Disk I/O Error after upgrade

Hello, I am running NW2004s SP10 on a Windows XP 32 bit system w/ MAXDB ver 7.6.
I tried to apply an upgrade to SP 13 and now my database will not start nor can I connect. I get the following in the DB trace:
2007-12-20 11:23:45      0x968        31 SrvTask  Permanently reserved 13 servertasks for 'Backup / Restore'.
2007-12-20 11:23:45      0xC68        67 RTEKERN  Kernel state changed from STARTING to ADMIN
2007-12-20 11:23:45      0x968        31 SrvTask  Permanently reserved 2 servertasks for 'Backup / Restore'.
2007-12-20 11:23:45      0xC68     19601 MsgOutp  SERVERDB is ready
2007-12-20 11:23:45      0xC68       221     RTE  Database tries automatic restart
2007-12-20 11:23:45      0x9C0     19821 MsgOutp  Thread 2496 starting
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xD90     19633 MsgOutp  Connect req. (T53, Node:'', PID:2200)
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xD90     19615 MsgOutp  Attaching volume 'C:\sapdb\D01\sapdata\DISKD0001'
2007-12-20 11:23:46     0x17D4 ERR 18177 MsgOutp  No volume on compressed file 'C:\sapdb\D01\sapdata\DISKD0001'
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xD90 ERR    23   IOMan  Attach error on Data volume 1: no volumes on compressed file
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xD90 ERR    14   Admin  RestartFilesystem failed with 'I/O error'
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xD90        49  Kernel  EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN, Error occured: -902, 'I/O error' (disk_not_accessible)
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xD90        40   Admin  Kernel state: 'OFFLINE' reached
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xD90     19620 MsgOutp  Shutdown normal requested
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0x324     19684 MsgOutp  Tracewriter termination timeout: 1200 sec
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xEC4         0   Trace  Start flush kernel trace
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xEC4     19617 MsgOutp  Single I/O attach, 'knltrace', UKT:1
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xEC4         1   Trace  Stop flush kernel trace
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0xEC4     19619 MsgOutp  Releasing tracewriter
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0x324     19600 MsgOutp  'Kernel    7.6.00   Build 009-123-105-149'
2007-12-20 11:23:46      0x324     19654 MsgOutp  SERVERDB 'D01' has stopped
It looks like a disk error, but I am not sure. I was having no issues prior to upgrade. Could it be the upgrade corrupted the DB or could I actually have a bad disk?

Uncommpressed the data and log files and was able to start the DB. I believe the files got compressed when a disk cleanup was run prior to the upgrade to free up disk space.
Thanks for the help!! Points awarded!!

Similar Messages

  • Time machine fails backing up with a "backup disk not found" error after upgrade to Lion 10.7.2

    Time machine fails backing up with a "backup disk not found" error after upgrade to Lion 10.7.2. I've erased and reformatted the drive; reconnected Time Machine(it saw it) and began a new backup. The backup starts again but fails before completing with backup drive not found error. I used the 10.7.2 combo update. Any help on how to fix this problem would be appreciated.

    Arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!
    After waiting since October for a fix, I have now upgraded the firmware on the Time Capsule and installed the new Airport Utility, released yesterday, and the situation is even worse.
    Up until now, the Airport Utility had an option to disconnect all drives manually and the Time Capsule would then work until the next reboot – a temporary (?) work-around.
    Now that option does not exist in the new-look Airport Utility. And the Airport Utility installation can’t be rolled back and the old utility won’t restore.
    The sparesbundle is still not accessible. Anyone worked out a work-around in the new environment yet?
    I have another Time Machine backup working fine to a trusty old Lacie Drive so erased the one on my Time Capsule to see if that works. I have renamed the Capsule and the Time Capsule Drive.  But to build another full backup will take at least two days and I shall be away from tomorrow and am reluctant to leave the Capsule and computer up and running for a week. And I’ll bet the sparsbundle will still be nowhere to be found.
    How can Apple screw up so badly when they are to become the richest company in the entire world and – soon – will have more cash in the bank than the entire United States? Can’t they afford someone who really can sort this out? Especially when a Firewire connected hard drive – my trusty and simple LaCie – works fine.
    Words, almost, fail me.

