Discoverer Report

Dear Sir,
Can i access the report from cyber cafe(Web Enabled) that is generated with oracle 9i Discoverer. If YES then How ?
If NO then Why
OR
any other version from which we can access the report from cyber cafe that created with discoverer

Is it Correct " If You Don't have Licence copy of oracle S/w then u can use only development not for production for production you must have licence copy of oracle."

Similar Messages

Open Pages from Discoverer Report

Hi,
Is there a way to invoke a webpage or even better, an oracle function (that links to forms or self-service) from a discoverer report row ?
for example, I want a report for employees where the person looking at the report will click on the employee name and is taken straight to the person details page for that employee.
Regards.

Hi,
You can create a link to a form function using fnd_run_function.get_run_function_url. You can create a calculation either in a view or using a calculated item in the EUL (you will have to map the get_run_function_url in the EUL to do this). You then set the content type property of the EUL item to FILE so that when the item is selected in the workbook it appears as a hyperlink.
Most forms in apps except parameters so that you can pass the employee id to the form and the form will open up with the employee record. For example, if you are using a seed HR person form you create a calculation,
fnd_run_function.get_run_function_url(3494      -- PERWSHRG-404
                                     ,800       -- HR
                                     ,fnd_global.RESP_ID     -- caller's responsibility
                                     ,0        -- Business Group
                                     ,         -- Parameters
     'P_PERSON_ID='||TO_CHAR(person_id, 'fm9999999999999')||
     ' P_EFFECTIVE_DATE='||TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'YYYY/MM/DD'))Rod West

Discoverer report not working on R12 !

We have just migrated to R12 from 11i and some of the discoverer query is not working, but the same is working fine when we ran thru SQL Developer or TOAD.
Is there any context (mo_global.set_policy_context) needs to be set in Discoverer report to get the data?
Thanks

Thanks Srini,
There is no any specific error message, the strange thing is if I run the Discoverer report is not returning any data, but if I set the mo_global.set_policy_context ('S',111) in SQL Developer or TOAD and then run the discoverer report it return data...
Any pointers?

Discoverer Report parameter based on subquery

Hi Guys,
I have following query which i need to convert into discoverer report
select hpah.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER,hpah.FIRST_NAME,hpah.LAST_NAME,hpah.PERSON_NAME,
--hpah.JOB_NAME,hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_NAME,
hpah.ASSIGNMENT_TYPE,hpah.USER_ASSIGNMENT_STATUS,
SUBSTR(pj.name, 1, instr(pj.name, '.', 1, 2) -1) job_code,
SUBSTR(pj.name, instr(pj.name, '.', 1, 2) + 1) job_title,
(select haou.ATTRIBUTE1 from hr_all_organization_units haou
where haou.ORGANIZATION_ID = hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_ID ) Function,
(select haou.ATTRIBUTE2 from hr_all_organization_units haou
where haou.ORGANIZATION_ID = hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_ID ) org_desc,
SUBSTR(hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_NAME, 1, 6) dept_code,
SUBSTR(hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_NAME, 7, LENGTH(hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_NAME)) dept_title,
hpah.GRADE_NAME,hpah.LOCATION_NAME,hpah.SUPERVISOR_NAME,
hpah.PERSON_START_DATE,hpah.ORIGINAL_DATE_OF_HIRE ,
hpah.SALARY_BASIS,hpah.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID,hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ID,
decode( hpah.SALARY_BASIS, 'ANNUAL', ppp.proposed_salary_n,
'HOURLY', (ppp.proposed_salary_n *2080),
ppp.proposed_salary_n
) salary,
sysdate run_date
from
hrfg_person_assignment_history hpah ,
per_pay_proposals ppp,
per_pay_bases ppb,
per_grades pg,
per_jobs pj
where hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ID = ppp.ASSIGNMENT_ID
and hpah.SALARY_BASIS = ppb.PAY_BASIS
and hpah.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID = ppb.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID
and hpah.GRADE_ID = pg.GRADE_ID(+)
and hpah.JOB_ID = pj.JOB_ID (+)
--and hpah.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER = 100779
and hpah.PERSON_START_DATE IN
(SELECT MAX(hpah2.PERSON_START_DATE)
FROM hrfg_person_assignment_history hpah2
WHERE hpah2.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER = hpah.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER
AND hpah2.PERSON_START_DATE <= sysdate )
order by hpah.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER
i need to have sysdate as parameter in my report. I want data based on the date i provide.
how can i make this as an parameter?

