Dealing with negative amounts in payment proposal runs in f110

Hi Techies,
In the payment proposal run through f110 transaction is it possible to raise an exception and show the negative amounts seperately?

Dear Ashok,
The scenario is that during the payment proposal run,
if there are two amounts with different due dates, say
10.07.2008     8900 euros to pay
20.07.2008     -800 euros ( the total of the documents at this due date is minus than zero)
Now the program gives one record which says 8100 euros to pay.
But our requirement is that, insted of displaying a single record that adds up the amounts, the negative amount is to be shown seperately like this:
Due date      10.07.2008     8900        euros to pay
Due date     20.07.2008      -800     Exceptions
As this is a standard SAP functiionality, i would like to know any possible ways to achieve this requirement.
Regards,
Madhuri

Similar Messages

How to deal with Invoice after Down Payment

HI ,
I am testing Down payment for vendor and We have activated withholding tax in our company code . I was just wonder how system will behave if we have suppose 50 % of down payment   .
Complete process is as below
Create a request in F-47 for 50 % of Invoice before Invoice comes
then Run f110 and paid to vendor
Now after this Invoice will come and get posted .
Now I have some concerns
1) I have set up Tax codes on payment and enter in f-47 can see tax amount is deducted there .
2 ) How invoice will be processed whether we will deduct whole Wh.Tax or need to set up .
3 how we will deal with rest 50% of payment
Many Thanks

Hi Preeti,
The process is as follows:-
1. 50% Down Payment on Invoice - F-47/F-48/F110
     Vendor (with SPL GL A) - Dr.   50
          To bank A/C                       45
          To TDS A/c                          5
2. Invoice booking of Vendor         - FB60
     Expenses A/C......Dr.           100
          To Vendor                         90
          To TDS                              10
3. Down Payment Clearing - F-54
         Vendor A/C..... Dr                           45
          TDS A/c .... Dr                                 5
                To Vendor With Special GL A    50
TDS also gets adjusted here ( The setting required in SPRO is that you need to tick the " Cent Invoice prop" in withholding tax type for Payment posting)
4. Vendor Payment
      Vendor Dr. 45
        To Bank      45
Regards
Kavita

Unable to enter a negative amount for payment

I am trying to enter a negative amount for payments under order items, but I keep getting this error message:
"The minimum accepted payment amount for 'Financing' is '0'. Please enter an amount greater than '0' to continue.(SBL-SFS-00167)".
The payment method & type I'm using here is "Financing" & "CareCredit". But, when I enter the payment method & type as "Credit Card" & "Visa", I can enter a negative amount without any errors.
I think this requires some configuration to override. Can anyone help me with this issue?
Thanks,
Raghu

Hi,
It's known bug.
Bug number is 10499290.
Visit/contact oracle support for more information.
Good luck
T.Abed

Error in payment proposal run

Hi all,
While making payment proposal for a vendor F110, system is not considering the debit balance line item for the vendor,which inturn leading to incorrect payment amount.For your info all the line item which needs to be paid is getting updated in the payment proposal log except the debit balance line item.
Kindly suggest the configuration to be made which enables the system to consider the debit balance line item of the vendor a/c.
Regards,
Srini

Hi:
Debit balance for vendor means something is to be received from vendor so that it will not be included in payment list. F110 looks for credit line items for postings,. Stand alone debit balances can not be picked up by default since during the payment run you need to net them off first. However if you want to consider debit balance for netting off then, put invoice reference in FB60 , system will club the amount of debit line items with respect to credit line items of that particular invoice. Hope this will help you.
Regards

Payment Proposal Run

Hello ABAPers,
Kindly help me about my problem in payment proposal ... I tried to use
tables REGUP and REGUH..but the i need is to tedious to check with these tables..I want to know what function i will use in order to get the data with these
tables...or any BAPI?
I tried to use FM's
FM_PAYMENT_PROPOSAL_CHECK
FM_PAYMENT_PROPOSAL_CHANGE
but it does work...or no data return..Help
will reward points to those who can help me..
Thanks in advance.
aVaDuDz

no I never tried deleting it first ... thought I wouldnt need to....
could you please let me know the exact steps that I should follow to delete the run.
i.e. do I delete the proposal or the payment ( as the the option to delete is disabled in Proposal ) and the only option I see in payment is "Delete output )
*! this may also be due to the reason that the payment has been carried out....so deletion isnt possible
also would there by any consequences as such if the run is deleted....though the ZS document has not yet been created...
thank you for your help
Edited by: Usman Naeem on Mar 18, 2008 4:40 AM
Edited by: Usman Naeem on Mar 18, 2008 4:44 AM

