Doubts in creation of PO for service PR in classic scenario

Hi everyone,
I'm working with SRM 5.5 in a classic scenario.
I have the following process:
1. A PR for services is created in ECC (Item Category "D")
2. The PR is transferred to SRM as SC
3. A bid invitation is created in sourcing cockpit
4. A bid is accepted
5. A PO is created.
In the 5th step the PO is created locally in SRM. Is this the standard behavior?? Why is not created in R/3?
Thanks,
Ivá

Hi Ivan,
For scenario details pls refer below links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/d9/cbd33b8dca2c43e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/e9/d0fc3729b5db48e10000009b38f842/frameset.htm
What message do you get when you create a PO from Bid?
Are you able to execute the scenario for materials?
Regards,
Prashant

Similar Messages

  • SRM-SUS for Service Entry Sheets - Classic Scenario

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    Our client wants to use SRM-SUS for the Service Entry Sheets (to being with and then later expand more in other SRM areas). The lead system will be R/3 system.
    We will be going with ECC 6.0 and SRM 5.0.
    Service Order will be created in R/3 and replicated into SRM (SAP have said this is new functionality in SRM 2007 and SAP will provide us with this functionality in SRM 5.0 as well)
    SAP are also recommending using MDM for hosting the catalogs for service entry sheets to enable vendors to selete their items during the confirmation / filling the service entry sheets. - they say this is mandatory
    SAP are also asking for XI for the data to be transferred from R/3 to SRM (and may be vice versa) - they say this is mandatory.
    Few questions:
    1) What kind of hardware size are we talking about to have SRM-SUS, MDM, XI and Portal (PI)
    2) Are MDM and XI mandatory as said by SAP and if yes, in what scenarios. What is they way around
    3) How good is the functionality provided by SRM-SUS for Services? Is it as good as in R/3 (or even better)? We will be having complex Services in our scnearios.
    4) What can be a typical time to install SRM-SUS, MDM, XI and Portal in the Dev environment to get moving onto the project?
    An early response shall be highly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Rahul

    few answers to your questions
    1) what is the release of SRM  you want to work with?
    2) services in SUS is not available as standard , and will be provided by SAP as consulting up on request.
    3) for hardware requirements , please refer to the master guide for the srm release you will be working on -->
    and also you can refer to the software component matrix in master guide --> to see if any component is mandatory..
    4) XI and MDM as far as i know is mandatory for SRM 6.0 and above , But in SRM 5.0 , XI is compulsory.
    5) so xi is mandatory in anyway in SUS as different systems are involved and therefore is required for routing the documents correctly.
    6) time for installation again depends on your supplier base , and your level of expertise.
    7) it is not always recommended to compare between two different systems , R/3 and SUS are different and so functionality will not be the same
    8) but as far as i know R/3 is stronger functioanlly..

  • Quotation Creation and Billing for Service Orders--node details needed

    Hi ,
    I need to work on node "Quotation Creation and Billing for Service Orders" ....I see lot of integration with SD and FICO . Can any one give details about integrations required and what is done in this node ....
    Regards
    NPB

    There are different steps to be done for that.
    1. Create DIP Profile in ODP1 & check the consistency in ODP2 - DIP will be used to bill the customer based on resource (labor & material) usage. Creation of DIP profile has been discussed many times in this forum. Please check.
    2. Assign the Quotation document type & Billing type used in DIP profile to your sales area - Your document type should be assigned to your sales organisation, distribution channel & division combination.

  • Services in extended classic scenarios

    Friends,
    We have implemented services in extended classic scenario. When we create a shopping cart with two service lines and same product category here is what happens:
    The SRM PO has two lines items but in the backend the PO is replicated with one Po line item and the two service lines from the shopping cart. This causes a inconsistency with the SRM PO line item number and R/3 PO line item number.
    Please advise. Any help is greatly appreciated

    Hi Donna,
    Is is standard functionnality as the backend PO has item type "D" for service in the first line.
    Then for sub item, only limits or services (Id or description) are allowed.
    The first line is dedicated to product category.
    All sublines belonging to this product category are implemented in the sub item in the service tab.
    I have opened an OSS message too but for other services bugs.
    Please post SAP answers to update SDN community
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • Automatic creation of Reservation for Service Order (Return and Repair)