Hi Prashant,
Subqueries are not Supported in Conditions..As of Disco Plus Rel 10.1.2.54.25
A plausible workaround can be:
1. Create a View with foll. Query
create or replace view TEST_VIEW as
select hpah.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER emp_no,hpah.FIRST_NAME,hpah.LAST_NAME,hpah.PERSON_NAME,
--hpah.JOB_NAME,hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_NAME,
hpah.ASSIGNMENT_TYPE,hpah.USER_ASSIGNMENT_STATUS,
SUBSTR(pj.name, 1, instr(pj.name, '.', 1, 2) -1) job_code,
SUBSTR(pj.name, instr(pj.name, '.', 1, 2) + 1) job_title,
(select haou.ATTRIBUTE1 from hr_all_organization_units haou
where haou.ORGANIZATION_ID = hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_ID ) Function,
(select haou.ATTRIBUTE2 from hr_all_organization_units haou
where haou.ORGANIZATION_ID = hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_ID ) org_desc,
SUBSTR(hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_NAME, 1, 6) dept_code,
SUBSTR(hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_NAME, 7, LENGTH(hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ORGANIZATION_NAME)) dept_title,
hpah.GRADE_NAME,hpah.LOCATION_NAME,hpah.SUPERVISOR_NAME,
hpah.PERSON_START_DATE,hpah.ORIGINAL_DATE_OF_HIRE ,
hpah.SALARY_BASIS,hpah.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID,hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ID,
decode( hpah.SALARY_BASIS, 'ANNUAL', ppp.proposed_salary_n,
'HOURLY', (ppp.proposed_salary_n *2080),
ppp.proposed_salary_n
) salary,
sysdate run_date
from
hrfg_person_assignment_history hpah ,
per_pay_proposals ppp,
per_pay_bases ppb,
per_grades pg,
per_jobs pj
where hpah.ASSIGNMENT_ID = ppp.ASSIGNMENT_ID
and hpah.SALARY_BASIS = ppb.PAY_BASIS
and hpah.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID = ppb.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID
and hpah.GRADE_ID = pg.GRADE_ID(+)
and hpah.JOB_ID = pj.JOB_ID (+)
--and hpah.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER = 100779
order by hpah.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER
2. Create another table say TEST_TAB
create table TEST_TAB (emp_no, start_dt) as
SELECT hpah2.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER , MAX(hpah2.PERSON_START_DATE) PERSON_START_DATE
FROM hrfg_person_assignment_history hpah2
GROUP BY hpah2.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER
3. Add both of them in Disco Admin and create a join between TEST_VIEW.emp_no and TEST_TAB.emp_no
4. Bring both these Objects in a new report in Disco Plus
5. Create a New Parameter (Base it on PERSON_START_DATE Col of TEST_TAB)
6. Choose Option Create Condition with operator <=
7. Checkmark "Require User to Enter a Value
8. Execute Report
I believe this should work. Either ways let me know if it helps or u get another workaround. (This scenario looks quite interesting)
Thanks,
Chinmay

Discoverer Report Slow

Hi All,
I have a problem wherein some specific users are saying that the report is slow at their end.
The exact issue is...we have Discoverer Report present at the US server. Now we have 2 sites CANADA and US from where this report is run. Both sites refer the same server i.e. the US server.
Canadian users are reporting performance problems with this report, but when I run the report at my end there is no such problem.
Please advice what can be the probable reason for this.
Regards,
Ankur

