Document splitting not happening in New G/L

Hi
I have done all the below settings for document splitting.But still document splitting is not happening for vendor.For example,I am posting  the following entry.
Using FB60 Tcode
Cr Vendor 100
Dr G/L       60   (cost center 1)&(Profit center 1)
Dr G/L       40   (cost center 2)&(profit center 2)
when simulating I am expecting vendor entry also to be split and shown as
Cr Vendor 60  (profit center 1)
cr vendor  40 (profit center  2)
Dr   G/L    60
Dr   G/L   40.
But it is not spliiting Vendor.It is showing vendor as 100 but splitting the 60&40  to the ZERO balance clearing account( as configured in  ZERO balance clearing account step.)
why is vendor split not happening/Is there any thing I am missing?
Config steps done are as below.
The Steps to follow are:
1. Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting
2. Classify Document Types for Document Splitting
3. Define Zero-Balance Clearing Account 4. Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting
5.. Activate Document Splitting
thanks

Hi thanks all.
Sorry,I am new to new G/L concept and document splitting.Can you please check my following settings and confirm if they are fine.(I am doing in plain IDES system).
1.Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting>classify G/L Accounts  for document splitting>>
I have classified G/L Expenses accounts which I am using under tcode FB60(for simulation of document splitting) with category as 20000 u2013expense.Also I have given Vendor reconciliation account under category 01000-balance sheet account?
Please clarify how the G/L accounts classified here?
2. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting> Classify FI document types for splitting.
Many standard documents are defined.But I thought since I am using FB60 tcode it used doc type KR so mentioned mentioned transaction  as 0300 and variant as 0001 -Vendor invoice
3. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting>>Define ZERO balance clearing account
Here standard system has  account key 000(standard account for ZERO balance) with PK40/50  and G/L account for my chart of accounts is mentioned.
4. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting >>Define splitting characters for G/Lu2019s
Here I have mentioned Profit center field (ZERO balance ticked)&mandatory field ticked.no other fields defined.
5. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting >>Edit constants for non assigned processes
Here I have added my controlling area and left profit center field as blank.
Please check above settings and suggest me if I am missing any thing?All I am trying to do is post a simple test entry using FB60 and show the document splitting  based on just profit center.
regards

Similar Messages

  • Document Splitting not happening

    Dear Friends,
    I have done the configuration required for Document Spitting.
    When i post a document with expenses and tax from two cost centres which has two different profit centres then according to principle of document spliting the tax amount for which i dont give any cost object should get split proportionately into two profit centres. but....
    this split is not happenning in GL view but when i see the tables related to document splitting the values are split proportionately and stored in the respective tables. but not reflecting in GL view.
    Can any one tell me what could be the reason for this...
    I appreciate your timely response...
    Thanks and regards
    SAP user

    Dear All,
    Thank you very much for your timely response...
    I have maintained document number range in FAGL_DOCNR. The document type is IF for non-leading ledger.
    My doubt is
    1. should i maintain IF in leading ledger also and maintain number range in FBN1.
    2. Should i classify IF document for Document splitting.
    Thanks in advance.
    Sap user

  • Document Splitting not happening (only for one profit center  1000)

    Hi,
    The Bank GL account 13000010  is assigned a default Profit center 1110.
    After Posting an entry,
    ENTRY VIEW SHOWS
    Bank AC       CR.........                                             10000                                     (since default PC is 1110 )
              Vendor A/c             DR                                                                      10000              Profit center 1000
    whereas the same in GENERAL LEDGER VIEW shows
    Bank AC       CR.........                                             10000                                      Profit center 1110
              Vendor A/c             DR                                                                      10000              Profit center 1110       * * * *
    It does not take already defined  zero balance clearing account into consideration, and gives the above GL view output
    This is not the case with any other Profit centers i give in Vendor line item (The progfit center in case of vendor line item is derived from Cost Center Master Data)
    Also, If i post the same entry, giving Debit effect first,
    ENTRY VIEW
    Vendor A/c             DR                                                        10000              Profit center 1000
                   Bank AC       CR.........                                                      10000                                     (since default PC is 1110 )
    GENERAL LEDGER VIEW IS AS FOLLOWS:
    Vendor A/c             DR                                                        10000                         Profit center 1000
                   Bank AC       CR.........                                           10000                         Profit Center 1110                       
    Zero Balance Clearing a/c DR                                             10000                         Profit center 1000
                  Zero Balance Clearing a/c CR                               10000                         Profit Center 1110
    Here, It is taking Zero Balance Clearing account into consideration.
    Please assist on the same...........