    Hi, Looking for your valuable help on Creation of Automatic Reservation
    I am working on Return and Repair process at Plant.
    1) So far
    Service Notification > Repair Order > Return Delivery > Service order . has been done.
    now requirement is when i am saving the service order for the Object (Fisnished Goods), in which components  required for servicing of material are maintained, when i will save the order a Reservation for the same needs to be reaised to Warehouse automatically.
    2) In Repair order all operation and components are not reflecting when i am selecting the line item and going to EDIT > Display Range > All Items in VA02 for which i need to do DP90.(Resource Related Billing)
    Please hepl,
    Thanks
    SUDIP SINHA

    Thanks for giving valuable answer,
    what if in the service order i am replacing some spare parts along with services when FERT is not under warranty. How the cost will be transfered to invoice. In my case only one service is transfered.
    i waqnted to transfer cost of components as well..
    Thanks
    SUDIP SInha

  • Creation of Inbound delivery mandatory for ASN process in classic scenario?

    Dear Experts,
    We are going for classic scenario for our green field SRM implementation process. Our client is not using  ASN process in their existing MM process. However, they are now looking for an oppurtunity to enable Suppliers to trigger ASN using SUS. In such case, is creation of inbound delivery from Buyer side a mandatory process?
    Is the below the process correct?
    PO -> ASN (Supplier using SUS) -> Inbound delivery (Optional) -> Goods Receipt (Mandatory) -> Invoicing.
    Here, I understand that Goods receipt can be verified against the PO or via Inbound delivery to PO. ASN will inform the store keeper in advance about impending goods receipt and smoothen the confirmation process.
    Could you please comment on the above process? Could you please suggest the best practices followed here?
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan
    Ranjan Sutradhar

    Hey Ranjan!,
    You are on track.
    The process flow you have shown is true. ASN is available as a standard as part of the MM-SUS process. It makes the buyer aware of any delays in delivery or to make arrangements on shipping docks to receive goods on a said date etc.
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • Doubts in PO's after a Bid invitation in Classic Scenario

    Hello everyone,
    I am working in SRM 5.0 in a classic scenario. I have a doubt, I do de following:
    1. Create a PR in R/3
    2. Replicate the PR in SRM as SC
    3. Create a Bid invitation form the SC
    4. Accept a Bid
    5. Create a PO
    In the 5th step, the PO is created in both system (SRM and R/3). Is this correct?
    I though that only the PO is created in R/3.
    Thanks
    Ivá

    Hi Ivan,
    Pls see this thread which discusses abt the workaorunds for your requirement to create the PO in R/3 backend instead of locally in  SRM.
    Re: Regarding direct material procurement in Classic scenario.
    BR,
    Disha.
    Do reward points for useful answers.

  • R/3 Backend PO in SRM for Confirmation in Ext. classic scenario

    Hi,
    We are on SRM 4.0, Extended classic scenario
    User created STO(Stock transport order) in backedn R/3(Not in SRM) and is visible in "Confirmation /GR services" in SRM.
    But when user tries to do confirm it the items are not available and confirmation is not possible in SRM.
    Is there anything missing in the system ? Please suggest
    Best regards,
    Sambit

    it should be updated by running standard progarams which updated the status of the corresponding documents in R/3

  • Info Record Not Appearing for all materials in classic scenario.

    HI ALL, 
                I am working on Classic Scenario and all the follow-on documents are getting created properly. But the problem is With SOS. Currently i am able to view the info record for only one of my material, I am also referring backend contracts through vendor list. The contracts are visible in SOS.
               Can somebody pls put a light as to why for other materials the info records is not displayed in SOS, is there a report which has to be run to get the info record into SRM from ECC. If not then how does the system bring these contracts and info record from ECC to SRM.
              I am working on SRM 5.0 and ECC 5.0.
    THANKS AND REGARDS
    Debu