  • TS1277 "iPhoto was unable to connect to Photo Stream" error after upgrading to mountain lion

    Has anyone gotten this error after upgrading to mountain lion on a computer that already had a user setup on it?
    My iphoto was working with photostream and now it will not connect at all.
    I ran fix disk permissions and once it showed up in iphoto, photostream was loading and then it disappeared again.
    help!

    FWIW I fixed mine when I realised I'd probably downloaded iPhoto using an AppleID from the App Store but logged into iCloud with a different AppleID. I deleted iPhoto and it's related files (but not the iPhoto Library) using CleanApp, entered the App Store with my usual AppleID and downloaded iPhoto again. Once the App Store, the downloaded iPhoto and iCloud logins were the same iPhoto Stream worked again.

  • Flash 9,0,124,0 security error after upgrade

    I get the following error after upgrading my Flash Player
    (after my system prompted me to install it while running the Flash
    editor):
    Internet Explorer has blocked this site from using an ActiveX
    control in an unsafe manner.
    I have uninstalled and reinstalled the player from the
    browser, about 5 times now and it continues to be a problem for IE.
    Works ok in Firefox if I manually download the FF installer. Is
    there a standalone installer for Vista/IE7 or am I forced to use
    the ActiveX installer which seems to have issues?

    Fix: Removed both (!?more than one?!) versions of flash
    player in my Programs and Features dialog, then ran
    uninstall_flash_player.exe, reset IE7 to factory spec, then
    reinstalled Flash from ActiveX. Seems to be working now.

  • Error after upgrade CRS 4.0.4SR1 to 4.0.5SR2

    Hi,
    I've got some errors after upgrading my CRS 4.0.4SR1 cluster to 4.0.5SR2.
    First my publisher's status stay in "patch" status for near 2 days now. I'm not able to change anything in the configuration, i've got this message "Config Changes are not allowed during 'Patch' operation, which was started by  '_ccbu_build' at 'Thu Apr 08 04:31:04 CEST 2010 '. Please try again after  'Patch' is complete."(ERREUR02.jpg). How can I change this status?
    Then I've got errors in historical DB which is working but not on the publisher only on subscriber. How can I resynchronize this DB?
    Thanks for your help.

    Thanks Tammy for the reply
    We already tried the suggested SAP Note couple of time without any luck.
    Regards,
    SJ

  • Error after upgrading from  sap b1 pl 35 to pl 49

    hello sap experts 
    iam getting the following error after upgrading from  sap b1 pl 35 to pl 49 this error is coming if we have given round off or discount in the below cell
    "Discount deviates from authorised ranges (sales oreder-discount%for document) [message 439-15] pls make it as soon as possible an i will be thankful to those guys .
    regards
    Jenny

    Hello Jenny,
    You may check by supreuser account first to see if you got the same error.  If not, it probably just related to user authorization.  If yes, it must be a bug.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • What can I do if I get an internal power error after upgrading to Windows 10?

