Difference between using the Enterprise Portal and SAP GUI

Hi Gurus,
Could one of you please send me a document that lists the differences between the Enterprise Portal and SAP GUI?
thanks in advance

Hi,
For groups, managedBy is an administrative convenience to designate “group admins”. Whatever principal listed in
managedBy gets permission to update a group’s membership (the actual security is updated on the group’s AD object to allow this).
In Win2008 and later managedBy also became the way you delegated local administration on an RODC, allowing branch admins to install patches, manage shares, etc. (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc755310(WS.10).aspx).
On the RODC, this is updating the RepairAdmin registry value within RODCRoles.
So the difference between them should be only the way they do the same thing.
For more details, please refer to the below article:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2011/06/24/friday-mail-sack-wahoo-edition.aspx
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Similar Messages

What is the difference between using the command "dsmgmt" and the "Managed By" tab when adding users to the local administrators Account on a Read-Only Domain Controller?

When I use the
"dsmgmt" command to add a user to the local administrators account of a RODC I can actually see the user when I use the "Show Role Administrators" parameter. However, I can't see the members of the
group added to the "Managed By" tab of the RODC object in AD. Even though, the users added using
"dsmgmt" and by the "Managed By" tab can all log in locally and have admin rights to the RODC. Are there any differences between these two ways of adding users to the local administrators account?

Hi,
For groups, managedBy is an administrative convenience to designate “group admins”. Whatever principal listed in
managedBy gets permission to update a group’s membership (the actual security is updated on the group’s AD object to allow this).
In Win2008 and later managedBy also became the way you delegated local administration on an RODC, allowing branch admins to install patches, manage shares, etc. (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc755310(WS.10).aspx).
On the RODC, this is updating the RepairAdmin registry value within RODCRoles.
So the difference between them should be only the way they do the same thing.
For more details, please refer to the below article:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2011/06/24/friday-mail-sack-wahoo-edition.aspx
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Use HCM processes and Forms without using the Enterprise Portal

is it possible to leverage existing HR Admin Services (HCM processes and Forms) functionality without using the Enterprise Portal?
1) Create an Adobe form and Interface using SFP
2) Set up ISR and Form Scenario
3) Set up Forms configuration to use existing Backend and generic Services
4) Set up workflow to updated Backend using Services
is it possible to do the above steps and not use the Portal? If Yes, how do we present the forms to the Manager, and provide different buttons that appears on the Portal by default?
Any ideas will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Saurabh

Hi Saurabh,
your assumptions and findings (items can not be started from the backend workflow inbox etc.) are correct: These processes can not be started without the Portal and it is not intended to do this.
The above mentioned backend report are only forseen for implementation and testing purposes and not for productive use.
In addition to the fact, that you already can't execute the work items a lot of other features of the framework (Process Browser etc.) are only available through the Portal.
Best Regards
Michael Bonrat - Solution Manager HCM Processes and Forms
Info about HCM Processes and Forms:
www.service.sap.com/erp:
- SAP ERP Human Capital Management -> Workforce Process Management -> HCM Processes and Forms

What are the differences between SAPR/3 4,7EE and SAP ECC 6.0

Hi All,
Can you provide me any doc/info, which provides the differences between SAPR/3 4,7EE and SAP ECC 6.0
Regds
Raj

hi Rajesh,
Difference between sapr/3 4.7 and sapr/3 ecc 5.0:
See https://sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/uuid/a7455fd8-0301-001
All details can be found at http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000497320&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000112&_O
Regards,
santosh

Create the user master records using the Enterprise Portal

Hello gurus!!
I'm configuring SRM 7.0 with EP.
I'm configuring the organizational structure, and steps guide (pdf and Solution Manager ) are:
1. Go to transaction SU01 and create an ABAP User. (SRMADMIN)
2. Assign this user the administrator role /SAPSRM/ADMINISTRATOR
3. As the administrator, creater the organizational plan
4. Create the remaining organizational unit
5. Using the Enterprise Portal application, Business Parter:Employee, create the user master records for the departmental managers.
How I must create the user in Enterprise Portal? What user I have to use to log on in the Enterprise Portal application? Has the user to be integrated in the organzational structure??
Thanks in advance!!!!
Best regards.
Maria.

