Default Evaluation Path in OM

Hi HR Experts,
I am really new to OM and this question might be a stupid one. But anyway here it goes.... Is there a way to default an evaluation path that will be used? Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Arvin

Ho Evaluation paths are incoporated to the relationship..... Its already defaulted by SAP.. An evaluation path is an instruction to the system which determines which object types and relationship(s) are to be included in an evaluation of your organizational plan.
For more check in SPRO>Personnel Management>Organizational Management->Basic Settings-->Maintain Evaluation Paths

Similar Messages

  • Re: Depth of Evaluation for Standard Evaluation Paths (Bottom Up Approach)

    Hi All,
    We are facing a unique issue when using OOSP and defining evaluation path. for e.g. we used the standard SBESX (Staff assignments along Organizational structure). We also defined the following fields to test the Org structure results for a user's structural authorization on what he/she can see (e.g. Org unit(O), Positions(S), Users(P))
    1. Object Type = O
    2. Evalutaion Path = SBESX
    3. Status vector = 12345
    4. Depth (D) = 5 (which defaults to 1 automatically if we set the sign field to -(negative) for Bottom-up approach (displaying org structure bottom to up)
    5. Function Module = RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT
    6. Key Date = D
    The issue we have is for the above settings on OOSP Depth field defaults to 1 everytime we use the Bottom up approach (i.e setting the Sign field to - (negative)). Has anyone encountered the above problem with the depth field? Let us know if you had any fix or you had to escalate this to SAP?
    Best regards,
    -Murali

    S0003562672 wrote:>
    > hi murali,
    >
    > I cannot give you an answer on why exactly the depth filed is defaulting to 1 when using the negative in the sign fields (T77PR-SSIGN).  but can you perhaps explain what you're trying to accomplish with your structural profile.  in that case, maybe I/we can figure out a way to circumvent the use of the sign field...
    >
    > Edited by: Dimitri van Heumen on Mar 19, 2008 2:24 PM
    > (typing errors)
    Thanks for your reply Dimitri.
    Here is what we are trying to acheive with the Org structure below:
                                                                          O - 00001004
                                                                            S - 00000253
                                      O - 00001005                                                O - 00001006
                                           S – 00000251 hradmin1                               S – 00000256 essuser2 (120)
                                           S - 00000252
                   O - 00001007                   O - 00001008                     O - 00001009          O - 00001010
                   S - 00000257                     S - 00000259                     S - 00000260(121)    S - 00000254 (122)
                   S – 00000258  essuser1                                                                            S – 0000255 hradmin2(114)
    Position # 00000255 (far right down below in the above Org structure) is the HR Specialist for (Org #00001006 and Org #00001009).  Employee # 114 (far right bottom) has been hired into this position 255. They should be able to see Employees 120, 121, 122 and themselves(114).
    We have created a structural profile for the user hradmin2(114) and attached him to a role which has ess/mss functionality. We are trying to use the evaluation path SBESX to test what org units, postions and users this user hradmin2(114) can see which should meet the requirement stated above that he should see 120,121,122 and 114 themselves.
    So from the Org structure above it is a bottom up scenerio where hradmin2 must see org units 00001010, 00001009 and 00001006 and whenever we set the sign field to -ve (bottom up approach of displaying org structure) and depth of lets say 4 it automatically defaluts to 1 and when we check hradmin2 authorization profile in oosb we only see org unit 00001010 being displayed and not the org units above it for this bottom up approach.
    Are you aware of any methods to acheive this for the org structure above?
    Thanks
    -Murali
    Edited by: Murali Sripadam on Mar 19, 2008 1:47 PM

  • Report RHSTRU00 with Evaluation Path BOSSORG is not working

    Hello Friends,
    I am trying to run the Report RHSTRU00 with Evaluation Path BOSSORG  and it never produces output. If I run the report with any  other Evaluation path,it works......
    Can anybody help me in this issue,
    Thanks
    Kisu

    solved on own.