    Dear
    Since default profit center 1110 is defined in fagl3keh system has taken correctly profit center as default profit center as 1110.  I could not understand how you can put profit center in vendor debit.  Since bank credit default profit center is 1110 naturally vendor debit is taken from the default profit center 1110 and vendor debit is also posted to profit center 1110 and not 1000.  Please check once again.  I think there is no difference if vendor is either posted first or second.  If you need to have debit as profit center as 1000 then you may have to choose bank account pertaining to profit center 1000.
    Regards

  • Automatic Batch Determination is not happening for New Sales Order Type

    Dear Experts,
      I have created a new sales order type ZBPY - For Free Sales, but automatic batch detrmination and batch pick up is not happening for new sales order type,  but it is activated for all the other sales order types in Production Server, can any body let me know the steps how to map this new order type to batch management and let it behave like other order types.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Saravanan(EKS).

    Hi Saravanan,
    Kindly check the following steps for automatic batch determination.
    1. First check the material is maintained with batch in the warehouse management.
    2. Maintain new entry for search procedure for batch determination with the new created doc type.
    3. Maintain new entry for automatic batch determination for sales order or automatic batch determination for delivery ( This depends on the business process of our client, whether they want to determine the batch with sales order or at the delivery level. check this and make new entry)
    4. Create Batch using T.code MSC1N with proper date of manuf. and SLED.
    5. Create Batch Search Strategy using T.code VCH1 with proper strategy type.
    6. Maintain stock with active batch. check this with t.code LS26 or LS24.
    regards
    Ravishankar M

  • Document splitting not working in MIGO/MIRO

    Hi Experts,
    I have the following PO, Account Assignment Categories, F:  Expected double entries are as follows:
    MIGO:
    Debit GL: Expense
    Credit GRIR:
    MIRO:
    Debit GRIR:
    Credit Vendor
    At my expese GL, I have cost center filled in; and in entry view I can read the cost center / profit center (and also segment) in MIGO / MIRO double entry.
    Problem: But, when I click on the General Ledger view, both MIGO/MIRO double entries do not have profit center/segment split.  All of the cost objects (cost center, profit center, segment) do not exist in the General ledger view (these fields are blank).
    Question:
    Does anyone have any idea?
    I believe this should be document splitting settings which are not correctly.  Therefore, does anyone have working splitting method of these MIGO/MIRO function?
    Thanks in advance,
    sbmel

    Dear,
    Please check what is the splitting characteristics you have defined in
    SPRO>IMG> Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)> Business transaction>Document Splitting>Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting, check whether you have defined Proce Center and Segment as the characteristics or not.
    Br, Vivek

  • Document splitting not working for customer & vendor Payment

    Hi,
    We have actived Document splitting on profit center for segment level reporting.
    In below scanario Document spliting working fine.
    Vendor Invoice (Docuement type - KR)
    General Ledger view
    Expense Dr 1000      PC1
    Vendor   Cr  1000     PC1
    At the time of Payment (General ledger view) (Document Type - KZ)
    Vendor Dr  1000        PC1
    Bank     Cr   1000       PC1
    In the above scanario we dont have any issue, Based on invoice profit center spliting automaticlly in bank in General Ledgerview.
    How ever in the below scanario Document spliting is not working in payment
    No issues in Invoice
    General ledger view
    Exp  Dr  1000 PC1
    Exp Dr   1500 PC2
    Vendor Cr 1000 PC1
    Vendor Cr 1500 PC2
    When we make payment to vendor Document splitting is not working, it get splitting in zero balance clearing account
    vendor Dr 1000 PC1
    Vendor Dr 1500 PC2
    Bank     Cr  2500  (No profit Center)
    Doc splitt A/C 1000
    Doc Split A/C  1000 PC1
    Doc Split A/C   1500
    Doc Split A/C    1500 PC2
    My Finance Team requires automatic split up in bank based on vendor profit center.
    We are using Business Transation 1000 (Payment) for document Type - KZ & DZ.
    Regards,
    Lokesh

