DEADLOCK DETECTED == wwv_flow_data

I was hoping (praying) someone could shed further light on why we are experiencing deadlocks in our APEX business applications. We have a number of large organisations using our business suite of apex applications (all LIVE - searches, inserts, updates, deletes) and we are currently struggling to find out what's causing deadlocks that are being generated (these are severely affecting the server performance etc). I know it's difficult to summarise what's causing without a reproducible example but unfortunately we also cannot reproduce it at our developement centre. It is currently only occuring at customer sites on a consistent basis.
Does anyone have any idea how we can go about tracing the cause of these Deadlocks ?
Why are they occurring - there is no specific dml against apex dictionary tables (api's are alwasy used to do things like set session state, clear cache etc)
All we currently have is the generated trace file and some Deadlock examples are below. Why is it always the 'wwv_flow_data' table ?
Also, the majority of them seem to be updating an item to an apex URL (bind vars separated by colons) ie :B6 || ':' || :B5 || ':' || :B4 || ':' || :B3
An example is:
*** 2009-09-29 10:50:24.760
*** ACTION NAME:(PAGE 169) 2009-09-29 10:50:24.759
*** MODULE NAME:(APEX:APPLICATION 147) 2009-09-29 10:50:24.759
*** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$USERS) 2009-09-29 10:50:24.759
*** CLIENT ID:(GHANZANFARJ:2261912940872031) 2009-09-29 10:50:24.759
*** SESSION ID:(4947.3819) 2009-09-29 10:50:24.759
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
information may aid in determining the deadlock:
Deadlock graph:
---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
TX-0089002a-00032b7e 1008 4947 X 710 3585 X
TX-01240010-00023f5f 710 3585 X 1008 4947 X
session 4947: DID 0001-03F0-00000028     session 3585: DID 0001-02C6-00000087
session 3585: DID 0001-02C6-00000087     session 4947: DID 0001-03F0-00000028
Rows waited on:
Session 3585: obj - rowid = 0004AC08 - AABKwIAAaAAAEX1ABZ
(dictionary objn - 306184, file - 26, block - 17909, slot - 89)
Session 4947: obj - rowid = 0004AC08 - AABKwIAAaAAAEX1ABX
(dictionary objn - 306184, file - 26, block - 17909, slot - 87)
Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
Session 3585:
pid=710 serial=6190 audsid=169143612 user: 6970/<none>
O/S info: user: oracle, term: , ospid: 2113768, machine: rbisprodapp
program: httpd@rbisprodapp (TNS V1-V3)
client info: GHANZANFARJ
application name: APEX:APPLICATION 147, hash value=3432819319
action name: PAGE 169, hash value=1337406124
Current SQL Statement:
UPDATE WWV_FLOW_DATA SET ITEM_VALUE = :B6 || ':' || :B5 || ':' || :B4 || ':' || :B3 WHERE FLOW_INSTANCE = :B2 AND ITEM_ID = :B1
End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
Current SQL statement for this session:
DELETE FROM WWV_FLOW_DATA WHERE FLOW_INSTANCE = :B1 AND ITEM_ID IN (SELECT ID FROM WWV_FLOW_PAGE_PLUGS WHERE FLOW_ID = :B3 AND PAGE_ID = :B2 AND PLUG_SOURCE_TYPE IN ( 'SIMPLE_CHART', 'UPDATABLE_SQL_QUERY', 'DBMSSQL_CURSOR', 'FUNCTION_RETURNING_DBMSSQL_CURSOR', 'FUNCTION_RETURNING_SQL_QUERY_CACHED', 'FUNCTION_RETURNING_SQL_QUERY', 'STRUCTURED_QUERY', 'SQL_QUERY', 'DYNAMIC_QUERY'))
----- PL/SQL Call Stack -----
object line object
handle number name
7000003679ac978 227 package body FLOWS_030100.WWV_FLOW_DISP_PAGE_PLUGS
70000050e85efb8 10283 package body FLOWS_030100.WWV_FLOW
7000004340cf8c0 255 procedure FLOWS_030100.F
70000039feafba8 31 anonymous block

This sounds like you are missing some commits in your DML.
Deadlocks normally only occur in Oracle when two sessions try to lock the same rows for update.
Session1: locks row A;
Session2: locks row B;
Session1: tries to lock row B;-- Waiting because of lock by session2
Session2: tries to lock row A; -- Waiting because of lock by session1 / Deadlock
This situation is highly unuasual for an Oracle application and is (almost) always a flaw in application design.
You should try to figure out which DML is being triggered by the two locking sessions. This maybe on an APEX page, but could also be in a database trigger or procedure.
To rule other things out: check which SESSION_ID's are being used by the application at the time of the deadlock. Maybe your users are using some bookmarks that point to the same SESSION_ID...

Similar Messages

  • Fix for ORA-00060: Deadlock detected errors

    Hello APEX community,
    in the last days we are hitting more and more frequent the ORA-00060: Deadlock detected error in one of our applications. Logged an SR with Oracle Support but so far not too much help, except pointing to some older bugs:
    Bug 6618662: APEX APPEARS TO BE CAUSING DEADLOCK - CASE COLLECTION or Bug 7587013: INSERTING AND DELETING WWV_FLOW_DATA CAUSES DEADLOCK, which do not look at all appealing as the first bug was logged in Nov 2007 and the resolution was delayed from version 3.1, to 4.0 and even to 4.1, while de second was logged in Nov 2008 and not much happened with it.
    I am curious how many other users are hitting the same issue and which workarounds found for the problem. For example yesterday I could see 12 such errors in my log, today already 3.
    Florin

    Hi John,
    here it is: http://www.moyersoen.be/auction/1442/ or http://www.moyersoen.be/pls/apex/f?p=2008:11:0::::P11_AUCTION_ID:1442. Normally the page response time is < 0.20, but from time to time it goes up to more than 20 seconds and at those times I can see also the ORA-00060: Deadlock detected errors.
    Looks like the users are clicking twice refresh for that page. I am trying now to build a testcase that reproduce the issue easily.
    Florin