    QuestionWhat can I do if I get an internal power error after upgrading to Windows 10?
    AnswerSome laptops with AMD graphics that upgraded to Windows 10 are showing blue screens with error messages regarding Internal_Power_Error. If you receive this error, try the procedure in this article.
    First, you'll need to quickly set the boot options to Safe Mode:
    1. Hold the Windows key and press 'R' to open the run box.
    2. Type MSCONFIG, then press ENTER.
    3. Select the BOOT tab.
    4. Under BOOT OPTIONS, check Safe boot, then select Minimal.
    5. Click Apply, then OK.
    6. Click Restart. (If prompted, click Restart anyway.)
    From Safe Mode disable the AMD Display Driver:
    1. Hold the Windows key and press the 'X' key to open a menu in the lower-left.
    2. Click Device Manager.
    3. Expand Display adapters to show the two display adapters.
    4. Double click AMD Radeon R9 M200X Series.
    5. Select the Driver tab.
    6. Click Disable, then click Yes to confirm.
    7. Click Close.
    8. Hold the Windows key and press the 'R' key to open the run box.
    9. Type MSCONFIG, then press ENTER.
    10. Select the BOOT tab.
    11. Uncheck Safe boot.
    12. Click Apply, then OK.
    13. Click Restart. (If prompted, click Restart anyway.)
    From Windows 10 started with the AMD Display Driver disabled:
    1. Hold the Windows key and press the 'X' key to open a menu in the lower-left.
    2. Click Device Manager.
    3. Expand Display adapters to show the two display adapters.
    4. Double click AMD Radeon R9 M200X Series.
    5. Select the Driver tab.
    6. Click Update Driver.
    7. Click Search automatically for updated driver software.
    8. An AMD driver should be found and installed.
    The driver that originally caused this problem is AMD display driver version 15.200.1046.2 dated 7/15/2015.
    The driver installed through this process might have an older date, such as 15.200.1055.0 dated 7/6/2015. That's okay.

    I'm having the same problem.  I got error message 21.  I went to apple store.  they are saying i have a hardware error.  Really, my phone was working before the update.  Asked me for $150 to get another one when I am due to get a new one and wanted to pass this one on to my child. 
    Help please,
    I will be glad to go back to the older software update

  • Imac error after upgrade to 10.8.4

    I received an error after upgrade tp brand new imac.  Error was upgrade was not installed.  Upon reboot the version of SW in About thi Mac is 10.8.4.  Bug?
    iMac i7, 21.5" 16GB memory, fusion drive.
    Thanks for input.  I assume the upgrade took.

    Verify Permissions gave me some errors, I deleted the repeats and the permissions fixed lines:
    Repairing permissions for “Macintosh HD”
    Warning: SUID file “System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Admin.framework/Versions/A/Resources/readconf ig” has been modified and will not be repaired.
    Warning: SUID file “usr/lib/sa/sadc” has been modified and will not be repaired.
    Warning: SUID file “usr/bin/quota” has been modified and will not be repaired.
    +++ (multiple repairs)
    Permissions repair complete
    I verfied the HD
    Much text (removed)...
    The volume Macintosh HD appears to be OK.
    I also loaded the Apple downloads version of the upgarde and received the following (again):
    The Installation failed
    The insatllation encountered an error that caused the installation to fail. Contact the software manufacturer for assistance.
    Message was edited by: Steve51K

  • External disk space gone crazy after upgrade to SL

    Hi,
    I have just upgraded from Leopard to Snow Leopard, and am now running 10.6.3. I have an iomega 320GB external USB hard disk which I use to back up via Time Machine, and also to periodically back up a virtual machine which is not backed up by Time Machine. Prior to upgrading, there was about 3GB of space on the iomega drive, the TM backups were taking about 251GB and my virtual machine backup was taking the remaining 66GB.
    The first time I connected the iomega drive after upgrading to SL, I wanted to deleted the backup copy of the virtual machine (66GB), so I navigated to it in the Finder, right-clicked on the folder and selected "Move to trash", whereupon it duly disappeared. (I thought it slightly odd that I didn't hear the drive making any sound – I thought I should be able to hear it pysically deleting the file.) I then tried to copy a new virtual machine file of smaller size onto the iomega drive, and got an error message that there was not enough disk space. I selected the drive in the L/H pane of the Finder window and hit Cmd-I to get info: this told me the following:
    Capacity 319.73GB
    Available 1.89GB
    Used 317.84GB
    I know that the files I just deleted from the iomega were around 66GB, so why isn't there at least 66GB of free space? I have not run Time Machine since upgrading, so there is no way the TM backup set can have somehow expanded to fill up the additional space. I have run Disk Utility and tried repairing the drive, but this has made no difference. I then selected the Time Machine backup set on the iomega drive, which is a folder named "Backups.backupdb", and hit Cmd-I to get info. The get info window popped up and said it was calculating the size of the item. Some six-and-a-half hours later, it finally concluded its calculations and told me that the backup set is... wait for it... 4.54TB! (4,458,364,261,372B to be precise...)
    What is going on? I'm aware that SL uses a different basis to measure disk space, but this does not explain where 66GB of freed up space has suddenly "disappeared" to, or why this backup set appears to be 14 times the physical size of the disk it's on!
    Am I going to have to erase the drive and lose all my previous TM backups, or is there some other way around this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Rob

