Dladm on solaris x86 snv_90 problem

I have been trying to create an aggregrate on a X4500 solaris express x86 snv_90, however I run into this problem
bash-3.2# dladm create-aggr -d e1000g1 -d e1000g2 -d e1000g3 1 -l active
dladm: invalid dev name 'e1000g1'
Has anybody run into this before, previous releases of solaris express I tried this on with no problem.

You question is not about C programming or the C compiler, but about catopen on Solaris. I suggest you try on OpenSolaris forum:
[http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/index.jspa?categoryID=1]

Similar Messages

Solaris 10 x86 installation problem on ProLiant DL380..

I'm trying to put Sol10 b72 on a dual-proc ProLiant DL380 here, with the Compaq 5i array controller.
I have the Solaris 9 drivers from HP; they seem to work just fine for the installation.
The problem comes at the end of the first disc.
Sidebar:
For one thing (and this drove me NUTS until I got lucky and caught it during a reboot), at the end of the install, on the console, it asks for the driver diskettes..again.
The problem is, it doesn't say this ANYWHERE else, only on the console..and if you're doing the installation in the X desktop, you just never know it. It doesn't write this to the xconsole window. I tried installing a good 5-6 times before, instead of hitting the power button out of frustration after the install just hung again, I actually opened up a terminal and typed 'reboot'..and caught the "Please insert the diskette and press Enter" as it killed X. If anyone at Sun is reading this..you may want to fix this, before someone gets very frustrated that their installations never seem to finish...
End Sidebar.
So...I'm doing the console text install (otherwise you'll never see the message to insert the driver diskettes for the Broadcom NIC and the Compaq array), and sure enough, at the end of the install, it asks for the diskette. I pop in the diskette it's specifically asking for (the Compaq array diskette in this instance), and hit enter. It chugs for a second and then says it can't find the driver on the diskette.
Which is incorrect, because if it haden't found it on the diskette during the device configuration assistant phase during bootup, it wouldn't have even been able to install Solaris.
So..what's up? Anyone have any ideas why Solaris finds it one time but can't find it later? Is this a bug or problem in the installation script?
Thanks,
Greg

problem 1 is that it's looking for ../../s0.. Which I
managed to
fake out by creating the dir in the same mount
point.
Problem 2 is that it can't find .tmp_proto, which I
must
concur with. I can't find that on any of the b72 cd
images.
So, the setup_install_server fails.This seems to be the problem when you try to setup an install
server on a Solaris SPARC system for Solaris x86 clients, using
the Solaris 9 or Solaris 10/Express CD media.
There's a Solaris x86 UFS filesystem on slice 0 on the CD media,
and it's supposed to be mounted on the "s0" mount point,
otherwise setup_install_server won't work. On a Solaris x86 box,
vold mounts it automatically for you: /cdrom/cdrom0/s2 is the
mount point for the platform independant ISO9660 part of the CD
media, /cdrom/cdrom0/s0 is the UFS root filesystem.
Problem is that Solaris SPARC:
- does not understand Solaris x86 disk labels
- does not allow mounting x86 UFS filesystems
(and vice versa).
AFAIK, Solaris 9 DVD media does not have this problem. I
guess the same will be true when Solaris 10 DVD media is
available in a few months. On the DVD media there's enough
free space to include an extra copy of the files in the ISO9660
filesystem.

Problem Oracle10G Installation in Solaris-x86

Hai,
I am facing problem when installing Oracle10g on solaris machine.
I created user and group for oracle and also changed some kernel properties.after changing all requirements i am trying to run runInstaller...but it gave exception like this ...
Exception:
Starting Oracle Universal Installation...
Checking Installation requirements...
Checking Operating System version :
must be 5.6,5.7,5.8,5.9 Actual 5.10
failed <<<<
exsting oracle universal installer.log for this session can be found at /tmp/orainstaller/datetime....
I am using ---
Oracle version : Oracle Database 10g Release 1(10.1.0.3) for Solaris x86
Solaris Version : Solaris 5.10
can any one help me out from this problem....
Thanks in advance ....
-Lakesh

