained through some program ?
Ans: No, purpose of this table is it is communicate with the XI and Webservices.if we give one time entry like web service ip address, user name and password it will pass through one server only but we have another server and another web service we need to enter another server details also.
Dear Nick Young ,
The table name is '/MXXXXXXX' and it is the specific to client only I think it is not there is standard sap tables.
My question is if I create z function group in the same package is it effect to standard functionality. If give the function group as '/sap.../ it won't accept what can I do in this case. Please suggest me.
Thanks and regards,
Krish.....

Similar Messages

07 Depreciation Area Accouting Entry Problem.

Dear All,
I am facing 07 Tax Depreciation Area Journal Entry Problem.It would be of Great help if You Provide your Valuable Suggestion / Comments.
The Net Effect is Correct for the Entry but Presentation is not Right.
I am getting this entry in SAP 07 area for std cost.Assset Cost is 210.
Dr T23056           210
Dr E23057            90
Cr E23057           -300
I want E23057 Account also to be Credited by 210 instead of -300 & again debit to Same Account by 90.
Pls suggest Where I am missing in Configuration.
Thanks & Regards,
Pankaj

Hi,
Check your COD config.
I hope you are having 01,02, 03 and 07 as dep areas in your COD.
First set your COD with OAPL.
Use transactions OADB, and OADC.
in OADB give posting in GL as 1 for dep areas, for which you want to adopt values to GL. For other areas put 0 in posting to GL, and select real dep area for all the areas.
in OADC specify your dep area type for all the dep areas.
Now OABC and OABD.
Put proper settings for each dep area according to SPAIN country regulations.
Thanks,
Srinu

Service entry problem when not accepted

We have a problem when there are multiple service entries agains a PO. There are no problems when we do the first entry and accept. The problem happens when we do a second entry and the end user only saves and forgets to accept the SES. When they do an invoice against this unaccepted SES the system brings in the previous SES number, when this goes unnoticed the vendor gets paid twice for the same thing. Is there a way for SAP to look at the SES field in the invoice and determine that this SES number has already been paid? Thanks in advance.

Hi Eric,
please try the following: check in transaction XK02 the field "Check Flag for Double Invoices or Credit Memos" (LFB1-REPRF).
Indicator which means that incoming invoices and credit memos are checked for double entries at the time of entry.
In checking for duplicate invoices, the system compares the following characteristics by default:
Vendor
Currency
Company code
Gross amount of the invoice
Reference document number
Invoice document date
If all of these characteristics are the same, the system issues a message that you can customize.
The system only checks for duplicate invoices in Materials Management if you enter the reference document number upon entering the invoice.
Of course if the invoice document date is different, there is no message M8108 issued. Please read also the notes 305201 and 308008.
I would recommend you to use the service based invoice verification function (set the field EKPO-LEBRE to X) in the PO item.
Regards,
Edit

GR/IR entry problem

Hi
We have posted one invoice through MIRO in the year 2005. And in the same year payment also happened for that invoice.
But customer has raised a ticket why this invoice is showing as not cleared in FBL1N.
If i see that invoice in MIRO follow up documents area i unable to find since it is saying no finance documents available. If i verify the BSEG table and BSAK table those invoice and clearing documents not there and it is only available in BSIS.
And i tried to clear it manually through F.13 but it is throwing error BSEG entry is missing
So how can i clear the 2005 gr/ir entry which is already cleared from finance side.
is it some archive problem or something else
Waiting for expert guidance to resolve this issue
Regards
Vishnu

Hi Srinivas,
As you told, i kept Creterion 1 alone and i tried F.13
Its working fine in pre production
Is it feasible solution in Production, since we have thousands of user and thousands of clearings
If i modify OB74 setting, it may affect the businees right
And i dont have authorisations to modify the Gl account also (post automatic check box)
So without changing the settings, is there any way
Reg
Vishnu

