Deep linking not working as expected

Hello,
I'm trying to use the deep linking feature of JHS (10.1.3.2).
The "Query by Key Value" type of deep link works only if a query (like a search) was issued first. Something like how I would expect the "Set current row using key value" type to work.
Here's the pagedef fragment that gets generated - it looks ok to me...
<invokeAction id="queryByKeyValueWorkscopeInvoke"
Binds="queryByKeyValueWorkscope" Refresh="prepareModel"
RefreshCondition="#{!empty param.instanceId}"/>
The "auto query" flag is set to false for this group, could that be a reason?
Thanks in advance,
Igor

Hi,
Thank you for responding!
I created a new project for HR schema to make sure it wasn't some mistake. The only things that I changed from the default were setting the layout to "form", making adv search a separate page and setting "autoquery" to FALSE.
The result is still the same: deep link only works if there was a search performed before in that HTTP session.
here's the example of URL that I'm using:
http://mypc:8988/HrWeb/faces/pages/Employees.jspx?instanceId=108
I'm pretty sure I'm not missing anything because the link works most of the time.
I can upload the project if that helps.
Best regards,
Igor
Edited by: igorbunov on Jul 7, 2009 2:33 PM
Edited by: igorbunov on Jul 7, 2009 3:41 PM

Similar Messages

  • Deep linking not working in Flex 4

    Deep linking is working in Flex 4 (using Flash Builder) when I debug and run the application, but not when I do an export release build.
    So I tried using the files from the bin-debug directory, and noticed that deep linking only works when the files are in the bin-debug directory. If I move them from there, they don't work.
    And to make things worse, my Flex 3 builder is not generating the HTML wrapper when using the Flex 4 SDK and deep linking. So I am screwed in every way. I really need help to get my app launched. It is finished, but stuck on my computer.
    Is this a know problem? Thanks very much for any help.

    If anyone run into this poblem, I just figured out half the problem. The javascript file (history.js in the history directory) only checks for url with (http://), so if you are testing and in your browser you have file://loc_of_html_file, then it will not work.
    On the other hand, my next problem is still unresolved:
    Flex Builder 3 is not generating the HTML wrapper when using deep linking AND with the Flex 4 SDK.
    Thanks.

  • Deep linking not working in internet explorer 8.

    Even a simple example of deep linking does not seem to work in IE8.
    http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=deep_linking_3.html
    My Google searches seem to indicate it might not even wor in IE 6 and IE7.
    Please tell me there is a work around.

    Are you saying deep linking may not appear to work when working in Flex Builder, but it will work when the app has been deployed to the server?
    Thanks very much Alex.

  • Dynamic link not working as expected

    maybe I'm missing something.  I am in premier cc2014, I select an in and out of my timeline and choose "adobe dynamic link->new after effect composition"
    it opens up ae and makes a comp but it is completey empty...and the length of the comp is 30 seconds but my in and out were much less than that
    This is my first attempt at doing this, but I thought it was supposed to be pretty straight forward.  Am I not understanding how dynamic link is supposed to work?

    What you need to do is select all the clips or the ones you want on the timeline right click and select "replace with AE composition" then it will take all of them into AE.

  • Adobe Edge links not working

    Yeah I have also experienced links not working when I import my .oam file from Adobe Edge Animate also. Is there anything the Muse team is doing to fix this issue? I need a response from you guys by the end of the week. my company website is malfunctioning due to issues with your software. If there is some sort of hotfix please let us know.

    When you install the software illegally, using a volume license, there is a script you can run that will enter all of the adobe servers into your local DNS hosts file so the software can be activated. This makes accessing those domains impossible. This scenario fits the description of your issue, not suggesting anything beyond that.
    The hosts file is in /private/etc/hosts and can be accessed through the terminal:
    sudo nano /private/etc/hosts
    If you see a bunch of adobe servers in there, that is your problem.

  • Add new document link not working in upgraded sharepoint 2013?

