Down payment on AUC
Dear SAP Gurus,
While posting down payment for AUC using F-48, I am gettig the following error
You cannot post with transaction type 188
Message no. AA450
I am not entering this transction type in F-48.
Can you please help.
Thanks
Hi ,
You can check the SAP note 451163 - Error AA450 with down payment to an affiliated company.
The solution is as below:
Cause and prerequisites
This is caused by incorrect standard customizing for transaction type 188.
Solution
Remove the 'Transaction type cannot be used manually' indicator for transaction type 188.
Hope it helps
SJ
Similar Messages
-
Hi
I have issue on down payment in AUC.
Can any body plz help me out regarding the same with configuration?
Reply will be appreciated with points
Thanks & regards
AmarHi Babu,
Also I posted down payment entry with F-48.
System generated below entry.
Cash Cr Rs. 100000
Vendor Dr Rs. 100000
AUC Asst Dr. 100000
Down payment clrg Cr 100000
Can u tell me further step? I mean what is procedure for down payment clearing with auc assets.
I waiting ur reply.
Thanks & regards
Amar -
Hi,
I am having a query in Asset Down Payment for AUC
I have configured for both Acquisition: down payments and Down-payments clearing account in 'AO90' in asset module.
But I am still not clear why Down-payments clearing account account needs to be configured.
The entry I am getting are
1. F-47 DP request - I enter the Asset number here. Noted item.
2. F-48 -DP- an entry is created as follows:
Vendor Dr 1000
Bank Cr 1000
Acquisition: down payments Dr 1000
Down-payments clearing account Cr 1000
3. Now the Down-payments clearing account shows a credit balance all the time.
How should this be rectified
rgds
VidhyaHi Vidya,
Option 1: When you follow based on your example, ie., asset debited during down payment entry, asset entry will be reversed when you adjust down payment against invoice.
Option 2: Down payment request and down payment made against AUC asset with reference to Purchase order:
With reference to PO: Please refer sap note number 310368 valuated goods receipt paragraph and they have clearly mentioned about making down payments against asset/AUC purchase order without getting debited to asset account.
You have to make F5 378 message number to be a warning message instead of error message and you have to suppress asset related settings in OB41 posting keys 29 and 39. Posting key 39 is useful when you have down payment request.
If you have done this, then it will show only warning message during down payment that "purchase order is related to asset" and it will not be debited to asset account. Also after following the above steps, it is not necessary for you to give Acquisition: down payments G/L and Down payment clearing G/L in AO90 transaction code.
Hope this helps. Assign points if useful.
Regards,
Dwarak. -
hello Gurus.
we want to down payment against asset Purchase order using F-48.
during Simulate the Document we get the following error.
Account 26318501 is not a reconciliation account
Message no. AU138
Diagnosis
Processing terminated because account 26318501 (determined from account symbol KTANZA in chart of accounts YAIN) is not specified as a reconciliation account for assets.
Procedure
Define the account as a reconciliation account or assign a different account in the account determination for Asset Accounting.
the account 26318501 is Reconciliation accounts. still system generate the error.
how I resolved this issue.
I am waiting your reply.
regards,
riten patelHello Atif Farooq .
I have get two error.
if I made changes to recon account type to Asset then
during Down payment using F-48, system gives me error during the entry that
"Account 26318501 is not a reconciliation account for account type K
Message no. F5017
Diagnosis
The account 26318501 is to be used as a reconciliation account for the desired special G/L transaction. However, the account was not defined as a reconciliation account for account type K in the company code-specific part of the master record.
Procedure
If the account number is correct, change the master record of the account. If the account number is incorrect, determine via Customizing which account is to be used. The specification is made in table T074."
and if I made changes to recon account type to vendor then ,
system gives me error during Simulation that
Account 26318501 is not a reconciliation account
Message no. AU138
Diagnosis
Processing terminated because account 26318501 (determined from account symbol KTANZA in chart of accounts YAIN) is not specified as a reconciliation account for assets.
Procedure
Define the account as a reconciliation account or assign a different account in the account determination for Asset Accounting.
Please help me to solve this problem.
I am waiting your reply.
regards,
riten patel -
Hi,
I have one purchase order which has an asset under construction. i want to make down payment for a vendor for this particular purchase order. But when i go for F-47 and enter spl. gl : A and give reference of Purchase order it gives me an error that down payment not possible for this class of assets.
