Dirty deeds done dirt cheap: C# in a weekend

What's this? A C# question in a Java forum? Now, now, before you stoke up the flames of discontent and sharpen the pitchforks, let me explain.
The powers that be, those that take a firm hold of my professional leash, have decided that any web apps to be deployed on a windows box will now need to be developed in C# (this despite having a tomcat servlet container running with a struts application on said box).
So, as a (somewhat) competent developer, I'm faced with learning C# to accomodate these strange whims. That's great, it adds a string to my bow and I can't complain about that.
I've looked at two C# books so far. The first was a primer that really ran through the core syntax. I'm happy with that and I can use that as a simple language reference. The second took a real Janet and John approach - going back to equating C# code with algebra (but with semi-colons...).
Can anyone here recommend good learning aids for a Java developer trying to pick up C#? What I did find missing in the books I have so far used was discussions around Java packages vs C# namespaces, Jars vs Assemblies etc.
I'm really looking for a focus on web applications and using C# in same sort of role as servlets (presumably with some form of ASP.NET in place of JSP).
Any help welcome.
Thanks.

Thanks for that. I'd looked around on the MSDN site
but that cut straight through for me.
I still didn't pick up on there about using C# in a
web development environment though. I get the
impression that ASP.NET actually IS their
architecture and it just picks up and uses whatever
compiled resources it needs at run time. Is this an
accurate picture?.NET is the architecture/platform comparable to J2EE. ASP is a server-side scripting technology in .NET just like JSPs are used in J2EE.
I never worked with ASP .NET but I had read this once.
http://www.w3schools.com/aspnet/default.asp
It is quite good for getting started. MSDN has several resources and a few online books.
It's getting off the Java-related "what's a good
Java-centric learning source" I know but I'm trying
to bridge the gap between my Java architecture
experience and .NET.Here's one for an introduction to .NET (in comparison to J2EE)
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-06-2002/jw-0628-j2eevsnet-p2.html

Similar Messages

  • Dirty Deeds by AC/DC won't play!

    I downloaded "Dirty Deeds" by AC/DC and it won't play.  It appears in my library and starts to play, but then it doesn't.

    Hey! Welcome to the community :) 
    It sounds like you might be having a play queue issue, try the steps outlined in this tutorial see if they help you out.
    Peter

  • Itunes 11 autostart without user access....and other dirty deeds....

    It *****,
    iTunes 11.1.2 always autostarts and plays music after a while.
    killall iTunes helps. For about 5 minutes or so.
    Magic Trackpad stops. Mouse pointer hangs. The only way is to disconnecting and reconnecting the Pad.
    I think there are Bluetooth problems with Mavericks.
    Hope there will be updates this month.

    Well done Apple!!!!
    I thought the problem was with the itunes 11.4 update, because after updating all devices where giving me the problems, but now we have updated our Iphone 4S to version 8.0.2 and this one has been connected to the itunes, found all devices showing there normal storage capacity again

  • I had a data migration done from old iMac to new iMac, how do I use that file to find my old email contacts, Safari bookmarks, etc ?

    I recently had a data migration from old iMac to new iMac 11.2
    How do I use that data file to get old email contacts, Safari bookmarks, etc ?

    FireWire cables are dirt cheap and that's how you should be doing the migration. You might have to start over, wiping the new machine's HD, and restoring the software as described in the Everything Mac manual that came with it. See Best Practices and Setup new Mac for more details.

  • I have an iMac and cannot add Logitech x-540 speakers. I found really cheap in the classifieds, so would like to make them "go".

