Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

Hi,
Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
Could you suggest on this issue.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Regards,
Rakesh

The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

Similar Messages

  • Grand total values are not matching with Detail report

    Report has grand totals and when I drill to the detail report, grand total values are NOT matching with parent report totals, I did some analysis but I'm clueless on this issue.
    Please provide your thoughts and insight on this issue..
    Thanks

    is your summary and detail reports hitting different facts, like summary hitting aggregate and detail report hitting it's corresponding detail level fact..?
    if then,
    From Front-end:
    Fix the filter values in detail report that are passing from master report then try delete each columns then check the grand total. If you found your values is matching by deleting particular column then you need to investigate what is the issue around with that dimension table..
    From Database side:
    1. check first aggregate table has proper aggregate data of it's detail..
    2. Take the detail report obiee generated query and try to comment each dimension table and it's corresponding joins to the facts, (before, this delete all the dimensional columns and other measures from select statement and put only that measure where you are getting wrong value, so that you need not to comment all the select and group by columns which saves your time.. ). Need to check by commenting each dimensional wid and it's table from clause, if you found that values is matching then there is some problem with wid columns data population in your ETL.
    Is that BI-Apps project?
    btw, whtz ur name?

  • Sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report

    Dear Gurus,
    Looking Ur assistance for an issue.
    Issue: For some of the sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report. Actual No of Pipes matches with LIKP table values in R3. Query needs to be modified to restrict records as per logic in WGSRLDES report/program.
    Can U help me in this Regard.
    Ur Responses are most appreciated.

    Hey Pathak,
                        The problem is, BI report is matching with the datails with R/3 LIKP table. But the business user is using Report WGSRLDES report/program, where the data is missmatching.
    Hope U got my Point.

  • Accounts Payable Reconciliation Account does not match with sap report

    Hello Folks,
    I have problem with AP reconciliation account, that the balances in FS10N for a particular Company Code for particular reconciliation account balance do not match with the report run to show the vendor  balances in local currency (report tcode F.98). Balance does not match for last posting period of the FY.
    I have tried looking all the vendors in that particular GL recon account and ran the report, but still it i wast able to find out anything. May be Special GL transaction posting be there, but how to check that is there any spl gl transaction it there in the recon account.
    I this to be solved by tonight, all the inputs will be very much appreciated and point will be assigned for sure.
    Thanks you all.

    Hi,
    In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
    The reconsilation account form the Vendor
    The G/L account where to posting is created on.
    It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
    The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
    It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
    Paul

  • Trail balance is not matching with fagll03 report

    friends,
    our trial balance is showing one value and fagllo3 individual gl is showing another value, particularly in entry view it is showing other value, it is showing some small difference. is there any program to match trail and fagll03.
    regards,

    Hi Team,
    Greetings for the Day,
    I have the same issue, please suggest me on this.
    Trial Balance report for period 01-09, is not matching with the report from FAGLL03.
    I would be highly obliged if you could suggest me on this, thanks.
    Thanking in Advance,
    Raghav.
    [email protected]

  • Value not match in KEAT report  with FI

    Hi All,
    I am going through KEAT report, here is saw that the value of one GL Account in FI  value Column does not match with the value  of the same GL in FBL3N.
    Is there is any particular reason as other GL account value matches with the value in FBL3N.
    Regards,
    Shayam

    KEAT shows values posted from the SD module only. If the value is not the same as the account total, then possibly someone has posted to that account directly from FI (TC FB50 or similar). You should be able to find such manually posted documents in FBL3N by looking at fields like "reference" "document type" and such.

