DEVOLUÇÃO DE EXPORTAÇÃO - CFOP 3201 - GRC VALIDA DADOS DI.

Boa tarde a todos!
Estamos em um projeto de NFE XML 2.00 e nos deparamos com o seguinte erro:
Ao emitirmos um NF-e de devolução da mercadoria que se encontrava no Porto (devolução de exportação - CFOP 3201), a validação do monitor GRC informa que é necessário constar os dados de importação, apesar deste processo não se tratar de importação. Os seguintes logs de validação são gerados:
Erro de validação: campo Código do fabricante estrangeiro no sistema. Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_ADI-CFABRICANTE, ID campo I028)
Erro de validação: campo Nº da adição. Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_ADI-NADICAO, ID campo I026)
Erro de validação: campo Nº sequencial do artigo na adição. Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_ADI-NSEQADIC, ID campo I027)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-CEXPORTADOR, ID campo I024)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-DDESEMB, ID campo I023)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-DDI, ID campo I020)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-NDI, ID campo I019)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-UFDESEMB, ID campo I022)
Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-XLOCDESEMB, ID campo I021)
Estamos no SAPK-10015INSLLNFE e as seguintes notas relacionadas a validação estão aplicadas:
1493980     Validation for field xJust in cancel and skipping messages
1499921     Problem with validation after implementing SP15
1500046     Upgrade validation rule for field ID for version 2.00
1500742     Adjust validation for field NADICAO and NSEQADIC layout 2.00
1502217     Extend validation rules for , layout 2
1504379     Adjust validation for field X_CLISTSERV
1511291     Update allowed values for field E1_CPAIS for validation
1511577     Update validation rules for field VUNCOM_V20
1520861     Update validation rules for OIL_CPRODANP and OIL_UFCONS
Não encontrei nenhuma nota SAP recente para o componente SLL-NFE que seja relacionada a este problema.
Desde já agradeço pela ajuda.
Sds / Renato Penido.

Boa tarde, Fernando,
Obrigado pela pronta resposta.
Debugamos a BADI e descobrimos que os dados de importação estão sendo gravado "em branco", gerando o erro de validação no GRC, tal qual dito por você.
Aprimoramos a lógica da BADI para que a tag de importação não seja preenchida indevidamente para as notas de devolução do porto e as notas foram aprovadas.
Muito obrigado,
Renato Penido.

Similar Messages

Appstudio exporter does not contain a valid signature

HI I am trying to install AppStudio plugin to work with InDesign but Extension Manager is throwing the following error...
appstudio exporter does not contain a valid signature !
I have updated all software.
(I am downloading new apps in the background)
I have a CC subscription

Hi,
please click "tools"->"preferences", unselect "Allow Extension Manager to access Internet" option, and then try to install it again.

Export file is not a valid HTMLDB export file

Hi All,
I have a serious problem today when i want to import the exported application file to another workspace in other machine.Both workspace have same name & same schema in which application resides.I got the messages "export file is not a valid HTMLDB export file" .I have search thru the forum and have got several possibly solution.But i want to know what should be done to successfully build the application.Even after exporting file from different workspace and diff name from diff machine still i got the same error message.
Any Ideas ?
Thanks in advance ,
Cheers,
Eman

I export an application resides in workspace HTMLDB_W in APP_OWN schema in database A version 9.2.0.1 and import that application to HTMLDB_W1 in APP_OWN schema
in database B version 9.2.0.5.Both database have HTMLDB version 1.6.1.02.when importing file the files are successfully imported but after click on Install the "Application Install"
region appears.Here the information shows below.....
Logged Into Workspace: HTMLDB_W1
Export File WorkspaceID:
Export File Application:
Export File Version:
Export File Parse As Schema:
Application Origin: This application was exported from another workspace.
Parse As Schema :APP_OWN
i select Run & build application then reuse my application ID .
There is no other application in the same schema & workspace of same application ID.Also when export the file the Character set is Unicode -UTF & while importing i choose the same character set in DOS format.I change the options later but nothing helps me......
I think since the export file version & workspace id cant detectable so the application fails with following error message ::
1 error has occurred
File is not a valid HTML DB application export file.
Previously i use the same workspace later i changed the workspace so now the export & import workspace is different & import workspace ID: 658006861199719
export file workspace ID : 689311213291671
If need more information please revert back to me.
Regards,
Eman

Getting error while exporting certificate to OIF Certificate Validation

Hi All,
Currently I am working with Oracle identity federation 10.1.4.0.1. I am facing one problem while exporting certificate to Certificate Validation, the error I am getting after importing certificate at console is:
ERROR - oracle.security.crypto.asn1.ASN1FormatException: Got tag 0 instead of 16.
Write failed: Broken pipe
But It doesn't displaying any error in webapge after exporting certificate.
Any help in this regard really appreciated.
Thanks,
Iceman
Edited by:OIF version included

If the certificate is in text PEM format, please ensure that the actual certificate content is enclosed within:
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MII................
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
Thats all. It should also not have the certificate in text. Just the content within those lines.
Hope this helps.