  • ORA-00060: Deadlock detected

    I getting error as "ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/.................". Following are my observations on the occurence of this error.
    The deadlock is encountered first time when trying to login to applications. I have R12 vision instance on linux.
    Following the content of the alert_VIS.log file
    Mon Jun 15 04:41:41 2009
    Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
    LICENSE_MAX_SESSION = 0
    LICENSE_SESSIONS_WARNING = 0
    Picked latch-free SCN scheme 3
    Using LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1 parameter default value as /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/arch
    Autotune of undo retention is turned on.
    IMODE=BR
    ILAT =44
    LICENSE_MAX_USERS = 0
    SYS auditing is disabled
    ksdpec: called for event 13740 prior to event group initialization
    Starting up ORACLE RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.3.0.
    System parameters with non-default values:
    tracefiles_public = TRUE
    processes = 200
    sessions = 400
    timed_statistics = TRUE
    shared_pool_size = 419430400
    shared_pool_reserved_size= 41943040
    nls_language = american
    nls_territory = america
    nls_sort = binary
    nls_date_format = DD-MON-RR
    nls_numeric_characters = .,
    nls_comp = binary
    nls_length_semantics = BYTE
    sga_target = 1073741824
    control_files = /d01/oracle/VIS/db/apps_st/data/cntrl01.dbf, /d01/oracle/VIS/db/apps_st/data/cntrl02.dbf, /d01/oracle/VIS/db/apps_st/data/cntrl03.dbf
    db_block_checksum = TRUE
    db_block_size = 8192
    compatible = 10.2.0
    log_buffer = 14251008
    log_checkpoint_interval = 100000
    log_checkpoint_timeout = 1200
    db_files = 512
    log_checkpoints_to_alert = TRUE
    dml_locks = 10000
    undo_management = AUTO
    undo_tablespace = APPS_UNDOTS1
    db_block_checking = FALSE
    O7_DICTIONARY_ACCESSIBILITY= FALSE
    session_cached_cursors = 500
    utl_file_dir = /usr/tmp, /usr/tmp, /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/appsutil/outbound/VIS_oracleebsr12, /usr/tmp
    plsql_native_library_dir = /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/plsql/nativelib
    plsql_native_library_subdir_count= 149
    plsql_code_type = native
    plsql_optimize_level = 2
    job_queue_processes = 2
    systemtrig_enabled = TRUE
    cursor_sharing = EXACT
    parallel_min_servers = 0
    parallel_max_servers = 8
    background_dump_dest = /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/bdump
    user_dump_dest = /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/udump
    max_dump_file_size = 20480
    core_dump_dest = /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/cdump
    db_name = VIS
    open_cursors = 600
    ifile = /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/VIS_oracleebsr12_ifile.ora
    sortelimination_cost_ratio= 5
    btree_bitmap_plans = FALSE
    fastfull_scan_enabled = FALSE
    sqlexecprogression_cost= 2147483647
    likewith_bind_as_equality= TRUE
    pga_aggregate_target = 1073741824
    workarea_size_policy = AUTO
    optimizer_secure_view_merging= FALSE
    aq_tm_processes = 1
    olap_page_pool_size = 4194304
    Mon Jun 15 04:42:05 2009
    WARNING:Oracle instance running on a system with low open file descriptor
    limit. Tune your system to increase this limit to avoid
    severe performance degradation.
    PSP0 started with pid=3, OS id=6824
    PMON started with pid=2, OS id=6822
    MMAN started with pid=4, OS id=6826
    DBW0 started with pid=5, OS id=6828
    CKPT started with pid=7, OS id=6832
    SMON started with pid=8, OS id=6834
    RECO started with pid=9, OS id=6836
    CJQ0 started with pid=10, OS id=6838
    LGWR started with pid=6, OS id=6830
    MMON started with pid=11, OS id=6840
    MMNL started with pid=12, OS id=6842
    Mon Jun 15 04:42:19 2009
    ALTER DATABASE MOUNT
    Mon Jun 15 04:42:25 2009
    Setting recovery target incarnation to 2
    Mon Jun 15 04:42:27 2009
    Successful mount of redo thread 1, with mount id 243370348
    Mon Jun 15 04:42:27 2009
    Database mounted in Exclusive Mode
    Completed: ALTER DATABASE MOUNT
    Mon Jun 15 04:42:28 2009
    ALTER DATABASE OPEN
    Mon Jun 15 04:42:48 2009
    Thread 1 opened at log sequence 16
    Current log# 3 seq# 16 mem# 0: /d01/oracle/VIS/db/apps_st/data/log3.dbf
    Successful open of redo thread 1
    Mon Jun 15 04:42:48 2009
    MTTR advisory is disabled because FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET is not set
    Mon Jun 15 04:42:48 2009
    SMON: enabling cache recovery
    Mon Jun 15 04:42:48 2009
    Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x10.a779.0], current log tail at RBA [0x10.a779.0]
    Mon Jun 15 04:43:01 2009
    Successfully onlined Undo Tablespace 18.
    Mon Jun 15 04:43:01 2009
    SMON: enabling tx recovery
    Mon Jun 15 04:43:04 2009
    Database Characterset is UTF8
    Mon Jun 15 04:43:18 2009
    replication_dependency_tracking turned off (no async multimaster replication found)
    Mon Jun 15 04:43:44 2009
    Starting background process QMNC
    QMNC started with pid=14, OS id=6884
    Mon Jun 15 04:46:48 2009
    Completed: ALTER DATABASE OPEN
    Mon Jun 15 05:03:23 2009
    Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x10.b1bd.0], current log tail at RBA [0x10.b1f3.0]
    Mon Jun 15 05:23:33 2009
    Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x10.b5b3.0], current log tail at RBA [0x10.b5c2.0]
    Mon Jun 15 05:45:12 2009
    Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x10.b7b0.0], current log tail at RBA [0x10.fbce.0]
    This is upto the point where all DB and application services has been started.
    Once trying to login to applications following content got appended to the log file
    Mon Jun 15 05:53:39 2009
    ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/udump/vis_ora_8149.trc.
    Mon Jun 15 05:53:51 2009
    ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/udump/vis_ora_8149.trc.
    Mon Jun 15 05:54:02 2009
    ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/udump/vis_ora_8149.trc.
    Mon Jun 15 05:54:12 2009
    ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/udump/vis_ora_8149.trc.
    Mon Jun 15 05:54:22 2009
    ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/udump/vis_ora_8149.trc.
    Mon Jun 15 05:54:28 2009
    ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/udump/vis_ora_8149.trc.
    Mon Jun 15 05:54:35 2009
    ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/udump/vis_ora_8149.trc.
    Mon Jun 15 05:54:42 2009
    ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/udump/vis_ora_8149.trc.
    Mon Jun 15 05:59:06 2009
    Process J000 died, see its trace file
    Mon Jun 15 05:59:11 2009
    kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process
    Mon Jun 15 05:59:11 2009
    Errors in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/bdump/vis_cjq0_6838.trc:
    Mon Jun 15 05:59:23 2009
    Process J000 died, see its trace file
    Mon Jun 15 05:59:24 2009
    kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process
    Mon Jun 15 05:59:24 2009
    Errors in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/bdump/vis_cjq0_6838.trc:
    Mon Jun 15 05:59:50 2009
    Process J000 died, see its trace file
    Mon Jun 15 05:59:50 2009
    kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process
    Mon Jun 15 05:59:50 2009
    Errors in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/bdump/vis_cjq0_6838.trc:
    I did the TKPROF on .trc files but the tkprof file does not show any details as such except similar to :- (don't know if I am missing anything while issuing TKPROF as $ tkprof filename.trc
    filename.txt explain=apps/apps)
    TKPROF: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Mon Jun 15 06:07:14 2009
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
    Trace file: /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/bdump/vis_cjq0_6838.trc
    Sort options: default
    count = number of times OCI procedure was executed
    cpu = cpu time in seconds executing
    elapsed = elapsed time in seconds executing
    disk = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
    query = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
    current = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
    rows = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
    0 statements EXPLAINed in this session.
    Trace file: /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/bdump/vis_cjq0_6838.trc
    Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
    Sort options: default
    1 session in tracefile.
    0 user SQL statements in trace file.
    0 internal SQL statements in trace file.
    0 SQL statements in trace file.
    0 unique SQL statements in trace file.
    22 lines in trace file.
    0 elapsed seconds in trace file.
    Yesterday, I did login to applications after multiple attempts and tried submitting a concurrent request of a standard report (after resolving the data block corrupt issue) and got the same ORA-00060 Error.
    I have a fresh VISION R12 (12.0.4) installed without any customizations. My installation looks to be quite unstable, takes 2-3 attempts for successful login to apps.
    Can you please give any clues on this and how to overcome the problem?
    Thanks,
    Amit

