Discovered: Method of running full screen on 13" MBP

Been running my MBP 13" with Logic recently and decided to look into a way of getting it full screen, and think i've found a solution.
Now, what i will be doing is instead of displaying the standard 1280x800 resolution, i will instead display a scaled 1920x1200 resolution via a piece of software called 'SwitchResX'.  Which is a systems preference.
It gives you much more screen space to work with, but at the cost of fonts are quite hard to read, being a scaled resolution, so if you're interested here are the steps:
i. Download SwitchResX from here: http://www.madrau.com/download/latest/latest.html  Please note: it is shareware which means you can use it as much as you like, but it's requested that you pay if using over 10 days.  So please do so if it works for you, and you use it in future.
ii. Simply run the resulting download and it will install to your system preferences.
Right, now here we go:
1. Run SwitchResX from the system preferences window.
2. Select 'Color LCD' (Which is your internal laptop screen) from the list on the left.
3. Go to the custom resolutions tab, and press the plus button at the lower left to add a new custom resolution.
4. From the pull down menu select 'Scaled resolution'.
5. Then in the scale to boxes, enter 1920 and 1200 as displayed below, and press OK:
6. The new resolution will be displayed as not saved, so simply press the apply button at the bottom right and it will make the changes to your mac - Will probably ask for a password to do so.
7.  Restart OSX, and you will be running at 1920x1200 full screen.  You can swap between that and the standard 1280x800 modes at will in the standard System Prefs/Display control panels (Under the scale option)
I hope this helps some of you, not sure if the MBP will run hotter like that, it shouldn't be any different than running it through an external monitor at that kind of resolution i would hope.
If anyone foresee's any issues this could cause please post back, i've been running with it tonight and it's really handy being able to see more mix controls etc.

Very cool bit of clever work...
Thanks ski!

Similar Messages

  • Automatically run full screen?

    My Captivate simulation has to be run full screen. Rather
    than having a page with links where the learner can click, the
    links must be embedded into a PowerPoint presentation (I know, I
    know, but that's what they want). My client wants to avoid having
    the Internet Explorer window open with a "Click here ... full
    screen" link. I can think of know way to put that in a PPT file, so
    I'm wondering if anyone has made the IE window redirect to the full
    screen version with a re-direct code (or something) to
    automatically launch the simulation in full screen. (Whew! Does
    that make sense?)
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi LJezsik and welcome to the forums!
    Full screen in the browser is only available by opening a new
    window (hence the "Full Screen" link) or by embedding a custom
    ActiveX control.
    I'd rule out the ActiveX option, since it's both technically
    challenging (I saw it done once, but don't know how) and would only
    work for Internet Explorer anyhow.
    That leaves the new window approach. A redirect is not an
    option... the "full screen" can only be applied while a window is
    first opening and even then only when the window is opened by
    Javascript.
    The best you could hope for is to open a page that
    immediately opens another page in full screen, adding some verbiage
    to the first page that says something like "The content has opened
    in a new window. It is safe to close this window".
    A sample "autolauncher" page is included below as an example.
    It does not make use of the window.open() method's "fullscreen"
    parameter since in IE6 that does not seem to give the user a way of
    closing the new window once it's open. You can easily change this
    by setting the parameter to yes in the code below.

  • Run full screen video with GarageBand

    Good evening.
    I have a question about using GaraBand with full screen video.
    I'm creating a movie using Final Cut Pro (which's new for me) and creating a music track in Garageband.
    I will like to have GarageBand to play the music in one track, using an interface I will send a click to the drumer but also ( and this is part of my question), I need to have GaraBand to play the sync movie I created, on a video beam running in full screen.
    The goal is to manage the application in my laptop but the people should not see the application or anything on my desktop, they should be able to see just the video after I hit play.
    So, is there a way to have GarageBand to send a clik to the drummer mintor, play the sound track and do split monitor on a video beam that should show just the full screen movie and not my desktop?
    I will really appreciate any suggestion about this.
    Note: I have Logic Pro 8 too, in case logic supports it.

    Thank you for taking a look into this question Chris.
    This is the very first time I'm trying to do this type of presentations and I'm not sure if there is a way or another application to run a music track with a click only for monitoring of the drummer (which GB does) and at the same time run the video which was edited to by synchronized with the audio the musicians will play.
    I can see the the movie preview window and make it larger, the problem is that it will not pay in full screen  move on a video beam.
    I'm starting to feel that with GB it is not possible.