    After you selected move to Trash, did you remember to then empty the Trash? When you move something to the Trash the Finder puts it in the invisible Trash folder of the drive in question, and there it stays until the Trash is emptied with the drive mounted.
    I have many crackpop theories about things, and one of them is that Apple has somehow messed up the Finder's ability to calculate sizes in the newly rewritten Snow Leopard Finder. Mind you, Finder has not been very good at doing this for a very long time anyway, but it seems to me it has gotten even worse. Nonetheless it should be able to get an answer that makes sense using the GetInfo function for a drive, although it will take longer than it seems to me it ought to do (but in the range of minutes rather than hours). Thus GetInfo on my Time drive shows
    Capacity 249.93GB
    Available 140.95GB
    Used 108.97GB
    A result returned remarkably quickly (for a change). Using the disk usuage command in Terminal, where the results returned are shown in the "old" size format rather than the new PR influenced format, shows this:
    NoobiX:~ francine$ sudo du -cxhd 1 /Volumes/Time
    Password:
    1.4M /Volumes/Time/.fseventsd
    1.5G /Volumes/Time/.Spotlight-V100
    0B /Volumes/Time/.TemporaryItems
    0B /Volumes/Time/.Trashes
    0B /Volumes/Time/.vol
    5.4G /Volumes/Time/Applications
    77G /Volumes/Time/Backups.backupdb
    7.6M /Volumes/Time/bin
    0B /Volumes/Time/cores
    0B /Volumes/Time/dev
    0B /Volumes/Time/home
    7.0G /Volumes/Time/Library
    0B /Volumes/Time/net
    0B /Volumes/Time/Network
    510M /Volumes/Time/private
    5.2M /Volumes/Time/sbin
    3.8G /Volumes/Time/System
    3.8G /Volumes/Time/Users
    1.0G /Volumes/Time/usr
    4.0K /Volumes/Time/Volumes
    100G /Volumes/Time
    100G total
    Terminal takes a bit of time to return the above results, but again it is in the range of some minutes, not hours. If you DID remember to empty the Trash after moving the files to it, you might try running the du command in Terminal to see where the stuff is.
    Copy and paste this into Terminal
    sudo du -cxhd 1
    press the spacebar, then drag and drop the mounted volume into the Terminal from the Desktop. Press return, enter your admin password (which is not echoed to the screen in any way whatsoever), press return again, and go have a cup of coffee while the sizes are calculated.
    Finally, the repair disk function in Disk Utility is not particularly robust. To truly repair a disk with siginificant problems you need something like Disk Warrior.
    Francine
    Francine
    Schwieder

  • Connectivity Error After Upgrading to Yosemite

    When trying to scan using HP Utility after upgrading to Mac OS Yosemite, I receive the following error:
    An error occurred while communicating with the HP imaging device.  Try the following steps.  After each step, try scanning again.
    - Turn off and then unplug the device, wait 60 seconds, and plug in and turn on the device.
    - Make sure that the device’s power cord and cable are properly attached, plugged in, and the device is on.
    - Reboot the computer.  Uninstall and reinstall the device.
    - Reinstall the HP Scan software that came with the device.
    - If you continue to receive this error, you may need to request service for your device.
    My computer seems to recognize the device on my wireless network but cannot connect to it.  I have tried reinstalling the printer and cycling everything (computer, printer, wireless router) off and on, to no avail.  I just upgraded the driver software through Software Update this week.
    Any suggestions?