Oracle 10G release 1 only support up to Solaris 9.
You probably need to install 10G release 2. The second release of major Oracle version is always more stable anyway.
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/install.102/b15697/pre_install.htm#sthref110

Solaris 9 x86 installation problem on dell 600sc

I am trying to install Solaris x86 on a Dell 600sc machine. But the installation always abort. It can boot from CDROM and perform hardware scaning. It then fails and reboots itself when loading kernel from CDROM. The error message is:
Warning /pci@0,0/pci-ide@f,1/ide@0 (ata0)
timeout: abort request, target=0 lun=0
Any hint would be highly appreciated.
Jon

I am getting same error with Solaris 10.
Does any one installaed Solaris on this machine.
I am using latest BIOS from DELL.

Install error for Oracle 10g on Solaris x86 64-bit. NETCA won't run

Hi All,
I'm installing Oracle 10.2.0.1 on Solaris x86 64-bit. I run the Oracle installer and all runs well until the NETCA portion of the install. It then errors (error file below). When i attempt to run NETCA outside of the installer i'm getting the same error output. I have verified my OS version and that all dependent packages are installed. I'm not sure what is causing this. Any help would be greatly appriciated.
thanks, dave
ERROR FILE:
An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0xFEEF24E8
Function=strchr+0x8
Library=/lib/libc.so.1
Current Java thread:
     at oracle.net.common.NetGetEnv.getDNSDomain(Native Method)
     at oracle.net.ca.ConfigureProfile.setDefaultProfileParams(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.setupConfigObjects(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.<init>(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.NetCA.main(Unknown Source)
Dynamic libraries:
0x8050000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/bin/java
0xfefc0000      /lib/libthread.so.1
0xfefd0000      /lib/libdl.so.1
0xfeed0000      /lib/libc.so.1
0xfea00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
0xfee80000      /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1
0xfee50000      /lib/libsocket.so.1
0xfedc0000      /lib/libnsl.so.1
0xfeda0000      /lib/libm.so.1
0xfeeb0000      /usr/lib/libsched.so.1
0xfe9a0000      /lib/libm.so.2
0xfed50000      /lib/libscf.so.1
0xfe980000      /lib/libdoor.so.1
0xfe960000      /lib/libuutil.so.1
0xfe940000      /lib/libmd5.so.1
0xfe920000      /lib/libmp.so.2
0xfe8e0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libhpi.so
0xfe890000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so
0xfe850000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so
0xfe830000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so
0xf1a00000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xfc780000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/methods_en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xf13c0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
0xf0f90000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_image.so
0xf0f30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/motif21/libmawt.so
0xf0d50000      /usr/dt/lib/libXm.so.4
0xf0cf0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4
0xf0cc0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0
0xf1890000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXtst.so.1
0xf0c30000      /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4
0xf0be0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libdps.so.5
0xf0a90000      /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6
0xf0a70000      /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6
0xf0a30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnjni10.so
0xefe00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1
0xefc60000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnnz10.so
0xf0a10000      /lib/libkstat.so.1
0xefc40000      /lib/libgen.so.1
0xefc20000      /lib/librt.so.1
0xefbf0000      /lib/libaio.so.1
0xefbd0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libldapjclnt10.so
Heap at VM Abort:
Heap
def new generation total 576K, used 343K [0xf1e00000, 0xf1ea0000, 0xf22e0000)
eden space 512K, 55% used [0xf1e00000, 0xf1e467f8, 0xf1e80000)
from space 64K, 96% used [0xf1e80000, 0xf1e8f798, 0xf1e90000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xf1e90000, 0xf1e90000, 0xf1ea0000)
tenured generation total 1408K, used 338K [0xf22e0000, 0xf2440000, 0xf5e00000)
the space 1408K, 24% used [0xf22e0000, 0xf2334ab8, 0xf2334c00, 0xf2440000)
compacting perm gen total 4096K, used 3580K [0xf5e00000, 0xf6200000, 0xf9e00000)
the space 4096K, 87% used [0xf5e00000, 0xf617f170, 0xf617f200, 0xf6200000)
Local Time = Tue Aug 29 13:49:22 2006
Elapsed Time = 225
# The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_05-b04 mixed mode)
#

I have the same problem on Linux Debian 3.0.
My /etc/hosts looks like:
127.0.0.1     localhost.localdomain     localhost
#192.168.100.1     bt.lan.home     bt
#192.168.100.5     jacek.lan.home     jacek
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1     ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
ff02::3 ip6-allhostsPlease help.