  • When running full screen apps - dock is slow, difficult to appear

    This is on a new MBP with an additional external monitor.  The primary display is still the laptop display.  When apps are in full screen, simply bringing the cursor to the bottom of the screen does NOT bring up the dock.  I have to continually pull down on the mouse to get it to appear.  Or I have to pull the mouse down to the bottom, stop, then pull it down again.  This seems to be in place to allow access to features at the very bottom of the window of a full screen app...whithout accidentally bumping the dock.  Maybe there's a setting for this but in it's current state, I hate it - I'm not going to use full screen apps if this is how they act.

    Revealing the Dock while in a full-screen app requires not only moving the cursor to the bottom of the screen, but keeping your finger on it or moving the cursor along the bottom edge (or other "tricks") to reveal the Dock.
    SUPER ANNOYING TO ME
    Many users may like that way of operation, perhaps a great majority. But hundreds of thousands may find it annoying to have this cognitive pause imposed and would rather have the dock appear accidently once in a while when moving the cursor close to the bottom area of the display.
    This worked before Mavericks:
    Setting the Dock autohide delay to zero (in Terminal, with write defaults...) removed this annoyance. As soon as your cursor's at the bottom of the screen, the Dock's there.
    In Mavericks: Nothing to do! (so far)
    APPLE: "You" make WRONG design decisions, "you" make professional users spend dozens of hours investigating how to tweak basic features behind the scenes. And THEN, "you" quietly invalidate those changes. Please, the best design decision that "you" could make is to give the user more choice. Please, give us a section in Preferences where these things may be changed. The religious dumbing down of the interface in favour of supposedly clean esthetics is plain WRONG.
    It is also quite unacceptable that APPLE does read these pages but never responds.

  • Is there any way to minimize/hide games when they're running full screen?

    so i'm a seasoned mac user, but i've always wanted to be able to do this, i've tried virtuedesktops to try and switch screens, but whatever i do, i have to quit the game if i want to change something on my desktop. that, or run it in a window, which kinda s u c k s. i know in windows you can minimize anything by hitting the window key. things like apple-tab don't work either. there must be some way to do this!

    That seems to depend on the game. Certain games seem to disable your ability to switch tasks. But what you could try is to induce the Force Quit (command-option-escape) dialog. If my experience serves correct, this seems to override whatever wants to prevent multi-tasking.

  • Any way to make games run full screen/higher res on intel iMac?

    Hi,
    I just got i 17" intel imac and am pleased with it exept that all the games run with a black band down either side of the screen and only seem to play at 1024 x 768. Is there any way of isorting this out? Doom 3 for example keeps returning to 800 x 600 if i change the settings?
    Thanks.

    take a look at this thread, you can find some useful info about running old and some new games on Booklet there.

  • Can't run flash player in full screen on 2nd monitor

    Hi all! I have a laptop with dual video displays. The main
    display is the laptop's LCD and the 2nd display is a 19" LCD
    connected via VGA cable. I want to let a Flash movie loop endlessly
    on the second monitor while I continue to work on the laptop. When
    I drag Flash Player 8 over to the 2nd monitor and start the movie,
    I can hit maxmize and it will take up the entire 2nd montior as it
    should...with the file options and boarder around as expected. I
    then hit Ctrl-F to go full screen and it snaps directly to the
    laptop's primary monitor. I tried it at work where my desktop has 2
    displays and the same thing happens. I need to force Flash player
    to run full screen on the 2nd monitor and cannot find a way to
    accomplish this. Any help is appreciated because it's driving me
    nuts. I can always make the external monitor my primary but then
    the start button and all my icons move there too and that is not
    acceptable. Thanx!

    Seriously? No one has any thoughts about this? I can't
    believe I would be the first to come across this issue.

  • Running flash full screen while using other apps

    I run a 3 monitor setup on Win7x64.  I would like to watch shows, eg Hulu, while working on other stuff on the other monitors.  Any time I switch focus to another program though it drops back down into the browser.  Is there a way to keep it running full screen while working with other programs?

