Depth-of-Field Calculator for Blackberry??

Hi all. I've tried Googling this but I'm not getting hits. I'm looking for a DoF calculator with Hyperfocal distance for my BBerry Pearl. They make'em for Windows Mobile devices and Palm OS. I can't believe I'm the only photographer using BBerry who wants this little program! DOFMaster for BBerry would be awesome. ANYBODY out there have a lead for me?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Steve

Reviving a year old thread.....
I have one you can buy here: http://www.mobihand.com/product.asp?id=43104
Cheers,
Todd

Similar Messages

MS Project 2007 - Help with custom field calculation for grouped by dates view

Hello
I am trying to creat a view that counts number of students in courses (while # Students is a custom field that is filled manually and courses are tasks).
The view should be grouped by Quarters, Months, and weeks (Calculated custom Text fields)
The weeks groups are displayed by the start day of each week.
For example:
The view counts how many students are in courses in a specific week/month/quarter.
This is the group by definition:
Those are the fields calculations:
“WW_Start” field calculation:
(Year([Start]) & " W " & Format([Start],"WW") & " " & "   [" & Datevalue(ProjDateSub([Start],CStr(Weekday([Start])-1),"Standard")) & "]")
“MM” field calculation:
Year([Start]) & " M " & Format([Start],"MM")
Basically it works but it doesn't cover a situation where a course is more then a week.
Lets say that the duration of the task is 12 days, the task should appear on 3 different weeks groups.
But what i did puts the tasks only in the group that shows the first week of the task.
How can i change my calculations or my view so that in the second, and third week of the task it will also show the task and it's attributes.
For example:
- "UV5 ACM" task should also be in W 45 not just W 44.
Anyone has an idea how to do that?
Ofir Marco , MCTS P.Z. Projects

Hi
First, thanks for the comment "nice neat groups" :)
I think you understood correctly what is my issue.
Second, about your question: the class have the same number of students during the course period.
It will have 10 students even if the duration is 1 day or 10 days.
if you look at the basic gantt chart you will see a row like this:
Task name        Duration        Num_Students     Resource names (Instructors)
Course YYY       10d                10
Instructor X
it is an attribute on the task, not the assiment.
When i group by dates (Weeks, months, quarters) or by another field (can be course type for example) i the students are summed in the task summary level for all tasks.
Lets say i group by all the tasks (Classes) that are in the 1st quarter, and lets say for the example that there are 3:
Task 1 --> 5 students
Task 2 --> 10 students
Task 3 --> 7 students
Then, the group by summary should count:
Quarter 1 - 2014:   22 (students)
Task 1 --> 5
Task 2 --> 10
Task 3 --> 7
By the way, it doesn't matter if the version is project 2007,2010, 2013, the logic is the same.
Hope it helps and i'll be glad to have some ideas or evan get examples for solution in a project file by e-mail.
Ofir Marco , MCTS P.Z. Projects

Model Binding and Calculated Field Syntax for "class" Attribute

Hi,
I tried to use the calculated field syntax from SAP UI5 to change the CSS class attribute of an element based on some model property, i.e., I wanted to change the class in the corresponding formatter function based on the currently bound value. However, my formatter function is not called. When I use the same syntax on a text attribute, it works.
I also tried to use normal property binding, but it did not work on the class attribute either (it just put class="{property}" in the rendered HTML).
Is there anything I missed or is it just not possible to use property binding and calculated field syntax for class attributes? Did anybody try something like this before?
I think it is a standard use case to change the CSS class based on some model property. So, if anybody knows how to do that, could you give a short example?
Best regards
Svenja

They have a class property. At least, I can do the following in an XML view:
<Button
              icon="sap-icon://add"
              press="onButtonPress"
              class="my-button-class" />
I would expect the following to work as well, but for me it did not:
<Button
              icon="sap-icon://add"
              press="onButtonPress"
              class="{/customClass}" />
This renders the following HTML (cropped to the important parts):
<button type="button" class="sapMBtn {/customClass}">
</button>
It seems like the class attribute is something special although I don't see a reason why. Other HTML templating engines, for example, support things like that.