Cannot export private key: "key not valid for use in specified state"

Hi,
This is a bit of a long story but I hope someone can give us some guidance.
We use authentication certificates issued from our own Enterprise CA to control user and machine authentication via RADIUS/NPS for our wireless network. Certificates are deployed via group policy/autoenrollment. In general this works well but
we have an intermittent problem where user authentication stops working for a user who was fine before. The user certificate looks OK via Certmgr (shows as valid, shows that there is a private key associated with the certificate). The NPS server
logs show that the machine has been authenticated and granted access, but the user in this situation doesn't show up in the server logs at all.
The only solution in this case is to connect to the wired network and request a new certificate for the user (either via certmgr or just by deleting the duff cert and logging off/on again to get the cert via autoenrollment).
The interesting thing is that while a "working" certificate can be exported with no problem, a duff certificate cannot be exported with its private key, giving the error "key not valid for use in specified state". (Obviously the certificates
come from the same template, and the key is not marked unexportable). The key files are present in %userprofile%\Appdata\Roaming\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA and the user permissions on these files look correct.
After much searching of the forums I tried running certutil-repairstore on the duff certificate and that also returned the same error. I also tried an undocumented switch Certutil -user -key -v and again, got a very similar error "Loadkeys returned
key not valid for use in specified state. 0x8009000b (-2146893813)".
I'm assuming that the fact that the key is unexportable/corrupt is also the reason why the certificate can no longer be used for authentication.
Does anyone have any clues as to what might be causing this, and/or if a certificate with a key in this state can be repaired?
Thanks!

I can just share an experience I once had that was somewhat similar:
In this case certificates could sometimes not be enrolled and the CSP came up with a related error message.
The root was the software / driver (?) for a hardware dongle required to run some software. This "driver" added a registry key to the list of CSPs (under these HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\Defaults\Provider - but I have seen this with
XP, so the exact location might be different now).
This fake CSP entry that had quite a weird name effectively broke other CSPs. After removing the access to / generation of keys worked fine.
So it would be interesting to know if you run some software that is "close to CSPs or cryptography".
Elke

Bug 2.1: Export to Excel fails: no valid colums available...

Hello,
I read some threads about the error
No valid columns available for export,
we do not currently support clob or blob columnsand none of the workarounds work for me
[Create View|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=3829495]: I only have a read only user without any permissions
[Scroll Count Cancel|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=3829495]
[(Re)Activate Completion Insight|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=3821718]
[No dblink|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=3896095]
My query has only NUMBER and VARCHAR2 as results and 1200 rows.
Log says WARNING     34     10656
oracle.dbtools.raptor.dialogs.actions.TableExportAction     oracle.dbtools.parser.plsql.TabCol.getTableNodes(TabCol.java:293)The export works in 1.2, does not work in 1.5.5 (with message "WARNING     29     17954     oracle.dbtools.raptor.dialogs.actions.TableExportAction     oracle.dbtools.parser.TabCol.getTableNodes(TabCol.java:275)"
Add: I played around with the query: the export fails when the query is like
SELECT col1
      ,(SELECT something
        FROM   whatever
       ) AS col2
FROM   some_table;while the following works
SELECT col1
      ,col2
FROM   some_table;Regards
Marcus
Edited by: Marwim on 22.12.2009 15:35

Filed
Bug 9246364 - otn: export to xls is not working for a query
-Raghu

Error on export to PDF, working correctly in viewer.

