Doubt in Extended Syntax check

Hi all ,
              I am facing a problem when i do a Extended Syntax check for a program . The message i am getting is as follows :
Messages for CALL FUNCTION interfaces(Todo Prio3)
Program:  SAPLZC_BWSPI  Include:  LZC_BWSPIF01  Row:    496  [Prio 3]
No EXCEPTION to set SY_SUBRC Declared for CALL FUNCTION 'FIRST_DAY_IN_TP_GET'
Thus the value of SY-SUBRC is always 0
(The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
can anyone suggest me how to correct it .
thanks,
kumaran

SUPPOSE IF YOU HAVE YOUR CODE AS :
CALL FUNCTION XYZ
IMPORTING -
EXPORTING----
JUST WRITE
CALL FUNCTION XYZ                  "#EC *
IMPORTING -
EXPORTING----
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
ENDIF.
THATS ENOUGH.
OR ELSE TRY.
CALL FUNCTION XYZ                
IMPORTING -
EXPORTING----
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.                       "#EC *
ENDIF.

Similar Messages

  • Warning in query in Extended Syntax Check

    Hi all,
    I perform Extended Syntax Check.
    It generates following warning for the query: -
    In "SELECT SINGLE....", the WHERE condition for the key field "MATNR" does not test for equality. Therefore the single record in question may not be unique.
    (You can hide the message using "#EC *)
    Please tell me what does it mean. How can I suppress this warning?
    Regards,
    Saurabh A. Buksh

    Hi,
    whenu r using select single use a variable or a workarea don't use tables.
    select single matnr from mara into v_matnr
    where matnr in s_matnr.
    also as it is warning message u can neglectit .
    when u  r using select single u should give entire key information also.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj
    Message was edited by: nagaraj kumar nishtala

  • Extended Syntax Check  in abap code

    Hi Guys,
    We are upgrading from 4.6 C to ECC 6.0.  When I do the Extended Syntax check for the custom function module it gives me the following error.  Please help.
    The EXCEPTION "REPORT_NOT_EXISTENT" is not defined in the interface of the function module "RS_VARIANT_CONTENTS" "RS_VARIANT_CONTENTS".  Internal Message Code: MESSAGE G-7. 
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC ARGCHECKED)
    Regards,
    Shankar

    <b>Don't suppress the message. </b> You should only suppress messages if you are aware of why they are appearing, and they are not an error.
    What it means is, that in your custom function module, there is some code like
    CALL FUNCTION 'RS_VARIANT_CONTENTS'
      EXPORTING
        report                     = v_report
        variant                    = v_variant
    EXCEPTIONS
       VARIANT_NON_EXISTENT        = 1
       VARIANT_OBSOLETE            = 2
       REPORT_NOT_EXISTENT         = 3
       OTHERS                      = 4
    But if you look at FM rs_variant_contents, you'll see this exception is not defined.  The correct course of action is to remove it from your call.
    matt

  • Error in Extended syntax check- Select Query

    Hi all,
    Iam getting this following error in Extended syntax check
    " Large table PA0002: No field of a table index in WHERE
    condition"
    Code :SELECT SINGLE PERNR INTO (G_PERNR) FROM PA0002 WHERE ZZLEGACY_PAYROLL = I_FILETAB-PRNO
                                                           AND ZZLEGACY_PAYSYS = I_FILETAB-PRSYS
                                                           AND ZZLEGACY_PAYINS = I_FILETAB-PRINS.
    can anyone help on this?

    Hi,
    Change the code like this and check............
    For this u need put INSIDE LOOP.
    Select single PERNR into G_PERNR from PA0002 where PERNR = I_FILETAB-PRNO and .......... and ......
    Check like this...
    Thanks.
    If this helps you reward with points.
    Message was edited by: KDeepak
    Message was edited by: KDeepak

  • Error in extended syntax check

    HI all,
    I have declared some constants like this.
    constants: c_str1(20) value 'abcdefg,,,,,',
                    c_str2(4) value 'xyz',
                    c_str(30).
    concatenate c_str1 c_str2 into c_str.
    I am getting an error for c_str1 in extended syntax check that 'charetecter strings without text elements will not be translated'.
    I am not writing c_str1 anywhere and I just need it for concatenation.
    When I tried like this
    constants: c_str1(20) value 'abcdefg,,,,,,,'(000).
    It is showing a sysntax error that offset is not allowed.
    Please provide me the answer.
    Regards,
    Mungala.

    hi Praveena,
    do this way
    concatenate text-001 text-002 into c_str.
    double click on text-001 and text-002 and create text elements with abcdefg,,,,,' and 'xyz' values. In 4.6 and above versions .. you got to save and activate ...else just save to remove that error .
    REgards,
    Santosh