Hi,
You can create users in WebDynpro application. You can also create users in USERS_GEN transaction.
Regards,
Masa

Difference between use of decision table and if/then in business rules

Hello ,
Could some one please explain me difference between use of decision table and if/then in business rules in short.
- Shirish

Hi,
They are equivalent, pretty much what you can do with a decision table you can also do with if/then...
However, decision tables provide automated features that can reduce the number of required rules, as compared to the if/then rules (this is called rule coalescing).
Have a look on this document... Search for 5.1.1 What is a Decision Table?
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/user.1111/e10228/decision.htm#CJHFIAHG
Cheers,
Vlad

Differences between showing smartform in Portal and Backend

Hi SAP Experts,
we have developed a smartform which should be opened by clicking on a button integrated in a BSP-Application. All seems to be ok except for one little piece of text that is not shown (Exactly, the text is a calculated value).
We tested the same smart form in backend-system and there the text is shown. There are no problems.
So is there a difference between showing the same smartform in enterprise portal at the one hand and in sap backend at the other hand?
Best Regards,
Nadin
Systems/Software:
Adobe Reader 8
EP 7.0 SP 13
SAP ERP 2005

hi,
what is the link between customised fields in EBP or R3 to portal.
can you explain on this?

Are there any difference between fx. the Nvidia FX3800 and GTX 260?

Does anybody understand why I fell frustrated and confused about all this videocard discussions?
Some tells me that the FX3800 is a better card - more pro - stabillity etc. than low-price cards - like GTX 260/285/295 - and some tells me that GTX 260 = FX3800. I read on other webpages about how people are having problems having their GTX 260 recognized as a FX 3800 (not in PPro but by Nvidia software). Other places tells about how to softmod GTX 260 to a FX 3800. Some tells me that there is a big difference between these cards - others they are almost alike - same GPU etc. I read that the difference between GTX 260 and FX 3800 is only the looks of it from outside - inside they are alike - and that apart from that only drivers are different.
I have ordered the FX 3800 - believing it will perform better and more stable and give me really good playback rendering inside PPro CS5 compared to my GTX 260. If I get the same performance and stability by just changing two lines in a textfile with my old GTX 260 I feel cheated...I hope this is not happening.
Someone from Adobe or Nvidida - please tell us - what there is a differnece between fx. the GTX 260 and the FX 3800 besides from the outside look and some drivers? If there is no difference between them - I can not see any other reason for only supporting the FX cards than $$$...If there are a difference in Quadra/FX favour - and I sincerly hope so - I understand why you choose Quadro cards - but if they are just alike inside - I just feel we have all been mislead. I could have saved my money...time will show - I get the FX 3800 in a few days...can´t return it (danish rules when you buy it as a company) - so I´m 1000$ short this month...:(
I would feel much more comfortable in having ordered the FX 3800 if someone from Adobe could tell me excactly how much better FX 3800 is from the GTX 260 - apart from being supported and the GTX is not. And if there is more in it than just changing a simple textfile? Are there any more things going on inside PPro - deep inside - that affects performance with FX cards besides from two lines in a textfile? Who can help answering that question - and I mean really answering it in serious way - not just saying - off course the FX is better - because its more expenssive.
Haven´t we all experienced this in other situations? Like buying a car? Fx. Inside SKODA FABIA is a VW engine like the ones used in much more expensive VW cars. Only difference is the name and the outside look - and some comfort. The engine is the same - and in a way you could say that from an engine-point-of-view - the cars are alike. But you pay for comfort.
Is the same thing going on here? I pay more for FX 3800 for the looks of it from the outside and some software-drivers that makes it more stable - but inside it is just like GTX 260? So from a graphic-performance-GPU-point-of-view I actually have two cards that are alike and I reaaly am paying for software and not hardware?
/Morten