    Hello there,
    Upgraded SharePoint team sites from 2010 to 2013. add new document link not working for shared document in upgraded sharepoint 2013?. it is specially not working on machine where Office web apps set up with this sharePoint server and it
    is working fine with environment  Office web apps not configured with Sharepoint.
    Looking resoluion /suggestion, thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sushil

    Hi  Sushil,
    According to your description, my understanding is that the add new document link was not working on machine where Office web apps set up with this SharePoint server after you upgraded SharePoint team sites
    from 2010 to 2013.
    For your issue, it can be caused by integrating Office Web Apps with upgraded SharePoint Site.
    Firstly please make sure claims-based authentication is used by the SharePoint web application that is used to create the new document. Only web applications that use claims-based authentication can open
    files in Office Web Apps. To determine the authentication provider for a web application, follow these steps:
    1.In SharePoint 2013 Central Administration, click Manage web applications.
    2.Select the web application that you want to check, and click Authentication Providers on the ribbon.
    The authentication provider must be displayed as Claims Based Authentication for Office Web Apps to work correctly with the web application. To resolve this issue, you can delete the web application and recreate
    it using claims-based authentication, or you can change the authentication method of the web application.
    Secondly, make sure the WOPI zones match on the SharePoint 2013 and the Office Web Apps Server farm.
    To do this, run the following command on the SharePoint Server:
    Get-SPWopiZone
    The result will be one of the following:.
    internal-https
    internal-http
    external-https
    external-http
    Next, run the following command on the SharePoint Server.
    Get-SPWOPIBinding
    In the output, look for WopiZone: zone. If the results from Get-SPWopiZone don’t match the zone that is returned by Get-SPWOPIBinding, run the Set-SPWOPIZone -Zone cmdlet on the SharePoint Server to change
    the WOPI zone to match the result from Get-SPWOPIBinding.
    If not work, you can try to disconnect SharePoint 2013 from Office Web Apps Server and re-configure Office Web Apps for SharePoint 2013.
    For more information, please refer to the article:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff431687(v=office.15).aspx
    Best Regards,
    Eric
    Eric Tao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Silverlight 5 binding on a property with logic in its setter does not work as expected when debug is attached

    My problem is pretty easy to reproduce.
    I created a project from scratch with a view model.
    As you can see in the setter of "Age" property I have a simple logic.
        public class MainViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
                public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
                private int age;
                public int Age
                    get
                        return age;
                    set
                        /*Age has to be over 18* - a simple condition in the setter*/
                        age = value;
                        if(age <= 18)
                            age = 18;
                        OnPropertyChanged("Age");
                public MainViewModel(int age)
                    this.Age = age;
                private void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
                    if (this.PropertyChanged != null)
                        PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
    In the MainPage.xaml 
         <Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot" Background="White">
                <TextBox 
                    Text="{Binding Path=Age, Mode=TwoWay}" 
                    HorizontalAlignment="Left"
                    Width="100"
                    Height="25"/>
                <TextBlock
                    Text="{Binding Path=Age, Mode=OneWay}"
                    HorizontalAlignment="Right"
                    Width="100"
                    Height="25"/>
            </Grid>
    And MainPage.xaml.cs I simply instantiate the view model and set it as a DataContext.
        public partial class MainPage : UserControl
            private MainViewModel mvm;
            public MainPage()
                InitializeComponent();
                mvm = new MainViewModel(20);
                this.DataContext = mvm;
    I expect that this code will limit set the Age to 18 if the value entered in the TextBox is lower than 18.
    Scenario: Insert into TextBox the value "5" and press tab (for the binding the take effect, TextBox needs to lose the focus)
    Case 1: Debugger is attached =>
    TextBox value will be "5" and TextBlock value will be "18" as expected. - WRONG
    Case 2: Debugger is NOT attached => 
    TextBox value will be "18" and TextBlock value will be "18" - CORRECT
    It seems that when debugger is attached the binding does not work as expected on the object that triggered the update of the property value. This happens only if the property to which we are binding has some logic into the setter or getter.
    Has something changed in SL5 and logic in setters is not allowed anymore?
    Configuration:
    VisualStudio 2010 SP1
    SL 5 Tools 5.1.30214.0
    SL5 sdk 5.0.61118.0
    IE 10
    Thanks!                                       