Accounting entry problem for cancel billing document

Hi,
We have manufacturing process for SO to DC we follow the proces
Sales order -> delivery -> VF01 -> J1IIN -> VF02 release to accounting,
now when we do the above procees in billing document document flow we can see two accounting entry generated ref. to t. code VF01 and billing document number
now to reverse the above, we are following the procedure
J1IIN reverse -> VF02 cancel billing document we get new cancel billing document numbver then again in VF02 we are releasing the cancel document number,
but earlier when we do the cancelation procedure only two accounting entries were generating under the original billing document and also under the cancel billing document, but now as soon as we reverse the invoice in J1IIN under the original billing document one additional accounting entry is coming which is generated ref. to T. code J1IH document type JM , and when we cancel and release the billing document there are three accounting entery under Cancel billing document number and additional entry is created ref. to J1IH do. no. JM
so what can be the problem hiw one entry is generated by J1IH and what is eefect of this.
regards,
zafar

in billing document document flow we can see two accounting entry generated
Yes this is standard. One for customer debit and another accounting document for excise.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

For all entries problem

Hi experts,
I have a below statement in my code
"SELECT on EKPO for all entries on ITAB (which is having 4 hundread thousand recods )"
giving dump saying "MEMORY_PGFREE_FAILED" and "Error releasing memory block in paging"
i need your suggestion to avoid the memory problem
"MEMORY_PGFREE_FAILED" ?
can we go ahead with EXTRACT logic, does this solve the memory problem?
thoughts will be appriciated,
Thanks,
Shaik bhasha

See the example code :
REPORT ZSPFLI LINE-SIZE 132 LINE-COUNT 65(3)
                                             NO STANDARD PAGE HEADING.
TABLES:SPFLI,SCARR, SFLIGHT, SBOOK.
SELECT-OPTIONS: MYCARRID FOR SPFLI-CARRID.
FIELD-GROUPS: HEADER, SPFLI_FG, SFLIGHT_FG, SBOOK_FG.
INSERT:
        SPFLI-CARRID
        SPFLI-CONNID
        SFLIGHT-FLDATE
        SBOOK-BOOKID
       INTO HEADER,
        SPFLI-CARRID
        SPFLI-CONNID
        SPFLI-CITYFROM
        SPFLI-AIRPFROM
        SPFLI-CITYTO
        SPFLI-AIRPTO
        SPFLI-DEPTIME
        SCARR-CARRNAME
      INTO SPFLI_FG,
        SFLIGHT-FLDATE
        SFLIGHT-SEATSMAX
        SFLIGHT-SEATSOCC
        SFLIGHT-PRICE
      INTO SFLIGHT_FG,
        SBOOK-BOOKID
        SBOOK-CUSTOMID
        SBOOK-CUSTTYPE
        SBOOK-SMOKER
       INTO SBOOK_FG.
SELECT * FROM SPFLI WHERE CARRID IN MYCARRID.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM SCARR WHERE CARRID = SPFLI-CARRID.
EXTRACT SPFLI_FG.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT
   WHERE CARRID = SPFLI-CARRID AND CONNID = SPFLI-CONNID.
    EXTRACT SFLIGHT_FG.
    SELECT * FROM SBOOK
           WHERE CARRID = SFLIGHT-CARRID AND
           CONNID = SFLIGHT-CONNID AND FLDATE = SFLIGHT-FLDATE.
      EXTRACT SBOOK_FG.
      CLEAR SBOOK.
    ENDSELECT.
    CLEAR SFLIGHT.
ENDSELECT.
CLEAR SPFLI.
ENDSELECT.
SORT.
LOOP.
AT SPFLI_FG.
    FORMAT COLOR COL_HEADING.
    WRITE: / SCARR-CARRNAME,
             SPFLI-CONNID, SPFLI-CITYFROM,
             SPFLI-AIRPFROM, SPFLI-CITYTO, SPFLI-AIRPTO, SPFLI-DEPTIME.
    FORMAT COLOR OFF.
ENDAT.
AT SFLIGHT_FG.
    WRITE: /15 SFLIGHT-FLDATE, SFLIGHT-PRICE, SFLIGHT-SEATSMAX,
               SFLIGHT-SEATSOCC.
ENDAT.
AT SBOOK_FG.
    WRITE: /30 SBOOK-BOOKID, SBOOK-CUSTOMID,
                 SBOOK-CUSTTYPE, SBOOK-SMOKER.
ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.

IPhone calendar entry problem

Hi all,
I'm hoping somebody can help me with this problem.
I am using iCal on OS X 10.7.2 and iOS 5 on my iPhone. Whenever I syncronise my calendars via iTunes those existing calendar entries which I have changed in iCal show up as new entries in calendar on my iPhone, whilst the existing entries remain. This means that my iPhone is full of irritating duplicates.
Does anybody know what the problem might be here? It seems to lie with my iPhone, I think...