  • SBS 2011 GPO for changing the default save path applying to Win7 but not working

    So this is a strange one. I've got an SBS 2011 server that's the only domain controller in the org. I've created a GPO to change the default save location for Excel 2013 and Word 2013 using the Office 2013 ADMX files which were installed to the PolicyDefinitions
    folder.
    The GPO (U-Office2013 Default Save Location) only contains:
    1. User Configuration - Microsoft Excel 2013/Excel Options/Save - Default file location - Enabled - Z:\
    2. User Configuration - Microsoft Word 2013/Word Options/Advanced/File Locations - Default file location - Enabled - Z:\
    The GPO is linked at the OU that contains my users for my SBS organization.
    When I do a gpupdate /force on a windows 7 system with office2013 installed, and then run a gpresult/rsop, the policy appears to be applied successfully as it lists my GPO under the Applied GPOs list on the workstation:
    Applied GPOs
    Default Domain Policy dyndns.local AD (24), Sysvol (24)
    U-Office2013 Default Save Location domain.local/SBSusers AD (6), Sysvol (6)
    In the gpresult report, the applied settings appear under:
    Administrative Templates
    Extra Registry Settings
    software\policies\microsoft\office\15.0\excel\options\defaultpath Z:\ U-Office2013 Default Save Location
    software\policies\microsoft\office\15.0\word\options\doc-path Z:\ U-Office2013 Default Save Location
    BUT, when I go to the workstation, and check office->options-Save-default file path, the path has not been changed to what the GPO is pushing.
    The strange thing is that in my test environment running 2008R2 server and Win7 with Office 2013 and identical settings the default save location is applied and works as expected.
    Any ideas?
    I've already tried re-installing the ADMX templates and re-created the GPO's several times.
    Thanks in advance.

    When a group policy is not applying, it is often that it has been linked to the wrong OU. Please first check this.
    You might also check the apply status on the client site based on the GPSVC.log.
    How to enable GPO logging:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/csstwplatform/archive/2010/11/09/how-to-enable-gpo-logging-on-windows-7-2008-r2.aspx
    It looks more like an issue on server side than an issue of Office Group Policy settings. Try to post in Server forum and see if there is any luck:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/home?category=windowsserver

  • Need help changing the default Save Path

    Hello,
    We are implementing SAP, and will be using Citrix as the source for the GUI.  One of our requirnments are, that we need to change the default "Save Path" that users save documents too.   By default, this is to the C drive, but, we need it set to a different drive (i.e. V: on the citrix server).
    We found this note on SDN (see below) - however, it does not explain how to change or add this registry value?  Is this done in the GUI options, or in regedit?  If in reg-edit, where abouts in the tree does it go?
    Thanks guys, and any help would be greatly appriciated.
    Richard
    (As of SAP GUI 7.20, patch level 4) the REG_EXPAND_SZ registry value InitSaveDir can be used to configure the default path and folder for users to save the reported information in case of an access denial due to security rules. If users change the default path and save the information to an individual location, this new path will be kept as long as the user does not terminate the program. When starting SAP GUI again, users will get the configured default path again to store the reported information, the individual path changes will be lost. If the registry value does not exist, the default directory is the document directory of the SAP GUI.
    By default none of the above registry values exists. In order to change the behavior of the security module, the registry values need to be created and set to the desired value. A not existing registry value means use the default.
    In this doc:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/002444be-7018-2d10-e18e-a8c537198ef6?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true

    Hi,
    "Security rules that are created for a large number of users can be centrally stored on a server by an administrator. The administrator can use the registry values below under the registry key
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\SAP\SAPGUI Front\SAP Frontend Server\Security]
    to configure the behavior of the security module.
    Note: For 64 bit operating systems please use the following registry key
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\SAP\SAPGUI Front\SAP Frontend Server\Security]
    to configure the behavior of the security module."
    You can use regedit for installing this values.
    Best Regards,
    Aleh

  • How to set default file path while downloading alv output

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me that how to set default file path while downloading the ALV output to system using Local file button on tool bar.
    Please look below screenshots:
    Kindly help me resolve it.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ashutosh Katara

    This information initial value is (maybe) stored in Windows Register (register.exe) at Software\SAP\SAPGUI Front\SAP Frontend Server\Filetransfer -> PathDownload, you can read it thru class CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES method GET_UPLOAD_DOWNLOAD_PATH and update it thru method REGISTRY_SET_VALUE. (Else there may be some parameter ID to force data, but I'm no longer sure)
    Regards,
    Raymond

  • How do I set the default file path for the Place command?