    Inputting the value and changing it straight away is relatively rare.
    Very few people are now using Silverlight because it's kind of deprecated...
    This is why nobody has reported this.
    I certainly never noticed this problem and I have a number of live Silverlight systems out there.
    Some of which are huge.
    If you want a "fix":
    private void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
    if (this.PropertyChanged != null)
    //PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
    Storyboard sb = new Storyboard();
    sb.Duration = new Duration(new TimeSpan(0, 0, 0, 0, 100));
    sb.Completed += delegate
    PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
    sb.Begin();
    The fact this works is interesting because (I think ) it means the textbox can't be updated at the point the propertychanged is raised.
    Please don't forget to upvote posts which you like and mark those which answer your question.
    My latest Technet article - Dynamic XAML

  • Fresh Install HCM 9.1 but Links not working. Help please

    Dear All,
    I'm trying to make a switch from SAP to PeopleSoft. I tought it easier to install PSFT since the number of source to install is much less than SAP. However, I kept getting same error where the links not working no matter which environment I tried to install.
    I downloaded all software from eDelivery.
    HCM 9.1, PTOOLS 8.52, Oracle 11g 64 bit, Oracle Client 32 bit.
    First Try:
    Install on windows 7 64bit. Everything works fine until first login to the PSFT and all links not working.
    Suggestion from Hakan is to apply the patch and gave me a link to the old FTP site. I downloaded the 85209 patch but got password.
    Finally I managed to get a customer ID from a friend and downloaded Patch 85211 and applied. But got java error so I scrapped it.
    Anyway, Gasparotto said the environment is not certified and will not fix my problem with the patch.
    Second Try:
    Installed Virtual Box.
    Installed Windows 2008 R2 and applied the SP1.
    Installed everything all over again.
    Ensured the PTWEBSERVER password similar the username.
    Everything works fine but when login to PSFT, again..... links not working and see on the bottom left corner there are some javascript error where they cannot find certain peoplesoft objects..
    Just upgraded to IE 9 because I read somewhere IE 8 is not certified.
    Tried to login again, no error message and everything looks fine but... links not working.
    Logs also looks normal to me.
    Does anyone ever encountered similar issues before?
    Does this is a normal behaviour before tools patch 85211 being applied ?
    Thanks,
    aLuNa
    My APPSRV Log:
    PSSAMSRV.12 (0) [11/03/12 09:04:46](0) PeopleTools Release 8.52 (WinX86) starting. Tuxedo server is APPSRV(99)/100
    PSSAMSRV.12 (0) [11/03/12 09:04:46](0) Cache Directory being used: C:\APPSRV_CONFIG\appserv\HCDMO\CACHE\PSSAMSRV_100\
    PSSAMSRV.12 (0) [11/03/12 09:04:46](0) Server started
    PSRENSRV.2808 [11/03/12 09:04:49](0) PeopleTools Release 8.52 (WinX86) starting. Tuxedo server is RENGRP(92)/101
    PSRENSRV.2808 [11/03/12 09:04:49](3) Switching to new log file C:\APPSRV_CONFIG\appserv\HCDMO\LOGS\PSRENSRV_1103.LOG
    PSADMIN.2124 (0) [11/03/12 09:04:52](0) End boot attempt on domain HCDMO
    PSAPPSRV.1488 (3) [11/03/12 09:13:16 GetCertificate](3) Returning context. ID=PTWEBSERVER, Lang=ENG, UStreamId=091316_1488.3, Token=PSFT_HR/2012-11-03-02.13.17.193528/PTWEBSERVER/ENG/XxZ3vyJWXF/S1MoQtG2Wox6wGJA=
    PSAPPSRV.1488 (5) [11/03/12 09:13:21 GetCertificate](3) Returning context. ID=PTWEBSERVER, Lang=ENG, UStreamId=091321_1488.5, Token=PSFT_HR/2012-11-03-02.13.22.193632/PTWEBSERVER/ENG/pS6ec6pIAJJSYc1oOWcNYiR0UFQ=
    PSAPPSRV.1488 (7) [11/03/12 09:13:29 GetCertificate](3) Returning context. ID=PS, Lang=ENG, UStreamId=091329_1488.7, Token=PSFT_HR/2012-11-03-02.13.30.193285/PS/ENG/3GnOezS6D9PUlzwrjPwqexv4ir0=
    PSAPPSRV.1488 (34) [11/03/12 09:18:47 GetCertificate](3) Returning context. ID=PS, Lang=ENG, UStreamId=091847_1488.34, Token=PSFT_HR/2012-11-03-02.18.48.194158/PS/ENG//oJB5tvSHYNzsmZ2Gs4g2vBLUVs=