    I have run cmclean.sql as per :- Re: R12 Vision install - Unable to submit concurrent request
    This is the only change made. No new patches etc. Before running cmclean.sql I believe the instance was working fine.
    Now everytime I start the application services, its causing ORA=00060: Deadlock error. There are no issues with just DB services up and running.
    And after apps services up, when trying to Login to apps it just hangs, get error as follows:
    Tue Jun 23 02:04:55 2009
    Process J001 died, see its trace file
    Tue Jun 23 02:04:55 2009
    kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process
    Tue Jun 23 02:04:55 2009
    Errors in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/bdump/vis_cjq0_6747.trc:
    Tue Jun 23 02:05:04 2009
    Process q002 died, see its trace file
    Tue Jun 23 02:05:04 2009
    ksvcreate: Process(q002) creation failed
    Tue Jun 23 02:05:55 2009
    Process J000 died, see its trace file
    Tue Jun 23 02:05:55 2009
    kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process
    Tue Jun 23 02:05:55 2009
    Errors in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/bdump/vis_cjq0_6747.trc:
    Tue Jun 23 02:06:11 2009
    Process J000 died, see its trace file
    Tue Jun 23 02:06:11 2009
    kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process
    Tue Jun 23 02:06:11 2009
    Errors in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/bdump/vis_cjq0_6747.trc:
    Tue Jun 23 02:08:51 2009
    Process J000 died, see its trace file
    Tue Jun 23 02:08:52 2009
    kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process
    Tue Jun 23 02:08:52 2009
    Errors in file /d01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/10.2.0/admin/VIS_oracleebsr12/bdump/vis_cjq0_6747.trc:
    The OS also hangs (Linux) and I have to exit abnormally everytime which is frustrating.
    I am not sure the reason for the same. I have gone through the metalink notes pointed which says to install the health check engine.
    Do you have any clues based on above information as to what might be causing this problem.
    I have 4 GB RAM installed on my Windows and 2 GB has been allocated to Linux on VMware.
    Please let me know if I need to upgrade the memory.
    Any pointers would be really helpful.
    Thanks,
    Amit

  • JDAPI Error: ORA-04020: deadlock detected while trying to lock object

    I have written a JDAPI program to perform read-only impact analysis and report any problems.
    The following error is occurring:
    "A deadlock among DDL and parse locks is detected.
    This deadlock is usually due to user errors in the design of an application or from issuing a set of concurrent statements which can cause a deadlock.
    ORA-04020: deadlock detected while trying to lock object /NSPC6/CHECK_FOR_FORM_CHANGE"
    The error refers to a procedure in a PL/SQL library.
    In one case the error occurred after my final "end of processing" message, which is followed only by a call to "Jdapi.shutdown()".
    Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Neville Sweet.

