Disconnecting take long time ...

Hi ,
Sometimes when i disconnect from vpn connection , it took for a long time to disconnect and i can't connect to that vpn again, because status remain disconnecting ... . i should restart my mac to connect to that vpn again !
What should i do ?

Hello,
To save what ? commit data?
maybe you could have the start of an answer by reading the following:
http://groundside.com/blog/GrantRonald.php?title=oracle_forms_can_you_get_it_to_perform_o&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Francois

Similar Messages

  • HT4759 Hello .. I've been subscribed for ic;oud for 20$ per year and I found it useless for many reasons: that I can not disconnect my mobile while the uploading process and it takes long time for uploading my data .. Its not a reliable system that's why

    Hello .. I've been subscribed for ic;oud for 20$ per year and I found it useless for many reasons: that I can not disconnect my mobile while the uploading process and it takes long time for uploading my data .. Its not a reliable system that's why I need to deactivate the space service and take my money back .. Thanks

    The "issues" you've raised are nothing to do with the iCloud service.
    No service that uploads data allows you to disconnect the device you are uploading from while uploading data. Doing so would prevent the upload from completing. It is a basic requirement for any uploading service that you remain connected to it for uploading to be possible.
    The time it takes to upload data to iCloud is entirely dependent on how fast your Internet connection is, and how much data you are uploading. Both of these things are completely out of Apple's control. Whichever upload service you use will be affected by the speed of your Internet connection.

  • BPM Process chain takes long time to process

    We have BI7, Netweaver 2004s on Oracle and SUN Solaris
    There is a process chain (BPM) which pulls data from the CRM system into BW. The scheduled time to run this chain is 0034 hrs. This chain should ideally complete before / around 0830 Hrs. <b>Now the problem is that every alternate day this chain behaves normally and gets completed well before 0830 hrs but every alternate day this chain fails…</b> there are almost 40 chains running daily. Some are event triggered (dependent with each other) or some run in parallel. In this, (BPM) process chain, usually there are 5 requests with 3 Delta and 2 full uploads (Master Data). The delta uploads finishes in 30 minutes without any issues with very few record transfers. The first full upload is from 0034 hrs to approximately 0130 hrs and the 2nd upload is from 0130 hrs to 0230 hrs. Now if the 1st upload gets delayed then the people who are initiating these chains, stop the 2nd full upload and continue it after all the process chains are completed. Now this entire BPM process chain sometimes takes 17 -18 hrs to complete!!!!!
    No other loads in CRM or BW when these process chains are running
    CRM has background jobs to push IDOCS to BW which run every 2 minutes which runs successfully
    Yesterday this chain got completed successfully (well within stipulated time) with over 33,00,000 records transferred but sometimes it has failed to transfer even 12,00,000 records!!
    Attaching a zip file, please refer the “21 to 26 Analysis screen shot.doc” from the zip file
    Within the zip file, attaching “Normal timings of daily process chains.xls” – the name explains it….
    Also within the zip file refer “BPM Infoprovider and data source screen shot.doc” please refer this file as the infopackage (page 2) which was used in the process chain is not displayed later on in page number 6 BUT CHAIN GOT SUCESSFULLY COMPLETED
    We have analyzed:--
    1)     The PSA data for BPM process chain for past few days
    2)     The info providers for BPM process chain for past few days
    3)     The ODS entries for BPM process chain for past few days
    4)     The point of failure of BPM process chain for past few days
    5)     The overall performance of all the process chains for past few days
    6)     The number of requests in BW for this process chain
    7)     The load on CRM system for past few days when this process chain ran on BW system
    As per our analysis, there are couple of things which can be fixed in the BW system:--
    1)     The partner agreement (transaction WE20) defined for the partner LS/BP3CLNT475 mentions both message types RSSEND and RSINFO: -- collect IDOCs and pack size = 1 Since the pack size = 1 will generate 1 TRFC call per IDOC, it should be changed to 10 so that less number of TRFCs will be generated thus less overhead for the BW server resulting in the increase in performance
    2)     In the definition of destination for the concerned RFC in BW (SM59), the “Technical Setting” tab says the “Load balancing” option = “No”. We are planning to make it “Yes”
    But we believe that though these changes will bring some increase in performance, this is not the root cause of the abnormal behavior of this chain as this chain runs successfully on every alternate day with approximately the same amount of load in it.
    I was not able to attach the many screen shots or the info which I had gathered during my analysis. Please advice how do I attach these files
    Best Regards,