    Hi
    Please read this as well.
    <u>You have created sources of supply. These could be:
    -> Contract items in Enterprise Buyer
    -> Vendor-specific prices
    For this, you have created Product Linkages in the SRM System with vendor-specific prices via the SAP Menu Master Data -> Products -> Process Products.
    -> Entries in the vendor list of Enterprise Buyer
    In Customizing you have assigned product categories to which the system is to automatically group requirements and you have scheduled report BP_SC_TRANSFER_GROUPED to run periodically.
    For more information, see the Supplier Relationship Management Implementation Guide (IMG): SRM Server -> Sourcing ->  Define Interactive Sourcing for Product Categories.</u>
    Sourcing is completely integrated with the global availability check in SAP APO and executes a vendor search. You can activate third-party order processing in the check instructions by choosing how you want the system to start sourcing and which sourcing method you want to use for it. There are two different options here:
    &#9675;     If you want the products to be delivered exclusively by external vendors, the system performs sourcing directly at the external vendors without evaluating internal locations. For this, SAP APO requires corresponding purchasing records, delivery plans and contracts that are transferred from SAP ECC.
    &#9675;     If you only want to have products delivered by external vendors occasionally, that is to say, if you are unable to deliver the product from your own warehouse stock, choose an ATP profile in which both internal and external vendors are evaluated. In this case, the external vendor is treated like an internal location in SAP APO, and is integrated into location determination in the rule-based availability check.
    You can also choose the vendor manually. If you have already specified a vendor as the source of supply in SAP CRM, SAP SCM does not carry out any further sourcing. In this case, SAP SCM merely checks the validity of this vendor and confirms the requirement in its full amount if the vendor is valid.
    For more information, see SAP Library for SAP SCM at SAP Advanced Planning and Optimization (SAP APO) -> Global Available-to-Promise (Global ATP) -> Advanced Availability Check Methods -> Third-Party Order Processing in the Global ATP -> Sourcing in Third-Party Order Processing.
    <u>Refer these links for more details -></u>
    <u>Assignment of Existing Sources of Supply</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/25/40f23a53cd0e04e10000000a11402f/content.htm</b>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/55/4af548688211d4977e0004ac962ee6/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/fa/84944279c0c66ae10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/18/db183d30805c59e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/63/36f2323326da4da25d9d0a06f550a0/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>Processing Contracts</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/43/0f234a9e242a8be10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/5a/4cc5376848616ae10000009b38f889/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>See also</u><b>SAP Note 519794 EBP: Replication of Materials exclusively for Purchasing
    SAP Note 505030 (Restrictions for the integration of external requirements).</b>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Inforecord price for SRM originated orders - CLASSIC scenario

    Hi! Few months' back, I have posted some questions re the behaviour of the price on the PO when orders are generated out of SRM in a classic scenarioI have just completed testing and ended up with the following results:
    1. If I create a shopping cart with material number for direct consumption and have a vendor defaulted from vendor list, the price reflected in the PO is from the inforecord. So, effectively, I could have $1000 on my shopping cart but PO showing $950 as this is the value in the inforecord. The $1000 comes from the material condition record in SRM (extracted via EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES).
    2. If I create a shopping cart with material number for STOCK and have a vendor defaulted from vendor list, the price reflected in the PO is that maintained on the shopping cart. Is this behaviour correct? Note that in this case, the master PO is in SRM even in a classic scenario and I wonder whether it is because of this that the pricing behaviour is different.
    Other observation: For stock purchase, I know that if I have multiple vendors (from vendor list and some from inforecords) and if I picked one of the vendors, the price will be adopted at the point of shopping cart so that the user has a 'confirmed' view of the price and there should be no discrepancies of prices between the shopping cart and the PO.
    Can someone please shed some lights as to what should the standard behaviour be?
    Cheers!
    SF

    hello SF
    rule :- shopping cart price is a material  price and it comes from your report and prices are stored in COMMPR01 .(  EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES BY this report).
    really the prices are picked from source of suooly like infor record , vendor list  or contract while creating the purchase order.
    i create a shopping cart for 100 USD since material price is 100 usd but PO created for 75 USD.
    since contract material price is 75  usd.
    With regards to using report EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES to upload the
    prices from the backend system into EBP. Please refer to the online
    documentation of this report:
    'Under "Price reference per product", you can specify if the average
    value of all valuation groups/plants is to be calculated or if the
    valuation price from the first valuation group/plant is to be used. If
    the average value is to be calculated, choose "Average of all prices".
    If you wish to use the first valuation price, choose "Use first price".
    The standard setting calls for the "Average of all prices" to be
    calculated.'
    This is how this report works. If you want to take another price you
    have to change the coding according your requirements.
    You will need to debug into the backend through
    RFC-Call for backend-table MBEW
    CALL FUNCTION 'RFC_READ_TABLE' DESTINATION iv_rfcdest
    in FORM read_mbew and see the select statement that reads this table.
    The report is taking exactly one price out of the data
    package extracted out of R/3. If this could also be a moving average
    price is more a question which kind of data is extracted out of of R/3
    and how the R/3 config looks like - and if this moving average is in thelist.