You are right -. and I keep spanking myself in the head with a wet towel.
I will lie in my bed - thinking of the nice new bicycle I could have bought instead of the FX 3800....;-)
No seriously - I know what I have done - and maybe I have done right - I don´t know? Time will show and I will sell or buy.
What I am frustrated about is the fact that I actually just decided to buy FX 3800 because Adobe and Nvidida toold me too - to get support for MPE and now it seems that my old GTX 260 is much like the FX 3800 if not the same inside? And I am frustrated about that it is possible to change a line in a simple textfile and suddenly get support for the GTX 260 to play MPE. This fact only put more lit on the conspiracy-fire about Adobe and Nvidia having made a simple software-trick to make some cards work others not = making a lot of money on fools like me...
You must admitt it is a rather tempting conclusion - if one is in the conspiracy-mood. Well - I try to think good about people. And Adobe convinced me at last that I needed the FX 3800 card. So I did order it eventually - because I need the MPE NOW - Can´t wait - having so bad performance and issues with PPro 4 - been so frustrated about edditting for almost ½ a year now - constantly having issues etc. And I am going to start new big project in 7 days. Have just spend 2000$ on upgrade to Master Collection and have making thoughts about wich card to buy long time ago - the GTX 285 or FX 3800 - to get the MPE support. And same day I order I suddenly see that the softmod makes my old GTX 260 to a FX 3800. And other posts claim that the cards are the same inside. No wonder I get frustrated - others must be the same.
So what I am trying to say is that: I feel like Adobe and Nvidida is not being honest with us. If it turns out that the only thing Adobe has done is making a simple textfile to make cards supported or not by enteringior changing the names of the cards inside the textfile - and nothing else....And if fx. a softmoded GTX 260 turns out to perform excactly the same and be as stable as a FX 3800 to 5-6 x the price - I will feel cheated and feel like a stupid fool.
I certainly do not hope this is what is going on. But it seems no one can help me but myself - testing and trying these cards - and I will try to post my results in this forum - so others might have easier tomake a choice...
I´l be back....
Cheers

Difference between closing the connection before and after committing user transaction?

          I was wondering what's the difference between closing the connection before committing
          the transaction versus closing the connection after committing the transaction?...
          for e.g....
          Scenario 1.........
          UserTransaction useretran;
          usertran.begin();
          Connection con = datasource.getCOnnection();
          // do bunch of stuff...
          conn.close();
          usertran.commit()
          Scenario 2...
          UserTransaction useretran;
          usertran.begin();
          Connection con = datasource.getCOnnection();
          // do bunch of stuff...
          usertran.commit()
          conn.close();
          thanks....
          Srini


Hi. As long as you're sure there's a transaction going on, and the connection
is a transaction-aware object (from a TxDataSource), either will be fine.
In the first scenario the actual semantics of the close() call are less than
normal, because we really don't close the connection or return it to the
pool until the actual transaction commits, and in the second case, we have
already taken the connection out of your service as of the commit().
The second scenario is the usual coding style. If there's ever a chance your
code will get non-transaction-aware connections, it is crucial to close
connections, and I always recommend putting the close() in a finally block
so it's guaranteed to happen.
Joe
srinivas wrote:
I was wondering what's the difference between closing the connection before committing
the transaction versus closing the connection after committing the transaction?...
for e.g....
Scenario 1......... UserTransaction useretran; usertran.begin(); Connection con =
datasource.getCOnnection(); // do bunch of stuff... conn.close(); usertran.commit()
Scenario 2... UserTransaction useretran; usertran.begin(); Connection con = datasource.getCOnnection();
// do bunch of stuff... usertran.commit() conn.close();
thanks....
Srini

What's the difference between using a connection pool and a datasource

Howdy. I figure this is a newbie question, but I can't seem to find an
answer.
In the docs at bea, the datasource docs say
"DataSource objects provide a way for JDBC clients to obtain a DBMS
connection. A DataSource is an interface between the client program and the
connection pool. Each data source requires a separate DataSource object,
which may be implemented as a DataSource class that supports either
connection pooling or distributed transactions."
In there it says the datasource uses the connection pool, but other than
that, what is the difference between a connection pool and a datasource?

