Deleted limit item not transferring to backend PO

Hi,
I have created Shopping cart of service line item and approved, after that i have added limit item and approved the order,
Now i dont want that limit item, i have deleted the limit line item.
the problem is in the SRM PO the value is decresed but in backend it shwing both the prices,
and one more thing is in the backend i can see only one line item having both service item and limit item as in the srm two line items exists,
now the user is asking after deleting the limit item in the SRM in the backend why it is not showing only undeleted price in the Po netprice, as in srm the PO price is as per the required.
Please suggest is this std setting or what to do ..
Regards,
jairaj

Hi
For limit cart you need to create a seperate cart. It will not mix with any other cart.
regards
satish

Similar Messages

  • Free of charge items, ie price = u00A30.00 are not transferred to backend.

    Free of charge items, ie price = £0.00 are not transferred to backend. PO created with held status, but the SRM PO item IR flag is selected. If we manually amend the SRM PO item to remove the 'invoice receipt' flag, then save the PO, the PO does get to the backend with a price of zero, the IR flag de-selected and the 'free' item flag selected.
    How do we manage to get the PO with free items to the backend without having to manually change the held PO in SRM? We are on SRM 5.0 using extended classic.

    Hi
    <b>We have done this type of requirment.. several times.. This is easily possible ..</b>
    <u>You need to Implement the BADI - BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK using SE18 Transaction.</u>
    <b>Either you can do this sample code inside BAPI (Make changes accordingly) or inside the BADI - BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK / BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK_NEW depending on your requirement.</b>
      LOOP AT po_items INTO ls_po_items WHERE net_price IS INITIAL.
    * Reset the IR Indicator for Items with Zero net price
        ls_po_items_add_data-po_item = ls_po_items-po_item.
        ls_po_items_add_data-ir_ind  = space.
        ls_po_items_add_data-gr_ind  = 'X'.
        ls_po_items_add_data-gr_non_val = 'X'.
        APPEND ls_po_items_add_data TO po_items_add_data.
      ENDLOOP.
    <b>Related link -></b>
    Re: Final Entry/ Final Invoice Indicator to be checked Auotmatically
    <u>Do let me know.</u>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Classic scenario-SC not transferred to backend,short dump in ecc

    hi Guru's,
    Classic scenario, sc not transferred to backend, executed FM bbp_pd_sc_resubmit, short dump occurred in the backend stating call function not found
    please help
    short dump file attached
    regards,
    kiran

    Hi Kiran,
    Could you please send the DUMP for analysis.
    Please try to use this -
    This is the new report BBP_SC_AUTO_RETRANSFER to change the status from
    I1111          Item in Transfer Process
    I1112           Error in transfer/ transmission
    Thanks,
    From RBEI,
    Snehal

  • SRM 7.0 - Unconfirmed PO limit items not showing up when creating Invoice

    Hi Guys,
    For PO standard items, when creating an invoice and is unconfirmed, these items still show up in the invoice screen and the invoice gets created with the status 'Waiting for preceding document'. For unconfirmed limit items, these items do not show up at all in the creation of the invoice and displays an error. My question is how will I make the unconfirmed limit items scenario work just like the standard items scenario whereby instead of the unconfirmed limit items not showing up and generating an error, they will show up and have the invoice created with the status 'Waiting for preceding document'?
    Thanks in advance!

    Is this thread still valid? If not, please close the thread.
    If so, as no response has been submitted, please rephrase your question and/or provide further information to describe your requirement.
    Thanks
    Jason
    SDN SRM Moderator Team

  • Deleting Limit Items on PO even though follow on documents exist

    Dear SRM Experts
    I am hoping someone can explain the below behaviour:
    Where PO's have follows on documents i.e. confirmation and /or invoice you cannot delete PO's items on a PO. This makes sense.
    However we also have PO's with Limit items(created via limit type shopping carts) and even though the PO's have been confirmed and invoiced we can still delete the items on the PO. Is this standard behavior or a bug?
    Why then can you not delete normal items but can delete limit type items where follow on documents have been posted for a PO?
    Thanks
    Nishad.