  • Regardding Extended syntax check of one program from another program

    Hi,
    I have one issue related to Extended syntax check.
    I am working on one report [<b>REPORT2</b>] from that i am doing extended syntax check of another Report [<b>REPORT1</b>] which is already developed.
    For that i have use <b>F.M</b> <b>EXTENDED_PROGRAM_CHECK</b> it returns no of errors of <b>REPORT1</b> now my issue over here is i want to output all the errors of <b>REPORT1</b> into REPORT2 output with <b>Line No & Error Message</b>.
    How can i solve this issue!
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Deep.

    Hi ,
      You can use the FM <b>EXTENDED_PROGRAM_CHECK_SHOW</b> , to get the details of the check.
    Regards
    Arun

  • Regarding Extended Syntax Check

    hi,
    during extended syntax check the given program is read and obsolete statements is displayed.
    from where it compares for obsolete statement.
    is there any table? if not then how it compares for obsolete statement.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Check the table RODIR...here you can give the object type and its name...and there is a field which indicates if it is Obsolete or not. If it is checked, then it is Obsolete..otherwise not.
    Vishwa.

  • Extended syntax check

    In ECC 6.0, I have two errors in my extended syntax check
    1).   Char. strings w/o text elements will not be translated:
    'Store%'
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC NOTEXT)
    with below coding
    SELECT  kunnr name2 j_3astcu
        FROM kna1
        INTO TABLE gt_kna1
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_soldto1
        WHERE ( name2    LIKE 'STORE%'
         OR     name2    LIKE 'Store%'
         OR     name2    LIKE 'store%'
         OR     name2    LIKE 'DC%'
        AND     land1    =    'US' )
        OR   ( j_3astcu  = gt_soldto1-store_no
        AND    land1     = 'US' ).
    2).
    SELECT-OPTIONS : s_mail1 FOR somlreci1-receiver NO INTERVALS.
    The current ABAP command is obsolete
    With "LOOP AT itab", one of the additions "INTO", "ASSIGNING", or "TRANSPORTING NO
    FIELDS" is required in the 00 context
    Internal Message Code: LOOP 012
    (The message cannot be hidden using pseudo-comment "#EC .., bzw. durch SET
    EXTENDED CHECK OFF/ON)
        LOOP AT s_mail1.
    *-----If email id entered on the selection screen doesnot contain
        '@' and '.', then give relevent message to user as popup.*
          IF s_mail1-low NA gc_at OR s_mail1-low NA gc_dot.
            MESSAGE e038(zs) WITH text-m08 text-m09 text-m13.
          ENDIF.
        ENDLOOP.
    Please suggest me howcan I avoid string Store% as well as select-option.

    In my opinion, the answers given to your first question so far, are wrong.  When there is a specific reason for using a text string in a select, then it should remain precisely as that.  So you should use "#EC NOTEXT.  It is wrong to put them in a text element, as they will never be translated.
    The extended syntax check doesn't exist so that you can remove the cause, it is so that you can address it.  Many violations of the extended syntax checker have a valid reason.  That's why you get the "#EC exceptions.  But if you use them, then make sure you can justify it.
    matt

  • Extended syntax checks off

    I have a program which has the extended syntax checks turned off and only turned on again after all the form pools, checks and update routines are performed. Is there any security implication from this extended check being off considering that it makes no sence to secure it with an authorization group?
    Message was edited by: jbussche
    AH! I see that I forgot to say "please".  )
    Does anyone have any infos on this other than the abap keyword documentation, please?
    Message was edited by: jbussche

    Hello Julius,
    I don't see any serious security implication with the extended syntax checks turned off. (But it might have implications to the quality of the program...)
    You run the (extended) syntax checks during development.
    There is one check which is related to security: The authorizations test checks whether the specified authorization object occurs in the table TOBJ and whether the authorization fields are correctly specified. -> This test checks the syntax of AUTHORITY-CHECK statements.
    Authorization groups are not related to the extended syntax check: The system checks the authorization for the authorization object S_PROGRAM based on an authorization group assignment before starting a report.
    Kind Regards
    Frank Buchholz
    Checking a Program
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d1/801af0454211d189710000e8322d00/frameset.htm