Thanks for the info. I think it makes some sense. But it's a bit greek.
I'm sure it'll make more sense the more I work with it. Thanks.
"Chuck Nelson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3dcac1f5$[email protected]..
>
Peter,
Here is a more formal definition of a DataSource from the Sun site
"A factory for connections to the physical data source that thisDataSource object
represents. An alternative to the DriverManager facility, a DataSourceobject
is the preferred means of getting a connection. An object that implementsthe
DataSource interface will typically be registered with a naming servicebased
on the JavaTM Naming and Directory (JNDI) API.
The DataSource interface is implemented by a driver vendor. There arethree types
of implementations:
Basic implementation -- produces a standard Connection object
Connection pooling implementation -- produces a Connection object thatwill automatically
participate in connection pooling. This implementation works with amiddle-tier
connection pooling manager.
Distributed transaction implementation -- produces a Connection objectthat may
be used for distributed transactions and almost always participates inconnection
pooling. This implementation works with a middle-tier transaction managerand
almost always with a connection pooling manager.
Does that help clarify the distinction?
Chuck Nelson
DRE
BEA Technical Support

Differences between using a Object Reference and the Object itself

Example:
public class Myclass
//difference between
Myclass myobj;
//and
Myclass myobj = new Myclass();
can anyone help me?

Both lines you showed declare an object reference.
The first one is not explictely assigned a value and
is thus implicetly assigned the null reference (= a
reference pointing to no object). The latter is
initialized with an reference to the newly created
Object (new Myclass()).
They're both given a value of null first.
The second one is then given a value that points to that object that was created.
If they were inside a method, then the first one's value would be undefined.

What is difference between using interface as source and table as source?

I am working on a batch flow which need several steps to populate data from source to target. For example, I need 5 interfaces to finish final data loading. I can either use interface or use temporary table as source and target for the interface 2, 3, and 4. It looks like both case will use tables no matter use interface or use temporary table. So my question is if there is any difference between these two (using interface as source or use temporary table as source)?
Thanks

if you use a Table as source for the intermediate process, it will create a physical temporary table i your work rep(depends on you choice) and populate the data into the table. if you use a interface as a source, just it will create a sub query instead of temporary table.
Thanks
nidhi

No difference between using a local variable and a notifier in timed parallel loops?

The example code "Pass Data With Notifiers.vi" that came with LV 7.1 illustrates using notifiers with parallel loops. Just looking at two of the loops, the one that generates the sine wave and the one for "User 1", you can change the timing of the two loops and you can change the condition of the "Ignore Previous" status on the "Wait on Notification". I have a special case of this to consider, where I'm wondering if there's any reason not to use a local variable instead of the notifier:
Set the delay on the generator portion (which contains the Send Notification) to something very short, say 5 ms. Set the delay on the User 1 (which contains the Wait on Notification) to something relatively longer, say 200 ms. Set the Wait on Notification to False. Now you have a situation where the User 1 loop action is contingent only upon the loop delay time, since each time the loop timer runs the loop there will always be a value in the notifier. In this case it seems to behave just like the case where you update a local variable in the fast loop and read it in the slow one.
Is my understanding correct? Would there be a performance difference between the two methods? What do you prefer in this situation and why?
Thanks,
Hosehead