  • Output(print out) in SRM for backend PO in Classic scenario

    Hello,
    My requirement is to take print out for the backend PO created thru shopping cart in classic scenario.
    i know for extended classic scenario Actions works as in that case PO is created locally and then replicated.
    But in the classic Scenario where the PO is in backend, can we take print out in SRM becasue the detials of that Po is available in SRM to in Fllow up documents in SRM 5.0.
    is there any standard way available to achieve that.
    Thanks
    Robin

    Hi Sarabjeet,
    It does not make sense to print PO from SRM in classic scenario because there is no PO in SRM at all !
    In classic scenario, PO is created only in the backend.
    Only shopping cart is created in SRM.
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • ATP Check for service parts and procurement scenario

    Dear Experts,
    We're testing CRM service scenario, focusing on the ATP check.
    After running the avaiability check for the service parts in the service order,
    is it posssible to determine the scenario automatically as follows?
    - when the necessary parts items are not available
    -> "Procurement" scenario will be used.
    The corresponding documents such as PO, PR or Reservation will be generated in ERP according to the setting "Define Logistics Scenario for the Procurement of Materials and Services".
    - when the necessary parts items are available in stock
    -> "Material withdrawal" scenario will be used. The items will be withdrawn at the service confirmation.
    From our understanding, the determination of the above scenario is controlled by the item type(ex.SRVP),
    so we expect that the system sets the appropriate item type depending on whether the item is available or not.
    Is there any possible solution for this?(i.e.standard customizing, BAdI etc....)
    Any advice would be higly appreciated.
    Best regards,
    F.T.

    Hi F.T,
    I have worked in Service Order Management Scenario, but not integration of Service Orders for ATP Check. But I found this Presentation which I hope might be somewhat helpful regarding the feasibility of the Business Scenario. You can have look at  the same and will be able to decide if this is the correct way forward or not.
    [Presentation|http://www.google.co.in/#hl=en&biw=1366&bih=548&q=ATPCheckforservicepartsandprocurementscenarioinSAPCRM+++&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=a254323013e5943b]
    Hope this will help.
    Thanks,
    Samantak.

  • :):(Creation of RFX or LAC in a Classic Scenario:):(

    Hi Guys,
    I was wondering if you guys could come up with some nice suggestions on how i should go ahead and process my requirements.
    We are implementing a SRM 4.0 (classic scenario) system. I am aware that all shopping carts in SRM are created and transferred to the backend as a PO/PR according to our customization and nothing goes to the sourcing cockpit when a vendor is not assigned in a classic scenario.
    <b>Implementation of a classic scenario restricts one to create a Bid or a Live Auction from the sourcing cockpit. Can all the SRM GURUS suggest me in what way one could push the requirements to the bidding engine or to the Live Auction Cockpit in a CLASSIC SCENARIO</b>.
    I hope i would get great responses.
    Thanks
    Sunny

    Hello Sunny,
    there has never been such limitations.
    Classic scenario is supported by Sourcing Cockpit & Bidding Engine in SRM 4.0, at the condition that a classic SC is created in SRM.
    In sourcing customizing, you can decide to send all SC without source of supply to the Sourcing Cockpit.
    You can even decide to initiate directly an RFX, without using the Sourcing Cockpit.
    At the end of the negociation (RFX --> Bids --> Auctions --> Bids), the awarded bid can be transformed into a backend PO or a backend Contrat.
    Rgds
    Christophe

  • How to get SC number for backend PO in classic scenario

    Hello,
    In classic scenario, how can I retrieve the SC number from PO backend number.
    Best Regards,
    Lina

    Hi,
    Please look at BBP_PD transaction. You will get better understanding how GUID are linked.
    Table   CRMD_ORDERADM_I
    GUID                         DDC1CD43BF9E69F1881A00505631332B
    OBJECT_TYPE          BUS2121001
    HEADER                    DDC1CD43BF9E2FF1881A00505631332B
    Table   CRMD_ORDERADM_H
    GUID                         DDC1CD43BF9E2FF1881A00505631332B
    OBJECT_ID               0010000077
    OBJECT_TYPE          BUS2121
    You can also use Function Modules. Please go to SE80 transaction and check Function Group BBP_PD_SC.
    Regards,
    Masa

  • Blanket PO for Services in SRM

    Hi,
    I want to set up Blanket PO for Services in Extended Classic scenario. Can anyone pass on the knowledge and configuration for the same.
    Your help would be highly appreciated. Email Id is [email protected]

    Hi,
    You can use the SRM standard functionality go to PO item and select Item cat as "Limit".
    This will create a service type and you can define limit amount.
    Let me know if this answers your requirement.
    Regards
    Sreedhar Vetcha

Maybe you are looking for