    Hi, here is a thread where it was discussed and the person that answered should know.
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/2716538#2716538
    You might take a look on the right hand side under "More like this" just to see what others have to say even tho there doesn't seem to be a solution to this.
    Thanks,
    eidnolb

  • Problem in hp 630 laptop abt games not running in full screen [1366 * 768 inches]

    i have hp 630 laptop  2nd gen. core i3. window7  32 bit.    intel graphics 3000 . [1366 * 768 inches screen ].
      can  any1 please advise me how to make the game to run full sreen [need for speed- most wanted, black ed.] .many games can run full screen in my laptop but this is my fav. game n  it is not running full screen  [ black on sides while running game]   i hv used many settings of games n graphic card both but it doesn't work full screen   . so plz help me how can i play it full screen .  

    I got the solution at last. I was having the same problem for a long time. You will get the solution here

  • How to have new Safari windows open in full screen?

    Hello,
    I am wondering if it is possible to have new Safari windows take up the full screen. For example, if I click on a link that opens a new window, I would like that new window to take on the fully maximized setting of the window it came from. So even if the website code says the window has to be 50% screen real estate, I would like to be 100% every time automatically.
    Thanks.

    Welcome to the forums!
    Yet another great thing that Glims can do!
    If you want to fix your Google search to a specific Google location, I recommend that you download and install the free plug-in Glims:
    http://www.machangout.com/
    which not only does that but much more equally useful stuff! (Such as automatically deleting Flash cookies, enabling Safari to run full-screen, and more.)
    (It adds items to Safari Preferences).
    Not only does it already list a number of search engines and regions, but you can also add any other search engine not already listed in Glims by using the method described here:
    http://www.machangout.com/tutorials/addsearchengine
    Just enter the name you give the search engine in the name field, and the URL for it in the Query URL field.
    When you have it, the setting is in Glims Preferences/General

  • MISSION CONTROL, LAUNCHPAD, and FULL SCREEN APPS (one month later)

