Depreciation planned but not posted.
Hi all,
There is the following case.
In asset explorer there is planned depreciation which is not posted for prior year. I want to erase this planned depreciation (is incorrect) in prior year without affecting G/L. Could you please advise?
If this is to be made with ABSO and specific transaction type, could you please tell me setup of the transaction type?
Best Regards,
Kyriakos
Dear Kyriakos,
is this prior year closed in FI-AA already? If so, how were you able to close this fiscal year? This should be found as error by the fiscal year close report.
If the prior fiscal year is not closed, then you can either change the depreciation key to a non-calculating one (e.g. 0000) or set a shutdown indicator for the complete fiscal year. This should reduce the planned depreciation to zero. No posting or G/L entry is necessary therefor.
If the prior fiscal year should be already closed in FI-AA (still I would be wondering how you did that), you could use the solution provided in [SAP Note 29694|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/29694].
Hope this helps,
Markus
Similar Messages
-
Manual depreciation and Planned but not posted depreciation forwarded
HI Expert,
We would like to request for Product Enhancement for Fixed Asset Module due to the inconsistency in the computation for the following:
u2022 The planned and un-posted depreciation is already considered as confirm transaction when they compute for the accumulated depreciation to be forwarded next year (as well as net book value beg for next year)
u2022 But as for the no of months (remaining life) u2013 it will only consider the no of posted months when they compute for remaining life of the asset
The current feature of SAP affecting our enhancement request is as follows
1) Manual depreciation is currently validates manual depreciation based on Planned depreciation instead of Posted depreciation
2) Remaining life computation for next year depreciation is based on posted transaction only
3) When user wants to fully depreciate the asset, we cannot post depreciation based on remaining un-posted depreciation using manual depreciation
Based on this feature we want to request for the following enhancement
1) For the remaining un-posted depreciation (especially if the previous year is already close), we should be able to choose which month we want to post the un-posted depreciation
2) Since the remaining life computation is based on posted depreciation only, 1) the validation and 2) the net book value forwarded next year should also be based on posted depreciation
We have a sample computation based on current feature VS the suggested computation for SAP. Is there any way for us to import the file here at the forum? We will wait for your advice
Regards,
AmyDear Kyriakos,
is this prior year closed in FI-AA already? If so, how were you able to close this fiscal year? This should be found as error by the fiscal year close report.
If the prior fiscal year is not closed, then you can either change the depreciation key to a non-calculating one (e.g. 0000) or set a shutdown indicator for the complete fiscal year. This should reduce the planned depreciation to zero. No posting or G/L entry is necessary therefor.
If the prior fiscal year should be already closed in FI-AA (still I would be wondering how you did that), you could use the solution provided in [SAP Note 29694|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/29694].
Hope this helps,
Markus -
What is the Impact of just parking invoice doc's, but not posting...
I would like to know the risk/constrain involved with the below process, which may not be a standard practice.
1. Service Provider maintains Classic SRM/ECC. Customer maintains own ECC.
2. Shopping cart created in SRM and PO generated in ECC of Service provider.
3. PO transferred to Customer ECC. Invoice posting, Payment and FI activities are carried out in customer ECC.
4. Basic Invoice Information is transferred back to Service provider ECC, so this invoice will be shown as follow on document in the shopping cart. It will show only the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose. There is neither finance activity nor any reporting are made out that system.
Service provider just want to Park the document and not to post it, so it won't hit the GL account. This eliminates considerable work FI configuration settings.
Question is whether this unorthodox method of just parking, but not posting will cause any impact/risk, even though no FI activities is carried on that system.Hi,
'the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose' and 'In future if we are planning to use any reporting from service provider', in this case of cause there will be a problem.
But, what Service provider going to do with Parked doc? In future if they're going to post it?I mean if they are have accounts payable why they don't post it? -
Excise Invoices Captured but not posted.
Hi,
How can I see the list of all excise invoices that are captured but not posted. Also list of excise invoices that are cancelled.
Regards
AyyallasHi Ayyallas,
Have you tried transaction J2IUN and using the button "Display pending invoice".
You might also be able to see this in table J_1IEXCHDR with field STATUS.