    As in the header; I have an iMac and cannot add Logitech x-540 speakers.
    I found them dirt cheap on kijiji, $40, so want to keep them.
    I read a couple different ideas but was wondering if anyone has a definitive best solution, cost-effective?
    Thanks very much,
    Wayno1283

    Howdy Wayno. I looked directly to the right of your post and see plug adaptor.. that sounds like it

  • Aperture 3 and Time Machine don't work well together

    I've noticed that my Time Machine (10.6.2) creates large backups (at least 250 MB) when I've only opened up Aperture 3. No retouching, no adding of photo's (of course), no changes. Just opening Aperture and a bit of scrolling.
    Is there a way to prevent this? Is Time Machine perhaps backing up a cache? Where would I find this cache so I could perhaps exclude it from the TM?
    Thanks !

    the main idea of time machine is being able to restore your system to its latest state, or any state in time when it made a backup. in order to be able to do this, it just has to backup any file that's been changed, even if it's just a database having been touched by sqlite3. aperture 3 now saves the way you were viewing or where you were in a certain album or project, so when you come back to it, it takes you to exactly the same place. i guess it's necessary to write to a couple of database files to do that, even when you're just browsing. i kind of like this functionality.
    just three quick comments:
    -disk space is dirt cheap nowadays, so getting a big time machine backup disk shouldn't be any problem.
    -since getting previous versions of your aperture library back is usually not very likely to happen, what i do from time to time is go in to time machine, select my aperture library and delete all copies of it. this takes quite some time, but on the next backup, you'll have your current library backed up and a time machine volume with more space.
    -about it taking too long over wifi: backing up is a background process. does it slow down your other stuff while you're working? if so, let it run only when you're not at the computer, or hook up a big usb disk locally.
    j

  • Can I remove a specific dated backup from time Capsule?

    Sorry for the long story - but I have tried to provide as much detail as possible as to what is going on...
    Sadly Lion has been a royal pain in the perverbial for me. It is slow (on a Macbook pro that is still within its warranty period so I don't believe that Hardware can be blamed - especially with upgraded ram and a 7200rpm drive) I recently got so frustrated with its clunkyness that I tried reinstalling on a new HDD and booting off that. Showed improvement (clean install vs upgraded and less apps etc slowing down the OS - however it is nowhere near what Snow Leopard was). But while I was at it I did something stupid. In hindsight very stupid - but balls to Apple for putting me in this situation and balls to Apple for letting me do it with no warning about the consequences...
    I connected my old HDD via firewire and tried to access my files that are on it - I couldn't initially as my newly installed user did not have permission. Easy - Add the new user to permissions for folder concerned - apply to enclosed - done - Achieved what I wanted. Files accessed - test complete - sadly I will have to reinstall a clean lion and transfer my files over (restore from time capsule).
    Two Major problems have surfaced. The first is directly related to the topic, the second I might try to repost in an appropriate section...
    1) What I didn't think about is as soon as I modified the permissions Time Capsule treats all the files in that folder as being modified. So it has backed up an entire new version of every file in that folder - a few hundred GB. That has chomped out 10-20% of my Time Capsule. I have no need for these backups and want to delete - say - every back up made since last Sunday when I committed the dirty deed. Seems minor - but this is a major compromise to my current arrangement.
    2) I have MAJOR permissions issues now. Firstly my Aperture library (which was in the folder with added user in the permissions) is fried. Can't be repaired/rebuild or anything. Lion wont do anything so useful as to tell me why - just get the colourwheel of death and the aperture library NEVER opens. Balls to Apple for allowing this to happen so easily. Second I tried to restore the entire pictures folder from Time Machine. It tells me I don't have permission??? WHAT. Double Balls. These are my freakin files - created by this user on this MBP on this install of Lion. I can't see how adding a user can suddenly prevent a long standing user from accessing their files from within their account. By the way the new install on the new HDD is no longer in play - all I am trying to do is continue to use my MBP the way I was before I did the test install.
    My long running affinity for Mac is rapidly waning - I have wasted countless hours trying to regain access to ALL of my pictures - 14 years worth. 1000's of images. I cannot access them on my MBP, Can't restore them from Time Machine. This is the worst computing experience of my life.
    I have tried booting from recovery, repairing permissions etc etc etc. Nothing mainstream solves this.
    Does anyone have some wisdom to address my conundrum - I am seriously desperate here... I have genuinely decided that I will not waste the upcoming long weekend ******* around with this - I would rather forget my 14 years of stored memories and just get on with life... If unsolved by this Friday I will sell my Macbook Pro and iPad and initiate my own version of the post PC world - no computer at all - currently it is doing nothing but wasting my time.