    I'm pretty good embracing a new thing when it comes along.  I downloaded LION the day it come out, which was over a month ago at this point. On that day, I immediately found MISSION CONTROL and LAUNCHPAD both uninituitve and pointless.  Unhandy iCandy.   And of FULL SCREEN APPS?  Not necessary on an iMac anyway.
    So I quickly sought out quick solutions to 'fix' these new features.  Launchpad and full screen apps have the advantage that they can be simply ignored.  This is a good thing.  Mission Control, on the other hand, got in the way of a beloved feature for me:  what was once SPACES and EXPOSE.  That is, I couldn't simply ignore MC because I still needed the previous helpful features in Snow Leopard.
    My solution was kind of surprising and eye-opening.  It's complicated to explain but I thought I'd share.  This conclusion is likely best suited for someone not using a small screened Mac.  It turns out that most users (with big enough screens) don't really need Mission Control, Launchpad, Spaces, or Full Screen apps. 
    At all.
    Let's go through that conclusion, one by one:
    FULL SCREEN APPS
    If you have a relatively big screen (20 iMac for instance), why do you need Safari full screen?  Unless you intend to sit across the room from the computer, no reason.  And there's lots of bright empty space when you do this.  Do you need the Mail app full screen?  If you need reading glasses, maybe, but otherwise, nope.  I find it's easier just to stretch out an app pretty big and leave it at that.
    Full screen apps DO offer a nice feature which is making your desktop, menubar, and dock go BYE BYE.  I can see where sometimes this is a useful feature, but typically -- NOPE.  Typically I want access to my dock (to switch between open apps without the added step of cancelling full screen first), and typically I want access to my menubar so that I can glance up and see what time it is or find an app menu quickly.
    The only feature I find worthy of praise with full screen apps is that they hide the clutter on your desktop.  But there's an app in the Mac App Store which makes your desktop icons vanish with the touch of a button (CAMOUFLAGE).  I mean, what's the point of a wallpaper if you bury it with desktop clutter or eliminate it with full screen apps?  If it's a busy and distracting wallpaper, umm... you picked bad wallpaper.
    LAUNCH PAD
    LAUNCH PAD offers an iOS experience inside OS X.  At first I thought it was completely silly.  After a month now, I kinda get why it's there.  Kinda.
    You see, before LP, to duplicate it's functionality, you'd have to organize folders yourself.  Put folders of various apps together.  Place them somewhere in the finder heirarchy.  Then drag those folders into the part of the dock with the trashcan.  Then you could click them open and have access to similarly themed folders of apps.  The problem here, of course, is that unless you're a power user, you'll never do this.
    So Apple thought, AH-HA, we'll just drag into OS X a paradigm that users already get from iOS.  Clumping apps together any way you like them.  The misfire, if you ask me, is not allowing users to drag the new iOS folders straight into the dock when finished.  That is to say:  copies of said organized folders.  It's as if Apple's software people have complete contempt for the dock -- and are desperate to have users abandon it.
    My problem is that I like having folders in my dock of stuff I need.  It just works, as Steve says.  Going to the same EXACT place every time I need anything is more intuitive and graceful than ADDING an app called Launchpad that launches you into a different finder altogether.  Makes zero sense and THIS is why I say, like FULL SCREEN APPS, LP can basically be abandoned.
    By the way:  need proof that Apple has complete contempt for the Dock?
    MISSION CONTROL/SPACES
    A month has passed since MC was introduced and SPACES was eliminated.  I dare anyone to tell me why either is needed at all.  Before you get iMiffed, humor me for a moment and hear me out.
    The notion of SPACES was that it's a neat way to keep like minded open apps together.  I totally bought into this, back in the day.  So much so that I was iMiffed when it was gone in Lion.  But let's look at this closer.
    The REASON why we needed SPACES was that we could have WAY too many windows open at once on a Mac.  Right?  A big mess of windows covering each other up.  Suppose you're surfing in Safari but need iTunes?  But iTunes is hidden.  So what did you do?  You went to Spaces as step one, moused over to your iTunes space as move two, and then clicked it as move three.  Seems like a great solution until the day you discover that you could simply click on iTunes in the dock as move one and arrive at iTunes.  As one step.  Period.  Really simple, right? 
    Why have Spaces and apps dance around when you can just click the app you want and be done with it?  That's the critical observation to make in order to follow my entire line of reasoning.  Sure, it may look really cool and make Windows machines look like junk, but at the end of the day, why add two steps to something you might do 100 times a day -- switching between apps.
    So why OH why did Apple add Spaces?  Simple:  because too many apps were visible at once in one 'desktop' window.  So if you can build many new desktops, there might only be one or two in each.  Great solution.  Right?
    Wrong, as it turns out.  Because we still have the two extra steps.  It's a weak solution.  And it's in complete contempt of the Dock, which as it turns out, offers the strongest solution.
    The strong solution would be that only one app is visible in your Mac's window at all times.  Say you're in Safari.  Despite having 12 other apps open, you only see Safari.  Your dock tells you that you have other apps open, but nothing else sits in your window BUT the app you're using.  So you want to go to iTunes?  So click on it in the dock and Safari vanishes and iTunes emerges by itself.  No other windows.  What could be simpler?  (This app is freeware known as ISOLATOR.)
    If you download and try ISOLATOR, you'll say, umm, okay, but wait:  sometimes I do want more than one window in view.  Okay, fine, turn it off then.  From the handy menu bar menu.  I find that 98% of the time I need ISOLATOR on.  Mileage may vary.
    So let's recap.  One third party software removes distracting desktop clutter, the other removes distracting app windows.  Both can be toggled on and off from the menu bar.  One is free, one costs $2.  These two solutions remove the only real feature of FULL SCREEN APPS and make SPACES and it's newfangled cousin MISSION CONTROL pointless.
    Need that last one explained?  Well, what's Mission Control but a variant of spaces?  To invoke MC and switch to the needed window are those same two annoying steps Spaces added into the mix.  Nothing was fixed.  Plus, like spaces, you must invest time and energy organizing such spaces.
    Why bother?  And so I ask again:  can somebody who's read and tried the above carefully explain to me why Mission Control, Launchpad, and Full Screen Apps are really needed at all?  (Outside of small screened Macs.)  Doesn't the dock and these two sharewares together solve most problems?
    Am I missing something?

    I agree with everything you said about full screen apps, mission control and launchpad. For apps that made sense to run full screen, they already could under SL. Launchpad is totally unnecessary and Mission Control is a mere shadow of Expose and Spaces.
    However, I feel you have not given due credit to Spaces. The point of Spaces is to let one organise logical desktops for different tasks, not just a way to reduce the number of windows on display. For example, I have a Space for software development where I run Xcode and the iPhone simulator, a Firefox window showing perhaps documentation or some other websites pertaining to software development, a Finder window that is opened in the folder with my design docs. I have another Space where I have the remote login sessions, yet another Space with another Firefox window where I do general surfing and emailing. I can switch between these spaces using a keyboard shortcut, which is much quicker than having to lift my hand off the keyboard, move it over to the mouse, move the mouse pointer over the Dock, find the app and click on it, only to find that it has switched to the wrong window of the app.
    Without Spaces, organisation of my desktop is disrupted each time I want to switch task, whereas Spaces allows me to drop everything I am doing, go and do something completely different for a while and go back to my exact previous environment. I have a 27" iMac so am not short of screen space but I use Spaces extensively. BTW, switching Spaces using a keyboard shortcut is a lot faster on SL than the equivalent on Lion, thanks to the gratuitous screen animation of the latter.

