Deleting/Updating Entries of Blocked Invoices

Hi,
The Incoming INvoices were parked because of the Quantity variance and was blocked for Payment.
That particular Invoice got listed in MRBR transaction. We have released the Invoice without deleting the Blocking Reason(Qty Variance). This particular Invoice got paid in the payment run successfully after getting released.
Now when I look at RSEG table I see the Check Mark agains the field SPGRM(Blocking Reason: Qty). 
Pls let me know the ways to update the RSEG table to delete this field entry. We are using this table for our Blocked INvoice Report hence because of this Blocking reason even though the INvoice is Paid, the Invoice is getting listed in the report.
Thanks for all your help.
Regards,
Satya

Please read OSS Note 685688 - Release of "old" invoices as of SAP R/3 Enterprise
maybe you can use one of the reports and hints to solve your issue

Similar Messages

  • Insert delete or update entry in Custom table from KONV entry changed

    Hi All,
    I have custom table ZKONV with only few required columns and should have same number of records as KONV has at any point in time.
    KONV is a cluster table so its not readable from ORACLE level. So ZKONV is created. But I dont know how to keep these both tables in sync.
    I need to perform insert delete or update entry in Custom table if insert delete or update happens on cluster table KONV from any transactions.
    As KONV is a cluster table and does not have changed time stamp I am not able to know the number of records changed in perticulat time period.
    Thanks,

    Thanks for reply,
    There is a Outside SAP system which needs to read KONV data to feed into their system, but as KONV is cluster table they are not able to read it from ORACLE level.
    To solve this we are thinking to create a transparent Z-table and will fill it with KONV and catch Update, delete or Insert statement and do same on ZKONv.
    Is this possible some how? by some database event or something....

  • Deleting Software Update entries?  Part II

    The previous topic has been marked answered - http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11217724&#11217724
    Reason for part II
    I would also like to know how to delete updates that you want to skip because you do not need them. *Can you delete entries?*
    What I want to delete are the *Digital Camera Raw Compatibility* - I do not use Aperture nor have any of the cameras listed.
    *ProKit Update* - I do not have Final Cut Studio, Final Cut Pro, Motion, Soundtrack Pro, DVD Studio Pro, Aperture, Final Cut Express, Soundtrack, Logic Pro and Logic Express installed on my computer.

    Sorry to bother. I just figured it out.
    Select the item then go to Update/Ignore Update.

  • AFPO table deletion Flag entry update

    Hi ,
    i have one small Question ,
    When the deletion flag entry XLOEK  in the AFPO table is getting updated ? the filed is  XLOEK  ....
    I have tried  with deletion flag activation , teco the order , closed the order & Teco & close , delevery complited the ststus but the entry in the AFPO table is not getting updated .
    Piyush

    Dear
    I was checking the sandbox .It is not appearing in AFPO table even set into PO.Did you check in AFKO ??
    Refer the this useful thread which may answer your question : Re: Production order in deletion status
    Regards
    JH

  • Parked and Blocked Invoice

    Hi Gurus,
    What is the difference between parked and blocked invoice? Under what situations we go for parked invoices and under what situations for blocked invoices? When there is a quantity and price variance, invoice gets blocked. Can we go for parked invoice in case of quantity and price variance? A detailed explaination will be really helpful.
    Thanks,
    Kumar

    HI,
    Parked Invoices
    You can park invoices or credit memos. This means that you enter the invoice data or credit memo data in the system and save it in a document, but the system does not post this invoice initially.
    You can change a parked document as often as you wish, for example, by adding or correcting data. The changes are logged. When you have finished changing the document, you can post the parked document. Only when you post an invoice or credit memo, does the system carry out the normal account movements and make the necessary updates.
    To park a document, choose Logistics Invoice Verification -- Document Entry -- Park Invoice
    Blocked Invoices
    You can block an invoice manually. You have two options for doing this when you enter the invoice:
    You can block an invoice by entering an R in the field Payment block in the document header data.
    You can block an item by selecting the Ma (manual blocking reason) field in the item list. When you post the invoice, the system automatically sets an R in the field Payment block in the vendor line of the accounting document. Manually blocked items are given the blocking reason Manual block (M).
    Logistics Invoice Verification -- Further processing -- Release invoices
    Specify the Selection of blocked invoices
    Select the type of Processing
    Select a Blocking procedure
    Exceute
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kiran

  • Report of blocked invoices

    Hello,
    Is there any standard report where the blocked invoices are displayed?
    I mean here invoices not only from MM modules but from FI module as well.
    Many thanks for any suggestions,
    Miroslav