  • Utilization values not matching with g/l accounts

    Hi Mentors
    while I am doing the utilization (J2IUN) FOR the month april my utilization balances not matching with g/l accounts. till the march my balances is tallying.
    why i am not tallying in april. please suggest me.
    thanks in advance
    Laxman

    During utilization, the GL balances are read and shown. Hence there should not be any discrepancy. However, please check the GL transactions for the month of April to find out if any non excise posting (a financial JV, for example) has been entered.
    Regards,
    Aroop

  • Balances not match with FMEM report and FS10N GL wise

    We have developed in report in funds management, it has to be executed based on commitment item and fund center not GL account wise. The report will have two rows actual budget and pan budget. The actual budget should match with GL account balance; it is matching for all GL account except 3 GL accounts. These 3 GL accounts balance is showing more than report balance for three periods (April, May and June).
    Can I know in which I should check. Because I have tried with possibilities I couldn’t get
    thanks and regards

    Hi,
    In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
    The reconsilation account form the Vendor
    The G/L account where to posting is created on.
    It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
    The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
    It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
    Paul

  • Report Painter Issue-GR55

    Hi,
    I have an issue in report painter-GR55. Our report in report painter will show planed / actual cost, planed /actual quantity. Our material cost planing is done from cost activity of the project builder. Whereas in the report output , some material quantity is showing as planed quantity for which planed cost of the project is showing wrong. We are picking data from RWCOOM Table. Please advise on this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ranjan

    Not possible....SAP standard behaviour....

  • AR01 balance is not matching with FAGLL03 balance between the segments

    Dear Consultants
    I am facing one problem in Assets Reconciliation. I.e, the balance which is showing in AR01 report is not matching with FAGLL03 report for P & M Assets.
    In my client I have two segment . 1000 and 2000.            
    As per that reports of both AR01 and FAGLL03  effect is  as follows.
    1.     GL value is showing more by Rs.54,13,516.34  with  AR01 in 1000 segment in P &M at
                    31.03.2009
    2.     GL value is showing Less by Rs.54,13,516.34  with AR01 in 2000 segment  in P & M at
                    31.03.2009
    After uploading the legacy balances as on 30.06.2008,
    1.SAP Segmental Trail Balance has been tallied with Segmental Trial balance as 30.06.2008
    2.Except this P & M balances, remaining all assets were tallied between FAGLL03 and
      AR02 segment wise.
    3.acquisitions during the year also tallied and Over all at company code level balance from 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009 also tallied for all Assets including this P &M.
    Cross check points:
    1.I have checked the cost center , profit center and segments assignment u2013ok
    2.I have tallied Profit center wise AR01 and FAGLL03. except, this P &M
    3. No Manual Entries has been posted
    So pls suggest me what could be possible reasons for this
    any how. my client maintained the legacy system till 31.03.2009 along with SAP. now as per Oracle we are matching this values. so ,what I am thinking is ,to match the balances in P &M between the segments, Shall I post the JV between these gment? because , as on  31.03.2009 legachy value is matching with AR01 values. 
    --Only problem between Legacy value and GL Value.
    --Depreciation not yet posted.
    --client is ready to pass required adjustement entries after posting the depreciation as on 31.03.2009 to 
      match with legacy balance
    --So ,I dont think it is not problem  if post the manual entry in Asset GL to match the balance between legacy and Fagll03 report
    --Over all Comapny code level plant and Machinery values is tallied with Legachy value
    early reply will be very highly appreicated
    Regards
    Edited by: Ramatulasi Marivada on May 27, 2009 10:33 AM

    Hello,
    Run ABST2 to know the difference between GL and Asset Accounting.
    Hope you must have reset the reconciliation accounts of assets OAMK and posted all the relevant GL asset balances. Note that initial asset balances loaded in AA will not automatically be transferred to GL. You need to pass the JVs.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Fund center reports Assigned values are not matching with ledger balances.

    Thanks for your Support. We have activated funds management in May-2009. And deactivated one or two times. Now the status is active.
    Now we are taking reports the assigned values are not matching with gl ledger balances.
    1. We need to update records for April- May.
    2. Records in between deactivated and activate time.
    Please suggest updating fund centers and commitments.
    Regards

    hi ELI
    i have checked the follwoing secnarios
    1. funds management deactivated.
    2. one document posted  with amount10000
    3. funds management activated.
    4. we have executed FMN0
    here no document is selected after execution.
    Please suggest what are the activities we need to do if i am wrong...
    Regards

  • FI vs MM report - Stock Values not matching

    Dear Experts,
    MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year.
    FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values.
    The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
    Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
    How & where to analysis?
    Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
    Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
    I really appreciate if any one help me
    Thanks & Regards,
    n a v a h s e k