    Hi
    Which SRM version are you using ?
    Incase of Limit Items, it is a bug.
    We have raised a similar issue with SAP some time back and still waiting for SAP to get back on this.
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Deleted line  item not display in Print preview

    Dear All ,
                                    Pl guide that when i delete the line item from a P.O then this deleted item is not visible in Print Preview .pl help what are the exact setting due to which i can know why this del item is not coming in Print Preview.
    Rgds ,
    Rajeev
    Edited by: sap11 on Feb 11, 2009 10:37 AM

    HI,
    Using the standard programm and print form the system works as follows:
    When you will create a new Purchase order with two line item. System
    will create new message record with  Change message flag (NAST-AENDE) as
    space and processing status (NAST-VSTAT) as  0 "not processed".
    After this if you will output the message using ME9F then system will
    update the message processing status NAST-VSTAT as 1 "Successfully
    processed".
    When you will delete line item 10, at that time system will create
    one more message record with indicator Change message flag
    (NAST-AENDE = X ) and processing status 0 "not processed".
    Now system contains two message records in table NAST, one for which
    processing has been done and one change message record for which
    processing has not been done.
    If you will run ME9F with processing status 0 then this means you
    wants to output the change message record means you wants to inform
    your vendor that item 10 has been deleted. That's why system show
    line item 10 but you can notice in print preview, system mentions that
    item 10 has been cancelled.
    If you will run the message with processing status as 1 then this is
    not change message output means system will show you latest print
    of purchasing document and thus will not show line item 10.
    Please take the print out of both message record and you can see the
    difference.
    I hope this information helps!
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • "Create Limit" Item not visible in Shopping Cart for Employee

    Hi Experts,
    The employee user has the following roles in SRM 701 system.
    /SAPSRM/EMPLOYEE
    /SAPSRM/EMPLOYEE_EHP1. The user is not able to see the "Create Limit Item" option in Shopping cart & hence not able to create a limit item in the shopping cart.
    The Purchase user has the following roles in SRM 701 system.
    /SAPSRM/OP_PURCHASER_ADMIN
    /SAPSRM/OP_PURCHASER
    /SAPSRM/OP_PURCHASER_EHP1. This user is able to create Limit Item in the shopping cart using the "Add Item" Menu.
    My requirement is to allow the users of type "Employee" to allow creating the limit items in the shopping cart. Could you please give some guidance on what needs to be done?
    Thank you.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kasee

    Hello Kasee,
    As per the details given by you, you are using a mix of SRM70 and SRM 701 roles for the same user and hence system behavior will not be correct and it will lead to issues.
    I suggest you to try the scenario with user having roles of one release i.e. either assign SRM 70 or SRM 701 roles.
    Also if you are using portal , there also you have to map the user roles accordingly.
    Moreover with SRM 701 we have the Easy Shopping cart delivered to customers where the user can only add items from Catalogs or Free text ones. You will not get different options like provided in the professional or normal shopping cart used in the SRM 70 releases.
    With the /SAPSRM/EMPLOYEE  role ( SRM 70 ) in the abap system and portal, you will get an option to add limit items in the SC's.
    Same applies to the OP purchaser roles. Its not recommended to use /SAPSRM/OP_PURCHASER  & /SAPSRMOP_PURCHASER_EHP1  roles together for one user.
    You can also refer to the note 1476447 SAP SRM 7.0 EHP1 : Important info on New Functionality for more references.
    Hope this will answer your query here.
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Rahul
    Edited by: Rahul Rastogi on Jan 11, 2012 9:53 AM

  • Requirement Tracking Number Not Transferring to Backend

    SRM 5.0 SP 7 - ECS
    We've configured our system to allow users to enter the tracking number withing the Basic Data section of the cart, however when the PO is created in the backend the tracking number details are not transferred.
    I assumed that this would be standard functionality but obvisouly it's not.
    Any ideas / sample code would be gratefully received.
    Keith

    Hi,
    Please check here :
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=5007432&messageID=3851280
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • When you update you iTouch version, and have items not transfered to your computer, do you lose those items when you update it?