    Hello Miroslav,
    Use Transaction MR02 (up to Release 4.6B) or MRBR (as of Release 4.6C)
    to display the invoices that are blocked for payment.
    Please check also note 333930 for explanation of other cases.
    There is no update from FB02 into RBKP-ZLSPR or RBKP_BLOCKED, it means
    that if you block or unblock FI document in FB02 the data on MM side
    are not changed.
    In other words, if you have set the payment block in FB02 then system will not display those invoice in MRBR. Reason is if an invoice is blocked in FB02, it will have to be released on the FI side and there is no requirement to release it through MRBR. This is the standard behavior. Please refer the following notes also.
    394370   FAQ: Invoice release - frequently asked questions
    377306   MIRO/MRBR: System behavior in the case of invoice
    I hope it helps you
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa Barth.

  • Display  Purchase order, PO Item , Order Number ,entry sheet quantity ,entry sheet price ,invoice quantity, invoice price  against each line number

    hello all,
    i have an ALV report requirement like this,
    on the initial screen i have displayed(for a given agreement number like in ME33K )
    in the selection screen i have taken agreement number as EKPO-EBELN.
    purchase document number        item number        short text        target quantity      net price
    5400000019                                  1                      xxx                  1.000                  304300.00
                                                        2                     xxxx                 1.000                  500000.00
    the above fields i have taken from EKPO table.....
    and on double clicking the  item number i have displayed
    line number          service number       short text           quantity    units    gross price   quantity released
    1                           swr10                   xxxx                 2.00          kg          500             2
    2                           swr11                    xxxx                5.00          EA         500             2
    the above fields i have taken from ESLL (esll-extrow, esll-srvpos, esll-ktext1 , esll-menge  etc......)
    this i have done by passing EBELN to ESLH and getting PACKNO and passed this PACKNO to ESLL.
    now my question is i need to display  Purchase order, PO Item , Order Number ,entry sheet quantity ,entry sheet price ,invoice quantity, invoice price
    against each line number above.....
    from which table do i need to take these fields.....
    please guide me....
    thankq....

    Thanks Andra,
    The problem is the multiple invoices is for non goods receipt item so there will be no delivery.At the time of creating a PO the GR is not checked so there will be no delivery .
    Also this setting is for invoices which are comming from Vendors.But if we are genrating the invoices manually it is not blocking those invoices.Also i there is nowhere mentioned in Incomming invoice to set tolerence for incomming invoice.Are you talking about Vendor tolerences?
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: Metroid01 on May 14, 2009 6:52 PM

  • Block with more than one table type agurment -  Update Procedure for Block

    Hi,
    I have one form with 3 Block. First Block is single row block, and other 2 are details block . The details balocks are based on the Procedure datasource, because of the complex query conditions. Now my requirement is When Inserting / Updating the Master Block (Single Row Block), I need to get the values in the two details block , because I need to update some other tables also based on these values. I created a procedure with two Table Type parameters (for each details block) , but when I using this procedure as the Update Procedure Name in the block, I am getting the error Only One table type arguement is allowed. Is there any other method to implement this.
    Thanks in advance.

    Rizly,
    A quick summary to make sure I understand your requirements. You have a single row base table master block with two detail blocks that are based on Procedures. When you update the single row base table master block, you need all of the data in the two procedure based detail blocks as there are updates that you have to perform to other tables that use this data. You have created a stored procedure that take two PL/SQL tables as parameters, but you are getting the error that only 1 table parameter is allowed.
    I need to ask you a few questions first. What is your Forms version? The stored procedure you created; are you using this procedure in the "On-Insert, On-Update, On-Delete" triggers or do you call the procedure in one of the Base Table block ("Key-Commit, When-Button-Pressed" or other trigger)? When you modify or add a new Master block record are you adding values to the detail blocks or using values from the previous Master block record?
    If you are using your procedure in the On-Insert, On-Update or On-Delete trigger(s), then based on your description, the error you are receiving is correct. The "On-..." triggers are constrained in that their procedures expect only a single PL/SQL table, Table of Records or Ref Cursor as a parameter. This is a Forms constraint - not a PL/SQL constraint as Forms is expecting you to only perform actions on the block where the "On-..." Trigger is located.
    Perhaps you should consider creating a database Package that has two package specification constructs (Ref Cursor, Table of Records, etc) you can populate from Forms and then simply call the package procedure that will use the Ref Cursors to perform the needed update or inserts.
    Hope this helps.
    Craig...
    If mine or someone elses response was helpful, please mark it accordingly