    Hi MASTERNC, and thanks for getting back to me!
    I would suggest deleting the printer from your print system, using this document: Uninstalling the Printer Software.
    Once you have deleted it, I would suggest verifying and repairing the disk permissions: About Disk Utility's Repair Disk Permissions feature.
    I would then suggest readding the printer to your system by running your Apple updates:  OS X: Updating OS X and Mac App Store apps
    Good luck and please let me know how it goes!
    Please click “Accept as Solution " if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks" for helping!
    Jamieson
    I work on behalf of HP
    "Remember, I'm pulling for you, we're all in this together!" - Red Green.

  • Login Error after Upgrading from BW 3.5 to BI 7.0

    Hi Experts,
    We have carried out an upgrade from BW 3.5 to BI 7.0.
    After Upgrade we are not able to login using SAP GUI. we are getting an error saying..
    Username or Password not Valid..
    During the upgrade (in Netweaver 2004s ) is there procedure necessary to be followed, which we could have missed..
    Your response will be greatly appreciated.
    Regards
    LRaghunahth

    Hi
    Thanks a lot for your reponse.
    Basically I am able to login thru sap* / ddic and can unlock the users / reset the password.
    But the customer wants to know why the user is getting locked and it happened because of any procedure miss whil performing the upgrade..
    if it is usual that users get locked during upgrade, any SAP Notes to refer..
    Thanks a lot for helping in this community.
    Best Regards
    L Raghunahth

  • Facing Parse Errors after upgrading database from 10g to 11g

    Hi,
    We are facing parse errors in the SQL's after upgrading database from 10g to 11g.
    Kindly look into below parse errors.
    ********************************** Parse Error *****************************************************
    Tue Aug 13 14:13:08 2013
    kksSetBindType 16173533-2: parse err=1446 hd=3c73061fb8 flg=100476 cisid=173 sid=173 ciuid=173 uid=173
    PARSE ERROR: ospid=15598, error=1446 for statement:
    SELECT ROWID,ORGANIZATION_CODE,PADDED_CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS,PRIMARY_UOM_CODE,REVISION,SUBINVENTORY_CODE,TOTAL_QOH,NET,RSV,ATP,ORGANIZATION_NAME,ITEM_DESCRIPTION,INVENTORY_ITEM_ID,ORGANIZATION_ID,LOCATOR_ID,LOCATOR_TYPE,ITEM_LOCATOR_CONTROL,ITEM_LOT_CONTROL,ITEM_SERIAL_CONTROL FROM MTL_ONHAND_LOCATOR_V WHERE (INVENTORY_ITEM_ID=:1) and (ORGANIZATION_ID=:2) order by ORGANIZATION_CODE,SUBINVENTORY_CODE,REVISION, organization_code, padded_concatenated_segments
    Tue Aug 13 14:13:10 2013
    kksfbc 16173533: parse err=942 hd=3c387c4028 flg=20 cisid=3266 sid=3266 ciuid=3266 uid=3266
    PARSE ERROR: ospid=29813, error=942 for statement:
    Select feature from toad.toad_restrictions where user_name=USER or user_name in ( select ROLE from sys.session_roles)
    kksfbc 16173533: parse err=942 hd=3c97d83648 flg=20 cisid=3266 sid=3266 ciuid=3266 uid=3266
    PARSE ERROR: ospid=29813, error=942 for statement:
    SELECT password
    FROM SYS.USER$
    WHERE  0=1
    kksfbc 16173533: parse err=6550 hd=35185e4278 flg=20 cisid=3266 sid=3266 ciuid=3266 uid=3266
    ----- PL/SQL Stack -----
    ----- PL/SQL Call Stack -----
      object      line  object
      handle    number  name
    319e277050        30  anonymous block
    319e277050        57  anonymous block
    PARSE ERROR: ospid=29813, error=6550 for statement:
    BEGIN sys.dbms_profiler."146775420110782746251362632012"; END;
    kksfbc 16173533: parse err=942 hd=3c142d8600 flg=20 cisid=3266 sid=3266 ciuid=3266 uid=3266
    ----- PL/SQL Stack -----
    ----- PL/SQL Call Stack -----
      object      line  object
      handle    number  name
    319e277050        67  anonymous block
    PARSE ERROR: ospid=29813, error=942 for statement:
    SELECT 1 FROM plsql_profiler_data WHERE 0 = 1
    Please help.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi Suresh,
    Apologies for misunderstanding..
    Tue Aug 13 14:13:08 2013
    kksSetBindType 16173533-2: parse err=1446 hd=3c73061fb8 flg=100476 cisid=173 sid=173 ciuid=173 uid=173
    PARSE ERROR: ospid=15598, error=1446 for statement:
    SELECT ROWID,ORGANIZATION_CODE,PADDED_CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS,PRIMARY_UOM_CODE,REVISION,SUBINVENTORY_CODE,TOTAL_QOH,NET,RSV,ATP,ORGANIZATION_NAME,ITEM_DESCRIPTION,INVENTORY_ITEM_ID,ORGANIZATION_ID,LOCATOR_ID,LOCATOR_TYPE,ITEM_LOCATOR_CONTROL,ITEM_LOT_CONTROL,ITEM_SERIAL_CONTROL FROM MTL_ONHAND_LOCATOR_V WHERE (INVENTORY_ITEM_ID=:1) and (ORGANIZATION_ID=:2) order by ORGANIZATION_CODE,SUBINVENTORY_CODE,REVISION, organization_code, padded_concatenated_segments
    Assuming you see the above error message in the alert log file, which was your original post, follow the below steps:
    1 Get the 'ospid' value from the error
    2. Issue the below command:
    SQL> select request_id,ORACLE_PROCESS_ID
      2 from fnd_concurrent_requests
      3 where request_id = 15598;
    3. After obtaining the request_id
    4, Query it from the front-end using SYSADMIN responsibility
    Hopefully this should get you the respective concurrent report/program.
    Thanks &
    Best Regards,