Go to Settings>Mail,Contacts,Calendars and tap Sync (in the Calendars section), then set this to a longer time period.

Named.log entry - problem?

Hi!
I have running a DNS-Server on my MacOSX Server 10.5.7.
Every day I find an entry in my named.log like this:
+11-Jun-2009 04:01:18.352 checkhints: view com.apple.ServerAdmin.DNS.public: L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET/A (199.7.83.42) missing from hints+
+11-Jun-2009 04:01:18.352 checkhints: view com.apple.ServerAdmin.DNS.public: L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET/A (198.32.64.12) extra record in hints+
The DNS-Server seems running fine, means I didn't notice any problems.
Can I ignore this error-msg.?
Or what can I do to solve the problem?
Thank you for your assistance,
Peter.

The named.ca file needs to be updated in you /var/named/ folder.
To read more - go here and get the file at the end of the article.
http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2008/02/icann-flips-switch-on-ipv6-dns-root-s ervers.ars
Mine is now resolved. Thanks

TDS ENTRY Problem

Hello
I have a problem regarding TDS entry
When we Pay TDS on Invoice TDS Calculated on Gross price
JE will Crated as: net Value 1000 & tax VAT@5%= 50 Total Bill value is 1050 & TDS Amount is 105 So Total bill show Rs 945
due & JE crated as
Vendor A/c Credit 945
TDS Payable A/C Credit by 105
VAt A/C debit by 50
Raw Material A/C debit by 1000
I thing this right but my client want entry should be
Vendor A/c Credit 1050
TDS Payable A/C Credit by 105
Vendor A/C Debit by 105
VAt A/C debit by 50
Raw Material A/C debit by 1000
They want vendor ledger should show how much tds cut whey they view vendor ledger..

Hi,
write a query report to show the document and vendor wise TDS Deducted amount.
Regards
Jambulingam.P

Wrong entry problem

Hi gurus,
here i faced this problem,
Material Document created after Goods Receipt: XXXXX578
FI Document created after Goods Receipt: XXXXX190
Created FI Document is:
1 89 XXXXXX Raw materials 12.01 Dr. Material
2 96 XXXXXX GRC 450001175200010 1,201.00- GRIR Credit (GL A/C)
3 86 XXXXXX Price diff. 1,257.08 GRIR Dr.
4 96 XXXXXX Clearing of duties 60.05- GRIR Credit (GL A/C)
5 96 XXXXXX Clearing of duties 8.04- GRIR Credit (GL A/C)
Correct Entry should come instead of above: (according my knowledge, if any mistake is there kindly suggest)
Raw Material Ac Dr 1296.97 (BasicBCDECess)
To
GR/IR clearing Ac Cr 1201.00 (Basic)
Clearing of Duties Cr 95.97 (BCD+ECess)
kindly throu a light for correcting the entry, or where i change the price diff. a/c to material account??
Raghav

Hi,
It looks that you have maintained excise data of material in Excise Rate Maintenance table at J1ID for cenvat credit. Hence the excise duty is not getig loaded on the material as mentioned in your correct entry. Also pl. check excise rate maintained for the chapter id.
Normally price difference account gets hit when the price of material at the time of GR & that at the time of IR is different. Pl. check whether invoice has been posted for the material with different price.
Regards.
Prashant Kolhatkar

Entry problem

my client have done the folowing process
1. created po with del cost of 37000 which is actually 50000
2.done GR for 37000 as del cost
3. done miro invoice for 37000
4.payment of 37000
5. vendor agin sent another bill of 13000
6.user done INVOICE of 13000
7payment of 13000 is done
now the balance in GR IR acct of 13000 appears
now i want to clear that entry how can i proceed
actually user have to pass a subsequent debit entry but he have done invoice by fillig the amount and quantity manually
payment is done we cant reverse it
plz suggest anyoter alternative
regards
KI

hi priyanka,
i am agree with u that user should do the subseq debit
this is a import PO so there is no GR based IV so user able to do the invoice entry
now the problem is that due to this invoice entry system is showing the GR/IR balances
this entry have not been done from FI side using F-43
so plz help me out
regards
KI