I have been wrestling with an error for a while now and would appreciate any insights offered here to help me correct this issue and move on with my project.
The situation is this, I have a .net application which includes eight different Crystal Reports. All of the reports presently display and behave correctly in the browser using the crViewer.
However, one does not export to Excel or PDF at all (the other 7 do so, and do so without error or issue).
Instead, I am given this error when the export is requested:
Error in File C:\DOCUME1\x\LOCALS1\Temp\Detail {F7B06596-9318-42CD-8849-7C800C47D161}.rpt:
Failed to retrieve data from the database.
Details: Database Vendor Code: 512
Source: "CrystalDecisions.ReportAppServer.DataSetConversion"
I have tried exporting the report with both an ExportToHttpResponse and an ExportToStream approach, both result in the same error. The process of generating and attempting to export this report is no different than that used by the other reports which are working correctly. I have tried placing the export call both in the page_load and in the page_loadcomplete and have tried using both the report object being sent to the viewer (which works fine for the other reports) as well as creating a new report document exclusive to the export routine. I have validated the database and tested the page on two different servers, all to no avail.
This report is somewhat more elaborate than the others, but shares a data access approach (stored procedures) as well as many basic design elements with the other reports - and again, the report displays correctly in the report viewer - it is only failing when an export is attempted.
I would be happy to provide additional details as needed in order to facilitate troubleshooting, and any and all help is greatly appreciated.

It was subreport-related, though I still do not know the exact root cause.
I was having trouble with both the built-in export as well as a custom process.
Removing the subreports as suggested, I isolated the failure to one of the three subs and rebuilt this subreport from scratch (it was only three fields) and now the report has no trouble with the pdf export. I am not sure if it had a resolvable technical issue or if it was just corrupted, as it is now working, I am not going to expend much energy on finding out.
Thanks for the suggestion.

Export a report (automatically)

Hi,
Running ZCM 11 and ZRS 11 on Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 (finally )
There are some reports within ZCM and I have customize it so it will output the desired results. From the output I can also select an export to either a EXCEL, CSC or PDF file. I have also setup the system to email me the results in EXCEL.
Is there anyway to have the system automatically export a CSV file automatically to a location on the server. Emailing to me with the link to the result is ok but requires me to manually copy the data and save it as a CSV. EXCEL is also a problem as it is not easily imported into other management program. CSV is the best because the data is in plain text and limited by comma (obviously). The process also breaks down if I'm not at work etc...
Please help...

It may sound silly but I'm trying to understand the command but without example it's very difficult learn:
report-generate-now (rpgn) (report name) (report folder) (report type) (format type) (report destination) [options]
Generates a report in the specified file format.
(report folder) - Path to the folder containing the report.
(report type) - Type of the report.
(format type) - The format in which the report should be exported to the file. Valid values for the WID report type are EXCEL, WEBI, or PDF.
(report destination) - The destination of the exported report. Valid values are BO, SMTP, and UNMANAGED_DISK.
I'm using:
zman report-generate-now "Device List for WOL" "C:\Program Files (x86)\Novell\ZENworks\share\boe-publish\reports\User Reports\User Details Report.wid" WID EXCEL UNMANAGED_DISK -f=c:\wol
Error:Failed to connect to the CMS server. For more information, see the zman log. Error:An internal error occurred. Please see the zman log for full stack trace.
ERROR: 16
My Questions:
Where is the (report folder)? My search only turn up one folder of revelance: C:\Program Files (x86)\Novell\ZENworks\share\boe-publish\reports\User Reports\User Details Report.wid
The path or report file is probably incorrect
What is the report type:

Export with query option

Hi all!
I need export different tables from my 10.2.0.4 database using expdp. Some of this tables, needs be under different conditions. How can I prepare my parameter file for this export?
Table1 --> query: where valid=1
Table2 --> query: where valid=1 and secure=0
Table3 --> query: where valid=1 and secure=1
Thanks a lot!!!

I'm a bit confused about parameter file ...
*1. ways to export*
There are 3 ways to export, you can use parameter file but there is no need for it (personally I never use it)
a. using expdp
b. using PL/SQL
c. external table
*2. what to export*
you simply use QUERY clause to specify where conditions, for example if you want to use (a) then it would look like this
$ expdp query=employees:"where salary>10000" tables=employeesif if you want to use parameter file
TABLES:emp_salary
DUMPFILE=dump_dir
QUERY= emp_salary:"WHERE emp_id IN (SELECT id from emp
where join_date> to_date('2004-01-01','YYYY-MM-DD')
AND dept='SALSE')"here are some useful links
Part I http://www.orafaq.com/node/65
Part II http://www.orafaq.com/node/67
Part III http://www.orafaq.com/node/74
http://www.rampant-books.com/art_nanda_datapump.htm

HR master data change export with Interface-Toolbox PU12

Hello out there !
I implemented a HR master data change export with PU12 at one of my customers.
It works fine - with one little problem:
It is only possible to export one period (actual or selected).
Is there any possibility to export more than one period (also periods in the future) ?
The request is to export also master data with validity start date in a future period.
Thanks for any help.
Greetings, Holger Mächtig