    Hi,
    Normally  index  creation or deletion can take long time in case  your database statistics are not updated properly, so can check  stat  after your data loading is completed and index generation is done,  Do creation of database statistics.
    Then try to recheck ...
    Regards,
    Satya

  • The Application Takes long time to Start

    Hello All,
    We ar eon Unix->64 Bit-> Essbase 11.1.1.3.
    Problem Description : The application is taking long to start up. around 5 to 6 minutes. This is very first time it is happening.
    There were no specific changes done to the application in the recent releases.
    I have tried all options 1. Compacating outline, 2. Purging the application log etc. all other applications respond good on this host except this. Usually any application should not take more than 1 to 2 minutes to start up.
    There are no specific errors or XCP files recorded in the logs and folders.
    Appreciate your suggestions
    MS

    Thanks Jitendra and Prabhas,
    I know i have posted this thread sometime back and later I had to jump on a New release, so did not get time to check your inputs.
    Well I am back on this issue again. I have been working on various option to get this issues solved " start of App takes long time"
    Here are some Details. We are on SunOs 64 Bit, has 12CU with dual core,  with Essbase 11.1.1.3 running on it. This is an ASO application and has just 7 dimensions, Out of which the ORGANIZATION Dimension is pretty huge with Multiple Hierarchies enabled ( Both Stored and Dynamic ) and has more than 20,00,000 members including the alternate hierarchies ( Shared members)
    I did a smoke test by building dimension by dimension the app was startiung up in just *40* seconds. and when i reached the ORG dimension and added more than 70,000 memebrs . there i fall sick. the app now gets back to its old issue ( Takes more than 10 mainutes to start).
    CPU Usage ranges between 3.1 % to 4 %
    PID USER NLWP PRI NI VSZ RSS S STIME ELAPSED %CPU COMMAND
    4424 user1 1 59 20 1608 1032 S 18:13:33 00:00 0.0 grep COMMAND
    4428 user1 1 59 20 1608 1032 S 18:13:33 00:00 0.0 grep ESS
    4766 user1 88 55 20 6814168 5684200 O 17:37:48 35:45 3.1 /path/xyz/masked/ASO_APP hgfedc NOCREAT.
    But My question here is, in the last moth cube i still similar number of members in the cube and nothing really had changed.
    Essbase GURU's Please give me some Hint to think out of box now.
    Thanks
    MS

  • Report takes long time for few records

    hi frends,
    I m facing one problem with my Web based erp application which is developed in .net , in my application when i open the  report from my applicaiton , in my temp folder there one file gets created name is "rpt conmgr cache"
    bcoz of this for few records also my report takes too much time and opens very slow and it takes long time, and it happens in some of the reports only , other reports are working cool and its not creating any file in temp folder,,, so can u guide me whats this file and what can be the solution for it,
    Thanks
    Mithun

    hi sabhajit,
    i have already checked the sql query it is taking less then seconds.
    any other steps u want me to check then pls let me know?
    thanks mithun

  • Photo both takes long time to open, what can i do?

    photo both takes long time to open, what can i do?

    SO do you think we can get a aunser? i just bout my imac u know!!

  • MVIEW refresh takes long time

    Materialized view takes long time to refresh but when i tried select & insert into table it's very fast.
    i executed SQL and it takes ust 1min ( total rows is 447 )
    but while i refresh the MVIEW it takes 1.5 hrs ( total rows is 447 )
    MVIEW configration :-
    CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW EVAL.EVALSEARCH_PRV_LWC
    TABLESPACE EVAL_T_S_01
    NOCACHE
    NOLOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    NOPARALLEL
    BUILD DEFERRED
    REFRESH FORCE ON DEMAND
    WITH PRIMARY KEY
    Not sure why so much diffrence

    infant_raj wrote:
    Materialized view takes long time to refresh but when i tried select & insert into table it's very fast.
    i executed SQL and it takes ust 1min ( total rows is 447 )
    but while i refresh the MVIEW it takes 1.5 hrs ( total rows is 447 )A SELECT does a consistent read.
    A MV refresh does that and also writes database data.
    These are not the same thing and cannot be directly compared.
    So instead of pointing at the SELECT execution time and asking why the MV refresh is not as fast, look instead WHAT the refresh is doing and HOW it is doing that.
    Is the execution plan sane? What events are the top ones for the MV refresh? What are the wait states that contributes most to the processing time of the refresh?
    You cannot use the SELECT statement's execution time as a direct comparison metric. The work done by the refresh is more than the work done by the SELECT. You need to determine exactly what work is done by the refresh and whether that work is done in a reasonable time, and how other sessions are impacting the refresh (it could very well be blocked by another session).

