Disable esmtp Inspection for Specific Host

Hello. Is it possible to disable esmtp inspection for a specific INSIDE host with use of a policy-map? If so, could you provide an example configuration.

Yes it is possible. You could do something like the following:
access-list ESMTP deny ip host 1.1.1.10 any
access-list ESMTP permit ip 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 any
class-map CMAP
match access-list ESMTP
policy-map PMAP
class CMAP
inspect esmtp
service-policy PMAP interface inside
Please remember to select a correct answer and rate helpful posts

Similar Messages

How to disable an alert for specific time period in SCOM 2012 R2

Hello,
Is there any option to disable an alert for specific time period in SCOM 2012 R2
Regards,
angs

No. But you can use the scheduler module in your rule or monitor, which will dictate when the workflow will actively run on the agent - hence disabling alerting for that time period.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff453828.aspx
Jonathan Almquist | SCOMskills, LLC (http://scomskills.com)

Disable Websense scanning for specific src networks

Hi all,
I have an installation of Forefront TMG 2010 with Websense Web Filter Plug-In. The task I am supposed to do is to disable redirecting requests to Websense for specific source networks. It is impossible to do it from Websense Server, due to license limitations.
I know there's a way to ignore some source users from isa_ignore.txt but I should filter this basing on source IP addresses. Please help me solving this issue.
Kind Regards,

Hi,
You could try to create a network for these IP addresses and create a account for this network. Then add this account into isa_ignore.txt.( I haven't tested it)
Best Regards,
Joyce
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Should I disable ESMTP inspect engine on the ASA??

Hello all,
I read a lot of blog that recomend disable the ESMTP inspect engine because in the mostly time affects email comunication servers between networks.
It is a good pratice ??
Thank you !!!!!

Hi Konsu,
You will find your answer here:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3110997#3110997
Hope that helps.
Varun

IsCellEditable() to disable cell editing for specific columns

Hello experts:
My SSCCE for this question is at the below link:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5293914&messageID=10244030#10244030
My question is how do I disable cell editing for all but the "Price" column of my table in the SSCCE. I tried adding the below lines of code right after creating the JTable. But get compilation errors.
//Here is the block of code that I am trying to include.
     @Override
     public boolean isCellEditable(int row, int col) {
     if (col == 7) {
               return true;
          } else {
               return false;
     } //Below is the method in detail03.java showing the block of code added
private JScrollPane BuildEmptyTable() {
     model = new DefaultTableModel();
     model.addTableModelListener( this );
     model.setColumnIdentifiers(new String[] { "SKU","Qty", "Price"});
        tblDetailTest = new JTable(model);
     @Override
     public boolean isCellEditable(int row, int col) {     //     <----- I tried placing the
     if (col == 7) {                                        //                  the code block here
               return true;
          } else {
               return false;
     tblDetailTest.setRowHeight(20);
     tblDetailTest.setPreferredScrollableViewportSize(new Dimension(900, 100));
     JTableHeader tblHdr = tblDetailTest.getTableHeader();
     tblHdr.setBackground(Color.yellow);
     JScrollPane scrollPane = new JScrollPane(tblDetailTest);
     return scrollPane;
}Can somebody please guide me? Thank you very much.

oops!
Sorry, my bad! I did not tell you what I tried. Following your suggestion, I made the following 2 changes to the code:
In the method, BuildEmptyTable(), where I build the table structure, I have the following statement:
     tblDetail = new JTable(model){
public boolean isCellEditable(int row, int col) {
       return col == 8;
};And in a separate method after the table is populated with data, I have the below code:
     tblDetail.getModel().addTableModelListener(new TableModelListener() {
     public void tableChanged(TableModelEvent e) {
     if (e.getType() == TableModelEvent.UPDATE)
          int row = e.getFirstRow();
          int column = e.getColumn();
             if (column == 8){
               //code here
               System.out.println("Updating item price!");
     }I do understand that the message gets displayed as many number of times equal to number of rows inserted into the table, because of the UPDATE event. But my problem is I do not know how to make a code change to do what I exactly want, as I have indicated in my previous note. Meaning I want the listener to be called only when the
data in the editable cell changes.
Thank You.