    I have written a JDAPI program to perform read-only impact analysis and report any problems.
    The following error is occurring:
    "A deadlock among DDL and parse locks is detected.
    This deadlock is usually due to user errors in the design of an application or from issuing a set of concurrent statements which can cause a deadlock.
    ORA-04020: deadlock detected while trying to lock object /NSPC6/CHECK_FOR_FORM_CHANGE"
    The error refers to a procedure in a PL/SQL library.
    In one case the error occurred after my final "end of processing" message, which is followed only by a call to "Jdapi.shutdown()".
    Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Neville Sweet.

  • Database error"ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource"

    Hi All,
    I got dump as
    Database error text........: "ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for
      resource"
    Internal call code.........: "[RSQL/RDUP/NRIV ]"
    Please check the entries in the system log (Transaction SM21).
    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB', was not caught
    in
    procedure "READ_NRIV" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
    Can u ppl tell me how to get correct this?
    Edited by: Bala Chandar on Jul 20, 2009 11:01 AM

    Hi Bala,
    Same type of dump we got when we trigger the DTP which in process chain to load data from DSO to Info cube. And the load had processed with 225 data package and at 164th data package we got this error and except 164th data package all data package processed successfully
    And the request was red. So we had done processed manually by clicking the icon. So all its been green and successfully loaded.
    So when you do process manual the particular data package which got failed will be process successfully  

  • ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource CLOSE cursor

    Hi,
    I am a new member of this forum. I am working with a problem we got a few weeks ago. It is from a Pro C batch executable running on 10 threads dealing with >800 data accessed from multiple tables. The error as reported came from a package.function call.
    This is the error I encountered:
    process_item~G****, D***~-60~ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource~PACKAGE ERROR = CLOSE cursor C_***** in package R***.I*** 7641
    The cursor is a simple SELECT cursor without Table or Record locking.
    My questions are:
    *Upon the occurrence of this error, is the execution already at the CLOSE cursor line or did the error occurred between the OPEN cursor and the CLOSE cursor? There are several lines of code in between OPEN and CLOSE:
    - one that calls for a package.function that simply stores parameter values to a variable
    - another one which fetches the cursor. The group that holds the cursor values is only used by a single function in the package
    *Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor to cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
    *From what I know, Oracle deals with deadlocks by aborting the deadlocking process while others continue, but this deadlock caused our program to hang. How is this possible? Could the root cause of the deadlock be from our threading program? This is a rare occurrence and happened only twice this year.
    Thanks,
    Raf

    Raf Serrano wrote:
    Hi,
    I am a new member of this forum. I am working with a problem we got a few weeks ago. It is from a Pro C batch executable running on 10 threads dealing with >800 data accessed from multiple tables. The error as reported came from a package.function call.
    This is the error I encountered:
    process_item~G****, D***~-60~ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource~PACKAGE ERROR = CLOSE cursor C_***** in package R***.I*** 7641
    The cursor is a simple SELECT cursor without Table or Record locking.
    My questions are:
    *Upon the occurrence of this error, is the execution already at the CLOSE cursor line or did the error occurred between the OPEN cursor and the CLOSE cursor? There are several lines of code in between OPEN and CLOSE:
    - one that calls for a package.function that simply stores parameter values to a variable
    - another one which fetches the cursor. The group that holds the cursor values is only used by a single function in the package
    *Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor to cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
    *From what I know, Oracle deals with deadlocks by aborting the deadlocking process while others continue, but this deadlock caused our program to hang. How is this possible? Could the root cause of the deadlock be from our threading program? This is a rare occurrence and happened only twice this year.
    Thanks,
    RafSELECT (without FOR UPDATE) statements are never involved in ORA-00060.
    only DML statements throw ORA-00060 error

  • ORA-00060: deadlock detected while adding a datafile

    Hello all,
    I found a strange error today.
    We were trying add datafile to our existing tablespace as usually but suddenly caught in a problem.
    SQL> alter tablespace erp_dat2 add datafile '/hotdata2/irsdata/erp_dat2irs_145.dbf' size 2000M;
    alter tablespace erp_dat2 add datafile '/hotdata2/irsdata/erp_dat2irs_145.dbf' size 2000M
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resourcelooks very strange.Searched on google but not found something useful.Still searching.No trace file is generated as such.
    Any ideas will be appreciated. Is it related to any batch job running?
    OS : SunOS 5.10 Generic_142900-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire (64-bit)
    RDBMS : 11.1.0.7
    Regards!
    Edited by: Nitin Joshi on Sep 30, 2010 3:41 PM
    Changed subject line

    seems like you're hitting a bug in 11.1.0.7
    Bug 8332021 - Cannot add a datafiles when sessions reporting ORA-1653 [ID 8332021.8]
    ORA-60 can occur during datafile addition when concurrent sessions
    are reporting ORA-1653 .>>Workaround:
    >> Stop the sessions getting the errors then add the datafile.

  • Getting deadlock detected while waiting for resource error for select Query.....

