Disabling users

I have no idea what has changed but in our production environment but i recieve the following error when disabling a users
DOBJ.GRP.USR_STATUS_ERROR
The weird thing is that OIM actually disables all the provisioned resources although none of the Disable Process task are shown in the resource and the status stays active. its like oim fails to update it self.....

ERROR 09:46:02,436, RMICallHandler-131 XELLERATE.SERVER - UserStatusError
ERROR 09:46:02,449, RMICallHandler-131 XELLERATE.SERVER - Class/Method: tcDataObj/save Error :Insertion of dataobject into database failed
ERROR 09:46:02,454, RMICallHandler-131 XELLERATE.DATABASE - Class/Method: tcDataBase/rollbackTransaction encounter some problems: Rollback Executed From
java.lang.Exception: Rollback Executed From
at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataBase.rollbackTransaction(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.rollback(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.doRollback(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.client.events.tcUSRautoGroupMembership.implementation(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.client.events.tcBaseEvent.run(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.runEvent(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.eventPostUpdate(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcUSR.eventPostUpdate(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.update(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcUserOperationsBean.updateUserData(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcUserOperationsBean.updateUser(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.tcUserOperationsSession.updateUser(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor278.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.joinpoint.EJBJoinPointImpl.invoke(EJBJoinPointImpl.java:35)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.TxRequiredInterceptor.invoke(TxRequiredInterceptor.java:50)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.SecurityRoleInterceptor.invoke(SecurityRoleInterceptor.java:47)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.InvocationContextPool.invoke(InvocationContextPool.java:55)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.StatelessSessionEJBObject.OC4J_invokeMethod(StatelessSessionEJBObject.java:87)
at tcUserOperations_RemoteProxy_6ocop18.updateUser(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor277.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at com.evermind.server.rmi.RmiMethodCall.run(RmiMethodCall.java:61)
at com.evermind.util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:303)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
ERROR 09:46:02,477, RMICallHandler-131 XELLERATE.SERVER - UserStatusError
ERROR 09:46:02,491, RMICallHandler-131 XELLERATE.SERVER - Class/Method: tcDataObj/save Error :Insertion of dataobject into database failed
ERROR 09:46:02,496, RMICallHandler-131 XELLERATE.DATABASE - Class/Method: tcDataBase/rollbackTransaction encounter some problems: Rollback Executed From
java.lang.Exception: Rollback Executed From
at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataBase.rollbackTransaction(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.rollback(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.doRollback(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.client.events.tcUSRautoGroupMembership.implementation(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.client.events.tcBaseEvent.run(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.runEvent(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.eventPostUpdate(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcUSR.eventPostUpdate(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.update(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcUserOperationsBean.updateUserData(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcUserOperationsBean.updateUser(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.tcUserOperationsSession.updateUser(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor278.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.joinpoint.EJBJoinPointImpl.invoke(EJBJoinPointImpl.java:35)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.TxRequiredInterceptor.invoke(TxRequiredInterceptor.java:50)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.SecurityRoleInterceptor.invoke(SecurityRoleInterceptor.java:47)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.InvocationContextPool.invoke(InvocationContextPool.java:55)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.StatelessSessionEJBObject.OC4J_invokeMethod(StatelessSessionEJBObject.java:87)
at tcUserOperations_RemoteProxy_6ocop18.updateUser(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor277.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at com.evermind.server.rmi.RmiMethodCall.run(RmiMethodCall.java:61)
at com.evermind.util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:303)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
ERROR 09:46:02,521, RMICallHandler-131 XELLERATE.SERVER - UserStatusError
ERROR 09:46:02,538, RMICallHandler-131 XELLERATE.SERVER - Class/Method: tcDataObj/save Error :Insertion of dataobject into database failed
ERROR 09:46:02,544, RMICallHandler-131 XELLERATE.DATABASE - Class/Method: tcDataBase/rollbackTransaction encounter some problems: Rollback Executed From
java.lang.Exception: Rollback Executed From
at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataBase.rollbackTransaction(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.rollback(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.doRollback(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.client.events.tcUSRautoGroupMembership.implementation(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.client.events.tcBaseEvent.run(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.runEvent(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.eventPostUpdate(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcUSR.eventPostUpdate(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.update(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcUserOperationsBean.updateUserData(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcUserOperationsBean.updateUser(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.tcUserOperationsSession.updateUser(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor278.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.joinpoint.EJBJoinPointImpl.invoke(EJBJoinPointImpl.java:35)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.TxRequiredInterceptor.invoke(TxRequiredInterceptor.java:50)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.SecurityRoleInterceptor.invoke(SecurityRoleInterceptor.java:47)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.InvocationContextPool.invoke(InvocationContextPool.java:55)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.StatelessSessionEJBObject.OC4J_invokeMethod(StatelessSessionEJBObject.java:87)
at tcUserOperations_RemoteProxy_6ocop18.updateUser(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor277.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at com.evermind.server.rmi.RmiMethodCall.run(RmiMethodCall.java:61)
at com.evermind.util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:303)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