  • Takes Long time for Data Loading.

    Hi All,
    Good Morning.. I am new to SDN.
    Currently i am using the datasource 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H and it contains 225 fields. Currently i am using around 40 fields in my report.
    Can i hide the remaining fields in the datasource level itself (TCODE : RSA6)
    Currently data loading takes more time to load the data from PSA to ODS (ODS 1).
    And also right now i am pulling some data from another ODS(ODS 2)(LookUP). It takes long time to update the data in Active data table of the ODS.
    Can you please suggest how to improve the performance of dataloading on this Case.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Siva.

    Hi....
    Yes...u can hide..........just Check the hide box for those fields.......R u in BI 7.0 or BW...........whatever ........is the no of records is huge?
    If so u can split the records and execute............I mean use the same IP...........just execute it with different selections.........
    Check in ST04............is there are any locks or lockwaits..........if so...........Go to SM37 >> Check whether any Long running job is there or not.........then check whether that job is progressing or not............double click on the Job >> From the Job details copy the PID..............go to ST04 .....expand the node............and check whether u r able to find that PID there or not.........
    Also check System log in SM21............and shortdumps in ST04........
    Now to improve performance...........u can try to increase the virtual memory or servers.........if possiblr........it will increase the number of work process..........since if many jobs run at a time .then there will be no free Work prrocesses to proceed........
    Regards,
    Debjani......

  • The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run

    Hi experts,
    The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run around 5 hours in production
    I have checked the note 382329,
    -> where the indexes 1 and 4 are active
    -> index 4 was not "Index does not exist in database system ORACLE"- i have assgined to " Indexes on all database systems and ran the delta load in development system, but guess there are not much data in dev it took 2-1/2 hrs to run as it was taking earlier. so didnt find much differnce in performance.
    As per the note Note 549552 - CO line item extractors: performance, i have checked in the table BWOM_SETTINGS these are the settings that are there in the ECC system.
    -> OLTPSOURCE -  is blank
       PARAM_NAME - OBJSELSIZE
       PARAM_VALUE- is blank
    -> OLTPSOURCE - is blank
       PARAM_NAME - NOTSSELECT
       PARAM_VALUE- is blank
    -> OLTPSOURCE- 0CO_OM_OPA_6
       PARAM_NAME - NOBLOCKING
       PARAM_VALUE- is blank.
    Could you please check if any other settings needs to be done .
    Also for the IP there is selction criteris for FISCALYEAR/PERIOD from 2004-2099, also an inti is done for the same period as a result it becoming difficult for me to load for a single year.
    Please suggest.

    The problem was the index 4 was not active in the database level..it was recommended by the SAP team to activate it in se14..however while doing so we face few issues se14 is a very sensitive transaction should be handled carefully ... it should be activate not created.
    The OBJSELSIZE in the table BWOM_SETTINGS has to be Marked 'X' to improve the quality as well as the indexe 4 should be activate at the abap level i.e in the table COEP -> INDEXES-> INDEX 4 -> Select the  u201Cindex on all database systemu201D in place of u201CNo database indexu201D, once it is activated in the table abap level you can activate the same indexes in the database level.
    Be very carefull while you execute it in se14 best is to use db02 to do the same , basis tend to make less mistake there.
    Thanks Hope this helps ..

  • Delete Index in Process Chain Takes long time after SAP BI 7.0 SP 27

    After upgrading to SAP BI 7.0 SP 27 Delete index Process & Create index process in Process chain takes long time.
    For example : Delete index for 0SD_C03 takes around 55 minutes.
    Before SP upgrade it takes around 2 minutes to delete index from 0SD_C03.
    Regards
    Madhu P Menon

    Hi,
    Normally  index  creation or deletion can take long time in case  your database statistics are not updated properly, so can check  stat  after your data loading is completed and index generation is done,  Do creation of database statistics.
    Then try to recheck ...
    Regards,
    Satya

  • Database Connectivity takes long time if one of the Node is down .. ??