    I keep my graphics files for each document in a particular folder. Every time I open an existing InDesign document and place a new image I have to browse back to that location - even though all of the previous images in that document came from the same folder. InDesign does not remember the file path that was used previously in the document. This is very annoying.
    IS THERE A WAY TO SET THE DEFAULT FILE PATH, OR LOCATION, FOR IMAGE FILES?
    I have looked through the preferences, searched the forums and internet, but I have not found any reference to setting default paths. Is there a setting like the one in MS Word called "File Locations" on the Options toolbox?
    Thank you.

    Since you're working in ID on Windows, you can take advantage of a neat trick in Windows. Copy the file path out of the File Explorer address bar and paste it directly into the Place filename field. That will jump you directly to the desired volume. For example, let's say I want to place a graphic located at X:\PS Jobs\May PS\709672bp\Working Source Files\Links. I copy that entire path from the File Explorer address bar, go to InDesign, select File|Place, and press Control + V to paste that path into the filename field. I press the Open button and Shazam! I'm there instantly, without a bunch of navigation.
    You can do the same thing in the File|Save As and File|Export fields. Let's say you want export a PDF file from InDesign to the volume X:\PS Jobs\May PS\709672bp\Working PDF Files. First copy the desired file path from the File Explorer window. In InDesign, select File|Export, click anywhere in the filename field, and press the Home key to move the insertion point to the front of the filename. Press Control + V to paste that path in front of the filename, then add the backslash character (\). The filename will now look like this: X:\PS Jobs\May PS\709672bp\Working PDF Files\Filename.pdf. Press the Save button to bring up the Export Adobe PDF window. Select your desired PDF preset, press the Export button, and the PDF file will magically appear in the desired volume.
    This sounds really complicated, but it's not. In practice, it only takes a few seconds. I probably save an hour's worth of needless navigation every day with this technique.

  • Regarding Evaluation path used in Organisation structure.

    Dear All,
    How would i be able to get to know the evaluation path used by organisational structure to display the structure. What i found in tcode : ppome is that it is showing evaluation but not path name. I want to know the reference path name which it is using.
    Thanks,
    Raj

    Hi
    Check the Report:
    RHINFAW0 - Infotype reporting.
    Regards,
    Sreeram

  • Evaluation paths in MSS

    Hi
    Our client is using "matrix" relationships A/B002 (is line supervisor of) in their organisation and wants to display them in MSS (latest version) teamviewer. We are using evaluation path WF_POSIT (User/person has as position)as rule for root objects and ORGA-P (Supervisory and subordinate positions with person display) as rule for target objects. However we are only able to show relationships 002 which are below the manager's position in the organisation and not those which are elsewhere in the organisation. This worked before with the client before our upgrade project.
    Can you advise if it's possible to show the 002 (is line supevisor of) relationships in MSS from all over the organisational structure (not only below the manager) with these evaluation paths or should some others be used?
    We can only see the 002's below the manager with or without structural authorizations and before the upgrade the evaluation paths were not modified from standard and permitted relationships are also the same.
    Any thoughts would be helpful.
    -JT