Would like to use apex_item to popup a calculator for a text item field, is this possible in apex 4.2.2?

would like to use apex_item to popup a calculator for a text item field, is this possible in apex 4.2.2?

I imagine you could reverse engineer what APEX delivers when you declaratively choose text field with calculator.
For example, the generated source includes an event:
onclick="calculatorPopUp_p_t01();"
These get added to the attributes of your apex_item.text() call.
Alternatively you just paste the entire generated content, escaping the necessary data.

Depth of field displayed in inches or centimeters

I wish the depth of field would be displayed in inches or centimeters (for those using the metric system) instead of f1.2, f2.8, etc. I wish it would show it like this: f1.2 (2 inches) or something along these lines.
I understand depth of field is not a fixed value. The depth of field changes based on the distance to the subject, aperture and focal length. I'd like to see the camera body doing these calculations in real time and displaying them somewhere in the viewfinder. I'd assume you could toggle it on or off in the menu for those who don't need this.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

If you install Magic Lantern on your camera, it has all the depth of field information available for display on the rear LCD so it is possible.
Here is a video I made that shows how the values change as you change focus distance or focal length.
Mike Sowsun
S110, SL1, 5D Mk III

Calculation for subcontracting item of type N (non stock) as it for type L(Stock)

Hi Gurus,
I have a Requirement for calculating the cost for Subcontracting Non stock items N as it is getting calculated in standard functionality for subcontracting items of Type L.
This will be done in CK11n ( used to calculate the standard cost estimate of the product) for header as well as component materials.
please suggest the user exit or Badi where i can change.
Please refer the below logic-
BOM for the material 2000500 as Header and 1LPL0835298AB as a component and this component has an assembly with 7008508 as a component and this component is an Sub contracted item and this has an assembly with component 1LBA182151-3.
Price calculation for the material 7008508 (Item Category as N). Since this is sub contracted item the price will picked from field EINE-NETPR.
In EINA, pass the material (MATNR=7008508) to fetch the list of info records (INFNR) created for that material.
Then it has to input those info records to EINE table along with Purchasing organization (EINE-EKORG=PT02).
From the output of EINE table, it should compare the price (EINE-NETPR) of the PIR and should take the least price from those PIR`s.
If the currency is other than PLN, then it should be converted to PLN based on conversion charges.
For Material (MATNR=1LBA182151-3), it should pass the material number to table MBEW along with valuation area (BWKEY = WERKS).
From the output, it should check the Price control (VPRSV) ‘V’ or ‘S’
If ‘V’ the price will be picked from the field “VERPR”
If ‘S’ the price will be picked from the field “STPRS”
Also from the output, it should check the Price unit (PEINH) ‘1’ or other than ‘1’. If it is other than ‘1’ it should divide the VERPR or STPRS by PEINH. Then this is the price of the Material “1LBA182151-3”.
The material (MATNR=1LBA182151-3) should be passed to table “MARA” and will take the Base unit of measure from that table “MEINS”.
Br,
Surya

Hi Surya,
Please put breakpoints in any of the below BADI's and check if any of them will trigger for your
requirement:
VALUATION_CK                            BAdI for Valuation in Product Costing
CK_KALAMATCON2_CI                       BAdI for CI Fields for Table KALAMATCON2
COSTINGRUN_CK                           Edit Costing Run
COST_APPORTION_CK                       Maint Apportionment Structure Joint Production: Dist Rules
CO_PROD_COSTING_CK                      Cost Management for Joint Products (Costing, Target Costs)
DATA_EXTENSION_CK                       For Data Enrichment in Product Costing
DYNPRO_EXTENSION_CK                     BAdI for Interface Enhancement in Costing
ORDER_COSTING_CK                        Enables Header Data Changes in Preliminary Order Costing
QUANTITY_STRUCT_CK                      Enables Quantity/Structure Changes in Costing
SUR_STOCK_TRANSF_CK                     Overhead on Materials with Stock Transfer Between Plants
Thanks
Sri

How to prevent BPC from automated calculating for hierarchies / nodes?