Payment Proposal run using future date

Hi Gurus,
We have a business requirement where Payment Proposal is done with a Posting date from next period.
For Example:
Lets Say todays date is 04/23/2010 (Period 04 FY 2010)
User runs a proposal with Run Date and Posting Date as 05/05/2010 (Period 05 2010) which is in future. SAP does not allow payment proposals between different periods as the future period would not be open at this time and gives the below error message:
"For company code XXXX period 065/ 2010 has not been opened"
Message FZ321.
Please suggest a way to resolve this kind of situation.
Thanks in Advance,
Ravi Basa Bala

Hi Ravi,
Please check in OBY6 your Ccode, the Field status variant .
Please check in Pstng period variant if 'Propose fiscal year' is flagged.
Indicator: Propose fiscal year
This indicator controls whether the fiscal year is defaulted for display
and change transactions.
Use
In company codes which mainly work with year-dependent document numbers,
you should select this field. This then means that not only the last
document number processed but also the corresponding fiscal year are
defaulted.
For predominantly non-year-dependent document number assignment, you
should leave the field blank. The system then only searches for
documents via the document number.
OB29
Please check if your Fiscal Year Variant is not year-dependent. Periods cannot be maintained for calendar-dependent financial year variants.
Please try in one test system to unflag 'Propose fiscal year' (if it is flagged) in OBY6 and try again.
I hope that this answer your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Dealing with large amounts of data

Hi
I am new to using Flex and BlazeDS. I can see in the FAQ that binary data transfer from server to Flex app is more efficient. My question is: is there a way to build a Flex databound control (e.g. datagrid) which binds to a SQL query or web service or remoting on the server side and then display infinite amount of data as user pages or scrolls using scrollbar? or does the developer have to write code from scratch to deal with paging or deal with infinite scrollbar by asking server for chunks of data at a time?

You have to write your own paginating grid. It's easy to do, just make a canvas, throw a grid and some buttons on it, than when user click to the next page, you make a request to the server and when you have a result, set it as a new data model for the grid.
I would discourage you to return infinite amount of data to the user, provide a search functionality plus pagination.
Hope that helps.

Custom Edits during Payment Proposal/Run - F110

Hi,
While performing a Payment Proposal, the system does some standard validations and gives us a report with "Red" and 'Green" icons showing us which documents are paid/not paid.
I want to add my own edits after system performs its standard validations/edits.
Can any one help me out how this can be down. I tried looking in the Exits, BADI and could not figure any.
I am not sure if we have some BTE
Regards,
Rajasekhar Matukumalli

Hi,
Did any body come across a similar situation? I am still waiting for answers.
Regards,
Rajasekhar

Production order with negative amount for settlement in to Material for MAP

Hi All,
When I am trying to settle some production orders, it is giving me an error "Moving average price for material is negative" and doesnot let me settle them. we have maintained our materials at MAP and settle our production order variances to material to adjust its MAP. In these orders, it is trying to settle negative value, which is greater than the total value of the stock of materials and if settled leaving some of the stock with negative value. does any body has this situation and what would be the solution for this ?
Thanks
MKR