    Hello,
    I thought, You can post manually to your stock account.
    First you can look the account change history for your stock account. Automatic posting check may be change by someone at past, and after manually posting, check it again.
    Z programs which is posting FI document with BAPI, system can not look automatic posting checkbox in FS00. May be Z programs posting to your stock without MM module.
    How can you catch this document?
    Answer is, please add BKPF-AWTYP field to your FBL3N report.
    Call SPRO -> Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Customer Accounts -> Line Items -> Display Line Items -> Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display
    Please add new entry with using BKPF-AWTYP then save this customizing and please run RFPOSXEXTEND report with using SE38 transaction. While running this program, a pop-up appear on your screen, please click "YES" after that program will finish correctly. Then you can see "Reference Transact." field in FBL3N report.
    Then list your stock account with using this report and get subtotal for "Reference Transact.". If this field value is MKPF, these postings is coming from MM module. If there is a BKPF or BKPFF value, those are posting manually from FI module.
    I hope it helps to you,
    Regards,
    Burak

  • The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assi

    Hi ,
    We have enabled context sensitive DFF in Bank Branch Page for HZ_PARTIES DFF , We have created Flex Map so that only bank branch context fields are only displayed in the bank branch page and  as we know party information DFF is shared by supplier and Customer Page so we dint want to see any Bank Branch fields or context information in those pages.
    We have achieved the requirement but when open existing branches bank branch update is throwing below error message :
    "The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assistance."
    this error is thrown only when we open existing branches, if we save existing branch and open then it is not throwing any error message.
    Please let us know reason behind this error message.
    Thanks,
    Mruduala

    You are kidding?  It took me about 3 minutes to scroll down on my tab to get to the triplex button!
    Habe you read the error message? 
    Quote:
    java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-04098: trigger 'PMS.PROJECT_SEQ' is invalid and failed re-validation
    Check the trigger and it should work again.
    Timo

  • Monthly Aggregate Values are Not matching between Two Reports

    Hi,
    I have two custom reports (Pivot Table View)
    _1) National Report_ This report renders data for the 10/11 Season (From 04/01/2010 To 03/31/2011). It includes Monthly Aggregate as well as 10/11 Season Grand Total. This report shows the correct information. We don't have to do any changes.
    _2) YOYOY Report_
    This report renders data for the 10/11, 09/10, 08/09 Season (From 04/01/2008 To 03/31/2011). It includes Monthly Aggregate for each of the three seasons as well as Grand Total for each Season.
    Issue:
    Monthly Aggregate Total for the YOYOY Report is not matching with the National Report Monthly Aggregate Total.
    Technical Background:
    - For 10/11 Season, the expressions used to arrive at the Monthly Aggregate Total is the same.
    - Filter Criteria for (1) Report is specific to 10/11 Season (Rest of the criteria is similar)
    - Filter Criteria for (2) Report is for 08/09, 09/10, 10/11 Season (Rest of the criteria is similar)
    - In Report (1), Date Expressions are based on the following Attributes
    Column Name: Month
    Expression: MONTHNAME(Activity."Created Date")
    Column Name: Sort on Created Month
    Expression: CASE MONTH(Activity."Created Date") WHEN 4 THEN 1 WHEN 5 THEN 2 WHEN 6 THEN 3 WHEN 7 THEN 4 WHEN 8 THEN 5 WHEN 9 THEN 6 WHEN 10 THEN 7 WHEN 11 THEN 8 WHEN 12 THEN 9 WHEN 1 THEN 10 WHEN 2 THEN 11 WHEN 3 THEN 12 END
    Column Name: 10/11 Season
    Expression: /* Metric column name: # of high risk infants identified since last visit */ CASE WHEN "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 END
    Aggregation Rule: Sum
    - In Report (2), Date Expressions are based on the following Attributes
    Column Name: Month Column
    Expression: Date."Calendar Month"
    Column Name: Sort on Created Month
    Expression: CASE Date."Calendar Month" WHEN 4 THEN 1 WHEN 5 THEN 2 WHEN 6 THEN 3 WHEN 7 THEN 4 WHEN 8 THEN 5 WHEN 9 THEN 6 WHEN 10 THEN 7 WHEN 11 THEN 8 WHEN 12 THEN 9 WHEN 1 THEN 10 WHEN 2 THEN 11 WHEN 3 THEN 12 END
    Column Name: 10/11 Season
    Expression: CASE WHEN Activity."Created Date" BETWEEN /* First Day of Current Season */ timestampadd(sql_tsi_day, -dayofmonth(current_date)+1, timestampadd(sql_tsi_month, -(month(current_date) - 4), Current_DATE)) AND Current_DATE THEN "- Activity Custom Metrics".S_INT_10 ELSE 0 END
    Aggregation Rule: Sum
    Key Information:
    - For 10/11 Season, Activity."Created Date" attribute is used for all the calculations based on date.
    - For 08/09 and 09/10 Season, Date.Date attribute is used for all the calculations based on date. This is because the data was migrated from Asset Record Type to Activity Record Type for these seasons.
    I have tried variety of options and nothing seems to get the Monthly Aggregate matching. Kindly suggest what changes do we require.
    Regards,
    Muddessar Nadeem Alanji
    +91-98456 13180