Hi experts,
I am looking for a practicable way to prevent the system from automated calculating for hierarchies, and especially for nodes within hierarchies?
Let's say, I have ENTITIES (AS A HIERACHY) in rows and ACCOUNTS in COLUMNS. Now I want the system to block adding up the values for one specific account on node XY. Instead of the sum of all base member entities, the cell for account XY should be left empty.
Is there a practicable way to deal with this?

Hi Stefan,
you can prevent the system to calculate a node by editing the Formula Property in the Dimension.
You can insert 0 or null to the Formula field for the specific element.
But in this case the values from your leaf elements lying under your node wont be calculated even in higher hierarchy nodes.
For ex.: with the following structure
-A
---A1
A11
A12
---B1
B11
B12
If you set A1 to 0, the top node A will only be calculated by values of B1
Regards
Jörg

Field calculation doesn't auto update

Hello -
I have a complicated PDF Form that has several pages of fields that are totaled and averaged on the last page. I'm using Acrobat X on the Mac.
Basically, on the last page there are 2 subtotal fields that are calculated based on other (direct-entry) numeric fields in the document. Those 2 SUBTOTAL fields update automatically when I change the direct-entry fields. So far so good.
But, then I have a FINAL AVERAGE field that is supposed to average the two subtotals. But when I update one of the direct-entry values, the subtotals update but the final average does not.
Here's where it gets screwy:
If I try to manually enter a valid number (validation is OK from 0-3) in one of the SUBTOTALs, the subtotal does not change but this forces the FINAL AVERAGE field to update correctly.
If I try to manually enter an invalid # (such as 5) in either of the 2 SUBTOTAL fields Acrobat won't let me enter that number, but it WILL recalculate the final average using that number and give me the wrong answer.
I have tried locking the fields, turning validation on and off, but neither has any effect.
I'm using the AVERAGE calculation function. I wonder if the problem is that I'm averaging a field that is itself using the Average calculation.
There are only 2 fields being averaged. I could just add them and divide by 2, but that is not an option in the field calculation, unless I write a javascript, which I haven't learned how to do yet. So, I can't tell whether that would fix the problem. Is there a way to write a custom calculation formula other than using javascript?
Thanks for any help you can give!

The field calculation order is most likely not correct. You just have to set the order to whatever makes sense for your form.
To do this in Acrobat 10, go to form editing mode (Tools > Forms > Edit) , and then select: Tasks > Other Tasks > Edit Fields > Set Field Calculation Order

CONTRIBUTION MARGIN (PLAN) CALCULATION FOR PRODUCTS (PER UNIT, LOCATION WIS

Requirement of a Report to calculate Contribution Margin (Plan) - For Calculating Contribution Margin.
2 Key figures need to be arrived (per unit/cv of product, locationwise) are Net Sales Realisation (NSR) and Total Variable Cost (TVC).
a) To arrive at NSR (Plan), all the combinations of upcoming discounts and Free Goods schemes which are going to be in force for the coming month for a product, need to be adjusted in the Net Sales Value to get NSR value per unit of Product (SKU / CV), locationwise
The NSR is the result of adjusting Discounts, Excise and Schemes to the List price of a product.
b) TVC is the result of adding Total Material Cost(TMC) + [(LabourPower) conversion cost]Freight.
Calculation of material cost takes into account the LCC (Landed cost chart) price of the materials, which is a future price.
The Total variable Manufacturing Cost (TMC+Conversion cost) can be calculated using Costing Run (CK40N), using LCC price.
In COPA Reporting the values like List price, Discounts, Excise, Free Goods Schemes and freight flows from Billing Documents (SD) because of condition types mapping in to value fields in COPA, which are components for calculating NSR (Actual), based on the Actual sales.
We want to understand how do the Plan values (List price, Discounts, Excise, Free Goods Schemes and freight) per unit of Product, location wise, flow to the Value fields in COPA Planning, so that the Contribution Margin (Plan) can be calculated for each product per unit , location wise.
Contribution Margin = NSR u2013 Total Variable Cost.