    alunwawa wrote:
    Does anyone ever encountered similar issues before? Yes, I did already see the same, that was when installed the same with 8.52.00 (without Peopletools patch) or without applying the patch project...
    Does this is a normal behaviour before tools patch 85211 being applied ?Without patch, you have the error you mentioned. How many time I told that 8.52.03 min. is required, I did not go further, but there was some bugs before which make it not working.
    I understand that's rather frustrating for people who wants to jump to Peoplesoft. I don't know SAP, but here you go, Peoplesoft is not a simple toy.
    Unfortunately, if you have no access to My Oracle Support to get the Peoplesoft patches, you have no way but work on Peoplesoft OVM (free of use), and to use them on VirtualBox, the Jim's articles are worth to follow.
    Nicolas.
    PS: @Jim, thanks for the kind words.
    My last install guide is quite old now (PT8.50/Linux), even though it did not change very much within the last tools 8.52. But seeing the number of time such questions have asked over here (PT8.52 on Windows), I'm thinking to write one more, that time on Windows.

  • Purchased Lightroom 5 and Download link not working. Please advise

    I have Purchased Lightroom 5 followed the download instructions and Download link not working.
    I get a dialog box stating that I have Explorer 4 and I need a later version.
    I am in fact running Explorer 10.
    Please advise.
    Bob Spree
    England

    Please see http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1229333 where this topic has been discussed.