  • "The query was cancelled" error after upgrade from 10.1.3.3.3 to 10.1.3.4.2

    Hi,
    I was using OBIEE 10.1.3.3.3 /. After upgrading to 10.1.3.4.2 , the queries are not running ( long running queries alone) as expected. and so all the campaigns iwh tlong running queries are cancelled and the error message is seen in the xml log in Marketing jobs management.
    We have upgraded the OBIEE version from 10.1.3.3.3 to 10.1.3.4.2 yesterday after which the connectivites have been checked with SQLPLUS and they are working fine. But when the campaign has been loaded, the Analytics have received the request for the segment query and after longer run, the task has been cancelled with the error message "The Query was cancelled as mentioned below in the Job Stats
    <jobStats>
    <jobID>2</jobID>
    <jobType>WriteListFiles</jobType>
    <jobUser>userid</jobUser>
    <jobState>Error</jobState>
    <jobTotalMilliSec>1h 41m 21s 160ms</jobTotalMilliSec>
    <jobStartedTime>2012-03-22T08:06:13Z</jobStartedTime>
    <jobFinishedTime>2012-03-22T09:47:34Z</jobFinishedTime>
    <jobIsCancelling>N</jobIsCancelling>
    - <exception>
    <message>Job request of type "WriteListFiles" failed.</message>
    - <exception>
    <message>Error executing the list generation SQL.</message>
    - <exception>
    <message>Error in executing cursor for WorkNode (Id:0)</message>
    - <exception>
    <message>The query was cancelled.</message>
    </exception>
    </exception>
    </exception>
    </exception>
    </jobStats>
    Please let us know the suggestions
    So far, the unaccessedtimingrunoutminutes tag has been tried to set 50 under ODBC tag in instanceconfig.xml. and the defaulttimeoutminutes has been tried to set to 150 in the same instanceconfig.xml.
    along with that the rpd changes are done. For all the users apart from the Administrator, the timeout has been changedfrom 10 minutes to 150 minutes. But still that way is not working.
    The segments was fired with the Administrator login. So , if the timeout for admin login can be set, i assume that the problem might be solved. Please let us know ur suggestions here too.
    If that is the case, when we open rpd , only for Administrator user and group, the Permissions button is disabled. So i want to know how to change for Admin user settings in rpd..
    Please advice us on the same.
    Regards,
    Madasamy M.
    Edited by: Madasamy Murugaboobathi on Mar 26, 2012 1:40 PM