    jameski wrote:
    My only concern about resetting premissions (and ACL???) is that it will exacerbate my backup disk space wastage issue as it will result in full backup of my entire home folder (about 400GB).
    Yup, if you changed the permissions on everything in your home folder, that will change them all back, so they'll all be backed-up again. 
    That will leave me with about 1.2TB of a 2TB TC used up with backups (currently should be about 500GB) - my plan was to have about 1.5TB of my TC available to use for files in the medium term until the need for more backup space pushed me to invest in another drive. TC's are just too expensive to waste like this.
    Mixing backups and other data on the TC's internal HD will, eventually, cause conflicts.  But see #Q3 in Using Time Machine with a Time Capsule for some possible workarounds.
    If I do a complete restore from TM (entire account)
    You can't do that.   You can't restore an entire home folder via the "Star Wars" display, because the home folder and default sub-folders (Desktop, Downloads, Pictures, etc.,) are protected.  You'd have to restore the contents of the sub-folders, a rather tedious process. 
    You can do a "full system restore" (OSX, apps, all user accounts & home folders), via a different procedure (Time Machine - Frequently Asked Question #14).
    to the day before this shambles started - will time machine treat my restored account as a modification of all files and try to back up a fresh copy of everything on the basis that it has been modified - or is it smart enought to realise what I have done and carry on doing only incremental backups?
    Anything you restore via the "Star Wars" display is considered as changed, so will be backed-up.
    A full system restore (usually) results in only an incremental backup, but TM does a "deep scan" to compare everything on your system to the backups, to see what's different.  That will find that everything in your home folder has changed, so back it all up anyway.
    If yes I will likely put all my historical backups onto a cheap 500GB drive and put it in a drawer and start new backups on TC
    Good plan.   You probably know you can always view and restore from those, via the Browse Other Backup Disks option, per #17 in the FAQ.
    After you do that, in theory, you could run the user home folder permissions reset, delete all the backups made after the original permissions change, then force a "deep scan" so the only differences found would be files that really are new or changed; but that's tedious, error-prone, and "iffy."
    Are backups via TC inherently substantially slower than say to firewire drive?
    Oh, yes, absolutely.  Here's a very rough comparison of full backup speeds (see #29 in the FAQ for details):
    There's a lot of variation depending on your hardware and setup, of course.
    I am running my TC through gigabit ethernet as wifi (despite having an ethernet extended AEP in my office) is too slow. I simply cannot get over the serious loss of performance since Lion and more recently the introduction of a TC. It is dire!
    Some folks report WIFI backups slower under Lion vs. Snow Leopard, some think it's faster, others (including me) don't see much difference. 
    However, it really shouldn't make a whole lot of difference for normal incremental backups, as they should be relatively small and quick in most cases, and shouldn't have much impact on performance.  You might want to check the sizes of your backups -- if they seem too large considering what you've changed, see #D4 in Time Machine - Troubleshooting.  If the sizes are reasonable, but the backups are still slow, or other performance seems to suffer, see #D2 there.
    Are these your only backups?  If so, consider keeping "secondary" backups, to avoid having "all eggs in one basket."  See #27 in the FAQ for some suggestions.

  • HT1338 just what is the new software upgrade 10S 6.16. EVERY TIME I PUT NEW SOFT WARE ON MY IPOD 4TH GENERATION TOUCH IT MESSES UP MY IPOD IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. USUALLY IT CUTS IT OFF OF WI FI AND IT WON'T CONNECT!FI

    I am afraid to download the new update software ios 6.1.6. Because everytime I let it put new software on, It makes my Ipod 4th generation mess up one way or another. Usually it makes the wifi go off and I cannot get it back on. Then I can't even use the ipod!  I am having a problem now with it shuffling. Do both red x's one on each corner right top and left top need to be on for it to shuffle?  Thank-You; Sherry  PS, I do not have a Mac. I have a dell window 7. and I don't want windows 8. I have heard nothing but bad about it!