Hi Ankur
Further to what has been said, if you are running Discoverer Plus across a long time it will take longer to run. Typically the query runs within the database but everything else, formatting, layout, page items and so on is done locally by the Java applet in your local cache. What happens if you run a CANADA report from the US site? Does it run ok? If so, then therein lies the answer. The machines in Canada need to therefore be as powerful as you can make them plus your network needs to be as fast as you can too.
Another way way I have seen this solved is by providing something like a Citrix server in the US for the Canadian customers to log into.
Best wishes
Michael

Discoverer report link

Hi guys,
I have created a link to Discoverer report in applications that works beautifully but there is one downside in it. When we invoike the report to launch in Discoverer Viewer it opens in the same browser window. Does anyone know how to make it open in a new browser window? I have looked into ICX: Discoverer parameters and other profile options but could not find anything pertaining to that. Also looked into Function parameters but seems to be missing it. Help, anybody!
Thanks in advance.

hey, follow this Note for 11i: Note:278095.1 or this one for r12: Note:471303.1

Discoverer Report returning ' no data found '

Hi ...
i have an issue with one discoverer report .
Discoverer report name : EDI Price Exception Report.
when i ran the report in Discoverer Desktop edition It is returning 'No Data Found ' But i am taken the Query from admin edition and tried to ran in PL/SQL Developer/TOAD by setting Org_id condition
it's returning Data . the Desktop Edition of Discoverer for some specific date Range it's giving Data But from last month on wards it's not returning any Data.
in Discoverer Report Desktop it's not retuning the Data from November to till date
Oracle Applications 11i
Discoverer 4i
Oracle Data base :9i
OS : Windows.
Attached the Sql which i used to generate the Report :
I HAVE USED THE FOLLOWING :-for initialize the profile options
EXEC FND_GLOBAL.APPS_INITIALIZE (0,52163,660);
EXEC APPS.FND_CLIENT_INFO.SET_ORG_CONTEXT(2922);
SELECT A.CUST_PO_NUMBER,
         A.ORDER_NUMBER,
         A.ORDERED_DATE,
         A.ORDER_TYPE,
         -- C.CUSTOMER_ID,
         C.CUSTOMER_NUMBER,
         C.CUSTOMER_NAME,
         B.LINE_NUMBER,
         B.ORDERED_ITEM,
         MSI.SEGMENT1 ACCO_ITEM,                               -- GRW 20060407
         MSI.DESCRIPTION,
         -- MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID,
         (SELECT MCI.CUSTOMER_ITEM_NUMBER
            FROM MTL_CUSTOMER_ITEMS MCI,
                 MTL_CUSTOMER_ITEM_XREFS MCIX,
                 MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B MSIB
           -- MTL_PARAMETERS          MP
           WHERE     MCI.CUSTOMER_ID = C.CUSTOMER_ID                 --1814924
                 AND MCI.CUSTOMER_ITEM_ID = MCIX.CUSTOMER_ITEM_ID
                 AND MCIX.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = MSIB.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
                 AND MSIB.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID   --869899
                 AND MSIB.ORGANIZATION_ID = MTP.ORGANIZATION_ID --MP.ORGANIZATION_ID
                 AND MTP.ORGANIZATION_CODE = 'BRM'
                 AND MCI.CUSTOMER_ITEM_NUMBER = B.ORDERED_ITEM
                 AND NVL (mci.inactive_flag, 'N') <> 'Y'
                 AND NVL (mcix.inactive_flag, 'N') <> 'Y')
            CUSTOMER_ITEM,
                 XXAB_ITEM_XREFS.GET_GBC_ITEM_NUM (B.ORDERED_ITEM) GBC_ITEM_NUMBER,
         B.ORDERED_QUANTITY,
         B.PRICE_LIST,
         B.UNIT_SELLING_PRICE,
         B.UNIT_LIST_PRICE,
               TO_NUMBER (B.ATTRIBUTE7) CUST_SENT_PRICE,
         apps.XXAB_CUST_SENT_PRICE_CONV_SO (C.customer_number,
                                            B.ordered_item,
                                            B.header_id,
                                            B.line_number,
                                            B.unit_selling_price,