I also tried for for spl GL B and M. but not working. Pls help.
sonali.Dear Sonali,
Please check if you have maintained GL account assignment for Down Payments clearing account in AO90.
Assign points, if useful. -
Capitalization of Down-payments against AUC
Dear Experts,
Please help me in knowing that when do we use the following GLs assignments in T-Code AO90 :
1. Acquisition: down payments
2. Down-payments clearing account
How do these operate, I believe :
1. when a down-payment is posted with a Purch Document (PO) reference & is open the entry and at the time of settling Internal Order the postings would be Acquisition: down payments Debit and Down-payments clearing account credit.
2. Now again when the down-payment is cleared against a Invoice, then in perhaps in the next settlement run of Internal Order the postings would be Down-payments clearing account debit and Acquisition: down payments credit.
Please correct if i m going wrong & help me understand this concept.ok
-
Dear Experts,
Recently we have activated the down payment process in our system for normal purchase orders without configuring for AUC. In the month end we settle the internal orders to AUC (KO88), while doing this process, I got the error You cannot use this transaction type to post to this asset Message no. AA834,
I fixed this error by doing the required configuration in OAYB. In the next error system was throwing the errors related to account determination which can be fixed by maintaining the acquisition down payments and down payment clearing account in AO90.
I don’t understand the strange behavior of the system. There is no down payment in any of the purchase orders related to the AUC even then system is insisting for the down payment configuration.
I have maintained account determination in our test system and processed KO88 I can able to settle the internal order but some additional transaction with odd value has got posted by debiting the down payment acquisition WIP and crediting the Down payment clearing account.
I did not understood from where this value is flowing.
Please throw some light on this issue. I want to settle the internal orders to AUC without any error related to down payment as we are not using down payment for AUC.
With Regards
UdayHi,
If you are using Internal Order in Purchase Order and while doing down payment against Purchase Order, system is also picking Internal Order while processing down payment which cause of errors and posting Down Payment amount on asset while settling Internal Order.
Please follow the steps for not posting down payment to Internal Order.
Check your GL account which is using for Posting Down Payment against Sp. GL Ind. (Alternate GL Account)
Check the field status of that account.
Maker CO/PP Order as suppress field in Additional Account assignments.
Now Internal Order field will be suppress at the time of down payment against Purchase Order and then no down payment will be settle to Asset while settling Internal Order.
Regards
AJ -
AUC Down payment : Open invoice at year end
Hi All
For LATAM countries I need to complete the Down payment to AUC
At present the configuration is working fine for the following
Create Order type Z60 (KO01).Create distribution rule for the order.
Create AUC (AS01) and assign order number (AS01) .Create receiving asset.
Create purchase order for the asset and assign asset number created above to the PO (ME21N)
Create Down payment request (F-47) with the PO assignment
Create Down payment F-48 with reference to the Down payment request sent earlier
Create Goods Receipt (MIGO)
Create Invoice Receipt (MIRO)
Clear down payment against invoice.(F-54)
ACC entry generated
1
Say 100 was paid as DP against the PO
50 Bank Cr 100
29M Vendor dpecial GL Dr 100
70 AUC DP A/C Asset Dr 100
50 AUC Clearing A/c Cr 100
2
Asset acquisiton invoice posting (ME21N)
70 AUC Asset Dr 2000
31 Vendor Cr 2000
3.
Clearing Vendor down payment (F-54) against invoice
39A Vendor Special GL Cr 100
26 Vendor Dr 100
75 AUC down payment Cr 100
40 AUC clearing GL Dr 100
Now I need to test the scenario wherein the invoice is not recd at period end SAP proposes the creation of a reserves for expected invoice and reversal when the invoice is recd .I have already enabled the transaction types necessary for dp at period end but require assistance on what should be the next steps to test this
Anyone having done a year end close with outstanding invoice....can you please send me the necessary steps for transfer ...is it manual..posting details would be great
RegardsHi
has anyone encountered a similar situation ? -
Clear AuC down payment in AIAB transaction
Hi
I try to clear down payments on AuC in transaction AIAB (AIBU) to G/L.
Settlement rules 100 % to G/L account.
Balance of this operation is zero.
Example Items:
- transaction type 180 100 EUR
- transaction type 181 -100 EUR.
When I try to clear down payments from 2005, 2006 it's OK system just clear items and not generate documents for settle.