    Nope, though it did allow me to get some missing songs back onto my iPod. That's something. But neither "Back in Black" or "Dirty Deeds" show up anywhere on the Touch. Could this be because iTunes has no deal with AC/DC?
    Quite frankly, at this point, I'd really rather not have the "ease of use" of iCloud attached to the iPod. It's not like I change my playlists that much. It would just be nice to get what I want onto my MP3 player. Not sure which one it was: iCloud, Music Match or the Air Port but the only real result of all the $ I plunked down is seeing all of my Wife's 231 Christmas songs popping up on my laptop. Really don't want them here. She SURE AS **** is sick of seeing all of my stuff on her computer.
    Thanks again.
    B.

  • If this is "A Whole New Program" then dont call it FINAL CUT!!!

    I cant believe that some of you are actually defending this product.  I have been an editor for nearly two decades.  I have used nearly every platform out there. I have used Final Cut since the week it came out.   FCPx is fast...great!  It can only do about half of what I need it to do but the other half is pretty fast???   This is the equivalent of Adobe making a new version of Photoshop that cant open earlier psd files and is incapable of opening a tiff or jpeg,  "Oh, but it's fast and it has a great new layout!!!"
    The dilemma is that "Pro" Final Cut users have all been anticipating this new version of FCP.   Pro editors were expecting it to be able to do "at least" what it was capable of doing in the past, and hopefully much more.  Afterall, it was called "FINAL CUT PRO".  But it cannot import a Final Cut project.  It can import an imovie project.  Isn't imovie a free app for editing vacation videos and kids birthday parties?   "Hmmmm, maybe we should reconsider the name.  Many pro users will think this can do what the old version can do."
    Those of you that are defending this "app" are probably young and inexperienced when it comes to real world editing.   "Pro" editors depend on their editing platform for their livelihood.  I'm sure that those of you that live with your parents and just got your new white macbook for college are probably loving this new "app".   If you are editing your hot new blog for youtube, FCPx is probably just what you need.
    I am not opposed to learning new ways of editing at all!!  I was excited about learning the new language of Final Cut.  I was excited about the new look and feel. It does look kinda cool.  BUT, I dont get paid for how cool and fast my "app" is.  I get paid for what I can do with Final Cut. 
    With FCPX, you can do less, period!!!  Do not even try to argue that point. 
    I will be sticking with FCP7 or Premiere.  And I hope that Apple refunds my money. 

    Nope, though it did allow me to get some missing songs back onto my iPod. That's something. But neither "Back in Black" or "Dirty Deeds" show up anywhere on the Touch. Could this be because iTunes has no deal with AC/DC?
    Quite frankly, at this point, I'd really rather not have the "ease of use" of iCloud attached to the iPod. It's not like I change my playlists that much. It would just be nice to get what I want onto my MP3 player. Not sure which one it was: iCloud, Music Match or the Air Port but the only real result of all the $ I plunked down is seeing all of my Wife's 231 Christmas songs popping up on my laptop. Really don't want them here. She SURE AS **** is sick of seeing all of my stuff on her computer.
    Thanks again.
    B.

  • Not sure if this is a iCloud or Wi-fi issue. Why can't I put my new playlists onto my iPod Touch?

    Hello!
       A month or so ago, I bought a new MacBook Pro for myself, an iMac for the wife, a 2TB TimeCapsule iCloud and  Music Match. The whole 9 yards. Since then, I have't been able to put new playlists onto my iPod Touch. When I plug it in and switch to the "Music" tab for the iPod, I get " iTunes Match is On. Brian's Newest iPod can access music in iCloud. Songs can be downloaded and played via Wi-Fi or a cellular network."
    Well, no I can't. The reason I know this is because yesterday, I was given two brand new music CDs, which I uploaded onto the MacBook Pro. Made a new "AC/DC" playlist and everthing. And now I can't get this playlist or any new playlist onto my Pod. Looking for "AC/DC" under the "Artist" tab or "Back in Black" on my iPod does't work either.
    This is Gawd-Awful annoying. I don't WANT to play everything from Wi-Fi or cellular network. (Don't need/want an iPhone-that shouldn't count again me, should it?) The whole point of buying a 32 GB iPod was because I am usually not on a network of any type during most of my day. How do I get the stinkin' music onto it?
    Maybe I am missing the point of both iCloud and Music Match. I thought the second allowed me to download better versions of all the songs I have on my computers. (Was that payment a one-time thing or will I have to pony up each year, btw?) And iCloud meant that I could listen to any and all of my songs on anything with an Apple Logo on it via wi-fi. But is that the only way?
    Okay, done ranting now.
    Thanks.
    Brian