                                            B.attribute7,
                                            B.pricing_quantity_uom,
                                            B.attribute4)
            CUST_SENT_PRICE_CONVERTED,
         ABS ( (B.UNIT_SELLING_PRICE
                - apps.XXAB_CUST_SENT_PRICE_CONV_SO (C.customer_number,
                                                     B.ordered_item,
                                                     B.header_id,
                                                     B.line_number,
                                                     B.unit_selling_price,
                                                     B.attribute7,
                                                     B.pricing_quantity_uom,
                                                     B.attribute4)))
            DIFFERENCE,
                  MTP.ORGANIZATION_CODE,
         B.SHIP_TO_LOCATION
    FROM OE_ORDER_HEADERS_V A,
         OE_ORDER_LINES_V B,
         RA_CUSTOMERS C,
         MTL_PARAMETERS MTP,
         MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B MSI
   WHERE     A.HEADER_ID = B.HEADER_ID
         AND A.SOLD_TO_ORG_ID = C.CUSTOMER_ID
         -- Added by Gati on 19-Oct-2012, tkt - INC000000118962
         AND ROUND (TO_NUMBER (apps.XXAB_CUST_SENT_PRICE_CONV_SO (
                                  C.customer_number,
                                  B.ordered_item,
                                  B.header_id,
                                  B.line_number,
                                  B.unit_selling_price,
                                  B.attribute7,
                                  B.pricing_quantity_uom,
                                  B.attribute4)),
                    2) <> B.UNIT_SELLING_PRICE
         --AND ROUND(TO_NUMBER(B.ATTRIBUTE7), 2) <> B.UNIT_SELLING_PRICE
         --AND     a.ship_from_org_id = mtp.organization_id
         AND B.SHIP_FROM_ORG_ID = MTP.ORGANIZATION_ID          -- GRW 20060413
         --AND     a.ship_from_org_id = msi.organization_id
         AND B.SHIP_FROM_ORG_ID = MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID          -- GRW 20060413
         AND B.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID       -- GRW 20060407
         AND A.ORDER_SOURCE_ID = 6
         AND A.ORG_ID = B.ORG_ID
         AND TO_CHAR (A.ordered_date, 'DD-MON-YYYY') between '01-NOV-2013' and '03-NOV-2013'
         and mtP.organization_code='BRM'
                  AND A.ORG_ID = (SELECT HOU.ORGANIZATION_ID
                           FROM HR_OPERATING_UNITS HOU
                          WHERE HOU.NAME = '50 ACCO Canada')
         AND B.cancelled_flag <> 'Y'
         AND B.flow_status_code <> 'CANCELLED'
         AND B.ORDERED_ITEM <> 'INVALID_ITEM'
ORDER BY a.order_number

Hi,
Assuming your initialization matches your discoverer login, it is pretty weird that you get no data.
I am not sure how you got the SQL but i suggest you trace the session to get the exact SQL ran by the discoverer.
You may find another condition or join that limits your data.
Also another thing that you should try is to initial the session by using all the parameters (including the security group as you have in your discoverer login):
begin
fnd_global.APPS_INITIALIZE(user_id =>, resp_id =>, resp_appl_id =>, security_group_id =>);
end

Discoverer report with PO_RELEASES in R12

Hi all,
I'm migrating a Discoverer report from 11i to R12. The query of the folder uses the po_releases and this join condition "and rcv_transactions.po_release_id = po_releases.po_release_id(+)". When I run the report I get the error "invalid number" but when I tried the same query but using the po_releases_all it seems to work. Is this ok? I saw that in R12 po_releases is just a synonym, is this correct? I would appreciate your comments.
Thanks in advance.
Gabriela

Thanks Hussein. Yes, I've checked the document you recomend, but the problem seems to be when I try to use po_releases, the synomy) and I don't know why it work with the _all table but not work with the synonym.