Disable disk sleep for specific drive?

My Mac Pro is running 24/7 with sleep enabled.
Hard disks are set to sleep, when possible. One of my SSDs is on an internal PCIe card. With disk sleep enabled, it does not come up quickly enough and the computer keeps thinking, it was ejected. The problem goes away, when disabling disk sleep.
No sleep is no problem with SSDs, but there are some spinning 4TB disks on the system only used infrequently, so I would like to let them sleep.
Is there a way to disable sleep for a specific disk only?
-- Harald

Hi BahaSs,
It generally is safe to "Enable write caching on disk" unless you are dealing with broken applications which are not using
FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH but need every write to be persistent. Disabling this would not hurt too much. It's really not recommend "Enable advanced performance" or
"Turn off Windows write-cache buffer flushing on the device" on a system where you value uptime or require data integrity.
Best Regards,
Elaine
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Yearly once inspection for specific characteristic with out inspec. lot

Hi Experts,
My client want some specific characteristic inspection yearly once with out inspection lot.
help me how to map this scenario
Regards,
Sbabu
Edited by: sbabu babu on Apr 22, 2010 12:27 PM

I dont think any standard solution for this,
few suggestions are
Go for a manual lot, client can track manual lot generation based on a report. report can be ABAP deveoped based on the client requirements. So every day client can run report and know which all materials are to be inspected on that day. I feel this as best.
DMR may have an issue as unnecessarily lot will get generated throughout the year in system. Its OK, we can do auto UD and all, but think do we really need these data go into system for rest 364 days for that one day inspection. If you ask me, I will say no to it.
Calibration lots can be generated only for equipments. Its only fixed time based inspection lot. But here material need to be maintained as equipment. i dont think, this is acceptable. Try first one which worked out well for me. Jus a report for tracking.
Thanks
Vineeth Varghese

Disabling TAB key for specific users

Good day,
I am new to SAPand the company will start pretty soon using SAP B1 8.8. We are facing the problem of disabling the TAB key function which give access to a complete list of some tables (in the particular case of financials, all G/L accounts) which is considered confidential and should not be available to any employee. Our actual SAP consultant says that the only solution is to make a special chargeable modification to standard SAP. I find it strange that SAP gives such an open an uncontrolled access to such vital information of the company. I am sure some one on this forum will give me a practical, elegant solution built in SAP authorization mecanism.

Hello,
Yes we can do it by Addional authorization
You can do it by Additional Authorization windows using by Form ID.
and then goto general authorization select Additinal Athorization as (No authorization) for selected user.
now selected user can not open Buisness partner on any transaction form .
then Make a Query for selected BP for selected User and set in on that field .
1>
First make new Authorization in Additional Authorization Creator window.
And select Edit button fill 10001 as form ID.
OK
2 >
Goto General Authorization select perticular user and select same Subject which was created in Additional Authorization window setup. and give no authorization for selected user. ok
3.Make a FMS from OCRD ,but first you should make filter in master for selected user in SAP. so with the help of we can filetr the record on transaction .
4.After make FMS with then help of UDF set it in where you want .
Now Your system is ready for your client requirement.
Please visit this link
Re: BP according to user
Thanks
Manvendra Singh Niranjan

Disabling commons logging for specific application

Hi
Is there some possiblity to disable default logging (commons) on glassfish? I have configured log4j and the default commons logging polluts my logs...
Regards

For those items that are to be disabled, you could add a new style class to each cell control to indicate it's disabled. You could use a formatter function:
addStyleClass : {
    parts : [ 'isRecordLocked' ],
    formatter : function(isRecordLocked) {
        return isRecordLocked ? "disabledStyle" : "";
where 'isRecordLocked' is the indicator in your data whether your record is locked, and 'disabledStyle' is the custom CSS class which caters for a disabled look of your cell.
If you need to suppress any press events for the locked records, you could do it in the same way.

