Depreciation error :There are no areas to post to in company code SN00

Hi,
When I am running depreciation (AFAB) for a main asset for a particular period, I am getting an error as "There are no areas to post to in company code SN00".
On further checking, the solution seems given is as follows" Using the Customizing functions, check whether the areas to be posted have been given a posting cycle in the company code specified."
Could not understand what does that mean.
Any inputs will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance,
Dusmanta

Hi,
You have to define how depreciation area post to general ledger.
For this in SPRO, in Asset Accounting go to 'Integration with the General Ledger' and in to
'How Depreciation Area post to General Ledger'.
For your dereciation area, check whether 'Area Posts in Realtime' is selected.
regards,
Priya Rajesh.

Similar Messages

There are no areas to post to in company code 0637

Hi Friends,
I have done Asset Config, created the asset and posted dep for period 01/2010
When am running AFAB for period 02/2010 the system through an error message as below
*There are no areas to post to in company code 0637*
Can anyone do suggest.
Highly appreciate for the quick response.
Regards,
Srinivas Muthyala

Hello Srinivas ,
Which selection parameters do you run AFAB with ?
Can you check in your system whether AA690 may be justified?
For example:
If you run a repeat execution of depreciation for period 12 in Fiscal
Year 2008.
However, there is no entry in TABA for Fiscal Year 2008. Therefore
you need to run AFAB in "planned posting run" not in "repeat run".
Please note that you have to run first planned depreciation for your
period xx before you might try to to a repeat run.
Can you check TABA and see which one is the next period you should
post to? Then start a planned depreciation run for that period.
regards
Ray

Posting only posisble error in periods 2009/08 and 2009/07 in company code

Hi Experts,
When my user do GI for this month he got error as mentioned below,
Posting only possible error in periods 2009/08 and 2009/07 in company code
Already i have done it but still am not confident.
Also this particular corrections i need to do it in Production system
Please guide which month i need to enter 1st in MMPV,request you to explain step by step.
Cheers,
Kumar.S

Hi,
Check in T.code: MMRV and see which period is open for ur Co.Code and back posting is allowed or not.
In MMPV open period 09 with your company code.
Note-1: Check Fiscal Period Variant in OBY6..........is it K4.
Note-2: From FI side check or Now use t.code: OB52 and open the 09, 2009 period in Account Types A, K, D,M, S and specially Account Type u201C+u201D which stands for valid for all accounts type and save. Better consult FICO consultant for OB52 step.
Regards,
Biju K

Can a personnel area be assigned to more than one company code?

Hi experts,
Can a personnel area be assigned to more than one company code?
Regards,
Anita George

Yes, as Siva said it is not possible.
Between personnel area and company code -
many to one mapping is allowed but one to many is not allowed. That is you can map more than one PA to 1 company code but 1 PA can not be map to more than one company code.

Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

Hello Guys,
I have a problem related to cross company code transaction.
In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
Can anyone help on this?
Thanks
Rafael B.

Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
The document was created in 2010.
This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
More suggestions?
Regards.
Rafael

KB21N -Is there a way to prevent activity allocation between Company Codes?

Hi people,
How can we prevent user from posting to another Company Code through KB21N (Direct Activity Allocation)?
Note that everything is under one Controlling Area.
thank you
Maut

yes, create a CO Validation (OKC7) with the following rules:
Prerequiesite:
COBL_SENDER-BUKRS <> COBL_RECEIVER-BUKRS
Check:
COBL_SENDER-BUKRS = COBL_RECEIVER-BUKRS
also you need to create a proper message in case of Error, like:
"no cross company postings in CO allowed"
hope this helps - I just defined this and tested - it works....
regards
Bjoern
Edited by: Bjoern Hansen on Apr 9, 2010 10:46 AM

Posting from one company code to another company code

Hi all,
For functional reasons in SAP FS CD (insurance) we had to split up an administration in several company codes. Is it possible to post all GL transactions in FiCo from the insurance company codes to the target company code automatiucally every day or week?
I haven't been able to find a transaction yet. I'm looking for something like the way "distibution" or "assessment" are used in CO but then for posting from one company code to another on the same GL accounts (both CC's use the same chart of accounts).
Thanx for the help in advance!
Arnoud Bom

Dear Arnoud,
You can do it by substitution rules - GGB4 or EDI / IDOCs.
Look at discussion bellow. I hope it helps.
Automatic Posting Between 2 companies in the same system
Regards

Posting to incorrect company code

hello sir,
For the service order 17044218, billing is for company code DK10 , however the posting is happening in a different company code ES10.
Could you please suggest how to resolve.
Best Regards
Meghna Bhargava

Dear
you will have to reverse the wrongly accounted company code and enter a fresh posting to correct company code.
Regards,
Chintan joshi

Error in F110 posting telling that company code does not appear in proposal

Hi Everyone,
During the aotumatic payment run via F110, after creating the proposals when i am trying to display the proposal, it is giving an error message that " Company Code XY12 / XY12 does not appearin proposal 08.07.2011 AB00; correct "
But I already set company code XY12 , in the company code in the parameter tab. I ahve also set there payment methods and next payment date. Please help.