    Hi,
          Are you saying that you loaded the same excel document to both planning area and cube but the data in both is not matching??
    How did you load the excel data to planning area?
    Can you give more details on what data is not matching? Is the cube value smaller than the value you see in planning book?
    Secondly if you are looking at data, make sure your selections are right. In cube, you have to specify the characteristics and at the bottom of the screen you specify the number of records to be displayed. Increase that to some big number like 9999 so that you can see all the records.

  • Rebate agreement-Difference coming for credit note value and drill down value .

    Hello Friends,
    In 2013 we had created one rebate for which the validity period was 1st April 2013 to 31st March 2014 . At the end of each month, rebate amount was settled by raising credit note to the customer . Now at the end of March'14 during final settlement, a credit note was raised to the customer . The issue here is there is difference of 1.13 (Pounds) between credit note value and the drill down value for March'14 . Lets say our credit note value is-100 (Pounds)and Drill down value for the month March'14 is 101.13 Pounds. We are not able to find out why this difference is coming . Please let me know your inputs on this .
    Regards,
    Sandeep G. 

    Sandeep -
    During final settlement of a rebate agreement, it calculates rebate amout for the the entire time period less payments already made to a customer and then issues a credit memo request based on that.Please check all the the invoices created during entire period and check accrual calculation.It should match.
    You can check VBOX table to get billing documents for the entire period.
    Let us know if you still have an issue.
    Thanks & Regards
    Amit Gupta

Maybe you are looking for

  • Clean install Windows 8.1 Lenovo TPT 2

    I have a thinkpad tablet 2 that crashed when updating to 8.0 to 8.1. I don't have a recovery key. I'm attempting to load windows 8.1 enterprise 32bit onto the tablet I've got it loaded on via a bootable USB key. However after booting to windows 8.1 t

  • Airport Express not showing up in Utility after wireless disabled

    Hi everybody, Last night I made the mistake of disabling wireless on my Airport Express. It had worked perfectly before, but now that I want to re-enable wireless, the Express won't show up in Utility! Does anybody have any tips as to how to get it t

  • SPL screen for FI payment docuemnt

    Hi, SPL acreening for Financial accounting is working for limited transactions. Vendor payment document with check printing and F110 payment proposal is working fine. But with customer paymenr receipts, Manual payment document creation through F-28 i

  • Recovery issue macbook pro

    Hi all just looking to see if i have covered all the bases with an issue im having. My macbook pro wont boot I get the grey screen then apple logo then crash and the macbook powers down. I can hold down the option key select recovery I get the apple

  • Transportation chain - preliminary - main leg

    Hi, Let's imagine we are in a transportation scenarion where i have a certain number of deliveries to the same customer. Deliveries are assigned to a shipment main leg. Deliveries are packed in large box and some documents are printed (invoice, packi