    Hi all,
    i am getting a below error whenever executing the below select query....
    some times it will show dead lock detected while waiting for resource and terminated...
    some times it executes and gives result..
    but all the time it writes an alert to alert log
    Plesae suggest how to resolve the issue..........
    Thanks in advance
    Env: Linux / Oracle 11.2.0.3.3
    Error from alert log:
    Errors in file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
    ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
    ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
    Trace file info... bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
    Trace file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    ORACLE_HOME = /u01/oracle/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1
    System name:    Linux
    Node name:      bdrdb.cteplindia.com
    Release:        2.6.18-308.el5PAE
    Version:        #1 SMP Fri Jan 27 17:40:09 EST 2012
    Machine:        i686
    Instance name: bdrdb
    Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
    Oracle process number: 92
    Unix process pid: 6076, image: [email protected] (P017)
    *** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** SESSION ID:(423.59970) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** CLIENT ID:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** SERVICE NAME:(bdrdb) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** MODULE NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** ACTION NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
    [Transaction Deadlock]
    Deadlock graph:
                           ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
    Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
    PS-00000001-00000011        92     423     S             33     128     S     X
    BF-2ed08c01-00000000        33     128     S             92     423     S     X
    session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126     session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
    session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23     session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
    DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
    [Transaction Deadlock]
    Deadlock graph:
                           ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
    Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
    PS-00000001-00000011        92     423     S             33     128     S     X
    BF-2ed08c01-00000000        33     128     S             92     423     S     X
    session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126     session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
    session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23     session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
    Rows waited on:
      Session 423: no row
      Session 128: obj - rowid = 00021DC1 - AAAh3BAAVAAAQL/AAA
      (dictionary objn - 138689, file - 21, block - 66303, slot - 0)
    ----- Information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
    Session 128:
      sid: 128 ser: 46176 audsid: 1836857 user: 102/DBLOCAL
        flags: (0x8000041) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
        flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
      pid: 33 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 31611
        image: [email protected]
      client details:
        O/S info: user: masked, term: masked, ospid: 5924:568
        machine: masked program: Toad.exe
        application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
      current SQL:
        application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
      current SQL:
      SELECT  DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
      FROM B_FP_TEST,
           B_USER_INFO,
           J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
           L_TEST_STATUS,
           L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
           j_op_test_anml
    WHERE     B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
           AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_00"
           AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (:"SYS_B_01", :"SYS_B_02", :"SYS_B_03")
           AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_04"
           AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = :"SYS_B_05"
           AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN (:"SYS_B_06", :"SYS_B_07", :"SYS_B_08")
           AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
    ----- End of information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
    *** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.916
    dbkedDefDump(): Starting a non-incident diagnostic dump (flags=0x0, level=3, mask=0x0)
    ----- Error Stack Dump -----
    ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
    ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
    ----- SQL Statement (None) -----
    Current SQL information unavailable - no cursor.
    ----- Call Stack Trace -----
    calling              call     entry                argument values in hex
    location             type     point                (? means dubious value)
    More......
    Query:
    SELECT DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
      FROM B_FP_TEST,
           B_USER_INFO,
           J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
           L_TEST_STATUS,
           L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
           j_op_test_anml
    WHERE     B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
           AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = 0
           AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (1, 2, 99)
           AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
           AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = 1
           AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN ('Scheduled', 'In-Progress', 'Completed')
           AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
           AND (   (j_op_test_anml.end_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
                                                AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
                OR (j_op_test_anml.start_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
                                                  AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
                OR (TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
                                                AND j_op_test_anml.end_date)
                OR (TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
                                                AND j_op_test_anml.end_date))
           AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
           AND B_FP_TEST.DATASOURCE_ID = 9
    Query Exp plan:
    Plan hash value: 3398228788
    | Id  | Operation                                          | Name                | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                                   |                     |  1501 |   102K|  1929   (1)| 00:00:24 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |   1 |  HASH UNIQUE                                       |                     |  1501 |   102K|  1929   (1)| 00:00:24 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |   2 |   CONCATENATION                                    |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |   3 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |   4 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ30005            |   241 | 16870 |   800   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,05 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |*  5 |      HASH JOIN                                     |                     |   241 | 16870 |   800   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
    |   6 |       PX RECEIVE                                   |                     |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
    |   7 |        PX SEND HASH                                | :TQ30004            |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,04 | P->P | HASH       |
    |*  8 |         HASH JOIN                                  |                     |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
    |   9 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
    |  10 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ30003            |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,03 | P->P | HASH       |
    |* 11 |            HASH JOIN                               |                     |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  12 |             BUFFER SORT                            |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q3,03 | PCWC |            |
    |  13 |              PX RECEIVE                            |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  14 |               PX SEND BROADCAST                    | :TQ30000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST  |
    |  15 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  16 |                 NESTED LOOPS                       |                     |   485 | 20855 |   781   (0)| 00:00:10 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  17 |                  TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| J_OP_TEST_ANML      |   485 | 10185 |   296   (0)| 00:00:04 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
    |* 18 |                   INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | IDX$$_2D190001      |   485 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 19 |                  INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                 | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 20 |                 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
    |  21 |             PX BLOCK ITERATOR                      |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q3,03 | PCWC |            |
    |* 22 |              TABLE ACCESS FULL                     | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  23 |          BUFFER SORT                               |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q3,04 | PCWC |            |
    |  24 |           PX RECEIVE                               |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
    |  25 |            PX SEND HASH                            | :TQ30001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
    |* 26 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  27 |       BUFFER SORT                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q3,05 | PCWC |            |
    |  28 |        PX RECEIVE                                  |                     |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
    |  29 |         PX SEND HASH                               | :TQ30002            |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
    |* 30 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL                         | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  31 |    NESTED LOOPS                                    |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  32 |     NESTED LOOPS                                   |                     |     3 |   210 |   329   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  33 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |     3 |   195 |   329   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 34 |       HASH JOIN                                    |                     |     2 |   114 |   325   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  35 |        NESTED LOOPS                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  36 |         NESTED LOOPS                               |                     |     6 |   258 |   322   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  37 |          PARTITION RANGE SINGLE                    |                     |     6 |   126 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 38 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL                        | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |     6 |   126 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 39 |          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                         | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 40 |         TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID         | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
    |* 41 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL                           | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 42 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   |     1 |     8 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 43 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN                            | FI_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 44 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                             | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 45 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                    | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  46 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  47 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ20003            |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q2,03 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |  48 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  49 |       NESTED LOOPS                                 |                     |    33 |  2310 |   399   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |* 50 |        HASH JOIN                                   |                     |    33 |  2145 |   397   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  51 |         PX RECEIVE                                 |                     |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  52 |          PX SEND HASH                              | :TQ20002            |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q2,02 | P->P | HASH       |
    |* 53 |           HASH JOIN                                |                     |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  54 |            BUFFER SORT                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q2,02 | PCWC |            |
    |  55 |             PX RECEIVE                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  56 |              PX SEND BROADCAST                     | :TQ20000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST  |
    |  57 |               NESTED LOOPS                         |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  58 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |    66 |  2838 |   382   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  59 |                 PARTITION RANGE SINGLE             |                     |    66 |  1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 60 |                  TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |    66 |  1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 61 |                 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 62 |                TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID  | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
    |  63 |            PX BLOCK ITERATOR                       |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q2,02 | PCWC |            |
    |* 64 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  65 |         BUFFER SORT                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWC |            |
    |  66 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  67 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ20001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
    |* 68 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL                       | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 69 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                           | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |* 70 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  71 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  72 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ10003            |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q1,03 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |  73 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  74 |       NESTED LOOPS                                 |                     |    33 |  2310 |   399   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |* 75 |        HASH JOIN                                   |                     |    34 |  2210 |   397   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  76 |         PX RECEIVE                                 |                     |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  77 |          PX SEND HASH                              | :TQ10002            |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q1,02 | P->P | HASH       |
    |* 78 |           HASH JOIN                                |                     |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  79 |            BUFFER SORT                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q1,02 | PCWC |            |
    |  80 |             PX RECEIVE                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  81 |              PX SEND BROADCAST                     | :TQ10000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST  |
    |  82 |               NESTED LOOPS                         |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  83 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |    66 |  2838 |   382   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  84 |                 PARTITION RANGE SINGLE             |                     |    66 |  1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 85 |                  TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |    66 |  1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 86 |                 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 87 |                TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID  | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
    |  88 |            PX BLOCK ITERATOR                       |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q1,02 | PCWC |            |
    |* 89 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  90 |         BUFFER SORT                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWC |            |
    |  91 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  92 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ10001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
    |* 93 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL                       | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 94 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                           | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |* 95 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       5 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
       8 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
      11 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
      18 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
      19 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
      20 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
                  "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
      22 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
      26 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
      30 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
      34 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
      38 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
                  LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
      39 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
      40 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
                  "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
      41 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
      42 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
      43 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
      44 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
      45 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
      50 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
      53 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
      60 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
                  LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
      61 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
      62 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
                  "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
      64 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
      68 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
      69 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
      70 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
      75 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
      78 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
      85 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
                  LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND
                  (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
      86 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
      87 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
                  "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
      89 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
      93 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
      94 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
      95 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)