Hope this helps,
Adam. -
Sap treasury flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted
Hi,
I run TBB1 - posted business transactions - all transactions posted
when i run the tbb4 for product type 51a i got the following error
sap treasury flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted
Please see the imageHello, Krishna.
You haven't posted flow types 1150.
Please go to your transaction, select "Cash flow" tab, Choose layout "106 Posting view", select flow type 1150 (one from your first screenshot above - use flow type and date) and check "Posting status" field - what's inside (please, provide screenshot)?
NA T2104
Short Text
Flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted
Diagnosis
The corresponding flow is due before the accrual/deferral key date, but has not yet been posted; this may result in the incorrect amount of expenses or revenues being displayed in financial accounting.
System Response
The flow is treated by the accrual/deferral function as if were already posted, i.e. the related expenses or revenues are accrued/deferred, where appropriate.
Procedure
Post the flow to correct the amounts of expenses or revenues shown in financial accounting. -
Is there any T-code or standard report which can find the list of transaction which are settled, but not posted?
I tried TPM20, but only those were posted is listedplease check if you selected only relevant area (-s) for you, e.g. if you need a list of contracts settled but not posted, then mark 'issue no messages' in all non-relevant areas, like in a screenshot attached.
/Renatas -
Impact of just parking invoice doc, but not posting???
I would like to know the risk/constrain involved with the below process, which may not be a standard practice.
1. Service Provider maintains Classic SRM/ECC. Customer maintains own ECC.
2. Shopping cart created in SRM and PO generated in ECC of Service provider.
3. PO transferred to Customer ECC. Invoice posting, Payment and FI activities are carried out in customer ECC.
4. Basic Invoice Information is transferred back to Service provider ECC, so this invoice will be shown as follow on document in the shopping cart. It will show only the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose. There is neither finance activity nor any reporting are made out that system.
Service provider just want to Park the document and not to post it, so it won't hit the GL account. This eliminates considerable work FI configuration settings.
Question is whether this unorthodox method of just parking, but not posting will cause any impact/risk, even though no FI activities is carried on that system.It is not a normal practice and does not fulfill the intent of the park process but as long as you have controls around preventing those parked documents from being posted this should probably work.
Consider them to be a little akin to delivery accruals that are never matched to an invoice, my thoughts are you might want to HOLD rather than PARK these documents.
You will also need to consider what your long term housekeeping and archiving strategy will be for these essentially orphaned documents. -
Planned Dep not posted for retired assets
Hi ,
We are running the asset depreication everymonth end, and it was posting without any errors.
But suddenly we found that some assets which we retired have still not posted the balance depreication and it is still reflecting in Planned Depreication in AW01N for previous months.
Eg: Asset retired on 29th of a month. Depreciation was not posted for this 29 days. and this balance still lies in planned depreication even after the depreciation run.
When i try to do a repeat run it gives an error message,
depreication for Peirod...... already posted.
As we have already run the depreciation, kindly suggest what best can be done without affecting the depreciation which is posted for other assets which is correct.
Thanks & Regards
Sanjay MaratheDear Ramesh,
Thanks for the update, i have got once more important information on this.
The problem lies only in one asset.
When they posted the depreiciation, in the actual run it gave a warning message that
" The posted depreciation and estimated depreciation are different" . But as the user was not aware regarding the Rerun and he has posted depreciation for subsequent periods.
And now it is not allowing to do a rerun for pervious periods.
Acq date : 9/11/2004
DOC : 9/11/2004
Retirement date : 29/05/2007
useful life : 5yrs
Dep key LINR : SLM from remaining life to book value zero.
Depreciation to the day is checked in the Dep Key
Exp useful life 2 years 161 days as on 31st march 2006
It was migrated on 1/4/2006 to SAP.
Points will be awarded.
Thanks & Regards
Sanjay Marathe -
Depreciation planned calculater not as remaining life balance
Hi SAP Expert,
Currently, i have an issue on depreciation planned calculate divided by 12 month instead of 2 month remaining life balance.
Asset Parameters
Useful Life: 3 / 0
Expired Useful Life: 2 / 10
Remaining Life: 0 / 2
Net book value balance is 59,907 and scarp value is 1. So depreciation will divided by 59,906.