  • Extended syntax check how to remove warning

    I get the following WARNING message in extended syntax xheck.
    How to remove it.
    INT_TABLE stands for 2 fields: Table INT_TABLE[] and its header line           
    Field INT_TABLE is not referenced statically in the program       
    Here is the definition of int_table
    TYPES : BEGIN OF x_table,
              SIGN(1) TYPE C,
              OPTION(2) TYPE C,
              LOW(10) TYPE C,
              HIGH(10) TYPE C,
            END OF x_table.
    int_table    TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF x_table.             
    Int_table is used in a function module as a TABLE parameter in the form,
    In the perform S_user_field is used

    Hi,
    Do some kind of check for ur interanl table in the program.
    if not INT_TABLE[] is initial.
    endif.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj

  • How to rectify Extended Syntax check warning , when object REF TO is used..

    hi all,
    when  running "Extended program check " for the below , I am getting warning error when I delcare the below stmts.
    DATA: go_alv  TYPE REF TO cl_salv_table.
            lo_selections   TYPE REF TO cl_salv_selections,
          lo_display_settings
                        TYPE REF TO cl_salv_display_settings,
        lo_events       TYPE REF TO cl_salv_events_table,
        lo_content_top  TYPE REF TO cl_salv_form_element,
    THE MESSAGE ARE
    Field GO_ALV is not referenced statically in the program                
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC *)                                                                               
    Program:  ZJTEST  Row:     69                                     
    Field LO_EVENTS is not referenced statically in the program             
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC *)                                                                               
    Program:  ZJTEST  Row:     74                                     
    Field LO_DISPLAY_SETTINGS is not referenced statically in the program   
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC *)                                                                               
    Program:  ZJTEST  Row:     76                                     
    Field LO_SELECTIONS is not referenced statically in the program         
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC *)        
    is there any way I can avoid this warning message apart using #EC ??? is there any way to avoid this ??/
    kindly help
    thanks

    In Program
    a)
    DATA: lo_top_element TYPE REF TO cl_salv_form_layout_grid,
             lo_grid      TYPE REF TO cl_salv_form_layout_grid,
             lo_header    TYPE REF TO cl_salv_form_header_info,
             lo_label     TYPE REF TO cl_salv_form_label,
             lo_text      TYPE REF TO cl_salv_form_text,
             lo_logo      TYPE REF TO cl_salv_form_layout_logo,
             lv_logo      TYPE bds_typeid,
             lv_title_h   TYPE sytitle.
    TYPES:  ty_logo(70)  TYPE c.
      CONSTANTS:
            lc_alv_logo                TYPE ty_logo VALUE 'CE_NEW_LOGO'.
      CREATE OBJECT lo_top_element
          EXPORTING
            columns = 3.
      lo_grid = lo_top_element->create_grid( row = 3
                                            column = 1 ).
      CONCATENATE 'Header ' 'Information' INTO
                         lv_title_h SEPARATED BY space.
    Row 1 header information is set
      lo_header = lo_grid->create_header_information(
         row     = 1
         column  = 1
         text    = lv_title_h
         tooltip = lv_title_h ).
      lo_grid->add_row( ).
    Row 2 Doc. date is set
      lo_label = lo_grid->create_label(
        row     = 2
        column  = 1
        text    = text-b02
        tooltip = text-b02 ).
      lo_text = lo_grid->create_text(
        row     = 2
        column  = 2
        text    = s_docket-low
        tooltip = s_docket-low ).
      lo_text = lo_grid->create_text(
        row     = 2
        column  = 3
        text    = s_docket-high
        tooltip = s_docket-high ).
      lo_grid->add_row( ).
      CREATE OBJECT lo_logo.
      lo_logo->set_left_content( lo_grid ).
      lv_logo = lc_alv_logo.
      lo_logo->set_right_logo( lv_logo ).
      pt_content_top = lo_logo.
    Extended program check :
    No read access to field LO_HEADER             
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC NEEDED)  
    No read access to field LO_LABEL              
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC NEEDED)  
    No read access to field LO_TEXT               
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC NEEDED)  
    Kindly giude

  • Extended syntax check for include structure

    Hello Everyone,
    While declaring the internal table as:
    TYPES: BEGIN OF t_data.
            INCLUDE STRUCTURE mara.
    TYPES: END   OF t_data.
    DATA: it_data TYPE table of t_data.
    When performing extended check, i get following error:
    The current ABAP command is obsolete and problematic, especially so in ABAP
    Objects
    Within classes and interfaces, you can only use "TYPE" to refer to ABAP Dictionary
    types, not "LIKE" or "STRUCTURE".
    I am using 4.7 version.
    Any clue how to avoid this error during extended check.
    Regards,
    Tarun