Hi,
This is Pavan Fronm IBGroup Rajnandgaon.
To My Knowledge,
When U Settle the Production Order, the Diffence Between the Target cost and Actual cost(MAP) of Finished Material hits the Material Account of the finished goods.
Say Suppose,
Target cost (Production Cost) =   Cost of Raw material + consumable,   = 10
                                                Activity ( Labour, Power, etc)              =    5
                                                Overheads.                                        =    2
                                                                                17
Actual Cost is ur Finished Material (MAP). = 18
CASE 1:
Now the system calculate the difference as 17 - 18 = -1 Rs , it try to reduce from Material Cost,
Now in case if Material has the stock say 1 unit.
it will reduce the cost of material by 1 rs in Material Master.
If the Material has no stock , as we know the system try to reduce the cost from zero stock tends to
give us a message saying
MOVING AVERAGE PRICE OF MATERIAL IS NEGATIVE.
CASE 2:
If Target - Actual is say +1 RS it increases the material price to 1 Rupee, if stock is Zero , then 1 Rupee
hits the Price Difference
CASE 3: *STANDARD PRICE INDICATOR*
In case of Standard Price indicator Every thing beyone the Material Price , whether respect to negative
variance or positive variance hits the price difference.
So I request u to settle the order if u use MAP for Finished goods befor dispatch of finished good to calculate actual production cost for ur finished material..
We can Also use MR21 for price change if the stock has dispatched befor settlement, but it is not suggestable to my knowledge hence ur material wont carry actual production cost if that is thae case.
Please Correct if I m Wrong.
Regards
J .K .PAVAN KUMAR
SAP PP-PI Consultant
Edited by: PAVANIDLUR on Mar 30, 2009 9:05 PM
Edited by: PAVANIDLUR on Mar 30, 2009 9:09 PM
Edited by: PAVANIDLUR on Mar 30, 2009 9:11 PM

Issue in PE51 form with negative amount

Hi experts,
Im developing employee payslip in HRFORMS transaction by referring the existing PE51 form. Now i face one problem with the payments and deduction amount displayed in the existing PE51 form.
That is, a particular wagetype displayed under deduction column is displayed as +ve amount. But when i checked the corresponding wagetype amount in PC_PAYRESULT, the amount is in negative.
So i want to know whether any logic is written in PE51 form to chnage the negative symbol.
When i checked the rule, i see the below rule.
01 1 XRT BETRG N NE ' 0
Can anyone tell me where the logic for PE51 form is written?

Andrejus, I just tried this in OTN4 build and it works ok for me.
Can you try the following testcase I built?
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/tips/muench/temp/lovdoesnotfiremandatoryattributestest.zip
Run the TestPage.jspx in adfc-config.xml
Click the button to start the "create-employee" task flow.
In the new row, I click the Deptno lov button and pick a department (say, 30) from the LOV.
No mandatory attribute errors are thrown.
NOTE: Notice that in TP4 there is no longer an "ADF Create Form" and that we're encouraging you to create a create form using a method activity that declaratively invokes the create operation, then forwards to a page with a regular ADF Form on it. This is due to the numerous confusions that have always surrounded the ADF "invokeAction" now that we have a visual, declarative mechanism to model this type of initialization activity, we will prefer users adopting that.
Also, notice that the page definition for the method activity has the new "SkipValidation" property set to true.
Can you evolve my testcase into one that still reproduces the problem so I can file a new bug for the remaining problem?

Payment Proposal Run [F110]

hey everyone.....I am in dire need of your help people....
the problem I'm facing right now is something like this...rather the Display log of the payment run is:
                                                                                Date        Time      Message
07.03.2008 10:13:38 Job started
07.03.2008 10:13:38 Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant &0000000005918, user name HMD)
07.03.2008 10:13:38 Log for payment run for payment on 27.02.2008, identification PG028
07.03.2008 10:13:38 For company code PG period 02 / 2008 has not been opened
07.03.2008 10:13:38 ... the execution of the payment program is terminated
07.03.2008 10:13:38 End of log
07.03.2008 10:13:38 Job finished
now I've already tried opening the previous period...but nothing happens.....is there any option of running the procedure again or something...?

no I never tried deleting it first ... thought I wouldnt need to....
could you please let me know the exact steps that I should follow to delete the run.
i.e. do I delete the proposal or the payment ( as the the option to delete is disabled in Proposal ) and the only option I see in payment is "Delete output )
*! this may also be due to the reason that the payment has been carried out....so deletion isnt possible
also would there by any consequences as such if the run is deleted....though the ZS document has not yet been created...
thank you for your help
Edited by: Usman Naeem on Mar 18, 2008 4:40 AM
Edited by: Usman Naeem on Mar 18, 2008 4:44 AM

Sales order with negative amount

let said, i have 1 order, 2 lines.
line 1 has shipment, price is 100.
line 2 is no shipment, price is -50, subsidy purpose.
the lines are uploaded from external system, we use sales order import program to upload.
however, one case is, item code for line 1, was set to inactive.
the sales order import program imported line 2 only, the order closed, and interfaced to receivables (ra_interface_lines_all).
but the autoinvoice fail as the total amount of the order is -50, negative invoices and the transaction type is set to allow only positive sign.
1) order can not be open back and add in the missing line.
2) order can not be discard and recreate a totally new order.
how can I solve this issue?