Consignment issue Accounting entries problem

Dear Guru's
I have configured the consignment sales for my client but i am facing one problem pl advice
1. Consignment fill up process (delivery of goods)
Create Billing document         Accounting Entry
                   Consignee A/c                       Dr
                   Consignment Sales Contra Cr
but issue in
2. Consignment issue process
Create Billing document         Accounting Entry             as
                      Consignee A/c                       Dr
                     Sales revenue                        Cr
WHERE AS IN THIS CASE I NEED IT SHOULD DEBIT THE Consignment Sales Contra
I need this entries in accounting document
Consignment Sales Contra Dr
Sales revenue                        Cr
Regards
Arun
Edited by: ArunSingh2010 on Jun 20, 2010 11:20 AM

Consignee A/c Dr
Consignment Sales Contra Cr
I feel you have not configured properly for consignment process. As you would be aware in fill up stage, there would be no accounting implications either while posting the goods issue or creating a proforma on customer due to the fact that you would just be moving the goods from delivering plant to another location.
This being the case, I dont know why you want the consignee account to be debited ??
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Kernel Upgrade Message server entry problem

Hallo,
My system
kernel release                700
kernel make variant           700_REL
compiled on                   HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64
patch number                  114
We patched the syste to 221. There are two instances on this system. But the error comes below - system does not comes up.
dev_disp
CCMS: AlInitGlobals : alert/use_sema_lock = TRUE.
**ROR => platform patchno is 114 114 [dpxxdisp.c   18253]
ERROR => but my patchno   is 221 [dpxxdisp.c   18254]
DP_FATAL_ERROR => Release inconsistent with running system
DISPATCHER EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN ***
I have seen note number 409839. I dont understand the solution.
Do I delete the message server entry in RZ03 -> Utilities-> diagnosis-> message server status area pertaining Rel_patch_number ?
Where do I take the message server entry from ?
Please help if you had similar problems and solved them.

I found something in the AI
actually the exe directory is not linked to the kernel. This looks unusual. As exe here should be linked to the /sapmnt/SID/exe
s96pnp20:pcpadm 43> pwd
/usr/sap/PCP/D01
s96pnp20:pcpadm 44> ls -ltr
total 22
drwxr-xr-x   7 pcpadm     sapsys          96 Jun 1 2008 igs
drwxr-xr-x   2 pcpadm     sapsys          96 Jun 1 2008 sec
drwxr-xr-x   2 pcpadm     sapsys          96 Jun 1 2008 log
drwxr-xr-x   5 pcpadm     sapsys        4096 Jul 3 20:38 exe
drwxr-xr-x   4 pcpadm     sapsys        2048 Sep 30 10:00 data
drwxr-xr-x   2 pcpadm     sapsys        5120 Sep 30 10:14 work

Numbers for iPad (iOS 5): formula entry problem

Whenever I attempt to work with a formula-cell in Numbers, the large, on-screen number-pad pops-up, overlapping the text-entry bar. I undersand that the normal opperation is for the num-pad to "push" the text-entry bar upwards, so that the text-entry bar remains visible, above the num-pad. In my case, the num-pad is simply opening above the text-bar.
Of course, this makes it impossible to see the formula as I type. I have tried formatting the cell as "text", and then selecting the "equal sign" button. The result is the same: the num-pad pops-up, overlapping the text-bar.
I am using an Apple Wireless Keyboard, but the problem persists whether I am using the touch-screen or the physical keyboard. Pressing the eject button on the keyboard has no effect: the enourmous keypad remains, obstructing my view of the text-entry field.
How do I hide the number pad?
Can I force the text-entry bar to re-align itself with the num-pad?

I have found that the 'split keyboard', which I've been using lately, was causing this behavior. Switching back to the standard keyboard arrangement has eliminated the problem.

T006A table entries problem

Hi,
We have a problem with table T006A entries.We need to change the data in this standard table. SE16N TCode is not in SRM.How to change the existing entries in the standard tables with transport request.
Regards,
Chandu

Hi,
Use below Procedure
1- GOTO>Tcode SM30>put the Table Name in the Table/View Field
2- Click on Customizing Button
3- Choose "Continue w/o specifying Project"
4- Click on "Check Units of Measurment".
Now You can maintain the UOM.
I think this will solve your problem
Regards,
Sachin

DDIC Entry problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for