Web Dynpro ALV disable column sort for specific column

Hi,
I have the above mentioned problem. The Coding I use is:
DATA: lr_field_settings TYPE REF TO if_salv_wd_field_settings,
lt_fields TYPE SALV_WD_T_FIELD_REF.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_field> LIKE LINE OF lt_fields.
lr_field_settings ?= lr_config.
lt_fields = lr_field_settings->get_fields( ).
READ TABLE lt_fields ASSIGNING <fs_field> WITH KEY fieldname = 'ANSPRECH_DETAILS'.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
<fs_field>-r_field->if_salv_wd_sort~set_sort_allowed( abap_false ).
<fs_field>-r_field->if_salv_wd_sort~set_grouping_allowed( abap_false ).
ENDIF.
When debugging I can see that the object attributes for sort_allowed and grouping_allowed are changed from 'X' to ' '
but the running application still allows sorting and grouping for the column 'ANSPRECH_DETAILS'.
So what did I forget or what is my mistake ????
Thx for your help.
Dino Dini

I got the similar requirement and I tried to do the below way.. it worked for me..
DATA: lr_field_settings TYPE REF TO if_salv_wd_field_settings.
DATA: lr_field TYPE REF TO cl_salv_wd_field.
lr_field_settings ?= lr_table.
lr_field = lr_field_settings->get_field( 'MATNR' ).
lr_field->IF_SALV_WD_SORT~SET_SORT_ALLOWED( abap_false
you can observe in the below image that sort option is not enabled for MATNR in the ALV.

Disable Portable Home Directories on specific hosts for all users?

Hello All,
Would it be possible to block any and all Portable Home Directory services for specific hosts? Something like "MobileAccountNeverAsk-<user>" but for the whole workstation? We have a network with both portable and stationary machines. I'd like our users to be able to use all machines, going portable on the MacBook and not bothering with syncing when logged into iMacs or Mac Pros.
The Open Directory servers are running Snow Leopard (for now) and all clients are running Lion.
Thanks
Paul

Darren,
Yes. The clients are Solaris 10 as well. And the domain is the same on both server and clients.
The files should be owned by real users.
If a user ssh's into the server directly, the permissions display properly. But on the clients it is nobody. Other than the permission displaying wrong, I haven't noticed any permission-related restrictions on the clients.
-Jim
Edited by: cr8rface on Sep 22, 2008 10:30 AM

SFTP/FTP Proxy Problems - Works for DMZ but not for Internet Hosts?!