Similar Messages

Getting error "1013009 Administrator Has Temporarily Disabled User Commands

Hi All,
I am getting the error"1013009 Administrator Has Temporarily Disabled User Commands" while executing a report script in Essbase 11.1.1.3
Appreciate any help..
Thanks
Mahesh

Mahesh wrote:
Hi All,
I am getting the error"1013009 Administrator Has Temporarily Disabled User Commands" while executing a report script in Essbase 11.1.1.3
Appreciate any help..
Thanks
Mahesh
Possible Cause
When a database is being restructured or any application/database on the server is being copied, you can get this message.
or
When a cube is being restructured, commands are restricted because the integrity of the cube has to be stable and no one is allowed to access it.
or
Copying an application requires that the Essbase security file be in read/write mode and therefore other applications are not accessible until the process is completed.
Possible Solution
In Application Settings, verify that the Allow Commands or Allow Updates options are not selected.
If not selected select those..and try
Regards,
Prabhas
Edited by: P on Apr 7, 2011 3:36 PM
Edited by: P on Apr 7, 2011 3:38 PM

Outlook Contact Card - Organization Tab disabled users

In Outlook there is a Contact Card showing detailed information about that person. the Organization tab shows the contact's "Manager", "Shares Same Manager" (other contacts with the same manager), and "Direct Reports" (people
that report to that contact).
The problem i am seeing is that Users disabled in Active Directory (people that have left the company) are showing up in the Organization Tab.
How can i filter out disabled users from this list for anyone using Outlook?
I cannot permanently delete users from Active Directory until after a disabled account reaches a certain age. Also i would prefer not modifying the disabled Active Directory user accounts.
We mostly run Outlook 2010 with a few people running Outlook 2013

Hi,
Outlook has no control over this, it just displays what it got from the server end. And to my knowledge, there is no such a feature to filter out those users from that list, at least on Outlook client.
Regards,
Ethan Hua
TechNet Community Support
It's recommended to download and install
Configuration Analyzer Tool (OffCAT), which is developed by Microsoft Support teams. Once the tool is installed, you can run it at any time to scan for hundreds of known issues in Office
programs.

How to do Archiving of deleted & disabled users in OIM11g

Hi All,
As per the requirement we have to do archive of deleted & disabled users in OIM11g(11.1.1.2) after 75days. Can i know how can i achieve this?
Regards,
user7609

Just to recap:
Your client requirement is to archive users out of OIM after 75 days. This means in addition to actually disabling and/or deleting them, fully removing any traces of them from the system.
As Kevin & GP said, OIM is just not built to do this. API alone is not going to accomplish this task... you'll also need to include SQL to actually drop data out of tables.
All that being said, your post said the reason for this was because of a "license for limited users". Oracle Identity Manager is licensed on an active user basis. You really should talk with your Oracle rep to confirm, but I've never had licensing contracts include deleted/disabled users.

Disabling User in Solaris

Is there anyway to change the way the resource adapter for Solaris and Linux disables users so that it uses the native lock provided through passwd rather than setting a random password?
Scott

Is there anyway to change the way the resource
adapter for Solaris and Linux disables users so that
it uses the native lock provided through passwd
rather than setting a random password?No there is no way to do that.
The usage of passwd -d and or -l is limited to certain installations. If you read the man page for passwd you will see that it only works for files as the repository not for any of the other possibilities (NIS or NIS+ or ldap). It also depends on PAM modules to implement this and they do not have to be configured on the system.
WilfredS

Disabled User Password should not be changed

Hi,
We have a requirement that only if the user's status is active, then only administartor must be able to change the user password. Admin should not be able to change the password if the user is in disabled state/locked state.How can we achieve this?please sugest...
Regards
Vinoth

Hi,
We have made an entity adapter which is taking usr login value from User[in Data object manager] and calling our java method which is making connection to OIM database and getting us the status of user.
Now if the status of user is disabled method is returning true and on true we have associated our error code to it.
We are executing our entity adapter in pre-update execution.
Now when we are changing password of any disabled user we are able to see our error code. But what ever update [either first name update, enable] we are running on that user same error code is appearing.
Plesae suggest/reply.
thanks