Discoverer Report showing Null VS Show SQL query showing results !!!

I created a simple Cross Tab Discoverer report from a custom SQL which has a calculation for balances. The output is giving all null values even though there are balances. The output doesn't seem right. So I copied the query from Tools-->Show SQL and ran the query in the TOAD where I'm showing balances for the report. I don't understand why it is not showing in the discoverer. Please help.
Thanks
Edited by: PA1B on Jan 27, 2010 11:40 AM

Sorry for late reply.
Below is the Show SQL query. I don't think the query is application dependent. C_1 is my calculation.
SELECT o279709.SEGMENT3 as E279727,
o279709.SEGMENT4 as E279728,
CASE WHEN o279709.CURRENCY_CODE = 'USD' AND o279709.TRANSLATED_FLAG <> 'Y' THEN SUM(o279709.ENDING_BAL) ELSE 0 END as C_1,
GROUPING_ID(o279709.CURRENCY_CODE,o279709.SEGMENT3,o279709.SEGMENT4,o279709.TRANSLATED_FLAG) as GID
FROM ( --Foriegn Entity USD Balances
SELECT                B.SEGMENT1,
                                   B.SEGMENT2,
                                   B.SEGMENT3,
                              (select distinct substr(cat.COMPILED_VALUE_ATTRIBUTES,5,1) from apps.fnd_flex_values cat
               where FLEX_VALUE_SET_ID = (select bat.FLEX_VALUE_SET_ID from apps.fnd_id_flex_structures_vl aat, apps.fnd_id_flex_segments_vl bat
                                                                                                                   where bat.id_flex_code = 'GL#' and
                                                                                                                        bat.id_flex_code = aat.id_flex_code and
                                                                                                                        aat.APPLICATION_ID = bat.APPLICATION_ID and
                                                                                                                        aat.APPLICATION_ID = 101 and
                                                                                                                        bat.SEGMENT_NAME = 'Prime Account' and
                                                                                                                        aat.id_flex_num = bat.id_flex_num
                                                                                                                        and bat.id_flex_num in (select distinct chart_of_accounts_id from apps.gl_code_combinations gat
                                                                                                                                                                          where gat.code_combination_id = A.code_combination_id))
                                   and cat.flex_value = b.segment3) ACCT_TYPE ,
                                   B.SEGMENT4,
                                   B.SEGMENT5,
                                   B.SEGMENT6,
                                   B.SEGMENT7,
                                   B.SEGMENT8,
                                   B.SEGMENT9,
                                   B.SEGMENT10,
                                   B.SEGMENT11,
                                   B.SEGMENT12,
                                   B.SEGMENT13,
                                   C.NAME,
A.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID,
                                   A.CURRENCY_CODE,A.TRANSLATED_FLAG,
                              SUM(NVL(A.BEGIN_BALANCE_DR,0) - NVL(A.BEGIN_BALANCE_CR,0)) BEG_BAL,
                              SUM(NVL(A.PERIOD_NET_DR,0)) DEBITS,
SUM( NVL(A.PERIOD_NET_CR,0)) CREDITS ,
A.PERIOD_NAME,
                              SUM(NVL(A.BEGIN_BALANCE_DR,0) - NVL(A.BEGIN_BALANCE_CR,0))+ SUM(NVL(A.PERIOD_NET_DR,0) - NVL(A.PERIOD_NET_CR,0)) ENDING_BAL
FROM                     APPS.GL_BALANCES A ,
                                   APPS.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS B,
                                   APPS.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS     C
WHERE                     A.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = B.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
--AND                           A.PERIOD_NAME = 'SEP-09'
AND                          C.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID = A.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID
--AND                           A.TRANSLATED_FLAG <> 'Y'
--AND                           B.SEGMENT1 = '83101'
--AND                           B.SEGMENT3 = '14602'
--AND                           A.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID = 77
--AND                           A.CURRENCY_CODE = 'USD'
GROUP BY           A.CODE_COMBINATION_ID,
                              B.SEGMENT1,
                                   B.SEGMENT2,
                                   B.SEGMENT3,
                                   B.SEGMENT4,
                                   B.SEGMENT5,
                                   B.SEGMENT6,
                                   B.SEGMENT7,
                                   B.SEGMENT8,
                                   B.SEGMENT9,
                                   B.SEGMENT10,
                                   B.SEGMENT11,
                                   B.SEGMENT12,
                                   B.SEGMENT13,
                                   A.CURRENCY_CODE,
                                   A.TRANSLATED_FLAG,
                                   C.NAME,A.PERIOD_NAME,
A.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID
) o279709
WHERE (o279709.PERIOD_NAME = 'DEC-09')
AND (o279709.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID <> 72)
AND (o279709.SEGMENT12 = '000')
AND (o279709.SEGMENT3 IN ('10101','10301','10502','12001'))
AND (o279709.SEGMENT1 IN ('82901','82902','82903','83001','83003','83201'))
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS(( o279709.CURRENCY_CODE,o279709.SEGMENT3,o279709.SEGMENT4,o279709.TRANSLATED_FLAG ),( o279709.SEGMENT3,o279709.SEGMENT4 ),( o279709.SEGMENT3 ))
HAVING (GROUP_ID()=0)
ORDER BY GID DESC;
Thanks,
PA1
Edited by: PA1B on Jan 29, 2010 12:50 PM