  • Block invoices for PO with no GR-based IV flag

    Hello SAP experts,
    I need your help with finding a way to block invoices for PO with no GR-based IV flag.  At our company, we treat service POs almost the same as material POs (to avoid receipt of service entry).  The only difference from material PO is that service PO does not have the flag for GR.  We customized our EBP to have this done.
    Now, accounting wants to automatically block all invoices associate with service POs.  In this case it would be a PO with no GR.  I tried LIV configuration but it is only for price, quantity and etc.  I also tried blocking with IR before GR but it didn't work because there is no GR.
    Is there a way to achive automatic invoice block in this case?
    Appreciate your help.
    -AT-

    Hi Annie,
    if the configuration doesn't help you enough, you would have to add some custom logic after the invoice has been created.
    Technically speaking, I believe there exists a business add-in (BAdI) where you could enter a piece of code which would after the invoice creation check the GR and block it if appropriate. Another implementation option would be a mini-workflow - there you would have a step which checks the GR existence and blocks the invoice.
    Hope this helps, I suggest talking to your local abap consultant for more details,
    -Mikko

  • Blocked Invoice Change Report

    Howdy SAP GURUS...
    I am looking for a way to determine who (i.e. the user) that has deleted the blocking reason on the blocked invoice report (MRBR).
    We would like authorised users in the business to be able to delete valid blocking reasons (i.e. price variance above tolerance) for blocked invoices. But we cannot find a report that display "who" has actually deleted the blocking reason.
    What is your thoughts on dealing with suched blocked invoices?
    Does a report exist for changes to this table?

    Hi,
    Check with t.code: S_ALR_87012293
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Price variance workflow for blocked invoices in MM purchasing

    Hi Gurus,
    We are implementing price variance workflow for blocked invoices. We built a custom workflow to
    take care of the routing requirement of the customer.
    We also did necessary customization defining the tolerance limits for price variance. Before testing the workflow wanted to check events in SWEL and its is found that system doesn't raise any event for price/ quantity block and hence the workflow is not triggered at all.
    Event trace active flag is set in SWELS. I am not able to figure out what we are missing.The invoice gets created correctly with the price/quantity blocks and blocked invoices are available when we see in Tcode 'MRBR'.
    Any suggestion will be highly appreciated.
    Edited by: srinivas bejjanki on Jan 29, 2009 10:34 PM

    Hello,
    So you are absolutely sure the event trace is on. If you try SWUE with some other event, you see the entry in SWEL, dated a few minutes ago, correct?
    When you try SWUE with BUS2081.BlockedPrice does it give any message?
    Does SWUE work with any other BUS2081 event?
    regards
    Rick Bakker
    Hanabi Technology

  • SERVICE ENTRY SHEET AND INVOICE

    hi experts
      how service entry sheet related to invoice and will affect financial entries, can any body clear cycle of service entry sheet to invoice and payment.
    i try to invoice(f-43)  with services  i am unable to invoicing services is it possible to entry invoice of services.
    raju

    Hi,
    A service entry sheet accounting postings are similar to GR for account assigned PO.when you  do the service entry sheet the account assigned object account and GR/IR account are updated.
    When Invoice is verified then vendor account and GR/IR account are uipdated.
    Regards,
    Rambhupal reddy

  • Deleting duplicate entries

    I have two tables (Accounts, and Accounts_LOAD). The _Load table is a daily feed.
    For my first step, I need to delete all the duplicates from _Load that exist in Accounts. 
    How can I delete duplicate entries which exist in two tables..?

    I think that the Merge will suffice. My apologies.
    But, now (again, sorry) I have a couple questions on the merge.
    Below is similar to what I would use and a few Q's on it....
    line4: can u use multiple "on" ?
    line5:For 'when matched' i only want to update fields from "_load" to "Accounts" that need to be updated. If they are the same, they would be ignored... is that possible...?
    1 MERGE INTO accounts acc
    2 USING (SELECT **ALLFIELDS**
    3 WHERE SOMESTUFF=STUFFS) STF
    4 ON (ACC.ID_USER = STF.ID_USER) AND (ACC.SYSTEM_ID = STF.SYSTEM_ID)
    5 WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET acc.bonus = D.bonus + S.salary*.01
    6 DELETE WHERE (S.salary > 8000)
    7 WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT (D.employee_id, D.bonus)
    8 VALUES (S.employee_id, S.salary*0.1)
    9 WHERE (S.salary <= 8000);