Dear Holger,
I am very curious about your problem last year. Is it possible to do a future export with PU12?
I am now working with PU12 for the first time and I have set up a export file in PU12.
But when I am doing an update without filling the name for the file layout I have the following error:
"An error occurred when opening the "export file"
When I am filling the file layout I have the following error:
"An error occurred when writing to an export file" (Error Number E107).
"File processing: end of file".
When I am not doing an update the export file runs and seems right.
Do you know what I am doing wrong?
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Yvette

System copy via SAPINST (Export/Import)

Hello!
We are using SAP ERP EHP4 system on Windows with SAP MaxDB (Version: 7.7.07.09).
We would like to copy this productive system to QAS system.
Therefore we successfully run SAPINST (with running db and sap, because we cannot stop productive system) with option Export and have currently an valid export of productive system.
After we read several sap notes (such as 1014782, 129352) we found that the system copy procedure Backup/Restore will be recomended.
Questions
1) Can we still copy productive system via export and import option with SAPINT?
1a) Should/must the SAP Max DB instance be installed before runing SAPINT on the target server?
1b) Which SAP MaxDB version should be installed on the target server?
Has some one experience with system copy of SAP systems with SPA MaxDB via Export/Import?
It will be great to get some answers or recommendation.

You're back with a new ID after using:
Holger Thomasson
Jgen Pfeiffer
Thom Heinemann
H. Lemke
and now Tom Hermann.
too bad it took me so long to find you!

Cs4 Transparancies wont export

I am exporting .pngs for use in AE CS4 with a "multiply" transparency. the first couple worked properly but now I can not get Illustrator to export a multiply to save my life. I changed nothing between the exports! I have found no solution. I have re started and done a dozen tests with different settings.
Any help will be awesome. Thanks
CS4 Design premium and production premium on a G5 tower if it helps.

As the others said, blending modes cannot be stored in the pixel data. What you are most likely seeing, is that your current export has no layers with valid pixels below it. Naturally, this would not allow any program to calculate persistent color and transparency values, whereas your otehr exports may have met this requirement, giving you the flattened result. Even those files are treated as "normal" blending mode in AE, though, without any additional changes done by the user and even in AE you need to at least have a solid below a layer to get correct blending results - the composition background may have a preview color, but is not considered for processing.
Mylenium

Mass RAR Rule Set Changes

My integrator is telling me that there is no way to complete a mass update to the authorizations/restrictions in our RAR rule set (AC 5.3.) That is, at the recommendation of our external auditor, we added additional transactions to existing rules but failed to activate the company code restrictions to ignore display only access and therefore, I am receiving a significant number of SODs which are false positives.
I find it hard to believe that there is no easy way to activate the company code authorization objects (and others) for the additional transactions in the rule set. The integrator is telling me that this has to be done one by one. Please tell me that there is an easier way.
Apologies if this is a repeat; if this topic is out there, could someone point me in the right direction?Thank you in advance!
Thank you in advance!

Is there any easy way? Depends on what you think is easy
For mass updates to function I will typically use the: Configuration -> Rule Upload feature. To perform an update to an authorization object, you would use the 'Function Authorization' selection.
To upload the function you'd want to use the file formats from the 9 upload files SAP provides for the ruleset. If I recall correctly, function uploads will overwrite the existing function so it is important that your upload file contains all existing function data + the additional auth objects you want to activiate.
As with any text file manipulation and download/upload or export/import features into GRC you want to be particulary careful with formatting and attention to detail. Probably a good idea to take a backup of the rules if this is your first time working with the ruleset files.

Formacao errada do XML 2.0

Boa noite Pessoal,
Estou com problema na geração do XML.
A NF-e é aprovada pela SEFAZ porem quando faço o download da mesma ou quando envio o XML para o cliente o xml esta errado
segue XML errado:
Estamos com o SP do GRC no SP16 acredito ser esse o problema.
Obrigado,
Rafael