Hi together,
we have a strange problem with our TMG Proxy, some infrastructure informations first
So we have the Client LAN with the IP range 192.168.11.x which is routeable to Server LAN 192.168.3.x but not to DMZ LAN 192.168.200.x.. The TMG is a 2 Node Array, 192.168.200.5 is the DMZ VIP. TMG DMZ IP Adress (192.168.200.5) and physical Adresses have
an NAT relation to one Public IP. HTTPS Inspection is active. We dont use (and dont want to) the TMG Client component.
When i use WinSCP, Putty or Filezilla and connect to a DMZ LAN Host (192.168.200.x) with "HTTP Proxy" (192.168.3.108:8080) everything is fine, it works like expected...
When i connect to an Internet Host it fails regardless which protocol i use - ftp, sftp or ssh. The error i get is
"The token supplied to the function is invalid."
An example for a failed SFTP Connection
Filezilla
Status: Connecting to system.internet.de...
Trace: Going to execute "C:\Program Files (x86)\FileZilla FTP Client\fzsftp.exe"
Response: fzSftp started
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::ConnectParseResponse(fzSftp started)
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::SendNextCommand()
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::ConnectSend()
Command: proxy 1 "tmg.local" 8080 "domain\user" "***********"
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::ConnectParseResponse()
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::SendNextCommand()
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::ConnectSend()
Command: open "[email protected]" 22
Trace: Looking up host "system.internet.de"
Trace: Connecting to 192.168.3.108 port 8080
Trace: Proxy error: 502 Proxy Error ( Das Token, das der Funktion übergeben wurde, ist ungültig. )
Error: Proxy error: 502 Proxy Error ( Das Token, das der Funktion übergeben wurde, ist ungültig. )
Trace: CControlSocket::DoClose(64)
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::ResetOperation(66)
Trace: CControlSocket::ResetOperation(66)
Error: Could not connect to server
Trace: CFileZillaEnginePrivate::ResetOperation(66)
TMG protocol throws this
Protokolltyp: Webproxy (Forward)
Status: 0x80090308
Regel: Webzugriff FTP Test
Quelle: Intern (192.168.11.31:44673)
Ziel: Extern (78.46.182.171:22)
Anforderung: system.internet.de:22
Filterinformationen: Req ID: 106f1cb7; Compression: client=No, server=No, compress rate=0% decompress rate=0%
Protokoll: https-inspect
Benutzer: domain\user
Hope you can explain me what we doin wrong or how to find out whats the problem. I didn`t find many informations about "0x80090308" or "The token supplied to the function is invalid.". Disabling HTTPS Inspection for the Source 192.168.11.31
doesnt change anything...
Connection to an DMZ Host looks like this:
Filezilla
Status: Connecting to system.dmz...
Trace: Going to execute "C:\Program Files (x86)\FileZilla FTP Client\fzsftp.exe"
Response: fzSftp started
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::ConnectParseResponse(fzSftp started)
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::SendNextCommand()
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::ConnectSend()
Command: proxy 1 "tmg.local" 8080 "domain\user" "***********"
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::ConnectParseResponse()
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::SendNextCommand()
Trace: CSftpControlSocket::ConnectSend()
Command: open "[email protected]" 22
Trace: Looking up host "system.dmz"
Trace: Connecting to 192.168.3.108 port 8080
Trace: Server version: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.6.1p1 Ubuntu-2ubuntu2
Trace: Using SSH protocol version 2
Trace: We claim version: SSH-2.0-PuTTY_Local:_Mar_28_2014_10:34:48
Trace: Doing Diffie-Hellman group exchange
Trace: Doing Diffie-Hellman key exchange with hash SHA-256
Trace: Host key fingerprint is:
TMG Protocol
Protokolltyp: Webproxy (Forward)
Status: 0 Der Vorgang wurde erfolgreich beendet.
Regel: Webzugriff FTP Test
Quelle: Intern (192.168.11.31:48818)
Ziel: Umkreis 2 (192.168.200.205:22)
Anforderung: system.dmz:22
Filterinformationen: Req ID: 10727dce; Compression: client=No, server=No, compress rate=0% decompress rate=0%
Protokoll: SSL-tunnel
Benutzer: domain\user
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Matthias

Hi Keith,
ok i found out the problem is https inspection is enabled....
- when i disable https inspection for source, same problem
- when i disable https inspection for destination, problem solved
the root cause why this worked is we had https inspection disabled for dmz destinations.
there is no direct route relation between the lan and dmz.
why is source exception not working in this?

Disable DSN for specific messages

Hi,
i have a problem, where i wish to disable DSN for specific internal users.
Scenario :
Interal User a sends a mail to special address c,
if mail host of special address c is not available or anything else i wish that internal user a is never informed that c didnt recieve his mail.
Can this be done ?
i thought about doing this with sieve.. but i dont know if DSNs generated by the IMS Master itself are also checked by sieve mechanism....