  • Urgent!!! : To delete table entries in COKA,COSP,COSB  from FY2010

    Problem:
    <b>Business needs to limit the validity of certain cost elements to 31st
    March 2007. But not able to do the same due to updation of Tables
    COKA,COSP and their dependent Tables.</b>
    Reason:
    The business is currently in fiscal year 2007.Some tables were updated
    till fiscal year 2010 due to future date(Example March 20th 2009)
    mentioned in scheduling in Production Order/Process Order.
    In certain Production Orders/Process Orders, scheduling date was
    erroneously updated referring future fiscal years up to FY2010.
    This has caused the updation of CO tables COKA ,COSP and their
    dependent tables COKP, COKS,COSS,COKL,COEJ,COBK,COEP,COVP.
    Even if we revert the scheduling dates back to current year in the
    Process Order/production order, the table information is present in the
    future fiscal years which prevents deletion of cost elements for the
    future period.
    Steps for the Reconstruction
    <b>Solution required:
    We need to know the systematic procedure/program/process through which
    we can delete the entries in main tables COKA, COSP and the dependent
    tables (COKP, COKS, COSS, COKL, COEJ, COBK, COEP, and COVP.)without
    affecting the integrity of information present in the production
    order/Process Order for the current period.
    Ultimately we should be in a postion to restrict the validity period of
    cost elements to 31st March 2007.</b>

    Hi,
    I am not sure, whether this will help you or not.  I think you can archive the data in the first stage.
    Then try to work on the validity periods.
    Rgds,

  • Simply delete all entries in a database.

    Hello,
    how do I simply delete all entries in a database (which must be thread safe, and most probably is)? For instance it is needed, as I'm developing a versioned open source XML/JSON database system, whereas I'm using a BerkeleyDB environment/database as a transaction log per revision (resource/log/version_number/...) for dirty blocks/pages and now want to introduce checkpointing (with currently only a single write-transaction per resource). That is another reading transaction (possibly another thread might read a transaction log, a BerkeleyDB environment/database while another thread, the checkpointer (most probably a deamon thread) commits, that is writes the log periodically or during less workload into the real resource. After the data is commited, the transaction-log must be emptied, but probably a reading transaction still reads from the log and falls back to reading from the real resource if the page is not in the log. That is I can't remove the database, but probably simply have to delete all entries and a simple .commit-file flag which indicates if the data has been written back to the real resource or the checkpointer must be writing it back sometime in the future (if the .commit-file still exists). Do I have to iterate through the database with a cursor (and .getNext())? Or does a dedicated method exist?
    kind regards
    Johannes

    Hi Johannes,
    As I think you've already discovered, there is no built-in method for deleting all records of a database that is open. The only similar built-in methods are those for removing or truncating an entire database (removeDatabase and truncateDatabase), and the database must be closed.
    If you can't find a way to use removeDatabase or truncateDatabase, then you'll have to iterate through the records and delete them individually. If this is done for a large numbers of records in a single transaction, it will be expensive on a number of fronts, including memory usage for the locks: each record is individually locked.
    If you don't need to delete all records in a single transaction (I couldn't completely understand your use case), then you can iterate with a cursor using READ_UNCOMMITTED and delete the records in individual transactions using Database.delete. This avoids using lots of memory for the locks, since only one record is locked at a time.
    In either case the cost can be reduced by using DatabaseEntry.setPartial(0, 0, true) for the DatabaseEntry that is passed as the data parameter. You only need the key to delete the record, not the data, and avoiding a fetch of the data is a big cost savings (if the record data is not in cache). This optimization is only in JE 5.0 and above --in JE 4.1 and earlier, this has no advantage because the data is always fetched internally, as part of the deletion operation.
    --mark                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Maybe you are looking for

  • Resultset closing - technicality

    "..... I declared Statement objects as class variables. You probably are doing the same. Doing this, you can't close the statements inside a method. (don't ask me why!!) My solution was to declare those Statement objects inside the method where I exe

  • Placing customized artwork on mp3 file?

    I would like to add our school logo or customized artwork to our mp3 recordings. Is there an easy way to do this? It seems like the "tag and rename" option is all about finding album art and attaching it to a song, which is not exactly what I want to

  • Invalid Flow Context error in Inbound Queues

    I am new to CRM middleware. We are getting lot of entries in CRM Inbound Queue (SMQ2) in our production system with error description, "Invalid Flow Context". The queues are of type, "R3AD_CONNOBJXXXXXXXXXX" and the FM the error was caused in, is "BA

  • Write protected flash drives

    I have a macbook pro with OS Lion.  I have 3 usb flashdrives and all of them have suddenly become write protected. There is no switch on the stick.  I believe the problem started after I bootcamped my computer and began running windows 7.  I was tryi

  • My podcast won't appear on the Podcast app. Why?

    My podcast can be found via iTunes and via browser, but it suddenly stopped appearing altogether on the Podcast app. In comparions to a previous version I have of the feed, everything seems in order. What on earth could have happened to the feed that