    Hello Raj,
    you need so called Structural Authorizations to accomplish your requirenment. But be aware this has a direct effect on your entire HR-based Authorization concept in your company if you switch it on!
    To activate Structural Authorizations call transaction OOAC and set the switch for ORGPD to a proper value which does meet your needs. (See http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c7/4aba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm) If it is already set to a value <> 0 is is already activated.
    The next thing you need to do is to maintain your Manager Role. The authorization object in question is P_ORGIN. If you want for instance to give a user read access to Infotype 0001 of another person you provide the following values:
    - AUTHC: R
    - INFTY: 0001
    - PERSA: *
    - PERSG: *
    - PERSK: *
    - SUBTY: *
    - VDSK1: *
    If you would stop here, every user would have access to Infotype 0001 of any other Person in your company. But as you want to restirct the access to just persons which lay within you evalution path B002, you have to maintain tables T77PR and T77UA.
    T77PR: Create a Profile (e.g. name it My Team or something) and add the following values: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/34/49ba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    - Planversion: 01 (most likely)
    - Object Type: O
    - Evalution Patch: <Hint> You cant use B002 directly as B002 just give objects of type O back, but you  need object of type P. Use SBES for instance.
    - Status Vector: 12
    - Depth: 0
    - Function Module: RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT (Gives you the root object where to start the evaluation with path SBES.
    Now you need to assign your users (in your case your managers) to this profile. Use table T77UA to do this.
    Thats it
    regards
    Markus

  • Issue with Evaluation Path

    Hi All,
    I had created one Evaluation Path P-P.
    I want to retrieve all employees who are reporting to a particulat employee...
    ex: A is the manager
    B , C, D are team leads.
    Again B is having 2 more employees.. B1,B2...
    So when we execute for employee A all the B,C,D,B1,B2 need to be displayed. and I created the ZTEST ev path..
    code of EV:
    P B 008 S -> Geeting 'a' position
    S B 005 S  -> getting A' sub-ordinates positions
    S A008 P ->  sub-ordinate positions
    and it is succesfully executed in PPSS..
    i HAVE WRITEN A SAMPLE PROGRAM to test that...
    eX:
    GET OBJEC.
    WRITE: OBJEC-OTYPE , OBJEC-OBJID.
    but system is going infinite loop and giving the following error...
    "\FUNCTION-POOL=RHAS\DATA=STRU_VERK[]"
    Let me know whats wrong here.. and more over issue is person to person retrieve is not possible?
    Regards
    Sas

    Hi.
    What's wrong is this:
    P B 008 S -> Geeting 'a' position
    S A008 P -> sub-ordinate positions
    You are using two opposite links in the same WEGID, so this is what leads to the infinite loop. You should get rid of the first one and always start to evaluate with the current position of the manager.
    S B 005 S -> getting A' sub-ordinates positions
    S A008 P -> sub-ordinate positions

  • Error with Recursive Evaluation Path in PD Profile

    Dear Experts,
    I’m facing an issue using a recursive evaluation path inside a PD profile (transaction OOSP). My scenario is that a Central Person (CP) object is linked by 2 Person (P) objects.  I want the PD profile to give access to 2 Person (P) objects as long as I have access to either 1 of the Person (P) object. I have an evaluation path that is created using transaction OOAW as follows:
    10 P     A 209     * CP
    20 CP       B 209     * P
    The problem that I’m encountering is that the P object goes through a recursive loop during the evaluation path, i.e. the 2 P objects that are evaluated as output gets passed in as inputs again and go into a loop continuously. Is there a way to resolve this recursive issue or other alternative resolution that could meet my requirements? Thanks.

    Use field "Function Module" of table T77PR. You can program what you want yourself. Use function module RH_STRUC_GET to get the CP from the P, and then again RH_STRUC_GET to get the P from the CP. Add the resultings P to the output parameter. Press F1 on the field to see how the FB should look like.

  • Set default directory/path for SaveAs Dialog using WPG_DOCLOAD

    Hi, im trying to set the default directory/path for the SaveAs Dialog called by wpg_docload.download_file.
    I'm not able to find where I can specify the default path.
    Is it something like "htp.p('Content-Disposition: attachment; path=:PX_OUTPUT_DIR" ?
    Thx for your help !
    Here's a part of my code
    owa_util.mime_header( NVL(mime,'application/octet'), FALSE );
    htp.p('Content-length: ' || length);
    htp.p('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="'||substr(fileName,INSTR(fileName,'/')+1)|| '"');
    owa_util.http_header_close;
    wpg_docload.download_file( lobLoc );
    /*********************/