Boa noite Fernando,
Desculpa a insistência antes de aplicar os SPs do GRC. Fui envolvido agora no problema, pois o cliente deu Go-Live há alguns dias e querem evitar ao máximo aplicar SPs.
Analisei o erro e o que acontece exatamente é o seguinte:
Quando o proxy de retorno do batch é acionado no GRC, ele dispara a função /XNFE/006_BATCH_REQUEST_IN que por sua vez chama a /XNFE/CONV_STRUC_TO_XMLSTRING, nesta última o método cl_proxy_xml_transform=>abap_to_xml_xstring é acionado e é nesse cara que, acredito eu, o problema ocorre.
Num sistema que funciona normal o XML após a execução desse método fica assim:
<n0:TProtNFe versao="2.00" xmlns:n0="http://www.portalfiscal.inf.br/nfe" xmlns:p
rx="urn:sap.com:proxy:PID:/1SAI/TAS935B4859582A3873CB9C:700:2009/02/10" xmlns:n1
="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"><n0:infProt><n0:tpAmb>2</n0:tpAmb><n0:verA
plic>SP_NFE_PL_006h</n0:verAplic><n0:chNFe>35*****************6316722</n0:chNFe><n0:dhRecbto>2011-03-30T19:41:10</n0:dhRecbto><n0:nProt>135110
003286725</n0:nProt><n0:digVal>t1aficigF/Qvck2k2yaYYOX92tg=</n0:digVal><n0:cStat
>100</n0:cStat><n0:xMotivo>Autorizado o uso da NF-e</n0:xMotivo></n0:infProt></n
0:TProtNFe>
Já no ambiente com problema (A Tag TProtNFe não tem informação de namespace "n0:"):
<TProtNFe versao="2.00"><n0:infProt xmlns:n0="http://www.portalfiscal.inf.br/nfe
"><n0:tpAmb>1</n0:tpAmb><n0:verAplic>SP_NFE_PL_006e</n0:verAplic><n0:chNFe>35****************12301340667828</n0:chNFe><n0:dhRecbto>2011-04-04T22:09:
23</n0:dhRecbto><n0:nProt>135110165537480</n0:nProt><n0:digVal>MDu7KXOi87tyBtQHn
/dWAicxWmw=</n0:digVal><n0:cStat>100</n0:cStat><n0:xMotivo>Autorizado o uso da N
F-e</n0:xMotivo></n0:infProt></TProtNFe>
Nesse ponto é chamado um XSLT Transformation (/1SAI/TAS34E3243F19E32E8FEB0A) que eu acredito ser gerado automaticamente pelo sitema para a estrutura /XNFE/006_TPROT_NFE, e nesse ambiente além de ter o código muito pequeno se comparado com o de outro cliente ainda acusa erros quando executada a verificação de sintaxe. Não encontrei como, é possível regerar esse cara? Dando uma olhada no conteúdo do SP 17 e 18 do GRC NFe não encontrei nenhuma nota que altere esse cara por isso acredito que mesmo aplicando continuarei com o problema.
O ambiente em questão é 702, será que pode ser algum tipo de incompatibilidade com o GRC?
Dados do ambiente:
SAP_BASIS     702     0006     SAPKB70206
PI_BASIS             702     0006     SAPK-70206INPIBASIS
SLL-NFE          100     0016     SAPK-10016INSLLNFE
Att.
Marcelo

Include art board images in packaged Links folder

Is there a way to include the images placed on the art board in the packaged Links folder? Meaning include all the images when packaging not just the ones in the document.
Here's my weird workflow as well. Maybe someone could suggest a change that would improve the process.
1- designers lay out editorial features not knowing if the images will land on color or B/W pages (dont ask — I wish I could change this).
2- color images are placed in the layout but b/w versions are placed on the art board — directly left or right of the page containing the color version.
3- features can sit for days until ready for pagination.
4- production artists paginate the pages after ad-logs are complete.
5- images in editorial content are swapped, when needed, to b/w — placing the original color images onto the art board.
6- features are packaged for delivery to a web production team which copies and pastes the text and images into web templates.
6a- If color images are swapped for b/w during print pagination and the article packaged they will not be available for the web production department.
I have joined a stubborn team that I finally convinced to move from Quark 4... but they can not let go of this art board process. Any suggestions, comments or feedback is greatly appreciated.

mckayk_777 wrote:
Just a thought.
Increase the size of the sludge to include the images and see if they are taken when packaged then
I believe tha answer to that is no, but Packaging DOES pick up anything that touches the bleed area. This mans defining a large bleed gives you a lot of space on the pastebaord that will potentially be included in the package, but it also means that using the bleed guides and document bleed settings in the print and export dialogs is no longer valid, a small inconvenience since you can easily add a new set of ruler guides for the bleed and define bleed dimensions in the dialogs.
Or get REALLY sneaky and define the bleed as huge, then define the slug as the size you would use for the bleed. When you print or export, don't set a bleed, but include the slug area. The big downside to this is that the bleed area is included in the view when you fit spread or fit page in window.

DEVOLUÇÃO DE EXPORTAÇÃO - CFOP 3201 - GRC VALIDA DADOS DI.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for