Now i see the depreciation posted/planned is every month 4,992.17 for 12 months.
As the asset just left two month life, isn't that depreciation posted/planned will be 29,953 for 2 months?
I am suspect configure on depreciation key.
Please advice where to configure calculate depreciation base on remaining life?
Thanks
regards,
ng chong chuanHi sanjeev and Giridhar,
Thanks for your guys helping.
My depreciation key is set base on below
Dep/int Phase Base method Decl-bal method Period Control Multilevel method
Ord.depreciation 1 0011 001 005 001
Ord.depreciation 1 0017 001 003 003
Base method
0011
Type of depreciation Ord.Depreciation
Dep. Method Percentage from the useful life
Reduce use.life at FY end Blank
Dep.after plnd life end No
Dep below NBValue zero No
Curb No
0017
Type of depreciation Ord.Depreciation
Dep. Method Immediate depreciation
Reduce use.life at FY end Check
Dep.after plnd life end Yes
Dep below NBValue zero No
Curb No
Detail for the asset:
Acquisition Date : 29.09.2006
Capitalization Date : 29.06.2006
Useful Life : 3 years
Depreciation Start Date( Depreaciation Areas tab) : 01.06.2006
But i have seen the first depreciation posted on 30.09.2006 and not 30.06.2006
Please advice.
Thanks
regards,
ng chong chuan -
AFAR test run showing the values but not posting in Real run.
Hi Friends,
i have an issue with AFAR recalculating the depreclation. The details are as below;
1. Asset value date is 15.07.2010. but ordinary dep. start date was set as 01.01.2010 manually by the user.
2. The Period control method 11, the dep. is calculated for entire year for acquisition.
3. we have already calculated depreciation from period 12 2010 to period 04, 2011.
4. Now, we have changed ordinary depreciation start date for 5 asset records from 01.01.2010 to 15.07.2010.
5. Therefore, we recalculated AFAR for these assets for 2010 and test run is showing the values for these 5 asset. The same was expected by the business.
6. When we execute the real run, it is not posting and no change in asset explorer for period 12, 2010 or in current period. No error message is available in spool / job log.
We have opened FI periods as well.
My question is that why the system calculating the values in test run and if it is calculated in test run, why it is not posting in update run?
As per the period control method, the depreciation should not recalculated for half year even we change the ordinary dep,start date from 1st Jan to 15th July.
I request you to clarify my doubt and help me to understand the error which is stoping the values in update run of AFAR.
Best Regards,
PadmajaHi,
Sorry...it is not worked out. Alternatively, i tried the shift factor with variable depreciation and i achieved the values which appeared in AFAR test run.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Padmaja
Edited by: PadmajaCH on May 19, 2011 3:26 PM -
FF67 problem, can't change statement date(statement saved but not post)
I need to change the statement date of a bankstatement. I did not post the statement yet.
I used a wrong statement date, and I want to change it, but I saved it after booking the second screen(the one with the
statement items)
When I look by Manual Bank Statement Overview I see the bankstatement, but it has no Posting complete remark yet, because it has not been postefdofcourse.
The problem is I can't change the statement date, because when I try to Post then the systems gives an error because it does not accept the new statement date I want to use.
Is there a way to solve this problem? The statement has not been posted yet, so I suprised I can't change the statement date.
Anyway I hope somebody can help me out.I had to post them first because otherwise it looks I could not delete the statement.
I saw no Id with only saving, that's why I post them. then the statement got an id.
What do I have to choose to make it possible to delete statements, not posted yet.
I guess I have to select something else because I did not see any Id to choose.
I do a manual input of the bankstatements (no import).
Whst's the best I can do now? What do you mean with FI?
I guess I can do a manual booking on the three(send/receive and general) bankaccounts to get the right position of the accounts?
The bankstatements are ok(booked with ff67) only the three accounts I mention above have the wrong position. -
Success but not Posted Process Scheduler
Hi all,
I just installed HCM 9.1 PT8.52, Demo DB, Oracle 11g Database and Windows server 2008.
I installed and configured the process scheduler (followed the steps) and created a windows service for it, that is 'Automatically started'.
When trying to run a process scheduler, I'm getting a run status 'Success' but the 'Distribution Status' is 'Not Posted'.