Please do notice that your bits do not support many of the features you want. And that later bits do. If you offer that to your company, perhaps you could update more often, or at least this time. We're not talking about a new package, here, but just an update to the one you have, that's not doing the job properly.
Also, if you had asked for what you needed at the beginning, I could have helped you better.
What you want is the sieve command, save-copy, or, perhaps monitor. Please see whitepaper, quoted below:
Saving Messages for Document Retention
If the reason you want to capture a copy of the message is for document retention, then you will want to take advantage of the new "capture" sieve action. You have to have iMS v5.2 or better to use this facility. The capture action can only be specified in a system or channel sieve; it is not available in user sieves. The general syntax is
capture "monitoraddress"
The monitor action is the same as the capture action. Users are encouraged to use the 'capture' instead of monitor as it best reflects the function being performed.
This action sends a DSN containing the original message in its entirety to the specified capture address. Since this is a DSN it is effectively a completely separate message so there's little chance of it causing side effects that will alert anyone to the monitoring. In particular, no addresses from the original message appear in the DSN header so there's very little chance of the capture copy getting forwarded to the wrong person by mistake. And even though the original message is encapsulated, it is a MIME encapsulation which means the content is easily accessible in any MIME-compliant user agent.
The capture action is nonstandard and undocumented. It was originally intended to be part of the habanero release, but the backporting of direct LDAP support to 5.2 means it is available in 5.2 as well. We certainly intend to support it in the future.
Saving Messages for Replay
There is an undocumented functionality in iMS for making a copy of messages for archival purposes. It's intended for saving sent messages in the event that they need to be replayed. We did this for folks who send mail via bad links to places where the mail may be received OK by an intermediate host but then subsequently lost on its way to the final destination.
This is done with the MESSAGE-SAVE-COPY mapping table. Entries in that table have the form
MESSAGE-SAVE-COPY
out-channel|from-address|D|msg-filename result
where
out-channel -- name of the channel the message is flowing out
from-address -- originator's address (envelope From: address)
D -- the letter "D" (stands for "dequeue" )
msg-filename -- name of the message file being dequeued.
result -- where to rename the file
Outbound Traffic
To save only messages out to the Internet, do
MESSAGE-SAVE-COPY
tcp_local|*|D|/instance-root/queue/tcp_local/*/* (tab-or-space)$Y/msg_save/$1/$2
Be aware that the archive isn't made until the message is actually dequeued from iMS (i.e., sent successfully or bounced). A rename operation is done (as opposed to a copy operation). As such, the message file has to remain on the same disk that the IMTA_QUEUE lives on.
Inbound Traffic
To capture inbound mail will want to have good control of what machines/pathways a message will take on its way into your systems. If your setup is such that mail always enters the site via an INBOUND relay and leaves the site via know outbound gateways, then inbound message flow is from INBOUND-MTA --> MsgStore machine.
Since you can have multiple MsgStore machines behind any one INBOUND-MTA, you will want to make configuration on the INBOUND-MTA machine such that it will use a dedicated queue to talk to the MsgStore machines. For instance, on the INBOUND-MTA machine, you could setup a rewrite rule in your imta.cnf file for MsgStore-A, MsgStore-B, ... MsgStore-Z like:
Node-A.store.domain.com.au $U%$D@tcp_to_store-daemon
Node-Z.store.domain.com.au $U%$D@tcp_to_store-daemon
and a corresponding 'tcp_to_store' channel which looks like:
! tcp_to_store
tcp_to_store smtp mx single_sys subdirs 20 noreverse maxjobs 7 \
pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver allowswitchchannel \
saslswitchchannel tcp_auth
tcp_to_store-daemon
This has the effect of routing all mail to any of your MsgStore machines through tcp_to_store channel. Transactions to other machines in your setup will take the tcp_intranet channel.
With this in place you can then throw in a MSG-SAVE-COPY mapping table which reads:
MESSAGE-SAVE-COPY
*|*|D|/instance-root/imta/queue/tcp_to_store/*/* $Y/msg_save/tcp_to_store/$2/$3
the net effect will be a number of queue files in the /msg_save/tcp_to_store directory which are ready for replay. Note the $2 in the sample represents the subdir that the message was already in. As such if you have 'subdirs 20' on your tcp_to_store channel, you will want to precreate the /msg_save/tcp_to_save/000 thru 019 subdirectories with the appropriate ownership and permissions.
To initiate the replay, you want to simply move the /msg_save/tcp_to_store/### directories to the /instance-root/imta/queue/reprocess and issue the command 'imsimta cache -synch'. The MTA will start pushing out those messages to the store(s).
If you want to have multiple replays happening you can kick off parallel runs of the reprocess channel by doing 'imsimta run reprocess &' a number of times.
And, If you want to segregate the storage for each MsgStore machine, you can make new channel in addition to the one suggested 'tcp_to_store' channel. You would then have groups of rewrite rules directing traffic over those channels or you could have one rewrite rule per channel block that you setup. That way you can have distinct entries in your MSG-SAVE-COPY mapping table.
Finally, since there is a rename operation taking place when you use the MSG-SAVE-COPY mapping table, you will want to make sure that at the first pass that /msg_save is on the same device that your queues live on.
Short Term Arvchival
You could setup a process in cron to move those files to a new device on a periodic basis. Better yet, schedule this via the job_controller. For instance, these lines at the top of your job_controller.cnf file:
[PERIODIC_JOB=archive_mover]
command=/usr/iplanet/sitescripts/arc_mover.sh
time=/00:10
will run the arc_mover.sh script for you every 10 minutes. Your arc_mover.sh could look something like:
#!/bin/ksh
# ***Script is untested - should generate some ideas though****
DUMMY=`test -d /var/tmp/timestamp.dir || mkdir -p /var/tmp/timestamp.dir`
cd /msg_save
# First pass
for dir in `find ./ -type d`
do
DUMMY=`test -d /real/storage/area/$dir || mkdir -p /real/storage/area/$dir`
cd $dir
for msgfile in `find ./ -type f -newer /var/tmp/timestamp.dir -name "*.00"`
do
mv $msgfile /real/storage/area/$dir/
done
cd /msg_save
done
touch /var/tmp/timestamp.dir
# Second pass cause we do not know how long we took.
for dir in `find ./ -type d`
do
DUMMY=`test -d /real/storage/area/$dir || mkdir -p /real/storage/area/$dir`
cd $dir
for msgfile in `find ./ -type f -newer /var/tmp/timestamp.dir -name "00"`
do
mv $msgfile /real/storage/area/$dir/
done
cd /msg_save
done
exit