    The issue has been resolved by setting the following parameters
    <UnaccessedRunningTimeoutMinutes>120</UnaccessedRunningTimeoutMinutes>
    <DefaultTimeoutMinutes>120</DefaultTimeoutMinutes>
    <ClientSessionExpireMinutes>120</ClientSessionExpireMinutes>
    <ConnectionExpireMinutes>120</ConnectionExpireMinutes>
    <UIDefaultTimeoutMinutes>1440</UIDefaultTimeoutMinutes>

  • Build error after upgrading from 8.2.1 to 8.5 "Error 1055 occurred at Invoke Node..."

    After upgrading to 8.5, I'm getting the following error when trying to build an EXE:
    Visit the Request Support page at ni.com/ask to learn more about resolving this problem. Use the following information as a reference:
    Error 1055 occurred at Invoke Node in AB_Source_Library.lvclass:Close_Reference.vi->AB_Build.lvclass:Copy_Files.vi->AB_Application.lvclass:Copy_Files.vi->AB_Build.lvclass:Build.vi->AB_EXE.lvclass:Build.vi->AB_Engine_Build.vi->AB_Build_Invoke.vi->AB_Build_Invoke.vi.ProxyCaller
    Possible reason(s):
    LabVIEW:  Object reference is invalid.
    I have been building this application for both Windows and Mac OS, and I even get the same error when building the .app on an Intel Mac.
    Things that I've already tried:
    * Mass-compiling all my code
    * Created the project from scratch
    * Enabled each panel of the "diagram disable structure" one at a time and compiled again
    Any ideas?

    Hi Travis,
    Ben’s advice if definitely the best place to start. Error 1055 is a very general LabVIEW error for “Object reference is invalid.” The cause is usually a bad install where important LabVIEW function aren’t placed in the right directory or aren’t installed at all.
    Charlie M. CLD

  • SSL Error after upgrading to Windows 8.1

    After upgrade my Windows 8 to Windows 8.1, I got this SSL Error when I tried to go to "https://google.com":
    http://i.stack.imgur.com/2kaXO.png
    ...and this in IE: http://i.stack.imgur.com/7Gxbw.png
    I have did some research and tried to change my system time up to date, reset my modem and use wireshark to see if anybody is tracking my network, but none of them seem to be the problem.
    Anyone can help me? Thanks a lot...
    EDIT: I have checked my browsers and just figure out that every connection from my computer is not able to connect to any SSL connection, for example Yahoo Messenger login. I'm thinking my computer SSL Certificate got serious problem, is
    there anyway to "reset" it?

    Hi,
    For the issue, it can happen for a wide variety of reasons.
    I suggest we try the following methods to narrow down the issue.
    Method 1.
    Clear the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) state:
    In Internet Explorer, click Tools, and then click Internet Options.
    Click the Content tab, and then click Clear SSL state.
    Method 2.
    Press Win+X, and then click Command Prompt(Admin).
    At the command prompt, type sfc /scannow, and then press ENTER.
    Method 3.
    Press Win+R, type regedit in the box, and then press ENTER.
    Locate and then click the following registry subkey:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl
    On the Edit menu, point to New, and then click Key.
    Type FEATURE_ERROR_PAGE_BYPASS_ZONE_CHECK_FOR_HTTPS_KB950067 to name the new registry subkey, and then press ENTER.
    On the Edit menu, point to New, and then click DWORD Value.
    Type iexplore.exe to name the new registry entry, and then press ENTER.
    On the Edit menu, click Modify.
    Type 1, and then click OK.
    Exit Registry Editor.
    If the issue persists, I suggest you reinstall the IE to check the result.
    Hope these could be helpful.
    Regards,
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Maybe you are looking for