Then you hit a bug in your version of Oracle. You may want to investigate and update to a newer version. I get the following error when trying to register your schema in 10.2.0.1
ORA-31154: invalid XML document
ORA-19202: Error occurred in XML processing
LSX-00246: invalid QNAME "***_voting_flag"
This error is consistent with Spy 2008 as well (I didn't try Xerces but I've got two that agree so it's good for me).

Recurring document - FBD1 with incorrect due-date calculation for AP

Hi Gurus,
in our ECC 6.0 system we are creating with F.14 FI-documents (SAPF120) based on recurring documents (created with FBD1) for various purposes (e.g. Recurring entries for IC-business).
Therefore it's important that the system provides in the final processing of the recurring documents the correct net-due-date in the AP-document based on the document date and the payment term included in the AP-masterdata (LFB1-ZTERM).
Problem:
The processed FI-document contains the correct payment term but the calculated net-due-date with regards to the document date (BKPF-BLDAT) isn't correct. A Dummy-Update of the FI-document with FB02 on field BSEG-ZTERM provides finally the correct net due date but this a not recommended solution.
Any ideas how to solve that issue???
Thanks for replies.
BR, Bernd

Hi Vishnu,
the defined payment term is
fix day: 15
additional month: 1.
Default for baseline date is posting date
Therefore the expectation is that net due date is calculated for posting date
e.g. : 01.02.2012 to 15.03.2012.
The line item after processing in FI-document shows :
Posting Date : 01.02.2012
Bline Date: 01.02.2012
Days/percent: 35
Net due date: 07.03.2012 (dd.mm.yyyy)
That's wrong according to my understanding of the payment term definition.
BR, Bernd

Technical field/table for Non moving report

Dear All,
I want the technical table name and field name for the following to make the Slow/NON moving stock report.
Material Number
Decription
stock in hand
batch no
UOM
Value
Exp Date
Mfg Date
Date of last consumption
Total No of days from last consumption
Where used FG
Date of Purchase
Vendor
Thanks & Regards,
Sandeep.

for a non-moving report you have to look at the stock and need to compare it probably with movements directly or consumptions stored in infostructures.
depending on the basis you want analyze you may have to read much more tables than you expect and you certainly have the below listed fields in many tables
Material Number (MARD, MCHA1, MCHB)
Decription - MAKT
stock in hand - MARD, MCHB and many other tables in case of special stock
batch no . MCHA, MCH1, MCHB
UOM - MARA, MARM,
Value - MBEW - and may other tables in case of special stock
Exp Date - MCHA, MCH1
Mfg Date - MCHA, MCH1
Date of last consumption - MKPF, SO32
Total No of days from last consumption - have to be calculated by yourself in the report
Where used FG - STPO
Date of Purchase - EKKO
Vendor - EKKO, MCHA, MCH1

Depth of Field tool in Elements 11

I have a problem with the depth os field tool in Elements 11. When I add focus, the focus area becomes a black smudge, is there a fault? Your help is appreciated.

Hi,
OK, in case it makes any difference, what operating system are you using?
To me, it looks as though you are trying the simple method.
Are you clicking on the Add Blur button first? - Does the image go out of focus after you click on the button?
After that, then you select the area to be in focus as mentioned above.
It is important to do things in the order top to bottom.
The guided mode really uses layers, one of which is the black mask you are seeing. For interest sake, if you manage to get it to work properly, if you switch to Expert mode, you will see the layers it has created.
Good luck
Brian

Depth of field with iPhone 4 camera

Hi,
Anyone having any luck getting a shallow depth of field with the iPhone 4 camera?
In Apple's ads they show a demo shifting the focus from the background to the foreground and the background softens nicely.
The system is working meaning I can choose different things to focus on and the blue square moves and the exposure changes.
Just wondering if it is possible to create a more dramatic soft background effect. Thanks.

Yes I have noticed that seems to work. It's pretty good for q phone camera. I took sme shots at a concert last night and they came out quite well.
Thanks.

16-35 L USM lens and struggling with sharp focus and depth of field.