1) Manually create a new order with +ve qty and interface it to AR. Create manual invoice if necessary.
2) Manually create a credit memo for the customer. And apply it to the above invoice.
To avoid this in future, you should put a delay in your order header workflow.
That way, the header won't close as soon as the lines close. You will have some time to rectify such situations.
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi

How can I deal with negative marking in a quiz marking scheme?

I wonder if anyone can help me with a problem I have in developing the 'code' for a marking scheme for an exam in Captivate 8. I would be very grateful for pointers towards a viable solution. At the moment I am just thrashing around.
My background is in C++ and I think part of my problem is in trying to find analogues of functions I would use in that environment. My experience with Captivate is limited to developing fairly simple training courses but now I need to put an existing exam on line, maintaining its relatively complicated marking scheme, which is as follows:
The paper is multiple choice, each question having four statements, one (or at the most two) of which is true. A completely correct answer gets 4 marks so where there are two correct statements each gets 2 marks. So far, so easy.
The difficulty arises from an element of negative marking. If 3 or more statements are selected, the score is 0 marks. If there is a single correct statement and it and an incorrect statement are selected, the score is 2 marks. If there are 2 correct statements and one of them is selected, the score is 2 marks. If an incorrect statement is selected as well, the score is 1 mark.
I had assumed I could use conditional logic and user variables on a slide-by-slide basis to provide a score value and then assign it to the appropriate system quiz variable, but it seems I can't assign values to variables in a quiz slide. That would have been too easy...
So, can anybody advise me on an approach that keeps the advantages of using the quiz framework, including the use of the Review function?
Any help very gratefully received.

If you use SCORM 1.2 for reporting, negative scores will be converted to zero, because it doesn't allow negative score.
If you want to keep to Review functionality, you need to stay with the default question slides. There are some tweaking possibilities but changing the score is not one of them.
Question Question Slides in Captivate - Captivate blog
Question Question Slides - Part 2 - Captivate blog
I think the only possible way is to use JS, but then you'll not be able to keep the functionality of the Question slides, you are in custom question slides. Plenty of examples of custom questions can be found on my blog as well.

How to deal with large amount of data

Hi folks,
I have a web page that needs 3 maps to serve. Each map will hold about 150,000 entries, and all of them will use about 100MB total. For some users with lots of data (e.g. 1,000,0000 entries), it may use up to 1GB of memory. If few of these high-volume users log in at the same time, it can bring the server down. The data is from the files, I cannot read it on demand because it will be too slow. Loading the data to maps offers me very good performance, but it does not scale. I am thinking to serialize the maps and deserialize them when I need. Is it my only option?
Thanks in advance!

JoachimSauer wrote:
I don't buy the "too slow" argument.
I'd put the data into a database. They are built to handle that amount of data.++

Need help in formating a form dealing with negative currency

Need Help!!!
Creating forms in Adobe acrobat Pro I could format a number cell to calculate additions/subtractions of currency. If the result was negative I could get the cell to show the negative result in red text and show parentheses around them. How can I do that in LiveCycle?
If i have to use formcalc - what would i type in?

In LiveCycle can be done using the Numeric Field object and some formcalc script.
Use the "Numeric Field" from the Object Library. For the Field patterns (Select the placed numeric field, On object Window Object -> Field) use "num.currency{}" to show the currency(Ex: $) and "parentheses" if its negative. Write some script to show red text/border in red .
On exit event of the Numeric Field here is the script:
if($.rawValue <0) then $.font.fill.color.value = "255,0,0" endif // This will make entire text in red color if the value is negative.
if($.rawValue <0) then $.validate.nullTest = "error" endif //This will make border of the field in red color if the value is negative.
Hope this helps.

Dealing with negative amounts in payment proposal runs in f110

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for