    Can you please confirm if the following settings exist in your system in various IMG nodes.
    1. Bank G/L account is assigned to item category 04000 (IMG node: Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting).
    2. Document type KZ is assigned to business transaction 1000 and transaction variant 0001 (IMG node: Classify Document Types for Document Splitting).
    3. In IMG Node "Define Document Splitting Rule", under the method that is assigned to your company code, transaction 1000 and variant 0001, you see 04000 as one of the item categories to be edited.
    4. If the answer for (3) above is yes, if you double-click on 04000 item category line, the processing category is set to 1 (Splitting based on base item categories).
    5. Now when you double-click on 'Base item categories', you see 03000 - Vendor as one of the base item categories in the list there.
    Please respond with Y / N to the above questions and we can go from there.

  • Reversal of a reversed document should not happen

    Dears
    In our system, user is able to reverse an already reversed document, which should not happen.
    In the Message Control F5 361, nothing has been changed to make this warning or information.
    Hence the standard is 'error'. But why the system is allowing the reversal of  a reversed document then ?
    Could you please provide inputs ?

    Hello Nikitha,
    Please create one validation according to your requirement. PFB the relevant T codes to create validation.
    GGB0 - Create Validation
    OB28 - Activation of FI validations
    GCT9 - Transport: Validations
    Please let us know do you still require any more information
    Thanks & Regards,
    Lakshmi S

  • Document splitting data Table in New GL

    Hi,
    I am tryng to look at the split data for multiple documents in New GL.
    For example: I want to know what are the entries in the Zero balance clearing account that happened when the documents are split during this month.
    Obviously BSEG is not the table to look for..Do any one of you know what is the table to look for this data?
    Thanks and Regards
    Naveen

    FAGLFLEXA

  • Batch split not happening during delivery

    Hi Experts,
    I have enough of stock for a material with different batches (with different expiry dates). When I create an order for qty 100, system confirms it on a certain date taking 1st batch nearest to expiry date, as per the search startegy set in the cponfiguration.Please note here that the batch that system picks has got only 50 qty in stock, but it shows whole 100 qty against it. Probably because Batch split is not possible during sales order creation, hence system showing whole qty against one batch.
    Now, when I try to create delivery, it shows only 50 qty of the same batch in delivery document. I select the line item and go to the "Batch split" tab to effect batch split, but system does not allow. It says "Batch already specified for material".Here is the detail for your analysis-
    Batch in item 000010 already specified for material 2000978
    Message no. VL221
    Diagnosis
    The batch was either predefined in the sales order that the delivery is based on or it was assigned to the delivery item manually. Therefore, you can no longer carry out a batch split for the delivery quantity of the items.
    Procedure
    In order to make the batch split possible, you can cancel the assignment of the delivery item to the batch, if the delivery's processing status allows.
    Kindly advise.
    Thanks in advance,
    Randhir

    Thanks Mr. P Gomatheeswaran,
    Now batch is not being determined during sales order creation, that's fine.While creating delivery,when I select line item and go to Batch split tab I can see batches being split in two, which is OK. But when I try to put Picking quantity as delivery qty, system says "Picked quantity is larger than the qty to be delivered".(Message no. VL019).
    Also Storage location field is grayed out.
    Regards,
    Randhir

  • *.url document type not opening in new window

    I've successfully crawled in website shortcuts as *.url document types. However, after displaying the IIS security message, they open in the main portal window instead of opening in a pop-up window like other documents.
    Anyone have any ideas how I can get them to open in a new window?
    Thanks in advanced,
    Anne

    If you are creating the links with html (not using URL items) then just include target="_blank" in your link like <a href="#" target="_blank">your link</a> to open a link in a new browser window. If you are adding links to the page using URL items, then check the option to show the link in a new browser window. Note: if you are using an HTML Content Layout template and have applied it to the item region where you are publishing your URL items, then you will need to include conditional statements in the template to check for that (e.g. open link in new browser window) and include the correct target for the link based on what was selected for that item.