    Excellent piece of follow-up on my first suggestion.
    I nearly made a comment about how the plan doesn't show Bloom filter pruning either - and then I realised why not. The plan you've shown us comes from Explain Plan with literal values present; the trace file shows bind variables with names that are generated when cursor_sharing is set to force or similar - so the run-time plan and the plan from explain plan are almost guaranteed to be different.
    Oracle support will need you to supply the plan you get from trying to run the query and then making a call to dbms_xplan.display_cursor() - dbms_xplan in 10g | Oracle Scratchpad If you do this I think you'll find that the pstart/pstop columns contain entries like :BF0000, and you may even find operations link PX JOIN FILTER CREATE / PX JOIN FILTER USE
    A couple of generic notes:
    if a query does sufficient work to merit parallel execution, then it's usually better to supply the best possible information to the optimizer, which means using literals rather than bind variables - you could try executing the query with the hint /*+ cursor_sharing_exact */ to stop Oracle from turning your literals into binds; it might be the presence of bind variables that's making the optimizer choose a path that has to include bloom filter pruning in your case.
    Where you have the to_date() call you've used a four-digit year - which is a very good thing and helps the optimizer - but it's also a good idea to include an explicit format string as well: with a four-digit year this probably won't make any difference, but it avoids any risk of ambiguity for the optimizer.
    I made a comment about the P->S stage and bottlenecks - I spent a couple more minutes looking at the plan, and I see the optimizer has used concatentation: in effect it has run three query blocks one after the other and fed the results to the query co-ordinator - in this case the P->S would make no difference to the end-user response time there's always a final P->S to the coordinator, you just happen to have three of them.
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis

  • Deadlock detected...without any info after"Information on the OTHER waiting

    i got ORA-00060: Deadlock detected.
    My trace file is as the follow:
    Current SQL statement for this session:
    UPDATE APPLSYS.FND_FORMULA_PARAMETERS SET PARAM_NAME_FRPAR = :B5 , DESC_PARAM_FRPAR = :B4 , TYPE_FRPAR = :B3 , INOUT_FRPAR = :B2 WHERE FRML_FRML_ID = :B1 The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
    deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
    or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
    information may aid in determining the deadlock:
    Deadlock graph:
    ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
    Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
    TX-00050018-00002c3f 28 501 X 28 501 X
    session 501: DID 0001-001C-00000459     session 501: DID 0001-001C-00000459
    Rows waited on:
    Session 501: obj - rowid = 0000CAD7 - AAAMrXAAFAAAGIQAAE
    (dictionary objn - 51927, file - 5, block - 25104, slot - 4)
    Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
    End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
    As you see there isn't any info after *"Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:"*
    what is the cause of this deadlock?

    user13344656 wrote:
    i got ORA-00060: Deadlock detected.
    My trace file is as the follow:
    Current SQL statement for this session:
    UPDATE APPLSYS.FND_FORMULA_PARAMETERS SET PARAM_NAME_FRPAR = :B5 , DESC_PARAM_FRPAR = :B4 , TYPE_FRPAR = :B3 , INOUT_FRPAR = :B2 WHERE FRML_FRML_ID = :B1 The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
    deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
    or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
    information may aid in determining the deadlock:
    Deadlock graph:
    ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
    Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
    TX-00050018-00002c3f        28     501     X             28     501           X
    session 501: DID 0001-001C-00000459     session 501: DID 0001-001C-00000459
    Rows waited on:
    Session 501: obj - rowid = 0000CAD7 - AAAMrXAAFAAAGIQAAE
    (dictionary objn - 51927, file - 5, block - 25104, slot - 4)
    *Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:*
    *End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.*-----------------------------------------------------------------
    As you see there isn't any info after *"Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:"*
    what is the cause of this deadlock?I believe that what you are seeing is termed a self deadlock. Such a deadlock could be caused by an autonomous transaction.
    Take a look at the following Asktom thread:
    http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:1528515465282
    In the above thread, search for: August 24, 2004 - 9am Central time zone
    Read down to at least the comment that was posted on: September 21, 2004 - 2pm Central time zone
    Charles Hooper
    http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/
    IT Manager/Oracle DBA
    K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