  • I've given up on Full Screen Apps

    At first I was very annoyed at the built-in rigidity of full screen apps. We called it a bug (it's not- no one at Apple cared to give the apps the flexibility they should have) and I hoped for a fix, but with so many desktops available and the full screen mode available anyway (you know, the green button), I realized that Full Screen Apps weren't really giving me anything worth the trouble and often were making work more cumbersome. The question is, what do Full Screen really offer anyway? They seem redundant. The only app I still run full screen is Safari- you need every bit of space you can get with a browser.
    Besides, what advantage were Full Screen apps supposed to give us anyway? Four finger swipe navigation? You can do that anyway between desktops. As far as app switching is concerned, I find Cmmd-Tab the most convenient method by far and so my dock is hardly used and always hidden anyway. I find too that I like to see the menu bar when working. I don't find the elegant quotient damaged.
    But I take back what I say about bugs- Preview has huge bugs in Full Screen mode and annoying ones in regular mode. I have no idea why Cupertino hasn't addressed these glaring ugly's. Speaking of butt-ugly, try Photo Booth in Full Sreen mode. It seems a Cupertino high school came to Apple for a field trip one day and recolored Photo Booth and iCal as well. Notice how Word jumped in the pleather wood action- jeez, can't they even get wood grain right? Even I can do a decent and realistic pine, oak, and teak.
    In respone to the dumbing down and corkscewing up of Mac OS I've threatened to switch to Ubutntu a bunch of times but apparently Apple is calling my bluff as a loyal user since they haven't made any public announcements or written to me personally (these are attempts at jokes I'm afraid, I'm planning on buying a Macbook Pro as I write this).
    I like eye candy too but to Hector with that Photon-blasted iOS. When did Apple become the computer trendy gadgetier for the everybody and his brother and dog instead the beloved champion for the rest of us wannabe geeks? Sigh, nostalgia.

    I've come to think that if you know what html is and have ever needed to use ftp, then iWeb will seem limiting and downright constraining.
    On the other hand, I can truly say that were it not for iWeb, I wouldn't be blogging now. I can edit html by hand and have spent some time in .css, but when I'm doing something just for the heck of it (to make myself, and hopefully the readers, smile), I want the "effort" part of the equation to be as low as possible.
    Like Keynote before it, there's something about iWeb that makes me want to use it. And creating with it is fun mainly because, while the results may not be perfect, the only thinking that goes into the creation is that of creating. And, since the Domain file is where all your data is held, an update to iWeb means that the next time you publish, your site automatically takes on whatever optimizations the update holds, again without having to tinker with the coding side of site creation.

  • Crome - stuck in full screen on Second display

    Hello
    I am in need of some help here.
    I have a dual screen set up
    Main display - Apple 30" display
    Second display - Apple 23" display
    At one point I have enabled full screen mode with Google Crome on my 23" display and I can't get it out of Full Screen.
    I have quit Crome and tried to start it holding down different keys - Command, option and also control, (alone not together)
    No change, still runs full screen
    UGH - hate it.
    I have tried 'esc' and the blue arrows in the upper right of the screen both did not help.
    Thanks
    West
    Running 10.9.2 all up to date

    Chrome Support

  • Is it possible to change the size of the 'Close' button in Full Screen viewing mode?