Disable User on updating an User attribute in OIM

Hi,
I have OIM 11g R2 with LDAP SYNC enabled with OID through OVD.
I want to trigger Disable user on modifying an UDF attribute of user.
Like if attribute1 of user is set to true then disabke user operation should be triggered for the user.
So first in my adapter i will check whether attribute is true and then trigger disable user.
In 11g R2 as mapping adapters attached to Users form in dataobject manager is not supported i am not able to map to the userdefinition and hence not able to check if attribute1 is true or false.
Please help and let me know if this can be achieved in any other way.
Edited by: 988070 on Mar 20, 2013 3:55 AM

You can write a post process event handler:
It will update the user status to disable when UDF attrtibute is set to true.
For this, you need to set the condition as:
Get the value of user defined attribute and store it in a variable "flag".
disable UserManagerResult disable(java.lang.String attributeName, java.lang.Object attributeValue) //attributeName will be user defined fieldm value will be "true"
throws ValidationFailedException,
oracle.iam.platform.authz.exception.AccessDeniedException,
UserDisableException,
NoSuchUserException,
SearchKeyNotUniqueException
Disables the user account matching the search criteria.
Parameters:
attributeName - - The attribute name for the search criteria.
attributeValue - - The attribute value for the search criteria.
Returns:
UserManagerResult containing the entity id of the disabled user.
Cheers,
Vamsi.

OIM-DBAT ...ERROR during Disabling user

Hi,
I am using database app tables connector with OIM, wherein the user is being provisioned to a database table. When user is Disabled, the assosciated database resource does not gets Disabled, Disable User is rejected and It gives following error:
GCPROV.ProvTransportProvider.DBProvisioningTransport.DB_STATUS_FIELD_LOOKUP_ERROR" does not correspond to a known Response Code. Using "UNKNOWN
The table has some attributes viz. Username, user id, fname, lname, Status(can be 0 or 1), email.
The requirement is: when user id terminated in OIM, the respective database resource should get Disabled, that is the status should be updated to 0.

Hi Sunny,
When I disable OIM user , Disable User process of the database account is invoked but it gets rejected giving the above stated error. And the status field in process form is not updated. In the GTC configuration, I have mentioned the table column name(ENABLED,which can take values 0 or 1) that will be acting as status ,and also provided the Lookup code name that contains the status mappings as follows:
Code Decode
Active 0
Disabled 1

Remove GrantSendOnBehalfTo disabled user accounts - A novice at scripting

Hello. Can anyone help please
In our exchange 2010 environment we have users who are granted send on behalf to access. Obviously some users leave and I m finding that there are ghosts left behind which are causing issues with our team who add users into the grantsendonbehalfto
option using the EMC. Using the log view we coy out the command and then remove the disabled user from the command and then paste this into an Exchange Powershell command line. This wrks because it is doing what Exchange EMC does which is rewrites
the -GrantSendOnBehalfTo option in it new entirety.
The problem occurs because I need to remove these en-mass from approx 700 plus accounts.
I have tried to modify one user in order to get the script to work but it doesn't.
This is the error message that happens when I run the script below against a known account with at least 2 disabled users in:-
Couldn't find object "xxxxxxxx.xx.xxxxxxx.xxx.xx/DisabledUsers/2013-08/Gaynor Collins-Punter". Please make sure that i
was spelled correctly or specify a different object. Reason: The recipient xxxxxxxx.xx.xxxxxxx.xxx.xx/DisabledUsers/2
13-08/Gaynor Collins-Punter isn't the expected type.
+ CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [], ManagementObjectNotFoundException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : F6498844
+ PSComputerName : ex02-0029.xx.xxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Am running the script from my local PC
This is the script I have used.
# Gather info use get-mailbox -resultsize unlimited$mailboxes = Get-Mailbox zplew1
Foreach($mailbox in $mailboxes)
for($i = ($mailbox.GrantSendOnBehalfTo.count)-1; $i -ge 0; $i--)
$address=$mailbox.GrantSendOnBehalfTo[$i]
$addressString=$address.addressString
If($addressString -like "*disabled*")
$mailbox.GrantSendOnBehalfTo.removeat($i)
$info >> "C:\Scripts\grantsendonbehalfto.csv"
$mailbox |set-mailbox -GrantSendOnBehalfTo $mailbox.grantsendonbehalfto
}If you requiere any more info please let me know.