Hi Dear,
Chk these links
http://sap-f2.blogspot.com/2009/06/fz003-company-codes-do-not-appear-in.html
Company codes 0001/0001 do not appear in proposal 20.11.2009 A#04; correct
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=188134

Error in ASKB "Asset 1-177 0 not in company code LX01'

Hi Experts,
Until Jan. 2009, only 1 depreciation area is activated for company code LX01 (01). For some assets, we had retirements/write-up postings. Came Feb. 2009, dep.area 10 was activated.
With 2009 year-end closing AJAB, the process found an error ' Transactions not periodically posted'. This error upon analysing was due to those assets posted with retirements/write-ups (Jan. 09) and mentioned that ASKB needs to be executed for these assets for deparea 10. It's logical that there are no postings on these new accounts for January and the system should not ask them. For example there also are no depreciation postings in area 10 for January and this does not generate any problem. Then, why in ERP, the ASKB for deparea 10 is needed for those related assets?
Also, I tried to process ASKB for deparea 10 to complete, but another error prompted: Message AA001 'Asset 1-177 0 not in company code LX01'. With this error message, I changed the 'Deactivation on' field in the masterdata and tried to rerun ASKB, but still this error exists. Would you know why or how this error could be eliminated?
Kindly help.
Thanks in advance.
jandaph

Hi,
According to the error message, it seems like The asset does not exist in your company code.
Please check again.
Thanks,
Srinu

Posting time across company codes

I have a question around timesheets accross different company codes. My example is:
Company A wins the work with the external customer, who they will invoice and recognise the revenue for using RA. They are unable to complete the work so purchase the service of an employee within Company B. Normally this would mean raising a PO from Company A to Company B. The employee (who has a HR record within company B), then raises a Project & SO within company B and posts his time to it. He then invocies Company A.
It would be very easy just to then service receipt the PO in company A, and post the invocie from company B. However we want to be able to action this via timesheets. The only solution we can come up with is to have the employee in company B to also have an external HR record in company A. This will then allow him to also enter time in the Company A project, and using CATM create the SES on the PO.
However this means the employee is keying in 2 timesheet records. We can eliminate the records by the employee number range, but sometimes an entry could be missed.
So how do others cross book accross company codes with timesheets. Bear in mind Company A wants to recognise all the Revenue for their project, and company B will also want to see the time postings in their company code.
Any ideas?

Okay, clear on your comment, and appreciate that.This comment fascinates me though, "In the scenario the project will consist of top level WBS billing element linked to sales order with customer and then another WBS belonging to the supplying company code in the lower hierarchy linked to sales order to the internal customer". In order to get RRICB to be read correctly in DP93 taking into consideration proper set up of DIP profile, etc. you need to have account assignment "E' in play. This prevents the use of a WBS on the contract and subsequently the sales order. Your suggested model is very different from what SAP documentation suggests for ECC 6.0. Again, not questioning you, just interested to know more as I have spent a lot of time recently modeling things in our sandbox environment, and have poured over the documentation many times.
My conclusion at this point is RRICB works, and works well. BUT, there are limitations in terms of how things are accounted for at the end of the day. If the gap between the business requirement and the system standard doesn't cut it, not much you can do - really the essence of OSS NOTE 1341136.
I am equally confused at item 6 (SAP documentation, not me). Further confusion in the fact you are suggesting the creation of a WBS at lower level, and SAP documentation suggesting there is no need for a project in this relationship. I have the suggested model in the link I posted previously working in our sandbox environment and admittedly I like what I see, just running into issues as the level of accounting that plays out in the scenario doesn't meet our the business requirement.
We spent a lot of time trying to resolve our profit center dilemma via EXIT_SAPLV46H_001, but couldn't get it to take. Our code was successful in deriving what we were looking for, but seemed to get trumped later on in the process.
Useful notes on the collective process I found ...
352261      VA01: Error message KI100
815972      PCA substitution for cross-company-code sale
916973      Part PCtr incorr in interco bill before ext billing
1410850    DP93: Service order on selection screen leads to VPK1 310
1341136    RRICB, classic FI, new G/L, CO and PCA
643838      Billing between company codes: Expense Reports and so on.
Any further insights are welcomed.
Thanks again,
Jason

Error when i am assigning chart of dep to company code

Hi all,
when i am assigning chart of depreaction to company code it was geving the following error.
NOTE: i copied chart of dep form USA and names as 999 and my company code is 1234
Inconsistency between FI company code 1234 and chart of deprec. 999
Message no. AC481
Diagnosis
You tried to assign chart of depreciation 999 to company code 1234. According to its Customizing definition, this company code manages parallel currencies.
The chart of depreciation does not contain a corresponding depreciation area for each of the currency types that are defined in the company code.
System Response
This assignment is not possible.
Procedure
1. Check the currency types of the company code.
2. Specify a corresponding depreciation area for each currency type.
could you please give me solucion to me please.
thanku

please define the additional currency of ur company code as per following setting. as you copied the chart of deperciation
1-OAYH Define depreciation areas for foreign currencies
2- OABT Specify the use of parallel currencies