Discoverer report does not sum up the column

Hi All,
I am running the discoverer report from discoverer desktop and was
trying to use the sum function to sum the total amount of the report.
The sum function does not work and it only display Cell
Sum: (blank) with no actual data.
When i checked the report details some columns are calculated based on the columns which i want to sum up.
Any ideas please share with me
Thanks in advance.

b) What is the difference between sum and cell sum? Well, I certainly won't claim to be a Discoverer guru. From what little I have seen, the practical result is not any difference really between the two. SUM of a calculated row is adding up the calculation to the total. Whereas cell sum is like adding up the individual values behind the calculation you see. The distinction makes more sense when you have SUM DISTINCT and CELL SUM DISTINCT being involved. Then you will see a difference in the calculated total. But for SUM and CELL SUM itself, I have not seen any difference between the two, but I am still pretty new to Discoverer.
e) Aggregate field from a folder. Well, this may be one where you have to play around with your own data to understand. Let me try to give you a simple example. Let's say you have a sales table with 100 rows. You have sales data for 5 cities, and each city has 20 rows of sales history. If you pick Sales Dollars Detail and City Name for your workbook and run, you will get 100 rows in your result (complete detail listing). So that is what happens with no aggregation. Now, instead of doing Sales Dollars Detail, you pick Sales Dollars Sum (the same thing as saying SUM(Sales Dollars) in an SQL statement). Run the workbook. You will now get 5 rows of data, instead of 100 rows of data. You will get one row for each city. If you look at the SQL that Discoverer generates, you will see that it has now done a GROUP BY in the SQL statement. Notice I have not said anything about DISTINCT (just trying to keep things simple).
Now, lets say you do a workbook for City, Part Number, and Sales Dollars Sum. Run the workbook. You get a summarized result (say maybe 10 rows of summary data this time). If you look at the Discoverer SQL, the GROUP BY is now by city and part number, automatically doing that because you picked the SUM version of sales dollars.
Now lets say you add Sales Units Detail to the workbook. Discoverer will give you a warning message that you are have both an aggregate and a non-aggregate and that you may end up with unpredictable results. Run the workbook. You will be back to 100 rows, because you specified sales units in detail.
Most of the time I do not want to see detail rows in a workbook. So most of the time I am picking the SUM aggregate for an amount item.
Hope this explains things a bit. Sounds like maybe you need to take the Discoverer Create Queries and Reports class. Would help you understand these things better. Good luck.
John Dickey