    Nope, though it did allow me to get some missing songs back onto my iPod. That's something. But neither "Back in Black" or "Dirty Deeds" show up anywhere on the Touch. Could this be because iTunes has no deal with AC/DC?
    Quite frankly, at this point, I'd really rather not have the "ease of use" of iCloud attached to the iPod. It's not like I change my playlists that much. It would just be nice to get what I want onto my MP3 player. Not sure which one it was: iCloud, Music Match or the Air Port but the only real result of all the $ I plunked down is seeing all of my Wife's 231 Christmas songs popping up on my laptop. Really don't want them here. She SURE AS **** is sick of seeing all of my stuff on her computer.
    Thanks again.
    B.

  • How to make a fullscreen button for Flash Catalyst?

    Hey everyone.  I really hope someone can help me with this.  How can I make a fullscreen button in Flash Professional that would make my Flash Catalyst project go fullscreen?

    I'm sorry I really don't know Flash Catalyst as much as I'd like to. Designing interfaces is left up to me, no designers at my agency use Catalyst. Though this is the Flash forum so that's as much as I can tell you. I didn't know Catalyst didn't support basic scripts (I thought I read that it did).
    Ultimately, for a very cheap price you can do something like go to http://www.lynda.com/ and buy a membership. Dirt cheap compared to what you get. They offer many courses on all this stuff and I'm sure your answer would lie in one of the (nicely broken up by subject) video training videos.
    Just searching for Catalyst brings up a bunch of courses:
    http://www.lynda.com/search?q=catalyst&x=0&y=0
    edit:
    For instance I watched the essential CS5.5 training and I saw in 2 minutes flat that when you click on a button you should have an "Interactions" panel that lets you do things. If they didn't put fullscreen as an interaction that's another thing but I'm just pointing out it's very easy to learn how to do all sorts of things in video training. If you do not want to purchase a membership there just find a video you think would have the info in it and I'll watch it and let you know if it told me how to do it, and how to do it.

  • Mac newbie returns to Windows

    I was really looking forward to kicking Windows into touch. No more virus software, no disk defragging required. Simple Tiger operating system. Fast performance. Throw in a Mac Pro and I should have been full of joy.
    The reality has been pure frustration. I found I had to dual boot to windows to make so many little jobs I do as routine work on the Mac Pro. Boy is Tiger lacking in so many areas. Mac Mail or Entourage are just so dated and frustrating to use. Office 2004 for Mac - well come on guys, does it really have to be that creaky? Compared to the Windows version, and the latest Office 2007, it is really so limited. Can't compress pictures in a document, for example so have to send larger folders with pictures in as a PDF.
    The performance of Adobe Photoshop CS2 for Mac should have been stellar. Nope. Thrashed by CS2 running on my 4-year old IBM Thinkpad laptop; the programme did storm through work in its Windows version on the Mac, but you do not by a Mac to run Windows full time do you?
    Much as I want to join your club it will need a few changes. Like simple, affordable personal finiance software that allows easy migration for MS Money. Or an email programme that allows you to list contacts by first or last names. Or a system that allows you to turn off certain toolbars and keep them turned off. Software that allows simple routeplanning to be made. The ability to run RAW picture conversions without locking up. Safari allowing personal data to be stored, so allowing access to multiple on-line bank finance mangement systems from one site. Support for keyboards that help those with RSI. Ditto with track balls. Or even a few more printer drivers; failure to work 2 out of three of my printers, the oldest of which is 2 years, is not encouraging.
    I could go on. In fact I did - I spent over 50 hours just trying to make a working system of of a Mac and OS.X Tiger operating system. It just could not be done. I even tried doing it the Mac way for five solid days. It was like going back to an abacus.
    All in all I am just so dissappointed. My 2 weeks with an Apple Mac has shown me the grass is not greener on the other side. Windows XP may stink - Vista is too dreadful to even consider - but the Tiger was so tame I won't be coming back.
    Mac Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.10)  
    Mac Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.10)  