    I was going to update my itouch to ios 5 when it said that I had items that were not transfered to my computer.  Does that means that any untransfered items will be lost?

    Yes, unless the items are in your iTunes library.  The backup that iTunes makes does not include items synced to the iPod like, music, video, the apps themselves.

  • Sc not transfered to backend rfc error after bapi_po_create1 ?

    I have one user who's shoppingcarts are not transferred to the backend. when I try to transfer it manually with BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER I get an rfc error after the bapi_po_create1
    for the rest the whole system is functioning as it should but only for this user the shoppingcarts are not transfered. I also don't get any errors back from the bapi.
    anybody got a clue what can be wrong with this particular user ?
    I checked everything in ppoma but can't find any flaws or errors.
    kind regards
    arthur

    >
    Virender Singh wrote:
    > Hi
    > Did you check the Error Log in RZ20. There has to be something wrong in this shopping cart data. Is the SC Approved? What is the error shown by BAPI_PO_CREATE1?
    >
    > Regards
    > Virender Singh
    I am a bit closer to the answer I guess. no there were no erros given with  BAPI_PO_CREATE1
    fuzzy part however with the sc was that there was only an acc_no of 002. since the last hrsps on the backend the   BAPI_PO_CREATE1 gave errors back that it didn't accept 002 without a 001
    so I checked in a badi if there were acc_no with 02 and 100% costassignment and transfered these back to 01
    with the badi BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW. that was working very nice until one user could not transfer any shoppingcart anymore. I saw that she had a workprocedure that caused the 02 acc_no (she used copy paste) when I let her do it without copy paste and just change it then the shoppingcart created a PO.
    but I'm puzzled what I'm missing here and why it most of the times work but sometimes it just doesn't give any errors back and no purchasenr but just an exception others.
    can I debug this further on in the backend somehow what causes the exception ?
    kind regards
    arthur

  • Deleting multiple items not working in Snow Leopard

    I can select multiple events from a repeated event, and when I hit Delete to delete them, iCal correctly pops up a message asking if I'd like to delete only these events, or all future events. I hit "only these events" and it only deletes one item. My event is set up to repeat every week on Monday-Friday.

    Finally got my Konica Minolta Magiccolor to work with Snow Leopard 10.6.1. What I had to do was go to the EU site and I found the Magicolor 2430DL driver that was newer than the one I was using in Leopard. The version you need to get is 1.8.1 and set it up as a HP Jetdirect - Socket and use an IP address that is on the same segment as your computer. Leave the queue name blank. Below is the link I used to find the driver. Select Magicolor 2430DL and it will load a lot of pages. The driver and instructions were on section 201 - 250. It was labeled as working with OS X 10.5 .
    http://download6.konicaminolta.eu/konmin/public/&&BPE&EN&&&&&&0&&&0&&0&&0

  • PO Account Assignment Fund Change is not transferred to backend

    We are on SRM 550 SP10 ECS.
    When a PO is being changed, if the fund is changed, that change does not get transferred to R/3. The old Fund when the PO was created is retained on the R/3 side. On the SRM side the new fund is retained.
    Note:
       The fund that I am talking about is under the Account Assignment link of Item data. If the Cost center is changed the new cost center is reflected to the backend.

    Hi KA!
    Have you found a solution to your problem? We have the same problem and is looking for the FM to get the fund center and commitment item from back end.
    Sincerely
    Anders