  • Deadlock detected  as ORA-00060

    hi,
    deadlock detected in DEV box with below warnings :
    BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 38869, time: 2008-05-12 00.31.38, message:
    ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /oracle/DV1/saptrace/usertrace/dv1_ora_1187980.trc .
    BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2008-05-12 06.20.37
    I checked at OS level also. I found following message :
    DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
    The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
    deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
    or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
    information may aid in determining the deadlock:
    Deadlock graph:
    Blocker(s)-- -Waiter(s)--
    Resource Name
    process session holds waits process session holds waits
    TX-0012000c-00003699
    21
    37
    X
    19
    25
    X
    TX-0007001c-000035f9
    19
    25
    X
    21
    37
    X
    session 37: DID 0001-0015-0000000A
    session 25: DID 0001-0013-00000016
    session 25: DID 0001-0013-00000016
    session 37: DID 0001-0015-0000000A
    Rows waited on:
    Session 25: obj - rowid = 0000489B - AAAEibAAfAAAAUTAAE
    (dictionary objn - 18587, file - 31, block - 1299, slot - 4)
    Session 37: obj - rowid = 0000489B - AAAEibAAfAAAAUPAAa
    (dictionary objn - 18587, file - 31, block - 1295, slot - 26)
    Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
    can anybody help me out for exact solution..
    regards
    Anju

    Hi,
    When you are facing this problem you have to identify the process which is causing the deadlock. You can run DB01 transaction to see the lock waits and deadlocks occured in Database level. So find the PID which is causing the deadlocks, analyze the process what it is doing and its importance by contacting the user who is running the process and then terminate it to resolve the deadlock.
    Regards,
    N.Amarnath

  • DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )

    Hi,
    We are getting deadlocks when the System (Exteranl-Portal-
    Production) Cache Upload process runs. It's Looks like
    application problem.
    We have been getting this deadlock problem whenever the CACHE job gets
    executed.
    Basically its a portal SRM Business package system.
    We have scheduled the CACHE job on portal at 1 AM MSTAZ time , so it
    will use Jco to connect R3 and SRM system to bring the data.
    We have been observing this deadlock problem only at the time of cache
    job.
    But cache job is executing succesfully , but we could see the deadlock
    in the logs.
    In the beginning of trace file (Location:-
    /oracle/RPE/saptrace/usertrace/) we found the information as follows
    more rpe_ora_1835342.trc
    Dump file /oracle/RPE/saptrace/usertrace/rpe_ora_1835342.trc
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
    ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/RPE/102_64
    System name:    AIX
    Node name:      fsp55a08
    Release:        3
    Version:        5
    Machine:        000788ABD600
    Instance name: RPE
    Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
    Oracle process number: 17
    Unix process pid: 1835342, image: oracle@fsp55a08
    2009-05-31 01:00:49.485
    ACTION NAME:() 2009-05-31 01:00:49.485
    MODULE NAME:(JDBC Thin Client) 2009-05-31 01:00:49.485
    SERVICE NAME:(SYS$USERS) 2009-05-31 01:00:49.485
    SESSION ID:(275.1229) 2009-05-31 01:00:49.485
    DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
    [Transaction Deadlock]
    The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
    deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
    or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
    information may aid in determining the deadlock:
    Deadlock graph:
    Blocker(s)--  -Waiter(s)--
    Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
    TX-00050010-00003981        17     275     X             18     284           X
    TX-00010000-000038a3        18     284     X             17     275           X
    session 275: DID 0001-0011-00000139     session 284: DID 0001-0012-0000004F
    session 284: DID 0001-0012-0000004F     session 275: DID 0001-0011-00000139
    Rows waited on:
    Session 284: obj - rowid = 0000561D - AAAFYdAAJAAAHUlAAU
      (dictionary objn - 22045, file - 9, block - 29989, slot - 20)
    Session 275: obj - rowid = 00005617 - AAAFYXAAJAAAG1aAAc
      (dictionary objn - 22039, file - 9, block - 27994, slot - 28)
    Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
    Session 284:
      pid=18 serial=1236 audsid=672749 user: 21/SAPRPEDB
      O/S info: user: rpeadm, term: unknown, ospid: 1234, machine: fsp65003
                program: JDBC Thin Client
    Please help me on this issue.
    Please let me know if you need any more information on the same.
    Thank you in advance.
    Regards,
    A.Naresh
    SAP-BASIS

    Hi,
    Check SAP Note 84348 - Oracle deadlocks, ORA-00060
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • Deadlock detected ora-00060 WWV_FLOW_PREFERENCES$

    Hi,
    Since the last 3 days, my production database running only APEX applications has been having some lagging issues.
    I checked the CPU, Memory etc and everything seems fine except that I get some contention on FLOWS objects.
    I checked the alert.log and I can see deadlocks on WWV_FLOW_PREFERENCES$.
    I was wondering what could cause this ? :
    *** CLIENT ID:(nobody:1682016905757562) 2009-01-16 14:34:46.343
    *** SESSION ID:(255.13691) 2009-01-16 14:34:46.342
    DEADLOCK DETECTED
    [Transaction Deadlock]
    Current SQL statement for this session:
    DELETE FROM WWV_FLOW_PREFERENCES$ WHERE SECURITY_GROUP_ID = :B2 AND PREFERENCE_NAME LIKE 'FSP%' AND USER_ID = :B1
    at the same time I had Row Lock Contention on : UPDATE WWV_FLOW_PREFERENCES$ SET ATTRIBUTE_VALUE = :B5 WHERE USER_ID = NVL(:B4 ,NVL(:B3 ,USER)) AND PREFERENCE_NAME = :B2 AND SECURITY_GROUP_ID = :B1
    Any ideas ?
    Thanks
    Francis.