I suppose it is not finding the location or something?
What should I check?
Thanks.
BecharaThank you!
The ReportDistAdmin role was missing so I added it.
I shut down process scheduler and re-run it, but I'm still getting 'Not Posted'
Is there any additional step to do before trying the reports?
Update
And the password was missing in the default local node, I added it and it worked!
Thanks you Hakan!
Edited by: Bechara IS on Nov 8, 2012 3:39 AM -
Adding custom dim in planning but not showing up in essbase
I'm on 11.1.2. When I add a member to a standard planning dimension it ends up in essbase just fine but when I add a new custom dimension no luck, dimension is missing. I thought it might have something to do with the fact that we were running on a eval license of weblogic but we replaced it with a full license and restarted essbase and planning but same outcome.
I checked the planning repo and verified that dimension does exist in the "dimension" table
Any thoughts?
thxHi,
That is a strange one, if you restart the planning weblogic service I take it the custom dimension is still there when you log into the application?
If you are on a windows O/S can you do a refresh and then look at the log :- \Hyperion\logs\services\HyS9Planning-sysout.log see if any errors are getting produced.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/ -
Could you please help us for asset depreciation postings are not posted
HI
can any body help,
while creating asset acqistion date 22 january 2010 and Capitalized date is December 18 2009, but depriciation caliculating from acqisition date , where is the mistake happen we did not get , please guide me
thanks
RanamkaHi
we did custimization is correct as you said , multilevel level method Validity start is "from ordinary start data"
while creating asset using as01 we maitained depreciation start is 18.12.2009, but it is considering 22.01.2010 which is first acquisition date
as under stand , both dates calander year is different 2009,2010 and my fiscal year is calander year , so system automatically considering current fiscal year , becuase 2009 periods already closed
please let me know where was the mistake
thanks
Rananka -
Mt940 uploaded but not posting
Hi Experts,
I have successfully uploaded a MT940 (SAP structured format) using ff_5 but posting is not happening. What could be the reason and how to resolve it?
Thanks,
SurajitHi All,
Thanks for the responses received so far. After importing the MT940, if I go back, I get the following message ---
"While importing electronic bank statement, the system determ
that not all external transactions (business transaction cod
text keys, or posting texts) were in
table T028G.
Enter the transactions in table T028G.
Afterwards, start the processing again.
Following entries missing in table T028G:
TransTyp External transaction +- Bank Key Bank Account Shrt key St no MR no
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 3
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 4
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 5
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 6
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 7
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 8
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 9
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 10
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 11
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 12
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 13
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 14
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 15
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 16
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 17
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 18
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 19
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 20
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 21
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 22
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 23
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 24
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 25
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 26
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 27
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 29
MT940 /PT + 242000 30039501 413788 5745 32
MT940 /PT - 242000 30039501 413788 5745 1
MT940 /PT - 242000 30039501 413788 5745 2
MT940 /PT - 242000 30039501 413788 5745 28
MT940 /PT - 242000 30039501 413788 5745 30
MT940 /PT - 242000 30039501 413788 5745 31
Maybe you are looking for
-
In iTunes I was having a problem with it hanging up trying to rip a CD into my library. I had to Force Quit the application twice before I could eventually eject the CD. It turns out that the CD was dirty, I stopped looking at them after about #30 I
-
"device error - the target device isn't suitable for use with this device subclass"
Am using Encore 2.0 with XP with an HPDVD840e. It's been working fine for months now suddenly, even though Encore lists it as a burner, I get this error message when I click on burn. Only once yesterday did it start transcoding. have read similar pro
-
Vendor Payment before Due date
Is there any setting whereby the system will not allow me to pay the vendor before the due date? Or else it will give the warning message for the due date.
-
When I'm scrolling down the msgs. it keeps stopping & saying not responding. Then it will start up again for a few seconds & then stop again. It's very slow. When I'm playing Farmville or Frontierville it's extremely slow too.
-
Sender Cost Center may not be the same as Receiver Cost Center
Hello every body I am trying to create a report that shows the hours that an employee has spend on an activity in a project. Key Figure: Hours Characteristics: Sender Cost Center (Employees Cost Center) Receiver Cost Center Activity code What happens