    As another Mac newbie I thought I'd share some of my frustrations with OSX, but also why I won’t be returning to windows anytime soon. I've built PC's for almost 7 years, so I know exactly how much flexibility you have in both building and operating a windows PC. I also know the exact definition of compatibility. Thousands of different manufacturers making parts for PCs is a nightmare, if you don’t believe me build a computer, I dare you. Over my years building computers I have pulled out more hair, lost more files, and nearly broke so many parts I prefer to not talk about it. So finally when it was time to upgrade I thought about a Mac. Problem was I wanted a computer that had some flexibility in terms of upgrading. I was absolutely blown away by the cost of powermacs. I could build a new PC, no exaggeration, for well less than half of what a powermac would cost me. Not to mention a powermac g5 was already a generation old. So I caved and bought a dell for dirt cheap, cheaper than even what I could build a PC for. Not only that I thought maybe vista is a savior so I got my new dell with windows vista. Lets just say my brand new computer (I bought the dell in February) ran drastically slower than the nearly 6 year old computer it was replacing. Not to mention I had to go buy a new wireless card, and most of my software didn’t work. Vista looks pretty, actually it looks just like OSX, but it runs terrible unless you have a top-of-the-line computer. Anyway to make a long story short someone on craig’s list was getting rid of their powermac and they needed a new windows PC so we traded. I also recently bought a powerbook g3 so I’m 100 percent Mac now. I’ve been using OSX for a few weeks now and I’ve read some articles on making the switch. I’ve found how incredibly easy OSX is to use and how intuitive many of the features are. There are a few downsides to using a Mac I certainly understand. One is the lack of software support. I regularly use Reference Manager and SPSS, two programs that are unfortunately not supported in OSX. However I normally use these programs at work, so for now I can go without them at home. I suppose there are two other complaints I have about Apple and Macs. I’ve found that first, Macs don’t like non-Apple parts. Buy a third-party anything and you’re in for a headache. Second, what was common knowledge on a PC means nothing on a Mac. Installing an airport card took me more than a day because I didn’t know what I was doing and my mind was still thinking windows. I’ve been frustrated more than a few times with my new Mac, but the problems have been entirely because of my naïve understanding of Macs and OSX. All in All though I completely understand that Macs aren’t for everyone, especially people who use a lot of professional software. For me though the choice is easy, I want a computer that is easy to use, does basic tasks, and for the love of all things holy doesn’t crash and lose my data. Everything after that I will learn to cope with. For these reasons I am sticking it out and learning the full feature set of OSX.

  • Will Graphics Card Help Aperture on Mac Pro?