Disable monitor in Operation Manager for 1 host

Hi,
I need to create a poweshell script that disable a monitor for a given host.
With the Disable-SCOMMonitor, I managed to disable it for a class, not an individual host. It looks feasable since you can disable it for a specific host of a class in the console.
So far I've got:
$Host = Read-Host "Enter computer name"
$MonitorName = "Total CPU Utilization Percentage"
$Monitors=Get-SCOMMonitor -ComputerName $strComputerName | where {$_.DisplayName -eq $MonitorName}
$MP = Get-SCOMManagementPack -DisplayName "BMA - Override - Orchestrator_Generated" | where {$_.Sealed -eq $False}
foreach ($Monitor in $Monitors) {
$Instance3 = Get-SCOMclass -name $Monitor.target.identifier.path | Get-SCOMClassInstance | where {$_.Path -eq $Host}
Disable-SCOMMonitor -Instance $Instance3 -ManagementPack $MP -Monitor $Monitor -Enforce
This does not return any error (besides when $Instance3 is empty, but that's an easy fix), but does not disable the monitor either...
I would appreciate some help to get that working :)
Thank you !

Hi,
I am a little confused, as you have the specified the monitor name as Total CPU Utilization Percentage, why are you still try to get an array of monitors?
If you want to disable one monitor for a computer, please try follow code, you may need to change some parameters according to your environment:
$Host = Read-Host "Enter computer name"
$MP = Get-SCOMManagementPack -DisplayName "BMA - Override - Orchestrator_Generated" | where {$_.Sealed -eq $False}
$Instance = Get-SCOMclass -displayname "The class name for the instance“| Get-SCOMClassInstance | where {$_.Path -eq $Host}
$Monitor = Get-SCOMMonitor -DisplayName "Total CPU Utilization Percentage"
Disable-SCOMMonitor -instance $Instance -ManagementPack $MP -Monitor $Monitor -Enforce
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Yan Li
Regards, Yan Li

Disable Print for specific situations

I Use Adobe Pro X.
Is there a way to make a form not print if certain information is entered? For instance, some forms in our list are for specific clients only. If a user pulls up a form with the incorrect client, I want to add a script that disables the form from being printed or faxed. I already added script to display a warning message, but that won't prevent anyone from printing it - and then the recipient will receive the letter with the warning message - which is potentially worse than just receiving the wrong letter.
Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
Thanks!

Tto detect a specific client, each system the client has would need a spacial file installed on it and the Organization filled in for the Identity object. This will be a real challenge.
Then once the print process is started there is no way to cancel it. You could unhide a hidden form filed and cover the content of the PDF. But then this could easily be defeated.
So in the end, it could be done, but you most likely will not be able to implement it outside of a given organization.

Disable esmtp Inspection for Specific Host

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for