Discoverer Report Names

Discoverer Report Naming
Our service Provider has created lot many reports for us and now theres a need for a generic naming to be followed for the Discoverer reports. Could someone tell me how difficult it would be to rename all the reports?
As I could see, theres a dataitem for the Discoverer Report names, I would imagine the report names are somewhere stored in the database as values in a DB table. So if the name of the report is stored in the database in a table , then it is simpler enough to change the value of the column. It would be more of a find and replace command in SQL.But I'm not sure whether this would have an impact on the actual Report name! for our service provider is telling us that they need to open every report in Discovere to rename and store it. Then they need to delete the other report- which I doubt as I'm not sure !
Also I would like to know where and how the names of the Discoverer Reports are saved in the database?
Kindly advice.Many thanks

Hi,
You can inform to your SP to edit the table EUL4_documents
and ask him to modify the name of the report that is stored in the column DOC_NAME .There is absolutely no necessary to open the work book that is stored in the database and change the work book name
Regards
Swamy!

Discoverer report taking too long time to open.

HI,
Discovere reports are taking too long time to open. Please help to resolve this.
Regards,
Bhatia

What is the Dicoverer and the Application release?
Please refer to the following links (For both Discoverer 4i and 10g). Please note that some Discoverer 4i notes also apply to Discoverer 10g.
Note: 362851.1 - Guidelines to setup the JVM in Apps Ebusiness Suite 11i and R12
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=362851.1
Note: 68100.1 - Discoverer Performance When Running On Oracle Applications
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=68100.1
Note: 465234.1 - Recommended Client Java Plug-in (JVM/JRE) For Discoverer Plus 10g (10.1.2)
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=465234.1
Note: 329674.1 - Slow Performance When Opening Plus Workbooks from Oracle 11.5.10 Applications Home Page
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=329674.1
Note: 190326.1 - Ideas for Improving Discoverer 4i Performance in an Applications 11i Environment
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=190326.1
Note: 331435.1 - Slow Perfomance Using Disco 4.1 Admin/Desktop in Oracle Applications Mode EUL
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=331435.1
Note: 217669.1 - Refreshing Folders and opening workbooks is slow in Apps 11i environment
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=217669.1

Discoverer report is taking much time to open

Hi
All the discoverer report are taking much time to open,even query in lov is taking 20 -25 min.s.We have restart the services but on result found.
Please suggest what can be done ,my application is on 12.0.6.
Regards

This topic was discussed many times in the forum before, please see old threads for details and for the docs you need to refer to -- https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Discoverer+AND+Slow&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Thanks,
Hussein

Discoverer report returns no data from a certain time

Using Discoverer 10g,a discoverer report which returned data normally last month gets to return no data now.
We have four same environments, and two of them has this problem, two is OK.
And the SQL of the discoverer of the four environments are the same.
We have no any changment of this discoverer and related EUL for more than one year....
How should we investigate into this issue.
For example ,a point we should notice or something...
Could somebody give us a suggestion?
Thank you.