    I've been using Aperture for many years on a variety of Mac hardware. I have 5 or 6 image libraries, ranging in size from 50gb to 250gb. I have no referenced images, do not use "faces" or other CPU-intensive features, and often perform tasks which reportedly improve Aperture performance (deleting caches, repairing/rebuilding libraries, defragging hard drives. deleting prefs). While these tricks often result in a snappy experience on relaunch, Aperture returns to its sluggish ways after a few minutes of work.
    My workflow is very simple -- I plug in my camera, download photos to the HD, and then edit them, which consists of adjustments such as exposure, white balance, sharpening, rotating, cropping. I don't do much retouching, red eye, or other fancy editing. Occasionally I use the "external" edit feature to retouch in Photoshop. I shot for many years with a Canon Rebel, 14MP I believe, and recently got a Nikon D800. I am finding the performance going through D800 raw files (not even editing, just flipping through them) unacceptable. For example, if I go to hybrid list/preview view, and press the "down" key 10 or 15 times, by the 5th image, there is a very noticeable lag, and often the display beachballs for 10 seconds or more before it gets to the bottom of the list. Basic tasks such as cropping or rotating often lock the display for long periods of time.
    For many years, I blamed Aperture's awful performance on my hardware. I worked on a series of Mac laptops. Although I usually had the latest hardware, they were no desktop. Recently, I bought a Mac Pro with a 3.2GHz Quad-Core Xeon processor, 16GB of ram, an OWC SSD (for the system -- the libraries are on a 7200RPM drive), and a ATI Radeon HD 5770 graphics card. I was dismayed to find out that Aperture is STILL unbearably slow. If I can't simply flip through some photos on a top of the line Mac Pro, what is this program good for?
    My question now is, would I see a significant performance gain if I were to upgrade yet again to a faster graphics card, such as the Radeon 7950? I've been reading up on these cards, and it seems like native support is coming in 10.8.3. While I hesitate to pour more money into my quest for a useable Aperture system, I wonder if this would finally show some significant performance gains. I've read conflicting reports from other users who've upgraded the graphics card. Is the advantage mainly for 3D or gaming applications or would this help Aperture too?
    Thanks in advance for any replies!

    In the past Aperture has been very GPU-dependent. The very best G5 tower would bog on Aperture unless the stock GPU card had been upgraded. I expect current Aperture also to benefit from a stronger GPU but I do not have absolute info on that. And your existing 5770 is not a lame card.
    I know 16 GB RAM seems like a lot, but with D800 files and an Aperture/Photoshop workflow you may still be paging out to disk. My Aperture/Photoshop workflow paged out at 8 GB RAM with files 1/3 the size of the D800 files.
    You should evaluate whether or not you have adequate RAM:
    Look at the Page Outs number under System Memory on the Activity Monitor app before starting a typical Aperture/Photoshop work session and write the number down. Recheck the Page Outs count after working for a few hours and write the number down again. If the page outs change (manual calculation of ending page outs number minus starting page outs number) is not zero your workflow is RAM-starved.
    Ignore the pie charts and other info in Activity Monitor because they are often misleading regarding RAM usage. For RAM analysis, count page outs.
    If your test shows that page outs increase at all during operation you should add RAM. RAM is dirt cheap and use of additional RAM a very desirable characteristic for an Aperture/Photoshop workflow. If it was me I would double to 32 GB RAM and set PS (PS Preferences/Performance/Memory) to use 16 GB of RAM.
    Hard drives slow as they fill so make sure none of your hard drives are overfilled. I suggest 70% full as an arbitrary maximum but even less full is preferable for speed. If your Library drive exceeds 60% full I suggest setting a RAID 0 array on two or more identical drives to get extra capacity and speed. Of course pay careful attention to frequent Library backup.
    Some apps like browsers are notorious for "leaking" memory so when doing serious images work keep non-essential applications closed. A SSD drive for boot helps because when apps open in just 3 seconds there is no reason to keep extraneous apps open.
    HTH
    -Allen
    P.S. I strongly recommend that original images be fully backed up before importing into Aperture or any other images management application.
    P.P.S. Makhe sure you have a properly set PS Scratch Disk assigned on a fast underfilled drive, and empty the scratch disk routinely.

  • Power Mac G5 Dual 2.5 - Move Hard Drive to another G5??