  • Subtraction of two key figures normalized to result not working as expected

    Hello SAP Community!
    I am having problems with getting the right result from a subtraction of two KFs which are "normalized to results" which means the KFs really have values expressed as percentages. The substraction that should be performed is of two percentages (e.g.: 87.298% - 85.527% = 1.77%) but my report prints out the result as "number of units" instead (e.g.: 87.298% - 85.527% = 71,514.00 EA). The two normalized KFs actually "point" to two stock KFs, hence the "number of units".
    In order to explain the problem I am facing please analyze below text:
    1) Let's assume I have below data:
    LOAD MONTH  PLANT    MATERIAL HORIZON MONTH     FORECAST UNITS
    200805         PLANT-A  MAT-1            200805         510,235.00
    200805         PLANT-B  MAT-1           200805          74,240.00
    200805         PLANT-A  MAT-1           200806         438,721.00
    200805         PLANT-B  MAT-1           200806          74,240.00
    200805         PLANT-A  MAT-1           200807         356,981.00
    200805         PLANT-B  MAT-1           200807          74,240.00
    200806         PLANT-A  MAT-1           200805               0.00
    200806         PLANT-B  MAT-1           200805               0.00
    200806         PLANT-A  MAT-1           200806         510,235.00
    200806         PLANT-B  MAT-1           200806          74,240.00
    200806         PLANT-A  MAT-1           200807         438,721.00
    200806         PLANT-B  MAT-1           200807          74,240.00
    2) Then, assume I have a comparison report, restricted by load month for two months May and June 2008 (filter restricted by two month variables) with FORECAST units spread accross columns for whole horizon (two months also in this case).
    Material  Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
    ===================================================================
    MAT1      PLANT-A  
                       Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00  356,981.00
                       Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00  438,721.00
              PLANT-B  
                       Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                       Comparison Units (June 2008)  74,240.00   74,240.00
              TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00  431,221.00
                       Comparison Units             584,475.00  512,961.00
    3) Now, let's suppose we want to know the proportions (%) of Base vs Comparison units, so
    we normalize forecats to results an we get the below report:
    Material  Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
    ===================================================================
    MAT1      PLANT-A  
                       Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00  356,981.00
                       Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                       Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00  438,721.00
                       Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
              PLANT-B  
                       Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                       Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                       Comparison Units (June 2008)  74,240.00   74,240.00
                       Comparison Units %(Jun 2008)  12.702%     17.216%
              TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00  431,221.00
                       Comparison Units             584,475.00  512,961.00
    4) Finally, let's suppose we want to know the deltas (differences) of Base vs Comparison
    units, for both number of units and %. The report now look as below:
    Material  Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
    ===================================================================
    MAT1      PLANT-A  
                       Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00  356,981.00
                       Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                       Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00  438,721.00
                       Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
                       Delta base vs. comp. units %  1.77%       2.74%
                       Delta base vs. comp. units    71,514.00  81,740.00
              PLANT-B  
                       Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                       Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                       Comparison Units (June 2008)  74,240.00   74,240.00
                       Comparison Units %(Jun 2008)  12.702%     17.216%
                       Delta base vs. comp. units %  -1.77%      -2.74%
                       Delta base vs. comp. units         0.00        0.00
              TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00  431,221.00
                       Comparison Units             584,475.00  512,961.00
    5) PROBLEM:
    In my report, the "Delta base vs. comp. units %" is not working as expected and
    calculates number of units just as "Delta base vs. comp. units" does instead of calculating the % difference.
    So my report looks as follows:
    Material  Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
    ===================================================================
    MAT1      PLANT-A  
                       Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00  356,981.00
                       Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                       Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00  438,721.00
                       Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
                       Delta base vs. comp. units %  71,514.00  81,740.00 <<<WRONG!!
                       Delta base vs. comp. units    71,514.00  81,740.00
              PLANT-B  
                       Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                       Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                       Comparison Units (June 2008)  74,240.00   74,240.00
                       Comparison Units %(Jun 2008)  12.702%     17.216%
                       Delta base vs. comp. units %       0.00        0.00
                       Delta base vs. comp. units         0.00        0.00
              TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00  431,221.00
                       Comparison Units             584,475.00  512,961.00
    The formulas are:
    a) Delta base vs. comp. units %
      Delta base vs. comp. units % = Comparison Units % - Base Units %
    b) Delta base vs. comp. units
      Delta base vs. comp. units = Comparison Units - Base Units
    The KFs
    - Comparison Units %
    - Base Units %
    Are RESTRICTED key figures (restricted to Base and comparison month variables) which
    are setup as:
    1) Calculate Result As:  Summation of Rounded Values
    2) Calculate Single Value as: Normalization of result
    3) Calculate Along the Rows
    The KFs
    - Delta base vs. comp. units %
    - Delta base vs. comp. units
    are FORMULAS setup to:
    1) Calculate Result As:  Nothing defined
    2) Calculate Single Value as: Nothing defined
    3) Calculate Along the Rows: user default direction (grayed out)
    Thanks for the time taken to read in detail all of this. Long text but necessary to understand what the problem is.
    Any help is highly appreciated.
    Thank you.
    Mario

    Hi,
    The subraction will be carried out before doing the normalization of your KF's. So, it is displaying "number of units". Create a calculated keyfigure and subtract the KF's and in the properties of this calculated keyfigure, change the enhancement as "After Aggregation".
    I hope this will solve your issue.
    Regards,
    S P.

  • Events in SubVi not working as expected

    Hi, I am reposting this question as my previous one didn't resulted in any satisfactory conclusion.
    I have attached my Vi's which are not working as expected. If I remove ONE subVi and its associated 3 controls and two indicators, the other one works just fine, but when I add two SUB Vis, it goes messy. I am trying to learn this way, I am sure it can be done many other ways, but please help me finding out the problem doing it this way as in my final MainVi, I would like to use 8 such sub Vis. Thanks.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    Main.vi ‏11 KB
    SubVi.vi ‏12 KB
    SubVi_2.vi ‏15 KB

    Your main problem is DATA FLOW.  A loop cannot iterate until EVERYTHING in it has completed.  So, as you have it, you have to have both event structures execture before you can go back to look for the next event.  So if you insist on having these subVIs, they need to be in seperate loops.
    BTW, you can get away with a single subVI.  Go into the VI properties and make it reentrant (preallocated clone).  Then each call of your subVI will have its own memory space.  A lot easier to maintain that way.
    And I know you said you didn't want alternatives, but here's how you can do it all with a single event structure in your main loop.
    There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
    Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
    Attachments:
    Main_MODTR.vi ‏10 KB