    Hello All,
    Env: 10.2.0.4 on Solaris 10
    I have 2 nodes.
    When Node1 server is down, it takes long time to connec to the database.
    tnsping would give "OK(2050ms)". Below is the tnsalias.
    RAC_test  =
      (DESCRIPTION =
         (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST=20.268.169.123)(PORT= 1521))
         (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST=20.268.169.127)(PORT= 1521))
         (LOAD_BALANCE = yes)
              (CONNECT_DATA =
            (SERVICE_NAME = DK.com)
          (FAILOVER_MODE =
            (TYPE = SELECT)
            (METHOD = BASIC)
            (RETRIES = 180)
            (DELAY = 5)
    )I put the trace on sqlnet.ora and found that first it pings to the "20.268.169.123",
    since the Server is down there will not be any reply and this consumes the delay and
    later it would ping "20.268.169.127" and connect to it.
    If i keep "20.268.169.127" above "20.268.169.123" in tnsalias, and keep "LOAD_BALANCE=no",
    it gets connected very fast, as its directly connecting to Node2. In tnsping i get Ok(40ms).
    How do i reduce the connect timing if i use the first step. Why does it take long time for
    Oracle Client to understand that the Node1 Server is down ?
    TIA,
    J J

    I hope the IP's you are using in the TNS are Virtual IP's.
    You must use Virtual IP's / hostnames for the failover to be quick. If Node 1 is not available then then it's (Node 1's) virtual IP would also get assigned to Node 2 hence all client connections are still able to get a response from the Node Virtual IP address without needing to wait for TCP/IP timeouts. This helps clients to get notified immediately that node 1 is unavailable and the connection tries the 2nd ip/host in the connect descriptor.
    Hope this helps.
    - Siba

  • SSRS 2012. ReportServer takes long time to be up.

    SSRS 2012 Sp1
    Hi guys,
    I am using SSRS as my reporting platform, but I have always got the following issue.
    SSRS ReportServer takes time to load.
    The first time takes long, then less time but only if the ReprotServer web page is continuosly retrived.
    HERE the problem:
    If the ReprotServer page is not used after a short time (let me say 10 min), the page takes long time to be up again.
    I have checked the configuration that is set as for default 12 hours.
    Is there a way to speed up the ReportServer opening page time?
    Thanks for your help 

    Hi Fasttrack2,
    According to your description, you want to optimize the performance of your report. Right?
    In this scenario, when your report page is not active for a short time, it will take long time to render again. This is because the you have the report timeout. You can select "Do not timeout report" in Processing. Please refer to the link below:
    SQL Server Reporting Services – Timeout Settings
    For the performance issue, it can be many reason cause the report running slowly. Please refer to the articles below to optimize the report:
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
    Reporting Services Performance and Optimization
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best Regards,
    Simon Hou

  • Why update query takes  long time ?

    Hello everyone;
    My update query takes long time.  In  emp  ( self testing) just  having 2 records.
    when i issue update query , it takes long time;
    SQL> select  *  from  emp;
      EID  ENAME     EQUAL     ESALARY     ECITY    EPERK       ECONTACT_NO
          2   rose              mca                  22000   calacutta                   9999999999
          1   sona             msc                  17280    pune                          9999999999
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.05
    SQL> update emp set esalary=12000 where eid='1';
    update emp set esalary=12000 where eid='1'
    * ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
    Elapsed: 00:01:11.72
    SQL> update emp set esalary=15000;
    update emp set esalary=15000
      * ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
    Elapsed: 00:02:22.27

    Hi  BCV;
    Thanks for your reply but it doesn't provide output,  please  see   this.
    SQL> update emp set esalary=15000;
    ........... Lock already occured.
    >> trying to trace  >>
    SQL> select HOLDING_SESSION from dba_blockers;
    HOLDING_SESSION
                144
    SQL> select sid , username, event from v$session where username='HR';
    SID USERNAME     EVENT
       144   HR    SQL*Net message from client
       151   HR    enq: TX - row lock contention
       159   HR    SQL*Net message from client
    >> It  does n 't  provide  clear output about  transaction lock >>
    SQL> SELECT username, v$lock.SID, TRUNC (id1 / POWER (2, 16)) rbs,
      2  BITAND (id1, TO_NUMBER ('ffff', 'xxxx')) + 0 slot, id2 seq, lmode,
      3  request
      4  FROM v$lock, v$session
      5  WHERE v$lock.TYPE = 'TX'
      6  AND v$lock.SID = v$session.SID
      7  AND v$session.username = USER;
      no rows selected
    SQL> select MACHINE from v$session where sid = :sid;
    SP2-0552: Bind variable "SID" not declared.