    I don't believe you're allowed to set the directory path in the Content-Disposition (or any other) header. More accurately, you can set path in the filename, but browsers don't pay any attention to that, they only look at only the terminal filename.
    <p>According to RFC 2183, browsers are supposed to ignore any path information sent with the filename. Even though it's dated 1997, I believe this RFC is still in effect.
    <p>This was done as a security precaution against malicious web apps that might try to download into a system directory or other dangerous place. Also, browsers (usually) allow users to specify their own default download directories. Further, even if you could specify the path, you'd have to do it for any and all filesystems (Linux, Mac HFS, Mac OSX, Windows, etc etc).

  • HR - Evaluation Path Issue

    Hi ,
    There is a custom FM which is using  std FM   RH_STRUC_GET_MULTIPLE_ROOTS' to get back hierarchy of organisation .
    A custom evaluation path has been created and is being used - ZX.
    Now RH_STRUC_GET_MULTIPLE_ROOTS' is returning incorrect results. I need to check whether the evaluation path is defined properly. looks like there is an error in definition which might be causing this problem.
    I have no idea how evaluation path works. Could you please let me know the tcode where i could check on the custom evaluation path and rectify the error?
    Thanks in advance

    thanks for the reply.
    I can see the evaluation path in table t778a. In tcode ppss i do not know what the object id and object type for the evaluation path are?
    Any idea if there is any other way to check details?

  • T-code of the window where it asks for evaluation path.

    Hi,
    I want the T-code of that window where it asks for evaluation path. I want to generate the report in OM

    Hi,
    If you are creating repoert through HIS tool, you can use OODS T code to declare the Evaluation path.
    Tomesh

  • Evaluation path to get personnel number all the org unit and subordinates

    Dear all,
    I have OM issue to ask.This is the scenario:
    Staff A  belong to  org 1. Under Org  1, I  have org unit 1-A, 1-B and org unit 1-C.
    Issue 1 :
    I want to run report(RHSTRU00) to  to generate all the staff number in org 1 (Include 1-A, 1-B, and 1-C).
    Issue 2 :
    I  want to run report for 1-A, only staff belongs in org 1-A appear.The others not appear.
    I was understanding I have to play around with evaluation path. Until now I can't find the suitable evaluation_path. I need your help.tq

    Hi,
    Not sure why you want to reinvent the wheel.  The standard report RHXSTRU02 will give you people by Org Unit.  Just enter the Org Unit ID number and you will get the employees as output.
    If you still want to use RHSTRU00, you can use O-P or O-S-P to get the employees and the positions.
    Paul

Maybe you are looking for

  • Implementation of Note 660016 for Follow up Transactions in CRM 2007

    Hi All,    We have a requirement to not show all the business activities and tasks available in crm for all the transactions as follow-ups.    For this reason we implemented the note - 660016. Now its working fine.. It is not showing business acitivi

  • How to open a Word 2003 from a Word 2010 document?

    Hello, I am a transcriptionist and I use a word expander but it only works in Word 2003. I have some documents from a new client who uses Word 2010. When I get the files I need to open them in Word 2003 because I need to type in using my word expande

  • Dd version 8.21 locks up on ctrl+c (SIGINT)

    Hi, in the man pages for dd, it says sending a SIGUSR1 should output I/O statistics and progress.  I also know pressing ctrl+c (SIGINT) used to cancel the job and quit.  Previously I had used both of these with success, now neither of these signals a

  • Aperture 2.1.4 doesn't show up in system updater

    Hi, I ran my system update and did not find 2.1.4 showing up. When I launch aperture, I am running 2.1.3 and haven't installed Snow Leopard yet. Does the update show up only after installing snow leopard? Jeff

  • Transactional replication with 1 publisher 2 subscribers in SQL 2012 SE

    I have a setup of transaction replication between one publisher and subscriber in the Same server.Now, I need to add a new subscriber to the existing publisher. So publisher database name is DB_A and Subscriber 1 name is DB_B. So the new subscriber w