  • PO Attachments using Carry Out Sourcing not transferred to Backend

    Hi SDN Team,
    I have an issue with PO Attachments using Carry Out Sourcing.
    The version I am using is SRM 5.0 which is connected to SAP ECC 6.0.
    The necessary configurations for attachments are made in ECC.
    When I create a SC through the normal procedure, with PR and PO getting created, the Attachments are getting transferred to the backend ECC, with the following code in the BADI BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK, method FILL_PO_INTERFACE.
    Code :
      clear cv_attach_use_url.
      cv_attach_transfer_active = 'X'.
      cv_attach_be_doc_type     = 'SRM'.
      cv_attach_be_storage_cat  = 'DMS_C1_ST'.
    But, when I create a SC, then create a PO via Carry Out Sourcing, that is the direct PO without PR getting created, the attachments are not flowing to the backend system.
    1. Now, is there any specific settings which needs to be made for PO Attachments using Carry out sourcing?
    2. I am aware of the BADI "BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW", but even that is not helping me at the moment.
    3. There are no entries created in the table BBP_PDATT too, also no document is created in CV02N tcode in ECC.
    Since I am new to SRM, your valuable suggestions, would be of great help.
    Thanks for your assistance in advance.
    Best Regards,
    Arun.

    Please use program BBP_REQREQ_TRANSFER to create PO in R/3.Let me know you face further problem.
    Sanjay

  • Delete Library items NOT in any playlist?

    Is there any way to delete every file from my iTunes Library which is not used in any current playlist?

    Hey jasontoew,
    Sure!
    (well, with some work)
    What you need is a Smart Playlist
    Create one using File>New Smart Playlist
    Then set selection options to Comment field > contains > In playlist (type it in)
    Make sure live updating is checked
    Next, add comments to multiple items (songs, audiobooks, etc)
    On PC use the control key to select multiple items
    On the Mac, use Apple (a.k.a "Command") key
    Then from the File menu choose "Get Info"
    At the prompt: Are you sure you want to edit information for multiple items? click yes
    Add a comment to the comment field (i.e, same thing you entered while setting up the Smart Playlist)
    You are done. Now click on the smart playlist, it should contain all items with " In playlist" in comments field
    Someone may have created a program that automates this, but, I think this may be helpful to you as a start
    Hope this helps,
    Generik

  • Purchased Items Not Transferred? What's going to happen?

    Hi All,
    I'm getting the error message from iTunes that tells me I have purchased items that have not been transferred from my iPhone. It's preventing me from upgrading iOS. I never purchase music on the phone and all my apps and books are transferred. In fact, everything on my iPhone seems to be in iTunes also. So my question is this:
    What will happen if I update the OS regardless of the error?
    Since everything is indeed transferred, surely I'll notice no change.
    Thanks,
    Dave

    Yeah, I've read through the other postings and tried the manual transfer and I've deauthorised and reauthorised my account. No joy. It seems more like a bug than an actual problem.
    It just annoys me that iTunes identifies a problem but won't elaborate. Thanks, Apple.
    Dave

Maybe you are looking for

  • Call tranasaction with skip first screen in ecc6

    Hi, We are doing upgrade from 4.7 to ecc 6. We are getting an error while running a report( The addition "AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN" can't be used with "CALL TRANSACTION .. USING".  ) in ecc6. This is not showing error in 4.7. Call transaction with skip

  • CME 8 and 3945 router IOS 15.1.1 T

    we are experiencing random phones that unregister with following error in log: 089919: Aug  5 15:31:18 EDT: %IPPHONE-6-UNREGISTER_ABNORMAL: ephone-60:SEP0026CBCXXXX IP:X,X.X.X Socket:168 DeviceType:Phone has unregistered abnormally. we have been chas

  • Java code editor bug

    JDev Team The code editor highlights the string inside split() in red. The message displayed is " String literal contains illegal escape character '.' " String prodID = "10.5.1"; String[] prodLevelId = prodID.split("\\."); Thanks

  • Error creating EO- The specified schema object is not an existng object

    hi, I am getting an error "The specified schema object is not an existing object .Please un check Exisiting Object or select an exisiting object" while creating an EO. Does any one knows how to get rid of it. Thanks, Murlai

  • Platform-independent handling of newlines in captions

    LR 3 should handle newlines in captions in a platform-independent manner. Currently on Windows, captions containing newlines represented by a single newline character ("\n") don't display properly in the Metadata panel, both in the Default and Large