Goods Issue posting in multiple company codes

Hello All,
While the sales order is PGI'd , there are multiple accounting documents generated. One for the sales under selling organizations company code X and another one posts a COGS under a different company code Y(Posts as Intercompany Accoounting document as it X has received from Y) which is wrong. We have 2 sales orders of different plants but with same company code , the first plant is working fine and is posting as expected , but the second one is posting multiple accounting documents to 2 company codes . We have checked all the configuration and everything looks good , we have raised a VH OSS to SAP and they are looking into it. Just wanted to get your views on taking this forward. Movement type is 601.
Your inputs are highly appreciated.
Thanks

While the sales order is PGI'd , there are multiple accounting documents generated
Can you please share the screen shot of document flow from sale order? As you would be aware, in normal circumstances, once a delivery is posted for goods issue, following would be an accounting entry.
COGS Dr
FG Inventory Cr
G. Lakshmipathi

Payroll Posting to multiple Company Codes in FI and CO possible?

Dear experts,
I need your help on the following challenging issue with respect to payroll posting to accounting.
Is it possible for a payroll that runs in one company code for all employees, to post to FI and CO for multiple CoCds?
Example:
WT 1234 exists in HR CoCd 1000 (assume an amount of u20AC 100 in the payroll results)
G/L ABC exists in FI CoCd 1000
G/L DEF exists in FI CoCd 2000
CCtr xyz exists in CO CoCd 1000 (which is the employee's master cost centre)
CCtr uvw exists in CO CoCd 2000
The wage type should be mapped as follows:
+ 100 to G/L ABC and CCtr xyz (this is no problem, is realized with standard mapping)
- 100 to G/L DEF and CCtr uvw
The challenge is in the fact that the credit amount should go to another company code than the debit amount.
How can I realize this?
Thanks in advance for your feedback!
Jeroen

This is from SAP documentation:
Cross-company code transactions are characterized by the fact that payables are assigned to a company code other than the one in which the corresponding expenses arose. This results in receivables and payables between company codes.
If you want to post these receivables and payables to company code clearing accounts, you must make the settings in several steps, as outlined in the following.
Note that in the case of separate HR/AC systems, posting to company code clearing accounts can only be implemented if the AC system is in Release 4.5A or higher.
For more information on cross-company code transactions and business considerations, refer to the SAP Library under Payroll -> country -> Subsequent Activities -> Posting to Accounting -> Special Business Requirements for Posting -> Cross-Company Code Transactions.
Settings for Posting to Company Code Clearing Accounts
1. In the step Define Symbolic Accounts, you must assign an account determination type to each symbolic account in Human Resources. For specific postings to balance sheet accounts, the account assign types FL and FO are used. From a technical viewpoint, these account assignments are defined as follows:
Wage types that are assigned to a symbolic account with account assignment type FL are posted in accordance with the information from the last period in the WPBP table (Work Center Basic Pay) for the current original result.
Wage types that are assigned to a symbolic account with account assignment type FO are only used for posting in the evaluation of a current original result.
2. In the step Define Posting Characteristics of Wage Types, you must assign the symbolic accounts with the account assignment types FL and FO to the corresponding wage types:
You assign the symbolic accounts with account assignment type FL to wage types that, in the case of retroactive accounting, contain the difference between old and new payment amounts. In countries that use the principle of origin, this usually involves wage types /551 Recalculation difference and /552 Subsequent clearing from previous month.
You assign symbolic accounts with the account assignment type FO to wage types that contain payments to employees and whose amounts do not change in the case of retroactive accounting. This usually involves wage types /557 Cash payment, /558 Payment of balance, /559 Transfer and other, country-specific wage types.
3. In the step Create Posting Variants, you must set the Post to company-code clearing account indicator for the variants that you use. Otherwise, payables and receivables between company codes are not posted to company code clearing accounts, and remain as the balance on the document split account for the company codes affected.

Different currency posted to a Company Code

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have a issue, where the documents are posted with different currency.
Issue: Program(RFKK_MA_SCHEDULER) has run and posted few documents in different currency then the original.
For my company code 1234 and GL Acct XXX(Post automatically) the assigned currency is USD but when job has run i found the documents are posted to MXN currency.
I have checked in Group currency and hard currency it's in USD only, even in the GL master also it is USD only.
Please provide me your inpust resolving this issue and let me know incase you require any more details.
Thanks
Sree

Hi Sree,
What is your company code Currency? USD or MXN?
Regards,
Ahemmed

Depreciation error :There are no areas to post to in company code SN00

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for