  • SELECT statement takes long time

    Hi All,
    In the following code, if the T_QMIH-EQUNR contains blank or space values ,SELECT statement takes longer time to acess the data from OBJK table. If it T_QMIH-EQUNR contains values other than blank, performance is good and it fetches data very fast.
    Already we have indexes for EQUNR in OBJK table.
    Only for blank entries , it takes much time.Can anybody tell why it behaves for balnk entries?
    if not T_QMIH[] IS INITIAL.
            SORT T_QMIH BY EQUNR.
            REFRESH T_OBJK.
            SELECT EQUNR OBKNR
              FROM OBJK INTO TABLE T_OBJK
              FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_QMIH
              WHERE OBJK~TASER = 'SER01' AND
             OBJK~EQUNR = T_QMIH-EQUNR.
    Thanks
    Ajay

    Hi
    You can use the field QMIH-QMNUM with OBJK-IHNUM
    in QMIH table, EQUNR is not primary key, it will have multiple entries
    so to improve the performance use one dummy internal table for QMIH  and sort it on EQUNR
    delete adjacent duplicates from d_qmih and use the same in for all entries
    this will improve the performance.
    Also use the fields in sequence of the index and primary keys also in select
    if not T_QMIH[] IS INITIAL.
    SORT T_QMIH BY EQUNR.
    REFRESH T_OBJK.
    SELECT EQUNR OBKNR
    FROM OBJK INTO TABLE T_OBJK
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_QMIH
    WHERE  IHNUM =  T_QMIH-QMNUM
    OBJK~TASER = 'SER01' AND
    OBJK~EQUNR = T_QMIH-EQUNR.
    try this and let me know
    regards
    Shiva

  • Oracle report formatting takes long time

    hi
    i am using oracle 10g Application Server 9.0.4.0.0 on Red hat linux AS 3
    oracle reports are run thru JSP's
    some reports take long time to execute though query in it if executed on sql plus are fast.
    it is fond that that formatting is going on for those reports
    what might be the reason for this??
    is the data fetched first and then formatting takes place as per data??
    waiting for reply
    Avinash

    hi
    i am using oracle 10g Application Server 9.0.4.0.0 on Red hat linux AS 3
    oracle reports are run thru JSP's
    some reports take long time to execute though query in it if executed on sql plus are fast.
    it is fond that that formatting is going on for those reports
    what might be the reason for this??
    is the data fetched first and then formatting takes place as per data??
    waiting for reply
    Avinash

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is it possible to have my text messages sent to my email as well?  or is there a way to view them other than on the phone?

    is it possible to have my text messages sent to my email as well?  or is there a way to view them other than on the phone?

  • Ordering albums within folders

    When I drag albums within folders sometimes they go to where I want them, sometimes they just snap back to the top of the list. From other fora this seems to be a definite bug. 1) Anybody know otherwise? 2) There used to be an option to report bugs i

  • Cheat sheet for netcfg2 keywords

    In the netcfg2 thread, it seems like the experts are just arbitrarily pulling keywords out of thin air. Is it EXCLUSIVE=yes, or NETWORK-EXCLUSIVE, or both?!? This is pretty distressing for a no0b like me. Is there a master list somewhere that no one

  • Win 7 File issues and Netware.

    I'm not sure if this is the correct place to post this issue. I dont even know where the problem is coming from. Our main server is netware 6.5 and zcm10. With windows 7 clients and a few XP clients. When students save their work (for example Word) a

  • DreamWeaver CS5 Crashes In Code View

    So, I've upgraded from CS4 to CS5, and everything was working fine for a month, but yesterday DW5 seems to be crashing evertime I click on a specific ASP page, in code view, and more specifically in the vbscript section of that page. I can be anywher