How to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center ?

Hello people,
I want to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center platform.
If I'm not wrong, SunMC doesn't run for Solaris x86, server and client only as console with Java.
In speat of it, I try to install Sun Management Center 3.0 Agent for Solaris x86.
It seems to be ok, install packages, but when execute es-setup script, intents to create the following directory:
/opt/SUNWsymon/base/bin/sparc-sun-solaris2.8
I supose that in this directory, SunMC will install sparc binary files
At this point, I can't follow the installation and abort it.
Can anybody give me ideas to install and integrate my solaris x86 server on SunMC ?
Thanks

Hi Hisham,
hishooooo wrote:
Dear Gents,
I have one X86 Solaris Server configured and installed to be Sun Management Center Server.
successfully i could monitor the Sun Solaris Servers after i have installed the SMC agent on them.
my problem is that i could not install the SMC agent on Red Hat Linux. as i could not find an easy document or steps to do so.
could you guide please?If you still have a copy of your SunMC media around, the same ["es-inst"|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2215/command-line-1?l=en&a=view] program you use to install Solaris Agents should work on Linux as well. It autodetects OS type and will install Solaris packages or RPMs as appropriate.
Regards,
[email protected]
http://www.HalcyonInc.com

Help with evaluation for Solaris x86

Hello,
I would like to evaluate Oracle Identity Manager and Access Manager products at the latest version possible -- the host system(s) are Solaris x86 (SunOS .5.10) Unfortunately, I am having a bit of trouble compiling the list of packages/versions to achieve this for this platform. For instance, on the downloads page it appears that OIM is not available for Solaris x86, not even in older versions(?)
Thank you in advance,
Scott

Hi Scott,
I'm pretty sure that x86 Solaris is not yet certified to run the Identity Management suite. I've been involved in an evaluation process and we ran it all on RedHat Enterprise Server Release 4 Update 5, without too many problems.
cheers,
James

Core 2 Duo and solaris x86 11/06 works for me

This is FYI, since I seen (and posted) problems, but I haven't seen the solution posted.
I have successfully gotten solaris x86 11/06 to install and run on my core 2 duo machine. I had tried solaris x86 06/06, but I could only run in 32bit mode until patch 118855-19 was installed. It looks like 118855-33 is the baseline for 11/06.
With 06/06 I had to edit the grub command and add " kernel/unix" to the end of the 2nd line. This would force 32 bit mode rather than 64 bit. If I tried 64 bit, it would enter an endless reboot cycle. Once I installed the patch to 118855-19 I could run solaris 10 06/06 in 64 bit mode without issue.
Again, since solaris 10 11/06 is at 118855-33, it runs on my core2 machine straight from the install.
Hope this helps

On a laptop there is little point with running a 64-bit operating system unless it physically has more than 4gb of ram, or if you are processing datasets exceeding 4GB of ram. Unless you're into assembly or use Solaris for some reason to manipulate media, little is to be gained by using 64-bit versions if anything. The increased pointer, integer, and padding causes more memory to use for the same software, most software on 64-bit operating systems runs in 32-bit mode because there is no need to have 16 exabyte memory addressing capability for anything but media encoders, giant databases, or extremely bloated single-threaded software. Sun Java Creator takes a heck of a lot of ram, but even at peak it's still under 4GB. If you move files bigger than 4GB, the ability to memory map all 4096MB might have less overhead on a 64-bit operating system, but generally from an end-user perspective, especially on a fast Intel or Opteron system, you won't notice the difference much. Solaris is bi-arch, a large chunk of Windows Vista and XP x64 is bi-arch, and most of FreeBSD and Linux are bi-arch in 64-bit versions, as I said, no point in making everything 64-bit. 64-bit device drivers is an issue for every OS, you should stick with 32-bit on a laptop, and hold off on desktops unless you need extended assembly registers available only in 64-bit mode.