Thanks for your qiuck reply.
1.empty table that is joined in the query.The four environments has almost the same data,it is not the cause.
2.security issue with the data, maybe the security definitions are different from one environment to another.we are now invesgate into this cause.
and there is a sql of the discoverer's EUL which shows no data in a enviroment(in this enviroment discoverer report gets no data), but in another enviroment data can show.
the sql is as following.
=============
SELECT loc_bu.org_id
,loc_bu.location_id building_id
,loc_bu.building building_name
,loc_bu.location_code building_number
,loc_fl.location_id floor_id
,loc_fl.location_code floor_number
,loc_fl.floor floor_name
,loc_of.location_id office_id
,loc_of.location_code office_number
,loc_of.office office_name
,loc_of.suite office_suite
,loc_of.location_alias office_alias
,loc_of.assignable_area office_assignable_area
,loc_of.space_type_lookup_code office_space_type_code
,lst.meaning office_space_type
,loc_of.function_type_lookup_code office_function_type_code
,fun.meaning office_function_type
,(SELECT ffv.description
FROM fnd_flex_values_vl ffv
,fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs
WHERE ffv.flex_value = loc_of.attribute1
AND ffv.flex_value_set_id = ffvs.flex_value_set_id
AND ffvs.flex_value_set_name = 'MB_PN_ON') occupancy_exception_flag
,loc_of.active_start_date
,loc_of.active_end_date
--ADD BY KEVIN 2008/6/26 START
,loc_of.attribute7 division_code_office
,(SELECT ffv.description
FROM fnd_flex_values_vl ffv
,fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs
WHERE ffv.flex_value = loc_of.attribute7
AND ffv.flex_value_set_id = ffvs.flex_value_set_id
AND ffvs.flex_value_set_name = 'MB_PN_DIVISION') division_description_office --ﾇﾖ-ﾎ・ﾋｵﾃ・
--ADD BY KEVIN 2008/6/26 END
FROM pn_locations loc_bu
,pn_locations loc_fl
,pn_locations loc_of
,fnd_lookups fun
,fnd_lookups lst
WHERE loc_bu.location_id = loc_fl.parent_location_id
AND loc_bu.location_type_lookup_code IN ('LAND', 'BUILDING')
AND nvl(loc_bu.attribute6, '99') <> '01'
AND loc_fl.location_id = loc_of.parent_location_id
AND loc_fl.location_type_lookup_code IN ('FLOOR', 'PARCEL')
AND nvl(loc_fl.attribute6, '99') <> '01'
AND loc_of.location_type_lookup_code IN ('OFFICE', 'SECTION')
AND nvl(loc_of.attribute6, '99') <> '01'
AND loc_of.function_type_lookup_code = fun.lookup_code(+)
AND fun.lookup_type(+) = 'PN_FUNCTION_TYPE'
AND loc_of.space_type_lookup_code = lst.lookup_code(+)
AND lst.lookup_type(+) = decode(loc_of.location_type_lookup_code,
'OFFICE',
'PN_SPACE_TYPE',
'SECTION',
'PN_PARCEL_TYPE')
AND nvl(loc_of.space_type_lookup_code,'99') <> '07';
====================
Ps.before excute this sql, we always first excute following command.
====
begin
fnd_client_info.set_org_context(117);
end;
====
The analyst of our team is not very good at the security problem, could you help us?
Thanks a lot.

Discoverer report - Output from Discoverer plus is not the same as Discoverer desktop

As a part of Upgrade project we are migrating the discoverer reports from 11i (11.5.10.2) to R12 (12.1.3) .After migrating to R12, for a custom discoverer report the output given by discoverer desktop is correct (24 rows for a scenario). But the report output from Discoverer plus does not show the credit transactions (2 rows). The output from Discoverer plus shows only 22 rows (24 - 2), which is incorrect. The query is the same in Discoverer desktop and Discoverer plus.
Please let me know why these transactions that are appearing when the report is run from discoverer desktop are not appearing in discoverer plus. Is there any setup in discoverer plus for this?
Regards,
Brajesh

Pretty hard to answer a question like this. Best bet would be to copy the existing discoverer plus book and start removing conditions, fields, etc until those two rows from desktop show up and see if you can work it out.

Discoverer Report opened from Portal does not show correct data

Hi,
When I try to open a Discoverer report from a portal that I created, it shows stale data but when I click on "Analyze", it shows all the data correctly.
Does anyone know what the reason could be for this?
Thank you,
Santoshi

I assume you used the Discoverer Portlet Provider. A discoverer portlet is never live data. When you define the portlet you specify how often to 'refresh' the data. If you skipped this step, then you just get the data as-of when you created the portlet.
Generally you specify the refresh time to be sometime after your usual database load completes.

Discoverer Report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for