  • Document feeder not working on new 8610

    The document feeder does not work on my new Hp Officejet Pro 8610.   This is the first time I have tried it since we purchased it.   (The copying function itself works with regard to an original placed on the glass by hand.)  On sliding paper into the document feeder, there is a "ding ding" and the display panel lights.   If I try to scan, I get a message "Scanner lid or document feeder open" and it will not feed in the sheet of paper. If I try to copy, I get the same message (although first it produced one blank piece of paper). 

    Hello , and welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience! I see you're having issues regarding your paper feed.  I'd like to help! I would recommend removing the ink cartridges from the printer, and perform a power reset.  Disconnect the power cord from the printer and the power outlet, then wait 60 seconds. After 60 seconds, plug the printer back in. Ensure you plug the printer directly to a wall outlet. Make sure to bypass any sort of surge protector or power bar. I would also suggest plugging the printer power into a different wall outlet. Good luck and please let me know the results of your troubleshooting steps. Thank you for posting on the HP Forums!

  • Primary cost component split not happening

    Hello Experts,
    I am trying to create a Primary cost component split for Products with following settings
    1. Creation of Primary cost component structure "1N" and marking it as Primary cost component
    2. Assigning the Primary cost elements to the Cost component structure
    3. Assigning the Primary cost component structure for the Company code and Plant
    4. Assigning the Primary cost component structure to "Version" under "Price calculation" tab.
    5. Activity type with Activity type category "1- Manual entry, Manual allocation" and Price Indicator "1 - Plan price, automatically based on activity"
    6. Activity output planning for Cost center
    7. Primary cost planning for the Cost centers
    8. Activity price calculation. (Update run) - Prices are changed in KP26 also
    9. After all the above steps I checked report S_ALR_87013644, Plan price is existing in the report as mentioned in SAP note: 1658589
    After all the above steps, I tried running Cost estimate for a product. I am getting the error message
    Cost element 90001 is not assigned to a cost component
    Message no. CK239
    Also, I am getting a message
    No structure could be determined for internal activity TEB (M0001)
    Message no. CK694
    Therefore the Cost component is showing only the Material component.
    Where "90001" is a secondary cost element. I am not sure why system is still searching for Secondary cost element where we have assigned Primary cost component structure. I also ensured that Primary cost elements used in planning are all assigned to a Component in Cost component structure.
    I checked for SAP note "1736332", which is not applicable for my system version. Current version of SAP_APPL is  Release 606 and Support package SAPKH60607.
    Please help. Am I missing any settings.
    Thank you in advance.
    Muneer Ahamed N

    Hi Muneer,
    Please check whether you have maintained cost center splitting structure properly and assigned to the respective cost center for which you have maintained output planning and input planning.
    This splitting structure is much required because there only we maintain the relationship between primary cost elements and activities.
    Coming to your first message, yes system expects maintenance of secondary cost elements also in the cost component structure which is not primary CCS.
    Inorder to show primary cost component structure view:
    First, system calculates the direct activity cost in terms of secondary cost elements...
    Next, it verifies the cost center splitting structure you made,
    Then, system is going to convert the direct activity cost in terms of primary cost elements based on the splitting structure and Finally displays the primary cost component view
    I suppose second message speaking about cost center splitting structure only, please go through it carefully
    Other than these whatever the process you specified is right only..
    Regards...
    Jose

  • Balance carry forward not happening for new entity

    Hello Gurus,
    We added mid 2009 a new entity to be consolidated.
    The balance carry forward assigns the last year results to retained earnings, this is the same accross all entities.
    When executing the task in the monitor, there is no error message but it does no work, results end-up on a difference elimination item.
    For all other entities, it works fine.
    I wonder if there is a configuration that I overlooked.
    Many thanks for you inpput.
    Alex-