Solaris-x86 mount fat32 partition, the partition max size limit?

solaris10 x86, laptop, 10G FAT32 partition for windows & x86 exchange data.
the fat32 partition mount as normal, can be read fine.
but write some file by x86, that can not find by windows.
anyboy know did the solaris-x86 mount fat32 partition, the partition max size limit? or no limit, why this problem occur?

Mounting Windows partition in Solaris
The easiest way to share data now is to do it through a FAT32 partition. Solaris
recognises it as partition of type pcfs. It is specified as device:drive where drive is
either the DOS logical drive letter (c through z) or a drive number (1 through 24).
Drive letter c is equivalent to drive number 1 and represents the Primary DOS partition
on the disk; drive letters d through z are equivalent to drive numbers 2 through 24,
and represent DOS drives within the Extended DOS partition.Syntax is
mount -F pcfs device:drive /directroy-name
where directory name specifies the location where the file system is mounted.
To mount the first logical drive (d:) in the Extended DOS partition from an IDE hard
disk in the directory /d use
mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c0d0p0:d /d
You can use mount directory-name after appending following line is in
/etc/vfstab file
device:drive directory-name pcfs no rw
for example
c0d0s0:c /c pcfs no rw
If your windows partition like the following means
C: - NTFS, D:-FAT32, E:-NTFS, F:-FAT32
Then you can only mount D, F not C & E.
Mounting D Drive:
mount -F pcfs /dev/disk/c0d0p0:c /mountpoint
Mounting F Drive
mount -F pcfs /dev/disk/c0d0p0:d /mountpoint
The driveletter only for fat not including other file systems (ntfs or any linux filesystems).

Solaris x86 with card on-board

Hi all,
I got a problem when installing Solaris9 x86 on ibm NetVista Machine.
I have installed 2 other machines with separated network card sucessfully. I can configure to connecto to my LAN network.
But when install on 2 ibm NetVista machines (which include onboard network card ), It is fail to be configured to connect to the network in both following cases:
Case 1: I choose proper driver as Sun suggest for Intel VE Pro(R) 10/100 : iprb. And the Solaris detect successfully. I checked by "ifconfig -a" and saw the network card active on "iprb0".
Next, I following correct instructions to configure the network card to connect to the LAN. But when i ping IP (9.187.186.18) to other computer in our same subnet LAN,
The system display eg: "No anwer from 9.187.186.18"
I run the "snoop" command to view broadcasr ARP in an other terminal. The snoop terminal displays ARP signal boradcasting from the Solaris. However, it can nerver get ARPs from other computer in LAN.
Case 2: I add 3COM network driver to the solaris ( onboard card is no loger used ). The system can auto-detected this card and i can configure to connect to the network. The problem remain unchange.
Is there any special in IBM Netvista machine need to be configure under Solaris x86 or any particular configuarion for on-board network card. ???
Can any boy help me to solve this problem ??
Best regards,
Thang,
Vietsoftware Developer

However, it can nerver get ARPs from other computer in LAN.Are you perhaps running "snoop" on a box different from the one that you're trying to ping, and are you using
a switched ethernet? In that case it would be OK if you only see the ARP broadcast, because the ping target
box will send the ARP reply directly to the MAC of the requesting station (i.e. there's no ARP broadcast reply),
and an ethernet switch will send the ARP reply directly to the port where the station with the given destination
MAC is connected - no other port should see the reply.
If you're trying to ping 9.187.186.18 from the new Solaris x86 box, try to run snoop on the 9.187.186.18
system. 9.187.186.18 should see the ARP broadcast from the LAN, and the 9.187.186.18 box should list the
ARP response it sends back to the LAN.
Is there any special in IBM Netvista machine need to be configure under Solaris x86 or any particular
configuarion for on-board network card. ???I guess the interrupt handler for the NIC is not working, so the Solaris x86 sees no incomming packets.
See the "troubleshooting" section on the following page:
http://solaris-x86.org/documents/tutorials/rtls.mhtml