    Hi,
    I'm using a Power Mac G5 Dual 2.5 w/ OS 10.5.8 with my Pro Tools 7.4.2 HD3 rig, 2 internal hard drives and tons of external FW hard drives.  It's being hinky with me (every time I reboot/restart the Mac, I have to take the side cover off or it won't boot; wierdest problem ever), and being that I don't want to plunk down thousands of dollars on a new Mac and all new Pro Tools equipment, I'm hunting E-Bay for an exact duplicate of my Mac, of which there are plenty.  Since PowerPC architecture is long dead, they are dirt cheap.  No reason not to have a spare.
    My questions are:
    If I buy another Power Mac G5 Dual 2.5 machine, and swap the hard drive it comes with, and use my already functional hard drive (with the OS, Pro Tools and all related plug-ins installed), and move over my Pro Tools cards and 8 GB of RAM to the new(er) machine, will it boot up and work without me having to reformat/reinstall everything? 
    I also see numerous Power Mac G5 Dual 2.7 machines out there as well.  What are the chances of doing the same as question 1 with this?  I know the processor is different, but would my already formatted and functional hard drive care?  I don't think this will work, but I have to ask.
    If Question 2 is even possible, would upgrading to a Dual 2.7 even be worth it as far as noticeable speed improvement?  Superior Drummer, EZ Drummer and EZ Keys are all real time plug-ins that need the Mac's processor/memory to work. They don't use the Pro Tools cards to work.  So, would getting that extra 200 Mhz of processor power even matter?
    The reason I ask is that reinstalling the OS and Pro Tools is not the issue; 4 hours and it's done.  BUT, reinstalling Superior Drummer, EZ Drummer,and EZ Keys, along with the mountain of expansion packs, will literally take several days of work.  If I could just plop my old hard drives and 8GB of RAM into a newly purchased G5 Dual 2.5 or 2.7, and not go through that, it would be AWESOME.
    Thanks for any feedback on this.

    Just got done making the transfer to the "new" Dual 2.7 G5 I bought off E-Bay.  (yes, on Christmas Eve, because....well.... I have no life).  Worked dead, solid perfect!!!  I'm grinning from ear to ear right now.
    I had to reset some pref's in Pro Tools (not an issue),  Just got done running Pro Tools through its paces, and it works perfectly.  All plug ins run (had to re-authorize Superior Drummer and some related plugins because it detected the change in system serial #, again not an issue).  Other than that, it worked like it always has. I loaded every third party plug-in I could find, and every third party program I could find, and so far everything works without any issues.  Only exception is Team Viewer locks up when I try to close it (have to Force Quit), but I couldn't care less right now. I use that twice a year if that, and just to have someone help me remotely.
    Thanks for the info and help.  This made my Holidays.

  • Time Machine and SuperDuper on External Hard Drive?

    Hi!
    I really need a back up solution and after reading a lot of different articles and forums I think using Time Machine and SuperDuper may be the best option for me so I'm looking for advice:
    Should I partition an external hard drive and have part of the partition for Time Machine and part for my SuperDuper clone? If I do this how much space should I give to each partition (the computer is 250GB and I'm using about 90GB, I mostly deal with documents, photos and music, I don't have movies or many huge files on my computer)
    Will a 500GB external hard drive be sufficient and if the Time Machine partition becomes full as I assume it will in a few months if I understand correctly it will just start overwriting older back ups?
    I know the ideal might be to have an external hard drive dedicated to time machine and one dedicated to SuperDuper but to be honest I can't afford 2 hard drives at the moment so I plan to partition (unless you strongly advise against it) and I'll also back up extremely important files with Dropbox. I'm at that stage where I just need to start doing back ups and I like the idea of it happening in the background via Time Machine and doing a weekly clone with SuperDuper. I'd like to get started immediately.
    Any advice or problems I should be aware of would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance!

    Effie Darrow wrote:
    Should I partition an external hard drive and have part of the partition for Time Machine and part for my SuperDuper clone?
    imagine that drive croaks. both backups will be lost @ the same time ...
    If I do this how much space should I give to each partition (the computer is 250GB and I'm using about 90GB, I mostly deal with documents, photos and music, I don't have movies or many huge files on my computer)
    see this read about how much space you should give TM: http://web.me.com/pondini/Time_Machine/1.html.
    as for a SD clone, the size of your startup disk will suffice.
    Will a 500GB external hard drive be sufficient
    see above
    and if the Time Machine partition becomes full as I assume it will in a few months if I understand correctly it will just start overwriting older back ups?
    deleting them, yes.
    I know the ideal might be to have an external hard drive dedicated to time machine and one dedicated to SuperDuper
    that would indeed be ideal.
    but to be honest I can't afford 2 hard drives at the moment
    USB drives are dirt cheap right now but stay away from WD drives.
    good luck !
    JGG

Maybe you are looking for