TTy 180 50 EUR (2005)
TTy 181 -50 EUR (2006)
But when I try to clear items first from 2006, second from 2007 system generate document for settle.
TTy 180 30 EUR (2006)
TTy 181 -30 EUR (2007)
I try also to settle this zero balance to active asset but system still generate document.
Is there any settings which not allow for clear in current year ?
I check also values in all currency all are the same.
Thanks for any answear.
ZHi Babu,
Also I posted down payment entry with F-48.
System generated below entry.
Cash Cr Rs. 100000
Vendor Dr Rs. 100000
AUC Asst Dr. 100000
Down payment clrg Cr 100000
Can u tell me further step? I mean what is procedure for down payment clearing with auc assets.
I waiting ur reply.
Thanks & regards
Amar -
How appropriate down payment AuC using F110 transaction?
Hello, I have a problem to appropriate down payment for "AuC" using F110 tcode:
We work with CJ20N> Project Builder> WBS Element> Network> activity> Purchase Requisition.
With the transaction ME21N> creation of the Purchase Order with reference to the Purchase Requisition.
With the purchase order placed, we are committed to the project equal to the value of the purchase order.
With the F-47 created a request for "down payment" and the F-48 or F110 consolidated the "down payment " and does not change the value committed in the "WBS element ". That's right..
The Value of the down payment is appropriate when the WBS element is filled in the field "WBS Element" (F-47 Tcode) and ran the F-48 tcode with reference to the doc's F-47.
In F110 tcode (created as a reference to the doc's new F-47) do not have field to fill the WBS element, which carries an appropriation of the down payment to "Network Object" which is assigned to the Purchase Order.
When the CJ88 is executed (if the F-48 is used), the costs are appropriate to the AUC correctly.
If the CJ88 is performed (when the F110 is used) can not appropriate the value of "down payment" to the AUC.
We need the same functionality as the F-48 T Code in Tcode F110 once the scenario where our clients do not want to use the F-48.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks for your attention.
Vitti
SAP Consultant IM_PS
Edited by: deraldo ricieri vitti on Mar 29, 2011 8:04 PM
Edited by: deraldo ricieri vitti on Mar 29, 2011 8:09 PMThis is very much possible.
But need some config. changes
Please go to FBZP
Select all company codes tab
Select your Company code and double click it.
Here under Vendor tab you have to enter all the special GL indicators whatever possible for your transactions.
Now come to F110 screen, under free selection tab through document you can select special GL indicators.
Here you have to give sp. GL indicator which you have used in your F-47 screen for your AUC accounts.
A/C entry would be
Vendor a/c Dr(GL-Down payment made to assets through Sp. GL Indicator)
Bank a/c Cr
Rgds
Murali. N -
Appropriation down payment AuC using F110 tcode
Hello, I have a problem to appropriate down payment for AuC using F110 tcode:
We work with CJ20N> Project Builder> WBS Element> Network> activity> Purchase Requisition.
With the transaction ME21N> creation of the Purchase Order with reference to the Purchase Requisition.
With the purchase order placed, we are committed to the project equal to the value of the purchase order.
With the F-47 created a request for "down payment" and the F-48 or F110 consolidated the "down payment " and does not change the value committed in the "WBS element ". That's right..
The Value of the down payment is appropriate when the WBS element is filled in the field "WBS Element" (F-47 Tcode) and execute the F-48 tcode with reference to the doc's F-47.
In F110 tcode (created as a reference to the doc's new F-47) do not have field to fill the WBS element, which carries an appropriation of the down payment to "Network Object" which is assigned to the Purchase Order.
When the CJ88 is executed (if the F-48 is used), the costs of down payment is appropriate to the AUC correctly.
If the CJ88 is performed (when the F110 is used) can not appropriate the value of down payment to the AUC.
We need the same functionality as the F-48 T Code in F110 once the scenario where our clients do not want to use the F-48 but the F110 Tcode.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks for your attention.
Vitti
SAP Consultant IM_PSThis is very much possible.
But need some config. changes
Please go to FBZP
Select all company codes tab
Select your Company code and double click it.
Here under Vendor tab you have to enter all the special GL indicators whatever possible for your transactions.
Now come to F110 screen, under free selection tab through document you can select special GL indicators.
Here you have to give sp. GL indicator which you have used in your F-47 screen for your AUC accounts.