#1 - I recommend posting in xchange forum fo rhow to do this
#2 - Wen an account is disabled most on the information in the object is hidden. YOu would need to undelete to use the object.
#3 - Get list as text and validaye al values are not deleted accounts. Remove deleted and save back.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

How to catch rollback in Disable user process task in Xellerat User Process

hi ...
I want to send an email to manager group of the user, once the user is disabled from the OIM (when end date is reached). I created an adapter and attached it to the ‘Changed User Disabled’ process task in the ‘xellerate user provisioning’ process and add a new row in the “Lookup.USR_PROCESS_TRIGGERS” Lookup definition. (code key: USR_DISABLED and Decode: Change User Disabled ). This adapter executes only when the user status is equal to “disabled”.
This works correctly when the OIM user disabling process execute without any errors. But sometimes while disabling the user it gives an error (“resource is not configured properly”) and rolls back everything and make the user active. But at the same time my adapter runs and sends the mail informing user is disabled but yet user is active.
My problem is how can I find or catch rolls back transaction in the “Disable User” process task (which is in “Xellerate User” process”) ??? If I can get to know that a roll back is occurred then I can send a mail to OIM administrator, informing that user disable process is failed.
Can someone please help me to find this..
Thanks in advance :)
Regards,
i.k.

Hi Rajiv,
Error occurs while disabling the user due to resource configuration problems. ( error message is : DOBJ.RESOURCE_NOTCONFIGURED_PROPERLY -- One or more provisioned resource is not configured properly) In this case i know the problem and how to solve it. But what I want to know is in any case if disable process get fail and if things get roll back again, then how can I track that situation and send a mail to OIM Admin(informing the failure) instead of sending a mail to user managers saying that user account has been disabled.
I think now my problem is clear…. Can u please help me to find this.
Regards,
i.k.

Disabling User Account Control - CUBAC

Installing Cisco Unified Business Attendant Console. Documentation says that on server 2003 / sever 2008 installations, disabling of the user account control is required. It gives a procedure to do this on Server 2008.
The install I'm working on is on Server 2003. I cannot find anything like this. Googling on the subject has led me to believe that this is likely a documentation bug, as I can find no reference to Server 2003 having this feature.
Has anyone else run into this? The documentation appears to have been written by someone who speaks english as a second language, and not thoroughly vetted for correctness.

Hi Clifford,
This would just be for Windows server 2008
CSCtc77367            Bug Details
CUBAC 3.1.1.5 docs need to say "disable User Account Contol" in win2008w.
It appears UAC (user account Control) a new feature found in   Windows Server 2008 will block license files from being properly applied in CUBAC 3.1.1.5.
The installation and requirement docs should reflect that UAC needs to be disabled before installing CUBAC on Windows Server 2008.
Observations:
Go to webadmin, licensing
When you look at that page, you will not see any licensing info; no eval.
It says, no licensing info.
When we turned off UAC, the licensing page showed the eval info for 5 days.
At which point we were able to add the license
Status
Fixed
Severity
2 - severe
Last Modified
In Last Year
Product
Cisco Unified Attendant Consoles
Technology
1st Found-In
3.1(1.5)
Fixed-In
Release-Pending
Cheers!
Rob

Disabling user interface until http request is finished

We are using JDeveloper 11 TP2 and we have fallowing problem. In our jspx pages (ADF Faces) in case when user clicks command button after it has been already clicked and before that first request is finished then action listener is triggered twice. We want to prevent that multiple action listener execution. How we can do that? Is there any way to maybe disable user interface until the request is finished.
Thanks in advance

We have solved our problem. Our solution is not general but in our case is good enough.
I have done it like this:
In jspx page we put javascript method.
function setToolbarButtonDisabled(ev){
ev.getSource().setDisabled(true);
On button that should be disabled after click put Client Listener.
<af:commandToolbarButton text="#{ui_labels.newPartners}"
icon="/images/new_ena.png"
id="createPartnersBtn"
binding="#{partnersBacking.createPartnersBtn}"
actionListener="#{partnersBacking.createNewPartners}">
<af:clientListener method="setToolbarButtonDisabled"
type="click"/>
</af:commandToolbarButton>
With this after first click button is unabled .
Later when we need to enable button we do it with method
public void enableBtn(RichCommandToolbarButton btn){
btn.setDisabled(false);
AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(btn);
This method is in backing been for that page and it is called in action listener for action (click on some third button ) that should enable disabled button.