    Hi ,
    I think I found what was causing locks and deadlocks.
    we added rewrites to Apache to access some pages directly. Multiple rewrites were pointing to the exact same page.
    For example :
    RewriteRule ^/car$ /pls/htmldb/f?p=199:90::RESET:::P90_ID_CAR:99 [R,L]
    RewriteRule ^/cars$ /pls/htmldb/f?p=199:90::RESET:::P90_ID_CAR:99 [R,L]
    RewriteRule ^/car/$ /pls/htmldb/f?p=199:90::RESET:::P90_ID_CAR:99:2 [R,L]
    RewriteRule ^/cars/$ /pls/htmldb/f?p=199:90::RESET:::P90_ID_CAR:99:2 [R,L]
    So what happened , is that when a BOT from MSN or Yahoo was scanning our site, it accessed this page with nobody and the same session # at the same time.
    I suppose that using same session # and same app_user causes lock problems in wwv_flow since it is the updating and selecting the same records.
    So I changed the rewrite rules to use session 0 and removed the RESET in the url (used to reset collections).
    I'll see if this will stop the deadlocks.
    You can reproduce the locks on wwv_flow if you hit the refresh button on your browser multiple times. You will see in the session monitor that the same session # is used by multiple oracle processes.
    maybe there should be a fix to avoid having the same session and same user (nobody) running on separate session simultaneously ?
    Francis.

  • Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waitin

    Hi,
    I'm getting following exception:
    Caused by: net.sf.hibernate.exception.GenericJDBCException: could not update: [com.sample.database.hibernate.mappings.reference.impl.TaskImpl#156979998]
         at net.sf.hibernate.exception.ErrorCodeConverter.handledNonSpecificException(ErrorCodeConverter.java:90)
         at net.sf.hibernate.exception.ErrorCodeConverter.convert(ErrorCodeConverter.java:79)
         at net.sf.hibernate.exception.JDBCExceptionHelper.convert(JDBCExceptionHelper.java:30)
         at net.sf.hibernate.persister.AbstractEntityPersister.convert(AbstractEntityPersister.java:1332)
         at net.sf.hibernate.persister.EntityPersister.update(EntityPersister.java:683)
         at net.sf.hibernate.persister.EntityPersister.update(EntityPersister.java:623)
         at net.sf.hibernate.impl.ScheduledUpdate.execute(ScheduledUpdate.java:52)
         at net.sf.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.executeAll(SessionImpl.java:2438)
         at net.sf.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.execute(SessionImpl.java:2392)
         at net.sf.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.flush(SessionImpl.java:2260)
         at net.sf.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction.commit(JDBCTransaction.java:61)
         at com.sample.database.hibernate.util.HibernateUtil.doSessionWork(HibernateUtil.java:83)
         ... 8 more
    Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:158)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:305)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:272)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.receive(T4C8Oall.java:623)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:181)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.execute_for_rows(T4CPreparedStatement.java:685)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1138)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeInternal(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3018)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeUpdate(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3090)
         at com.mchange.v2.sql.filter.FilterPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(FilterPreparedStatement.java:71)
         at net.sf.hibernate.persister.EntityPersister.update(EntityPersister.java:666)
         ... 15 more
    what could be the reason??
    thanks.

    The error is coming from an application. Please check the alert log file of the database and further there will be a trace file mentioned in the alert log file in which you will have information of the object which is causing deadlock.
    Regards

  • How to resolve ORA-00060: deadlock detected in Workflow

    Hi there,
    I have defined a custom workflow which initiated from Trigger
    AFTER UPDATE of status_code ON pa.pa_proj_elements
    The WF activities includes:
    -Set item attributes
    -Find users and add users to adhoc role
    -Send Action & FYI notification
    -Update status_code using standard API PA_PROGRESS_PUB.UPDATE_PROGRESS, this API will add a new role in pa_percent_completes table.
    But the API failed to update the status_code with the following error:
    ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource in Package PA_PROGRESS_PUB Procedure UPDATE_PROGRESS...
    Please help.

    sorry, typo mistake on the standard API will in fact create a row in pa_percent_completes table.

  • Java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00060: deadlock detected

    We are getting this error "java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource"
    Application tester is receiving this error what is problem/solution?

    Metalink Note:146580.1

Maybe you are looking for

  • Need to focus a particular field in OAF screen

    Hi, I have created a simple search page. Now based on the search criteria entered records will be displayed in tabular format. In Each row there are only two fields updatable. The screen has one 'SUBMIT' and one 'SAVE' button. Now while clicking on t

  • LinkedList implementation

    HGI Can any Body please answer this query:its urgent please do reply as soon as possible.... Create an interface to define Linked List classes. It should be called LinkedListInt and should define all the methods necessary to create a linked list of O

  • Version 1.2.0.2998 Format SQL (Ctrl-B) bug

    When I invoke this feature on any of my packages, part-way through it stops un-indenting the "END;" statements at the end of functions in the package body, so each subsequent function is indented one level more than the one before. It seems to handle

  • Getting the most out for a user that is not exactly savvy

    My apologies if I have broached this topic somewhat before. I bought my first computer last fall and was not that familiar with Windows based machines at the time. Currently, I just surf the internet and check my email in yahoo. I'd like to get more

  • Slow Boot to BootCamp Win7

    When powering on or resuming from sleep (after closing and opening the lid), my MacBook Pro shows an all-grey screen for 20 seconds before going into Windows 7 (which then loads/resumes fast). In this case I'm using an SSD with only Win7 on it (MacOS