I just purchased the 16-35 L lens after reading all the reviews. I was previoulsy using the 24-70mm and was happy with the results. I am new to the Canon Mark 5D III and the new wide angle lens. I took pictures yesterday for over two hours and came back with no sharp images and no depth of field even when shooting at F/22. I zoomed in or moved close to my subjects expecting the images to be tack sharp but I am extremely disappointed. Not ONE of my pictures were tack sharp. What am I doing wrong? Are there correct settings for close-ups, landscapes and portraits with this lens? At F/22 I shoot 1/3 of the way into the picture expecting that everything in front and behind will be sharp. Not so. I am very frustrated as a newcomer to this camera. Please advise or guide me to a great source to learn.
thank you
Solved!
Go to Solution.

It'd really help to see an example, it's hard to guess without seeing it.
You shouldn't have to stop down to f/22 to get a large DoF at 16mm. In fact, part of what you might be seeing is softness from diffraction at that aperture. Try f/8, the DoF is actually quite wide at that aperture.
What shutter speeds are you at? Yes, you can get away with much slower speeds with UWA, but it can still soften images.
Lastly, I've never been able to get results out of an UWA like I can with longer lenses or a prime. I can get good results, and they clean up quite nicely in post, but viewing untouched photos at 100% it's never sharp like a good prime, or even a good tele really. So I don't know what you're expecting out of it. It usually doesn't matter since UWA are used for larger subject matter than the other lenses... but that has been my experience.

What's the best ND filter to buy to get the most shallow depth of field while taking pictures?

I have a Rebel SL1 by the way.

This depends on if you're trying to use flash at the same time.
Outdoors in full mid-day sun, the exposure based on a "Sunny 16" rule is f/16 and the shutter speed set to the inverse of the ISO speed. At ISO 100 you'd use 1/100th. But if you dial the aperture open 5 stops to f/2.8 then you can dial the shutter faster by 5 stops to 1/3200 and have an equivalent exposure.
f/2.8 is fairly shallow, but it is not the shallowest... f/2 and f/1.4 are even more shallow. Canon makes 50mm and 85mm f/1.2L (L series lenses) which can create especially shallow depth of field (particularly the 85mm). Canon used to have a 50mm f/1.0 lens but they have not made that in years.
Depending on your subject... there's a point where the depth of field is so shallow that it's not possible to to get your entire subject into acceptable focus. At f/1.4 and f/1.2 the depth of field can get REALLY thin (especially at close focusing distances.)
While most of my lenses can handle f/2.8 or better, I often find I prefer f/4 unless I can control subject placement well enough that f/2.8 (or lower) can still work.
Your SL1 caps out at 1/4000th sec shutter speed. So if you were to shoot in full mid-day sun (a bit of an extreme example) and you wanted to use, say, an f/2 aperture, you could not halve the shutter speed to 1/6400th because your shutter doesn't offer that setting. But you COULD do that with just a single stop ND filter (ND 0.3 -- when represented this way each "0.1" worth of density is equal to 1/3rd of a stop of light. So 0.3 is 3/3rds or 1 full stop.).
I have a 2 stop (ND 0.6), 3 stop (ND 0.9) and 10 stop (ND 3.0) filters in my bag.
If you use flash, this changes things... with flash (which I usually use during the day to fill the deep shadows and soften the light) you are capped at the flash sync speed. For your SL1 that's 1/200th sec (or slower) unless you have a speedlite that supports "high speed sync" mode.
In this situation, you might actually want 4 or 5 stops worth of ND if you are shooting in mid-day sun using fill-flash that doesn't support high-speed sync. You can change the shutter from 1/100th to 1/200th (1 stop) but you'd still have 4 more stops to make up to get from f/16 down to f/2.8... one more stop to get to f/2.
You can "stack" filters, but stacking increases the odds of artifacts from reflections... use high quality anti-reflective coated filters (this is a situation where it doesn't pay to buy budget filters.)
The major caution is that there is a point where the shallow depth of field is "too shallow" for the subject.
Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da

Depth-of-Field Calculator for Blackberry??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for