Disabling User instead of deleting

I'm using OIM 9031.
I've created a custom access policy which grants user a resource (OEBS) based on his group membership.
When user is no longer a member of group, his account is deleted from assigned resource. How do I change the behavior of OIM so that user account in OEBS would be blocked instead of completely deleted?

Yes, I want the account to be reanabled after the user is a member of a group again. No idea how to change the provisioning workflow...
Maybe, I should add two new tasks, for enabling/disabling user, but then I must somehow incorporate 'enable user' task into my workflow. It may require 3rd task which checks if user account already exists (e.g. is user already provisioned the resource) and depending on response code, it may launch either create or enable task...

Disabling user options

Is it possible to disable certain items in user's MySites? I imagine these may be managed in different areas, but I want to disable users:
Creating hashtags (but still allow them to have a newsfeed they can write to, I dont mind them using hashtags, I just dont want them adding to the central hashtag list so everyone can see them)
Creating Apps
Creating a blog
Thanks in advance.

For #1, no. #2 and #3, not by default -- the issue is that user's are using Self-Service Site Creation for MySites. That means that they're the Site Collection Administrators of their MySites and have complete control over it.
You can prevent (or reject) an App from being allowed on the farm via Central Administration.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Disabling User specific/Default Setting

In the output of CV04n selection while 'Save Layout' how is it possible to enable/disable
'User Specific' or 'Default setting'

Hi,
Did you mean Set or enable / disable? Anyways if you want to set, you can do it as follows:
1. Global: I.e. Available for all
Selection Variant: Global do not toggle the User specific box
Description: XYZ
2. User Specific: Available only for the user
Selection Variant: aaa Toggle the user specific box.
Description: uvw
If this doesn't answer your query, please explain further.
regards
C

Disabling user through API call -process task-followed by an Enable User...

Hi,
I am running on OIM 9.1 BP11. I implemented a process task to disable the user based on a URS form field change.
I can confirm from the log file and the resource that the Disable user (xellerate user) happened. But the user got enabled back right away. The log file showed that a scheduled task named "Enable User After Start Date" ran and enable the user. So, I disabled that scheduled task.
Then I repeated the test again. I observed the same behavior of user being disabled and enabled again but this time, OIM called an adapter. This is what I observed in the log file:
20988 INFO,20 Oct 2010 12:21:56,519,[XELLERATE.DATABASE],DB read: select evt.ev t_key, evt.evt_name, evt.evt_package, mil.mil_name from mil mil, evt evt w here evt.evt_key = mil.evt_key and mil.mil_key=10
20989 DEBUG,20 Oct 2010 12:21:56,519,[XELLERATE.DATABASE],select evt.evt_key, ev t.evt_name, evt.evt_package, mil.mil_name from mil mil, evt evt where evt. evt_key = mil.evt_key and mil.mil_key=10
20990 INFO,20 Oct 2010 12:21:56,519,[XELLERATE.PERFORMANCE],Query: DB: 0, LOAD: 0, TOTAL: 0
20991 DEBUG,20 Oct 2010 12:21:56,519,[XELLERATE.SERVER],Class/Method: tcBusiness Obj/getSqlOperationFromMembers entered.
20992 DEBUG,20 Oct 2010 12:21:56,519,[XELLERATE.SERVER],Class/Method: tcBusiness Obj/getSqlOperationFromMembers left.
20993 DEBUG,20 Oct 2010 12:21:56,519,[XELLERATE.ADAPTERS],Class/Method: tcADPCla ssLoader/getClassLoader entered.
20994 DEBUG,20 Oct 2010 12:21:56,519,[XELLERATE.ADAPTERS],Class/Method: tcADPCla ssLoader/getClassLoader left.
20995 DEBUG,20 Oct 2010 12:21:56,520,[XELLERATE.ADAPTERS],Class/Method: tcADPCla ssLoader/findClass entered.
20996 INFO,20 Oct 2010 12:21:56,530,[XELLERATE.ADAPTERS],Adapter: Enabling the User was initiated for the task: Enable User.
20997 INFO,20 Oct 2010 12:21:56,531,[XELLERATE.JAVACLIENT],System Event Handler : Enabling the User
I did exactly the same disabling user process at another client and it worked fine. I don't understand what causes OIM to call this system Event handler to re-enable the user.
Please help.
Thanks
Khanh

Do you have any Entity Adapter or Event Handler or Trigger which enables user for some condition ?
Check your environment. If you have please remove that and try.
Does this user has and provisioned resource ? If yes, try for some other user which doesn't have resource provisioned.

Disabling users

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for