A/C entry would be
Vendor a/c Dr(GL-Down payment made to assets through Sp. GL Indicator)
Bank a/c Cr
Rgds
Murali. N -
Down payment against the Internal Order - for Capital Expenditure
Dear friends
I am getting an error while making down payment against the purchase order.
The order of my entries or steps are as follows:
Created one internal order for Capital WIP with budget and availability control activation.
Created one purchase order against a vendor with reference to the above Internal Order.
When I am making the down payment to the vendor through tcode:F-48, the system throwing an error
"Define Cost Elements for Down Payments".
Can any one please explain why this error is coming. When I checked in Internal orders, there is a TCode: OKEP for Define Default Cost Elements for Down Payments.
System is asking for cost element, but where as what ever the down payment we are making is nothing but advance which is current asset. Why system is asking for cost element?
Can any one give me the guidance how to handle the issue.
Thanks in Advance
Kiran Kumar AThe reason is when you want the down payment for AUC to be capitalised, then you would need to create cost element for Downpayments.
Normally as per design of SAP, down payment being a Balance Sheet Account (Current Asset as you rightly mentioned) doesnot need / accept an Cost object, as a special case since down payments for AUC needs to be capitalised and hence need to be carried to Controlling (Internal Order) by creating Cost Element for Downpayments.
Go ahead and create the cost element. That would resolve your issue. -
Hi Gurus,
I have scenario where i need your expert advise.
1. Posted down payment on AUC asset- 01 depreciation area-1000 USD
30 Group depreciation area- 1500 CAD
later we realized that this project is scrapped and user posted down payment clearing by using 181 transaction type. Due to the exchange rate fluctuation the amount in group currency area has increased and left the balance on AUC. Now we want to scarp the AUC. Tried all the possible ways, but getting error saying that clear the down payment on auc first
Has anyone encounter similar kind of scenario. If yes please let me know how to clear the balance left over in group currency depreciation areaYou would have simply reversed the original down payment entry
Now you reverse the entry, which is with TType 181 thru AB08
Then reverse the original down paymetn entry.
Eveything should match now. -
Hi,
At the time of doing down payment on AUC asset with reference to Purchase order i am getting error saying " you cannot use this transaction type by to post this asset".
I am using spl Gl indicator "M" for the purpose of noting the down payment on CWIP assets.
Where i am going wrong.
Regards
KM NaiduHi,
you get this error because the asset to which you try to post it is not an asset under construction.
Regards,
Miroslav -
Down payment to recipient area 01 amount not cleared
Hi All,
I am facing one error at the time of settlement runing--
As per my business process we run the settlement process for settlement the AUC Asset to Fixed Asset.
Now at the time of runing Parital settlement process we face the error massage No. AW605.
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Regards,Hi,
Please see the notes 35309 point 4 and 336803. Here below a extract of what mentioned in the note:
For business reasons you can only make down payments to assets under construction and therefore you cannot post down payments from AuC to active assets. The error message appears if the balance in the current final settlement of settled down payments is not zero
Please clear the downpayments if you want to settle the values to a final asset.
Please check the final settlement of settled down payments is not zero in the previous years.
regards Bernhard
Maybe you are looking for
-
Crystal report viewer 2.0.23 access denied
Post Author: gionnyDeep CA Forum: General hi all I'm using CR viewer 2.0.23 in a java standalone apllication.Actually whe i try to open a CR XI report with CR viewer 2.0.23 i get Access denied. It look like CR viewer does not fetch login information
-
IDOC-XI-File Scenario -Response?
I know how to configure R/3 to send IDOC to XI, and then XI-File configuration. I read how-to doc on acknowledgment, it assumes the receiving party is also on R/3 where they configured AUDIT to send response from receiving party. But this case is rec
-
Any more info on Retina display optimized Photoshop?
Just checking back every couple of weeks (or months) to see if there is any more information regarding any availability of Photoshop CS6 optimized for Retina display capabilities? I know that it was probably a rush job getting it ready for the Apple
-
WHEN I TRY TO CROP A PHOTO MY IOS 5.1.1 8GB 963MB LEFT IPOD TOUCH 4 CRASHES!
It crashes :(
-
SCCM 2012 internet based client mgmt installation in Lab
Hi All Is it possible to install sccm 2012 WITH INTERNET BASED CLIENT MGMT IN lAB???