  • Links not working correctly in PCUI for CRM

    Hi All,
    We are implementing mySAP CRM 4.0 through PCUI on Portal
    EP6 SP14.
    I have integrated the CRM Business Package 60.2 in Portal.
    Proper User has been created in the backend and assigned Sales Manager Role both in the portal and in the CRM backend.
    We are facing problem of links not working in the CRM Contents. When we click on the links in the CRM Portal Contents ( BSPs) we don’t get the desired application opening.
    When we click any links in the BSP's ( Activity Links in Opportunity Management BSP ) we get a blank page popped up.
    I have the screen shots with me. Any one responding can get the screen shots from me.
    Thanks in Advance
    Rohit

    Rohit,
    Have you maintained configuration in (transaction CRMC_BLUEPRINT_C --> Navigation (URL Generation) --> Assign Object Method to Role)? Be sure that the role that you are using is present and ID Page/Service field correctly points to the pcd url for your portal.
    When testing, it may be helpful to set parameter CRM_URL_BUFFER_OFF = X on the user profile (SU01) to turn off the url buffer. That way changes made above are immediate.
    Best Regards,
    Bernard

  • AFS ARUN Size Substitution Not Working As Expected

    Hi All,
    I need help with this. If any one of you have worked with AFS ARUN size substitution, kindly provide me with some details on how can I set it up. I am specially interested in setting up size substitution with two-dimensional grids.
    I have setup some examples but it does not work as expected.
    Here is a small example:
    Say I have a size 28/30, 28/32 .........29/30....
    What I want to achieve is that during ARUN if there is a shortage of stock in 28/30 then the remaining requirement qty should be confirmed from size 28/32.
    with my setup after 28/30 it goes into looking for stock in 29/30, which is what I do not want.
    Any inputs will be really appreciated.
    Thanks!!

    srdfrn wrote:
    Hi YOS,
    I tried importing a PCX image into CVI 2010 and then sizing the image to the control and didn't see the behavior you have been describing.  Would you mind posting an example (alongside an image file) that demonstrates this?
    Also, one thing I noticed is that PCX images appear to be quite dated.  Could upgrading them to a JPEG or PNG format be an option for you?
    Thanks,
    Stephanie R.
    National Instruments
    Stephanie, thanks for the reply.
    I am very sorry to state that I made a mistake.
    VAL_SIZE_TO_IMAGE indeed works.
    What fails to work is VAL_SIZE_TO_PICTURE. (Second option in Fit Mode attribute in control editing panel)
    I tried with JPEG and it's the same.
    I am attaching an example.(Load_Image.c & ONEP_3Trow_POS1.JPG)
    A panel with two picture rings.
    - SW_1 remains at the intended size and the loaded picture is not clear.
    - SW_2 will fit to picture size and looks OK.
    Appreciate your support,
    YOSsi Seter
    Attachments:
    Load_Image.c ‏2 KB
    ONEP_3Trow_POS1.JPG ‏4 KB

  • Web links not working in iPhone calendar notes. Used to work. Ideas?

    Web links not working in iPhone calendar notes. Used to work. Ideas?

    Basic troubleshooting from the User's Guide is reset, restart, restore (first from backup then as new).  Has any of this been tried?

  • Why Does Dynamic Link Not Work

    I purchased the CS5 Adobe Production Premium.  I have been working in Premiere and I have been learning about how to use Dynamic Link. I want to be able to alter clips in After Effects and bring them back and forth into Premiere.  When I go to File/ Adobe Dynamic Link/New After Effect Composition, I get this message:
    Adobe Dynamic Link Requires Adobe Production Premium.
    Since I own production premium, I do not know why I am getting this message.  I have reinstalled the CS5 Production Premium Software twice and it still gives me the same message.  What can I do to get Dynamic Link Working.

    Thank you for the tip.  Could you possibly tell me how to deactivate and
    then reactivate the suite.  I am using a Macbook Pro laptop running OS
    10.6.4.  I do not even know where to start.
    From:   Colin Brougham <[email protected]>
    To:     Dan Seanor <[email protected]>
    Date:   03/15/2011 09:55 AM
    Subject:        Why Does Dynamic Link Not Work
    Deactivate the software (not uninstall), and then reactivate the suite.
    This often fixes this. You can opt to leave the serial number on the
    system; no need to clear it and re-enter it.

Maybe you are looking for