Solaris x86 11/06 hung on Acer TravelMate 8210 Laptop

I've just installed Solaris x86 11/06 on my Acer TravelMate 8210 laptop. The installation was completed successfully. However, when the system is rebooted into Solaris, it is always hung at:
�Use is subject to license terms.�
This problem happens with both of the 32-bit and 64-bit kernel. While booting with the option �-kv�, the system always stops at:
�PCI Express-device: pci8086,2448@1e, pci_pci0
pci_pci0 is /pci@0,0/pci8086,2448@1e�
I�ve also tried to boot with the �-s� option, but it doesn�t help.
Is there anything else that I can try? Thank you in advance!
Here is my system spec:
http://reviews.cnet.com/Acer_TravelMate_8210_6597_Core_2_Duo_2_GHz_2_GB_RAM_160_GB_HDD/4507-3121_7-32114677.html?tag=nav
Before the installation, I ran the Solaris Installation Check Tool 1.2, and it said that the system is able to run Solaris.

I've just installed the Solaris Express DE 2/07 and still have the same problem.
Message was edited by:
ductuanon

Question about wide-screen monitor on Solaris x86

I have Solaris x86, version 10/2009 installed.
It works fine with any wide-screen monitor I plug in.
But when I use this 3rd party CAD/CAM software, any round
circle is being displayed as an oval shape. I believe that's because
on the wide-screen monitor, the width of the monitor is longer than the height.
Does anyone know if there's a setting to change so that I can view circles as true round circles instead of an oval shape? Thanks.

OK, I know what the problem is now.
But I need to change the resolution settings. Does anyone know how to change it on x86, version 10/2009?
I recall it being something like "kdmconfig"

Please suggest the fastest way to install Solaris x86 PC 30 boxes

I've already tested one and it's successfully installed.
I have to install 30 boxes , all are same spec.
Please advise the fastest procedure to install.
Note : There is no sparc machine.

Only problem with imaging a Solaris x86 box is that your machines will end up with the same hostid (which is pseudo-randomly generated at Solaris installation time for x86). This may, or may not, be a problem, depending on what commercial software you use...
To avoid this, you have to use jumpstart, or do some serious hacking.

Where can downloads oracle for solaris X86?

So that we may better diagnose DOWNLOAD problems, please provide the following information.
- Server name
- Filename
- Date/Time
- Browser + Version
- O/S + Version
- Error Msg

Besides click the ContactOTN in web page to submit the question
about this to them, I follow the link
http://platforms.oracle.com/sun/index_sun.htm and click "Ask Us"
link to send message to them too.
Am I wrong ? Can you give me the correct way to ask the question
KK
jeamaro (guest) wrote:
: KK (guest) wrote:
: : I read through the news group and find some mention there is
: : a version Oracle for solaris x86. Then I go to
: : http://platforms.oracle.com/sun/index_sun.htm too.
: : Can anyone tell me the straight method to get it ?
: : I have already sent several mail to ask about that.
: : There is nothing return.
: : KK
: There is a version of Oracle for Solaris x86. Although it has
: not been available thru OTN. To which email ID have you been
: sending your questions?
: Regards
null

F90 bug on solaris x86

Hello,
I have a short code to show a curious bug on solaris x86 when i compil it with f90 -O3.
Where can i send it to show this bug ?
Thanks

The bug ID for this problem is 6413443. It has been fixed in both the development release and the patch release. Fix should be available in the upcoming patches for Studio 11 and in the next release of Sun Studio Express - SSX3.
Best regards,
Boris

Dladm on solaris x86 snv_90 problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for