    Tarun,
    With WAS 6.20 you should not declare internal tables with header line or using the old syntax as they are not compatible with OO ABAP.
    So, you either declare a TYPE the way you have done, in case you want additional fields apart from the INCLUDE structure, or declare the table directly like the way I have shown.
    Good thing, you can even specify the type of internal table that you want to create using this - STANDARD, SORTED, HASH. These tables will help you with the performance issues.
    regards,
    Ravi
    Note : Please mark the helpful answers

  • Code Inspector and Extended program check in one program

    Hello SAP gurus,
    We have a requirement where we need to create one tool which will have both code inspector and extended program check functionality and report should display all error, warning messages which are found from these checks.
    Can anyone provide some suggestions on this?
    Thanks,
    Khushboo Dand

    Hi,
    Go  to Se38 and check how code inpsector and extended syntax check. I dont remember the exact function module name but just debug a little u will be able to find it.
    Nabheet

  • How to resolve Extended Systax check  Error..

    Hi All,
    In Syntax check i am not getting any errors,If  i have check Extended Syntax check I have got 2 error in SLIN ( Extended Syntax Check) Like
    ERRORS     :
    #Messages for MESSAGE(Error)
          Program:  ZMXXR600A  Row:    416
    No. of WITH fields of MESSAGE 021 for ID Z1: 1
    No. of placeholders in this message: 0
    Message: Non Statistical posting not allowed for Account 52979100
    No long text exists for this message
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
          Program:  ZMXXR600A  Row:    418
    No. of WITH fields of MESSAGE 022 for ID Z1: 1
    No. of placeholders in this message: 0
    Message: Please use the same IO to credit and debit
    No long text exists for this message
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
    The Code i write for this Eroors
    CASE SY-SUBRC.
              WHEN 0.
                MESSAGE S021 WITH P_FILE.     line :416
              WHEN 1.
                MESSAGE W022 WITH P_FILE.    line :418
              WHEN OTHERS.
            ENDCASE.
    P_FILE is declraed as;
    PARAMETERS: P_FILE   LIKE RLGRAP-FILENAME DEFAULT C_FILE.
    Can you give  some inputs to resolve the Errors ASAP.
    Thanks,
    Sridhar

    MESSAGE S021 WITH P_FILE. line :416
    WHEN 1.
    MESSAGE W022 WITH P_FILE. line :418
    in both messages & needed
    check 021 and 022 in both messages there is no <b>&</b> where you can place your actual value.
    for Ex: message 021
    Ex 1) hi print
    Ex 2) hi print <b>&</b>
    so now you can call this with
    1)MESSAGE S021 .
    2)MESSAGE S021 WITH P_FILE.
    as you not maintain & it is giving error for extended check so mention & where you want to print p_file
    or just call message with out passing P_file.
    Rewards if useful..........
            Minal Nampalliwar
    null

  • Transport Organizer Syntax Check using the Code Inspector

    dear fellows,
    i'm facing a problem when i check the syntax of transport. When i'm using the option to check the syntax within the transaction se01 the system starts no longer the extended check but the code inspector.
    is there any possibility to turn this code inspector check off and to get the extended syntax check again?
    or on the othe hand, which variant is used for the check and is there any possibility to change the variant that is used?
    thanks for your answers,
    Robert

    Nope... this is SAP standard code so I will reply to the OSS and wait for them to come back to you.
    Regards
    Juan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Changed IP address, how do I update the clients

    I've poked around but all I can find is info about how to change the IP address of a TC without additional information about what to do with existing clients. I'm not using a TC in this case (NAS frontended by a Mini providing AFP accesss), but I fig

  • HT6058 Anyone having trouble updating to iOS 7.0.4 on 2nd gen iPad?

    We are trying to use a flipped classroom and need to update to iOS 7.0.4 on the 2nd generation iPad.  It will not download.  Can anyone enlighten us on this matter?

  • MacBook Air WiFi issues

    Ok, I recently got a MacBook Air 2013 that it currently OS X version 10.8.3 and it's great except for its absolutely attrocious WiFi problems. For example, after awakening from sleep, the MacBook almost always requires my password for my network even

  • RE: WUF WHY NO ENTRY IN /SAPAPO/PROD_CD_READ - Display Change Documents

    G'day Team, I am working with client data team in SCM 7.0 and wanted a confirmation please.  Can you please confirm  that deletion of Product / Location from the Where used List ("WUF") does NOT appear in the /SAPAPO/PROD_CD_READ - Display Change Doc

  • Using symbols in a multicolum​n listbox

    I can't seem to show symbols in the second column of a multicolumn listbox. I tried some example code I found on NI.com and there seems to be something unique about the multicolumn list box they used in the example. If I put down a new one it doesn't