Hi H.,
I think your idea is to write to a Global Variable in the data-producer VI, and read it in the data-consumer VI(?)
One reason this might be less efficient than using Notifiers is if you want to graph every new value in the "consumer" - or make sure the value read in the consumer has changed at least once since the last loop.
> since each time the [consumer] loop timer runs the loop there will always be a value in the notifier...
> Would there be a performance difference between the two methods?
If you don't use the Notification "event" to synchronize the producer and consumer, then to be sure the consumer gets a new vaue, you've made the producer loop faster - every 5 ms - a waste of cpu-cycles. More often the situation is reversed, that is, there's a consumer that needs to see every single new value, and (without events) the consumer must loop faster than the producer (to catch every new value) - this is called polling and it wastes cpu-cycles.
Just about anytime one's tempted to make a loop execute "fast" to check on some value (or to make sure there's a fresh value,) there's an opportunity to improve performance through synchronization with events (including notifiers, queues, occurrances, semaphores, and rendezvous')
tbd
Message Edited by tbd on 07-09-2006 03:51 AM
"Inside every large program is a small program struggling to get out." (attributed to Tony Hoare)

What's the differences between connectors the old ones and newest ones?

i developed an application with tomcat jakarta 5.1-mysql-java servlets, and i had been using the mysql-connector-java-3.1.8-bin.jar connector a little old uh, my question is what is the differences between the last mencionated and this version mysql-connector-java-5.0.0-beta-bin.jar, you say "just the version", i mean, i know there are many changes in the new ones but i don't like the idea to change all my application, and i would like to know what changes i have to do for update and compiling with them. i.e. i always did it like this:
import java.sql.*;
public class MultiUsos {
private final static String log = "x";
private final static String pswd = "x";
private final static String Bd = "x";
private final static String URL = "jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/"+Bd;
private Connection con = null;
private ResultSet rs = null;
private Statement stmt = null;
private Conexion conexion = null;
public int insert(String query) throws SQLException {
try {
con = conexion.getConexion(URL,log,pswd);
con.setAutoCommit(false);
if(con != null) {
stmt = con.createStatement();
r = stmt.executeUpdate(query);
stmt.close();
else System.out.print("� No existe conexion !");
catch(SQLException e) {
System.out.print("Error MySQL: ");
e.printStackTrace();
r = 0;
return r;
con.commit();
return r;
public void liberaConexion() {
try {
stmt.close();
con.commit();
con.close();
catch(Exception e) {
and i looked this example in new connectors:
PreparedStatement pstmt = connection.prepareStatement("insert into......
and things like that, i don't know if there were the same method in the older versions but if this is exclusive new for connectors, i'm fried.
i will apreciate all comments and help, and sorry about my not good english.
thanks.

and i looked this example in new connectors:
PreparedStatement pstmt =
connection.prepareStatement("insert into......
and things like that, i don't know if there were the
same method in the older versions but if this is
exclusive new for connectors, i'm fried.I am not sure if I understood your problem correctly but as I understand, you are worried because of the examples of PreparedStatement. That is an object representing a precompiled SQL statement. It is a part of the JDBC API, the same as Statement. There are several situations where the use of PreparedStatement is better than the usual Statement but this does not make the Statement obsolete.
I would suggest you to read the JDBC tutorial
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jdbc/
especially the section dealing with the use of PreparedStatement.
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jdbc/basics/prepared.html
In general, it is better if you go through the complete tutorial and understand the features which are provided in the JDBC API.
Hope I was helpful.

Difference between HP's QC, QTP and SAP's Solman Test Management and eCATT

Can you help me to get a comparison documents in the following 2 aspects:
1. Difference between QTP and eCATT testing tools.
2. Difference between Test Management in HP's QC and SAP Solman Test Management.
Appreciate a quick response.

Hi,
Check [this guide|https://websmp110.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700000213552006E/TESTING_WITH_SOLMAN40_V11.PDF]
This will give you a very good idea about eCATT and Testing with Solution Manager.
Feel free to revert back.
--Ragu

Difference between using the Enterprise Portal and SAP GUI

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for