    So you are saying that for all other consolidation units, the Balance CarryForward (BCF) was successful?
    but for only one unit is was not successful?
    - I suggest to you that one of the following has occurred;
    1. there is no data against the balance sheet items for that unit (go to totals records to confirm YTD balance last year for all Balance Sheet items for that cons unit)
    2. there is only data against a specific item that has been set to carryforward to the "elimination" item that you mentioned (check the BCF items to be carried forward confgiuration)
    3. there is only data against Balance Sheet items that have been configured NOT to be carried forward (check the BCF config)
    4. you have configured some items incorrectly as Item Type; Income Statement or Statistical instead of Balance Sheet.
    5. You have missed the consolidation unit from the hierarchy for p1, 2010 (please also check the combinations if it is a matrix consolidation unit) so the BCF is not running for that unit at all
    Checking these 5 should get you closer to the answer

  • Splitting not happening correctly to activity types -KSII

    Hi ,
    As part of month end closing process we have run the assesment (KSU5) and there after the cost has been allocated to the cost centers .
    One cost center 1015090 gets all the cost from assesment ie all cost on that cost center is secondary .
    When i am trying to run KSII i am getting the following error message
    "Cost center CTR 1000/1015090, cost element 680100: Splitting is not possible
    Message no. KD302
    Pls advise.

    Hello,
    I believe these notes can help:
    418445  Error message KD302 seems unjustified
    772794  -> explains the splitting steps
    Also helpful:
    Splitting is not possible.: Message no. KD302
    Error message KD302
    Regards,
    Lucas

  • In KP26 excel uploading not happening with +new values+

    Kp26 the users  is doing thorugh EXCEL upload
    wants to update NEW activity  values even if Costs already posted ?
    But manually we are able to delete the values and update, but for large employee turnovers
    we cannt do it manually, so they are looking for update option which will
    erase the current data and update the fresh ones?
    the following error message appears when we try with delete button?
    The following is the error message
    Costs already posted under cost element SEC_ACT_CO. No deletion possible
    Message no. K8098
    Diagnosis
    You want to delete business process or cost center/activity type 5000010114/LE6047.
    However, you have already posted actual costs in version 0 in fiscal year 2011 under cost element SEC_ACT_CO.
    System Response
    The deletion may therefore not be executed.
    Procedure
    First reverse the posted record under cost element SEC_ACT_CO.
    Alternatively you can set all fields to zero in the plan record you have just selected. This corresponds to a deletion of the activity types/business process quantity planning on object 5000010114/LE6047.
    If the message appears several times in the error log, it could be that the actual records were posted under different transaction currencies. In this case, you must delete them all.
    Edited by: melgibson on Feb 1, 2012 4:08 PM

    thankx for the reply
    But in our case the while we checked periodwise values are not the difference which are getting posting
    rather 100 is getting multiplied with the old values.
    the Acvtivity price  was 10 for 01 to 12 periods we changed to 100
    New value     old value      posted amounts
    100     7.37     73.7
    100     7.36     73.6
    100     7.31     73.1
    100     9.5     95
    100     9.9     99
    100     11.23     112.3
    100     11.22     112.2
    100     11.22     112.2
    100     11.22     112.2
    100     11.23     112.3
    100     11.22     112.2
    100     11.22     112.2
    the user changes period values some times thats the reason above table shows different figlures
    But as per the delta logic it should be as follows
    New value     old value      User rquires
    100     7.37     100     
    100     7.31     100
    100     9.5     100
    100     9.9     100
    100     11.23     100
    100     11.22     100
    100     11.22     100
    100     11.22     100
    100     11.23     100
    100     11.78             100
    100     11.22      100
    But here the requirement is little peculiar,
    The user wants to update plan data , irrespective whether it is existing or not, with fresh
    figures which should equally distribute periodwise (not according to delta logic)  as shown above
    all should become 100?
    How that can be achieved?
    Edited by: melgibson on Feb 3, 2012 11:59 AM
    Edited by: melgibson on Feb 6, 2012 1:09 PM
    Edited by: melgibson on Feb 15, 2012 8:43 AM
    Edited by: melgibson on Feb 15, 2012 8:47 AM

Maybe you are looking for