    I am currently using Firefox for a kiosk type scenario. We require that the browser run full screen. The issue is that the 'Close' button is not large enough for users to consistently see, so they're having issues figuring out how to close an active browser window.
    Can anyone tell me if it's possible to change this icon? I've tried using themes, but they tend to theme everything but the close button.
    Custom configuration details are below.
    Firefox version: firefox-3.0.4-1.el5.centos
    Customisations:
    Access to local drives disabled:
    Modified the contents of /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.4/chrome/browser.jar, so that browser.js has the added stanza:
    <pre><nowiki>if (location.match(/^file:/) ||
    location.match(/^\//) ||
    location.match(/^resource:/) ||
    (!location.match(/^about:blank/) &&
    location.match(/^about:/))) {
    loadURI("about:blank");
    }</nowiki></pre>
    Various menus & bookmarks disabled in chrome/userChrome.css
    <pre><nowiki>/* Kill "normal" bookmark icons in the bookmarks menu */
    menuitem.bookmark-item > .menu-iconic-left {
    display: none;
    /* kill icons for bookmark folders in Bookmarks menu */
    menu.bookmark-item > .menu-iconic-left {
    display: none;
    /* kill icons for bookmark groups in Bookmarks menu */
    menuitem.bookmark-group > .menu-iconic-left {
    display: none;
    /* Remove the Edit and Help menus
    Id's for all toplevel menus:
    file-menu, edit-menu, view-menu, go-menu, bookmarks-menu, tools-menu, helpMenu */
    helpMenu { display: none !important; }
    tools-menu { display: none !important; }
    file-menu { display: none !important; }
    edit-menu { display: none !important; }
    view-menu { display: none !important; }
    go-menu { display: none !important; }
    bookmarks-menu { display: none !important; }
    #autohide-context { display: none !important;}
    #bookmarksToolbarFolderMenu { display: none !important;}
    #organizeBookmarksSeparator { display: none !important;}
    .tabbrowser-tabs .tab-icon {
    display: none;
    #urlbar {
    font-family: Arial !important;
    color: Black !important;
    font-size: 26 !important; }</nowiki></pre>

    Try code like this:
    <pre><nowiki>#window-controls .toolbarbutton-icon {
    width: 25px !important;
    height: 25px !important;
    </nowiki></pre>
    The three buttons have these IDs:
    <pre><nowiki>#minimize-button
    #restore-button
    #close-button</nowiki></pre>

  • Full screen vertical scroller sometimes works, sometimes doesn't

    Curious to know if anyone else has had this problem or there's some information that my elucidate this mystery:
    Our publication ran a page with a full-screen vertical scrolling overlay today for the iPad. Inside of Viewer the folio flipped from page to page just fine, but once published we were unable to move between pages any longer once on this particular page. We've run full-screen vertical overlays before without incident and we're stumped to understand why the Viewer elicited no issues while the final publication did.
    I put this question to you, Forum: Any thoughts?

    Hey Lightgarden,
    Welcome to Apple Support Communities.
    From what I gather, your iPhone 4s intermittently stops responding and displays a blank black screen. If you haven’t already, take a look at the article linked below and try the troubleshooting suggestions that it provides.
    If your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch doesn't respond or doesn't turn on - Apple Support
    If your device doesn't respond when you press buttons
    Your device might not return to the Home screen when you press the Home button, wake from sleep when you press the Sleep/Wake button, slide to unlock or power off, or it might appear frozen. Try these steps:
    Restart your device.
    If it still doesn't respond, or if it doesn't turn back on, reset your device.
    Get more help
    If you still need help after trying the steps above, contact Apple Support.
    Cheers,
    -Jason

Maybe you are looking for

  • Wrror while running financial report in workspace

    Hi, The following error is keep coming and obstructing the financial report output in workspace. 1001:datasourceName=Totp;errorMsg=Essbase Error;hasPovDims=1;povXML=<?xml version="1.0"?><datasources><datasource name="Totp" dsid="6085212f_1277909fb31_

  • Topic: Incorrect Tag:Multiple Attributes with Same Collection Type

    I have an Object Type that contains multiple attributes with the same collection type. When I use OracleXML getXML to generate xml, the tag for all elements created for any of the matching types is the tag for the 1st of the similar attributes. work_

  • Query on File Transport

    Hi Experts, We are using files as the method of transports. We have 4 environments. Dev, Test, UAT, Prod. We have already done a file transport from Dev to Test. Now we are in the process of moving objects to UAT. The question do we need to do one mo

  • Configuration in SM12

    SAP 4.7 6.20 Windows Server 2008 - Oracle 10g Hello, When I start transaction SM12 to see the lock list I have the following information : Client, User, Time, Mode, Table and Lock argument... Is it possible to include the transaction code in this lis

  • E-Recruitment Presentation or Demo

    Hello, I have searched, but have not found a good presentation or demo on E-Recruitment.  I have found a white paper or two from SAP and that's about it.  I would be interested if someone could point me to a good presentation either by SAP or by othe